DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 293 616 PS 016 010

AUTHOR Hildebrand, Joan M.TITLE Maryland Day Care Voucher System.INSTITUTION Maryland State Dept. of Human Resources,

Baltimore.SPONS AGENCY Administration for Children, Youth, and Families

(DHHS), Washington, D.C.PUB DATE Mar 84CONTRACT OHDS/ACYF-90-PD-86511/01NOTE 58p.; For related documents, see ED 245 844, ED 262

861, and ED 267 897. Some of the figures may bemarginally legible.

PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Computers; Computer Software; *Day Care;

Demonstration Programs; *Educational Vouchers;*Information Services; *Information Systems;*Management Systems; Program Development;*Referral

IDENTIFIERS *Maryland Day Care Voucher Program

ABSTRACTThis manual was written to assist States and other

governmental units wishing to replicate the Maryland Day Care VoucherProgram, a system of providing child care subsidies to eligiblefamilies. Chapter I provides brief histories of day care in Marylandand that State's grant to demonstrate the viability of a day carevoucher system. Chapter II defines what a voucher is and entails, anddescribes purposes of a voucher, components of the voucher system,and several related administrative procedures. Figures included inthe text present elements of the Voucher Project as implemented bythe departments of social services in Anne Arundel and WashingtonCounties, Maryland. Chapters III and IV list, respectively, goals andcomponents of (1) the information and referral system developed inthe two pilot counties and (2) the management information systemimplemented to provide automated information processing andrecord-keeping for the Day Care Voucher Demonstration. Hardware andsoftware components provided to the counties are indicated. ChapterIV also discusses the development of automated files and their majordata fields and the design of data entry screens. Figures providesamples of child and provider files, reproduce data entry screens,and delineate reporting formats developed to assist in day-to-dayoperations of the voucher system and in meeting federal and statereporting requirements. (RH)

************************************************************************ Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made *

* 'rom the original document. **************** *******************************************************

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and Improvement

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)

This document h$s been reproduced asecerved from the person or organization

originating itO Minor changes have been made to improve

reproduction quality

Pants of vrew or °gni on s sts ted in this docu-ment do not necessarily represent official0E141 position or policy

MARYLAND

DAY CARE

VOUCHER SYSTEM

Joan M. Hildebrand, Ph.D.

MARCH, 1984

Prepared Under Contract To:

Department of Health and Human ServicesContract # OHDS/ACYF

Grant # 90-PD-86511/01

Maryland State Department of Human Resources

2

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

history of Grant

Maryland has considered a voucher system of providing

services for some time. Some experimentation has occurred

with use of vouchers to purchase in-home aide service from

frienas, neighbors or other individuals for the elderly. In

the Day Care Division, efforts have been made to de-regulate

ana simplify the program. Contracts with providers had been

reducea from an unweidly package of legalese to a more man-

ageable agreement of one page.

Licensure of family day care homes became registration

with more practical requirements. The program focus, however,

remained on the relationship of the agency and the provider.

Any meaningful arrangement between the provider and the family

using day care was almost incidental.

In October, 1982, Maryland received a grant from, the

Department of human Development Services, to demonstrate

the viability of a day care voucher system. The project was

tested in two areas, Anne Arundel and Washington Counties.

2

Anne Arundel is a metropolitan county with a popula-

tion of 370,773. It is the site of Annapolis, the State

capitol; it has much recreational industry along its

many shore lines and rural areas dotted with farms and

small communities. It has a well developed day care pro-

gram administered by the local department of social ser-

vices.

Washington is a rural county in the mountains of

Western Maryland with a population of 113,084. There are

a number of heavy industries, mining and manufacturing,

which have suffered through the economy as manifested in

one of the highest unemployment rates in the States, Re-

covery is apparent, however, and people are being slowly

recalled to work. Washington County was one of the recip-

ients of the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) funds

ana day care was administered with them through the Depart-

ment of Education. As those funds are being phased out,

the shifting to the local department of social services and

is growing rapidly. There has been an increase in the de-

partment of social services program of over 400% since the

beginning the voucher demonstration.

The System is made up of three major pieces - the

voucher, an information and referral system (I & R) and an

automated management system. The grant has allowed for the

4

3

employment of a State director and secretary and three (3)

staff in each of the county sites. They include a Voucher

System Manager for overall coordination, and I&R Specialist

for the automation aspects of the project and a secretary.

In addition, two consultants with prior experience in

their areas have been used. One has worked on the I&R sys-

tem while the other has assisted with the management system

ana evaluation of the project.

Procedures for implementation were developed by the

Voucher staff and by a Planning Committee with representa-

tion from the department of social services of the two test

counties, the State Social Services Administration and. she

Maryland Committee for Children, Inc. (MCC), a private non-

profit advocacy agency which is the I&R contractor.

Day Care In Maryland

Historically, the State of Maryland has been inter-

ested in the development of quality day care for children

in the State. As far back as 1962, the State General Assem-

bly established a Governor's Commission to study the need

for tray care.

5

4

In July, 1967, funds were made available for estab-

lishing a purchase of care program along with developing

state-operated day care centers in areas where the private

sector did not already have centers. By 1980, the State of

Maryland was operating 26 pre-school day care centers for

1,531 children with 341 classified public employees at a

cost of $5.5 million and 7 school age programs for 414

children with 67 clasWied employees at a cost of $1.2

million, for a cost of approximately $3,444 per child per

year.

At the same time, the state purchased child day care

from private centers and from family day care providers at

maximum rates established in the state budget. The purchase

program co.,t the state $8.3 million for 4,982 places pur-

chased or a cost of $1,665 per child per year.

A comparison study of the cost to the state between

state operated and purchase of private day care showed that

the state operated program cost Maryland almost twice the

amount of the state's rate for purchasing care. The low

cost of purchasing care was caused by the lower salaries

and operating costs of private care while the state was

required to pay classified level salaries, high rents and

transportation costs.

6

5

In 1980, the state Social Services Administration began

to plan a more cost efficient but equally effective use of

public funds for day care services. In 1981, the state

General Assembly requested and approved a plan for the

close-out of the state operated day care programs and the

conversion to total purchase of care from private providers.

Simultaneously, the Social Services Block Grant re-

duced the state's day care budget by $2.5 million. It

became clear that the state operated day care center pro-

gram could be cashed out to absorb the loss of federal

.unds and yet continue to provide care for the 1,531 pre-

school children and 414 school age children by purchasing

care at the lower cost of private care.

