DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 363 828 CG 026 011

AUTHOR Sampson, James P., Jr.; Norris, Debra S.TITLE The Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and

Staffing of Career Information Delivery Systems inthe United States: Technical Report No. 16.

INSTITUTION Florida State Univ., Tallahassee. Center for theStudy of Technology in Counseling and CareerDevelopment.

SPONS AGENCY National Occupational Information CoordinatingCommittee (DOL/ETA), Washington, DC.

PUB DATE Mar 93NOTE 81p.; For related documents, see CG 026 002-010.PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Career Counseling; *Career Development; *Career

Guidance; *Computer Uses in Education; *DeliverySystems; Financial Support; *InformationDissemination; *Organizational Climate

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to collect, analyze,

and disseminate baseline data to aid computer-based careerinformation delivery system (CIDS) operators and state and federalpolicy makers in making more informed decisions about the financing,organizational structure, and staffing of CIDS.-CIDS arecomputer-based resources that provide information on occupations andrelated education and training opportunities. The study populationwas defined as the 45 state occupational information coordinatingcommittee (SOICC)-recognized CIDS, plus CIDS operating in California,Connecticut, and New York. Since Missouri has two separateSOICC-recognized CIDS, the total possible number of CIDS was 49.Forty-seven CIDS returned the CIDS Information Collection Form,yielding a final response rate of 96%. The results revealed that userfees provided between 47 and 51% of CIDS funding. The greatest changein funding involved the increase in user fees. In terms oforganizational structure, a diversity of agencies and organizationsserved on many CIDS governing and advisory boards. In terms of staffresponsibilities, it appears that less time is allocated to trainingin comparison with other staff duties. Seventeen data tables andother relevant forms are appended. (NB)

***********************************************************************

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

***********************************************************************

The Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing

of Career Information Delivery Systems in the United States:

Technical Report No. 16

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOn.ce of Educationar Research and ImprovementEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION

CENTER (ERICI. Tnis document has been reproduced asreceived from the !person or oroanrzat.on

originating it;- Minor changes have been made to improve

reproduction Qualify

Pomts of vie e. or opinions stated m thisdocu-rnent do not necessarily represent officialOERI position or pohcy

by

James P. Sampson, Jr.Debra S. Norris

March 1993'PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)."

Center for the Study of Technology in Counseling and Career Development

Department of Human Services and Studies215 Stone Building

The Florida State UniversityTallahassee, Florida 32306-3001

James P. Sampson, Jr. is Professor and Co-Director of the Center for the Study ofTechnology in Counseling and Career Development and Debra S. Norris is a graduate student in theDepartment of Human Services and Studies at Florida State University. Appreciation is expressedto Eleanor Dietrich, Valorie Hopkins, Carol Kososki, Roger Lambert, Chuck Mollerup, and Harvey011is for their review of an initial draft of the survey instrument, to Bob Loft for final preparation ofthe survey and collecting the data, and to Eleanor Dietrich, Janet Lenz, Harvey 011is, RobertReardon, and Sandra Sampson for their review of an initial draft of this report. Funding for thisresearch was provided by the National Occt.;:Aonal Information Coordinating Committee.

2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Table of Contents

Abstract 1

Statement of the Problem 3

Purpose of the Study 3

MethodPopulation 4instrumentation 4Procedures 5

ResultsFinancial Status 5Organizational Structure 6Responsibilities of ClDS Staff 7Sopplemental Data 7

Discussion 7

References 9

Tables and Figures 1 0

Aendix 53

3

List of Tables

PaceTable 1 Addresses of Individuals Who Completed the C1DS Form 11Table 2 Funding Sources, 1990-1993 14Table 3 Changes in Funding - Decreasing, Increasing, & Stable, 1991-1993 19Table 4 Additional Funding Breakdowns Relative to Total Funding 24Table 5 Total Funding, 1990-1993, as Compared with Estimated Need 25Table 6 Perceptions of the Reasons for Increase Occurring from 1990-1991 to 1991-1992 27Table 7 Perceptions of the Reasons for Decreases in Funding from 1990-1991 to 1991-1992 30Table 8 What Impact did the Decreases (1990-1991 to 1991-1992) have on the

C1DS operation? 31Table 9 Types of Assistance CIDS Need in Order to Cope with Financial Problems 33Table 10 Security of Funding for C1DS 36Table 11 Enabling Legislation 39Table 12 CIDS Organizational Structure (Administrative Agent for State CDS) 42Table 13 Governing Board Chairs 44Table 14 Advisory Board Chairs 45Table 15 CIDS Organizational Structure (Organizations Represented on Governingand Advisory Boards) 46Table 16 Percentage of Staff Responsibilities 48Table 17 Additional Comments 51

List of Figures

EasigFigure 1 Changes in Source Funding (Funds), 1991-1993 17Figure 2 Changes in Source Funding (States Reporting), 1991-1993 18Figure 3 Changes in Source Funding (Stability), 1991-1993 20Figure 4 Changes in Source Funding - Decreasing, 1991-1993 21Figure 5 Changes in Source Funding - Increasing, 1991-1993 22Figure 6 Changes in Source Funding - Stable, 1991-1993 23Figure 7 Total Funding 26Figure 8 Perceived Security of Funding for CIDS Operation During the Coming Two Years 41Figure 9 Total Administrative Agents for CIDS 43Figure 10 State CIDS Governing and Advisory Board 47Figure 11 Percentage of Staff Responsibilities 49Figure 12 Type of C1DS 50

4

1

The Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of Career Information Delivery Systemsin the United States: Technical Report No. 16

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to collect, analyze, and disseminate baseline data to aidcomputer-based career information delivery system (CIDS) operators and state and federal policymakers in making more informed decisions about the financing, organizational structure, andstaffing of CIDS. Lester and 011is (1988) defined CIDS as "computer-based resources that provideinformation on occupations and related education and training opportunities" (p. 205). A total of 47out of the 49 eligible C1DS returned the CIDS Information Collection Form, yielding a final responserate of 9E5%. Results are presented in 17 tables and 11 figures. The results are then discussed,including specific attention to implications for the future.

5

2

The Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of Career Information Delivery Systemsin the United States: Technical Report No. 16

Career Information Delivery Systems (CIDS) have evolved from a new technologicalinnovation in the 1970's to a key element in the delivery oi career information in the United Statesin the 1990's. McCormac (1988) noted that CIDS, "were developed to fulfill the needs studentsand adults have for increased and improved career guidance services" (p. 196). Lester and 01 lis(1988) defined CIDS as "computer-based resources that provide information on occupations andrelated education and training opportunities" (p. 205). Hopkins, Kinnison, Morgenthau, and 01 lis(1992) stated that CIDS

provide useful information for people who are exploring, planning, or making decisions aboutcareers. CIDS contain national, state, and local information about occupations, educationaland training institutions and programs, and related subjects. . . . Most of these systems arecomputer-based, but other media are also used to provide information. Tabloid newspapersand telephone hotlines, for expmple, can reach people in areas without access tocomputerized systems (p. 1). I

During 1990-91, over 6.9 million individuals used CIDS at over 18,282 sites in the United States,excluding telephone hotline contacts or the use of print or audio-visual media (ACSCI, 1992).

The evolution of CIDS has been recorded in the Annual Directory of the Association ofComputer-Based Systems of Career Information (ACSCI). Data on 50 CIDS (ACSCI, 1992) areprovided in the following categories:

CIDS name, address, and telephoneNames of staff membersNumber of FTE staffReporting periodAdministrative AgencyGoverning board chairAdvisory group chairDelivery systemDelivery mediumUser site categories (including number of sites and number of users)Other information products and servicesDevelopmental projectsFunding percentages

Using ACSC1 directory information as a foundation, Hopkins et al. (1992) integrated supplementaryACSCI survey data into a goneral status report on the nature and use of CIDS in the United States.The report included the following topics related to CIDS:

Overall functioningGeneral use of CIDSUser sitesUsersAccess (direct search, structured search, standardized tests)Databases (educational and occupational information)Delivery mediaTraining and support materials

1 Unless otherwise noted, within this study CIDS refer to comouter-based career informationdelivery systems.

6

3

Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of CMS

Standards and guidelines

Statement of the Problem

As the labor market in the United States becomes less stable, adolescents and adults aremaking increased demands on Career Information Delivery Systems (C1DS) to provide informationnecessary to make career and employment decisions. However, during this time of increaseddemand for CIDS services, public sector funding for CIDS appears to be less stable. As a result, itis important to ensure that the financing, organizational structure, and staffing of C1DS areappropriate given the increasing demand for services.

C1DS operators, faced with impending change in funding sources and amounts, need ananalysis of baseline data that describes the current financial status of CIDS in the United States.CIDS operators also need data on administrative agents, governing boards, and advisory boards inorder to evaluate options for creating organizational structures that are cost-efficient, yet alloweffective input among stakeholders in order to maximize funding opportunities. Finally, CIDSoperators need data on staffing patterns, since personnel costs are a major element in C1DSbudgets. This analysis and baseline data will allow C1DS operators to make comparisons amongCIDS For example, a CIDS operator could evaluate funding, organization, and staffing within theirstate in comparison with all CIDS in general or CIDS with similar characteristics. While the ACSCIAnnual Directory data (ACSCI, 1992) and the CIDS Status Report (Hopkins, et al., 1992) providevaluable information, these data sources were not designed to provide specific details on thefinancing, organizational structure, and staffing of CIDS.

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this study was to collect, analyze, and disseminate baseline data to aid CIDSoperators and state and federal policy makers in making more informed decisions about thefinancing, organizational structure, and staffing of CIDS. The following specific questions wereaddressed:

1) What are the current C1DS funding sources and levels for 1990-1991, 1991-1992, and 1992-1993?

2) What changes have occurred in funding between 1990-1991 and 1992-1993?

3) What are the funding levels for CIDS research and development and CDS evaluation relative tototal CIDS funding?

4) What are CIDS operators' perceptions of the estimated need for C1DS funding relative to CIDSfunding for 1990-1991, 1991-1992, and 1992-1993?

5) What are CIDS operators' perceptions of the reasons for increases and decreases in CIDSfunding?

6) What are CIDS operators' perceptions of the impact of decreases in C:DS funding on C1DSoperation?

7) What are CIDS operators' perceptions of the type of assistance needed in order for C1DS to copewith financial problems?

8) What are CIDS operators' perceptions of the relative security of CIDS funding?

7

4

Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of CIDS

9) What is the enabling legislation that provides the legal mandate for the financing and operation ofCIDS?

10) What administrative agents exist for CIDS?

11) What are the prevalence and nature of governing boards and advisory boards for C1DS?

12) What are the percentages of CIDS staff responsibilities allocated to management, clericalsupport, user services and marketing, training, information development, softwaredevelopment, and other?

13) What type of C1DS (sytems obtained, purchased, or leased from some other entity vs. systemsdeveloped within a state or municipality) are currently in use?

Method

PopulationThis analysis of financial status, organizational structure, and staffing was designed to

include the total population of CIDS operating in the United States as of June 1992. A total of 46states and territories were operating CIDS recognized by the appropriate state occupationalinformation coordinating committee (SOICC) in 1992 (NOICC, 1992).

California, Connecticut and New York have several large computerized CIDS, both publicand private, in operation, but the SOICC has not designated any as the official statewideC1DS. Seven states/territories did not have a computer-based state-wide system inoperation as of June 1992, including Guam, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, NorthernMariana Islands, Texas, West Virginia and the Virgin Islands (NOICC, 1992, p. 22).

For the purposes of this investigation, the population was defined as the 45 SOICC-recognizedCIDS, plus CIDS operating in California, Connecticut, and New York. Since Missouri has twoseparate SOICC-recognized CIDS (CHOICES and VIEW), the total possible number of CIDS was 49.California data was from the EUREKA system. New York data was from the New York CityMetro Guide system. A total of 48 out of the eligible 49 CIDS responded to the survey described inthe following section, resulting in a response rate of 98%. One state was subsequently removedfrom the study. The CIDS in the state of Michigan has recently experienced substantial change infinancing and organization. Given the previous budget and staffing of this CIDS, data fromMichigan was omitted from the analyses in order to avoid inappropriately skewing the results." Asa result, a total of 47 out of the 49 eligible CIDS were included, yielding a final response rate of96%. Since individuals completing the survey did not always respond to all of the items, theresponse rate for any given question was often less than 96%. Given the exploratory nature of thisstudy, response rates were judged adequate to provide valid and generalizable data.

InstrumentationGiven the unique nature of the questions being askez; in this investigation, a survey was

judged as the best approach for obtaining data. After basic research questions were identified, adraft of the survey was developed by the authors of this study. A panei of reviewers representingCIDS operators, the National Occupational Information Coordinating Committee (NOICC), SOICC's,and ACSCI, then reviewed and suggested revisions for the survey in order to ensure that theresearch questions were appropriately addressed. The revised survey was then approved by theContract Officer at NOICC for dissemination. In order to minimize the number of requests for

2 Future analyses of the financial status, organizational structure, and staffing of CIDS need toinclude Michigan as soon as the situation stabilizes.

5Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of CIDS

information required of CIDS operators, the survey for this investigation was integrated as Part 11(pages 6 through 12) of the annual ACSCI survey entitled, "C1DS Information Collection Form." Acopy of the CIDS Information Collection Form may be found in the Appendix.

ProceduresA letter soliciting participation in the study from the ACSCI Clearinghouse Coordinator and

the CIDS Information Collection Form was mailed to the 49 eligible C1DS. An information copy ofthe form was also sent to SOICC directors to keep them informed regarding CIDS research. After aperiod of six weeks, the NOICC Contract Officer and the ACSC1 Clearinghouse Coordinatorcontacted CIDS by phone and requested completion of the form. All remaining outstanding surveyswere received by February 1993. A copy of the letter soliciting participation in the study may befound in the Appendix.

