download post show report - power-gen · pdf fileconference and exhibition was held from 6-8...
TRANSCRIPT
Organized by: Presented by: Supported by:
POST SHOW REPORT
6-8 May 2013Bombay Exhibition Centre
Mumbai, India
With the support of the Ministry of PowerGovernment of India
• The 12th annual POWER-GEN India & Central Asia (PGICA) and joint Renewable Energy World India (REWI) & HydroVision India (HVI) 2013Conference and Exhibition was held from 6-8 May 2013 at Bombay Exhibition Centre, Mumbai, India
• Overall, the combined PGICA/REWI/HVI 2013 conference and exhibition was attended by 7,008 attendees from 57 countries. comprising 6,040 visitors, 565 delegates, 262 exhibitors, 26 chairs, 6 keynote speakers, 97 speakers and 12 press.
• The combined PGICA/REWI/HVI 2013 conference attracted 97 leading Indian and international speakers
• The combined PGICA/REWI/HVI 2013 exhibition showcased the very latest products and technologies from large multinational organizations based in India and around the globe by 262 local and international companies
• Show highlights included an Inauguration Ceremony attended by ministry, government and private enterprise representation and Joint High LevelPanel Discussion: Indian Power – Time to Deliver le by experts speakers covering critical issues affecting the power, renewable and hydropower sectors
Event Overview
• The PGICA 2013 conference saw 26 chairs and 97 speakers from 17 countries present 14 strategic and technical sessions covering the latest technical issues, business challenges and future trends and the exhibition featured the very latest products and technologies across the entire power sector
• The PGICA conference programme featured 15 technical topicsspanning over 15 sessions
• The PGICA exhibition featured 262 exhibitors from more than 20 countries reaching a exhibition floor capacity of 100%
• A total of 60% of exhibitors rebooked or reserved on site
Key Facts
PGICA 2013 was officially opened with an Inauguration Ceremony heldon Monday 6 May 2013.
Keynote speakers included:• Mr. Glenn Ensor, Director of Events, PennWell, UK • Dr. Uddesh Kohli, Advisor, POWER-GEN India & Central Asia
2013• Mr. Masafumi Wani, Representative Director & Executive Vice
President, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Japan• Mr. L.K. Jha, Director/Technical, NTPC Ltd, India• Dr. Kirit Parikh, Former Member (Energy), Planning
Commission, India• Mr. Rajan Sharma, Managing Director, Inter Ads Exhibitions
Pvt. Ltd, India
The ceremony was attended by 300 VIPs, delegates, visitors and press
Inauguration Ceremony
AlstomCountry Communication Director Mr. Vandana Dhir
AlstomHead Corporate Communication Mr. P C Sharma
Tata Power Vice President Mr. Arun SrivastavaSiemens Ltd. Mr. Vikul RastogiSiemens Ltd. Mr. Satbir MalikSiemens Ltd.Mr. Arpit GargResource Development Group CEO Mr. P.K. PatnaikReliance Power Director Finance Mr. Krishna MankadPower Trading Corporation Executive DirectorDr. Rajiv MishraLanco Power Ltd Director & CEO Mr. K. Raja Gopal
Joint Electricity Regulatory Commission Athena Demwe Power Pvt. Ltd.Chairman Dr. V K Garg
Everest Power Pvt. Ltd. CMD Dr. C R Prasad BSES Rajdhani Power HQ Addl Vice President Mr. Anil VarshneyBlack & Veatch Associate Vice President Mr. Anand PattaniAlstomManager - Marketing Mr. Neeraj Sharma
Adani Power Ltd. Vice PresidentMr. Sundara Kavidass
Adani Power Ltd. India Director Mr. R K Madan
Advisory Board Members
1. India 84.4%2. China 3.0%3. South Korea 2.1%4. USA 1.6%5. Germany 1.5%6. Italy 1.0%7. Russian Federation 0.8%8. UK 0.7%
