double-minimum potentials generate one-dimensional bonding, a different technique is needed to...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
Double-minimum potentials generate one-dimensional bonding, A different technique is needed to
address multi-dimensional problems. Solving Schroedinger’s three-dimensional differential equation might
have been daunting, but it was not, because the necessary formulas had been worked out more than a
century earlier in connection with acoustics. Acoustical “Chladni” figures show how nodal patterns relate to
frequencies. The analogy is pursued by studying the form of wave functions for “hydrogen-like” one-
electron atoms. Removing normalizing constants from the formulas for familiar orbitals reveals the
underlying simplicity of their shapes.
Chemistry 125: Lecture 10Sept 20, 2010
More Dimensions: Chladni Figures and One-Electron Atoms
For copyright notice see final page of this file
Preliminary
Reward for Finding Y
Knowledge of Everythinge.g.
Allowed EnergiesStructureDynamicsBonding
Reactivity
Single- vs. Double MinimumFor Hooke's Lawthe Blue Energy
is too Lowand
the Red Energyis too High.
The Correct LowestEnergy must lie
between these values.
Single-Mimimum
Actuallythis is aDouble-
Minimum.
The Blue and Reds are correct!
What if the wells were further apart?
Closer wells givelowered minimum energyand raised second energy
Both are~ same as
single-minimumsolution
“Splitting”
@ 0
.6Å
@ 1
.3Å
in A in B
Wells farapart
Wells farapartTo
tal E
nerg
y of
Par
ticl
e"Mixing" localized Ys for double minimum
Wells closetogether
in AB
Antibonding
HoldsA & B
together
Black line is energy
Blue line is
Bonding!lower Kinetic Energy!
Sta
bili
zati
onof
Par
ticl
e
reduced curvature
increased curvature
For bonding between 3D coulombic atoms, see Lecture 12.
Dynamics:Tunneling
Dynamics:Tunneling
In fact it simply involves the same negative kinetic energy that one sees in the tails of EVERY bounded wavefunction.
The word reveals naiveté about quantum mechanics.
The word "Tunneling" is one of my pet peeves:
It is misleading and mischievous because it suggests that there is something weird about the potential energy in a double minimum.
NegativeKineticEnergy
1.4 kcal/molesplitting
~ 410-14 sec to get from well to well.
Well-to-Well time 510-14 sec
Splitting (kcal/mole)Assertion : based on
time-dependent quantum mech.
Dynamics:Tunneling
Reward for Finding Y
Knowledge of Everythinge.g.
Allowed EnergiesStructureDynamicsBonding
Reactivity (coming later)
Morse Quantization
"Erwin" can find Ys for any complicated V(x)
7 Å
and rank them by energy / "curvature" / # of nodes
Don’t cross 0 in “forbidden” continuum.
Don’t slope out and away from = 0 in “forbidden” continuum.
Why is this not
satisfactory?
“Erwin” even
handles MultipleMinima
Erwin’s curve-tracing recipe won't work in more dimensions
(e.g. 3N).
But Schrödinger had no trouble finding solutions for the 3-dimensional H atom, because they were familiar from a long tradition of physicists studying waves.
When there are many curvatures, it is not clear how to partition the kinetic energy among
the different (d2 / dxi2) / contributions.
Unfortunately:
E. F. F. Chladni(1756-1827)
Acoustics (1803)
e.g. Chladni Figures in 2 Dimensions
SandCollectsin Nodes
Touch inDifferent
Places
Bow inDifferent
Places
dryice
Click for Short Chladni Movie (3MB)
Click for Longer Chladni Movie (9.5MB)
CO2
brass plate
Crude Chladni Figures
3 Diameters / 1 Circle3 Circles
1 Diameter / 2 Circles
4 Diameters / 1 Circle from in-class demo
Chladni’sNodal
Figures for a
Thin Disk
Portion inside outer circular nodeCf. http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/MembraneCircle/Circle.html
(1,2)
Chladni’sNodal
Figures for a
Thin Disk
Number of Diametrical Nodes
Num
ber of Circular N
odes
PITCH
47 Patterns!
"These pitch relationships agree approximately with the squares of the following numbers:"
Frequency ≈ (Diametrical Nodes + 2 Circular Nodes) 2
Note: Increasing number of ways to get a higher frequencyby mixing different numbers of circles and lines
8 Lines
4 Circles
2 Circles4 Lines3 Circles
2 Lines
1 Circle6 Lines
Num
ber of Circles
Number of Diameters
1 Circle2 Lines
e.g. Daniel
Bernoulli(1700-1782)
Great Mathematicians Worked on Chladni’s 2-D Problems:
2/x2 + 2/x2 + 2/x2
(abbreviated 2)the Laplacian Operator
s for one-electron atomsinvolve
Laplace’s “Spherical Harmonics”
(3D-Analogues of Chladni Figures)
3-Dimensional H-Atom Wavefunctions
(,,) = R(r) () ()
Adrien-Marie Legendre(1752 -1833)
() is the normalized“Associated Legendre Function”
Edmond Laguerre(1834-1886)
R(r) are the normalized“Associated Laguerre Polynomials”
with contributions from other old-time mathematicians
Y Table for H-like Atoms V(x,y,z) =sqrt(x2 + y2 + z2)
1
simplifies V(r,q,f) =r
c
Name Y byquantum numbers (n > l ≥ m)
or by nickname (1s, etc.)
