donportal.securespsites.com docu…  · web viewthe greater amarillo affiliate of susan g. komen...

64
Susan G. Komen for the Cure ® Greater Amarillo Affiliate COMMUNITY PROFILE REPORT 2009

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Susan G. Komen for the Cure®

Greater Amarillo Affiliate

Acknowledgements

The Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure wishes to thank everyone who helped to research, compile, and write this community profile. Many thanks to West Texas Family and Community Services, a project of the Psychology, Sociology and Social Work departments of West Texas A&M University, led by Sara E. Northrup, M.A., LBSW with assistance from Michael D. Nino, B.S. Without their research, this project could not have been successful. We also thank our current grantees, service providers, and key informants for their participation.

Additionally, the affiliate thanks Lisa Hoff Davis, Executive Director, and Brandi Ruiz, Mission Coordinator, for their work leading the project and compiling information. Finally, thanks to Whitney Kelly, Affiliate President, for writing the words around the data.

Table of Contents

4Executive Summary

4Introduction

4Overview Demographic and Breast Cancer Statistics Key Findings

4Overview of Programs and Services Key Findings

5Overview of Exploratory Data Key Findings

5Narrative of Affiliate Priorities

5Affiliate Action Plan

6Introduction

6Affiliate History

6Organizational Structure

6Description of Service Area

6Purpose of Report

7Demographic and Breast Cancer Statistics

7Data Source and Methodology Overview

7Overview of Key Demographic & Breast Cancer Statistics at State and County Level

10County/Counties of Interest: What the Data Shows

11Demographic and Breast Cancer Findings

13Programs and Services

13Data Source and Methodology Overview

13Programs and Services Overview

16Partnerships and Grant Opportunities

17Promising Practices and Evidence-Based Programs

17Public Policy Perspectives

18Programs and Service Findings

19Exploratory Data

19Data Sources and Methodology Overview

19Exploratory Data Overview

20Exploratory Data Findings

21Conclusions

21Putting the Data Together

21Selecting Affiliate Priorities

22Affiliate Action Plan

22Community Partnerships

22Existing Grant Solutions

22Needed Grant Opportunities

23Public Policy Efforts

24Education and Outreach

25List of Figures

25List of Tables

25List of Appendices

Executive Summary

Introduction

The Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure has held races for the past nineteen years and became an affiliate in 2003. The paid staff of the affiliate consists of the Executive Director, Lisa Hoff Davis, and Mission Coordinator, Brandi Ruiz (Ms. Ruiz’ position began in the 2009-2010 fiscal year, reporting to the Executive Director). The chapter serves the top twenty-six counties of the Texas Panhandle, an extremely large and mainly rural area. The population of the area is clustered in a few of the cities with a total population of approximately 413,000.

This profile discusses in detail the characteristics of the service area and breast cancer statistics for the area. It also provides an overview of programs and services available for breast health, explores findings of breast cancer incidence and mortality for the area, lists the affiliate’s priorities for programs and grant funding, and details the affiliate’s plan of action for the next two years.

Overview Demographic and Breast Cancer Statistics Key Findings

The initial data used was provided by Claritas Inc (2007) through the Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure. The secondary data provided qualitative and quantitative data for twenty-six counties in the Texas Panhandle. The figures provided by Claritas Inc (2007) also provided quantitative data regarding breast cancer and breast health throughout the United States.

Key Findings:

1. Twenty-two out of the twenty-six counties in the Greater Amarillo Affiliate area are over the highest (113.7) state average incidence rates. The affiliate should prioritize screening and support for these 22 counties: Armstrong, Donley, Briscoe, Childress, Collingsworth, Roberts, Hall, Wheeler, Carson, Gray, Swisher, Oldham, Lipscomb, Randall, Hutchison, Hemphill, Sherman, Castro, Potter, Hartley, Hansford, and Moore.

2. Almost 40 percent (39.4%) of women over the age of 40 reported not receiving a mammogram in the last twelve months.

3. Caucasian women are represented consistently in all four stages of breast cancer. However, African American women have higher rates of stage 3 and 4 breast cancer when compared to other ethnic groups.

Overview of Programs and Services Key Findings

Information for the breast cancer programs and services of the service area was collected through internet research, key informant interviews, and historical review of service providers. Information was collected at the county, city, and service area levels. After collecting all sources of breast cancer programs, staff reviewed all of the data for detailed schedules, services, program availability, and funding sources. The profile includes a listing of all service providers.

Services are scattered across the Panhandle, and treatment facilities are located only in Amarillo. Due to the small number of service and treatment providers, many women do not have access or have limited access to education, screening, and treatment for breast health.

Overview of Exploratory Data Key Findings

The exploratory data collected for the profile has helped the affiliate identify barriers to services, the cultural and behavioral considerations related to health care, the effect of location on services (rural vs. urban), and the best methods to supplement the statistical information as topics for further exploratory research.

Narrative of Affiliate Priorities

After consideration of the statistical and community data coupled with a review of the available programs and services, the affiliate has identified four priorities for the upcoming two years:

1. Fund programs for underserved women: 10% of families fall below the poverty line and 31% of women are uninsured.

2. Focus funding in six counties: Gray, Hansford, Potter, Randall, Dallam, and Carson. These counties are home to 67% of the Panhandle’s population while also representing high incidence and counties with service providers. The counties are also adjacent to counties without service providers so the affiliate can investigate rural versus urban obstacles to service.

3. Encourage partnerships: The expected success of the WISE Woman Project and the coordination of services created by the project highlight the potential for additional partnerships. Increased partnership and coordination with the BCCCP will stretch funding dollars and ensure more women have access to screening and diagnosis.

4. Address cultural and ethnic obstacles to education, screening, and diagnosis: Although Caucasian women are more than half of the population, the minority groups of the Panhandle are expected to grow faster than the Caucasian group during the upcoming census. Caucasian women have traditionally had better access to healthcare, so emphasis on minority groups will provide data for future programs and grant opportunities.

Affiliate Action Plan

The affiliate’s action plan details how it will increase success in the areas of community partnerships, building on best practices in existing grants, improving public policy efforts (especially with the BCCCP), and increase education and outreach opportunities.

Introduction

Affiliate History

The Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure has held races for the past nineteen years, but became an affiliate in 2003. Two paid staff shared the Executive Director position 2003-2005 and the current Executive Director was hired in 2005. The chapter has sustained continuous and admirable growth throughout its history. For grant year 2009-2010, the chapter awarded $217,000 to its grant recipients.