Results

The results of this study are organized in terms of the financial status, organizationalstructure, staffing of C1DS, and supplemental data. The order of the Tables and Figures followssequentially from Part II of the C1DS Information Collection Form. Numbers of states reporting,indicated at the end of most Tables and all Figures, vary according to information received for eachsection. Table 1 consists of the names, addresses and phone numbers of the individuals whocompleted the CIDS survey form.

Financial StatusWhat are the current CIDS fundina sources and levels for 1990-1991. 1991-1992, and

1992-1993? Table 2 delineates funds provided by specific sources for each state for 1990-1991,1991-1992, and 1992-1993. User fees consistently provide the largest proportion of CIDS funding(47% to 51%). The number of states reporting varies slightly per year as a result of incompletedata.

What chances have occurred in fundina between 1990-1991 and 1992-1993? Figure 1illustrates the total changes in source funding in dollar amounts for the three year period. Thenumber of states represented is smaller than those in Table 2 because three states did not providethe data necessary to show the breakdown by funding sources per year. Only states that providedall information for each year were able to be included. The greatest increases occur each year inUser Fees and State Legislative Appropriation and State Department of Labor/JTPA/EmploymentSecurity. Mild increases are shown in NOICC Basic Assistance Grants and State LegislativeAppropriations. A decrease occurred in the amount of funding provided through the StateDepartments of Education/Offices of Vocational Education, while Other Funding Sources vacillatearound a million dollars, appearing to increase slightly in 1992-1993.

Figure 2 reports the same results as Figure 1, except with a focus on the number of statesrather than on dollar amounts. The greatest inaveases were consistent with those noted in Figure 1.NOICC Basic Assistance Grants show stable representation over the three year period, while StateLegislative Appropriations and Other Funding Sources indicate an increase after the first year,followed by stability in the following two years. State Departments of Education/Offices ofVocational Education show a decrease after the first year, followed by a slight increase for 1992-1993.

Table 3 and Figure 3 describe the number of states represented in each area of fundingchanges, either decreasing, increasing or stable between 1990-1991 and 1992-1993. Theclassification of states into the various categories was determined by a calculation of 10 percent. Ifthe funding had changed by a 10 percent margin in either direction, it would be classified as eitherdecreasing or increasing. The number of states reporting dollar amounts differs from the number ofstates categorized as decreasing, increasing or stable, resulting from the way information was

9

6

Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of CIDS

reported in the survey. For example, one state reported total amounts only. While it was notpossible to incorporate this data into the table, a calculation was possible to incorporate the datainto the specific category of decroasing, increasing or stable funding.

Figure 3 indicates the largest category of states being classified as having "stable" funding.Figures 4, 5 and 6 show the specific breakdowns in source funding for the categories of decreasing,increasing and stable. Figure 4 illustrates that the largest decrease (for states with decreasingfunding) of funds was experienced in user fees, dropping from about $400,000 to $150,000 from1991-1993. Figures 5 and 6 identify the increase of User Fees to be associated with statesclassified as either having increasing or stable funding from 1991-1993.

What are the funding levels for CIDS research and development and C1DS evaluation relativeto total CIDS fundina? Table 4 describes funding for research and development and funding forevaluating C1DS' effectiveness as compared with the total funding for each state during 1991-1992.Results indicate that 7 percent of total funding was allotted for research and development, while 1percent was allotted for evaluating CIDS' effectiveness.

What are CIDS operators' _perceptions of the estimated need for CIDS funding relative toCIDS fundina for 1990-1991. 1991-1992, and 1992-1993? Table 5 and Figure 7 show that totalfunding for states has increased slightly over a three year period and that estimated futuce fundingneeds exceed actual funding for 1992-1993.

What are CIDS operators' perceptions af the reasons for increases and decreases in CIDSfunding? Table 6 outlines statements given by C1DS operators as to their perceptions of whyincreases in funding occurred from 1990-91 to 1991-92. The majority of the reasons related tochanges in federal funding and in user bases. Table 7 describes CIDS operators' perceptions ofwhy decreases in funding occurred from 1990-91 to 1991-92. The most often stated reason was areduction in monies available by Carl Perkins legislation.

What are CIDS operators' perceptions of the impact of decreases in CIDS fundino on CIDSoperation? Table 8 indicates the perceived impact of decreases in funding on CIDS' operation, withthe greatest impact being in the areas of staffing and services provided.

What are CIDS operators' perceptions of the tvoe of assistance needed in order for CIDS tocope with financial problems? Table 9 identifies the type of assistance CIDS operators feel isnecessary to help CIDS cope with financial problems. The most commonly cited assistance was theneed for additional funding.

What are CIDS operators' perceptions of the relative security of C1DS funding? Table 10and Figure 8 show the relative security of in-state funding for CIDS' operation during the next twoyears. The number of states responding to each source is indicated by source in Table 10. Withthe exception of User Fees (increase expected), most states indicate an expectation for continuedfunding at the present level for all funding sources during the next two years.

What is the enabling legislation that provides the legal mandate for the financing andooeration of CIDS? Table 11 indicates state and federal enabling legislation. The Carl Perkins Actand the Job Training Partnership Act were the most common enabling legislation at the federallevel.

Oraanizatkinal StructureWhat administrative aaents exist for CIDS? Table 12 and Figur4 9 indicate specific

administrative agents for state CIDS, with SOICC's as the largest representative among states.

1 0

7Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of CIDS

What are the prevalence and nature of governing boards and advisory boards for CIDS?Tables 13 and 14 provide a list of governing and advisory board chairs, respectively. Table 15 andFigure 10 portray organizations represented on both governing and advisory boards, with an "A"standing for Advisory Board and a "G" for Governing Board. SOICC and State Departments ofEducation or Offices of Vocational Education are the largest representatives on Governing Boards,while State Departments of Education or Offices of Vocational Education, State Colleges orUniversities, JTPA and CIDS Users constitute the largest representatives on Advisory Boards.Figure 10 identifies State Department of Labor/Economic or Employment Security as being thelargest representative for combined Governing and Advisory Boards, although many otherorganizations were often also represented.

Responsibilities of CIDS StaffWhat are the percentages of CIDS staff responsibilities allocated to management, clerical

support user services and marketing, training, information development, software development, andother? Table 16 and Figure 11 delineate percentages of total staff responsibilities per state, ascalculated in relation to total FTE's. The largest percentage of staff responsibilities is evenlydistributed (20% each) among management, user services/marketing and information development,with clerical support also being a common responsibility (18%).

Supplemental DataWhat type of C1DS (systems obtained, purchased, or leased from some other entity vs.

systems developed within a state or municipality) are currently in use? Figure 12 indicates thatmost of the states reporting have a CIDS system that was obtiained, purchased or leased with CIDSstaff primarily responsible for user services and development.'" Table 17 is a compilation of states'additional comments. Statements are represented in verbatim fashion.

Discussion

Data from this study indicate that user fees are the key variable in the financing of CIDS.Almost half of all CIDS funding is derived from user fees (Tables 1, 2, and 3). The greatest changein funding involves the increase in user fees (Figure 1). In states experiencing either decreasingfunding (Figure 4) or increasing funding (Figure 5), user fees are the dominant factor. Many C1DSoperators perceived that user fees would increase, or a least remain stable (Figure 8). The need foradditional CIDS funding (Table 5 and Figure 7), coupled with the public funding decreases that haveoccurred in some states (Table 7), will likely result in increased pressure on user fees to supplynen,3sary financial resources.

Increasing reliance on user fees in the financing of CIDS may or may not be in the bestinterests of the public. Determining the appropriateness of this increasing reliance on user fees,requires evaluating whether or not the accessibility to C1DS by the public has been compromised. Ifthe increase in user fees results from increases in the number of individuals and organizations usingCIDS, then public interest is likely served. lf, however, user fees are increased to provide necessaryfinancing, then CIDS use may decrease during times of limited public funding because the resourceis more expensive. This impact may be disproportionately felt among individuals with limitedincomes. Reducing access to occupational and educational information would not seem to be in thebest interest of the nation. Future data collection, analysis, and discussion among CIDS operatorsand policy makers will be needed to determine the appropriateness of increasing reliance on userfees.

Adequate funding for research, development, and evaluation, is necessary to ensure thatvalid information is effectively delivered to individuals involved in making career and educational

3 It is recognized that not all CIDS are computer-based and that other types of delivery media, suchas tabloid newspapers and telephone hotlines, are also used.

1 1

8

Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of C1DS

decisions. Enhanced research, development, and evaluation was identified by participants at arecent international teleconference as a key element in improving the design and use of computer-assisted career guidance systems (Sampson, Reardon, & Lenz, 1991). Allocating seven percent offunding for research and development and one j)ercent of funding for evaluation (Table 4) may notbe adequate in view of the needs that exist. Although specific funding percentages are likely tovary from state to state, some general exploration is needed to determine the average fundingnecessary to carry out appropriate research, development, and evaluation.

In terms of organizational structure, a diversity of agencies and organizations serve on manyCIDS governing and advisory boards (Table 15 and Figure 10). A potential problem may exist,however, in that eight states reported the absence of both a governing and an advisory board.Given the increasing competition among public agencies for limited public funds, it would appearthat having a minimum of an advisory board would enhance opportunities for communicating theimportance of providing quality occupational and educational information.

In terms of staff responsibilities, it appears that less time is allocated to trainina incomparison with other staff duties (Table 6 and Figure 11). One CIDS operator commented thatCIDS that fail seem to do a poor job of training, technical assistance, and customer service (Table9). The i:nernational teleconference noted above, identified training as the most important issue inimproving the use of computer-assisted career guidance systems (Sampson, Reardon, & Lenz,1991). CIDS operators and policy makers need to reexamine the allocation of staff responsibilitiesto ensure that an appropriate balance of tasks is maintained.

The results of this study provide baseline data concerning the financing, organizationalstructure, and staffing of CIDS. These data can be useful to CIDS operators and state and federalpolicy makers in two ways. First, CIDS operators and policy makers can use these data to furtherexplore current financing, organizational structure, and staffing issues, some of which are describedabove. Second, by collecting these types of data at periodic intervals, it will be possible to evaluatechanges that occur in the financing, organizational structure, and staffing of CIDS. By making moreinformed decisions, C1DS operators and policy makers help to ensure the effective provision ofoccupational and educational information to the public.

12

9Financial Status, Organizational Structure, and Staffing of CIDS

References

Association of Computer-Based Systems for Career Information: (1991). 1992 Directory of State-BasedCareer Information Delivery Systems. Eugene, OR: ACSCI Clearinghouse, Center for AdvancedTechnology in Education, University of Oregon.

Hopkins, V., Kinnison, J., Morgenthau, E., & 011is, H. (1992). Career information delivery systems:A summary status report (NOICC Occasional paper No. 4). Washington, D.C.: NationalOccupational Information Coordinating Committee.

Lester, J. N., & 011is, H. T. (1988). Future challenges to career information providers: A NOICCperspective. Journal of Career Development, 14, 205-215.

McCormac, M. E. (1988). The use of career information delivery systems in the United States.Journal of Career Development,14., 196-204.

National Occupational Information Coordinating Committee. (1992). Status of the NOICC/SOICCnetwork (Administrative Report No. 18). Washington, D.C.: Author.

Sampson, J. P., Jr., Reardon, R. C., & Lenz, J. G. (1991). Computer-assisted career guidancesystems: Improving the design and use of systems. Journal of Career Development, 17, 185-194.

13

TABLE 1

ADDRESSES OF INDIVIDUALS WHOCOMPLETED THE CIDS FORM

Janet SmithAlaska Career Information System801 West 10th Street, Suite 200Juneau, AK 99801-1894(907) 465-4685

Mary Louise SimmsAlabama(205) 242-2990

Tom OwensArkansas Employment Security Dept.SOICC SectionPO BOX 2951Little Rock, AR 22203(501) 682-3117

Hugo H. SoilASOICC/DBS1789 W. Jefferson Site 897JPhoenix, AZ 85007(602) 542-3871

Jerry LaureynsRegional DirectorNorth California(510) 235-3883

Colorado Career Information System3800 York St. - Unit BDenver, CO 80205(303) 764-3936

Yvonne HowellDCOICC Corrdinator500 C St., NWRoom 215Washington, DC 20001

Bruce Dacey2575 Summit Bridge Rd.Newark, DE 19702

Zelda RogersBureau of Career Development & Ede':ationalImprovementFlorida Education CenterTallahassee, FL 32399

Les JanisGeorgia Career Information SystemGeorgia State UniversityBox 1028, University PlazaAtlanta, GA 30303(404) 651-3100

14

Lincoln T. Higa615 Piikoi Street, Ste.100Honolulu, HI 96814(808) 586-8625

Penelope ShenkActing Executive DirectorIOWA SOICC200 East Grand AvenueDes Moines, IA 50309-1819(515) 242-4890

Chuck MollerupRoom 301, Len B. Jordan Building650 West State StreetBoise, ID 83720(208) 334-3705

Jan Staggs, Executive DirectorIllinois Occupational InformationCoordinating Committee

217 East Monroe Street, Ste 203Springfield, IL 62706(217) 785-0789

Linda S. Piper309 W. Washington St., Ste. 309Indianapolis, IN 46204(317) 233-3785

D. AngleKansas Careers2323 Anderson Avenue, Suite 248Manhattan, KS 66502-2912(913) 532-6540

Don C. SullivanKOICC275 East Main Street - 1 EastFrankfort, KY 40621-0001(502) 564-4258

Priscilla EngoliaP.O. Box 94094Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9094(504) 342-5151

Jasmin Duckett, MOICC Director1100 North Eutaw Street, Room 205Baltimore, MD 21201(410) 333-5478

11

Table 1, cont.