By August, 1982, the state operated programs were

closed out, 30 of the 33 transferred to private operators,

and the funds remaining after the federal reduction con-

verted to purchase of care at the state's maximum rates.

At the same time the Governor allowed an increase of $1.25

million for purchase of day care in the 1982 state fiscal

year budget (July 1982 through June, 1983). The impact

on the purchase of day car' program was dramatic. Between

the state's fiscal year 1981 and 1983, the purchase of the

day care program increased 57% from $8.3 million.

6

Social Services Administration, with the knowledge

that funds for purchase of care would probably not be in-

creased in the next few years, sought ways to increase the

capacity by initiating the Day Care Voucher Project pilot

study.

Objectives of Voucher Project

The Day Care Voucher Project established these object-

ives for the pilot study:

1. To establish better fiscal control over funds to

local jurisdictions.

2. To provide more parental responsibility for the

choice of type and location of day care for their

child.

3. To demonstrate that the quality of the day care

program increases as selection and oversight of

care shifts from local department staff to par-

ents.

4. To demonstrate that the pilot project can be ex-

panded state -wide,

7

5. To develop a model voucher system for other

states.

6. To reduce administrative delays for the client

and allow the worker to spend more time assist -

lug client.

7. To impact favorably on employment stability of

the parent.

8. To establish an information and referral service

linked to the voucher system.

9. To facilitate and increase participation of pub-

licly funded private daycare providers in the

program.

Purpose of This Manual

This manual is written to assist those states wishing

to replicate the Maryland Day Care Voucher Program. It will

also be helpful to those Maryland counties who will be insti-

tuting the Day Care Voucher Program.

This Manual can be helpful to those people and agencies

who would like to institute a Voucher Program in other ser-

a

8

vices. It is particularly adaptable to in-home services,

homemaker services and health-related services.

10

CHAPTER II

VOUCHER

Definition

A voucher is an agreement among the three parties in-

volved in subsidized day care - the parent, the provider

and the local department of social services. When completed,

the following commitments have been made.

The child's parent agrees:

If a fee is assessed, to make payment to the

provider on the provider's schedule and for

the times and amount specified on the voucher,

subject to the terms and conditions on the re-

verse side of the voucher.

To make an alternate care plan when the child is

ill.

To notify Provider when the child will be absent.

To report to the department of social services

within 10 days any changes in income, employment,

family group, marital status, address, phone number,

and/or change in times which day care is required.

The Provider agrees:

To provide day care for the child as specified on

the voucher.

10

To maintain legal licensure or registration to

make available pertinent records for inspection

by the department of social services.

To establish a system for presentation of grie-

vances related to the operation of the program.

To provide services to subsidized children in

accordance with Titles VI and VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964.

Not to disclose information concerning a service

recipient for any purpose not directly related to

the service, except with written approval of the

Parent.

To abide by decisions made pursuant to fair hear-

ing procedures.

The local department of social services agrees:

To make payment for the subsidized child, upon

receipt of an authorized invoice from the Pro-

vider, for the times and amount specified on the

voucher, subject to the terms and conditions on

the reverse.

To make available fair hearing procedures to

applicants or recipients aggrieved by decisions

of the Department or the Provider and to advise

applicants of such procedures.

12

11

Not to disclose information concerning a recipient

for any purpose not directly related to the ser-

-im except with written approval of the Parent.

Purposes

The purposes of the voucher are:

To provide choice and satisfaction to Parents by

using subsidized day care.

To enable Parents to secure day care in a timely

manner.

To assist Providers in maintaining enrollment

which includes subsidized children.

To maintain quality of care for subsidized child-

ren.

Components

The components of the voucher system are:

The intake process including application, deter-

mination of need and eligibility and development

of a service plan.

Issuance of voucher including determination of

subsidy and completion of Voucher Sections I

through IV.

13

12

Child placemebt including selection of Provider,

completion of Voucher Sections V through VII and

receipt of voucher by the LDSS.

Payment of subsidy including issuance of invoices

to the Provider, submission of monthly invoices

by the Provider and payment process.

Continuing service including amendment of vouchers,

as needed, periodic redetermination of need and

eligibility and termination, as appropriate.

Procedures

A. Intake

1. Application

The applicant who wishes to use day care for

a child meets with the intake worker. After

establishing that d4., care is an appropriate

plan to meet the needs of the child and fam-

ily, the worker and applicant complete the

data elements on the DHR/SSA 248, 248A, 248B

(See Appendix) and they are signed by each,

as appropriate.

Instructions for completing DHR/SSA 248.

14

13

2. Determination of Eligibility

The following families are eligible for

subsidized day care services:

Recipients of AFDC

Recipients of SSI or Mandatory State

Supplements (MSS) or Public Assis-

tance to Adult Families whose month-

ly gross income does not exceed 80%

cf the State's median income.

3. Determination of Needs

An applicant is eligible by need for sub-

sidized day care if there is no adult mem-

ber of the family available or willing to

care for the child, no other acceptable

care plan can be arranged and if the family

meets one of the established priority cri-

teria.

Provision of day care is subject to the

following order of pricrity:

(1) Prevention of out-of-home placement

and reunification of family or rela-

tive, such as protective services

participants and children at ,isk of

institutionalization;

15

14

(2) AFDC, SSI, MSS, or PAA recipients

and income eligible participants with

income less than 40 percent of the

State's median income, full-time work-

ing;

(3) AFDC, SSI, MSS, or PAA recipients

and income eligible participants with

income less than 40 percent of the

State's median income, completing

.high school;

(4) Income eligible participants, working

full-time, with income in the follow-

ing order:

(a) 40 to 49 percent of the State's

median income,

(b) 50 to 59 percent of the State's

median income,

(c) 60 to 69 percent of the State's

median income,

(d) 70 to 80 percent of the State's

median income;

(5) Income eligible participants with

income of 40 to 80 percent of the

State's median income, completing

high school;

(6) AFDC, SSI, MSS, or PAA recipients

and income eligible participants

16

15

with income less than 40 percent of

the State's median income, full-time

undergraduate college or vocational

training;

(7) Income eligible participants with

income of 40 to 80 percent of the

State's median income full-time un-

dergraduate college or vocational

training;

(8) AIDC, SSI, MSS, or PAA recipients

and income eligible participants with

income less than 40 percent of the

State's median income, part-time

working.