Organizational Structure

The paid staff of the affiliate consists of the Executive Director, Lisa Hoff Davis, and Mission Coordinator, Brandi Ruiz (Ms. Ruiz’ position began in the 2009-2010 fiscal year, reporting to the Executive Director). Ms. Davis reports to the eleven-member board of directors.

Description of Service Area

The chapter serves the top twenty-six counties of the Texas Panhandle: an extremely large and mainly rural area. The population of the area is clustered in a few of the cities with a total population of approximately 413,000. Area service providers draw clients from across the service area. Treatment providers are located in the center of the service area in Amarillo, so patients seeking treatment for breast cancer must travel to Amarillo for radiation or chemotherapy.

Figure 1

Purpose of Report

This profile will discuss in detail the characteristics of the service area and breast cancer statistics for the area. It will also provide an overview of programs and services available for breast health, explore findings of breast cancer incidence and mortality for the area, list the affiliate’s priorities for programs and grant funding, and detail the affiliate’s plan of action for the next two years.

Demographic and Breast Cancer Statistics

Data Source and Methodology Overview

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer in women throughout the world. A recent study estimated 1.15 million women were diagnosed with breast cancer and 411,000 died from it in 2002. Currently, there are approximately 4.4 million women living who have been diagnosed with breast cancer in the past five years throughout the world. Breast cancer incidence rates continue to rise with a 30-40 percent increase from 1970s to the 1990s, but more rapidly in developing counties. Just in the United States alone over 192,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer this year (American Cancer Society). Breast cancer and breast cancer awareness continues to be a major concern in the United States.

However, increased public discussion concerning breast health does not always translate into improved breast health practices—although research has shown early detection of cancer through mammography can improve a person’s survival rate. The following examines breast health, breast health practices, knowledge of breast health and willingness to seek out medical information regarding breast health in twenty-six counties in the Texas Panhandle. The objective is to identify gaps in services in the twenty-six counties, in order to lessen breast cancer mortality rates in the Texas Panhandle.

Data Source and Methodology Review:

The initial data used was provided by Claritas Inc (2007) through the Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure and West Texas A & M University. The secondary data provided qualitative and quantitative data for twenty-six counties in the Texas Panhandle. The figures provided by Claritas Inc (2007) also provided quantitative data regarding breast cancer and breast health throughout the United States. The study is exploratory, so the raw data was first reviewed. Once the data was reviewed specific questions began to emerge just purely from observation. As the data was thoroughly reviewed staff utilized multiple methods of research to complete the community profile. The affiliated used various types of data; specifically:

1. Demographic Data (age, race, education etc)

2. Specific breast health/cancer data (Incidence, Morality, and Prevalence)

Community Resources data obtained from a self-reported survey (N= 58)

Overview of Key Demographic & Breast Cancer Statistics at State and County Level

In order to understand the severity of breast cancer in the Texas Panhandle the affiliate first examined breast cancer rates at a national level. For the purposes of this study the total female population and the prevalent breast cancer cases for the 10 largest states were examined. The prevalent breast cancer rates compared to states total population are fairly small; however, when examining prevalent breast cancer cases for Texas and California, Texas had a higher ratio rate than California. The ratio for females diagnosed with breast cancer in California for 2007 is approximately 1 out of every 244; comparatively in Texas 1 out of every 222 were diagnosed with breast cancers in 2007. (See picture below.)

Figure 2

The Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure covers twenty-six counties in the Texas Panhandle. For the purposes of this study all twenty-six counties were analyzed. Once the initial data was analyzed for all twenty-six counties, six primary counties were identified for a deeper analysis using a survey developed by the profile team. The twenty-six counties are: Potter, Randall, Hutchison, Gray, Moore, Deaf Smith, Parmer, Ochiltree, Dallam, Swisher, Childress, Castro, Carson, Hansford, Wheeler, Donley, Hall, Hemphill, Lipscomb, Collingsworth, Hartley, Sherman, Oldham, Armstrong, Briscoe and Roberts.

The chart below shows breast cancer rates for all of the counties of the Panhandle:

Breast Cancer Prevalence by County

Area: Greater Amarillo Affiliate

Ranked by Prevalent Breast Cancer Cases (Desc)

National Average Age for Prevalence of Breast Cancer: 59.1

FIPS

 

 

 

Prevalent

Avg Age for

County

 

 

2007 Female

Breast Cancer

Prevalence of

Code

County

State

Population

Cases

Breast Cancer

48381

Randall

TX

57,044

271

58.2

48375

Potter

TX

59,940

271

59.7

48179

Gray

TX

10,581

56

61.7

48233

Hutchinson

TX

11,214

56

60.3

48117

Deaf Smith

TX

9,507

39

59.5

48341

Moore

TX

10,077

36

58.7

48369

Parmer

TX

4,890

21

60.1

48437

Swisher

TX

3,646

19

61.4

48111

Dallam

TX

4,461

19

59.7

48357

Ochiltree

TX

4,730

19

59.0

48069

Castro

TX

3,674

17

60.3

48075

Childress

TX

2,984

17

61.4

48065

Carson

TX

3,267

17

60.3

48483

Wheeler

TX

2,403

13

61.7

48129

Donley

TX

2,034

12

62.0

48195

Hansford

TX

2,691

12

60.9

48191

Hall

TX

1,928

11

62.4

48087

Collingsworth

TX

1,532

9

62.3

48211

Hemphill

TX

1,665

8

60.1

48295

Lipscomb

TX

1,550

8

61.4

48011

Armstrong

TX

1,153

7

61.6

48421

Sherman

TX

1,327

6

59.8

48359

Oldham

TX

1,073

5

59.3

48045

Briscoe

TX

805

5

61.7

Table 1

Based on population and reported breast cancer information, twenty counties were excluded from further study. For many of the counties, cancer information was suppressed due to the small number of cases. For other counties, their small populations coupled with the small number of cases of breast cancer made them unable to be examined with statistical accuracy.

Below are the counties (with their female population) that were excluded from statistical analysis:

County/Counties of Interest: What the Data Shows

Table 2

It is important to understand the target population for this current study. Most community profiles focus only on women age from 40-65; however, the affiliate believes this limits the study significantly and shuts the door on the young age groups. Although the risk of breast cancer is lower for women under the age of forty, there is still much to be learned about these younger populations and their knowledge of breast cancer and breast health. As a result, the following study focused in women ranging from ages 18 to 65<.

