document resume ed 396 199 cg 027 097 author killoran, … · 2014. 5. 14. · document resume. ed...
TRANSCRIPT
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 396 199 CG 027 097
AUTHOR Killoran, Katherine B.TITLE Alternatives to Incarceration: A Selected
Bibliography.PUB DATE Oct 95NOTE 40p.
PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131)
EDRS PRICE MFOI/PCO2 Plus Postage.
DESCRIPTORS *Correctional Education; *CorrectionalRehabilitation; Criminals; Criminology;Institutionalized Persons; Law Enforcement; ParoleOfficers; Probation Officers; Punishment;*Rehabilitation Programs; *Sentencing
IDENTIFIERS *Alternatives to Incarceration
ABSTRACTThe topic of alternatives to incarceration or
community-based corrections is presented in a selected list ofresources containing approximately 350 items. Included are English
language books, articles, government documents, reports,dissertations and conference proceedings. Textbooks have not beenincluded. The scope is international and currency a consideration inselecting material for inclusion: the most recent entry was publishedin July, 1995. Earlier materials have been included only when judgedto be particularly useful. Accession numbers for materials which arepart of document collections from the National Council on Crime andDelinquency (NCCD) and the National Criminal Justice ReferenceService (NCJRS) have been included when identified. An author indexis provided, as is a list highlighting the international material.The bibliography is arranged into sections starting with works of ageneral nature. Following sections are: (1) shock incarceration or
boot camps, (2) intensive supervision probation (iSP), (3) halfway
houses and day centers, (4) fines and restitution, (5) probation, (6)
community service, and (7) electronic monitoring and home detention.Items which address more than one of the above topics have beenincluded in the general section. (TS)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document. .
**************************************************************AA******
ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATIONA Selected Bibliography
Compiled byKatherine B. Killoran
Lloyd George Sealy LibraryJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice
October 1995
This is a selected list of resources on the topic ofalternatives to incarceration or community-based corrections.Included are English language books, articles, governmentdocuments, reports, dissertations and conference proceedings.Textbooks have not been included. The scope is international andcurrency a consideration in selecting material for inclusion.Earlier materials have been included only when judged to beparticularly useful. Accession numbers for materials which arepart of document collections from the National Council on Crime andDelinquency (NCCD) and the National Criminal Justice ReferenceService (NCJRS) have been included wAen identified. An authorindex is provided as is a list highlighting the internationalmaterial.
This bibliography was prepared by searching The NCJRS Databaseon CD-ROM, the Social Sciences Index, Criminal Justice Abstracts,Criminology. Penology and Police Science Abstracts, CriminalJustice Periodical Index, Current Law Index, and Abstracts on AdultCorrections 1983- 1990. In addition, CUNY+, the library catalog ofthe City University of New York (of which John Jay College is apart) was searched. The Sealy Library of John Jay Collegecomprehensively collects materials in criminal justice and is avaluable resource for the topic of this work. In addition, theLibrary has cataloged the valuable collection of documents from theNational Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD) making them morewidely accessible through the CUNY+ catalog. The CUNY+ catalog isaccessible to remote users via the Internet via TN3270 (TN3270cunyvm.cuny.edu : tab to the command line and type "dial vtam"<ENTER>. Clear the screen and type "LNAV"). Please note: Yourcomputer must have TN3270 software to access CUNY+. Choose theDPAC database for the library catalog.
The bibliography is arranged into sections starting with worksof a general nature. The following sections are: shockincarceration or boot camps, intensive supervision probation (ISP);halfway houses and day centers; fines and restitution; probation;community service; and electronic monitoring and home detention.Items which address more than one of the above topics have beenincluded in the general section.
1.) S ni.PAnuor NT OF EDUCA1 ION
[DUCATIONAL HESOUHCES 151 ORMAIIONCE NTED IEHIC)
El Th.', doc tir,pnt har. nevn repwdo.-c-I a
wq.W.1,91Mom ch,mip, haw t.... marivWIWWWWWWIMIRMIplally
.P.IIISOVWWMIT.I.OWstAdted.111/11'do, 01111,11l lu 11(d 1101 h1,11,0tlit11,001WW011111101pOky
1
14MISION 10 ,OOLCI AN1)DISSEMINATE 1H1'71 MAIEBIA1
HAS BEEN C.HANT TLY
K. Killor-A.,
BEST COPY AVAILABLETO 11-11 L INA AT MAL RES011ficA S
IN( ORMATION GENT IR RIC.)
BIBLIOGRAPHIES
International bibliography on alternatives to imprisonment1980-1989. (1990). Rome: United Nations InterregionalCrime & Justice Research Institute.
Sandhu, R.K. (1978). Community-based corrections. Monticello,NY: Vance Bibliographies.
GENERAL WORKS
Alternatives to prison.futurist. 28, 53-4.
(1994, January, February). The
Altschuler, D.M. & Armstrong, T.L.serious juvenile offenders: Acommunity-based programs. InR.S. Allinson (Eds.), Violentantholoay (pp. 187-206). SanCrime and Delinquency.
(1984). Interveningsummary of a study onR.A. Mathias, P. DeMuro,juvenile offenders: AnFrancisco: National Council on
with
and
Baird, C., Wagner, D. & Decomo, B. (1994). Evaluation of theeffectiveness of supervision and community rehabilitationprograms in Oregon. San Francisco: National Council on Crimeand Delinquency.
Barton, B. (1983). Sentencing alternatives. Juneau, AK:Alaska State Legislature, House of Representatives, ResearchAgency.
Benekos, P.J. (1990, March). Beyond reintegration: Communitycorrections in a retributive era. Federal Probation. 54(1),52-56.
Bennett, L.A. (1995, February). Current findings onintermediate sanctions and community corrections.Corrections today. 57, 86-89.
Bishop, N. (1988). Non-custodial alternatives in Europe.Helsinki: Helsinki Institute for Crime Prevention andControl.
Bloomberg, T. & Luchen, K. (1994, February). Stacking the deckby piling up sanctions: Is intermediate punishment destinedto fail? The Howard journal of criminal justice. 33(1),62-80.
Bondeson, U.V. (1994). Alternatives to imprisonment: Intentionsand reality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2
Branham, L.S. (1992). The use of incarceration in the UnitedStates: A look at the present and future. Washington, DC:Criminal Justice Section, American Bar Association.
Byrne, J.M., Lurigio, A.J. & Petersilia, J. (Eds.). (1992).Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Byrne, J.M. (1989). Reintegrating the concept of community intocommunity-based corrections. Crime and Delinquency. 35(3),471-499.
Cain, M. (1994, Autumn). Diversion from custody andrehabilitation of juvenile detainees: Managementphilosophies of the NSW Department of Juvenile Justice.Youth studies Australiaa/(1), 29-35.
Calco, G.E. (1994). The Dos Pasos project: Alternatives toincarceration for substance abusing women of childbearing age.American jails, 7(4), 44-53.
Carlen, P. (1990). Alternatives to women's imprisonment.Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Carter, R.M., Glazer, D. & Wilkins, L.T. (1984). Probation,parole and community corrections. 3rd ed. New York:John Wiley and Sons.
Colson, C. & Van Ness, D.W. (1989). Alternatives toincarceration: a conservative perspective. Journal of StateGovernment. 62(2), 59-94.
.community-based correctional programs cQx;ld be more extensivelyused within the federal criminal justice system: Report tothe Attorney Generak. (1982). Washington, DC: GeneralAccounting Office.
Community-,based treatment of offenders in Japan. (1990). Tokyo:Rehabilitation Bureau. Ministry of Justice Japan.(NCCD - CO 0420)
Coyle, E.J. (1990). Alternatives to incarceration programs inNew Zersey. Newark, NJ: Criminal Disposition Commission.
Davies, M. (1993). Punishing criminals: Developing community-based intermediate sanctions. Westport, CT: GreenwoodPress.
Doble, J. (1989). Prison overcrowding and alternative
2-eaten-C-e-5-1---Thelig3113--Q-L-the--PappleQL_Alaksima.New
York: Public Agenda Foundation.
3
Doble, J. & Klein, J. (1989). Punishing criminals, thepublic's view: An Alabama survey: An analysis of publicopinion. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.(NCCD - C&JD 1766)
Donnelly, L.F. & Clarke, S.H. (1990). North Carolina'sCommunity Penalties Program: An evaluation of its impact onfelony sent.encing in 1987-88. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute ofGovernment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Doob, A.N. (1990, July). Community sanctions and imprisonment:Hoping for a miracle but not bothering even to pray for it.Canadian Journal of Criminology. 32(3), 415-428.
