don't discard your indomethacin yet

2
Don’t discard your indomethacin yet RB Cotton Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA The beneficial effects of surgical intervention to close the ductus arteriosus in premature infants with sig- nificant left-to-right shunting through this vessel were demonstrated over 20 y ago (1). About the same time, Heymann et al. (2) and Friedman et al. (3) demonstrated that closure of the ductus could be achieved pharmaco- logically using the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indo- methacin. The efficacy of indomethacin in this context was substantiated by a large multicenter randomized clinical trial that led its investigators to recommend indomethacin as the preferable treatment for infants with symptomatic PDA, reserving surgical ligation as back-up treatment for indomethacin failure (4). Indomethacin has also been shown to be effective in the prevention of symptomatic PDA when given within 24 h after birth (5). In a review of 9 controlled trials, prophylactic indomethacin was found to reduce the incidence of symptomatic PDA from 40% to 6% among newborn premature infants who weighed less than 1500 g at birth (6). Studies have also shown that prophylactic indomethacin reduces the need for surgical ligation (7) and may reduce the incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (8). In spite of the beneficial effects of indomethacin in both the treatment and prevention of symptomatic PDA, there are numerous adverse effects of this drug that compete with its overall effectiveness. Reduced renal function manifest by decreased urine output, decreased serum sodium, and increased serum creatinine is frequently observed following indomethacin adminis- tration (9). When indomethacin treatment fails to achieve ductus closure, renal dysfunction may become markedly aggravated when the adverse effects of indomethacin are combined with decreased renal blood flow due to the ductus steal of left ventricular output. Other adverse effects include decreased cerebral (10) and mesenteric (11) blood flow velocity, gastrointest- inal perforation (12), decreased cardiac function (13), impaired surfactant release from type II cells (14), and decreased platelet function (4). Paradoxically, the most problematic complication of indomethacin is delayed permanent ductus closure (the ligated ductus rarely reopens). Failure to achieve permanent ductus closure with indomethacin is espe- cially common in extremely immature infants who are less than 28 weeks gestational age. Narayanan et al. (7) reported that 41% of infants treated with indomethacin for symptomatic PDA and 21% of infants given prophylactic indomethacin required eventual ductus ligation. Arguably, the added morbidity related to delayed closure and the surgical procedure is at least comparable to, if not greater than the indomethacin- associated morbidity related to changes in cerebrovas- cular and renal function that are usually transient. Recent studies have indicated that another non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, ibuprofen, may be an effective alternative to indomethacin without many of the side effects of this drug (15–19). The report by Dani et al. elsewhere in this journal (20) confirm the efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen in both the prevention and treatment of symptomatic PDA in newborn premature infants. On the third day after birth, only 8% of 40 infants who had received ibuprofen beginning within 24 h following delivery had a significant PDA compared with 53% of 40 infants in the control group. Ibuprofen treatment of infants in the control group who developed a significant PDA by 3 d after birth resulted in ductus closure in 90% (19/21). Only two infants from the prophylactic group and one infant from the control group who had been treated with ibuprofen developed recurrent ductus patency. None required surgical liga- tion. The design of this study did not permit assessment of side effects normally associated with indomethacin. However, no significant changes in renal function were seen following ibuprofen when used either prophylacti- cally or as treatment for PDA. The study by Dani et al. has several limitations. Since the mean birthweights of the study groups were over 1200 g, the results may not apply to extremely immature infants 24–26 wk gestational age in whom indomethacin failure and indomethacin-associated renal failure are such vexing problems. The number of patients enrolled in the study was sufficient to establish efficacy of ibuprofen to prevent symptomatic PDA. However, a much larger trial would be required to enroll the hundreds of patients necessary to detect differences between the prophylactic and rescue groups in regard to adverse outcomes such as need for ductus ligation and the incidence IVH. Nor can inferences be made about the relative safety of ibuprofen compared to indometha- cin, since this study did not include an indomethacin group. The main limitation on the usefulness of indometha- cin is not the effect of this drug on renal function and cerebrovascular function, but the poor success rate of this drug in achieving permanent ductus closure in very immature infants. The efficacy of ibuprofen in regard to avoiding the need for eventual ligation of the ductus in extremely immature infants has not yet been adequately addressed. Published studies to date have not included sufficient numbers of patients who are less than 28 wk gestational age to draw valid conclusions in this regard. 1278 Commentaries ACTA PÆDIATR 89 (2000)