When examining the twenty-six primary counties, pertinent gaps were identified that must be addressed. First, almost forty percent (39.4%) of women over the age of forty reported not receiving a mammogram in the last twelve months. The most reported response for not receiving routine mammograms was other (15.7%).

Demographic and Breast Cancer Findings

The average incidence rates for the state of Texas range anywhere from 96.4 to 113.7 according the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. The second gap that is the most alarming is twenty-two out of the twenty-six counties in the Greater Amarillo Affiliate area are over the highest (113.7) state average incidence rates. The affiliate should prioritize screening and support for these 22 counties: Armstrong, Donley, Briscoe, Childress, Collingsworth, Roberts, Hall, Wheeler, Carson, Gray, Swisher, Oldham, Lipscomb, Randall, Hutchison, Hemphill, Sherman, Castro, Potter, Hartley, Hansford, and Moore.

Race:

Racial disparities in breast cancer cases for all four phases were examined using data provided by Claritas Inc (2007). Once the necessary data was complied and analyzed, the results showed Caucasian women have the most consistency across all counties with all four stages of breast cancer. The results also showed African American women have a higher rate of stages 3 and 4 of breast cancer compared to the other ethnic groups. The overall results of the data helped to develop more in-depth questions regarding race that would be administered in the survey of six counties mentioned earlier. It is apparent that there are some disparities among ethnic groups; however, further research must be employed to explore these disparities.

Six Primary Counties:

A basic questionnaire was developed to attempt to fill in some of the gaps observed in the initial data analysis. The survey instrument assessed basic demographic information; as well as pertinent questions regarding access to health care and health care/breast health practices. In order to obtain the most accurate and non-biased results 525 questionnaires were sent out the six primary counties via mail. Attached in the envelope was a consent form outlining the objective of the study and a post marked return envelope. This was to ensure a high return rate of completed questionnaires. Respondents were limited on the amount of time they had to return the filled questionnaire and signed consent. Unfortunately we were only able to obtain 58 completed questionnaires. This could have been for a number of reasons; the amount of time allotted, the subject matter, not of interest, etc.

The basic demographic data showed age ranged from 26 to 86 years of age with 51 being the median age. The majority of the respondents were from Gray County (41.4%); however, Hansford (17.2%), Potter (15.5%), Randall (10.3%), Dallam (10.3%), and Carson (5.2%) produced respondents. The majority of the respondents were Caucasian (91.4%), with Hispanic (6.9%) and American Indian (1.7%) representing the rest of the total population. The respondents educational background varied with the majority have a high school diploma (46.6%), followed by Bachelors Degree (20.7%), Associates Degree (13.8%), Masters Degree (8.6%), GED (5.2%), PhD/M.D (3.4%) and No formal education (1.7%).

Findings:

This study set out to examine breast health issues in the upper twenty-six counties of the Texas Panhandle. The survey data and data provided by Claritas Inc. (2007) provided the framework for the following conclusions.

First, twenty-two out of the twenty-six counties were found to have among the highest average incidence rate of breast cancer in the state. Additionally, these rates played out in comparison with another state. As previously mentioned, Texas has a higher ratio rate for women diagnosed with breast cancer than California. Even though California is more densely populated, Texas has more breast cancer cases.

These high rates of incidence beg further examination. The study found, among those surveyed, 40% of women over forty were not receiving annual mammograms for a variety of reasons. This is only one of three recommended steps for early detection. Targeted, continued education is a clear indication for this age group.

Finally, Caucasian women are represented consistently in all four stages of breast cancer. However, African American women have higher rates of stage 3 and 4 breast cancer when compared to other ethnic groups. Targeted educational campaigns could assist in a rate reduction in this particular group.

Programs and Services

Data Source and Methodology Overview

Information for the breast cancer programs and services of the service area was collected through internet research, key informant interviews, and historical review of service providers. Information was collected at the county, city, and service area levels. After collecting all sources of breast cancer programs, staff reviewed all of the data for detailed schedules, services, program availability, and funding sources.

Information and additional sources of information were collected from the Lubbock Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Texas Department of State Health Services, M.D. Anderson Hospital, American Cancer Society, Harrington Cancer Center, Baptist St. Anthony’s Health System, and United Way of Amarillo and Canyon.

Programs and Services Overview

For this project, staff collected all breast healthcare providers in the twenty-six county service area and compiled the contact information. This list represents fewer providers than are usually found in a large metropolitan area and shows how important the few providers are to this large region. Because the Comprehensive Breast Center of the Harrington Cancer Center and Texas Oncology are the only providers of chemotherapy and radiation treatment for breast cancer in the Panhandle, some women may drive more than 100 miles for treatment.

Although there are a few locations for mammography and mobile mammography programs, they are scattered across the service area and may still require women to drive more than an hour for screening. The scarcity of service providers creates many problems for access to healthcare due to transportation issues and difficulty for follow-up care.

Below is a listing of all breast healthcare providers in the twenty-six counties of the Texas Panhandle:

Breast Healthcare Providers by County

County (or service area)

Program/Service Provider

Armstrong County

Coalition of Health Services Inc. Claude Medical Clinic

201 S. Park

Claude, TX 79019

(806) 226-5611

Childress

Coalition of Health Services, Inc., Fox Rural Health Clinic

Highway 83 North

Childress, TX 79201

(940) 937- 9654

Gray

Pampa Regional Medical Center-Women’s Health Clinic

1 Medical Plaza

Pampa, TX 79065

(806) 663-5663

Hall

Fox Rural Health Clinic

Highway 83 North

Childress, TX 79201

(940) 937-9654

Hansford

Family Medical Center of Hansford County

702 S. Roland

Spearman, TX 76081

(806) 659-2846

Hemphill

Hemphill County Hospital-Harrington Cancer Center Mobile Mammography

1020 S. 4th Canadian, TX 79014

(806) 359-4673

Ochiltree

Perryton Health Center

3101 Garrett Dr. Perryton, TX 79070

(806) 435-7224

Potter/ Randall (Amarillo and Panhandle region)