Duffee, D.E. & McGarrell, E.F. (1990). Community corrections:A community field approach. Cincinnati, OH: AndersonPublishing.
Durham, A.M. (1994). Crisis ancl reform: Current issues inAmgricam_puniahment. Boston: Little, Brown.
Ellsworth, T. (Ed.). (1992). Contemporary communitycorrections. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Fallin, V. (1989, October). Gaining support for sentencingoptions. Corrections Today. 51(6), 66-72.
Feasibility of a drug court pilot project in Virginia. (1994).Richmond, VA: Virginia State Crime Commission.
Fields, C.B. (Eds.). (1994). Innovative trends and specializedstrategies in community-based corrections. New York: Garland.
Fogel, D. (1988). On doing less harm: Western Europeanalternatives to incarceration. Chicago: Office ofInternational Criminal Justice, University of Illinoisat Chicago.
Freed, D.J. & Mahoney, B. (1990, Winter). Between prison andprobation; using intermediate sanctions effectively.Judge45' Journal. 29(1), 6-11; 42-44.
Fromson, K.B. (1994, Spring). Beyond an eye for an eye:Castration as an alternative sentencing measure. New YorkLaw School journal of human rights, 11, 311-337.
Geerken, M.R. & Hayes, H.D. (1993, November). Probation andparole: Public risk and the future of incarcerationalternatives. Criminology, 31, 549-564.
4
Gendreau, P. & Paparozzi, M.A. (1995, February). Examiningwhat works in community corrections (Part of a symposiumon intermediate sanctions. Corrections today. 57, 28-30.
Golbin, J.J., Trotto, S.D., & D'Augusta, R. (1988). Planningand evaluation study of the Suffolk County DWI jailalternatives program: TWenty-four month report. SuffolkCounty, NY: Office of the County Executive.(NCCD - C&JD 1429)
Harris, M.K. (1986). Goals of community sanctions. Washington,DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Institute ofCorrections.
Hudson, J. & Galaway, B. (c1980). Victims, offenders, andalternative sanctions. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Hynes, C.J. (1993). DTAP: An alternative to incarceration(drug treatment alternative to prison). Journal of lawand policy. 1, 33-45.
Ingram, G.L. (1990). Offender accountability in the UnitedStates with custodial and non-custodial measures. InResource material series no. 38 (pp.205-224). UnitedNations Asia and Far East Institute.
Intermediate punishment: community-based sanctions. (1990).Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
Intermediate sanctions: Their impacts on prison crowding, costs.and recidivism are still,:uncle-ar. (1990). Washington, DC:U.S. General Accounting Office. (NCJRS 127383)
Jackson, H. (1994, Autumn). Keeping juveniles out of prison.Youth studies Australia. 13(1), 36-39.
Jefferson, J. (1994, April). Doing soft time: ?aced with risingcrime and falling revenues, governments are looking for newways to sentence and rehabilitate offenders ABA journal. 80,62
Johnson, W.W, Dunaway, R.G. & Burton, V.S. (1994). Goals ofcommunity-based corrections: An analysis of state legal codes.Mericia_j_Quraa7, siof criminal justice. 18(1), 79-93.
Jones, P.R. (1991, January/February). The risk of recidivism:Evaluating tne public safety implications of a communitycorrections program. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19,49-66.
5
Jones, P.R. (1990). Expanding the use of non-custodialsentencing options: An evaluation of the Kansas CommunityCorrections Act. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 29(2),114-129.
Junger-Tas, J. (1994). Alternatives to prison sentences:Experiences and developments. New York: Kugler Publications.
Killinger, G.G. (1978). CQrrections in the community:Alternatives to imprisonment: Selected readings. 2nd ed.St. Paul, MN: West Pub. Co.
Kinkade, P.T. & Jenkins, D.A. (1994, September). Problems inestablishing alternative programs in existing correctionalnetworks. Federal probation. 58, 37-44.
Krisberg, B. (1980). The unmet promise of alternatives toincarceration. San Francisco: National Councilon Crime and Delinquency, Research Center. (NCCD ST 009)
Landreville, P. (1995, January). Prison overpopulation andstrategies for decarceration. Candian journal of criminology,a2, 39-60.
Langan, P.A. (1994, May 6). Between prison and probation:Intermediate sanctions. Science. 264, 791-3.
Lauen, R.J. (1990). Community-corrections: Getting involved.In A. Dargis (Ed.), State of corrections: Proceedings ofACA annual conferences. 1989 (pp. 130-136). Laurel, MD:American Correctional Association.
Lauen, R.J. (1988). Community-managed corrections and othersolutions to America's prison crisis. College Park, MD:American Correctional Association.
Lerner, S. (c1990). The gooci news about juvenile justice: Themovement away from large institutions and toward community-Ipased services. Bolinas, CA: Common Knowledge Press.
McCarthy, B.R. & McCarthy, B.J. (1991). Community-basedcorrections. 2nd ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Pub.
McKillop, S. (1991). Keeping people out of prison. Canberra,AUS: Australian Institute of Criminology.
McKinnon, J.D. (1994, April). Turning a new eye on crime.(Alternative sentences for nonviolent drug offenders).ABA journal. 80, 68.
McShane, M.D. & Krause, W. (c1993). Community corrections.New York: Macmillan Pub. Co.
6
Mathias, R.A. (1986). The road not taken: Cost-effectivealternatives ,to prison for non-violent felony offendersin New York State. New York: Correctional Association ofNew York.
Middleton, K. (1995, March). Community alternatives reconsidered.Howard journal of criminal justice. 34, 1-9.
Morris, N. & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation:Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system.New York: Oxford University Press.
Nidorf, B.J. (1989, October). Community corrections: TUrning thecrowding crisis into opportunities. Corrections Today.51(6), 82-88.
O'Leary, V. & Clear, T.R. (1984). pirections for communitycorrections in the 1990's. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. ofJustice, National Institute of Corrections.
O'Leary, V. & Raleigh, W. (1994, September/October). Risk andpunishment in intermediate sanctions. Community correctionsreport. 1(7), 3-5.
Onondaga County (N.Y.) Citizens Task Force on Alternatives toIncarceration. (1979). Citizens Task Force on Alternativesto incarceration. Final report - phase one. Syracuse, NY:Task Force. (NCCD - CO 0384)
Parry, G & Walker, J. (1991, March/April). Intermediatesanctions in Canada. American Jails. 5(1), 120-126.
Petersilia, J. (1987, August). Prisoners without prisons.State Legislatures, 22-25.
Petersilia, J. & E.P. Deschenes. (1994, March). What punishes?Inmates rank the severity of prison vs. intermediatesanctions. Federal probation. 58, 3-8.
Petersilia, J. & Turner, S. (1989). Reducing prison admissions:The potential of intermediate sanctions. Journal of StateGovernment. 62(2), 65-69.
Pointing, J. (Ed.). (1986). Alternatives to custody. NewYork: Basil Blackwell.
Thareal alterdigtjaej_ausuggiag_ta_prsmte _community basedpenalties. (1989). London: NACRO, National Associationfor the Care and Resettlement of Offenders.
7
Record of proceedings: Community justice alternatives:Restitution and reconciliation. May 8-9, 1986. (1986).Ottawa, ON: Royal Canadian Mounted Police Science andTechnology Program Support Section.
Research workshop document. (1990, Sept.). Prepared for theresearch workshop on alternatives to imprisonment, EighthUnited Nations Conference on the Prevention of Crime andthe Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba. Rome: UnitedNations Interregional Crime & Justice Research Institute.
Rosenfield, R. & Kempf, K. (1991, October). Scope andpurposes of corrections: Exploring alternative responsesto crowding. Crime and Delinquency 37(4), 481-505
Schumacher, M. (1991). Community corrections. Journal ofContemporary Criminal Justice. 7(2), iii-145.
Bentencing:: Intermediate sanctions in the federal criminal justicesystem. (1994). Washington, DC: U.S. General AccountingOffice.
Shilton, M.K. (1992). Community corrections acts for state andlocal partnerships. Laurel, MD: American CorrectionalAssociation.
Smykla, J.O. (1981). Community-based corrections: Principlesand practices. New York: Macmillan.
Stanley, S. & Baginsky, M. (1984). Alternatives to prison: Anexamination of non-custodial sentencipg of offenders.London: Peter Owen.
State of Corrections: Proceedings. ACA annual conferences. 1991,Louisville. Kentucky. (1992). Laurel, MD: AmericanCorrectional Association.
Survey of intermediate sanctions. (1990). Washington, DC:U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.(NCJRS - 125317)
Topical bibliography: Trends in alternatives to incarceration,(1988-1990). Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Justice, NationalInstitute of Justice.