Denis FortierMOICCState House Station #71Augusta, ME 04333(207) 289-2331FAX: (207) 289-2334

William WeisgerberMichigan Department of EducationPO BOX 30009Lansing, MI 48909(517) 373-3373

Kay RaithelMissouri Choices

James H. Grogan, Ph.D.Missouri View Program15875 New Halls Ferry RoadFlorissant, MO 63031

Terry Hamm932 Capitol Square Building550 Cedar StreetSt. Paul, MN 55101(612) 296-1432

Liz Barnett301 West Pearl StreetJackson, MS 39203-3089(601) 949-2240 or 949-2002

Anne Wolfinger, DirectorMontana Career Information SystemMontana Higher Education Systems250 BroadwayHelena, MT 59620-3101(406) 444-0303

Nancy H. MacCormacPO BOX 27625Raleigh, -1C 27611(919) 733-6700

Dan MarrsBox 1537Bismark, ND 58502-1537(701) 224-2733

Fay G. Larson421 Nebraska HallUniversity of NebraskaBox 880552Lincoln NE 68588-0552(402) 472-2570

15

Laurence H. Seidel, DirectorNJOICCCN 056Trenton, NJ 08625(609) 292 2682

Charles LehmanNM- SOICCBox 1928Alberquerque, NM 87103(505) 841-8455

Valerie Hopkins1923 N. Carson Street, ft211Carson City, NV 89710(702) 687-4577

Marilyn ShipmanOhio Career Information System(614) 644-6771

Kelly BattlesODVTE1500 W. 7thStillwater, OK 74074(405) 743-5159

Cheryl BuhlOregon Career Information SystemUniversity of OregonEugene, OR 97403-1244(503) 346-3872

Michael J. NeillCareer Information System1177 Pearl Street, Suite 200Eugene, OR 97401(503) 346-3872 x. 4555

Robert WilliamsMarketing & Technical Assistance ManagerPennsylvania SOICC1224 Labor & Industry BuildingHamsburg, PA 17120

Josus Santiago RiosPO BOX 366212San Juan, PR00936-366212(809) 723-7110

Mildred T. NicholsRhode Island Occupational InformationCoordinating Committee

22 Hayes StreetProvidence, RI 02908-5025

12

Table 1, cont.

Angeleen HunterCOICCPO BOX 995Columbia, SC 29202(803) 737-2733

Melodee LaneLabor Market Information CenterSouth Dakota Department of LaborPO BOX 4730Aberdeen, SD 57402-4730(605) 622-2314

Dr. Walter A. Cameron, DirectorTAE Dept. University of Tennessee438 Claxton AdditionKnoxville, TN 37996-3400(615) 974-2574

Tammy Stewart140 E. 300 GP.O. BOX 11249Salt Lake City, UT 84147(801) 536-7861

Gale A. Watts, Project ManagerVirginia VIEWVirginia Tech205 W. Roanoke StreetBlacksburg, VA 24601-0527(703) 231-7571

Tom Douse, VOICC Directorc/o

Vermont Dept. of Employment and TrainingPO BOX 190Montpelier, VT 05601-0488(802) 828-4100

Marie Selstad & Tami Palmer1415 Harrison NW #201Olympia, WA 98502(206) 754-8222

Wisconsin Career Information SystemCenter on Education and Work1025 West Johnson Street, Room 964Madison, WI 53706(608) 263-2725

Rob BennettBox 3808University StationLaramie, WY 82071(307) 766-3531

1 6

13

TABLE 2Funding Sources, 1990-1991

14

UserFees

NOICCBasic

AssistanceGrant

StateLegislative

Appropriation

StateD.O.E. orOffice ofVocationalEducation

StateDepartment of

Labor/JTPAEmployment

Security

OtherFundingSources

TotalFunding

AK 222,123 15,000 21,788 258,911AL 120,000 200,000 320,000AR 115,824 115,324AZ 40,000 50,000 15,000 105,000CACOCTDC 14,661 14,661DEFL 330,647 162,979 666,700 1,160,326GA 246,320 185,000 431,320Hi 101,554 624,357 725,911IA 84,000 15,000 8,000 107,000ID 150,000 108,519 69,193 327,712IL 57,000 83,024 37,500 70,000 80,000 75,000 402,524IN 30,000 50,000 30,000 110,000KSKY 36,570 36,570LAMD 7,000 15,083 92,000 114,083ME 5,00G 170,000 175,000MN 269,785 4,900 274,685

MO-C 10,500 10,500MO-V 148,803 148,803

MSMTNC 30,000 13,000 43,000ND 14,800 2,300 17,100NE 95,000 14,636 103,000 212,636NJ 230,000 10,000 60,000 300,000

NM 75,000 75,000NV 118,000 76,388 22,434 216,822NYOHOK 49,858 49,858OR 521,880 5,000 6,120 533,000PAPR 22,856 22,856RI 66,000 66,000SC 252,404 128,137 237,410 617,951SD 70,851 70,851TN 120,000 120,000UT 70,000 70,000VAVT 15,000 15,000WA 292,487 . 2,500 294,987WI 704,961 704,961WY 20,000 25,000 45,000

TOTAL 3,883,868 870,542 1,203,125 1,124,216 262,193 969,908 8,313,852% of TOTAL 47 % 10% 14% 14% 3 % 12% 100%# of states 22 20 6 13 6 7

1 '7

TABLE 2, cont.Funding Sources, 1991-1992

15

UserFees

NOICCBasic

AssistanceGrant

StateLegislative

Appropriation

StateD.O.E. orOffice ofVocationalEducation

StateDepartment ofLabor/JTPAEmployment

Security

OtherFundingSources

TotalFunding

AK 217,841 20,000 13,000 250,841AL 120,000 150,000 270,000AR 117,389 117,389AZ 40,000 50,000 15,000 105,000CACOCTDC 15,862 15,862DEFL 212,864 176,322 .587,400 976,586GA 306,600 185,000 491,600HI 50,936 740,132 791,068IA 10,000 24,000 15,000 12,000 4,000 65,000ID 175,000 106,210 60,000 341,210IL 57,000 82,488 37,500 57,500 80,000 90,000 404,488!N 30,000 115,000 30,000 175,000KS 125,000 125,000KY 39,800 39,800LAw1D 56,000 130,000 186,00E-ME 5,000 160,000 165,000MN 247,170 2,000 249,170

MO-C 7,000 7,000MO-V 32,800 130,000 162,800

MS73,595- 2,100 10,000 7,000 5,685 98,380MT

NC 30,000 13,000 43,000ND 14,200 1,800 16,000NE 120,000 14,636 79,950

75,000214,586--335,000Nr- 250,000 10,000

NM 51,000 51,000NV 131,685 84,406 216,091NYOHOK 62,093 62,093OR 580,000 5,000 7,150 592,150PAPR 332,412 332,412PWRI 66,000 66,000SC 230,246 127,364 190,706 548,316SD 64,060 9,360 73,420TN 130,000 130,000UT 70,000 70,000VAVT . 35,000 35,000WA 320,793 14,422 335,215WI 749,359 749,359

WY 21,000 25,000 46,000A 4, 3 , 61 91.,77 1,301,431 933,772 349,000 91s ,395 :, 2,836

% of TOTAL 51 % 10% 15% 10% 4% 10% 100%# of states

..,.26 21 _ 7 11 7 10

18

TABLE 2, cont.Funding Sources, 1992-1993

16

UserFees

'NOICC. BasicAssistance

Grant Appropriation

StateLegislative

StateD.O.E. orOffice of

VocationalEducation

StateDepartment of

Labor/JTPAEmployment

Security

OtherFundingSources

TotalFunding

AK 224,250 20,000 17,500 261,750AL 120,000 136,000 56,100 312,100AR 12 ,889 125,889AZ 40,000 52,000 15,000 107,000CACOCTDC 18,000 18,000DEFL 250,000 178,022 603,300 1,031,322GA 326,600 145,800 472,400HI 23,289 800,208 823,497IA 18,000

255,09920,000

-17,704 60,00015,000 8,000 61,000

430,803IDIL 62,000 86,488 37,500 57,500 80,000 90,000 413,488IN 30,000 115,000 130,000 275,000KSKY 40,040 40,040LAMD 90,000 150,000 240,000ME 4,000 140,000 144,000MN 325,709 1,000 326,709

MO-CMO-V 49,883 130,000 179,883

MSMT 78,760 9,500 10,000 7,000 3,655 108,915NC 10,000 17,000 13,000 40,000ND 16,000 2,000 18,000NE 140,000 18,596 87,000 245,596NJ L96,000 10,000 90,000 396,000

NM 30,000 16,000 46,000NV 143,900 93,500 237,400NYOHOK 60,298 60,298OR 612,500 11,500 48,000 672,000PAPR 84,915 84,915RI 88,250 88,250SC 240,000 134,764 190,700 565,464SD 63,921 13,000 76,921TN- 150,000 150,000UT-- 62,000 62,000VAVT 79,000 79,400 158,400WA 350,000 - 10,000 360,000

1 803,758 803,758WY 22,000 25,000 47,000

TOTAL 4,654,834 991,981 1,318,706 966,522 536,100 1,015,655 9,483,798% of TOTAL 49-% 10% 14% 10% 6% 11% 100%# of states 26 20 7 12 8 10

19

5,00

0,00

0

4,50

0,00

0

4,00

0,00

0

3,50

0,00

0

3,00

0,00

0

FUN

DS

2,50

0,00

0

2,00

0,00

0

1,50

0, 0

00

1,00

0,00

0

500,

000 0

2i)

FIG

UR

E 1

CH

AN

GE

S IN

SO

UR

CE

FU

ND

ING

, (FU

ND

S), 1

991-

1993

Use

r Fe

esN

OIC

C B

asic

Ass

ista

nce

Gra

nt

Stat

e

Leg

isla

tive

App

ropr

iatio

n

Stat

e D

.O.E

. or

Off

ice

of V

oc'l

Edu

catio

n

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

N=

34

Stat

e D

.O.L

.,O

ther

Fun

ding

JTPA

,So

urce

s

Em

ploy

men

tSe

curi

ty

1990

-199

1

0 19

91-1

992

819

92-1

993

21

Stat

es r

epor

ting

25 20 15 10

5 0

FIG

UR

E 2

CH

AN

GE

S IN

SO

UR

CE

FU

ND

ING

, (ST

AT

ES

RE

POR

TIN

G),

199

1-19

93

Use

r Fe

esN

O1C

C B

asic

Stat

eSt

ate

D.O

.E. o

rSt

ate

Oth

er f

undi

ng

Ass

ista

nce

Leg

isla

tive

Off

ice

of V

oc'l

D.O

.L./J

TPA

sour

ces

Gra

ntA

ppro

pria

tion

Edu

catio

nE

mpl

oym

ent

Secu

rity

Fund

ing

Sour

ces

N=

34

MI

1990

-199

1

o19

91-1

992

Ett

1992

-199

3

2 3

19

TABLE 3

CHANGES IN FUNDING -DECREASING, INCREASING, & STABLE, 1991-1993

DECREASING FUNDING 3 States1991-1992 1992-1993

User Fees 407,412 150,915

VOICC Basic Assistance Grant 0 0

State Legislative Appropriation 160,000 140,000

State D.O.E. or Office of Voc'l Education 0 0

State D.O.L., JTPA, Employment Security 0 0

Other Funding Sources 0 0

TOTAL 567,412 290,915

INCREASING FUNDING 15 States1991-1992 1992-1993

User Fees 1,630,565 1,966,201

VOICC Basic Assistance Grant 325,008 399,300

State Legislative Appropriation 60,000 60,000

"State D.O.E. or Office of Voc'l Education '614,950 628,000

State D.O.L., JTPA, Employment Security 242,000 433,100

Other Funding Sources 14,635 133,055

TOTAL 2,887,158 3,619,656

STABLE FUNDING - 20 States1991-1992 1992-1993

User Fees 2,372,384 2,537,718

VOICC Basic Assistance Grant 584,869 592,681

State Legislative Appropriation 1,081,431 1,118,706

Slate D.O.E. or Office of Voc'l Education 318,822 338,522State D.O.L., JTPA, Employment Security 107,000 103,000

Other Funding Sources 901,760 882,600

TOTAL 5,366,266 5,573,227

N = 34

FUN

DS

450,

000

400,

000

350,

000

300,

000

_

250.

000

_

200,

000

150,

000

100,

000

50,0

00

0

FIG

UR

E 4

CH

AN

GE

S IN

SO

UR

CE

FU

ND

ING

- D

EC

RE

ASI

NG

, 199

1-19

93

Use

r Fe

esN

OIC

C B

asic

Stat

e L

egis

lativ

eSt

ate

D.O

.E. o

rSt

ate

D.O

.L.,

Oth

er F

undi

ng

Ass

ista

nce

App

ropr

iatio

nO

ffic

e of

Voc

lJT

PA,

Sour

ces

Gra

ntE

duca

tion

Em

ploy

men

tSe

curi

ty

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

N =

3

tgE

199

1-19

92

0 19

92-1

993

28

2,00

0,00

0

1,80

0,00

0

1,60

0,00

0

1,40

0,00

0

1,20

0,00

0

FUN

DS

1,00

0,00

0

800,

000

600,

000

400,

000

200,

000 0

FIG

UR

E 5

CH

AN

GE

S IN

SO

UR

CE

FU

ND

ING

- I

NC

RE

ASI

NG

, 199

1-19

93

Use

r Fe

es

2;)

NO

ICC

Bas

icSt

ate

Stat

e D

.O.E

. or

Stat

e D

.O.L

.,O

ther

Fun

din2

Ass

ists

.-...