Upload: rb-cotton

Post on 26-Sep-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Don't discard your indomethacin yet

Don’t discardyour indomethacinyet

RB Cotton

Departmentof Pediatrics,VanderbiltUniversityMedical Center,Nashville,TN, USA

The beneficialeffectsof surgicalinterventionto closethe ductus arteriosusin prematureinfants with sig-nificant left-to-right shuntingthroughthis vesselweredemonstratedover 20y ago(1). About the sametime,Heymannetal. (2) andFriedmanetal. (3) demonstratedthatclosureof theductuscouldbeachievedpharmaco-logically using the cyclooxygenaseinhibitor indo-methacin.The efficacyof indomethacinin this contextwas substantiatedby a large multicenter randomizedclinical trial that led its investigatorsto recommendindomethacinas the preferabletreatmentfor infantswith symptomaticPDA, reservingsurgical ligation asback-uptreatmentfor indomethacinfailure (4).

Indomethacinhasalsobeenshownto beeffectiveinthepreventionof symptomaticPDA whengivenwithin24h after birth (5). In a review of 9 controlledtrials,prophylactic indomethacinwas found to reduce theincidenceof symptomaticPDA from 40%to 6%amongnewborn premature infants who weighed less than1500g at birth (6). Studies have also shown thatprophylacticindomethacinreducestheneedfor surgicalligation (7) and may reducethe incidenceof severeintraventricularhemorrhage(8).

In spiteof the beneficialeffectsof indomethacininboththetreatmentandpreventionof symptomaticPDA,there are numerousadverseeffects of this drug thatcompetewith its overall effectiveness.Reducedrenalfunctionmanifestby decreasedurineoutput,decreasedserum sodium, and increased serum creatinine isfrequently observedfollowing indomethacinadminis-tration (9). When indomethacin treatment fails toachieveductusclosure,renaldysfunctionmay becomemarkedly aggravatedwhen the adverse effects ofindomethacinarecombinedwith decreasedrenalbloodflow due to the ductusstealof left ventricularoutput.Other adverseeffects include decreasedcerebral(10)and mesenteric(11) blood flow velocity, gastrointest-inal perforation(12), decreasedcardiacfunction (13),impairedsurfactantreleasefrom type II cells (14), anddecreasedplateletfunction (4).

Paradoxically,themostproblematiccomplicationofindomethacinis delayedpermanentductusclosure(theligated ductus rarely reopens). Failure to achievepermanentductusclosurewith indomethacinis espe-cially commonin extremelyimmatureinfantswho arelessthan28 weeksgestationalage.Narayananet al. (7)reportedthat41%of infantstreatedwith indomethacinfor symptomatic PDA and 21% of infants givenprophylactic indomethacin required eventual ductusligation. Arguably, the added morbidity related todelayedclosureand the surgicalprocedureis at least

comparableto, if not greaterthan the indomethacin-associatedmorbidity relatedto changesin cerebrovas-cular andrenalfunction that areusuallytransient.

Recent studies have indicated that another non-steroidal anti-inflammatorydrug, ibuprofen, may bean effectivealternativeto indomethacinwithout manyof the sideeffectsof this drug (15–19).The reportbyDani et al. elsewherein this journal (20) confirm theefficacyof intravenousibuprofenin boththepreventionand treatment of symptomatic PDA in newbornprematureinfants. On the third day after birth, only8%of 40 infantswhohadreceivedibuprofenbeginningwithin 24h following delivery had a significantPDAcomparedwith 53%of 40 infantsin the control group.Ibuprofentreatmentof infantsin thecontrolgroupwhodevelopeda significantPDA by 3 d after birth resultedin ductusclosurein 90%(19/21).Only two infantsfromthe prophylacticgroupandoneinfant from the controlgroupwho hadbeentreatedwith ibuprofendevelopedrecurrentductuspatency.None requiredsurgical liga-tion. Thedesignof this studydid notpermitassessmentof sideeffectsnormally associatedwith indomethacin.However,no significantchangesin renalfunctionwereseenfollowing ibuprofenwhenusedeitherprophylacti-cally or astreatmentfor PDA.