Travis, L.F. (Ed.). (1985). Probation, parole and communitycorrections: A reader. Prospect Heights, IL: WavelandPress.
8
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee of the Judiciary.Subcommittee on Juvenile Justice. (1983). Alternativedisposition to juvenile incarceration: Hearing before_theBubcommittee on Juvenile Justice of the Committee on theJudiciary. United States Senate. 97th Congress, 2nd session.on oversight of the juvenile crime problem. Camden,_ NewJersey. September 7. 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.
Van den Haag, E. (1991). Punishing criminals: Concerning a veryold and painful question. Lanham, MD: University Press ofAmerica.
Vass, A.A. (1990). Alternatives to_prison: Punishment, custody.and the community. London: SAGE Publications.
Von Hirsch, A. (1990). The ethics of community-based sanctions.Crime and Delinquency. 36, 162-173.
Wooldredge, J., Hartman, J. & Latessa, E. (1994, October).Effectiveness of culturally specific community treatmentfor African American juvenile felons. Crime anddelinquency. 40, 589-598.
Zvekic, U. (1994). Alternatives to imprisonment in comparativeperspective. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
SHOCK INCARCERATION
Aziz, D.W., Korotkin, P.H., & MacDonald, D.G. (1990). Sh00%incarceration programs follow-up study. Albany, NY: NewYork State Dept. of Correctional Services, Office of InmateMovement and Information.
soot camp: A twenty-five month review. (1990). Tallahassee, FL:Florida Dept. of Corrections, Bureau of Planning, Research& Statisticb.
Poot camp evaluation. (1989). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Dept. ofCorrections. (NCCD C&JD 1625)
Bottcher, J. & Isorena, T. (1994). LEAD: A boot camp andintensive parole program: An implementation and processevaluation of the first year. Sacramento, Cr-k CaliforniaDepartment of the Youth Authority.
Brown, S.D. (1994). South Carolina's shock incarceration forwomen. Corrections compendium. 19(2), 1-3,5. (s. carol)
9
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Burns, J.C. & Vito, G.F. (1995, March). An impact analysis ofthe Alabama boot camp program. Federal probation. 59,63-67.
Christenberry, N.J., Burns, J. & Dickinson, G.B. (1994,September). Gains in educational achievement by inmatesduring Arkansas prison boot camp program. The journal ofcorrectional education, 45(3), 128-132.
Coyle, E.J. (1990). Boot camp prisons: A survey of earlyprograms and some preliminary eyaluation eviaence. Newark,NJ: New Jersey Criminal Disposition Commission.
Ei.13.1,52ting_bQot camp prisons. (1994). Washington, DC: Campaignfor an Effective Crime Policy.
Fisher, I. (1994, April 10). Prison boot camps prove no surecure. The New York times, 1:37.
Keenan, J.P., Ruback, R.B. & Hadley, J.B. (1994). Measuring themilitary atmosphere of boot camps. Federal probation,aa(1), 67-71.
Landreville, P. (1994, August). Compensatory work programme, away of limiting prison use? The Quebec experience. TheHoward journal of criminal justice. 33, 236-245.
Latessa, E.J. & Vito, G.F. (1988). The effects of intensivesupervision on shock probationers. Journal of CriminalJustkce, 16(4), 319-330.
Littleton, R.M. (1989). Project C.O.R.E. boot camp in theTravis County jails. American Jails, 3(2), 65-71.
MacKenzie, D.L. (1994, June). Results of a multisite study ofboot camp prisons. Federal probation. 58(2), 60-66.
MacKenzie, D.L. (1991, September). The parole performanceof offenders released from shock incarceration (bootcamp prisons): A survival time analysis. Journal ofQuantitative Criminology 7(3), 213-236.
MacKenzie, D.L. (1990, September). Boot camp prisons:Components, evaluations and empirical issues. FederalProbation, 54(3), 44-52.
MacKenzie, D.L. (1989). shock incarceration programs instate correctional jurisdictions -- an update.washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of JusticePrograms, National Institute of Justice.
10
MacKenzie, D.L., Elis, L.A., Simpson, S.S. & Skroban, S.B. (1994).Female offenders in boot camp prisone. College Park, MD:University of Maryland Institute of Criminal Justice andCriminology.
MacKenzie, D.L., Gould, L.A., Riechers, L.M. & Shaw, J.W.(1988). Evaluation of shock incarceration in Louisiana:A review of the first year. Baton Rouge, LA: LouisianaState University. (NCCD C&JD 1267)
MacKenzie, D.L. & Piquero, A. (1994). The impact of shockincarceration programs on prison crowding. Crime anadelinquency. 40(2), 222-249.
MacKenzie, D.L. & Shaw, J.W. (1990, March). Inmateadjustment and change during shock incarceration: Theimpact of correctional boot camp programs. JusticeQuarterly. 7, 1.
Maryland. Division of Correction. (1990). Boot camp proceduresmanual: Division of Correction manual 300-1. Pikesville,MD: The Division.
Morash, N. & Rucker, L. (1990). A critical look at the ideaof boot camp as a correctional reform. Crime andDelinquency. 36(2), 204-222.
Nix, C.A. (1994, March/April). Boot camp/shock incarcerationan alternative to prison for young, non-violent offenders inthe United States. Prosecutor. journal of tbe NationalDistrict Attorneys Association. 28, 15.
Observations and proposals regarding NeW York State's shockincarceration program (1991). New York: CorrectionalAssociation of New York, Visiting Committee.
Osborne, W.N. (1994). Shock incarceration and the boot campmodel: Theory and practice. American jails. 8(3), 27-30.
Osler, M.W. (1991, March). Shock incarceration: Hard realitiesand real possibilities. Federal Probation, _55, 34-42.
Parent, D.G. (1989). Shock incarceration: An overview ofexisting programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice,National Institute of Justice.
Salerno, A.W. (1994). Boot camps: A critique and a proposedalternative. Journal of offender rehabilitation. 20(3-4),147-158.
11
Sechrest, D.K. (1989). Prison "boot camps" do not measure up.Federal Probation. 53(3), 15-20.
Second annual report to the leg.islature_: Shock incarceration inNew York State. (1990). Albany, NY: N.Y. State Dept. ofCorrectional Services. (NCJRS 125450)
Shaw, J.W. & MacKenzie, D.L. (1992). The one-year communitysupervision performance of drug offenders and LouisianaDOC-identified substance abusers graduating from shockincarceration. Journal of Criminal Justice 20(6), 501-16.
Shaw, J.W. & MacKenzie, D.L. (1991). Shock incarceration andits impact on the lives of problem drinkers. AmericanJournal of Criminal Justice. 16(1), 63-96.
Shock incarceration - shocKparole supervision, sixth annualreport to the legislature, New York State. (1994). Albany,NY: New York State, Dept. of Correctional Services.
Standards for adult correctional boot camp programs. (1994).Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
Strandberg, K.W. (1994, June). Are boot camps the answer? Lawenforcement technology. 21.(6), 68-69.
Udell, D.S., Morton, F.P. & Green, G. (1989). Oklahoma's non-violent intermediate offender program: A success inrehabilitation. Journal of Offender Counseling. 9(2),22-28.
United States.(1990). .. - h rwith separate_and additional separpte views (to accompanyN.R. 3445) (including cost estimate of the CongressionalBudget Office). Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O.
Vito, G.F. (1984, June). Developments in shock probation: Areview of research findings and policy implications.Federal Probation, 48(2), 22-27.
Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary.
12
Li
INTENSIVE PROBATION SUPERVISION
Armstrong, T.L. (Ed.). (1991). Intensive interventions withDigh-risk youths: Promisi g approaches in juvenile probationand parole. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Barton, W.H. & Butts, J.A. (1991). Intensive supervisionalternatives for adjudicated juveniles. In T.L. Armstrong(Ed.), Intensive ipterventions with high-isk youths:Promising approaches in juvenile probation and parole(pp. 317-340). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Barton, W.H. & Butts, J.A. (1990). Viable options: Intensivesupervision programs for juvenile delinquents. Crime andDel,inquency, 36(2), 238-256.
Byrne, J. (1990). The future of intensive probationsupervision. Crime and Delinquency. 36, 6-41.
Byrne, J.M. (Ed.). (1990). Intensive probation supervision: Analternative to prison in the 1980's. Crime and Delinquency,16.(1), 3-191.
Byrne, J.M., Lurigio, A.J. & Baird, C. (1989). qffectivenessof trie new intenQive superv,ision programs. Boulder, CO:National Institute of Corrections. (NCCD C&JD 1716)
Del Carmen, R.V. (1992). Intensive supervisionprobation: Fad or for keeps? In C.A. Hartjen and E.E.Rhine (Eds.), CorKectional theory and practice. Chicago:Nelson-Hall.
