doppler radar in the 10 ghz amateurband part-l67.225.133.110/~gbpprorg/mil/radar/doppler_radar...are...
TRANSCRIPT
VHF COMM UNICATIONS 3192
Jean-PierreMorel,H8 9 RKRandDr.AngefWaseca,HB9 SLV
Doppler Radar in the
10 GHz Amateur Band
Part-l
For years, a large selection of com mercial intruder detectors has been available, based 0 11 the Doppler principle andopcral in~ in Ihe micro-wave ranee. Wewondered whether the simple 10 GHJ:transceiver with Gunn clements . whichwas so successfully used some years agoin the amateur radio world, couldperh aps be used in Doppler radarequipmen t. simila r to that used by thepolice to measure vehicle speeds on Iheroads.
As it tu rn ed out , we were able to obtainsome surpris i ll~ly accurate re:ldinw;wit h decidedly sim ple circu its! If devetoped a littl e further , t he equi pmentcould even he used to tr ack aircra ft andmeasur e (heir dis ta nce and speed.
If you wan t to, you can, for example,monitor the speed of your nelgh bcu r'sca r etect ron tcalty at any lime! So nowread on!
I.TilE RADAR PRINCIPLE
Radar is an artificial word made up fromthe initial lette rs of " RAdio Detection AndRanging" . which points immediately 10
the principle involved - determining thepresence and the direction of a " target"wirh rhe assistance of radio waves andmeasuring how far away it is. f or uuspurpose, the radar equipment's target musthe irradiated with radio waves, whichshould be as strong as possib le (fig. I ).
A small part {If the high-frequency energyreaching the target is absorbed by it. Themajority is scattered in many directions.and a small part is reflected hack to theradar equipment. We know this from EMEradio traffic (Fig.2),
I f the radar equipment receives an echofrom a specific object in the area 0 11 which
169
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3/92Ct'--- - - ---- ---'-""-"""'==""'-""-""'-
Fi~.l: The Radar prin ciple: thewaves transmitted by theRadar set ( I ) are scatt ered inman y directions by t heta~ct; 1I. fr action is reflectedback tn th e Hadar
it is trained . then there must be a target inthis specific direction. This is calledde tection.
If we now measure rile time elapsingbetween the transmission of the radarsignal and the receiving of the echo. wecan calculate the distance to lhe object knowing, of course, thai the radio wave.sare being propagated at the speed of light.
Fig.2: EME Mod e, based on thesame principle as Radar
1.1. Pu lse rad ar
Pulse radar always transmits short pulsesandlistens to the echoes in between pulses.The pulse durat ion is typically in theapproximate areaof one per-thousandth ofthe reception time. For the de.scriptions inFig.3. the so-called pul se-width repeuuonrate is thus:
X/(X +R)= U>-3.
The reception time is set in such a way thatthe transmission pulses have time to reachtargets at the limit of the equipment's
R=c· t/2
where:R = Distance from radar to targett = Time taken for signal to travel there
and backc = Speed of light (approx. 3"'108m/s)
This is called ranging.
cWe can distinguish between two types ofradar equipment:
...... Pulse radar--l' ew radar
Fi~.3: Pu lse-width Repet it ion Rat ereach cycle, C, consists of aTransmission Time, X, and aRece ption Time, R
170
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3/92
sentput ,;,;
nOI S8f loor-
ti me
o 15 Km 3"'m distarJ:l?
1.2. C W radar
,,,.•i ',
LowPRF
•High PRF
Fig,S: The Pu lse Repeal Frequency
must be matched to thedistance 10 be measueed : highfor short range an d low forlong range
CW stands for continuous wa ve. As thename indicates , the tran smitter is con tinu
ously sw itched on, hut the frequency isSWitched between two or more values. Thctime betwee n two frequency switchingsmust be sufficient for the signal to reachihc target and return (Fig.?).
II has probably become clear ihat CWraJ ar has nothing to do w ith the amateur
radio meaning of " CW" as telegraph ymode.
~
uu L_ol_ol
Fi2.4: Th e echoes rece ived from aT ran smission Pulse
range and then return. A longer receptiontime wou ld not make sense, as echoescorning in even later would be weaker thanthe receiver ' s lim iting sens itivity. It is thustime to transmit a new pulse (Fig .a) .