(9) AFDC, SSI, MSS, or PAA recipients

eligible participants with income

less than 40 percent of the State's

median income, part-time completing

high school.

(10) Income eligible participants with in-

come of 40 to 80 percent of the State's

median income, part-time working;

(11) AFDC, SSI, MAA, or PAA recipients and

income eligible participants with in-

come less than 40 percent of the

State's median income, part-time un-

16

dergraduate college or vocational

training;

(12) Income eligible participants with

income of 40 to 80 percent of the

State's median income, part-time

undergraduate college or vocational

training.

When the program is fully subscribed and

a slot becomes available, the child of the

family with the highest priority is placed

first.

When the program is reduced because of in-

sufficient funds or is oversubscribed, the

priorities are applied in reverse for term-

inating services.

When the program is full and an application

is made for protective service purposes,

the child must be placed. If there is not

sufficient attrition within 30 days to pre-

vent oversubscription, another child of

lowest priority must be terminated.

4. Service Plan

Development of the service plan includes

Identification of service options, advan-

18

17

tages and disadvantages and client's choice

of services.

Identification of possible barriers to de-

livery of the service.

B. Issuance of Voucher

1. Workers determine amount of voucher subsidy by

use of eligibility information above.

2. Worker gives client a voucher:

Good for six (6) months, beginning with

intake date.

C. Placement

1. If a client has not already selected a day care

placement, she is referred to Information and

Referral.

given pamphlets on selecting appropriate

day care.

given a list of names of providers in

appropriate geographic areas.

19

18

2. Client takes list and voucher and goes "shop-

ping".

D. Placement

1. Client and provider negotiate amount to be paid

over subsidy:

only restriction: provider may not charge

more than charged to highest paying custo-

mer.

2. Appropriate sections of voucher are signed by

both client and provider:

Provider sends voucher to worker.

E. Subsidy Payment

1. Worker sends invoices to provider.

2. Provider sends completed invoice to agency

monthly.

3. Agency sends check to provider.

20

19

F. Continuing Services

1. Client applies for reconsideration each six

months or when there is a change in service:

salary change

change in the hours of day care needed.

2. Subsidy is terminated when"

service is no longer nedded

client's earnings are over 90% of the

State's median income.

The following figures explain the Voucher Project as im-

plemented by Anne Arundel and Washington Counties Depart-

ments of Social Services. Figure 1 is a flow chart of

the Purchase of Day Care System as it was in the local

departments before the initiation of the Voucher Project.

Figure 2 is a flow chart of the Voucher system in the two

counties. Figure 3 is a logic model of the Voucher Pro-

ject.

21

Draft Model of the Purchase of Day Care System

Eligibilitydetermined onbasis of financialneed i service

criteria

Client com-pletes application,worker determinessubsidy and parent

foe

Client givenpriority ratingand placed on awaiting list (if

necessary)

Worker makesattempt to placeclient with ident-

ified provider

Using a pro-vider I i R listing,day care worker ident-ifies appropriate care(i.e., type of care,

location, etc.

DSSpays providerauthorised sub-sidy for client

Client paysadditional fee(if required)directly to the

provider

Client con-

/ tact local! DES for day\ cars services

....

Vas c111\identified

(.provider

Item 2

Draft Model. of the Day Care Voucher System Process

/Eligibilitydetermined onbasis of fin-

\amcial need 6sorwlma criteria.

..,

- ----

,--0

...----,

Client //Client re-

f referred ceives I E R

1 to I 6 R information

Alli

Provider DES pa31;4>\submits -vider author-monthly feed subsidyinvoices

\for client

\ to DSS ,

Client coo-

Eligible plates appli-

for f cation, worker

service? Pis determines sub-

\ sidy 6 abilityo[ DES to fundlot

.----___

Client is 42liontreceivesreferred to information fr

----

I 6 16 if I 6 It service

necessary

- --

Client re- ,

waives voucher

imeount specified/

with subsidyI

mod

Client selects Client and pro-

providers eider complete

presentsvoucher

voucher, mill**go to 068, clienta....1dprovidt:,,,

/Local OBS workersends invoices

.--- ----...

Eligibilityredeterminedafter sixmonths

2 4

INPUTS--

..§7AFTING-State:

project mgrsclericalworker;

systemconsultant,:oversightstaff-Local:

project mgr;I s R spe-cialist:

clericalworker

NICRO-

CONPUTUR

FUNDING

.tee 1

Draft Logic Model of the Day Care Voucher Demonstration

STATE LEVEL Acrilarres

A. START -UP

-collaborate. withdemonstratioa o. stiesto develop c,erationalplan and progeduree forvoucher deqopetration(including fending)-supports technicaldesign and implement-ation for MR-supports technicaldesign and implement-ation of I i It system

-monitors tort -upof voucher demonstrationat demonstration countyagencies

S. CONTINUING Of:MATIONS-provides technicalsupport an4muidanceto improveoperationaie fficiency

-provides qv:weightand monitoriag ofactivities endresults of thevoucher destonstration

2 5

PROCESS

COUNTY LEVEL ACTIVITIES

A. START -UP

-collaborates withstate and other demonstra-tion counties to developoperational plan and pro-cedures for voucherdemonstration (includingforms)

-notifies clients, providersand organisations involvedin day care of the changefrom the purchase of careto the Vbucher System-changes existing day carecases to the Voucher System-assists in the design andinstallation of the MIS-implements the I i It System:institutes revised proce-dures for client management,provider management andclaims reimbursement-institutes revised externalreporting procedures

B. CONTINUING OPERATIONS-maintains end operates Isystems provide clients withinformation and assistanceto identify/choose appropriateday care providers

-performs revised proceduresfor: client management; pro-vider management; and claimsreimbursement

-maintains and operates NIS

CLIENT LEVEL ACTIVITIES

-client uses I i R ser-vices to identifyappropriate day careprovider-client makes arrange-ment for services andcompletes voucher withprovider-client monitors qualityof services received

PROVIDER LEVELACTIVITIES

-provider com-pletes voucherwith client andsends it to DES

-provider submitsmonthly invoiceto MS for re-imbursement ofservices render-ed

OUTCOMES

INTERMEDIATEOUTCOMES

A. EFFICIENCY

-reduced time spentby agency staffproviders on paper-work and other ad-ministrativerequirements-quicker placementof children in daycare-better correspon-dence between pro-jected and actualexpenditures forday care

. EFFECTIVENNSS

-increased localagency staff timeavailable for clientand provider manage-ment-increased role ofclients in selectingproviders i monitor-ing day care quality

-increased availabil-ity of day careproviders/improvedchoice of care forclients-improved quality ofday care-increased employmentstability among

clients

26

CHAPTER III

INFORMATION AND REFERRAL SYSTEM

In order to implement an efficient and effective voucher

system in which the "shopping" for day care is done by the

parent, an information TA referral system needs to be estab-

lished. The information regarding providers may also be avail-

able to private users, as well as those subsidized by the local

denartments of social services. Enough knowledge about providers

must be available to enable users to make an informed decision

regarding the best program for their children.