Erwin, B. & Bennett, L. (1987). New dimensions in probation:"" . - - -9 -0- le(IPS). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Fulton, B. & Stone, S. (1992, December). ISP overview:Evaluating'the effectiveness of inte.sive supervision.Corrections Today 54, 80+.
Gendreau, P., Cullen, F.T. & Bonta, J. (1994, March). Intensiverehabilitation supervision: The next generation in communitycorrections? Federal probation._ 58, 72-78.
intensive supervision program (ISP): Client characteristicssupervision outcomes - a caseload, comparison. Richmond,VA: Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Research and EvaluationUnit, Planning and Engineering Services.
13
Jennings, M. (1986). Intensive supervision of criminaloffenders. Juneau, AK: Alaska State Legislature, House ofRepresentatives, Research Agency.
Lemov, P. (1992, April). The next best thing to prison.Corrections Today 54, 134+.
Lipchitz, J.W. (1986). Back to future: An historical look atintensive probation supervision. Federal Probation. 50(2),78-81.
McCarthy, B.R. (1987). Intermediate punishments: Intensivesupervision, home confinement, and electronic surveillance.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
McIvor, G. (1992). Intensive probation supervision: Does moremean better? Probation Journal 39(1), 2-6.
Mande, M. (1988). An evaluation of Colorado's Intensive2upervision Program microform. Denver: Colorado JusticeDept. (NCCD C&JD 1347)
Petersilia, J. & Turner, S. (1991, Fall). An evaluation ofintensive probation in California. Journal of Criminal Lawand Criminolocry, 610-658.
Petersilia, J. & Turner, S. (1991, June). Objectivelyevaluating ISF's. Corrections Today. 53(3), 20,24+.
Petersilia, J. & Turner, S. (1990). Diverting prisoners tointensive probation: Results of an experiment in Oregon.Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Petersilia, J. & Turner, S. (1990). Inepvebigh-risk probationers: Findings from three Californiaexperiments. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Petersilia, J., Turner, S. & Deschenes, E.P. (1992, December).The costs and effects of intensive supervision for drugoffenders. Federal Probation 56, 12-17.
Polk, O.E. & Del Carmen, R.V. (1992). Intensive supervisionprobation: Fad or for keeps? In C.A. Hartjen and E.E.Rhine (Eds.), Correctional theory and practice. Chicago:Nelson-Hall.
Powers, K. (1991, December). Intensive supervision in thenorthern district of Ohio. Justice Ouarterly 8(4), 421-446.
14
Senese, J.D. (1992). Intensive supervision probation and publicopinion: Perceptions of community correctional policy andpractice. American Journal of Criminal Justice 16(2),33-56.
Tonry, R. (1990). Stated and latent features of ISP. Crime andDelinquency, 36, 174-191.
Turner, L.C. (1992, April). The case for intensive supervisionprobation. Corrections Today 54, 142.
Turner, S., Petersilia, J. & Deschenes, E.P. (1992). Evaluatingintensive supervision probation/parole (ISP) for drugoffenders. Crime and Delinquency 38(4), 539-556.
Wagner, D. (1993). Evaluation of the Florida Community ControlProgram. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office ofJustice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
Wiebush, R.G. (1993, January). Juvenile intensive supervision:The impact on felony offenders diverted from institutionalplacement. Crime & Delinquency 39, 68-89.
FINES AND RESTITUTION
Abel, C.F. & Marsh, F.H. (1984). punishment and restitution:A restitutionary approach to crime and the criminal.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Abel, C.F. (1980). Punishment as restitution: Definitions,justification and questions of equity. Doctoraldissertation, University of Maryland.
Albrecht, H. (1991). Fines in the criminal justice system. InK. Sessar and H. Kerner (Eds.), Developments in crime andcrime control research (pp. 150-169). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Allen, G.F. & Treger, H. (1994). Fines and restitution orders:Probationers' perceptions. Federal, probation. 58(2), 34-40.
Brown, S.S. & Willison, V.A. (1985). Restitution: A historicaland legal review. Albany, NY: New York State Division ofCriminal Justice Services, Office of Policy Analysis,Research, and Statistical Services, Bureau of Program andPolicy Analysis.
15
Butts, J.A. (1992). Restitution and juvenile recidivism.Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of JusticePrograms, Office of Juvenile Justice and DelinquencyPrevention.
Casale, S.S. (c1985). The enforcement of fines as criminalsanctions: The English experience and its relevance toAmerican practice. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
Cole, G.F. (1988) . Fines as a criminal sanction: Practicesand attitudes of trial court judges in the United States.1985. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium forPolitical and Social Research.
Colson, C. (1988, Winter). Crime and restitution: Thealternative to lock-them-up liberalism. Policy Review, 43,14-18.
Conrad, J.P. (1990). Concluding comments: VORP and thecorrectional future. In B. Galaway and J. Hudson (Eds.),Criminal justice, restitution. and reconciliation (pp. 227-236). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Dagger, R. (1991). Restitution: pure or punitive? CriminalJustice Ethics 10(2), 29-39.
Day fines in American courts: The Staten Island and Milwaukeeexperimerits. (1992). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. ofJustice, Office of Justice Programs, National Instituteof Justice.
Duff, R. & Meechan, K. (1992, January). The prosecutor fine.Criminal Law Review, 22-29.
Fines as criminal sanctions. (1987). Washington, DC: U.S.Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Fines in sentencing in New York State (1985). Albany, NY:New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services,Office of Policy Analysis, Research, and StatisticalServices, Bureau of Program and Policy Analysis.
Finn, P. (1992). Making the offender foot the bill: A Texasprogram. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, NationalInstitute of Justice.
Galaway, B. (1988). Restitution as innovation or unfilledpromise? Federal Probation, 52(3), 3-14.
16
Galaway, B. (1984). Public acceptance of restitution as analternative to imprisonment for property offendersmicroform: A survey. Wellington, New Zealand: Dept. ofJustice, Planning and Development Division.(NCCD - C&JD 0048)
Galaway, B. & Hudson, J. (Eds.). (1990). Criminal justice,restitution and reconciliation. Monsey, NY: CriminalJustice Press.
Galaway, B., Hudson, J. & Novack, S. (1983). Restitution andcommunity service: An annotated bibliography. Waltham, MA:Brandeis University.
Glaser, D. (1988). Use and effectiveness of fines, jail andprobation in municipal courts. Los Angeles: Center forResearch on Crime and Social Control, Social SciencesResearch Institute, University of Southern California.(NCCD - C&JD 1638)
Gordon, M.A. & Glaser, D. (1991, November). The use and effectsof financial penalties in municipal courts. Criminology 29,651-76.
Hillsman, S.T. (1990). Fines and day fines. In M. Tonry and N.Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: Ap annual review ofresearch (v.12, pp.49-98). Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.
Hillsman, S.T. (1987). Improving the use and administrationof criminal fines microform: A report of the Richmond. .9
9 . m.New York: Vera Institute of Justice. (NCCD C&JD 1071)
Hillsman, S.T. (1984). Fines in criminal sentencing: A studyof the use of the fine as a cripinal sanction. Washington,DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Hudson, J. (1980). Restitution <microform>: A viablealternative to incarceration operated by Financial anddebt counseling services. Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Duluth, MN:School of Social Development. (NCCD DI 0038)
Hudson, J. & Galaway, B. (1989). Financial restitution:Toward an evaluable program model. Canadian Journal ofCriminology. 31(1), 1-18.
International Symposium on Restitution, Minneapolis, 1975.(1977) . Restitution _in criminal justice: A criticalassessment of sanctions: Papers. Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
17
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Jacobs, S. & Moore, D.C. (1994). Successful restitution as apredictor of juvenile recidivism. Juvenile and family courtjournal, 45(1), 3-14.
Lawrence, R. (1990). Restitution as a cost-effectivealternative to incarceration. In B. Galaway and J. Hudson(Eds.), Criminal justice. restitution, and reconciliation(pp. 207-216). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Lawrence, R. (1990, Spring). Diverting offenders from prison torestitution centers. Journal of Crime and Justice, 13(1),27-41.
Mair, G. & Lloyd, C. (1989). Money payment supervision oKders:Prolzation policy and practice. London: HMSO Books.
McDonald, D. (1988). Restitution and csymmunity service.Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Instituteof Justice.
McDonald, D.C., Greene, J. & Worzella, C. (1992). Day finesin American courts:3he Staten Isl4nd and Milwaukeeexperiments. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice,National Institute of Justice.