Thestudyby Danietal. hasseverallimitations.Sincethe meanbirthweightsof the study groupswere over1200g, the results may not apply to extremelyimmature infants 24–26wk gestationalage in whomindomethacinfailureandindomethacin-associatedrenalfailure are such vexing problems. The number ofpatientsenrolledin thestudywassufficientto establishefficacy of ibuprofen to prevent symptomaticPDA.However,amuchlargertrial wouldberequiredto enrollthehundredsof patientsnecessaryto detectdifferencesbetweentheprophylacticandrescuegroupsin regardtoadverseoutcomessuchasneedfor ductusligation andthe incidenceIVH. Nor can inferencesbe madeabouttherelativesafetyof ibuprofencomparedto indometha-cin, since this study did not include an indomethacingroup.

Themain limitation on theusefulnessof indometha-cin is not the effect of this drug on renal function andcerebrovascularfunction, but the poor successrate ofthis drugin achievingpermanentductusclosurein veryimmatureinfants.Theefficacyof ibuprofenin regardtoavoidingtheneedfor eventualligation of theductusinextremelyimmatureinfantshasnotyetbeenadequatelyaddressed.Publishedstudiesto datehavenot includedsufficientnumbersof patientswho arelessthan28 wkgestationalageto drawvalid conclusionsin this regard.

1278 Commentaries ACTA PÆDIATR89 (2000)

Page 2: Don't discard your indomethacin yet

However, based on work by the Clyman groupimplicatingtheinvolvementof endogenousnitric oxidein ductuspatency(20,21),onewouldnotexpectthattheuseof a different cyclooxygenaseinhibitor is likely todecreasethenumberof indomethacinfailures.

Nevertheless,this study and others on the samesubjectprovide good evidencethat ibuprofenmay bepreferable to indomethacin in the prevention andtreatmentof symptomaticPDA. However,before theuseof ibuprofencanbeacceptedasthestandardof carefor thiscondition,asufficientlylargemulticentertrial isneededto establishan acceptableequivalencebetweenthe drugsin regardto efficacy.Eventhoughibuprofenappearsto berelatively freeof thecerebrovascularandrenaleffectsof indomethacin,it is importantto establishthat failure to achievepermanentclosureis no worsewith ibuprofenthanwith indomethacin.

When renal insufficiency accompaniesa failedattemptto closethe ductususing indomethacin,somephysiciansmight be tempted to use ibuprofen in arepeatedattemptto achievepharmacologicinductionofductusclosure.Thesafetyandefficacyof inbuprofeninthis clinical context have not been demonstrated.Inaddition,a failed repeatedattemptat pharmacologicalclosurewould furthercompromisethepatient’sclinicalstatus by postponing definitive closure by surgicalligation.

At the presenttime, the intravenouspreparationofibuprofen is unavailable in the United States.Thebioavailability of oral ibuprofen in the newbornprematureinfant is unknown. Oral ibuprofen shouldnotbeusedasasubstitutefor intravenousindomethacinin the managementof symptomaticPDA, either asprimary treatmentor prophylaxis,or asa backupdrugwhenadditionaltreatmentwith indomethacinis contra-indicatedby renalfailure.

References1. Cotton RB, StahlmanMT, BenderHW, GrahamTP, Catterton

WZ, Kovar I. Randomizedtrial of early closure of sympto-matic patent ductus arteriosus in small preterm infants. JPediatr1978;93: 647–51

2. HeymannMA, Rudolph AM, Silverman NH. Closure of theductusarteriosusin prematureinfants by inhibition of prosta-glandinsynthesis.N Engl J Med 1976;295:530–3

3. FriedmanWF, HirschklauMJ, Printz MP, Pitlick PT, Kirkpa-trick SE. Pharmacologicclosureof patentductusarteriosusinthe prematureinfant. N Engl J Med 1976;295:526–9

4. GersonyWM, PeckhamGJ, Ellison RC, Miettinen OS, NadasAS. Effects of indomethacinin prematureinfants with patentductus arteriosus:results of a national collaborativestudy. JPediatr1983;102:895–906

5. Krueger E, Mellander M, Bratton D, Cotton R. Preventionofsymptomaticpatent ductus arteriosuswith a single dose ofindomethacin.J Pediatr1987;111:749–54