Goals

The goals of the information and referral system are as

follows:

Reduction of time between a request for day care and

the securing of a placement.

Increased decision-making and satisfaction by parents

in selection.

Fuller and appropriate enrollment in day care programs.

More efficient use of local department of social ser-

vices day care staff with increased time for counseling

and monitoring.

Higher quality of day care due to parental involvement

and competition among providers.

24

Components

The Maryland Social Services Administration contracted with

a subcontractor to develop the information and referral system

In tut pilot counties. The subcontractor was responsible for ob-

taining the microcomputers to be used in the pilot study.

The subcontractor was responsible for:

Developing data elements on providers which would be

available to enable parents to make an initial decision

to investigate a provider further.

Determining the hardware and software components to best

meet the needs of the system.

Purchasing hardware, software for installation in the two

local departments.

Programming the information and referral system in the

two local departments.

Training local department of social services staff in

the operation of the system.

Assisting with input and output documents to create and

update the resource file.

Assisting with information to providers and users for

recruitment and appropriate use of the system.

The subcontractor provided a technical assistant for this

project. This person, along with other staff from the subcontractor,

28

25

provided training in the use of the computer for information and

referral ana for counseling parents and choosing the appropriate

day care.

The subcontractor compiled the list of providers on discs

by regions as well as several other indicators (infant, handi-

capped, hours of service, etc.). A parent was provided with

a printout list of providers that matched their requirements.

The parent was also giver a pamphlet explaining how to look for

a quality day care program.

The parent could then use the printout, with the assistance

of the pamphlet, and go "shopping" for day care. A copy of the

pamphlet and a sample printout are included with this Chapter.

29

CHAPTER IV

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

The management information system provides automated infor-

mation processing and record-keeping for the Day Care Voucher

Demonstration. Using an inexpensive microcomputer, along with

flexible data base management software, each demonstration county

developed a child and day care provider based MIS. This system

was designed to integrate fully into tbe day-to-day operations of

each local agency. Maryland Social Services Administration hired

a subcontractor to implement the management information system.

Obi ect ives

The following are the objectives of the management information

system:

Facilitate processing and tracking of day care appli-

cants through placement into day care;

Provide readily accessible, up-to-date information about

children receiving day care, as well as the providers of

day care;

a Assist in the monthly processing of invoices from provi-

ders - including the auditing of children in care and the

automatic calculating of payment to providers;

Assist day care workers in providing detailed information

about day care providers in various locations throughout

the community, as well as to effectively manage their

provider caseloads; and

27

Facilitate the generation of statistical reports to

meet federal and state reporting requirements and to

manage day care resources.

A microcomputer, with keyboard, video display terminal, and

dox matrix printer, was used by each demonstration county to set

up the MIS. Washington County, with a caseload of about 100

children receiving day care, used a two disk drive system for

storage of data. Anne Arundel County, with a caseload of about

600 children receiving day care, used a 10 megabyte hard disk

storage syster. The software equipment selected for development

of the MIS was DB Master with utility packs and statistical

package, a flexible data base management software. In addition,

the local agencies purchased spread sheet type software and word-

processing software to assist in other voucher-related operations.

The following chart shows the hardware and software compo-

nents for the counties:

(See Page 28)

31

28

HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE

COMPONENTS

COUNTIES

EquipmentWashington Anne Arundel

2 Bell & Howell II+Microcomputer Systems, X X

Professiona Model, #304BD (with 48K)

2 Disk Drive, with controller cards #078469 X X

2 'Disk Drive, without ccutroIlerrAwas4O73413 X X

2 Desktop Microstands #MS001 X X

2 Amdeck 12" Green Phosphor Monitors #300G X X

2 Computer to Monitor Cables (BNC-RCA) X X

2 Okidata 84P High Speed Printers X X

2 Printer interface cards with cable X X

2, Floor model printer stands X X

2 Videx 80 Column Cards w/Switch X X

2 Z-80 Soft Card w/CPM X X

2 16K Ram Cards X X

1 Serial Card & Cable X

1 12 MGB Corvus Hard Disk w/Mirror X

2 Videx Apple Writer Pre-Boot X X

2 Apple Writer II Word Processor X X

2 Data Reporter (hard and soft disk versions) X X

2 Super Calc II (hard and soft disk versions) X X

2 Delivery, Installation, Warranty X X

1 DB Master Floppy Disk SystemX

1 DB Master Utility Pak #1X

1 DB Master Hard Disk System X

1 DB Master Utility Pak #2 X

1 DB Master Stat Pak X

32

29

Major Files and Data Entry Screens

After thorough examination of the manual filing system, day-

t. -day information processing, and report requirements, the local

agancias .decided. Apt= ZWD major automated files:

(1) A child file, which would have detailed information about

each chi ?d that applies, receives a voucher, and/or is

placed in day care; and

(2) A provider file, which would have detailed information

about each day care provider licensed/registered by

the local agency - including day care centers and

family providers.

Each local agency went through a detailed and systematic

process of identifying fields or major characteristics that would

appear within each file. An example of the major fields selected

by one of the counties can be found at the end of the Chapter on

Figure 1.

After determining the major fields within each of the two

files, the local agencies designed data entry screens. To the

extent possible, these screens were set up so that they would

locate information items within child and provider records.

Separate screens were set up for each file. Figure 2 at the

end of this Chapter provides an example of the child file and

33

30

Figure 3 provides an example of the provider files.

Procedures

Once the data entry screens were designed, a small sample of

cases was loaded into each file. This data was used to:

test the efficiency of data entry procedures,

develop coding for some of the fields,

assist in the development of reports for the system.

Once these small-scale tests were completed and the ability

to generate necessary reports was demonstrated, the local agency

staff used information from manual files (e.g., the voucher appli-

cation) to load records into the Child and Provider files.