McEniry, M.C. (1979). Restitution <microform>: A dynamic andchallenging alternative from Wisconsin's juvenile justicesystem. Madison, WI. (NCCD JD 0624)
Moxon, D. (1992). Developments in the use of compensationorders in magistrates' courts since. October_1988. London:HMSO.
Moxon, D., Sutton, M. & Hedderman, C. (1990). Unit fines:Experiments in four courts. London: Home Office.
Mullaney, F.G. (1988). Economic sanctions in communItycorrections: Wash., DC: National Institute of Corrections.(NCCD C&JD 1570)
Partridge, A. (1985). The crime control and fine enforcementacsa_Qf_12$41._a_aympaia. Washington, DC: Federal JudicialCenter.
Paying for crime. (1989). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Polinsky, A.M. & Shavell, S. (1992, April). Enforcement costsand the optimal magnitude and probability of fines. Journalat_LAW_and_E=4Mica_15., 133-48.
18
Porter, W.H. (c1989). Crime on time? : An impact study on theeffect of the 1971 Tate vs. Short United States SupremeCourt decision on the administration of justice in fourMississippi cities, Biloxi. Gulfport. Petal. and Collins.Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.Reed, D.E. (c1983). Holding youth accountable: A manual fororganizing a community based restitution program fordelinquent youth: A report ot the Chicago Law Enforcementgroup. Chicago: The Group.
SyTposium ollRestitution and Community Service_ Sentencing(1980). Fourth symposium gn restitution and communityService sentencing. Minneapolis. Minnesota, September24-26. 1980. Duluth, MN: Social Development Associates.(NCCD - ST 0115)
Tackling fine default. (1990). London: Prison Reform Trust.Weitekamp, E.G. (c1989). Restitution: A new paradigm of
social control.Pennsylvania.
Doctoral dissertation, University of
White, A.G. (1977). Restitution as a criminal sentence: Agelected bibliography. Monticello, IL: Council ofPlanning Librarians.
Winterfield, L.A. (1993). The Staten Island Day-Fine Project.Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of JusticePrograms, National Institute of Justice.
Wright, M. & Galaway, B., (Eds.). (1989). Mediation andcriminal justice: Victims, offenders and community.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
HALFWAY HOUSES AND DAY CENTERS
Community residential corrections program: An internationalstudy. (1985). Lincoln, NE: The Center.
Diggs, D.W. & Pieper, S.L. (1994, March). Using day reportingcenters as an alternative to jail. Federal probation. 58,9-12.
. C. 90MR.9 ti't 9P°....1.1: S. 9 9 itLINI a cage study. (c1975). Lexington, : LexingtonBooks.
19
Federal guidance needed if haltwayjaQuaga_are_ta_ta_sl_sjAscaaiv AAltt
Administration. Department of Justice: Report to theCongress. (1975). Washington, DC: U.S. GeneralAccounting Office.
Hartman, D.J., Friday, P.C. & Minor, K.I. (1994).Residential probation: a seven-year follow-up study ofhalfway house discharges. Journal of criminal justice. 22,503-15.
Hicks, N. (1987, October). New relationship: Halfway housesand corrections. acaregtAs2nLs&papenn(4), 1, 5-8.
Johnson, C. (1978). Halfway houses: A selected bib1iography.Washington, DC: The Institute.
Keller, O.J. (1970). Falfway houses: community-centeredcorrection and treatment. Lexington, MA: Heath LexingtonBooks.
Latessa, E.J. & Travis, L.P. (1991). Halfway house orprobation: A comparison of alternative dispositions.Journal of Crime and Justice 14(1), 53-75.
McCarthy, R.J. (1990, June). Hampden County Day ReportingCenter: Three years, success in supervising sentencedindividuals in the community. Large Jail Network 2(1),6-7.
Mair, G. & Nee, C. (1992). Day centre reconviction rates.British Journal of Criminology 32(3), 329-339.
Mair, G. (1988). Probation day centers. London: GreatBritain Home Office Research and Planning UnitInformation Unit.
Parent, D.G. (1990). Day reporting centerz for crimipalaffsinciera. .=-a_siellariplay_e_jancilygis_sff_sixisting programs.Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Instituteof Justice.
Petersen, W.C. (1990). Carrelataa_sd_stucggaz_in_g_sarressagn_allialfway house for first time male felons. Doctoraldissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.
Warner, J.R. (1979). Oroup homes for juvenile delinquents.status offenders, and pre-delinquents: A bibliQgrAphy.Monticello, NY: Vance Bibliographies.
20
Whelan, C.S. (c1975). Community oriented correctionalprograms: Partial confinement And temporary release in NewYork State. New York: Dept. of Public Affairs, CommunityService Society of New York.
Wozner, Y. & Arad-Davidson, B. (1994). Community hostels: Analternative to rehabilitating young offenders. Journal ofoffender rehabilitation. 20(3-4), 37-60. (ISRAEL)
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Albrecht, H. & Schadler, W. (Eds.). (1986). Communityservice: knew option in punishing offenders in Europe.Freiburg, GER: Max Planck Institute for Foreign and PenalLaw.
Allen, G.F. & Treger, H. (1990, September). Community serviceorders in federal probation: Perceptions of probationersand host agencies. Federal Probation 54, 8-14.
Bazemore, G. & Maloney, D. (1994, March). Rehabilitatingcommunity service: Toward restorative service sanctionsin a balanced justice system. Federal probation. 58, 24-35.
Besse, A. (1985). Community service corps:A correctionsinitiative. Madison, WI: Division of Corrections.
Community service restitution programs for alcohol relatedtraffic offenders. (1986). 3 vols. Washington, DC: U.S.Dept. of Transportation, National Highway Traffic SafetyAdministration.
Cooper, G. (1981). AWaluation of the community servicerestitution program: A cluster analysis. Denver: SocialSystems Research and Evaluation Division, Denver ResearchInstitute, University of Denver.
Feeley, M.M., Berk, R.A., & Campbell, A. (1992, November).Between two extremes: An examination of the efficiency andeffectiveness of community service orders and theirimplications for the U.S. sentencing guidelines. SouthernCalifornia Law Review 66, 155-207.
Feis, C.L. (c1990).An_experimental evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, MichiganState University.
21
Griffiths, C.T. & Patenaude, A.L. (1990). The use ofcommunity service orders and restitution in the CanadianNorth: The prospects and problems of "localized"corrections. In B. Galaway and J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminaljustice. restitution, and reconciliation (pp. 145-153).Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Hanson-Stone, J.A. (c1990). Community service by firstoffenders: Ego dewlopment thrpugh symbolic restitution.Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin--Madison.
Hoggarth, E.A. (1991). Selection for commuhity service orders.Brookfield, VT: Darmouth Publishing Co.
Hudson, J., & Galaway, B. (1990, June). Community service:Toward program definition. Federal Probation. 54(2),3-9.
Implementing community service: The referral process. (1989).Federal Probation 53(1), 3-9.
Knapp, M., Robertson, E. & McIvor, G. (1992, February).Comparative costs of community service and custody inScotland. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 31(1),8-30.
Maher, R.J. (1994, June). Community service: A good idea thatworks. Federal probation. 58, 20-23.
Maher, R.J. & Dufour, H.E. (1987). Experimenting withcommunity service: A punitive alternative to incarceration.Federal Probation. 51, 22-27.
McDonald, D. (1988). Estitution and community service.Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Instituteof Justice.
McDonald, D.serviceRutgers
McIvor, G.Howard
McIvor, G.Roward
(1986). ?unishment without walls; Communitysentences in_New York City. New Brunswick, NJ:University Press.
(1991, February). Community service work placements.Journal of Criminal Justice 30(1), 19-29.
(1990). Community service and custody in Scotland.Journal of Criminal Justice. 29(2), 101-113.
McLagan, J. (1992, January-February). Sentencing to service:A project of the Minnesota Department of Corrections andthe Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Americanai1a_5(6), 28-30, 32.
22
Nutter, R.W., Hudson, J., & Galaway, B. (1989). Qommunityservice and victim offender contact: An aunotated andcross-referenced bibliography. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept.of Justice, National Institute of Justice.(NCCD C&JD 1634)
Pease, K. (1985). Community service orders. In M. Tonry andN. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: ap annual review ofresearch (pp.51-94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pease, K. (1981). Community service orders: A first decade ofpromise. London: Howard League for Penal Reform.
Petersilia, J. (1985). Community supervision: Trends andcritical issues. Crime and Delinquency. 31, 349-92.
Rubin, H.T. (1993, December/January 1994). Let's do morewith monetary restitution and community work service.Community corrections report. 1(2), 9-11.
Skinns, C.D. (1990). Community service practice. pritishJournal of Criminology. 30(1), 65-80.