6. ClymanRI, CampbellD. Indomethacintherapyfor patentduc-tus arteriosus:When is prophylaxisnot prophylactic?J Pediatr1987;111:718–22

7. NarayananM, CooperB, Weiss H, Clyman RI. Prophylacticindomethacin:factorsdeterminingpermanentductusarteriosusclosure.J Pediatr 2000;136:330–7

8. Ment LR, Oh W, EhrenkranzRA, Philip AG, Vohr B, AllanW, et al. Low-doseindomethacinandpreventionof intraventri-cular hemorrhage:a multicenter randomizedtrial [see com-ments].Pediatrics1994;93: 543–50

9. CifuentesRF, Olley PM, Balfe JW, RaddeIC, Soldin SJ.Indo-methacinand renal function in prematureinfants with persis-tent patentductusarteriosus.J Pediatr1979;95: 583–7

10. Patel J, Roberts I, Azzopardi D, Hamilton P, EdwardsDA.Randomizeddouble-blindcontrolledtrial comparingthe effectsof ibuprofenwith indomethacinon cerebralhemodynamicsinpreterminfantswith patentductusarteriosus.PediatrRes2000;47: 36–42

11. Van Bel F, Van ZoerenD, SchipperJ, Guit GL, BaanJ. Effectof indomethacinon superiormesentericarteryblood flow velo-city in preterminfants.J Pediatr1990;116:965–70

12. Kuhl G, Wille L, Bolkenius M, SeyberthHW. Intestinal per-foration associatedwith indomethacintreatmentin prematureinfants.Eur J Pediatr1985;143:213–6

13. Appleton RS, GrahamTP Jr, Cotton RB, MoreauGA, BoucekRJJr. Decreasedearly diastolicfunction after indomethacinad-ministrationin prematureinfants.J Pediatr1988;112:447–51

14. OyarzunMJ, ClementsJA. Control of lung surfactantby venti-lation, adrenergicmediators,and prostaglandinsin the rabbit.Am RevRespirDis 1978;117:879–91

15. PatelJ, Marks KA, RobertsI, AzzopardiD, EdwardsAD. Ibu-profentreatmentof patentductusarteriosus.Lancet1995;346:255

16. Varvarigou A, Bardin CL, Beharry K, ChemtobS, Papageor-giou A, ArandaJV. Early ibuprofenadministrationto preventpatentductusarteriosusin prematurenewborninfants. JAMA1996;275:539–44

17. Van Overmeire B, Follens I, Hartmann S, Creten W, VanAcker KJ. Treatmentof patentductusarteriosuswith ibupro-fen. Arch Dis Child 1997;76: F179–84

18. MoscaF, Bray M, LattanzioM, FumagalliM, TosettoC. Com-parativeevaluationof the effectsof indomethacinand ibupro-fen on cerebralperfusionandoxygenationin prematureinfantswith patentductusarteriosus.J Pediatr1997;131:549–54

19. PezzatiM, Vangi V, Biagiotti R, Bertini G, Cianciulli D, Ru-baltelli FF. Effects of indomethacinand ibuprofen on mesen-teric andrenalblood flow in preterminfantswith patentductusarteriosus.J Pediatr1999;135:733–8

20. Dani C, Bertini G, Reali MF, Murru P, Fabris,Vangi V, Rubal-telli FF. Prophylaxisof patentductus arterioususwith ibupro-fen in preterminfants.Acta Paediatr2000;89: 1369–74

21. ClymanRI, WalehN, Black SM, RiemerRK, MaurayF, ChenY. Regulationof ductusarteriosuspatencyby nitric oxide infetal lambs:the role of gestation,oxygentension,andvasava-sorum.PediatrRes1998;43: 633–44

22. Clyman RI, Seidner SR, Koch CJ. Combined prostaglandin(PG) andnitric oxide (NO) inhibition producespermanentclo-sureof PDA in pretermbaboons.PediatrRes1999; 45: 190AAbstract

Robert B Cotton, Departmentof Pediatrics, Schoolof Medicine-Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37232-2370,USA (Tel. �1615 322 3475, fax. �1 615 343 1763, e-mail. [email protected])

ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ

ACTA PÆDIATR89 (2000) Commentaries 1279