As records were added to the system, agency supervisory staff

monitored data entry and was involved in quality control of the

data bases. This ensured accuracy and consistency of data within

each file. Figure 4, at the end of this Chapter shows a completed

sample of child's file while Figure 5 shows a sample of a completed

provider file.

Development and Generation of Reports

While local agency staff in each demonstration county worked

on initial data entry, they also designed and developed report

3(4

31

formats for the MIS. After consultation with supervisors and day

care workers, reports were designed which would assist in the

day-to-day operations of the voucher system and meet federal and

state reporting requirements. Some of the reports that were de-

veloped appear in the following Figures at the end of this Chapter:

Figure 6 - Voucher Log I and II

This report enables the local agency to track vouchers, as well

as the progress that clients make toward finding day care. It

also gives details about children participating in the voucher

program. It is sorted by voucher number.

Figure 7 - Waiting List Report

This report enables the local agency to track children who have

applied for day care but are not yet receiving day care. It is

sorted first by priority code, then by application date.

Figure 8 - Voucher Expiration Report

This report enables the local agency to keep track of vouchers

that will expire during the upcoming six (6) weeks. It provides

the worker with information that will assist in making contact

with the client. Only the vouchers that expire during the next

six months are selected. The report is sorted by case name.

35

32

Figure 9 - Child Chacteristics Report

This report provides the agency workers with detpiled information

about all children that have been issued vouchers. It is sorted

by parent's name.

Figure 10 - Day Care Provider List

This report is a listing of day care facilities that can be dis-

tributed to families looking for day care. Both providers r4.-.1d

parents are given locator codes, that correspond to geograp"ical

areas within the county (e.g., within a specific school district).

Parents may ask for a listing of facilities within their area to

assist them in locating day care.

Figure 11 - Worker Information and Referral List

This report provides details about providers within given geogra-

phical area. It can be used by agency workers to assist clients

in finding day care. It provides considerable detail about the

type of care offered by providers.

Figure 12 - Fiscal Report

This report enables the agency to process monthly invoices. It

provides detail about the amount that should be paid to each pro-

vider, based on the invoice that is submitted. The computer auto-

matically calculates the payment (net total) due to each provider,

33

after the data entry clerk enters the day and hours in care during

the month for each child.

Figure 13 - Mailing Labels

Libele can be automatically produced from either the hilt or

provider files. They may be sorted by case name, provider name,

zip code, etc. In addition; a small group of cases of providers

:Day he selected and printed -- e.g., only those cases due for re-

consideration during the upcoming month.

37

0

smentssigmfmteista4-air

Figure 1

CH

AR

AC

TE

RIS

TIC

S O

F FI

EL

DS

WIT

HIN

TH

EC

HIL

D F

ILE

UOf

MgIS Witt tt

If !I gssa4smc EP

fl R00.17.A4 IA 40

P.

Ti

1III 99I

..

Pp

a .

55.55

85.58

55.55

55

85

55

//0

56 56555 55

U. 55555 gg

gg 55555 AA

PV 0111 11

assn

min

55

55

55

11mm

...P.

4PaP

W^M

MIV

4=14

UV X

3* XS

Je!

r<4

IF,rv.

r..cgm

5,65 6.o5

55 55. 55 55

U. 55 55 65

31 11 13

AgI

nanm

t;434

1:14

SVV

:sts

m=

ls2:

4224

*C4I

MS!

55

AS

55 11

PP

11.1

0M

.4

.4;

14"A 4

RM68

55 fig

Ai

56 55 At

56 58 At

PV14

my.

04 Ir.

55 58 55 11

PP

1I

lw 6 I

g6 61

55 65

56 fig

1

PP11

VI

No&

Figure 1 (Continued)

Dff

iRA

CT

ER

IST

ICS

OF

FIE

LD

S

WIT

HIN

TIE

PR

OV

IDO

t FIL

E

-44,74a-m«unzmxmomaAnnAmmr.OnJ7413Mmosr.Wasdt2WitzmuSettenftgEgg*O!*-0

CV it :tit &V nu vt

itiCt 3Tit

ifil VIA 11

24.

..

1.

a5..1

;0

44 4O

14 4

i 4 4 44 4

U. 58 55688 gg gg gg gg g

g gg gg ggSgg gg gg gg'gg

g gg gg ggggg gg gg gg gz

1111 11

00 Oft 44444 44 44 irk

co

=L

I=

00 gg

gg g VP

4

0.===ss

oo gg

gg

gg

PFP D

..1111

MM

0040(1.1400

I;;

smins nn.g: ns

epi.....

is;A

IVA» 0,

<4

:g

A88 .88.88

00 .60' gg gi

U

88 .88 08.A8 gg

14

It

FP PE P

mm 11 li

ww cup

SIN mm

V 2 4

a:

,.. ab. aro ...-111. 4.

L3--- e Ft- --**2-------1 CASE *2

DATA ENTRY SCREENS.

Tit CHILD FILE ICHILD F-21.....E

a;ADD REES c1C-VT'

:114CIPPIPIE

1 1 3

:

26 CHILD MAME'

UP'DATM1--STATUE s Nom

OM a.

...a

4111111.S1 11 i 1410 AN< t.

ClILD NAM Es=NM 01=1

STATE: MEND r

MM1116 OMNI.

....a1SCH DIET'HRMsDAVOsREM LOCc

OTHER DIST 2s-IR

mown. 1.

1=6RIORITV ,1

51111

(20

(3.32:

13 4

:13

127.....=21W119.'12

SEX $

RECOM MEM

HRIY sua1 IMOD

RACE:--WO Ft PE

I NUNN.

AP01=q DT s.0.

MOM, IMIN4111 as

11111. a4611

HRL-V SUEC:---Dt-VELIEg--=C

WKL.V SUE1-02ISSUE DT

4.1 R Err z7

.=

Rm-g- int DT &L..143

.01

;1% .1

.P40. a.

S UW1=0 Dr sS molim amlben

IMI111 1 ammo mow.

PLCE. r:-rTERM DT s

%mow 1MINN. aail

MM.ow.

ea MIND

a. e a 111, a 40

Figure 2

NTA ENTRY SCREENS,

Tie *Wm Flu

?-7 'CI-OILD NAME'=LTT 4I ISTATE- DLL a

-Cil-11=GMTV'T 1-117/1.411es "Ps T /OILY =

:71 TOTAL- HRL-Vit **IMO TOTAL- DLYsIf 2:

lio MEG *a0.