Texas Panhandle Family Planning Health Centers

1501 S. Taylor

Amarillo, TX 79101

(806) 372- 8746

Comprehensive Breast Center of the Harrington Cancer Center

1310 Wallace Blvd.

Amarillo, TX 79106

(806) 356-1905

Northwest Women and Children Clinic

814 Martin Rd.

Amarillo, TX 79107

(806) 342-4789

Texas Oncology

1000 S Coulter St # 100, Amarillo, TX 79106

(806) 358-8654

Northwest Texas Hospital Women’s Imaging Center

1501 S. Coulter

Amarillo, TX 79106

(806) 354-1000

Women’s Healthcare & Associates

1301 S. Coulter Amarillo, TX 79106

(806) 355-6330

Sherman

Stratford Clinic

1220 Purnell PO Box 1107 Stratford, TX 79084

Table 3

As a graphical representation of these service providers as well as incidence and mortality of breast cancer, the map below illustrates incidence of breast cancer with blue pins, mortality with red pins, and service providers with yellow pins:

Figure 3

Because of the scarcity of providers for breast healthcare, the women of the Texas Panhandle have many impediments to service. Only eleven of the twenty-six counties have service providers, so a woman is more likely to have to travel outside her county than to receive service in her home county. Mammograms are provided in Amarillo, Hereford, and Dumas only. For mammograms in other towns, women rely on the mobile mammography unit of Harrington Cancer Center (For a detailed schedule of locations, see https://secure.harringtoncc.org/fileadmin/files/forms/comprehensive_breast_center/OUTREACH_DATES_2009.pdf). For women diagnosed with breast cancer, they have only two locations for treatment, both in Potter County. This scattering of service providers mirrors the problems identified through surveys and key informant interviews: many women do not have regular mammograms which leads to higher mortality rates throughout the area.

Partnerships and Grant Opportunities

The Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure currently partners with the Amarillo Area Breast Health Coalition to fund and support the WISE (Women Inspiring, Serving, and Educating) Woman Project. This project trains selected women in low income housing communities to educate their neighbors and friends about access and use of available breast health programs. The project began in August 2008 and the first women were trained in April 2009. The project has the potential to reach hundreds of women and builds additional partnerships with American Cancer Society, American Housing Foundation, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (Laura W. Bush Center for Women’s Health and School of Medicine), Baptist St. Anthony’s Health System, and Harrington Cancer Center. For the project, Komen for the Cure acts as the funding source for most of the program with other partners providing staff, services, and in-kind donations. It also provides seamless services for traditionally underserved women who do not regularly receive mammograms.

Through the WISE Woman Project, a woman can receive breast health information and instruction about access to mammograms, participate in “mammogram events” to receive a Komen-funded mammogram, and then be referred to another partner for treatment and support. The project includes transportation and child care in order to remove the two most frequently cited reasons for not being able to access services.

In addition to this project, Komen Amarillo is excited about its current grantees and its increased reach across the service area. Beginning in the 2009-2010 grant cycle, the affiliate has granted funding for a project of the Texas A & M Agrilife Extension to educate older, rural women about breast health screening and funding for appropriate services. The Agrilife Extension has offices in all counties of the Panhandle and will be able to reach women who have not been served by other grants.

Another grant that is reaching across the Panhandle is being conducted by Amarillo College’s public broadcasting television station, KACV. KACV will produce and broadcast public service announcements about breast health in both English and Spanish. Because KACV’s service area mirrors Komen Amarillo’s, the affiliate sees this grant as a great way to both publicize Komen’s impact on the area and make breast health information available to all women in the Panhandle.

Other current grantees include Amarillo Girl Scouts and Harrington Cancer Center. Under the Girl Scouts’ grant one event will educate girls and women about breast cancer risk factors and early detection methods. Under the Harrington Cancer Center grant, Komen provides screening and diagnostic mammography for medically underserved women. It especially targets women who are 18-35 years old and have high risk factors for breast cancer. Because Harrington is a BCCCP provider, the center maximizes available funding by determining which funding source better serves the patient. Because BCCCP funds have been decreasing, Komen funds have become critical for providing mammograms for underserved women.

Based on current grants, Komen Amarillo is successfully attempting to reach all of its service area and women who can benefit from breast health education, programs, and services. However, the performance of the grants will determine the success of the programs. The affiliate will continue to encourage entities that serve the entire Panhandle to apply for funds. Until additional service providers can be found, Komen Amarillo hopes to continue to fund Harrington Cancer Center and its programs for low income, underserved women.

Promising Practices and Evidence-Based Programs

For this funding cycle, grantees, medical professionals, and community members attended a grant workshop hosted by the affiliate and facilitated by the National Cancer Institute; most of them have included evidence-based objectives in their grants. The affiliate has already begun to plan the workshop for 2010 and expects to conduct it yearly for existing and potential grantees. This will ensure all grantees incorporate evidence-based programs and best practices from other grantees.

The WISE Woman Project, Agrilife grant, and Harrington Cancer Center grant have strong components of objective measurement and community impact: the affiliate will know exactly how many women receive education, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Public Policy Perspectives

Komen Amarillo coordinates services with the BCCCP through the services of Harrington Cancer Center, the main provider of cancer screening and treatment for the Texas Panhandle. For the past few years, funding from BCCCP has been declining, so Komen Amarillo has recently allowed the Cancer Center to revise its grant to include women of all ages.

Although more than 134,000 women have been served since 1992 through the BCCCP (Dorothy Marley, BCCCP representative), only about 20,000 Texas women are served each year, reaching a mere 3% of those who are eligible for services. The director of BCCCP for Texas is Emelda Garcia. The affiliate has not built a relationship with her, but will plan to begin to coordinate with her during the next few years to improve women’s access to the BCCCP funding and services.

The affiliate has a much better relationship with all of its elected officials. The Amarillo mayor, Debra McCartt has been a regular supporter and participant in the Race for the Cure. The Executive Director has recently lobbied both state and national representatives. In January 2009, Ms. Davis met with Senator Kel Seliger and Representatives David Swinford, John Smithee, and Warren Chisum. In April 2009, she travelled to Washington, D.C. to meet with Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn and Representatives Mac Thornberry and Randy Neugebaur.

The affiliate has good working relationships with state representatives and will strive to improve the relationships with its national elected officials.

Programs and Service Findings

From a thorough review of the available programs and services of the Texas Panhandle, the affiliate affirmed its understanding of the thin coverage of its service area. Many women do not have access to basic services and programs. The affiliate continues to initiate discussions with the region’s healthcare centers about grant opportunities through Komen for the Cure. During the collection of exploratory data, the researchers investigated how women accessed healthcare and what the women perceived as barriers to service.

Exploratory Data

Data Sources and Methodology Overview

The SGK data packs provided by Thomson Reuters have given an excellent insight into local cancer estimates.