Leg

isla

tive

Off

ice

of V

oc'l

JTPA

,So

urce

s

Gra

ntA

ppro

pria

tion

Edu

catio

nE

mpl

oym

ent

Secu

rity

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

N =

15

1991

-199

2

r=1

1992

-199

3

39

3,00

0,00

0

2,50

0,00

0

2,00

0,00

0

FU

ND

S1,

500,

000

1,00

0,00

0

500,

000 31

FIG

UR

E 6

CH

AN

GE

S IN

SO

UR

CE

FU

ND

ING

- S

TA

BL

E, 1

991-

1993

Use

r Fe

esN

OIC

C B

asic

Stat

eSt

ate

D.O

.E. o

rSt

ate

D.O

.L.,

Oth

er F

undi

ng

Ass

ista

nce

Leg

isla

tive

Off

ice

of V

oc'l

JTPA

,So

urce

s

Gra

ntA

ppro

pria

tion

Edu

catio

nE

mpl

oym

ent

Secu

rity

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

N =

20

1991

-199

2

0 19

92-1

993

32

TABLE 4Additional Funding Breakdowns Relative To Total k unding

991-92 funding forresearch &

development

Percentage of 1991-92

TotalFunding

funding forevaluating CIDS

effectiveness

% ofTotal

Funding

TotalFunding1991-92

AK 8,788 4% 250,841AL 10,000 4% 2,000 1% 270,000AR 45,000 38% 117,389AZ 25,000 24 ,0 999 1% 105,000

CACOCTDC 0 0% 1,000 6% 15,862

DEFLGA 20,000 4% 5,000 1% 491,600HI 0 0% 2,540 0% 791,068IA 10,000 15% 65,000ID 8,000 2% 3,000 1% 341,210IL 20,224 5% 4,045 1% 404,488IN 0 0% 500 0% 175,000KS 25,000 20% 0 0% 125,000KYLAMD 1,500 1% 0 0% 186,000

ME 0 0% 0 0% 165,000MHMN 11,000 4% 249,170

MO-C1% 500 05 162,800MO-V 1,000

MS 0 0% 0 0% 0

MTNCND 0 0% 4,000 25% 16,000NE 50,000 23% 500 0% 214,586NJ 0 0% 0 0% 335,000NM 0 0% 0 0% 51,000NV 0 0% 0 0% 216,091NYOHOK 62,093 100% 62,093ORPAPR 18,500 6% 332,412RI 0 0% 500 1% 66,000SC 0 0% 548,316SD 9,800 13% 3,300 4% 73,420TN 20,000 15% 5,000 4% 130,000UT 0 0% 0 0% 70,000VA 100,000 29% 30,000 9% 339,980VT 15,000 43% 0 0% 35,000WA 30,369 9% 0 0% 335,215WI 75,000 10% 5,000 I % 749,359WY

TOTAL 556,274 7% 77,884 1% 7,489,900= 34

3 3

24

25TABLE 5

Total Funding, 1990-1993, as Compared with Estimated Need1990-1991 1991-1992 1992-1993 NEED

AK 258,911 250,841 261,750 261,750AL 320,000 270,000 312,100 345,000AR 115,824 117,389 125,889 35,000AZCACO 0 0 0 200,000CTDC 14,661 15,862 18,000 20,000DEFLGAHI 725,911 791,068 823,497 823,497IA 107,000 65,000 61,000 165,000ID 327,712 341,210 430,803 475,000IL 402,524 404,488 413,488 404,488IN 110,000 175,000 275,000 175,000KSKY 36,570 39,800 40,040 55,000LAMD 114,083 186,000 240,000 240,000ME 175,000 165,000 144,000 190,000MN 274,685 249,170 326,709 350,000

MO-CMO-V . 148,803 162,800 179,883 179,883

MS 0 0 0 50,000MTNC 43,000 43,000 40,000 45,000ND 17,100 16,000 18,000 14,000NE 212,636 214,586 245,596 275,000NJ 300,000 335,000 396,000 400,000

NM 75,000 51,000 46,000 75,000NV 216,822 216,091 237,400 350,000NYOHOK 49,858 62,093 60,298 62,000ORPAPR 22,856 332,412 84,915 115,000RI 66,000 66,000 88,250 150,000SC 617,951 548,316 565,464 600,000SD 70,851 73,420 76,92! 80,000TN 120,000 130,000 150,000 250,000UT 70,000 70,000 62,000 100,000VA 422,900 339,980 330,000 380,000VT 15,000 35,000 158,400 100,000WA 294,987 335,215 360,000 330,000WI 704,961 749,359 803,758 800,000WY 45,000 46,000 47,000 75,000

TOTAL 6,496,606 6,897,100 7,422,161 8,170,618N = 34

34

AI

,,.,, .

'...$ ::: , ,' ',- ,,,

t,4,'",,4.-' ..,..' , > - , ,,,;..- 4,......-...,:.....;,....,,-,::44::::::,....4,4,,,mi,,......*,;;;;,..w.i. ..,.` ..I.A...14:...p.:%.,,..`,...J. Z:a..;,As.1-..'"..sg,-..C.4

a4 '..:: S, ).'S CP. i44,'" 44,C {1.ZW

MiMME11111

S40

WI' Wie

W 50

, SS' N

SS

I....±..i..,....... s .....,...,......,.......,,,,:......e.,,,,,,,,:kSS, ,,v, ..,,,, ..... >.4 xi> ...... ,,,,.. , ..`,5v.,.....,,,S....., 1.......J..............., :,...,,,,`,...M.',..;:.4' >X

INI 0 5 MP Ia gi 0 S 0 di

4.1 MP I Iiab I fa 5 I

V I a, 1

Nex

a

TABLE 6

PERCEPTIONS OF THE REASONS FOR INCREASE OCCURRINGFROM 1990-1991 TO 1991-1992'

CHANGES IN FEDERAL FUNDING

Carl Perkins FundingMinnesota

Congress appointed additional funds for NO1CC/SOICC activitiesIllinois

Congressional leaders awareness of CIDS & its impact on economyNorth Dakota

Funding from the Department of Defense for incorporation of ASVAB in computerized C1DSSouth Dakota

InflationArizonaMissouri View

RecessionMinnesota

State FundsMaryland

CHANGES IN STATE FUNDING

CHANGES IN FUNDING POLICY

User fees instituted or increasedMarylandNebraskaWisconsinWyoming

Increases were planned based on 3 year contractIndiana

COIN LeaseMissouri View

USER BASE

Increased number of system user sitesIdahoNebraskaWisconsinMissouri ViewOregon

37

27

TABLE 6, cont.

Increase of client market/usersNevadaTennessee

Increased/larger user baseNew JerseyWashington

Expansion of CIDS in user organizations/agenciesDistrict of Columbia

Increasing use by adult-serving agenciesOregon

Increased marketingColorado

Sound marketingMinnesota

MARKETING

STAFFING

New position (adjustments for collective bargaining)Hawaii

Increase in staff development activitiesKansas

Hard work by staff to produce a respected productMinnesota

C1DS SOFTWARE IMPROVEMENTS

Additional information programs developmentKentucky

Major effort to evaluate and acquire a commercial CIDS systemVermont

C1DS HARDWARE IMPROVEMENTS

Adding microcomputer version for MS-DOS Hard Disc DriveNebraska

Sales increase due to launching a new system (IBM version)Puerto Rico

38

28

TABLE 6, cont.

REQUESTS FOR MONEY

Requested and received funds for development of CIDS related study plansOklahoma

VENDOR PRICES

Local payments/user fees made to software vendorsUtah

Small school consolidationsMinnesota

CONSOLIDATIONS

\

. 9

29

30

TABLE 7

PERCEPTIONS OF THE REASONS FOR DECREASES IN FUNDINGFROM 1990-1991 TO 1991-1992

CHANGES IN FEDERAL FUNDING

Carl Perkins legislation reduced monies availableFloridaIllinoisNebraskaNew MexicoVirginia

Absence of congressional leaders' awareness of CIDS & its impact on economyNorth Dakota

Carl Perkins funding delayedAlaska

Lack of U.S. D.O.E. emphasis on counseling and guidanceNew Mexico

Reallocation of discretionary Perkins fundsMissouri View

CHANGES IN STATE GOVERNANCE

Transfer of CIDS from D.O.E. to ISOICC; state legislature chose not to provide state fundingIowa

CHANGES IN STATE FUNDING

No guidance appropriationsNebraskaSouth Carolina

State legislative cutsMaineSouth Carolina

State deficitMaryland

State D.O.E. felt higher priority needs elsewhereNew Mexico

State with limited fundsNew Mexico

TABLE 8

31

WHAT IMPACT DID THE DECREASE (1990-1991 TO 1991-1992)HAVE ON THE CIDS OPERATION?

STAFFING

No increase in staffNebraskaSouth Carolina

Decrease in staffNew MexicoFlorida

ISOICC staff had to absorb CMS work loadIowa

No raises for staffSouth Carolina

SERVICES PROVIDED

User services reducedIowa

Cutbacks in travelSouth Carolina

Resulted in fewer free print materials to assist schools in career development programsSouth Carolina

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

Additional product development/enhancements reducedIowaMarylandSouth Carolina

Change in user feesNorth Carolina

Started charging user's feesMissouri ViewVirginia

FEES FOR USERS

COPING STRATEGIES

Utilized carry-over funds in user fees to maintain level and quality of CIDS servicesIllinois

41

TABLE 8, cont.

FUNDING FOR USERS

Virtual elimination of Incentive Grants for new usersMaine

Minimal impactMaine

MINIMAL IMPACT

OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

Change in operation proceduresNorth Carolina

USER SITES

Number of sites (annual renewals) decreasedFlorida

Several sites did not have money in their budgetsMissouri View

42

32

TABLE 9

33

TYPES OF ASSISTANCE C1DS NEED IN ORDER TO

COPE WITH FINANCIAL PROBLEMS

STATE SUPPORT AND GOVERNMENT FUNDING

State

Ability and support from state funding sourcesColoradoIndianaIowaVermont

Recognition and support of system by state legislation

ColoradoIowaNevada

Incentive/Special purpose grantsFloridaOregon

Federal

Ability and consistent support from federal funding sourcesAlabamaColoradoNew Mexico

Federal funds specifically for CIDS operationKansasNew Mexico

Special purpose grants to states to re-emphasize CIDS effortsMississippiNorth CarolinaOregon

Changes in JTPA and PerkinsIndiana

National control and administration of all related travel fundsVermont

More help with s6curing private funding grantsVirginia

43

TABLE 9, cont.

Other

More MoneyIllinoisKentuckyMissouri ViewNebraskaNevadaOklahomaRhode IslandWyoming

Sympathetic administrationAlaska

All kindsArizona

Broader definition of CIDSKansas

Additional staffNebraska

34

STABLE ECONOMY AND STABLE FUNDING

Stable economy/fundingGeorgiaMaineSouth Carolina

EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Vdlue of CIDS studiesAlaskaNevada

Need access to research and development fundsWisconsin

Continuing research and development projects to insure state of the art delivery systems.Nevada

CONSULTING RESOURCES

Information ana 'assistance with marketing on a professional basisMarylandNebraska

44

TABLE 9, cont.

35

FUNDING MODIFICATION

Reduced cost of vendor software programsMaine

PUBLICITY PACKAGES

Development of a publicity package to use to secure additional fundingDistrict of Columbia

Ancillary projects like NCDGMinnesota

NOICC, ACSCI and the National Career Development Institute can mount a massive PRcampaign to promote CIDS.

Rhode Island

National brochure to convince legislatives, school committees, and educational governingboards to fund CIDS.

Rhode Island

STATISTICS

Continued data collection and analysis of labor market and education statistics.Minnesota

TRAINING RESOURCES

Assistance in providing responsive customer service: training, technical assistance andcustomer service. CIDS that fail seem to do a poor job of this.

Idaho

MORE ENCOURAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT

More encouragement to develop information and products along with a requirement for aminimal staffing level of two full-time employees in each state.

Vermont

NO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS

CIDS should not have financial problems. If operated well, they can be self-supporting.Ongoing development could benefit with outside funding, but if approached correctly, manyefforts can be supported through special project grants at local and state levels.

Oregon

45

I

ALARAZCACOCTDCDE

INIININGAHI

I I

D D D :. \

:

. 0

X

111111U21=1111111E.M111IDILINKS

LAMDMEMN

X

MSMT

NENJ

NMNVNYOHOKORPAPR

SD

11111E111111INNIMINIII

VAVTWA

WY0 AL

0 OF OTAL12

40 o11

37%

e

D " D 0

: :

. : I

P li I 10 P ,

0

IAl

3IIKIIM

2083%

00%

I

4%

t I

AKALARAZCACOCTDr

x

DEFLGAHIIAIDILINKSKY

MNMO-CMO-

.x

x

=SIM=a1IMIMIIllral

ND

111111121NMNV1=21.OH

miLe;mitimmPA

IMILIMINIIRI

=ENNIOmougm.1111111EININI1111111111M

VA

IIIMITMEINmzammiimam=imam=0 A

xx

p1

,

x

:

x

x

IM.111MI=

x

x

x

x

xxx

1:111:1'D

IP 5

R V

o

x

x

x

x

x

=MIIIILINI

ti

.

ALARAZCACOCTDCDEFLGAHI

IDILINKSKYLAMDMEMN0-C

MO-V

10 b 5 ' III III II : I II II

. .

MSMTNC

NENJ

EMMIlli.

NMNVNY

OKOR

1111701111MPRRISCSDTNUT

IIIIMMIVT

MZOI=1111111161!

WY

e '-

:

I r r P P I 0

-,

00%

00 0

00%

TABLE 11

39

ENABLING LEGISLATION

STATE

Colorado Legislature reluctant education spenders; recent amendments hamstringingColorado education.

Colorado

Recent legislation requires a career plan for all students by 1994-95Indiana

Kentucky Revised StandardsKentucky

Mississippi Senate Bill No. 2735Mississippi

NJSA 34:1A - 76New Jersey

State budget, 1979, set up WCIS within University of WisconsinWisconsin

State legislative special education fundsNew Mexico

State Line Item 514Ohio

12th Hawaii Legislative Session, Act 193Hawaii

1992 Legislation requiring all high schools to have a computerized student advisementsystem providing career and educational information.

Florida

26 ME Revised Statutes Annotated, Section 1452Maine

4 9

40

TABLE 11, cont.