HOURS/MO: DAYO/MOs

-,

AMMO

=IMI111

MM. 1of.

HRLY TOTAIs ***Mt** DLY TOTAL: ****UNIA03 MOT_It_MACW.441.1*4*-64Da4,40-4.-

MAlei4ENT: 4$*****

t".30

0-1

C4

(

MM.

=NM.

.m

IIMM1

. 41. Am. m ow. I a.

'11

Figure 2 (Continued)

IMM01101.. ..41-44.46- PPROVIDERFIL-E -0F44-06.

:REM* I uPogrra. . 01.

=, =1..Or MM/MM

.144P1ROV X DER SADDRESS STATE,:"t"-' M"PrY

=,4TO

:t7

*WORKER X1:Igem-Metrqst-L"--N"- =MM.

FeHONE a

REGIS=M-1)C PT1R-2- IINEW '''bMasi.

Male Mm.

,rs

s'

!sr.

1.1r. EVENINGS;4.

CAPAC I 'TY =, 1MM. 0 VACANCY

REFERRAL:sortvp rsay

!vs.:v

!tr.1' =

...MOM.

, 11

VOUCHER1=0CAIT'X'

HOURS e .......

1st

toJEEKEND= !EP

-reR ref--

I NIF-ANT HDC1:

4=. 1.

SCHOOL_._ =

.- PAFt-r- x fel --"-- -- E cs Frr. ;

f=el ........... -......... .--- .

a:14carvirrienill" I

rv.!,

.n..._.a. Lit t. . - ... .......... .. .........- . .......- - - -a gigs.: ....... .....- .... - .=

.". AUG s FEE' ft...

.1'S E g ........- .... ....................

MAR Sf :::

;::- - 0 C.'T X - -.. -... -.-.- -- AP, Ft -: ".s. NOV C MAY .

JUN r

FOOD PROM s MEALS I =.

: . 1, C COMM IM

....M. 4.0 .R 4..

MM.

I' RATEFT: RATEPiT MONO 0 4.1 =ENNIO MS& as M war.. 11. 1 a. al. =lb =1. al, ...M..

I l

f.

r

Moo

)TA ENTRY

na PROVIDER FILE

42Figure 3

1./1

es /I10/111!:#4

Isrl

HRS- FULL/PT- F REQ LOC- 2 PRIORITI-

CHILD NAME-DAYS- M-F

WE, JAMES SEX- M RACE- 18 ELIG CODE- 211WORKER ID- 143 RECON- 83 -11 -28 HRLY SUB -F- DLY

WKLY SUB-F- HRLY SUQ-C- 1,45 DLY_SUB-C...:_9..5

VWCHER M- 1008 UPDATE- 10-13-03 CASE 0- 121212121CASE NAME- DOE, JOHN ADDRESS- 123 MAINCITY- ANNAPOLJ S StaiEr_MDWORK- 301-23i-8008 CHILD NAME- DOE, JAMESHDCP- N SCI$ 01ST- 10130 OTHER DIST- HRS- 6:00-3s00

STATUS- 4STREET

61=265-f4080DOD- 78-0423

APPL OT - 6343-14 ISSUE DT- 63-03-14 START DT- 83-04-01EXPIR DT- 83-95 -22 RET41 DT- 63-04-01 PLACE DT- 03-04-01SUSP DT

STATE DLV- 9.5TOTAL DLY- 9.5PAYMENT MONTH- 10

DLY TOTAL- 190

STATE HRLY- 1.45TOTAL HRLY- 1,45REG M- .212HRLY TOTAL- 10.5PAYMENT- 283

PROVIDER- SALVATION ARMY DAY CA

UNADJ TOT - 204.5 (')JUST - -1.5

SAMPLE RECORDS,

TIE CHILD FILE

Figure 4

43

Na1/1

tit

yn

REGO 4000. UPDATE GS*--26e-50-1000

PROVIDER JOHNSON, JANET ADDRESS 130 NORTH ST.

CITY ANNAPOLIS STATE MD ZIP 12345 PHONE 301-265-3000

;c

CAPACITY 6 VACANCY Y REFERRAL Y VOUCHER Y SCH DIST 10130

LOCATION 2 EVENING V MRS 7:30-6:00 NAME JOHNSONUFEKENA YTERM

PART TIME V ESCORT Y FOOD PGM Y MEALS BLS

COMMENT JUL 125 AUG 124.25

SEP .9 , . NnV DEC JAN

FEB MAR-. APR MAY JUN

FISCAL YR NAME REG RATE FT------..

REG RA A IiDeRA-

HDC RATEPT

4:0

ONVIIIMAM

I

Satfac RECORDS,

TIE PROVIDER FILE

Figure 5

44

45

Figure 6

01-1913

VOUCH, C11.011 NAME 009 CASE NAVE

VOUCHER LC. I MOE

PRIOR ISSUE DT EMIR DT 61.1-F IINLY-C VIP RET11 DT

159 75-81-13 113-03-23 53-09-23 25 F

:65 60-11-27 43-43-9 03-61 29 .17 77-11-25 53-3-01 13-6-1 19 F

102 77-1-11 3-04-13 83-1-116 411 F

:114 52-13-011 -- 113-14-13 -03.111-01 --. F

155 79 -54 -29 3-3-81 83-7-111 411 F

196 79-11-7...

13-3-30 83-09-3 411 F

It02 -71-15-19 3-0319-54-1--12--4 -.0 0

203 79-04-89 53-3-22 03-9-22 411 F

214 71-16-07-------- _______.

3-3-8 83-11-1 411 F

-"206 711-02-1 -15-03-1111-53-8710 r-

215 79-111-02 13-04-41 13-9-1 42 F. .