The pulse repetition freq uency (PRf<) is avery important pa ram eter in rada r technology (Fig.5). Fo r the radar measurement ofshort distances, a high pu lse repetitionfrequency is used because the echoes arcalready arriving short ly after the pu lse hasbeen transmitted, For large distance s, onthe contrary, the echoes nee d more time, so
that a low PRFis indicated. In practise, therepe tition freq uencies lie between one andseveral kli 1-
TIle briefer the pulse dura tion, tile higherarc the accuracy and the resolution of thedistance measurement . Short pulses allowseveral targets close to one another to bediffere ntiated (Fig.6a), whereas with
longer pulses they appear as only onetarget (Fig.6b) .
A magnetron is ideally suited to the
generation of m icrowave pulses with highenergy at a low pulse-width repetition rate.
171
VHF COMM UNICATIONS 3/92\t ,------------'=-""""""''''''''''''''''~
sen tpulse
t ime
r r, c ~ i v",d
~1 .I ~ iC S
-·, LI --C~,broad pulse
t ime
receivedpulses
onarrow pul se
Fig.6: If the Transmlsston Pulse is shor t, targets dose to one another can bedifferent iated. With 1f)1l~ pulses, on the other hand, the echoes overlap
2.PRINCIPLE CONSIDER ATI ONS
" be pulses from the classic pulse radar canbe replaced by bursts on one frequency,wi th continuous wave transm ission onanother frequency in between. It is not allthat simple 10 switch the frequency of amagnetron, except with special models. Soseveral magnetrons must be used and mustbe switched at high power, which is alsonot a trivial matter. Although continuousmagnetrons do exist (for example. thoseused in micro-wave ovens), using them inCW radar equipment is not easy either.
Th e travelling-wave tube (TWT) has manyadvantages ill comparison. lts frequencycall he varied by abo ut 10% and it is easyto modu late because it can be used as anamplifier. So complicated forms of signalcan be generated at the desi red outputpower, even in small signal stages, andthey arc then much cleaner than if anattem pt is made to modulate a magnetronaccord ingly (Fig .8).
With a travelling-wave tube, fur example,cohere nt pulses can abo be generated.Since the returning echoes arc then also
172
coherent, special filtering tec hniques canbe used in rho receiver which increase thesignal-to-noise ratio or tim range width.TIIC disadvantage of the trave lling- wavetube is tha t it call not generate theextremely h igh levels of pow er whichcharacterise a magnetron.
For the radio ama teur, of course, there isno ques tion of using magnetrons, becausein general they arc much too powerful.One exception covers the types which arcused in micro- wave ovens. They arccheaper than a 4CX250B, easily obta inable and also, if you buy a complete (old )
Wavef orm
II~ILKey ing
Fi2.7 : Waveforms of a Cont in uousRa dar
VHF COMM UNICATIO NS 3192
ILl -I n
t d '~ I',1/ IH~outre t , rG>1 ,1 '1/',/" I' \,I'/V'--"JV\,'II','/\/'-""\1\' \' '/111'11,}gllet' on I j I i I \
Fig)~ : Compa rison of'Output signalsfrum a Tra\ clli ll~ Wave Tubeand it :\l a~nctr()11{only a fewwaves arc shown out of thethousands in every pulse)
oven with them, equipped with a powersupply and with cooling. With somecomparatively simple modifications, thefrequency can be moved to the 13em
i"OO"""OO"'fR\!lx.. A~rece iver ~~T~
i ~:i~'"'[@-~Fig.9h:Pulsc Radar with Coherent
PC:\l
For those ama teurs who arc really "poor"(i.e: lacking money. not spirit), the Gunndiode osci llator would SCCIll to offe r theonly possibility for radar experime nts. Theobvious mode is CW o although we haveread ( I) that G UIllI diodes can be forcedinto an intermittent high-powered mode ifthey arc pulsed at an operating voltagewhich is higher than usual. But we did notinvestigate this type of misuse.
The lower microwave frequencies, such asthe 23cm hand, can he used for rada rexperiments. and normal ready-made FMtransmitters probably can 100.