There are questions that require further exploration in the overall assessment process. This additional, subjective data will be collected from surveys, focus groups and other methods identified in community data. The following are identified for further study:

· What are the barriers to services?

· What are the cultural and behavioral considerations related to health care?

· What effect does location have on services (rural vs. urban)?

· What is the best method to supplement the statistical information?

As this information is preliminary, further study will produce more conclusive results.

Exploratory Data Overview

The section of the survey dedicated to the breast health and breast cancer knowledge produced some interesting results. Of the 58 respondents 86.2% reported having easy access to medical services, 96.6 % reported having received information concerning self-breast exams, and 91.4% receiving information on breast cancer and breast health, 100% reported that mammograms are important to women’s overall health. When respondents were asked if they had ever received a mammogram (82.8%) and if they had received a mammogram in the last twelve months (60.3), an overwhelming majority reported yes. Also, almost ninety percent (87.7) of respondents reported receiving annual physical exams.

Those respondents who reported never receiving a mammogram or not receiving a mammogram in the last twelve months were asked why not: interestingly, the majority of the responded to the “other” category (26.7%), followed by to expensive/no insurance (20%), haven’t had any problems (20%), put it off/ too lazy (16.7%), didn’t know I needed it (3.3%), and never thought about it (3.3%). Those who marked the other category were given the opportunity to specify their reason here were some of the most common responses:

“Dr. suggested waiting until age 40”

“It was not due”

“Needs to be done every two years”

“Breast Feeding”

“Scared”

“Dr. Moved Away”

Exploratory Data Findings

The exploratory data collected for the community profile brought up more opportunities for research. The affiliate understands that a larger sample size would produce statistically relevant information. However, addressing the response rate to surveys will have to be improved first. The affiliate has identified barriers to services, the cultural and behavioral considerations related to health care, effect of location on services (rural vs. urban), and best methods to supplement the statistical information as topics for further exploratory research.

Conclusions

Target Area Findings

From the quantitative and qualitative data collected for the community profile, the affiliate discovered many areas of attention in the Texas Panhandle. First, twenty-two out of the twenty-six counties were found to have among the highest average incidence rate of breast cancer in the state.

These high rates of incidence beg further examination. The study found, among those surveyed, 40% of women over 40 were not receiving annual mammograms for a variety of reasons. Clearly, targeted and continued education is indicated for this age group.

Additionally, Caucasian women are represented consistently in all four stages of breast cancer. However, African American women have higher rates of stage 3 and 4 breast cancer when compared to other ethnic groups. Targeted educational campaigns could assist in a rate reduction in this particular group.

Research also confirmed the affiliate’s understanding of the thin service coverage of the area: Many women do not have access to basic services and programs. The affiliate continues to initiate discussions with the region’s healthcare centers about grant opportunities through Komen for the Cure. Barriers to service and rural versus urban access will become a priority for further investigation during the next two years.

Finally, the exploratory data helped the affiliate identify barriers to services, the cultural and behavioral considerations related to health care, effect of location on services (rural vs. urban), and best methods to supplement the statistical information as topics for further exploratory research.

Putting the Data Together

Because of the suppressed data (due to small numbers) in many of the service area counties, the affiliate removed many of the counties from further study. Additionally, the small number of service providers also limited the opportunities for further investigation. After examining incidence and mortality for available counties, the affiliate paired the service providers to counties with high incidence or mortality from breast cancer. Then, based on responses to surveys, the affiliate uncovered the recurring themes of high incidence and mortality due to limited access to services and educational needs based on the sparse service providers and few education opportunities.

Selecting Affiliate Priorities

After reviewing breast cancer statistics for the twenty-six counties of the Texas Panhandle, examining the available programs and services, and incorporating exploratory data, the affiliate has identified the following priorities for the upcoming two years:

1. Target underserved women: 10% of families fall below the poverty line, 31% of women are uninsured, and 40% of women over forty did not get an annual mammogram.

2. Focus funding in six counties: Gray, Hansford, Potter, Randall, Dallam, and Carson. These counties are home to 67% of the Panhandle’s population while also representing high incidence and counties with service providers. The counties are also adjacent to counties without service providers so the affiliate can investigate rural versus urban obstacles to service.

3. Encourage partnerships: The expected success of the WISE Woman Project and the coordination of services created by the project highlight the potential for additional partnerships. Increased partnership and coordination with the BCCCP will stretch funding dollars and ensure more women have access to screening and diagnosis.

4. Address cultural and ethnic obstacles to education, screening, and diagnosis: Although Caucasian women are more than half of the population, the minority groups of the Panhandle are expected to grow faster than the Caucasian group during the upcoming census. Caucasian women have traditionally had better access to healthcare, so emphasis on minority groups will provide data for future programs and grant opportunities.

Affiliate Action Plan

Community Partnerships

The affiliate will pursue additional community partnership opportunities and will encourage grantees to engage in partnership activities. This supports item 3 of the priority list and ensures grant funding makes the greatest impact on the community.

Existing Grant Solutions

The affiliate has already begun to address some of the issues uncovered by the community profile. The WISE Woman Project is a new partnership of both new and previous grantees working together to serve low income, minority women in two of the target counties. Also, the Texas Agrilife grant is providing education opportunities across the entire service area. Both grants provide opportunities for future best practices to address the affiliate’s priorities.

Needed Grant Opportunities

Future grant opportunities should expand existing grant work. Future grants should bring more education and screening to rural areas (like the Texas Agrilife grant), focus on serving low income and minority women (like the WISE Woman Project), or address the high incidence and mortality of the targeted counties (like all of the existing grantees). The affiliate ensures future grantees will understand and address these needs by conducting annual grant writing workshops with the help of the Cancer Information Service of the National Cancer Institute.

Public Policy Efforts

In order to improve the affiliate’s coordination with the BCCCP funding, staff will begin work with the Texas Director (or her designee) to discuss ways to improve the 3% of women who are eligible for services.

Education and Outreach

Education and outreach continue to be high priorities for the affiliate. Through both quantitative and qualitative data, the affiliate learned that women throughout the service area did not know how to access services or were ignorant of basic breast health concepts. The affiliate will continue to work for additional education opportunities: its recent hiring of a Mission Coordinator demonstrates its commitment to education. The community profile uncovered the need to address cultural and ethnic barriers to service which the affiliate will incorporate into future grant requests.

