Download - 04. buddhist ethics

Transcript
Page 1: 04. buddhist ethics

Buddhist Ethics

Dr. Natdhira Sridee

Page 2: 04. buddhist ethics

General Concept of Ethics

Page 3: 04. buddhist ethics

The meaning of EthicsO Ethics is the branch of study dealing with what

is the proper course of action for man. It answers the question, "What do I do?" It is the study of right and wrong in human endeavors.

Page 4: 04. buddhist ethics

WHY DO WE NEED ETHICS?

The answer is Because we conflict about the term

“Value”.

Page 5: 04. buddhist ethics

O The term “good” is a value of Action. Now, for understand distinctly, we should consider term “good” compare with the term “fact”

Page 6: 04. buddhist ethics

Case study

Group A

1. This picture is drown by Paul Gauguin.

Page 7: 04. buddhist ethics

Mr.Daeng is 8ft. High and He is so handsome.

Page 8: 04. buddhist ethics

This Constitution is provided on last year.

Page 9: 04. buddhist ethics

Group B

1. This picture is beautiful.

2. Mr. Daeng is good.

3. This law is justice.

Page 10: 04. buddhist ethics

VALUE OR FACT

Let we consider the term “Value and Fact”

1. This knife is good.

2. This doctor is good.

3. That girl is dam beautiful.

4. The dog is good.

Page 11: 04. buddhist ethics

CONCLUSION

Value : is desirable characteristics.Fact : is the character of verified information

about past or present circumstances or events which are presented as objective reality.

Page 12: 04. buddhist ethics

THE TYPE OF VALUES

1. Intrinsic Value is an ethical and philosophic property. It is the ethical or philosophic value that an object has "in itself" or "for its own sake", as an intrinsic property. An object with intrinsic value may be regarded as an end or end-in-itself.

2. Extrinsic Value : The ethical value exists outside, does not exist in itself.

Page 13: 04. buddhist ethics

The Scope of Ethics

1. The value of human’s conduct2. The goal of life3. The Moral judgement

Page 14: 04. buddhist ethics

“Good” or “bad”

Now, we will examine what is good or bad, because it concerns with human conduct, and they always confuse about the meaning and value of its. we will debate the problem of this term ‘good or bad’ investigate the three theories as follows;

Page 15: 04. buddhist ethics

1. Naturalism2. Non-Naturalism3. Emotivism

Page 16: 04. buddhist ethics

NATURALISM

Naturalism views that we can define the Ethical value and what we use to define have to be beyond the scope of Ethics, that is, it is in Nature.

For instance, ‘good thing is right thing’. In this sentence we use the term ‘right’ define the term ‘good’.

Page 17: 04. buddhist ethics

In concept of Naturalism, we cannot use the ‘right’ define the term ‘good’, because both have the same ethical value. Then the definition of ethical value, we have to use the term which is beyond the scope of Ethics. Ex. The good thing is what the public like.

Page 18: 04. buddhist ethics

In this sentence, we define the term ‘good’ by the term ‘the view of public’, because it is the phenomena which appears in the society. This is not the phenomena of Ethics, but it is phenomena of society. The society is a part of the World, and the world is a part of Nature.

Hence, ‘the view of public’ is the phenomena of the nature, we, therefore, in the case, define the ethical value by nature.

Page 19: 04. buddhist ethics

Utilitarianism, ‘the good thing is the greatest happiness or greatest felicity principle’. In this sentence, the happiness is the natural phenomena. It appear to human when they meet something they like.

Then Utilitarianism is Naturalism because define the term ‘good’ by the nature’. If there is some who is insane define that ‘good is green’ or ‘good is what make it rains’. He is also naturalism. But you agree with him, don’t you? It depend on you.

Page 20: 04. buddhist ethics

Naturalism views that the ethical value is relate with some facts, such as, in the concept of Hedonism or Utilitarianism, when we said that;

A. this is goodit means;

B. It can make the greatest happiness

Page 21: 04. buddhist ethics

NON-NATURALISM

Non-Naturalism determine that the ethical value which is the moral property does not concern with natural property. The terms ‘good’ or ‘bad’ are the character of action. Then we cannot define it. But we can know by intuition (Intuitionism).

Page 22: 04. buddhist ethics

O Human being know what is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ by special faculty. Eyes, ears, nose, tongue are the physical faculties, and form, sound, smell and test are the physical properties. But these are not the special faculty. The special faculty in concept of Ethics is intellect (conscience). Some thinkers call it ‘moral faculty

Page 23: 04. buddhist ethics

EMOTIVISM

For Emotivism, when we said that ‘something is good or bad’, it does not mean that ‘it has or does not has the ethical character. We just show the feeling or emotion toward that thing.

Page 24: 04. buddhist ethics

O Ex. We said that ‘yesterday Peter has stolen the money at Wat Tallom’. This sentence is the fact, we may argue that it is true or not true. And suppose that we said that ‘yesterday Peter has stolen the money at Wat Tallom, Peter do it wrong’.

Page 25: 04. buddhist ethics

O For Naturalism and Non-naturalism, we are arguing “does the term ‘wrong’ has the ethical value”. But for Emotivim, this sentence is nonsense. Because we cannot argue that ‘who is wrong or good?’. It is just a feeling. It does not specify any property of Ethical value.

Page 26: 04. buddhist ethics

GOOD OR BAD IN CONCEPT OF RELIGIONS

Now, we will examine the good or bad in concept of religions as follows;

1. Buddhism2. Christianity3. Islam

Page 27: 04. buddhist ethics

Buddhist Ethics

O Buddhism, like any other Indian religion, does not divorce knowledge from conduct, theory from practice. Philosophy is meaningful only as it provides an understanding of reality on which to regulate one’s life. Therefore, according to Buddhist ethics, any knowledge cannot be separated from practice. Cause and effect are related. However, the term “ethics” during the time of the Buddha was not used.

Page 28: 04. buddhist ethics

OThe used terms in the Buddha’s time

were Brahmacariya, Dhamma-Vinaya and

Navagasatthussana. Now let us consider the

meanings and significance of them

respectively.

Page 29: 04. buddhist ethics

1. Brahmacariya.

OThe term “Brahmacariya” was used by

the Buddha when he sent out his sixty-one

disciples for the first missionary. He

pronounces:

Page 30: 04. buddhist ethics

O Caratha Bhikkhave Caravan Bahujanahitāya

Bahujanasukhāya Loknukampya Atthya Hitya

Sukhya Devamanussna …Brahmacariya Paksetha.

O Monks, you have to preach the Brahmacariya

(Doctrine, Code of ethics) for health and welfare of

mankind and gods… (Vin. 4/32/32).

Page 31: 04. buddhist ethics

Further, there is another evidence showing the code of ethics:

Ayameva Kho Bhikkhu Ariyo Ahagiko Maggo

Brahmacariya…

Monk, the Noble Eightfold Path is Brahmacariya: Code

of Ethics

(S. 19/30/7).

Page 32: 04. buddhist ethics

O Therefore, Brahmacariya literally means the sublime life. Here, it is called “Buddhist Ethics.” It means the noble conduct or the noble behavior because it leads those who practise and it society to the highest virtue

Page 33: 04. buddhist ethics

2. Dhamma-Vinaya.

O This is used before the passing away of the Buddha:

O Yo nanda May Dhammo ca Vinayo ca Desito Paatto

So Vo Mamaccayena Sattha.

O Dhamma-Vinaya: Teaching and Discipline taught and

established by me will be your teacher (S. 10/141/138).

Page 34: 04. buddhist ethics

Top Related