Y = Rnl(r) Qlm(q) Fm(f)
product of simple functionsof only one variable each
and
(x,y,z) is very complicated
change coordinate
system:x,y,z r
x
y
z
n
er
f
q
Y Table for H-like AtomsY = R(r) Q(q) F(f)
1s
r r2Znao
Allows writing the same e-/2
for any nuclear charge (Z)and any n.
= K e-r/2N.B. No surprise forCoulombic Potential
x
y
z
n
er
f
q
Note: all contain (Z / ao)3/2
Squaring gives a number, Z
3 per unit volume (units of probability density)
Why r instead of r?
e-density at H nucleus (r = 0)
>1e/Å3!
Q: How much less dense is 2s at nucleus?
r r2Znao
exp-
r = 2Z
nao
r1H = 2
0.53Å
r1C = 12
0.53Å
All-Purpose Curveshrunk by Z; expanded by n
Å (1sH)
(0.26 Å)
0.5 1.0
Increasing nuclear chargesucks standard 1s function
toward the nucleus
0.1Å (1sC) 0.2
(renormalization keeps total probability
constant) 1/6
216(0.044 Å)
Å (1sC) 0.1 0.2
(0.044 Å)
Different Å scalesCommon Å scale
(1sH ~2 e/Å3)
+5
Increasing nuclear chargesucks standard 1s function
toward the nucleus(renormalization keeps
total probabilityconstant)
Summary r r2Z
nao
What would the exponential part
of……. look like?
+5
C2s
1sC(0) is 216 times 1sH(0)! E
lect
ron
Den
sity
(e/
Å3 )
H1s
C1s
0.5 1.00.1 0.2
Common Å scale
100
200
300
400
2
(but smoothed by vibration)
For Wednesday:
1) Why are there no Chladni Figureswith an odd number of radial
nodes? (e.g. 3 or 5 radii)
2) Why are the first two cells [(0,0) and (1,0)] in Chladni's table vacant?
3) Compare 1sH with 2sC+5 in Energy
4) Do the 6 atomic orbital problemsClick Here
2
2 2
Y Table for H-like Atoms
1s = K e-r/2
2s = K'(2-r) e-r/2
Shape of H-like Y
= K'''(r cos()) e-r/22pz zGuess what 2px and 2py look like.
Simpler (!) than Erwin 1-D Coulombic
x
y
z
n
er
f
qr cos() = z
Spherical node at r = 2
Planar node at z = 2
The angular part of a p orbital
Polar Plot of cos(q) [radius] vs. [angle]
0.5- 0.5- 1 0 1• •
•
••
•
•
•
= 0°
0.86
0.86
0.71
0.710.5
0.5
= ±30° = ±60° = ±45° = ±90°
+
2(q)
re-r/2 cos()
Find Max:
= 0
dre-r/2)/d r
-re-r/2/2 + e-r/2 (-r/2 + 1) e-r/2
r
2p Contour Plot
•r
•
?
(max for C+6 = 14 e/Å3)
Polar Coordinates
Exam 1 - Friday, Sept. 24 !Session 1
10:15-11:15 Room 111 SCL
Session 210:30-11:30 Room 160 SCL
Extra Review/Help SessionWednesday 8:00-10:00 pm
Room 119 WLH (McBride)
Atom-in-a-Box
Shape of H-like Y
Specialthanks to
Dean Dauger(physicist/juggler) http://dauger.com
Dean at AppleWorld Wide
Developers Conference2003
permission D. Dauger
End of Lecture 9Sept 20, 2010
(see Lecture 10 for description of Atom-in-a-Box)
Copyright © J. M. McBride 2009. Some rights reserved. Except for cited third-party materials, and those used by visiting speakers, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0).
Use of this content constitutes your acceptance of the noted license and the terms and conditions of use.
Materials from Wikimedia Commons are denoted by the symbol .
Third party materials may be subject to additional intellectual property notices, information, or restrictions.
The following attribution may be used when reusing material that is not identified as third-party content: J. M. McBride, Chem 125. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0