FEDERAL

Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Act of 1990, Title 4, Part C, Sections422 (a) and 451 (a).

ArkansasHawaiiIdahoNebraskaSouth CarolinaTennessee

Job Training Partnership Act of 1982, Sections 125 & 464ArkansasHawaiiIdahoSouth Carolina

NOICC enabling federal legislationAlabama

Several legislationsMissouri Choices

FIG

UR

E 8

PER

CE

IVE

D S

EC

UR

ITY

OF

FUN

DIN

G F

OR

CID

SO

PER

AT

ION

DU

RIN

G T

HE

CO

MIN

G T

WO

YE

AR

S

num

ber

of s

tate

s10

8 6

51

Use

r Fe

esN

OIC

C B

asic

Stat

eD

.O.E

. or

Stat

e D

.O.L

.,O

ther

Ass

ista

nce

Leg

isla

tion

Voc

'1JT

PA,

or

Gra

ntA

ppro

pria

t'nE

duca

tion

Em

ploy

men

tO

ffic

eSe

curi

ty

Fund

ing

Sour

ces N =

34

1111

Inc

reas

e E

xpec

ted

0 Pr

esen

t Lev

el E

xpec

ted

Smal

l Cut

Exp

ecte

d

gj B

ig C

ut E

xpec

ted

0 E

limin

atio

n E

xpec

ted 52

TABLE 12CIDS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT FOR STATE CIDS

AKALARAZCACOCTDCDEFLGAHIIAIDILINKSKYLAMAMDMEMN

MO-CMO-V

MSMTNCNDNENHNJNMNVNYOHOK-ORPAPRRISCSI)INUTVAV 1

WAWI

-WVWY

101AL% 01 101"AL

= 41

42

SOICC

St. Dept ofLabor/

Economic orEmployment

Security

St. Dept ofEducation or

Office ofVocationalEducation

StateCollege

orUniversity Other

X X X

XX X

.-

X

X X'X

X.

X .

XXXX X X X ..X.X

XX

X

X X X X

X

X

XX

X

XXX

X

XX

X

XX X

XXX X

XX X

XX X X

_ XX

28 8 11 S 7

68% 20% 23% 12% 17%

53

Oth

er

Stat

e co

llege

or

univ

ersi

ty

Stat

e D

.O.E

. or

Voc

atio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffic

e

Stat

e D

.O.L

.. E

cono

mic

or

Em

ploy

men

t Sec

urity

SOIC

C

5 4

FIG

UR

E 9

TO

TA

L A

DM

INIS

TR

AT

IVE

AG

EN

TS

FOR

CID

S

05

1015

2025

30

N =

41

solc

c

0 St

ate

D.O

.L.,

Eco

nom

ic o

r E

mpl

oym

ent

Secu

rity

Stat

e D

.O.E

. or

Voc

atio

nal E

duca

tion

Off

ice

MA

Sta

te c

olle

ge o

r un

iver

sity

E]

Oth

er

5 5

TABLE 13

GOVERNING BOARD CHAIRS

Dr. Stephen B. Franks,Vocational Education DirectorState Department of EducationAlabama

Lonnie McNatt, DirectorArkansas Department of EducationVocational/Technical Educ. DivisionArkansas

Dr. Carlos ValenciaCalifornia State UniversityCalifornia

Dr. Smith, Co-ChairSuperintendent, DC Public SchoolsDistrict of Columbia

Maria Borten), Co-ChairDirector, Dept. of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia

Dr. Robert Watada, Administrator ofOETADLIR/Office of Employment and TrainingAdministrationHawaii

George Pellefier, AdministratorVocational RehabilitationIdaho

Chris Reynolds, 10ICC ChairpersonDept. of Commerce & Community AffairsIllinois

Steve Smith, ISOICC ChairIowa Dept. of Employment ServicesIowa

William Huston, SecretaryWorkforce Development CabinetKentucky

Charles A. Morrison, Chair/CommissionMaine Department of LaborMaine

Dr. Robert C. SchleigerRetired President of Chesapeake CollegeMaryland

Mr. Robert Larivee, DirectorSpecial Needs and Guidance ServicesMissouri Dept. of EducationMissouri

James P. Kiley, SuperintendentPershing County School DistrictNevada

Joel New, SOICC ChairNC Division of Employment and TrainingNorth Carolina

Roy Peters, DirectorOklahoma Dept. of Vocational &

Technical EducationOklahoma

Denise GudgerCounselor/AdministratorEugene School District 45Eugene, OR

Ramon Diaz Gomez, Governing BoardPresidentHouse RepresentativePuerto Rico

Robert E. David, SCOICC Executive BoardChairmanS.C. Employment Security CommissionSouth Carolina

Dee Esser, Executive Director, VO1CCVirginia Employment CommissionRichmond, VA

Wayne OlsenDivision of Vocational RehabiltationWisconsin

5 6

44

45

TABLE 14

ADVISORY BOARD CHAIRS

Judy Knight Mr. Marion Starr, Asst. DirectorDepartment of Labor, Employment Security Special Needs & Guidances ServicesAlaska Missouri Dept. of Education

MissouriBruce DaceyDe !ware Kay Raithel

Missouri ChoicesDr. Smith, Co-chair MissouriSuperintendent of Public SchoolsDistrict of Columbia Rosalie Wa'sh, Director

Student Gevelopment CenterMaria Borrero, Co-chair MontanaDirector, Dept. of Employment

Services Phillip A. BakerDistrict of Columbia Department of Labor

NebraskaMilton MartinGeorgia Department of Labor Tom VogelsongGeorgia Asbury Park Board of Education

New JerseyJoanne Swearingen, Educational SpecialistState Department of Education Robert WilliamsAnuenue Elementary School Marketing & Technical Assistance ManagerHawaii Pennsylvania SOICC

PennsylvaniaSteve Hawkes, CounselorSugar-Salem Junior-Senior High School Mildred T. NicholsIdaho RI Occupational Information Coordinating Committee

Rhode IslandDave Palya, Co-ChairpersonLockport High School Mr. Jim VinsonIllinois Tennessee State Department of Education

TennesseeDr. Jack Teal, Co-ChairpersonIllinois Central College Peter SchmidtIllinois Grays Harbor Community College

WashingtonLinda Piper, Executive DirectorINDOICC Wayne OlsenIndiana Division of Vocational

RehabilitationCarl Baldwin WisconsinMilitary Entrance Processing StationKentucky Mike Paris

Wyoming Occupational Coordinating CouncilJasmin Duckett WyomingMOICC DirectorMaryland

Marla Davenport, SupervisorTIESMinnesota

57

.01111111110111111111111H

IMM

IIIMM

EN

ION

.1111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111-

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

-101111111111111111111111111111110111111111111011111111

iiiii-

111111111101111111110111111111111111111101110.IM

AN

IIIIIIIININ

IMM

ININ

.111011110111111:N

UM

MIN

EM

EN

IIIIIIIIIIIIIMIH

NIIIIIIIN

.:

-1111111111111111110111010010111111111111

t-iiiiiiirniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiM

EM

EN

OiiiiiiiniiiiiiM

EM

EN

EM

IN..

-

:::iiiIIIIM

MiiiiiiiiM

INIM

INIM

EN

-.:11111111111111111

.1011110100111101111 MI

--I 18 M

INE

ME

ME

NI

I

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

SR

EPR

ESE

NT

ED

59

Oth

er

CID

S C

lient

s

CID

S U

sers

Priv

ate

Scho

ols

Priv

ate

Bus

ines

s

Eco

nom

ic D

evel

opm

ent

JTPA

Stat

e C

olle

ge o

r U

nive

rsity

Stat

e D

.O.E

. or

Off

ice

of V

oc'l

Edu

catio

n

Stat

e D

.O.L

./Eco

nom

ic o

rE

mpl

oym

ent S

ecur

ity

Stat

e D

epar

tmen

t or

Off

ice

ofV

oc'l

Reh

abili

tatio

n

SOIC

C

No

Gov

erni

ng o

r A

dvis

ory

Boa

rdE

xist

s

FIG

UR

E 1

0

STA

TE

CID

S G

OV

ER

NIN

G A

ND

AD

VIS

OR

Y B

OA

RD

S

05

10

N =

45

1520

2530

NU

MB

ER

OF

CID

S R

EPO

RT

ING

3540

45 6 9

:

41 9 9

'

St

'

II

:.

9

II 5

0,

1 "o

:

AL 19

AR 28 o22 o Uft 1 . 5 o

12 % IIk 24 o

AZCA

46 o 14 o

10 %CO 60 % 10 o 20 %

CTDC 30 o 17 % 18 % 18 % 18 %

DE 23 % 2 o 18 o 2 o 33 %

L 9 o 19 o i.GA MEMEMMUMUMME 19 ° 20 o . 6 o 9 o

HIIAD

111111MINI

=MEMMitiMill

1 %14 o4 o

21 o 7 %

9 o.,. 20 o

19 o30 o IIMAMIllian.

8 %,

2713 % 1 ' .

6 o 9 o4 o

9 o

1 o

KSKYLA1 D

19 o

14 o40 o

iliaMilitaillii30 o 30 o

9 o

6 % 11 % 30 %

11 % ".

MNMO-CMO-V

19 o

15 %

25 % IIIKEMI14 %

11 % 20 o 11 %

".

MS 33 o 50 o 8 o 8 o

MT 20 o Minininikill 38 o 20 o

NDNE MIEFAINEEEEME

.

20 o

16 %

30 o 50 o

MEM 20 o

1\11 MEMIMINEILMMUIREEM 33 % 3 o

k

13 o18 %

=ffilMIIMEMEI

40 °altallEniaill.IMEMEMMICIMI

24 °

9 o ..

21%OKOR

A

PREMEMMIEJMSC

I

IT

20 o70 o

EMILMEIMEMillIRELIIM1111011111U24 o

MEM

4° .°

18 o30100 o

MUNE

13 % 20 o ".

7 %

IMREMEMMUM20 .°

MEEEMENEUME13 %40 o

MEM -' 7 %

".

33 %.

20 o 20 o20 oVA 19 % 0 o 14 o 30 o 1 %

iiiiiMMELEMMEMELEMMiliME41 o 8 %

19 o

, 1 'o 14 o

40 o

14 o3 % 3 o18% ". 16 %

14 %

WAWWY

13 o

MEMilliE111136 %

MMUS 20 ".MED

8 % 20 12 %

5,45

(< c

;K.., 5,, " %, , s, , ,

;:',//1

7145,

,A5 S5S55S55S

s:

55555555555555555.5555

Si

.

;Z.

tZ

5 0

0 tf)

51

TABLE 17

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Although Eureka leases/licensing agreement with NCIS, we do about 90% of our ownprogramming and information development. The EUREKA CIS software is different from CISas developed in Oregon.

California

This is purely an enterprise operation, under a non-profit umbrella. Previously, COCIS wasoperated by state government entities. It failed there, spending more than it took in. Itenjoys no outside support. Hence, there is no large staff. Now the staff is minimal, but theoperation is not failing. It provides a largely public service (schools, higher ed) withoutpublic support.

Colorado

Our function is more than CIDS. Difficult to separate fundings (state versus federal for justthose functions). I'm not sure data submitted will reflect the true picture of what you'retrying to represent. Employees are full time but again their responsibilities are more thanCIDS.

Florida

Our CIDS is evolving from primarily a computer-based system to one which focusesprimarily on staff development.

Kansas

Type of CIDS assumes that all CIDS must be computer based. The delivery of careerinformation, if systematic, includes: computer based material, lectures, workshops, videomaterials and curriculum materials that make the use of career information easier for endusers within a variety of agency and programmatic settings.

Maine

We use both type of CIDS. We have our own in-state system that is supplemented byCOIN.

Missouri View

Vendor provides all services but works with SOICC to coordinate CIDS activities in thestate.

Mississippi

Type of CIDS: A system leased to local sites directly from developer. SOICC adds stateinformation at no charge.

North Dakota

The New Mexico CIDS has gone from full time "full support" staff to parttime "crisis" staffand is in serious jeopardy of being eliminated within two years. New Mexico SOICC hasbeen and will continue to devote considerable time and effort for fundraising.

New Mexico

TABLE 17, cont.

Type of CIDS: A state-based system in consortium with other state-based systems forongoing developments with state staff responsible for management, user services, deliverysystems, information analysis, and program development.

Oregon

During the 1991-1992 period we supported the research and acquisition efforts thatresulted in the selection of the CHOICES-CT CIDS software for the Employment and TrainingDepartment. We will also enter into an agreement that will allow us to act as theadministrators of a consortium of users within state government (i.e., schools andagencies). We plan to continue development and distribution of a free state developed CIDS

that will be offered as an alternative.Vermont

_

67

52

Ass

ocia

tion

of C

ompu

ter-

Bas

ed S

yste

ms

for

Car

eer

info

rmat

ion

AC

OtiS

OFF

nuM

FO

R s

TA

M L

AR

DS

AN

D T

RA

ININ

G T

O A

DV

AN

CE

CA

RE

ER

IN

FOR

MA

TIO

N D

EL

IVE

RY

SY

STE

MS

,:une 25. 1992

TO FR

OM

Szus

icr,

Stat

e C

IDS

Ope

rato

rsRobert Lofft, ACSCI Clearinghouse Coordinator

1992 CIDS Information Collection Torm

Earlier this year, NOICC published the CIDS Status Report,

which was

produced in cooperation with ACSCI.

This project has led to further

cooperation between

noIc

cand ACSC/. resulting in the combination of

their annual CIDS surveys into a single form. Some ofthe information

che enclosed form requests, the same as in previous years,

will

appear in the 1993 ACSCI Directory, to bemailed to all CIDS at no

charge.

Additionally, NOICC is developing a database on CIDS that

will be available to system operators. SOICCs, and researchers.

Part

of the form is simiiar to last year's ACSCI survey.

Part I/

has questions on the financial status of CIDS.