List of Figures

Figure 1: Service Area Map

Figure 2: Incidence Rates for Texas

Figure 3: Resource Map

List of Tables

Table 1: Breast Cancer Prevalence by County

Table 2: 20 Remaining Counties

Table 3: Breast Healthcare Providers by County

List of Appendices

Appendix A: Focus Group Sample Questions

Appendix B: Key Informant Interview Sample Questions

Appendix C: Survey Request

Appendix D: Consent Form

Appendix E: Key Informant Survey

Appendix F: Key Informant Interview Guide

Appendix G: Survey Scripts

Appendix H: National and Texas Breast Health Program and Service Providers

Appendices

Appendix A:

Focus Group Sample Questions

1. Do you go to the doctor regularly? Do you have a local healthcare provider?

2. Where is someone most likely to go for breast health information?

3. What does breast health screening mean to you? Do you know the recommended guidelines for breast health screening?

4. If you didn’t have insurance, what would you expect to pay for a mammogram?

5. What do you think are the barriers that prevent women from seeking or getting breast health screening in your community?

Examples if no one is responding:

a. Transportation

b. Financial/Uninsured

c. Lack of facilities/providers for your community

6. What could your doctor do to encourage women to seek breast health services?

Examples if no one is responding:

a. Reminder at each visit

b. Link you to program/service that would help pay

c. Nothing, I would need insurance first

7. What type of program could we provide to make it easier for women to access breast health services?

Examples if no one is responding:

a. Mobile Mammogram Units

b. Transportation/Vouchers

c. Awareness Campaigns

d. Helpline/Hotline (with translators)

8. Who could we partner with in your community to best get the word out about breast health to women in this community?

9. What does Susan G Komen for the Cure mean to you?

a. Do you know what we do in the Columbus Community?

Survivors

1. Did you have any difficulty finding providers/services?

2. What was the most difficult and most beneficial aspect of your breast cancer experience?

3. What programs/services would you recommend to other survivors? What advice would you give them?

4. How much did financial considerations affect your treatment decisions? Did your work schedule impact your decisions?

5. What services were missing? Support Groups, survivorship programs, after-care, etc

6. In your community, where should Komen prioritize its funding: Education, Screening, Treatment, Survivorship?

Appendix B:

Key Informant Interview Sample Questions

Key informant interviews should include five to ten questions that provide in-depth understanding to specific areas of focus. Initial scripted questions start the discussion, but the interviewer should always probe and ask more questions to clarify dialogue and get as much information as possible on the topic.

The questions created by the community profile team should always be tailored to who is being interviewed. Additionally, the questions should address the gaps in knowledge that still exist after collecting and reviewing demographic data, breast cancer statistics and program and services reports. Data collected using key informant interviews will only be as good as the questions the community profile team creates to address the real issues in the community.

When creating the questions, the team should always ask the following:

· Why do we want to know this?

· Who will be interviewed? i.e. provider, community member, etc.

· Is this going to lead to areas we can address?

· How will this inform our (grants process, marketing, education) efforts in the community?

When creating the questions, the team should remember these rules:

· Use open-ended questions

· Avoid questions that can be answered with yes or no

· Focus the questions from general to specific

The questions provided here are examples that may help the community profile team understand what types of questions to create for and ask of a key informant.

Key Informant Sample Questions (Providers)

1. How would you describe the women who are least likely to be getting regular breast health screening?

a. What neighborhoods do these women live in?

b. Where do they work?

c. What businesses do they frequent?

d. Describe their ethnic background.

e. What are their family situations like?

2. How would you describe the women who are least likely to receive effective breast health services? * see above probing questions

3. How successful is the current healthcare system in meeting the needs for breast healthcare and treatment?

4. How effective are the financial assistance programs in your community in helping women access breast health services?

5. What types of programs do you think would help to improve the current system?

6. If funding was made available, is your organization willing (alone or in partnership) to provide services that expand on existing services or address gaps in services?

7. How can organizations working in the field of breast cancer collaborate more?

8. What are some of the barriers to collaboration in your community?

9. Are there specific breast health partnerships that could be formed to address specific breast health gaps in your community?

10. What would a Komen partnership with your organization look like?

11. What laws or policies make it difficult for women to get breast health services in your community?

12. What efforts, if any, does your organization make to market breast health information in your community?

13. What policies do insurance providers follow related to clinical trial coverage in this community?

Key Informant Sample Questions (Survivorship)

1. When and where was the cancer diagnosed?

2. Were you advised of your treatment options?

3. What stage was the cancer when detected?

4. When did you begin to receive treatment?

5. What stage was the cancer when treatment began?

6. How has this affected your life – physically, financially, and emotionally?

Interviewing Tips

Use probing techniques to encourage conversation without influencing the answer. Two kinds of probes are used for open-ended questions – probing for clarity and probing for additional information.

The best probes for clarity are the ones that tell the respondent exactly what you need to know, or what you want them to do.

· For example: What do you mean? Could you be more specific? Could you tell me more about ____? Could you give me an example?

Once a clear response has been given, the interviewer can probe for additional responses to the question. The best way to do this is to repeat the main point of the question as part of a request for further information.

· For example: What else do you think? What other reason exist?

Avoid asking “is there anything else” because this can be answered with NO.

Appendix C:

Survey Request

April 9, 2009

The Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure is seeking female participants for a research study. You have been randomly selected to participate in this study. The title of this study is:

Factors in Women’s Breast Health: A Survey of Six Texas Panhandle Counties

The purpose of this exploratory, descriptive study is to examine medical and educational resources for women regarding breast cancer in six counties of the Texas Panhandle. The counties that will be explored are Carson, Dallam, Gray, Hansford, Potter and Randall.

There are few risks in participating in this study. You may feel uncomfortable about answering some of the questions in the survey instrument. You may opt out at any time and may choose to leave questions unanswered. Your participation is strictly voluntary and is confidential; there will be no way to link your answers with your name. Data will be reported in aggregate form only.

By participating in this study, you may help us generate a better understanding of what kind of problems women might face, and if their needs are being met regarding breast health and other related variables. These variables have been identified as being important and relevant to social work practice in today’s society and will help in developing new and progressive services in the Komen service area. Participation will require approximately 2-5 minutes of your time. If you agree to participate, please fill the attached survey and return it to:

In order to compile this sensitive data in an effective and efficient manner, we ask you to please return the survey in the attached envelope by April 23, 2009. Your participation in this study is greatly appreciated and we would like to say thanks on behalf of the Greater Amarillo Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure and the many fighting breast cancer.