Statistics on community service orders. (1992). Croydon,Surrey, ENG: Great Britain Home Office StatisticalDepartment.
Young, W. (1979). Community service orders: The developmentand use of a new penal measure. London: Heinemann.
PROBATION
Allen, H.E., Eskridge, C.W., Latessa, E.J. & Vito, G.F. (1985).2rokation_and_parole_ia_Amarica. New York: Free Press.
Annotated literature remialt_fgx_theAbtjanal_EyAllatign_-II I "Oz f 0, f
(1979). Bethesda, MD: System Sciences.
Champion, D.J. (1990). probation and parole in the UnitedStates. Columbus, OH: Merrill Pub. Co.
Champion, D.J. (1988). Felony probation: Problems and prospects.New York: Praeger.
Cochran, D. (1989, October). Corrections' catch 22.Corrections Todea 51(6), 16-18.
23
Creamer, A. (1992).the establishment of alternative to custody schemes inScotland. Edinburgh: Central Research Unit, 'ScottishOffice.
4 44 V
Creamer, A. (1992). The probation alternative: A study of thef f IP... n n n in
Edinburgh: Central Research Unit, Scottish Office.
Cromwell, P., Killinger, G., Kerper, H. & Walker, C. (1985).Probation and parole in the criminal justice system. St.Paul, MN: West.
S.
Cunniff, M.A. & Shilton, M.K. (1991). Variations on felonyprobation: Persons under supervision in 32 urban andsuburban counties. Washington, DC: National Association ofCriminal Justice Planners.
Erwin, B.S. (1986). Turning up the heat on probationers inGeorgia. Federal Probation. 50(2), 17-24.
Featherstone, B. (1987). "There is an alterrative": Thepromotional work of the pro)QAtion service and socialservices departments: aLrevievt and guide to better practice.London: Prison Reform Trust.
Harris, R. (1992). Crime. criminal justice and the probationservice. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
Humphrey, C. & Pease, K. (1992, February). Effectivenessmeasurement in probation: A view from the troops.ilgoward Journal of Criminal Justice 31(1), 31-52.
Hensman, M.J. (1990). Rrobation seryice work in the community:Report of an efficiency and _effectiveness _developmentinspection in ten probation areas. London: HM Inspectorateof Probation.
Klein, A.R. (1990, Winter). Make probation work. Judges'Journal. 29(1), 13-17, 47-48.
Latessa, E.F. & Travis, L.F. (1991). Halfway house orprobation: A comparison of alternative dispositions.Journal of Crime and Justice. 14(1), 53-75.
Lindner, C. (1981, Fall). The utilization of day-eveningcenters as an alternative to secure detention of juveniles.Journal of Probation and Parole. 13, 12-18.
Lindner, C. & Wagner, R. (1983, March). The ocean tidesexperiment: Treatment of serious juvenile offenders in anopen residential setting. Federal Probation. 47, 26-32.
24
Mair, G. (1968). Probation day centres. London: HMSO Books.
Moran, T.K. & Lindner, C. (1985, Spring). Probation and thehi-technology revolution: Is a reconceptualization of thetraditional probation role model inevitable? CriminalJustice Review. 10(1), 25-32.
Parent, D.G. (1990, September). Pay reporting centers forcriminal offenders a descriptive analysis of existingprograms. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, NationalInstitute of Justice.
Petersilia, J. (1990). When probation becomes more dreadedthan prison. Federal Probation. 54(1), 36-43.
Raynor, P. (1988). Probation as an alternative to custody: Acase study. Brookfield, VT: Avebury,
Rumgay, J. (1989). Talking tough: Empty threats in probationpractice. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 28(3),177-188.
Sandhu, R.K. (1979). Pardon. parole and probation.Monticello, NY: Vance Bibliographies.
Sluder, R.D., Sapp, A.D. & Langston, D.C. (1994, June). Guidingphilosophies for probation in the 21st century. Federal,probation. 58(2), 3-10.
Smykla, J.O. (1984). Probation am', parole: Crime control in thecommunity. New York: Macmillan.
Stewart, J.K. (1986). Felony probation: An ever increasingrisk. Corrections Today. 48(8), 94-102.
Supervision and punishment in the community: Summary of aframework for action. (1990). London: Home Office.
Tomkins, D.L. (1964). Probation since World War II: Abibliography. Berkeley, CA: Institute of GovernmentalStudies, University of California.
Vass, A.A. & Weston, A. (1990). Probation day centres as analternative to custody: A "trojan horse" examined. pritish;Ournal of Criminology. 30(2), 189-206.
Whitehead, J.T. (1991). The effectiveness of felony probation:Results from an eastern state. Justice Ouarterly. 8(4),525-543.
Whitehead, P. (1990). cognuaity_aupp=itaisan_22r_sglauslara_L_Anew model of probation. Brookfield, VT: Avebury.
25
Whitehead, P., Turver, N. & Wheatley, J. (1991). Probation.temporary release schemes and reconviction theory andpractice. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Publishing Co.
HOME DETENTION AND ELECTRONIC MONITORING
Archambeault, W.G. & Archambeault, B.J. (1989). COIRUtaKain_criminal justice administration and management,:Introduction to emerging issues and applications.Cincinnatti: Anderson Publishing.
Archambeault, W. & Gould, L. (1990). The computerassisted monitoring of offenders (CAMO): An emergingalternative to incarceration. In F. Schmalleger (Ed.),Computers in criminal justice: Issues and applications.Bristol, IN: Wyndham Hall Press.
Ball, R., Huff, C.R. & Lilly, J.R. (1987) . House arrestandC-arLeatia.t....152ffia. BeverlyHills, CA: Sage Publications.
Baumer, T.L., Maxfield, M.G. & Mendelson, R.I. (1993, March).A comparative analysis of three electronically monitoredhome detention programs. Justice quarterly. 10(1), 121-142.
Baumer, T.L. & Mendelson, R.I. (1990). Final report: Theelectronic monitoring of non-violent convicted felons:An experiment in home detention. Washington, DC: U.S.Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Berman, D.A. (1994, Summer). Home detention as an alternativepunishment for criminal offenders: A research guide. lJegalreference services quarterly. 13, 45-80.
Brown, M.P. & Elrod, P. (1995, July). Electronic home arrest: Anexamination of citizen attitudes. Crime and delinquency. 41,332-346.
Chicknavorian, F.D. (1991, March). House arrest; a viablealternative to the current prison system. New EnglandJournal on Criminal and Civil Continement. 53-66.
Corbett, R. (1989, October). Electronic monitoring.f9rrections Today. 51(6), 74-80.
Del Carmen, R.V. & Vaughn, J.B. (1986, June). Legal issues inthe use of electronic surveillance in probation. FederalProbation, 50(2), 60-69.
26
Dodd, H.T. (1990). Electronic monitoring: Florida's experience.In A. Dargis (Ed.), The state_Ptcorrections: PrQceedings ofACA annual conferences. 1989 (pp. 28-32).
Duncan, L. (1995, April). Electronic bracelets flawed, suitsclaim: Chicago-area man, girl murdered by criminals whoescaped from the devices. ABA journal. 81, 30.
Electronic monitoring at the Youth Stut.-4y Center. (1991). NewOrleans, LA: Office of Criminal Justice Coordination.
Electronic monitoring in intensive probation and paroleprograms. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of JusticeAssistance. (NCCD C&JD 1713)
Esteves, A.M. (1990, Winter). Electronic incarceration inMassachusetts: A critical analysis. Social Justice. 17(4),76-105.
Fay, S.J. (1993, December). The rise and fall of tagging as acriminal justice measure in Britain. Intrnational journalof the soctology_of law. 21, 301-317.
Forgach, T.M. (1992, Spring). Cost effectiveness and use ofhouse arrest with electronic monitoring in Pima county,Arizona. Journal of Offender,lionitoring 5(2),8-10, 12, 14, 19.
Friel, C.M. & Vaughn, J.B. (1986). A consumer's guide to theelectronic monitoring of probationers. Federal Probation.50(3), 3-14.
Friel, C.M., Vaughn, J.B., & Del Carmen, R.V. (198). Electronicmonitoring and correctional policy: The technology and itsapplication. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice,National Institute of Justice. (NCCD - C&JD 1041)
Goss, M. (1990, July). Serving time behind the front door:Electronic monitoring programs provide prison alternatives.Corrections Today. 52, 80-84.
Gowen, D. (1995, March). Electronic monitoring in the southerndistrict of Mississippi. Federal probation. 59, 10-13.