111e only problem would he switching theaerial betwee n transmission and reception.You can certainly not switch a mechanica lrelay at a level of severa l kj Iz. So youwould have to switch to a separate aeria lfor the receiver.
It should also be mentioned that the firs tradar sets operated in the VHF range,which could still be done today in princi ple. Even the short-wave range is used forradar, because there you can sec " over thehorizon" (rcmembcr rhe Woodpecker!).
'73
----- -
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3192
§"
'~,L,_-±- ..R<ld,lt T
PF • G-- IW)
"P , -
\~--- --- - - - - - ----"""-''''"'''''''''''''"'''''-''''"''2.1. The Radar Equation
We shall now carry out a theo retical studyto determine the range width. The rangewidth depends on the power received more precisely, on the signal-to-noise ratioin the radar rece iver.
We shall make lise of the following values:
PE Transmission power (W)PR Received power (W)A Wavelength (m)R Distance fromradar to target (m)A Reflected wavecross-sectionareaof
target (m2)
G Aerialgain
The power reflected back per solid angleunit is:
._-~
Dl st ..-.ce
l"i~.IO :
The Radar Equation: only a smallfrac tion of the energy t ransmitt ed fromth e Radar set, Ra, reach es the target,T, and is scattered here in manydlrecttons (a). Because of this scatter,the small signal which comes back toth e Radar set is much weaker ( lOe)th an it would be if it had travelled theentire distance - namely 2R & in freespace (lOb )
(W)4 ,"
P,p••
A, the radar back scatter cross-sect ion, is ameasure of the target' s capability ofreflectin g radar waves. In warplanes, thisvalue is made as small as possible.
P4 is thus the back-scattered power persoli d angle unit:
P,
At the target, at a distance. R, from theradar, the power density is:
TIle target reflect s a power, P3, which isproportional to P2:
174
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3/92
G
;.' _ G
Finally. the following power density returns to the radar aerial:
everything ctsc remains the same you mustincrease the power by a factor of sixteen!
We shall now try to understand themathematics intuitively. As Fig.lOashows. the wave front is strongly curved atpoint Ra. As the distance grows, the radiusof the curve becomes larger and larger, i.e.the wave front becomes flatter and flatter.If a wave front is strongly curved, thepower diminishes very rapidly, which isshown by the steep sections of the curve inFig.lOb. If the wave front now becomesHatler and flatter, the power diminishesless and less, and thus the curve in r ig. lObbecomes less and less steep.
At a great distance from the transmitte r.the wave from is almost perfectly flat, sothat the wave can cover great distanceswhile losing almost 110 power. The powerwhich transports the wave moves in onlyone direction.
Now what happens if an obstacle (radartarget ) is in the way? Right - the targetscatters the waves in all directions again(f ig.Ina), so that once again the propagation behaviour seen at point Ra returns.There is again a very steep fall in the(small reflected) power (Fig. toe). Thepower which strikes the target is proportional to OR. The power which reaches theradar receiver is thus proportional to ';VR.or to 4,,1R. In certain cases, this very highattenuation can be circumvented by building a transponder into the target. Wheneverthe transponder receives a signal from theradar, it amplifies if and loads it withinformation • such as identification andflying height - and then transmits the signalback to the radar set. The power received isthen proportional 10 the fourth power rootderived from R (Fig. I I) . It is clear that wecan not make use of this possibility.
PEG' Ai.2
(4 ':1)3 R'
p~ • G . A- .- (Wlml'j(4 'If . R'
P~ .. G .A
(4 ':1 R)z .. RZP,
For a level wave front, the aerial thereforebehaves like an absorbent aperture with asurface. Ae, of:
The signal supplied by the aerial to thereceiver is thus P5 * Ac, which mcans that:
The range width itself is rhus the fourthpower root of the fraction to the right of theequals sign. Thc problem in constructingradar sets for large range widths becomesclear here. The range width is proportionalto the fourth power root obtained from thetransmission power! So if, for example.you want to double the range width. then if
The aerial gain depends on its equivalentcross-section, Ae:
If PR is the smallest signal usable for theradar set. then the maximum range width.R, can be read off from the followingequation:
175
k is the Boltzmann constant:1.374*10-23W/HzJK or JoulclK
T is the temperature of the object (K)B is the receiver no ise band width (l iz)
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3/92
where:
(f. ' -".C.C.:"""'"""""""-'-"""'-'~
Signal f roma radar
Tr ans onderSignal sentbac~t-to--1t he radar
Fil,: .l1: T he Transponder Prin ciple
No w, we still haven ' t got the noise factor ,n. which expresses the factor by which thereceiver noise exceeds the minimum noisepower es tablished by the the rmodyna miclaw . The tota l noise po wer is thus
TIle radarequation then becomes:
The radar eq uation also shows that the 4thpow er also applies 10 the receiver sens itivity. 111(: sensitivity has 10 he improved by afactor of 16 if the range width is to be
doubled.
