donor graphics webinar 050112 pdf
DESCRIPTION
Grizzard’s DonorGraphicsTM Media Usage Study, 2012.TRANSCRIPT
DonorGraphicsTM Media Usage Study
Leveraging communica:on trends to op:mize fundraising
May 1, 2012
This presenta:on must be viewed in slide show mode (F5)
1. The Digital Landscape
2. Donor Channel Preferences: Communica:on & Giving
Topics
2
Relevancy to fundraising
3
} Ac:onable insights along the way
Interac:ve Polls
4
Find out how your digital media use compares to the general popula:on
Digging deeper
5
"Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you
should be perfectly comfortable.“
-‐-‐ Bobby Bragan, Milwaukee baseball manager, 1963
Methodology: The study was fielded in February 2012 using Harris Interac:ve’s online research panel, which consists of millions of par:cipants.
The study was conducted among 3,509 U.S. online adults, age 18+, of which 2,432 were iden:fied as 12-‐month ac0ve donors (any channel) or digital prospects (opted in, like, or follow) of nonprofit organiza:ons.
} The maximum margin of error for the study is +/-‐ 1.7 & 2.0 percentage points respec:vely for each popula:on.
6
DonorGraphicsTM is a na:onally representa:ve study measuring digital behaviors among U.S. adults, as well as an aatudes and usage study for
donor and prospects to charitable organiza:ons.
THE DIGITAL LANDSCAPE
7
The Digital Landscape’s Fundraising Relevance
8
e
email subscrip0ons: Donors: +81%
Digital prospects: +77%
social media Use: Donors: +6%
Digital prospects: +16%
smartphone penetra0on: Donors: +17%
Digital prospects: +20%
tablet PC penetra0on: Donors: +65%
Digital prospects: +17%
The Digital Landscape
9
e
10 Base: U.S. online adults (n=3,509)
e
Email from companies & organiza:ons
87% of US online adults receive opt-‐
in email
(but its use varies by age)
The Digital Landscape
11
e
Social Media
12
82% of US online adults use Facebook, Twifer or YouTube at least monthly
(but its use varies by age)
(but its use varies by age.. and by
gender)
Base: U.S. online adults (n=3,509)
The Digital Landscape
13
e
Mobile – SMS Messaging
14
23% of US online adults have opted in to receive text messages from companies
or organiza:ons
Base: U.S. online adults (n=3,509)
Mobile – SMS Messaging
15 Base: Mobile text subscribers (n=788). Sta:s:cally significant at 99% confidence level.
While males and females have the same rate of op:ng in to SMS messages, females are more posi:ve about the
experience
29.4%
39.3%
Mobile – Smartphones
16 Base: U.S. online adults (n=3,509)
54% of US online adults own a smartphone
(48% for all US adults: Nielsen)
The Digital Landscape
17
e
Tablets
18
POLL: Do you own a tablet PC such as an Apple iPad or Samsung Galaxy?
Tablets
19
16% of US online adults own a tablet PC
Base: U.S. online adults (n=3,509)
Digital Landscape implica:ons
20
The Digital Divide (differences in technology adop:on across age and other demographics) is narrowing over :me, but is s:ll a factor in developing the right media mix:
• Email’s use is shiming, but it s:ll takes top billing for highest ROI among direct marke:ng channels (source: The DMA’s Power of Direct economic impact study, 2011) — Email is the founda:on for addi:onal opt-‐in communica:ons;
helps drive addi:onal channels like mobile and social through content and contact op:miza:on
• Younger demos are bellwethers for digital adop:on in older age groups — Social networking, mobile gaps are closing with increase in
penetra:on, requiring an integrated marke:ng approach
Digital Convergence
21
Mobility
Meets content
Digital Convergence implica:ons
22 Base: Opt-‐in email subscribers with a smartphone (n=1,715)
Seamless channel integra:on:
• Email content & crea:ve rendering and landing page func:onality: — Can you complete the call-‐to-‐
ac:on easily using a smartphone or tablet
• Mobile web site func:onality audit: — How smartphone friendly is
your website? — ?
Ø Smartphone users spend nearly 20% of their :me with email from companies or organiza:ons on their phone or tablet PC
PREFERRED COMMUNICATION CHANNELS
23
24
POLL: “In general, what is your preferred method of communica:ng with
friends?”
Communica:ng with friends varies widely (and predictably) with age
Preferred Communica0on Method with Friends
25 Base: U.S. Donors (online adults who are 12-‐month ac:ve donors) n=1,958 “In general, what is your preferred method of communica:ng with friends?”
But, the communica:on methods preferred with friends don’t translate well for nonprofit communica:ons
26
(In fact, they’re opposite)
Younger demos prefer more email & social communica:ons from nonprofits of interest; mail preferred by older
27
Base: U.S. Donors (online adults who are 12-‐month ac:ve donors) n=1,958 “Thinking about the charitable organiza:ons you support or have an interest in, what would be your preferred way to receive communica:ons from them?” [Alloca:ng 100% among six categories, including “other”]
Current versus Preferred communica:on
28
Base: U.S. Donors (online adults who are 12-‐month ac:ve donors) n=1,958 “Thinking about the charitable organiza:ons you support or have an interest in, how do you currently/prefer to hear from these organiza:ons?” [Alloca:ng 100% among six categories]
Opportunity to grow email communica:ons to befer align with preferences
29
Base: U.S. Donors (online adults who are 12-‐month ac:ve donors) n=1,958. An index score of 100 means that communica:ons are aligned with preferences. “Thinking about the charitable organiza:ons you support or have an interest in, how do you currently/prefer to hear from these organiza:ons?” [Alloca:ng 100% among six categories, including “other”]
Satura0on Opportunity
Donor-‐preferred implica:ons
30
• Op:mizing email programs: — Is your fundraising program incorpora:ng
engaging content and targeted contact strategies into the email program?
• Tes:ng: — Are you regularly tes:ng new/addi:onal
contact channels (including phone for lapsed reac:va:on) to balance preference with performance?
PREFERRED GIVING & ACKNOWLEDGMENT CHANNELS
31
Website, Mail :ed for preferred method of giving
32 Base: U.S. Donors (online adults who are 12-‐month ac:ve donors) n=1,958 “How do you prefer to make dona:ons to your organiza:on(s) of choice? Please select one. “
… But, the averages are masking some HUGE differences by age
33 Base: U.S. Donors (online adults who are 12-‐month ac:ve donors) n=1,958 “How do you prefer to make dona:ons to your organiza:on(s) of choice? Please select one. “
Donor-‐preferred implica:ons
34
• Preferred methods of giving : — Is your website op:mized for easy giving?
How many clicks are required from start to finish?
— Is it easy to give on tablets or other mobile devices?
• Targe:ng: — Are you able to target segments (age or gender), or at least
use your general donor profile as a guideline for your communica:on strategy? Leverage insights such as: § Higher sa:sfac:on with SMS (text) messages among females § Digital preferences for targe:ng younger audiences, offline for
older
Dona:on Acknowledgements
35
Base: Donors (n= 1,958) “What percentage of the :me would you es:mate you receive an acknowledgement of your dona:on(s)?“ “How would you prefer your dona:ons are acknowledged?”
Donors es:mate that they receive an acknowledgement of their dona:on about 72% of the :me. While about 22% don’t require an acknowledgement, mail and email are preferred by remainder
Avg. Annual Giving: $472
Avg. Annual
Giving: $654