Hatchett, P. (1987). The home confinement program: An appraisal,of the electronic monitoring of offenders in WashingtonCounty. Michigan. Lansing, MI: Community ProgramsEvaluation Unit, Michigan Dept. of Corrections.(NCCD C&JD 1104)
27
4,0
Hofer, P.J. & Meierhoefer, B.S. (1987). Home confinement: Anevolving sanction in the federal criminal justice system.Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
Hurwitz, J.N. (1987). House arrest: A critical analysis of anintermediate-level penal sanction. University ofPennsylvania Law Review. 135(3), 771-811.
Jolin, A. (1987). Electronic surveillance program, ClackamasCounty Community Corrections. Oregon City, OR: CCCC.(NCCD C&JD 1088)
Jolin, A. & Stipak, B. (1992, April). Drug treatment andelectronically monitored home confinflment: An evaluationof a community-based sentencing. Cxime and Delinquency,3.a(2), 158-170.
Lilly, J.R. (1992). Electronic monitoring: Another fatalremedy? In C.A. Hartjen and E.E. Rhine (Eds.), Correctionaltheory and practice (pp. 97-115). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Lilly, J.R. (1990, November). Taggingof Criminal Justice 29(4), 229-245
Lilly, J.R. (1989). What about houseGovernment, 62(2), 89-91.
reviewed. Howard Journal
arrest? Journal of State
Lilly, R.J., Ball, R.A. & Curry, G.D. (1993, October).Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver: A seven yearstudy of the home confinement alternative. Crime anddelinquency. 39, 462-84.
Lilly, J.R., Ball, R.A. & Curry, G.D. (1992, December). ThePride, Inc. Program: An evaluation of 5 years of electronicmonitoring. Federal Probation 56, 42-47.
Loveless, P. (1994, January/February). Home incarceration andelectronic-monitoring: Myths and realities. American jails.7(6), 35-36.
McIndoe, M.B. & Dihopolsky, P. (1989). suffolk CountyProbation Department electronic monitoring demonstrationgrant microform: First year evaluation (1988-89).Riverhead, NY: Suffolk County Probation Dept.(NCCD C&JD 1726)
Mainprize, S. (1992). Electronic monitoring in corrections:Assessing cost effectiveness and the potential for wideningthe net of social control. Canwlian Journal of Criminologya4.(2), 161-180.
28
29
Mair, G. & Nee, C. (1990). Electronic monitoKing: the trialsand their results. London: HMSO.
Muncie, J. (1990). A prisoner in my own home: The politics andpractice of electronic monitoring. Probation Journal.2(2), 72-77.
Neville, L. (1990). British Columbia electronic monitoringpilot project. Victoria, BC: Province o2 British Columbia,Corrections Branch.
Quinn, J.F. & Holman, J.E. (1991). Intrafamilial conflictamong felons under community supervision: An examinationof the co-habitants of electronically monitored offenders.Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 16(3 & 4), 177-192.
Potts, J. (1993, October). American penal institutions and twoalternative proposals for punishment. South Texas law review,2A, 443-519.
Rackmill, S.J. (1994, March). An analysis of home confinement asa sanction. Federal probation, 58, 45-52.
Roy, S. (1994). Electronic monitoring of juvenile offenders inLake County, Indiana: An exploratory study. Journal ofoffender monitoring. 7(1), 1-8.
Rush, G.E. (1988). Electronic surveillance: An alternative toincarceration. American Journal of Criminal Justice.12.(2), 219-242.
Russell, K. & Lilly, J.R. (Eds.). (1989). The electronicmonitoring of offenders: Symposium papers. Leicester, UK:Leicester Polytechnic.
Schmidt, A.K. (1991, June). Electronic monitors realisticallywhat can be expected? Federal Probation. 55, 47-53.
Schmidt, A.K. (1989). Electronic monitoring of offendersincreases. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, NationalInstitute of Justice.
Vaughn, J.B. (1990). Use of electronic monitoring with juvenileintensive supervision programs. In T.L. Armstrong (Ed.).,Intensive interventions with high-risk youth (pp. 189-210).Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Vaughn, J.B. (1989a). A survey of juvenile electronicmonitoring and home confinement programs. Juvenile andFamily Court Journal. 40, 1-36.
Vaughn, J.B. (Ed.). (1989). House arrest and electronicmonitoring. Journal of Criminal Justice. 5(3), 133-180.
Wade, A. (1988) . The electronic monitoring of offenders.Norwich: Social Work Monographs.
Whittington, M. (1986). Adult home detention as an alternativeto incarceration. Santa Ana, CA: Orange County ProbationDept. (NCCD C&JD 1188)
Winkler, M. (1993, July/August). Walking prisons: thedeveloping technology of electronic controls. The futurist.27, 34-6.
30
INTERNATIONAL
AfricaArab coutriesAsia & pacificAustralia
AustriaCanada
CaribbeanCosta RicaEnglandEurope
FinlandFranceGambiaGermanyGreat Britain
HungaryInternationalIsraelJapanLatin AmericaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaNorth AmericaNorwaySaudi ArabiaScotland
SwedenUnited KingdomWales
GEOGRAPHIC INDEX
Zvekic, p.9;Zvekic, p.9;Zvekic, p.9;Cain, p.3; Jackson, p.5; Junger-Tas, p.6;
McKillop, p.6; Zvekic, p.9;Junger-Tas, p.6;Doob, p.4; Junger-Tas, p.6; Landreville, p.6;
Parry, p.7; Landreville, p.10; Mainprize,p.28; Neville, p.19;
Zvekic, p.9;Zvekic, p.9;Carlen, p.3; Junger-Tas, p.6; Whitehead, p.26;Bishop, p.2; Fogel, p.4; Zvekic, p.9;
Albrecht, p.21;Junger-Tas, p.6;Junger-Tas, p.6;Zvekic, p.9;Junger-Tas, p.6; Albrecht, p.15;Pointing, p.7; Real, p.7; Stanley, p.8;
Vass, p.9; Casale, p.16; Mair, p.18;Moxon, p.18; Paying, p.18; Tackling, p.19;Mair, p.20; Hoggarth, p.22; Pease, p.23;Statistics, p.23; Young, p.23:Featherstone, p.24; Harris, p.24;Hensman, p.24; Mair, p.25; Raynor, p.25;Supervision, p.25; Vass, p.25; Fay, p.27;Mair, p.29; Nellis, p.29;
Zvekic, p.9;Research, p.8;Wozner, p.21;Community-based treatment, P.3;Zvekic, p.9;Junger-Tas, p.6; Zvekic, p.9;Junger-Tas, p.6; Zvekic, p.9; Galaway, p.17;Zvekic, p.9;Zvekic, p.9;Junger-Tas, p.6;Zvekic, p.9; ,
Junger-Tas, p.6; Duff, p.16; Knapp, p.22;McIvor, p.22; Creamer, p.24;
Bondeson, p.2; Junger-Tas, p.6;Middleton, p.7;Carlen, p.3; Nellis, p.29;
Zvekic, p.9;
31
3 2
STATE
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCalifornia
ColoradoFlorida
Georgia
IllinoisIndianaKansasLouisiana
MarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriNebraskaNew JerseyNew York
North CarolinaOhio
OklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTennesseeTexasVirginiaWisconsin
Doble, p.3, p.4; Bl!rns, p.10;Barton, p.2;Lemov, p.14; Fo.Igach, p.27;Christenberry, p.10;Davies, p.3; Bottcher, p.9; Petersilia, p.14;
Gordon, p. 17Schumacher, p.8; Mande, p.14;Bloomberg, p.2; Boot camp: a, p.9; Boot camp
evaluation, p.9; MacKenzie, p.11; Wagner,p.15; Dodd, p.27;
Fallin, p.4; MacKenzie, p.11; Erwin, p.13;Maher, p.22; Erwin, p.24;
Allen, p.15; Reed, p.19; Allen, p.21;Roy, p.29;Jones, p.5; Jones, p.6; Osborne, p.11;MacKenzie, p.10; p.11; Shaw, p.12;
Electronic, p.27;Maryland, p.11;Esteves, p.27;Barton, p.13; Hatchett, p.28;Symposium, p.19; McLagan, p.22;Porter, p.19; Gowen p.27;Baumer, p.26;Jacobs, 18;Coyle, p.3; United, p.9; Coyle, p.10;Golbin, p.5; Mathias, p.7; Onondaga, p.7; Aziz,
p.9; Fisher, p.10; MacKenzie, p.11;Observations, p.11; Second, p.12; Shock,p.12; Brown, p.15; Day, p.16; Fines, p.16;Hillsman, p. 17; McDonald, p.18;Winterfield, p.19; Whelan, p.21; McDonald,p.22; McIndoe, 28;
Donnelly, p.4;Wooldredge, p.9; Latessa, p.10; Powers, p.14;
Wiebush, p.15;Udell, p.12;Petersilia, p.14; Jolin, p.28;Weitekamp, p.19;Lindner, p. 24;Brown, p.10; MacKenzie, p.11;Record, p.8;Kinkade, p.6; Littleton, p.10; Finn, p. 16;Feasibility, p.4; Intensive, p.13;Day, p.16; Hudson, p.17; McDonald, p.18;
McEniry, p. 18; Besse, p.21.