Sincerely,

Sara Northrup, M.A., LBSW

West Texas Family and Community Services

A project of West Texas A&M University

601 W. 10th

Amarillo, Texas 79101

Appendix D:

Consent Form

Consent Form for Participation in:

Factors in Women’s Breast Health: A Survey of Six Texas Panhandle Counties

Date: _________________________

I agree to participate in the research project entitled” Factors in Women’s Breast Health: A Survey of Six Panhandle Counties”. I have read the attached informed consent form, and I understand the possible consequences of participation. I also understand that my participation is strictly voluntary and that I may withdraw my consent at any time. By signing below I certify that I am at least 18 years of age or older.

Signed:

___________________________________________________

Printed Name:

_______________________________________________

Appendix E:

Key Informant Survey

(Please mark answers with an X to indicate your responses)

1. Please indicate the current county you live in.

A. Carson____

B. Dallam____

C. Gray____

D. Hansford_____

E. Potter____

F. Randall____

2. What is your date of birth?

Month_____ Day ________Year_________

3. What is your ethnicity?

A. Hispanic/Spanish/Latino

E. Asian Indian________

B. White

F. American Indian_____

C. Black or African American______

G. Other (Specify)

D. Asian or Pacific Islander____

H. Don’t Know

4. What is your highest level of education?

A. GED____

D. Masters degree____

B. High School Diploma____

E. Ph.D.____

C. Associates degree____

F. None of these____

D. Bachelors degree____

5. Is it easy for you to access medical services?

A. Yes____

B. No_____

(If answered Yes, skip to question 7)

6. If No, why not?

(Please check all that apply)

A. Transportation___

B. Financial Troubles___

C. No child care_______

D. No support system_____

E. Other____________

7. Have you ever received information on self-breast exams?

A. Yes____

B. No____

8. Have you ever received information about breast cancer/breast health?

A. Yes____

B. No____

(If answered Yes, skip to question 10)

9. If No, why not?

(Check all that apply)

A. No reason/Never thought about it____

E. Don’t know how____

B. Didn’t know I needed it______

F. The test is unpleasant______

C. Haven’t had any problems______

G. Not important____

D. Put it off/Laziness______

10. Do you have a family history of breast cancer?

A. Yes____

B. No_____

11. How much do you know about breast health/preventative health?

A. Nothing at all___

B. Only a little____

C. More than most____

D. A great deal____

12. Have you ever received information about breast cancer/breast health?

A. Yes_____

B. No______

13. Do you think mammograms are important to your overall health?

A. Yes_____

B. No______

14. Have you ever been/currently diagnosed with any form of cancer?

A. Yes_____

B. No______

(If answered No, skip to question 16)

15. If so, which type?

A. Lung_____

B. Breast_____

C. Colon_____

D. Rectal _____

E. Prostate_____

16. Have you ever had a mammogram?

A. Yes____

B. No_____

(If answer No, skip to question 18)

17. Have you had a mammogram in the last 12 months?

A. Yes______

B. No______

(If answer Yes, skip to question 19)

18. Why not?

(Please check all that apply)

A. No reason/Never thought about it____

E. Too Expensive/No Insurance____

B. Didn’t know I needed it______

F. The test is unpleasant______

C. Haven’t had any problems______

G. No transportation_______

D. Put it off/Laziness______

H. Other_______________

19. Do you receive annual clinical exams?

A. Yes______

B. No______

(If answered Yes, you are finished with the survey!)

20. Why not?

(Please check all that apply)

A. No reason/Never thought about it____

E. Too Expensive/No Insurance____

B. Didn’t know I needed it______

F. The test is unpleasant______

C. Haven’t had any problems______

G. No transportation_______

D. Put it off/Laziness______

H. Other______________

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION.

Appendix F:

Key Informant Interview Guide

Hello, my name is ______________. May I speak with your clinic manager? I am calling with Susan G. Komen for the Cure. We are working on a project to collect information about breast health education and resources in the Texas Panhandle. We are contacting you because you are a clinic manager and we would like to ask if you would be willing to answer a few questions about your clinic that will help us determine our future funding priorities. It is less than 15 minutes long and would provide essential information that will help our community address breast health. Would you be willing to help with our project?

The first questions I am going to ask you are about breast health education at your clinic.

1) Where are the women you serve likely to go for breast health information?

(You may select more than one option.) (do not read options )

Healthcare providers

Community advocacy group

Online

Printed material such as books or pamphlets

Friends/Family

Other: Please list ______________________________

2) Do you provide breast health education materials through your organization?

No

Yes

Unsure

3) Do you serve a non-English speaking population at your site that would benefit from breast health messages and services?

No (skip to question 7)

Yes

4) Do you provide non-English breast health education materials?

No

Yes (skip to question 5)

Unsure

4a) Do you know where you can access non-English materials if you should need them?

No

Yes

5) I am going to read you a list of languages that patients in your clinic may speak. For each,

please say yes or no to indicate whether your clinic would have a need for breast health education resources in that language.

Spanish Yes No Unsure

Russian Yes No Unsure

Hmong Yes No Unsure

Somali Yes No Unsure

Other: Please list _____________________?

6) Does your site currently use interpreters to provide breast health education in other languages?

No, we are not able to provide interpreters for breast health education in other languages

No, we do not have a need for interpreters to provide breast health education

Yes, we use interpreters to provide breast health education

Unsure

7) I am going to read a list of women that are often targeted for breast health education. Please tell us if your organization targets these populations for breast health education.

women 50 years old and older Yes No Unsure

40 to 49 year old women Yes No Unsure

18 to 39 year old women Yes No Unsure

Women in racial groups that are at high risk for breast cancer Yes No Unsure

Women in ethnic groups that are at high risk for breast cancer Yes No Unsure

Everyone gets materials Yes No Unsure

7a) What populations of women come into your clinic that you believe would benefit from being targeted with additional breast health education or screening services?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

7b) I am going to read you a list of types of health care providers. Please respond to each by telling me if that type of provider offers breast health education at your site.

Physicians Yes No Unsure

Physician assistants Yes No Unsure

Master’s level prepared nurses Yes No Unsure

RNs Yes No Unsure

Community health workers Yes No Unsure

Other, please specify: _______________________________________________

The next questions I am going to ask relate to screening and diagnostic services that are available at your clinic.