Total 57 countries represented
9. Czech Republic 0.5%10. Ukraine 0.3%11.Croatia 0.3%12.Spain 0.2%13.Netherlands 0.2%14. Japan 0.2%15. Other 3.2%
Geographic Representation
14%
12%
12%
10%9%
8%
8%
8%
6%
5%
5%2%1%0% Machinery electrical / electronic
Engineering Firm
Other Services
Industrial / Cogeneration
Consulting firms
Original Equipment & electronic
Construction Company
Other Industries
Independent power co
State owned power utility
Government
Investor owned electric utility
IT & software provider
Institutional power plant
Type of Company
Visitor Demographics
22%
21%
17%
16%
12%
9%3%
Owner/CEO
Executive Management
Engineering Design &SystemsEmployee
Other
Engineering Management
Operation / Maintenance
48%
26%
14%
12%
RecommendedFinal DecisionOtherSpecify
47%
24%
18%
11%
First TimeOccasionallyFrequentlyEvery Year
Discipline
Purchasing Role
Exhibition Frequency
64%
29%
7%
OneTwoThree
Days Spent at Event
Visitor Demographics
24%
21%
19%
12%
7%
7%
6%4%
E‐mail
Invitation fromExhibitorWord of Mouth
PennWell Website
Brochure
News Paper Ad
Social NetworkingSitePreviouslytt d d
31%
30%
9%
7%
23%
LinkedInFacebookNoneTwitterYouTube
27%
24%18%
17%
14%Within 3 weeks ofthe event15 or more weeksin advance3 ‐ 6 weeks inadvance6 ‐ 10 weeks inadvance10 ‐ 15 weeks inadvance
First Hear of Event
Social Media Usage
Registration Type
Best Time to Notify
74%
26%
YesNo
Visitor Demographics
73%
26%
1%
HighNeutralLow 51%48%
1%
NeutralHighLow
48%48%
4%
HighNeutralLow
Main Reason for Attending
Networking
Keep Up to Date
New Products & Technologies
38%
28%
11%
NeutralHighLow
Business with New Suppliers
Visitor Demographics
Visitor Demographics
67%
22%
11% 0%
GoodSatisfactoryExcellentPoor
40%
37%
13%
10%
GoodSatisfactoryPoorExcellent
50%
28%
22%
0%
GoodSatisfactoryExcellentPoor
Quality of Conference Programme
Quality of Presentations
Range of Speakers & Panelists
Quality of Conference Facilities
28%
6%
0%5%
GoodSatisfactoryExcellentPoor
Visitor Demographics
55%29%
15%1%
GoodExcellentSatisfactoryPoor
58%23%
15%
4%
GoodSatisfactoryExcellentPoor
55%
18%
11%
8%
8%
Met Expectations
Exceptional
Exceeded Expectations
Did Not MeetExpectationsDisappointing
Quality of Exhibition Range of Products & Services
Overall Rating of Event
52%
23%
17%
8%
GoodExcellentSatisfactoryPoor
Usefulness of Exhibition
33%
16%13%
11%
8%
6%
6%5%2% Previously Attended Event
Website
Advertisement
Colleagues
Brochure
Other
Magazine Outset
Invitation Ticket from Exhibitor
28%
26%
25%
11%
10%
None
YouTube
67%
17%
16%
Thermal PowerHydro PowerRenewable
First Heard About Event
Social Media Used
Area of Interest
Onsite Service
64%
18%
10%
8%
GoodAdequatePoorExcellent
Exhibitor Demographics
Exhibitor Demographics
36%
34%
15%
12%3%
To establish or improveprescence in marketTo establish new businesscontactsTo sell products and/or services
To support local agent or meetexisting clientsTo monitor activity ofcompetitors
60%29%
8%3%
Successful
Not successful
Very Successful
Not known
42%
22%
19%
17%
SatisfactoryGoodPoorVery Good
Meeting Objectives
Main Purpose for Exhibiting
Quality of Visitors
Visitor Attendance
37%
29%
18%
16%
Satisfactory
Poor
Good
Very Good
73%
27%YesNo
50%
33%
8%7%2%
Met Expectations
Did Not Meet Expectations
Disappointing
Exceptional
Exceeded Expectations
Establishing Future Contacts
Overall Rating of Event
Improving Business In Region
41%
35%
22%
2%
Probably
Defini tely
Probably NotDefini tely Not
Intend to Exhibit in 2014
Exhibitor Demographics
60%
40% YesNo