32
NAME
Abel, C.F.Albrecht, H.Allen, G.F.Allen, H.E.Altshuler, D.M.Arad-Davidson, B.Archambeault, B.J.Archambeault, W.G.Armstrong, T.L.Aziz, D.W.
Baginsky, M.Baird, C.Ball, R.Ball, R.A.Barton, B.Barton, W.H.Baumer, T.L.Bazemore, G.Benekos, P.J.Bennett, L.Bennett, L.A.Berk, R.A.Berman, D.A.Besse, A.Bishop, N.Bloomberg, T.Bondeson, U.V.Bonta, J.Bottcher, J.Branham, L.S.Brown, M.P.Brown, S.D.Brown, S.S.Burns, J.Burns, J.C.Burton, V.S.Butts, J.A.Byrne, J.M.
Cain, M.Campbell, A.Calco, G.E.Carlen, P.Carmen, R.D.Carmen, R.V.
AUTHOR INDEX
PAGE
1515, 2115, 212322126262, 139
8
2, 1323, 26282
1326212132
21262122
21393
269
1510105
13, 162, 13
3
2133
229, 10, 21,
33
22
Carter, R.M. 3Casale, S.S. 16Champion, D.J. 19, 23Chicknavorian, E.D. 26Christianberry, N.J. 10Clarke, S.H. 4Clear, T.R. 7Cochran, D. 23Cole, G.F. 16Colson, C. 3, 16Conrad, J.P. 16Cooper, G. 21Corbett, R. 26Coyle, E.J. 3, 10Creamer, A. 24Cromwell, P. 24Cullen, F.T. 13Cunniff, M.A. 24Curry, G.D. 28
Dagger, R. 16D'Augusta, R. 3Davies, M. 3Decomo, B. 2Del Carmen, R.V. 13, 14, 26, 27Deschenes, E.P. 7, 10, 11, 15Dickinson, G.B. 10Diggs, D.W. 19Dihopolsky, P. 28Doble, J. 3, 4Dodd, H.T. 27Donnelly, L.F. 4Doob, A.N. 4Duff, R. 16Duffee, D.E. 4Dufour, H.E. 22Dunaway, R.G. 5Duncan, L. 27Durham, A.M. 4
Elis, L.A. 11Ellsworth, T. 4Erwin, B.S. 13, 24Eskridge, C.W. 24Esteves, A.M. 27
Fallin, V. 4Fay, S.J. 27Featherstone, B. 24Feeley, M.M. 21Feis, C.L. 21Fields, C.B. 4
34
4 s
Finn, P.16
Fisher, I.10Fogel, D.4
Forgach, T.M. 27Freed, D.J.
4Friday, P.C.
20Friel, C.M. 27Fromson, K.B.
4Fulton, B.
13
Galaway, B.Geerken, M.R.Gendreau, P.Glaser, D.Golbin, J.J.Gordon, M.A.Goss, M.Gould, L.A.Gowan, M.Green, G.Greene, J.Griffiths, C.T.
Hadley, J.B.Hanson-Stone, J.A.Harris, M.K.Harris, R.Hartman, D.J.Hartman, J.Hatchett, P.Hayes, H.D.Hedderman, C.Hensman, M.J.Hicks, N.Hillsman, S.T.Hofer, P.J.Hoggarth, E.A.Holman, J.E.Hudson, J.Huff, C.R.Humphrey, C.Hurwitz, J.N.Hynes, C.J.
Ingram, G.L.
Jackson, H.Jacobs, S.Jefferson, J.Jenkins, D.A.Jennings, M.Johnson, C.
5,44,
3,5172711,2781822
1022524209274182420172822295,2124285
5
5
18
6
1420
16,
1317
21
17,
17,
18,
19,
22,
22,
23
23
35
Jolin, A.Jones, P.R.Junger-Tas, J.
286
6
Keenan, J.P. 10Keller, O.J. 20Kempf, K. 8Kerper, H. 19Killinger, G. 19Killinger, P.P. 6Kinkade, P.T. 6Klein, A.R. 24Klein, J. 4Knapp, M. 22Korotkin, P.H. 7Krause, W. 6Krisberg, B. 6
Landreville, P.Langan, P.A.Latessa, E.J.Lauen, R.J.
6,
69,
6
10
10, 20, 24
Lawrence, R. 14, 18Lemov, P. 14Lerner, S. 6Lilly, J.R. 28Lindner, C. 24, 25, 29Lipchitz, J.W. 14Littleton, R.M. 10Lloyd, C. 18Loveless, P. 28Luchen, K. 2Lurigio, A.J. 3, 9
McCarthy, B.J. 6McCarthy, B.R. 6, 14McCarthy, R.J. 20McDonald, D. 18, 22McDonald, D.C. 18McDonald, D.G. 7McEniry, M.C. 18McGarrell, E.F. 4McIndoe, M.B. 28McIvor, G. 14, 22MacKenzie, D.L. 10, 11, 12McKillop, S. 6McKinnon, J.D. 6McLagan, J. 22McShane, M.D. 6Maher, R.J. 22
36
3"i
Mahoney, BMainprize, S.Mair, G.Mande, M.Marsh, F.H.Mathias, R.A.Meechan, K.Meierhoefer, B.S.Mendelson, R.I.Middleton, K.Minor, K.I.Moore, D.C.Moran, T.K.Morash, N.Morris, N.Morton, F.P.Moxon, D.Mullaney, F.G.Muncie, J.
Nee, C.Neville, L.Nidorf, B.J.Nix, C.A.Novack, S.Nutter, R.W.
O'Leary, P.O'Leary, V.Osborne, W.N.Osler, M.W.
Paparozzi, M.A.Parent, D.G.Parry, G.Partridge, A.Patenaude, A.L.Pease, K.Petersen, W.C.Petersilia, J.Piquero, A.Pointing, J.Polinsky, A.M.Polk, O.E.Porter, W.H.Potts, J.Powers, K.
Quinn, J.F.
Rackmill, S.J.Raleigh, W.
42818,14117
1622217
201825117
8181829
20,297111723
771111
511,7182223,203,117
1814192914
29
297
20, 25,
29
20, 25
24
7, 14,
29
15, 20, 23,
37
25
Raynor, P. 25Reed, D.E. 19Riechers, L.M. 11Robertson, E. 22Rosenfield, R. 8Roy, S. 29Ruback, R.B. 10Rubin, H.T. 23Rucker, L. 11Rumgay, J. 25Rush, G.E. 29Russell, K. 29
Salerno, A.W.Sandhu, R.K.Schadler, W.Schmidt, A.K.Schumacher, M.Sechrest, D.K.Senese, J.D.Shavell, S.Shaw, J.W.
111,
1624,812151811,
25
29
12Shilton, M.K. 8, 19Simpson, S.S. 11Skinns, C.D. 23Sluder, R.D. 25Smykla, J.O. 8, 25Stanley, S. 8Stewart, J.K. 25Stipak, B. 28Stone, S. 13Strandberg, K.W. 12Sutton, M. 18
Tomkins, D.L. 25Tonry, M. 7Tonry, R. 15Trager, H. 16Travis, L.F. 9, 24Travis, L.P. 20Trotto, S.D. 5Turner, L.C. 15Turner, S. 7, 11, 14,Turver, N. 26
Udell, D.S. 12
Van den Haag, E. 8Van Ness, D.W. 3Vass, A.A. 9, 25Vaughn, J.B. 27, 29, 30Vito, G.F. 10, 12, 18
38
3;J
15
Von Hirsch, A. 9
Wade, A. 30Wagner, D. 2, 15Wagner, R. 24Walker, C. 19Walker, J. 7Warner, J.R. 20Weitekamp, E.G. 19Weston, A, 20Wheatley, J. 26Whelan, C.S. 21White, A.G. 19Whitehead, J.T. 25Whitehead, P. 25, 26Whittington, M. 30Wiebush, R.D. 15Wilkins, L.T. 3Willison, V.A. 11Winkler, M. 30Winterfield, L.A. 19Wooldredge, J. 9Worzella, C. 18Wozner, Y. 21Wright, M. 19
Young, M.E. 21Young, W. 23
39
4 0