The smalles t signal wh ich the receiver caneva lua te ca n also he expressed as the inputnoise powe r, N, fo r a given signa l-to-noiseratio, SNR:
A'Pt G' /..~ A
(411)3N . SNR
Now we elm write our the radar equation ina more co mprehens ive form :
PEG2i ' A
A' .. - ._ - - '-- -(4 JT)l • SNR • nkTB
The numerator still contains the reflectedpower, PH, and the recei ved powe r, PRohas been resolved in the denomina tor.
As thc final factor, we would now like tointrod uce the power losses be tween thegenerator and the aerial, as well as be twee nthe aerial and the receiver. The sum ofthese losses, L, comes into the dcnominator of the radar eq uation:
Th is should suffice for our purpo ses, andwe shall now use this radar equation toes timate the range wid th of our experimenta l radar set-up (Fig.12). LeI us assume thefollowing values for our 10 GHz blowthrough mixer with Gu nn elements:
The noise power, N. contains a fractionrecei ved from the aerial and a fractiongenerated in the receiver. The latter hasmany sources, among others the thermalnoise . Th is can be very close ly approximated by using the thermodynamic law:
R' •PE G2 ~,2 A
(4 :c}' • SNR . nkTB. L
176
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3/92
R
Fi2.12: The most decisive valuesfrom the Radar Equation
---~
P, !-fl- - .- ~<==.Y.-~ P3 ReS
~---
.J P,~, . -PR Ps
fhe Radar Equat ion
IOmW =: 1O-2W20dB (or more). » 100 ", 102
thus: G2 = t ()4
c/f= 3 * H)lI/ 1O * HJ9 = 30nunthus: /,.,2 =: 10-3
1m2
1.98 * 103
lOdS =: 1020dB =: IOU(not exactly slate ofthe art!)290 =2.9· 1()2 K8kHz", g * 103Hz
T =B=
n=
p =
G=
T his is an adequate band width. for if theDoppler frequency reaches 8 kl lz, thatcorresponds to a target speed of 459km/h .
1.=&111 = 4
Wc now introduce this value into the aboveradar equation and we get R = 140m.
Th at might appear somewhat optimistic forthe minuscule transmission power, but weshall lind out by practical experiments.Initially we want to try and increase ourrange width on paper. If we had ahypothetical receiver without noise andwithout losses. only the thermal no isewould remain and, with SNR = J, wewould obtain 1\ = lund L = 1 from ourradar equation, if the other paramete rsremained unaltered. giving R as J. 12km!
With a modern rece iver and small powerlosses, the rauge width will thus liesomewhere between rhc extremes 140mand Ikm.
We can now lay the receiver aside andjuggle with the other para meters instead:
a) lncreaslng Aer ia l Ga in
With a reflector diameter of 16(k,: m. wewould obtain a gain of about 40 dB. i.c. ahundred times the earlier fi gure, so that the
range width is mult iplied by len: R =140001 . Disadvantage: targeting with alarge aerial is very 1Il11l.:h more difficult.
b) Us in~ lower rrcqucucles
Th is makes the wavelength bigger - forexa mple about 10 times a."big if we use the23em band. The range width is increasedby the square root of 10 = 3. 16. Thus R =440m. Disadvantage : as we are sti ll eatenlaung on 20d B gain . the aerial becomescorrespondingly larger!
c) The last possib ility - tncreasmg t heIransmiUcr power
Unfortunately increasing the trans missionpower by (ell only increases thc rangewidth hy the fourth power root of 10.which is 1.77. So a range width of 140mbecomes 24~m at a transm ission power oflOOmW. or 442mat IW.or 787m for lOW.and so on.