The data from Part II

will be summarized in a NOICC report by Dr. James P. Sampson,

Jr., of

the Clearinghouse for Computer-AssistedGuidance Systems at Florida

State University.

NOICC plans to have the report ready in time for

the 1992 ACSCI Annual Conference. December

2-4, in St. Louis.

The financial questions are a one-time effort toclarify the fiscal

envi,I onment in wnich CODS operate.

Those who prepared the survey

tried to minimize your response burden and

still obtain the

information required for a much-needed national profile of

CIDS

programs.

Your responses will help in the effort to showhow

valuable CODS are as national and state information resources.

In those states where the

ems

is not operated by the SOICC, a copy

of this letter and the form has been sent to the

SOICC.

You may wish

to discuss this data request with your

SOICC director.

Please mail your completed survey to the ACSCIClearinghouse by

July 11. Airy questions you may have are welcome;

call me at (503)

14;;-299$,. Office hours are 9 to 5. Pacific Time.

Thank you,

cc:

SOICCs

xee

yr: V

er.

arm

r., r

rya

.'e

rYr

MO

scl

rorl

'A. A

,Ir

aay

TA

' Cfr

Zg

Win

Mar

rYA

I

MIT

(.0

scot

uur,

mck

viln

PrI

g P

LtX

nPn

ALS

OclupecoctzE

(Yrr

yre

r to

wn

Sur

rnyc

nC

orkf

w ie

AD

ocre

ed T

win

any

(43

or*,

,-<

>"

NA

n.cA

n C

am r

e,no

tn 'o

wn

flMC

A.e

* C

am*

FA

xo,o

n'e

tr.m

ano

nrg

*O

at, H

1C

ow,n

kyrw

o,iN

gon

171?

Av.

Ste

elW

oo k

t411

:41.

4.-0

,Pa

YIr

qS0

Lre.

./eP

06:

n 04

711

4Arr

y d

Orv

altr

a1I1

eelb

5056

.7ric

tron

d C

A 0

4!01

.ou

cbo

mb

OR

WA

D-U

M(a

l C7

750

Co

MA

UIS

M 3

,440

6

68

CID

S In

form

atio

n C

olle

ctio

n Fo

rm

Nam

e of

Sys

tem

:

Mai

ling

Add

ress

Pack

age

Del

iver

y

Add

ress

(if

dif

fere

nt):

Nat

iona

l Occ

upat

iona

l Inf

orm

atio

n C

oord

inat

ing

Com

mitt

eean

d th

eA

ssoc

iatio

n of

Com

pute

r-B

ased

Sys

tem

s fo

r C

aree

r In

form

atio

n

Plea

se m

ail b

y Ju

ly 3

1 lo

:

AC

SCI

Cle

arin

ghou

se20

0 A

gate

Hal

lU

nive

rsity

of

Oeg

onE

ugen

e, O

R 9

7403 N

ine.

Dig

h Z

ip Zip

Tel

epho

ne:

)E

xt.

Fax

Num

ber

C)

Ext

.

Part

IC

IDS

Dat

a an

d D

eliv

ery

NameofhWividtml

CompleangPanlofthisSunTy:

Item

l: U

seoj

Com

mon

Dat

ain

01Sa

ndC

IDS

a D

ees

your

CD

DS

inte

rfac

ewith

you

rOIV

O Y

es0 No

Uso.how:

b.Uyes.whkhoftefollowMghemsofinfmmmiionareusedMbothqmwm0Pkasechmk:

ocu

rren

t(ba

sera

r)em

ploy

men

tsiz

eO

proj

atod

empl

oym

mts

ir.e

0 gr

owth

rat

e

Overgemmalopenings

Oimiusqlocatimu(s)ofacupalions

Osupplydam

0 re

late

d C

IP/e

d co

ies

and

title

s0

supp

ly/d

eman

d da

ta0 wage and

sala

ry d

ata

0 st

ate

licen

sure

info

rmat

ion

0 ot

her

c. C

an y

ou p

rovi

de e

xam

ples

of

how

you

r O

IS a

nd C

IDS

disp

lay

this

info

rmat

ion

from

a c

omm

onoc

cupa

tion?

0 Y

es0

Exa

mpl

e en

clos

ed0

No

BE

ST

CO

PY

69

Item

2: O

ccup

atio

nal C

odin

g St

ruct

ure

and

Inte

rfac

ea.

Wha

t cod

ing

syst

em(s

) is

(ar

e) u

sed

to p

rese

nt in

form

atio

n to

use

rs o

n th

e oc

cupa

tions

in y

our

syst

em?

0 SO

CU

Dar

0 O

ES

0 M

il0

°ow

:

b. W

hat c

ross

wal

ks d

o yo

u us

e fo

r in

form

atio

n de

velo

pmen

t pur

pose

s?

Syst

em c

ode

to C

OT

0 I'M

No

Syst

em c

ode

to S

OC

0 Y

es0

No

Syst

em c

ode

to O

ES

0 Y

es0

No

Syst

em c

ode

to G

OE

0 Y

es0

No

Syst

em c

ode

to O

P0

Yes

0 N

oSy

stem

cod

e to

Mil

0 Y

es0

No

0 O

ther

c.A

re th

ese

crce

swal

ks p

rodu

ced

by 0

you

r st

ate

or 0

the

syst

em d

evel

oper

?

d. D

oes

your

sys

tem

hav

e an

on-

Lin

e ca

pabi

lity

for

user

s to

ent

er a

n oc

cupa

tiona

l cod

e fr

oma

diff

eren

t tax

onom

y (e

.g.,

OE

S, D

OT

.

MO

S) a

nd id

entif

y th

e re

late

d oc

cupa

tion

in y

our

syst

em?

0 Y

es0

No

If s

o. p

leas

e de

scnb

e:

e.H

ave

you

obta

ined

cro

ssw

alk

file

s fr

om th

e N

atio

nal C

ross

wal

k Se

rvic

e C

ente

r?0

Yes

0 N

oIf

not

, wou

ld y

ou li

ke to

rec

eive

info

rmat

ion

abou

t its

ser

vice

s?0

Yes

0 N

o

I It

em 3

: Edu

catio

n an

d T

rain

ing

Info

rmat

ion

and

Lin

kage

's

a.W

hat t

ypes

of

educ

atio

n an

d tr

aini

ng f

iles

art a

vaila

ble

in y

our

syst

em:

0 Po

stse

cond

ary

prog

ram

s of

stu

dy0

Nat

iona

l0

Scho

ol s

ubje

cts

0 N

atio

nal

0 A

ppr

entic

eshi

p0

Nat

iona

l0

Mili

tary

/arm

ed s

ervi

ces

0 N

atio

nal

0 V

ccat

iora

l/tcc

hnic

al s

choo

ls0

Nat

iona

l0

Porp

riet

ary

scho

ols

0 N

atio

nal

0 Pu

blic

two-

year

col

lege

s0

Nat

iona

lo

Publ

ic f

oury

ear

colle

ges

0 N

atio

nal

0 G

radu

ate

scho

ols

0 N

atio

nal

0 St

ate

oSL

IM

0 St

ate

0 St

ate

0 St

ate

0 St

ate

oS:

lte0

Stat

e0

Stat

e

b. A

re th

e pr

ogra

ms

of s

tudy

link

ed to

occ

upat

ions

?0

Yes

0 N

o

If s

o. w

hat i

s th

e to

sis

for

esta

blis

hing

this

link

age?

c.A

re th

e pr

ogra

ms

of s

tudy

link

ed to

hoot

s?0

Ycs

0 N

o

If s

o. w

hat i

s th

e ba

sis

for

esta

blis

hing

this

link

age?

d. C

an y

ou p

rovi

de a

n ex

ampl

e of

thes

e lin

kage

s?0

Yes

0 E

xam

ple

encl

osed

0 N

o

2

70

Item

4: S

elec

tion

of O

ccup

atio

nsa_

On

wha

t bas

is a

re o

ccup

atio

ns s

elec

ted

for

incl

usio

n in

you

r C

MS?

b. A

rt th

e pr

oced

ures

for

sel

ectin

g th

e oc

cupa

tions

so

be in

clud

ed in

you

r sy

stem

pro

duce

d by

0 yo

ur s

tate

, 0 th

e sy

stem

dev

elop

er, o

r 0

both

?

c.If

you

pro

duce

you

r ow

n se

lect

ion

proc

edur

es, c

an y

ou p

rovi

de a

cop

y?0

Yes

0 C

opy

encl

osed

0 N

o

d. I

f yo

u ob

tain

you

r sy

stem

fro

m a

noth

er e

kvel

oper

. do

you

0 ad

d st

ate

occu

patio

ns o

r 0

deve

lop

a st

ate

file

of

ocei

mat

iens

?

Item

S: U

ser

Site

Inf

orm

atio

nA

Use

r Si

te is

def

med

as

a lo

catio

n w

here

you

r sy

stem

(st

ruct

ured

acc

ess

plus

info

cmat

ion

file

s) is

act

ually

in u

se. D

o no

t cou

nt a

sus

er s

ites

any

loca

tions

that

hav

e on

ly in

form

atio

n fi

les

for

refa

ence

pur

pose

s. I

n en

teri

ng th

e nu

mbe

r of

Iss

as f

or e

ach

site

cat

egor

y,us

e an

act

ual c

ount

or

an e

stim

ate

of th

e nu

mbe

r of

indi

vidu

als,

not

the

num

ber

of tr

ansa

ctio

ns, o

ver

a ye

ar's

tim

e- E

nter

the

figu

res

for

your

rum

( ye

as ja

m e

nded

(or

abo

ut to

end

). F

or s

choo

l site

s, if

the

num

ber

of in

divi

dual

use

rs is

not

kno

wn,

and

you

hav

e no

othe

rba

sis.

for

estim

atin

g us

age,

use

as

your

est

imat

e tw

o th

inis

of

the

num

ber

of s

tude

nts

enro

lled

at th

e sc

hool

s. O

ther

way

s to

est

imat

e th

enu

mbe

r of

use

rs in

clud

e (I

) re

port

s fr

om s

ite c

oced

inat

ors.

(2)

the

num

ber

of u

ser

hand

book

s di

stri

bute

d. a

nd (

3) s

ite m

otdt

orin

g.

Num

ber

of S

ites

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ools

Juni

or H

igh

or M

iddl

e Sc

hool

sSe

nior

ffi

gh S

choo

lsV

ocat

iona

l.Tec

hnie

sl I

nstit

utes

Prir

ate

Voc

atio

nal S

choo

ls2-

Yea

r Ju

nior

or

Com

mun

ity C

olle

ges

4.Y

ear

Col

lege

s sn

d U

nive

rsiti

es

Em

ploy

men

t & T

rain

ing

Age

ncie

s (J

TPA

)E

mpl

oym

ent S

ervi

ce O

ffic

esC

orre

ctio

nal I

nstit

utio

taR

ehab

ilita

tion

Age

ncie

sC

ouns

elin

g A

genc

ies

Mili

tary

Bas

esPu

blic

Lib

rari

esPr

ivat

e B

usin

esse

s

Oth

ers

(ple

ase

list)

:

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

sdrn

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

cOm

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

Num

ber

of U

sers

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imm

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imae

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

0 A

ctua

l 0 E

stim

ate

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

e0

Act

ual 0

Est

imat

eT

OT

AL

S:

Item

6: K

inds

of

Del

iver

y M

edia

Che

ck th

e ap

popr

iate

box

es to

indi

cate

the

deliv

ery

med

ia y

ou u

se, a

nd e

nter

the

num

ber

of s

ites

at w

hich

the

med

ia a

re u

sed.

Site

sth

at h

ave

mor

e th

an o

ne f

orm

of

deliv

ery

med

ia a

re to

be

coun

ted

in e

ach

appr

opri

ate

cate

gory

. For

exa

mpl

a A

ach

ool t

hat h

as b

oth

mic

roco

mpu

ter

and

need

le-s

ort d

eliv

ery

med

ia w

ould

be

coun

ted

corm

in e

ach

cate

gory

. Thu

s, th

e nu

mbe

r of

site

s fo

r al

l cat

egor

ies

here

, if

tota

led,

may

exc

eed

the

actu

al to

tal n

umbe

r of

site

s in

dica

ted

in I

tem

5. U

se f

igur

es f

or th

e sa

me

time

peri

od a

s us

ed f

orIt

em 5

(the

fis

cal y

ear

just

end

ed o

r ab

out t

o en

d).

Del

iver

y M

edia

:N

umbe

r of

Site

s

0 M

anua

l (e.

g.. n

eedl

e-so

rt p

lus

book

s or

fic

he)

0 M

icro

com

puta

s (f

ull s

yste

m)

0 M

icro

com

pute

rs w

ith b

ooks

or

fich

e

Tun

e-sh

are4

com

pute

r

Prim

ary

Del

iver

y Sy

stem

:0

CIS

0 C

HO

ICE

S0

CO

IN0

DIS

CO

VE

R0

GIS

0 O

ther

:

3

71

Oth

er in

form

atio

n Pr

oduc

ts a

nd S

ervi

ces:

0 In

tera

ctiv

e vi

deo

Num

ber

of s

ites:

0 D

ial-

up h

otlin

eN

umbe

r of

use

rs:

0 N

ew S

iCtle

r fo

r si

tes

Num

ber

of c

opie

s, la

st L

ISL

IVFr

eque

ncy

of p

ublic

atio

n:0

Car

eer

tabl

oid

Num

ber

of c

opie

s. la

st:

Freq

uenc

y of

pub

licat

ion:

0 O

ther

(pl

ease

des

cnbe

l:

Doe

s yo

ur s

yste

m f

ollo

w th

e A

CSC

I St

anda

rds

for

Del

iver

y Sy

stem

s?0

Yes

0 N

o

Item

7: C

IDS

Tra

inin

g Su

ppor

ta.