03-114-12 3-110-25 9 43 F216 7-11-1217 79-7-16 -- -113-114-12-113-011-25 45 I--224 70 -2 -1 53-13-0 3-9-111 43 F

231 79-3-17 13-43-117 04-9-24 26 F

232 - 79-80-17 113-03-47--13"..eget

233 77 -Of-19 03-03-07 113-19-1 N F

234 70 -OS -OS 13-03-111 83-09-1 41 F

265 . 74-3-13 13-114-1e--13-111-22--` t--P------271 79-1111-

. .3-3-07 03-12-21 43 F

_......_

112-6-14 3-04-18 13-9-03 t F

79-07 -26- --VS.413-03-47--83-$41-97---k

214 71-01-13 83-03-07 3-07-24 45 F

301 77-06- :2 13-43-47 113-12-2 F

317 S I -112-410 03-03-04 - 13-9-21 - 31- F

. 4.

o11N.irs

At,

0

10/.:1111

46

Figure 6 (Con't)

Ill

, VOUDNS CHILD'S *DIE

09-19-82Cusr.E DT WILY -8T Di.v-8T HISLT-PA 01.7-4:11 WILY -TOT 18.740 PIO/1DM 11 NAME

vOtel:HE4 LOG 11 __ _ _ . ... a eI

6P

6

NIIIC

!a - -- 199 83-04-111- 0.79 5.111 IL OS-- --1700 0.79 6.r s

141NI 165 83-04-11i 0.119 5.81 11.00 5. N o. 09 5.10

IP 174 83-04-111 0.57 3.70 11. SO 4.60 0.57 O. taDe:

r.--162113-04-01 -1.45 --1.511 IL% ----0. 65 1.45 :1-7.111-

IN 63-N-01 I. 12 7.30 0.011 .1.011 11,12_ _e2 a

185 113-114-01 1.45 9.50 11. SO 11.1111 I. 45 9. MI 1

'It94

011

.. aais

1% 113-04-01 1.45 9.51 0.11 0.00-- 1.45 'lr-M

202 63-04-01 1.45 9.50 0.00 0.00 I 45 Siiii-- sle

Om

PO_

203 SI-04-01 1.45 9.50 0.110 11. Of 1.45 %NI161

Pl.or71 e t * 113-114-111 1. 45- -1. 50 -1. 80--- O.5 1.45 -DMA

206 03-04-01 0.79 5.20 11.011 4.35 IL 79 _9.A

^ 215 83-N-01 1.30 0.45 0.04 1.35 9.04

216

S. 00ri

1. MP ----D. 511-- 0. Of i .05 1.30 1. Id

m 217 1. 38 11.911 0.00 0.55 1.30 9. IA__Is. .. _ - -. --224 113-04-01 1.35 6.50 0.00 65 1.35 IL IS

36 --- 11S--1--;-errr--5: te ---1.4 V le 1.79 5711

st

.14 132 83-04-01 0.79 5.10 0.00 IL% 0.79 5.14ri. _ . .

233 63-04-01 1.45 9.50 11.60 0.04 1.45 9.611..,M ..... 1114 1304461 -1.45---951T-1:11-0.06-.5-011. rfis

I. 09 3.27 11.011 11. NI 1.09 34,-.. _ . _

is 271 83-04-01 1.30 6.50 11.011 1. ft 1.31 !.I*!.I*4,.411 2112 83-04.11 0.97 '6. 311 WW1- 3.15 --e. 97 Oa-71.4 212 83-04-01 fb. 45 2. 92 10. 00 11. 161 11. 45 _2$/1/;,e __. . . ... _so 210 83-04-01 1.43 9.51 O.% .111 1.45 9. tollso%I 301 I. 45 -11. 511--11.5110:1111 1.45 0.A

317 0.97 6.00 0.00 1.15 0.97 7. IS___ et.i

..a.

.I. ... ...-..-.... .. tO 1

as

47

w.

,sA

I!

Figure 7

%AO 14

11 Wi7Vv.11 **WA APL.01. 0.13%if

-----A1APP14-.P0

1011/.

It

IY

4, if MAO 4C 113-141.417

10000 14C 110111-07

1i------1RWM4rw+-040---411164004411p

100)1

sIf

.11101S 044:

01026 $4C

11.I7 4C -20-13

10044 141 0.1-14-1

Ar» 3443 11411

111O13 04X 16.11-10-63

V33n ----sNoo4-...-4114lei40wdINi-

10 MOMS IMO 13 -14-07X

1401 WeiPPG:

toll: to. o- ow. q-

P 03 -: -13 se-: X.aF 113."1 1

XP-41' tt 11714.1.041-7.1. LI4

C7-.01 try I---76-11111-1111

Ma*. ir

6111-06-234

Vi-OS-1

---41441111.441-

7111-417 -14

77 -11 -23

---41414.114.-

7111-10-.el

MOWS 04111 84-141379-115 27

W a 4441.4101.411--

laAl

4114. 11434 K 3 P0 -:41aa-ea-ss

48

II

044"P.41

lie

41

%II IS%I

" !droll dit.

10034 OS 1113 -IS -2111

XPOW011,,,--4116----0/-411644-

:VA..) VC 1114-11..1

:4144..41 06 03 10-19

wceo 07

SPA 0.1-;#..:.

I-07-14

7l- 116 -1.'.

79-116-12

71 -ea-aa--130-441 -31

10-14 -30

7 - I - . 4

$ 619

6

leit

Ioliso

4

L...

P

p

P 03611-F4 411.106-98

1 F ,

.

...

....

,

$ P

T

,'T.

,

7t7

---If 43-05-24 03-#4-01

113.-011..15

si1

49

co

M

Ott

4

a

III** J I I I

II

F

2/I hu t 412 ti.Ee "A Pr 4." -- ! I"' ntwl la .12 P. 211 4.1 13ow 2.1.%; aa. ea.1 d

!*1

es 6. al. a we. 4014

'a*Ili

.

011

4.4

11. J tI I

00 40." .4 A" 10 us

ti; it; 14.1A7 111. ; II fb 2147 "2 7dt. .. Ir. .4 dioS. .. . se .1=

.1) 34 r .es me ',ie..* ..rio:eser.:,-tc.1.;.:3.3.::-.1331 33333J3.1.3

11

a4

0

Figure 9, -sZ 3.c. ti : .. cf.re I Da..c:.1 3 e.epe:

11 447111

125. «apes

13111 arpau ram

. 4171 L11114

SUS 41114

san ampla

5.s 44$

553 aapt

535 up?4 5301 ups

. a 540 aim46/ 4spatI

I.P.

%.

It

A

....

I

52

:AA 51013

451 "VIisS3 :WS1154 31611

*sr. 2.0,1

I IA 3$$$I

1177 31$11

463 4W664 441141

MO 44117

115.4 444-7

66? 3401

671 4400

. 1 -IPS MANI- D -II PUTT IS S A. tot km .a sr al.: . a iga:Aka a

ovir 1r

711-1146 - III OS 63-43-11 III-113-121 ' 1 F 1611-Ve. 1 i

74-414-IS OS 0304-s6 14-1111-47 1 a

73-1Z-311 es 03.5a -13 et-u-s 7 1

711-:0-:7 ma 53-42 OS W - :1- as a .

n-a s -a. 064 43-034: III03-0: 1 A

75-.0-s7 464 53-01147 401-44 1 IV 4.4.