A super Scm radar set with a transmissionpower of lOW from a travelling-wave tubeand a 1.6m parabolic antenna could have arange width of between 7km and Sukrn.depending on the quality of the receiver.
A 23cm radar set with a transmissionpower of l 00W and an antenna gain of
177
VHF COMMUNICAT IONS 3192
O.I ·1.9 m2
0.01 mI
o.ooml m20.5 m2(head-Oil)20 m2 (sideways-on)
A more precise RCS value can be calculated only for simple surfaces (flat surfaces. spherical surfaces and the like ). Amultiformobjec t call be see n as a corubinalion of many simple shapes . SOllie of themwill be good reflec tors . othe rs bad. To therada r set. such objects appear a." a co llection of bright spots between dark spots.
Depending on whether the waves from thevarious reflecting part-sur faces fina llyreach the radar rece iver more in phase ormore in opposite phase, the target is brightor dark, the ReS value large or small, Ifany of the structures of the target at all is in
lIuman being:Seagull:Fly :Aircraft:
cavmcs or intersecting surfaces. and theincoming wave can be reflected 10 theradar set (Fig .14).
But the RCS value is not dependent on thesize and shape of the target atone. Themater ial it's made of abo has an influence.Metal reflects m uch better than , for example. plastic or composite materials. Certainmateria ls which absorb microwaves arcused to reduce the RSC value of warplanes, as is spec ial shaping ( rcnc mbcr tbcstealth bombe r). Some aircraft optimisedin this way should allegedly have an RCSvalue no greater than that of a seagull!
If we now target a large (civilian) aircraftwith an RCS value of 50m2, the theoreticalrange width of our rada r wi ll be m ultip liedby the fourth powe r roo t of 50 = 2.6, Sothe original range width of 140m becomesaoou t 400m.
Now here arc a fe w examples of RCSvalues:
J--Fi~. 13: The Rada r Backscatter
(ross-sec tion, ReS, depends,a monR other th ings, on theorientation or the target
2 : :"~~~@~~_ReS 30 sq . m
OQOO
2.2 . Radar Backscatter Cross-section(ReS)
The higher the RCS value. the greater therange width. All range widths given aboveare based 0 11 all RCS value of 1m2. It isclear that , for example. a Boieng 747 has amu ch higher RCS value. Moreover , it isimmediately clear that the RCS value isalways variable, depending 00 the orienta tion of the target relative to the wave fron tof the radar signal (Pig. 13) .
The RCS value is also dependent on theshape o f ihc target. Flat surfaces act likemirro rs and reflect the waves very well .Sharp edges , SIOfS and points can act asaerials and reflect the microwave energyreceived. Multipl e reflections take place in
(f;----------"-"!:..'''''''-"''-='''''''~!:£20d B (super long Vagi) would have arange width 01' between 4km and 30km.
So we can see that it is theo reticallypossible to track aircraft - especially largeaircraft - and measure their spee d. Now it 'stime to deal with the radar backscattercr oss-section (ReS).
178
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3/92
a--;;i:;1"" ",.,---------- ':..&.
intcrsocli ngsur f aces
Fig. 14: Cer ta in st r uctures of a Radar ta rget can reflett particularly well.especially if their d imen sions a re of Ihe order of magnitude of th ewavelengths used; this creates particular;y bright spots in th e Radarimage
resonance with the radar wavelength, thisproduces a pa rticularly hright spot, because the reflect ion is particularly effeclive.
It should now no longer come as a surpriseto find that the ReS value of a movingtarget is cont inually varying in practise,because the phases of the wave fractionsreflected are continually being superimposed 0 11 each other. Variations in tile
propagation conditions ill the atmosphere,which arc expressed as fading with changing strength and time constants, also play apart. Each individual radar echo will thushave a different intensity. There will be anaverage value, with a random scatteringaround it.
Thus, when signals arc processed in thereceiver of a pulse radar, a number ofsuccessive echoes must be determ ined in
order to increase the accuracy of thepnx:ess.