Doe

s 0

your

sta

te o

r 0

syst

em d

evel

oper

or

0 bo

th p

rovi

de g

ener

al tr

aini

ng to

use

r si

te p

erso

nnel

?If

so,

do

you

follo

w th

e A

CSC

I St

anda

rds

for

Mar

ketin

g an

d U

ser

Serv

ices

?0

Yes

0 N

o

b. D

oes

0 yo

ur s

tate

or

0 sy

stem

dev

elop

er o

r 0

both

pro

vide

cus

tom

ized

trai

ning

for

spe

ciA

ized

pop

ulat

ions

or

prog

ram

s, s

uch

as d

ispl

aced

wor

kers

. Equ

ity p

rogr

ams.

.IT

PA p

rogr

ams,

and

reh

abili

tatio

n pr

ogra

ms?

If

so. p

leas

e lis

t

C. D

oes

0 yo

ur s

tate

or

0 sy

stem

dev

elop

er o

r 0

both

pro

duce

a s

tand

ard

set o

f tr

aini

ng m

ater

ials

? If

so.

can

you

pro

vide

a

copy

?0

Yes

0 C

opy

encl

osed

0 N

o

Item

8: S

yste

m S

uppo

rt M

ater

ials

a. D

oes

0 yo

ur s

tate

or

0 sy

stem

dev

elop

er o

r 0

both

pro

duce

a u

ser

man

ual f

or u

ser

site

per

sonn

el?

b. (

(you

r M

ite p

rodu

ces

a sy

stem

man

ual,

can

you

prov

ide

a co

py?

0 Y

es0

Cop

y en

clos

ed0

No

Item

9: E

valu

atio

n St

udie

sa.

Doe

s yo

ur c

ros

follo

w th

e A

CSC

I St

anda

rds

for

Eva

luat

ion?

0 Y

es0

No

b. H

ave

ther

e be

en a

ny e

valu

atio

n st

udie

s pr

oduc

ed f

or y

our

stat

e C

IDS

prog

ram

with

in th

e pa

st f

ive

year

s?0

Yes

0 N

o

c.If

"Y

es,"

can

you

pro

vide

a c

opy?

0 Y

es0

Cop

y en

clos

ed0

No

d. H

ow d

o yo

u co

llect

use

r fe

edba

ck?

Plea

se p

ovid

e a

copy

of

any

surv

ey f

orm

s yo

u ha

ve u

sed

for

this

pur

pose

.0

Cop

y en

clos

ed

al I

tem

10:

Dev

elop

men

tal P

roje

cts

a. D

oes

0 yo

ur s

tate

or

0 sy

stem

dev

elop

ers

or 0

bot

h ha

ve a

ny d

evel

opm

enta

l pro

ject

s un

derw

ay o

r pl

anne

d fo

r th

een

hanc

emen

t of

your

cur

rent

CID

S?

Item

13:

Sea

rch

Var

iabl

esW

hat i

tem

s m

e us

ed to

sea

rch

for

occu

patio

ns in

you

r C

IDS?

DoW

rase

d ch

arac

teri

stic

=W

orke

r fu

nctio

ns (

data

, peo

ple.

thin

gs)

0 Y

es0

No

Gen

eral

edu

catio

n de

velo

pmen

t (G

ED

) 0

Yes

0 N

oSp

ecif

ic v

ozat

iona

l pim

p:ra

tion

(SV

P)0

Yes

0 N

oA

pdtu

des

0 Y

es0

No

GO

E in

tere

sts

0 Y

es0

No

Tem

pera

men

ts0

Yes

0 N

oPh

ysic

al d

eman

ds a

nd a

ctiv

ities

0 Y

es0

No

Env

iron

men

tal c

ondi

tions

0 Y

es0

No

Oth

er c

hara

cter

istic

=E

duca

tion

0 Y

es0

No

Sala

ry/e

arni

ngs

0 Y

es0

No

Com

mun

ityty

pe0

Yes

0 N

oSc

hool

sub

ject

s0

Yes

0 N

oR

elat

ed m

ilita

ry tr

aini

ng0

Yes

0 N

oR

elat

ed a

ppre

ntic

eshi

p0

Yes

0 N

oC

aree

r cl

uste

rs0

Yes

0 N

oL

ifes

tyle

/wor

k sc

hedu

le0

Yes

0 N

oO

ther

DY

es 0

No

Stan

dard

ized

test

s:H

olla

nd S

DS

0 Y

es0

No

Kud

er I

nter

est

0 Y

es0

No

OV

IS0

Yes

0 N

oSt

rong

-Cam

pbel

l0

Yes

0 N

oA

SVA

B0

Yes

0 N

oD

AT

0 Y

es0

No

GA

TB

0 ye

s0

No

Oth

er:

0 Y

es0

No

Oth

er0

Yes

0 N

o

a It

em 1

4: O

ther

Inf

orm

atio

n Fi

les

Wha

t oth

er f

iles

(bes

ides

Occ

upat

ions

and

Edu

catio

n/T

rain

ing)

are

incl

uded

in y

our

CID

S?

b.If

you

r ga

t has

any

pro

ject

s in

dev

elop

men

t, pl

ease

pro

vide

a b

rief

des

crip

tion,

or

send

any

des

crip

tive

mat

eria

ls.

Em

ploy

ers

0 Y

es0

No

0 D

escr

iptiv

e m

ater

ials

enc

lose

dJo

b B

ank/

Job

Plac

emen

t0

Yes

LIN

o

Eco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent

0 Y

es0

No

II I

tem

II:

Occ

upat

iona

l Inf

orm

atio

n D

evel

opm

ent

Plan

ners

0 Y

es0

No

a.D

oes

your

CID

S de

velo

p lo

cal o

ccup

atio

nal i

nfor

mat

ion?

0 Y

es0

No

Eib

lintr

ilPhy

0 Y

es0

No

h. D

oes

your

CID

S fo

llow

the

AC

SCI

Stan

dard

s fo

r In

form

atio

n D

evel

opm

ent?

0 Y

es0

No

Em

ploy

er V

isit

Res

urnk

0 Y

es0

Yes

0 N

o0

No

Item

12:

Occ

upat

iona

l Inf

orm

atio

nFi

nanc

ial A

id0

Yes

0 N

o

Wha

t kin

ds o

f oc

cupa

tions

fde

s ar

e av

aila

ble

in y

our

syst

em?

Oth

er:

0 Y

es0

No

Oth

er:

0 Y

es0

No

0 D

escr

iptio

n (d

utie

s, d

efin

ition

, wor

k co

n. a

ds)

0 N

atio

nal

0 St

ate

Oth

er:

0 Y

es0

No

0 R

equi

rem

ents

(en

try.

lie,

int,

*its

)0

Nat

iona

l0

Sum

0 E

cono

mic

(ea

rnin

gs. e

mpl

oym

ent,

outlo

ok)

0 N

atio

nal

0 St

ate

724

5

73

PAR

T I

I

Intr

oduc

tion

As

the

labo

r m

arke

t in

thc

Uni

ted

Stat

es b

ecom

es le

ss s

tabl

e, a

dole

scen

ts a

nd a

dults

are

mak

ing

incr

ease

d de

man

ds o

n C

aree

r In

form

atio

n D

eliv

ery

Syst

ems

(CID

S) to

pro

vide

info

rmat

ion

nece

ssar

y fo

r m

akin

g ca

reer

and

em

ploy

men

t dec

isio

ns. H

owev

er, i

n th

is ti

me

ofin

crea

sed

dem

and

for

the

serv

ices

C1D

S of

fer,

pub

lic f

undi

ng f

or th

eir

oper

atio

n is

in d

ange

r of

decl

inin

g.

C1D

S op

erat

ors,

fac

ed w

ith im

pend

ing

chan

ge in

fun

ding

sou

rces

and

am

ount

s, n

eed

anan

alys

is o

f ba

selin

e da

ta th

at d

escr

ibes

the

curr

ent f

inan

cial

sta

tus

of C

IDS

in th

e U

nite

d St

ates

.C

IDS

oper

ator

s al

so n

eed

data

on

man

ager

ne.n

and

sta

ffin

g pa

ttern

s, s

ince

per

sonn

el c

osts

are

am

ajor

ele

men

t in

CID

S bu

dget

s. T

he a

naly

sis

aud

data

will

allo

w o

pera

tors

to m

ake

com

pari

sons

amon

g O

DS.

For

exa

mpl

e, a

CID

S op

erat

or c

ould

eva

luat

e ch

ange

s in

fun

ding

and

sta

ffm

gw

ithin

its

stat

e, in

corp

orat

ing

a ge

nera

l com

pari

son

with

all

CID

S an

d sp

ecif

ic c

ompa

riso

ns w

ithC

IDS

that

hav

e si

mila

r ch

arac

teri

stic

s.

Prel

imin

ary

fina

ncia

l sta

tus

and

staf

fing

dat

a w

ere

colle

cted

, but

not

ana

lyze

d, a

s pa

rt o

f la

stye

ar's

NO

ICC

/AC

SCI

annu

al d

ata

colle

ctio

n ef

fort

. The

goa

l of

this

par

t of

the

curr

ent s

urve

y is

to c

olle

ct, a

naly

ze, a

nd d

isse

min

ate

base

line

data

to h

elp

CID

S op

erat

ors

and

stat

ean

d fe

dera

lpo

licy

mak

ers

arri

ve a

t wel

l-in

form

ed d

ecis

ions

abo

ut th

e fi

nanc

ing

and

staf

fing

of

CID

S.

Fina

ncia

l Sta

tus,

Org

aniz

atio

nal S

truc

ture

, Sta

ff, a

nd C

IDS

Typ

e

Indi

vidu

al C

ompl

etin

g T

his

Form

:

Nam

e:

Add

ress

!

Phon

c(

DIR

EC

TIO

NS:

Ple

ase

fill

in th

e ap

prop

riat

e bl

ank

and/

or c

ircl

e th

e ap

prop

riat

e le

tter

for

each

item

. Whe

nci

rclin

g th

e le

tter

for

-Oth

er,"

ple

ase

wri

te in

the

info

rmat

ion

requ

este

d.

A. F

INA

NC

IAL

ST

AT

US

I. C

HA

NG

E tr

4 C

IDS

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES:

A f

undi

ng s

ourc

e is

def

ined

as

anyo

rgan

izat

ion.

ent

ity, o

r gr

ay o

f in

divi

dual

s th

atco

nmbu

te f

unds

to th

e C

IDS

budg

et. I

t a c

ateg

ory

liste

d at

the

top

of th

e ne

xt p

age

is a

sou

rce

offu

ndin

g. in

dica

te th

e to

tal a

mou

nt in

dolla

rs f

or 1

999-

91. 1

9914

2. a

nd 1

992-

93 (

antic

ipat

ed f

undi

ng).

A f

undi

ng y

ear

is d

efin

ed a

s Ju

lyI

thro

ugh

June

30.

Inc

lude

tota

l

fund

ing

on th

e bo

ttom

line

. If

your

CID

S an

d SO

ICC

arc

com

bine

d, p

rovi

de th

e be

st e

StiM

ate

poss

ible

ofC

IDS

fund

ing.

74

Use

r fo

es

NO

ICC

Bas

ic A

ssis

tanc

e G

rant

NO

ICC

CID

S G

rant

Stat

e le

gisl

ativ

e ap

prop

riat

ion

Stat

e D

ept.

of E

d./ O

ffic

e of

Vac

. Ed.

Stal

e D

ept.

of L

abor

llT

PA /

ES

Oth

er (

iden

tify)

:

Oth

er (

iden

tify)

:

Oth

er (

iden

tify)

:

TO

TA

L F

UN

DIN

G:

1990

-91

1991

-92

1992

-93

2. F

or c

oMpa

riso

n pu

rpos

es, I

ndic

ate

the

tota

l am

ount

of

fund

ing

for

your

CID

S in

198

748.

July

I, 1

987

thro

ugh

June

30,

191

111:

3. W

hat a

mou

nt o

f fu

ndin

g w

as a

lloca

ted

in 1

991-

92 f

or r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent a

new

pro

gram

s ao

d pr

oduc

ts?

Tot

al r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent f

undi

ng:

$

4. W

hat a

mou

nt o

f fu

ndin

g w

as a

lloca

ted

in 1

991-

92 f

or e

valu

atin

g th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of y

our

C1D

S?T

otal

C1D

S ev

alua

tios

fute

ding

:$

S. I

ran

incr

ease

in f

undi

ng o

ccur

red

from

1990

-91

to 1

991-

92, b

rief

ly s

tate

you

r pe

rcep

tions

a th

e re

ason

s fo

r th

e in

crea

se:

4. I

f a

decr

ease

in f

undi

ng o

ccur

red

from

199

0-91

to19

91-9

2, b

riefly

sta

teyo

ur p

eree

ptio

seof

the

reas

ons

tor

the

decr

ease

:

7. I

f a

decr

ease

in f

undi

ng o

ccur

red

from

199

0-91

to 1

991-

92 w

hat I

mpa

ct d

id th

e de

crea

se h

ave

os th

eop

erat

ios

of th

e C

1DS?

11. W

hat t

ypes

des

ista

nce

do C

IDS

aee

d I o

rder

to c

ope

with

flna

ncia

l pro

blem

s?

9. W

hat t

otal

fund

iag

keel

Ls

seed

ed fo

r th

e su

stai

ned

sad

effe

dive

per

form

ance

of

your

CID

S?T

otal

am

ount

of

fund

ing

seed

ed:

$

67

75B

ES

T C

OP

Y ii

::eV

gLtL

E

10. W

hat i

s th

e re

lativ

e se

curit

y of

in-s

tate

fund

ing

for

your

CID

S' o

pera

tion

durin

g th

e co

min

g tw

o ye

ars?