74-10-111 1411 53-113-417 44- es-es $ V 11641.061

74-44-47 4 13-1: -Al Iiia.-:* I A I. .: .1.44. I

40-06-0: II $3- 53-j,$ 06-4: I 03-111.e:

74-as-ts 5 t3 43-.16 1 -44-41 s s-or-as

534:-11, 11 03-03-34 CI st-t $

75 2-I5 4 12-13111 ti!- : v. 3 a .:3..4-11:

0:- 0,r47 NC 43 4,-13 4$-la- :. :5113-51 Na al- er-ia t%-ev-.1s : 63-.4.1. .:.

40-45-17 04 113-3-i-1 1111-$1- is I

83-0:.1 14 13-16-:4 62-14- S4 i = Li :441

51-034: s4 113-41-10 sa-05-24 I 43 irr:

75 -13 -11 :A 13 O6 -:11 14 it . . 13 44- t.

71-43-0. 14 53 41- s so 112-fm-z. I 1 :300 0: !

73-12-:11 $5 03.46.4 1$ St..:41 . s a: :1::743-4'r-. 544 *3 -45-54 113 - SI- Ill 2 r.

i1

75411-14 544 13-41-113 (I15 /V $ r7545-1 6%0 11.1-.4 im 41 e -I'. s 3. 4: r:

75-49-17 1.1 3.44-4* 1.4-C7 42 1 e' :' ::..1. i

$1-14-42 :4 alst-t. I%-03-a) 1 :

11-06-12 4 6 5 4.1 Oa $ s . ) 4 . .7: -

53

cn

Figure 10

A:6

obl

II

DAY CARE PROVIDER LIST

TIM Is A LISTIND OF NW CARE FACILITIES SOITHIN YOUR AMA s

-LSERES0114 ilmAPCIL411-1X11014040440

ANOVIDEIPS NAME TELEPHONE HOURS 'wawa AlktmER'so

4%7100-3830 r:n

1,

.410-540 VI. 9

SOS 5sAA YES ANW ."

- -lc -.:. -1: . _ - . .14

FOCT

6aS

LIMMION

W1MENNW------7--

SCHOOL DISTRICT

ANNAPOLIS DOWNTOWNANNAPEN.IS DM*6410111[11i Unas11e1r4

" M ISIWAFOL I INAII410404onsasix.to morose.

;14-10111111Pearlasiisfum

.1000111a010

8, it

use

I A1311

^La..36

Ma'

16.44

14

Iii11

as

ZIA%_to

SsNo%

54

14raldh.44

s 9G

- N awls 4

6

4

4

A 11,11V

S

A 51 V

V

A N V

A 111115 V

A I A 1131 M

1110353 111113N Op

V Med

A 2 A A 9-012 / 12 NM0151130514

1

A N A 1102-1. 01412 1111015530311

A c A A tc-11113 00412 111101511301114

Er

N v A 6-tL WPM 13101111131/0 ..0

A t A A S-115 EIVLS1 111101.5330511 4

N A A 016-014 ,L18 101015113.01

A A 11-1 1114111 1,12111113111/1 et

A I A 1105-511 111PL111 1010/11113914

4 yid

AIDA A 5-11111. NOE NN018113004

N

A A C5-411M ova mossusawm

la

A a A 111-11113 0,418 mmnsmosom

A A 9-0011 cuss oposomoo

.1

els

A A A 1100 55118 11111/1111351IN

A A On-On NL Is 11110101131111/1 I 111

MA MA 111 W/11 51111011 3110110 dit A113 essolos IAN 111011110

I111 al me 1 11351101

Sea a la

Figure 12

111--.1.' :413PFtem

111111-1"

045-110 11 Mat MI 1 DEA WA I DLY DAYS

TOTALSFOR.:I.

1.301.44

S.505.50

25it

40

T 0 T A a. S Fail -nit .

OTA..SFOT.es,

.17 1.. 311 22

-

1.31 S. 110

.t..":

111

1. JO O.ZW 35

-21

11. Tr 1. Ili

: 4fa 6 YOUCHEI

105 s 1411

3

111

a.

A - ---

10747la

Mill,

:alb poi

Irir---"--T111,-1n I 0 II A L II F311 'a 1.4.111:111.:11adl 11.

GRAND TOTALS

0_ -

L 11CPOIT314

I 101AIS TOTA-

IS. GO 232. I*20. 110 171.70

.55. 00 403. 70

0. I* 1311. GO

0. 00 1 M. 6:.

2S. 00 L'alS..1.5411

11

1.Ul.fter_41 di 101el..4"PI

0.N 232.011 -11.00 _ - 171.70

.00 - -trz.1.1

coo t 311. C.41

. U111

VII*46.PI

Ots

A. OA 'S

.:;.trat... ;14::

a,--.4...

0.Ill. OA :511/.11.2 -3...5 Ai

*01411

-14.4. OW- a-. - . . - 311

&az.** - 3. LS ..c.i.. 71. 11114.1-

0.00 0.110 1.0- ......:

J. I:. - _

1114

le41

0.« 4.13 0.Na

1. O.: It484;4,a4/.*

'W 3. 5.5

II03 --itb7.3:1F---"TIIK.. 3A *4...15 a

w

. am

au

411.

VIIA

dl 41

III.06a

IA14.4....W

101,..

nXO

1.9.

W

*II

W

-.........--...- 1-rW

ft

.4.13

.3

IA

si

1St

13.44

57 4.7 cc-,, l'.

BELLER I VE API: 121

ANNAPOLIS MD 21401

CROFTON PARKWAYCROFTON MD 21114

MELVIN AVEaN4TAPOLZS IIID 21401

MONTEREY AVEANNAPOLIS MD 21401

MONTEREY AVEANNAPOLIS MD 21401

MONTEREY AVE.ANNAPOLIS MD 21401

ANNAPOL I S MD 21401

BOWMAN CTANNAPOLIS MD 21401

CLEARWATER CTSEVERN MD 21144

BOWMAN CT.ANNAPOLIS MD 21401

- DAR HARBOR RD ''11:. ":*.:....PASADENA .1:: :APMD4-21122; 58