2.3. The Dop pler effect
The Doppler effect is familiar to everyonesince rail and road traffic became widespread. This effect has become vcryimportant in astronomy (Fig.15), as theso-called red shift of spectra, on the basisof which their speeds and distances can becalculated on the cosmic scale.
TIle Doppler effe ct affects all electromagnetic waves, and this includes microwaves . Here it can even be measured quitehandily. The frequency shifted by theDoppler effect can be calculated using thefollowing formula • with the proviso, ofcourse, that thespeed of the object is smallin comparison with lhe speed of light:
179
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3/92(~ -'-="""''''''''>=10''''''''''''''-
Sun (same speedas Ear t h)
~/wh i te l S<,l i ghtwEarth-
speed
,~_'d"st ar
"
I ight col orshifted tored
Fi~ . 1 5 : The Doppler effect inAstronomy
I' .. f 'O-(1 - (vlc))
Fig.16: The Doppler effect in itsdreaded form. WithDoppler Radar the DopplerEffect is doubled when Ihere turn signal is rec eived
f = the frequency receivedf = the frequency transmittedv ::: speed of objectc = speed of light
The Doppler frequency, fd, is the difference between f and f " , i.e. the total valueof the frequency shift which the or iginalfrequency, f has undergone due [0 theDoppler effect.
111 11 we must remember that this formula isbased on the assumption that the Ire- I~ .. I • 2 VlC odcr v = ' 0 • c/2f
qucncy- f, is generated by the movingobject itself, not by the observer.
2.4. Doppler ra dar
In a Doppler radar system, the outputfrequency, f , is generated, not by themoving object, but by the radar set. Whe nit encounters the moving object, a Dopplerfrequency shift has already taken place.This displaced frequency, f' , is reflec tedback to the radar set and undergoes asecond Doppler shift. The reception frequency, [", thus includes a double freqlleney shift (Fig.16).
As we can sce from this fo rmula, thespeeds of the target, v, and the Dopplerfrequency, fd, are directly proportional to
f" = 1. (1 - (:? vIC)) t 'ig.17: The Alpha An~le mu st betak en into account in thecalculation of the speed
180
VHF COMMUNICATIONS 3192
Dop pler Speed SpeedFreque ncy HI. m/s k m/h
0 0 010 0.146 0 .52650 O.7:J I 2.633
100 1.463 5.266200 2.956 10.532500 7.315 26.33
1000 14.63 52.662000 29.26 105.32500) 73.15 263.3
Table.l: Doppler Freq uencies andSpeeds fOl" a Transmiss ionFrequency or 10.25 G Hz
one another. We can also sec why it isparticularly easy to deal with the Dopplereffect in the micro-wave range. For speedswhich arise ill practise, Doppler frequencies arc in the low- frequency range.able 1 gives some examples of this, basedon the assum ption that the transmissionfre{!UCIICYof our radar set is 10.25 GHz.
As we sec. an interesting speed range canbe covered usin g a handy receiver rangewidth. The Doppl er form ula was averagedto obta in the figur es for the table. Multiplying the freq uency by 1.463*U)-2 gives the
1" '" e cos o
or
1" _ cv =, --~
2 11005<0
If the radar set is standing at the side of theroad and the target is picked up when it is afew lens of metres away, cos alpha is soclose 10 I that the tenn can he ignored fo rpractica l purposes . If the alpha ang le is33.5°, cos alpha = 0.83. TIle speeds listedin Tab le I wo uld need to be multiplied by1.2 in such a C:ISC.
BRITISH AMATEUR TV CLUBTH HCLUB FOR ANYONEINTERESTEDIN AMATEU RTE LEVISION
PAST SCAN , SLOWSCAN, STUDIO WORK,src. 2500 MEMBERS WOR LDWI DE
QUAKl"ERLYJO URNAL· CQ- TV - WIIICHFEAT URESCONSTRUC n ON
PROJECTS. ATV NEWS, REGULAR FEATURESAND PCB & COMPONENTOrFERSTO MEMBERS. ANNUAL MEMBERSHII'QNLY£9.00
BATC, GRENEI lURST,PINEWOODROAD,11IGH WYCOMBE,HP 12 4DD, UK
181