Circ

le th

e le

tter

for

each

sou

rce

that

app

lies

and

chec

k ,/

the

one

mos

t acc

urat

e re

spon

se te

gard

ing

the

secu

rity

of th

e fu

ndin

g:

a F

undi

ng p

rovi

ded

by u

ser

fees

. if a

ny: s

kip

to b

if n

one:

0 In

crea

se e

xpec

ted

0 P

rese

nt le

vel e

xpec

ted

0 S

mal

l cut

exp

ecte

d 0

Big

cut

exp

ecte

d 0

Elim

inat

ion

expe

cted

b F

undi

ng p

rovi

ded

by N

O1C

C B

asic

Ass

ista

nce

Gra

nt, i

f any

: ski

p to

c if

non

e:0

Incr

ease

exp

ecte

d 0

Pre

sent

leve

l exp

ecte

d 0

Sm

all c

ut e

xpec

ted

0 B

ig c

ut e

xpec

ted

0 E

limin

atio

n ex

pect

ed

c F

undi

ng p

rovi

ded

by s

tate

legi

slat

ive

appr

opria

tion,

if a

ny; s

kip

to d

if n

one:

0 In

crea

se e

xpec

ted

0 P

rese

nt le

vel e

xpec

ted

0 S

mal

l cut

exp

ecte

d 0

Big

cut

exp

ecte

d 0

Elim

inat

ion

expe

cted

d F

undi

ng p

rovi

ded

by s

tate

dep

artm

ent o

f edu

catio

n or

offi

ce o

f voc

atio

nal e

duca

tion:

ski

p to

e if

non

e:0

Incr

ease

exp

ecte

d 0

Pre

sent

leve

l exp

ecte

d 0

Sm

all c

ut e

xpec

ted

0 B

ig c

ut e

xpec

ted

e F

undi

ng p

rovi

ded

by s

tate

dep

artm

ent o

f lab

or,IT

PA

. or

empl

oym

ent

skip

to f

if no

m0

Incr

ease

exp

ecte

d 0

Pre

sent

leve

l exp

ecte

d 0

Sm

all c

ut e

xpec

ted

0 B

ig c

ut e

xpec

ted

f Oth

er in

-sta

te s

ourc

e of

fund

ing

(writ

e in

):o

10=

192

expe

cted

0 P

rese

nt le

vel e

xpec

ted

0 S

mal

l cut

exp

ecte

d 0

Big

cut

exp

ecte

d

g O

ther

in-s

tate

sou

rce

of fu

ndin

g (w

rite

in):

0 In

crea

se e

xpec

ted

0 P

rese

nt le

vel e

xpec

ted

0 S

mal

l cut

exp

ecte

d 0

Big

cut

exp

ecte

d

0 E

lbni

natio

n ex

pect

ed

0 E

limin

atio

n ex

pect

ed

0 E

limin

atio

n ex

pect

ed

0 E

limin

atio

n ex

pect

ed

11. E

nabl

ing

Legi

slat

ion:

Ena

blin

g le

gisl

atio

n is

def

med

as

fede

ral,

stat

e, a

nd lo

cal l

egis

latio

n th

at p

rovi

des

the

lega

l man

date

for

the

finan

cing

and

ope

ratio

n of

you

r C

IDS

. Lis

t all

of th

e le

gisl

atio

n th

at r

elat

es to

the

finan

cing

and

oper

atio

n of

you

r C

IDS

:

B. O

RG

AN

IZA

TIO

NA

L S

TR

UC

TU

RE

1.T

be A

dmin

istr

ativ

e A

genc

y or

Age

ncie

s fo

r Y

our

CID

S: A

rt a

dmin

istr

ativ

e ag

ency

is d

efile

d as

a g

over

nmen

tal

entit

y th

at

mon

itors

. eva

luat

es, a

nd p

rovi

des

dire

ctio

n fo

r th

e op

erat

ion

of y

our

CID

S. P

leas

e ci

rcle

the

appr

opria

tele

tter(

s):

aS

OIC

Cb

Sta

te D

epar

trre

nt o

f Lib

or, E

cono

mic

, cr

Em

ploy

men

t Sec

urity

cS

tate

Dep

artm

ent o

f Edu

catio

n or

Offi

ce o

f Voc

atio

nal E

duca

tion

dS

tate

Col

lege

or

Uni

vers

itye

Oth

er fi

dent

ifyy

2. G

over

ning

Boa

rd fo

r Y

our

CID

S. A

gov

erni

ng b

oard

is d

efin

ed a

s a

grov

p of

indi

vida

sre

pres

entin

g va

rious

con

stitu

enci

es

that

mak

e de

cisi

ons

and

set p

olic

y re

late

d to

the

oper

atio

n of

you

r C

IDS

.

0 A

gov

erni

ng b

oard

exi

sts.

Nam

e an

d Jo

b T

itle

of B

oard

Cha

ir

Cha

ir's

Age

ncy/

Com

pany

/Org

aniz

atio

n:

Cha

ir's

Add

resr

0 N

o go

veni

ng b

oard

exi

sts,

3. If

a g

over

ning

boa

rd e

xist

s, th

e or

gani

zatio

ns r

epre

seat

ed in

clud

e th

e fo

llow

ing

(circ

le th

e le

tter

for

thos

e th

at a

pply

):

aS

OIC

Cb

Sla

te D

epar

tmen

t or

Offi

ce o

f Reh

abili

tatio

n

cS

tate

Dep

artm

ent o

f Lab

or. E

cono

mic

. or

Tim

ploy

men

t Sec

urity

dS

tate

Dep

artm

ent o

f Edu

catio

n or

()f

ree

of V

ocat

iona

l Edu

catio

n

eS

tate

Col

lege

or

Uni

vers

ityf

Job

Tra

'nin

g P

artn

ersh

ip A

ctg

Eco

norr

w: D

evel

opm

ent

hP

rivat

e B

usin

ess

iP

rivat

e S

choo

lsj

CM

S u

sers

(or

gani

zatio

ns W

at u

se C

1DS

-sup

pone

d se

rvic

es)

IcC

IDS

clie

nts

(indi

vidu

als

who

hav

e w

ed a

CID

S)

1O

ther

(id

entif

y)m

Oth

er (

iden

ufy)

768

BE

ST C

M'

4. A

dvis

ory

Boa

rd fo

r Y

our

CM

S. A

n ad

viso

ry b

oard

is d

efin

ed a

s a

grou

p of

indi

vidu

als

repr

esen

ting

vario

us c

onst

ituen

cies

that

mak

e re

com

men

datio

ns a

bout

the

desi

gn a

nd o

pera

tion

of y

our

CID

S.

0 A

n ad

viso

ry b

oard

exi

sts.

Nam

e an

d Jo

b T

itle

of B

oard

Cha

in

Cha

ir's

Age

ncy/

Com

pany

aOrp

niza

tion:

Cha

ir's

Add

resr

0 N

o go

vern

ing

boar

d ex

ists

.

5. If

an

advi

sory

boa

rd e

xist

s, th

e or

gani

zatio

ns r

epre

sent

ed o

n th

e bo

ard

incl

ude

(circ

le th

e le

tter

for

all t

hree

that

app

ly):

aS

OIC

C

bS

tare

Dep

ortm

ent o

r O

ffice

of R

ehab

ilita

tion

cS

tate

Dep

attm

ent o

f Lab

or, E

cono

mic

, cc

Em

ploy

men

t Sec

urity

dS

tate

Dep

artm

ent o

f Edu

catio

n or

Offi

ce o

f Voc

atio

nal E

duca

tion

eS

tate

Col

lege

or

Uni

vers

ity

fJo

b T

rain

ing

Pxm

ersh

ip A

ct

gE

cono

mic

Dev

elop

men

t

hP

rivat

e B

usin

ess

iP

rivat

e S

choo

ls

CID

S u

sers

(or

gani

zatio

ns th

at u

se C

IDS

-sup

port

ed s

ervi

ces)

lcC

IDS

clie

nts

(indi

vidu

als

who

hav

e us

ed 2

CID

S)

IO

ther

(id

entif

y)

m O

ther

(id

entif

y)

C. T

ITL

E, F

TE

, AN

D R

ESP

ON

SIB

ILIT

IES

FOR

CID

S ST

AFF

A ti

tle is

def

ined

as

the

offic

ial e

mpl

oym

ent t

itle

of th

e in

cum

bent

. FIE

is d

efin

ed a

s F

ull T

ime

Equ

ival

ency

, e.g

., a

full-

time

staf

fm

embe

r w

ould

equ

al L

OR

E, a

hal

f-tim

e st

aff m

embe

r w

ould

equ

al 0

.5 F

TE

, and

a q

uart

er-t

ime

staf

f mem

ba w

ould

equ

al 0

.25

FM

.R

espo

nsib

ilitie

s ar

e de

fuse

d as

cat

egat

ies

of r

ecog

niza

ble

job

task

s.

Nam

e:

Pho

ne:

(

Toe

:

Fre:

Res

pons

ibili

tks.

Indi

cate

the

perc

enta

ge fc

r ea

ch r

espo

nsib

ility

, with

the

tota

l equ

alin

g 10

0% ir

resp

ectiv

e of

FIE

.

% M

anag

emen

t

% C

leric

al S

uppo

d

%U

ser

Ser

vice

s/M

arke

ting

% T

rain

ing

%In

form

atio

n D

evel

opm

ent

8, S

oftw

are

Dev

elop

men

t

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

9

77

Nam

e:T

itle:

Pho

ne:

(

Res

pons

ibili

ties.

Indi

cate

the

perc

enta

ge fo

r ea

ch r

espo

nsib

ility

, with

the

tota

l equ

alin

g 10

0% ir

resp

ectiv

e of

FT

E.

% M

anag

emen

t

% C

leric

al S

uppo

d

% U

ser

Sav

ices

iMar

ketin

g

% T

rain

ing

% In

form

atio

n D

evel

opm

ent

% S

oftw

are

Dev

elop

men

t

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

Nam

e:T

itle:

Pho

ne:

(

Res

pons

ibili

ties.

Indi

cate

thc

perc

enta

ge fo

r ea

ch r

espo

nsib

ility

, with

the

tota

l equ

alin

g 10

0% ir

resp

ectiv

e of

FIE

.

% M

anag

emen

t

% C

leric

al S

uppo

rt

% U

ser

Ser

vice

s; M

arke

ting

% T

rain

ing

% In

form

atio

n D

evel

opm

ent

% S

oftw

are

Do

elop

me

nt

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

X N

ame:

Pho

ne:

()

FT

E.:

Rts

pons

ibili

ties.

Indi

cate

the

cem

ent:m

e fo

r ea

ch r

espo

nsib

ility

, with

the

tota

l equ

alin

g 10

0% ir

resp

ectiv

e of

FfE

.

Mm

agem

ent

% C

leric

al S

uppo

rt

% U

ser

Sav

ices

/Mar

keto

g

% T

rain

ing

% In

form

atio

n D

evel

opm

ent

% S

oftw

are

Dev

elop

men

t

_% O

ther

(id

entif

y)%

Oth

er (

iden

tify) 78

10

Nev

em

(F

TE

:

Res

poos

ibili

ties.

Indi

cate

the

perc

enta

ge fo

r ea

ch r

espo

nsib

ility

, with

the

tota

l equ

alin

g 10

0% ir

resp

ectiv

e of

FIE

.

Man

agem

ent

Cle

sica

l Sup

port

Use

r S

ervi

ces/

Mar

ketin

g

Tra

inin

g%

Info

rmat

ion

Dev

elop

men

t

Sof

twar

e D

evel

opm

ent

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

Nam

e:T

itle:

Pho

ne:

(fl'

E:

Res

pons

ibili

ties.

Indi

cate

the

perc

enta

ge fo

r ea

ch r

espo

nsib

ility

, with

the

tota

l equ

alin

g 10

0% ir

resp

ectiv

e of

FIE

.

Man

agem

ent

Cle

rical

Sup

port

% U

ser

S e

tvic

es/M

arke

ting

Tra

inin

g%

Info

rmat

ion

Dev

elop

men

t

% S

oftw

are

Dev

elop

men

t

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

Nam

e:

Pho

ne:

(F

TE

:

Res

pons

ibili

ties.

Indi

cate

the

perc

enta

ge fo

r ea

ch r

espo

nsib

ility

, with

the

tota

l equ

alin

g 10

0% ir

resp

ectiv

e of

FIE

.

% M

anag

emen

t%

Cle

rical

Sup

port

% U

ser

Ser

vice

s/M

arke

ting

% T

rain

ing

% In

form

atio

n D

evel

opm

ent

% S

oftw

are

Dev

elop

men

t

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

11

79

Nam

e:T

itle:

Pho

ne:

(F

TE

:

Res

pons

ibili

ties.

Indi

cate

the

perc

enta

ge fo

r ea

ch r

espo

nsib

ilky.

with

the

tota

l equ

alin

g M

I% ir

resp

ectiv

e of

FT

E.

Man

agem

ent

% C

leric

al S

uppo

rt

% U

ser

Ser

vice

s/M

arke

ting

% T

rain

ing

% in

form

atio

n D

evel

opm

ent

%S

oftw

are

Dev

elop

men

t%

Oth

er (

iden

tify)

% O

ther

(id

entif

y)

D. T

YPE

OF

OD

S

Circ

le th

e le

uer

for

one

optio

n:

aA

sys

tem

obt

aine

d. p

urch

ased

. or

leas

ed fr

om s

ome

othe

r en

tity

(suc

h 25

a s

oftw

are

deve

lope

r), w

ithC

IDS

sta

ff pr

imar

ily

resp

onsi

ble

for

user

ser

vice

s an

d in

form

atio

n de

velo

pmen

t.

bA

sys

tem

dev

elop

ed w

ithin

a s

tate

or

mun

icip

ality

with

sta

ff re

spon

sibl

e fo

r co

mpu

ter

prog

ram

min

g, u

ser

serv

ices

, and

info

rnta

tion

deve

lopm

ent

Add

ition

al C

omm

ents

:

12

BE

ST C

iinL

1L81