9) Do the providers in your organization provide breast screening and diagnostic tests?

No (skip to question 12)

Yes

Unsure (skip to question 12)

9a) Breast health screenings include mammograms and clinical breast exams. I am going to read you a list of types of health care providers. Please respond to each by telling me if that type of provider offers any breast health screenings at your site.

Physicians Yes No Unsure

Physician assistants Yes No Unsure

Master’s level prepared nurses Yes No Unsure

RNs Yes No Unsure

Radiologists Yes No Unsure

Other, please specify: _______________________________________________

10) Please choose the statement that best describes how your clinic prioritizes breast cancer screening and education?

Our clinic addresses breast health at every well woman visit regardless of any other issues that are addressed.

We address breast health at well woman visits if there is not a more prominent concern based on the patient’s medical history.

We address breast health at well woman visits only when there is a specific concern about this issue.

11) Does your organization have formal policies that require providers to conduct clinical breast exams on women during their well woman visits?

No

Yes

Unsure

12) Does your organization provide referrals to other clinics if a woman needs breast health screening and education services that are not available at your site?

No

Yes

Unsure

12a) I am going to read a list of barriers that may prevent women from seeking or obtaining breast health services. Please tell me if you perceive the issue to be a barrier for women in your community.

Income Yes No Unsure

Patients are uninsured Yes No Unsure

Patients are under-insured Yes No Unsure

Transportation Yes No Unsure

Fear Yes No Unsure

Other: Please list ___________________

13) What do you think would help improve the delivery of breast health services in the current healthcare system?

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

14) Is your clinic able to provide breast cancer screening services to women with disabilities (i.e. mammography capacity for wheelchair bound women)?

No

Yes

Unsure

The next few questions ask about how women pay for services at your clinic.

15) I am going to read a list of ways people pay for health services. Please tell me if patients at your clinic use the following method to pay for breast health services.

PPO private payer insurance Yes No Unsure

HMOs Yes No Unsure

Public (govt.) insurance Yes No Unsure

Other, please list: _________________________________

16) Does your site offer any type of financial assistance for uninsured, underinsured or low income clients?

No (skip to question 19)

Yes

Unsure (skip to question 19)

17) Please respond yes or no to indicate whether your site provides each service in the list to income qualifying women.

Reduced price mammograms Yes No Unsure

Reduced price appointments including clinical breast exams Yes No Unsure

Free mammograms Yes No Unsure

Free appointments including clinical breast exams Yes No Unsure

Referrals to sources that provide

free/reduced price mammograms/appointments Yes No Unsure

Other, please list: ______________________________________________

18) What is the income threshold for patients to be eligible for those services? Patients must be…

Below the federal poverty line

Between 100% and 200% of the poverty line

Between 200-250% of the poverty line

Unsure

Other, please list: __________________________________________________

19) Do you know of other organizations in your community that offer financial assistance to uninsured or under-insured women for breast health services?

No (skip to question 20)

Yes

19 a) Please list them _______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

My final questions today are about partnerships that some organizations are able to form to address breast health needs in the community.

20) Do you presently partner with any other local organizations in providing breast health services to women in your community?

No (skip to closing)

Yes

Unsure (skip to closing)

20a) Please list partnering organizations and describe the partnerships

Organization Type of partnership

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Closing: Thank you for your time and valuable feedback. We greatly appreciate your participation.

Appendix G:

Survey Scripts

The survey introduction serves several purposes:

· Helps establish the nature of the relationship between the interviewer and the respondent.

· Establishes a context for the questions and the respondent’s answers.

· Establishes credibility.

· Provides an incentive for the respondent. The incentive is often the feeling the respondent has in cooperating and knowing that their contribution will help lead to a better community.

The introduction should include:

· An introduction to interviewer and organization behind project

· A statement of purpose

· A thank you statement

· An explanation of the importance of respondent’s input

· A confidentiality statement and

· An overview of how data will be used

Sample Phone Script

Hello, I'm ______ calling on behalf of Susan G Komen for the Cure. We are doing a survey and are asking questions about breast cancer services and your community. The information provided will be used to help Susan G Komen for the Cure’s local office to create a community profile report which will then inform the work we do in the community. Your name and number was obtained (describe how person/organization was chosen). Because you are a community leader and involved in breast cancer we feel your input is valuable and should be included in our report.

Your responses are completely confidential and will only be viewed by the community profile team that is helping us create the community profile report. You don't have to answer any question you don't want to, and you can end the interview at any time. The interview takes about (estimate time). Please feel free to ask any questions you have as we go through the survey and if there is something that I can’t answer today, I will provide you the phone number and email address of the contact person at Susan G Komen for the Cure.

Begin Scripted Survey Questions

Sample In-Person Script

Hello, I'm ______ working with Susan G Komen for the Cure on the community profile project. Thank you for meeting with me today to complete this survey on breast cancer in our community. The information you provide will be used to help Susan G Komen for the Cure’s local office create a community profile report which will then inform the work we do in the community. Your input will help us determine our community’s priorities as they relate to breast cancer and help us determine how our money is best granted, what outreach and advocacy we should be focusing on and in general what areas of focus we need to be aware and involved in. Your name and number was obtained (describe how person/organization was chosen). Because you are a community leader and involved in breast health we feel your input is valuable and should be included in our report.

Your responses are completely confidential and will only be viewed by the community profile team that is helping us analyze the data and put together the community profile report. You don't have to answer any question you don't want to, and you can end the interview at any time. The interview should take about (estimate time). Please feel free to ask any questions you have as we go through the survey and if there is something that I can’t answer today, I will provide you the phone number and email address of the contact person at Susan G Komen for the Cure.

Begin Scripted Survey Questions

Appendix H:

National and Texas Breast Health, Program, and Service Providers

County

Provider

Address

Town

Phone #

Website

Screening

Armstrong

Coalition of Health Services Inc.

201 S. Park

Claude, TX  79019

806-226-5611

Childress

Coalition of Health Services, Inc., Fox Rural Clinic

Highway 83 North

Childress,  TX  79201

940-937-9654

Childress Regional Medical Center

PO Box 1030

Childress,  TX  79201

940-937-6371

Gray

Pampa Regional Medical Center

1 Medical Plaza

Pampa, TX  79065

806-663-5509

signaturehospital.com

Hutchinson

Golden Plains Community Hospital

200 South McGee

Borger, TX  79007

806-273-1220

Moore

Moore County Hospital District

224 East 2nd St

Dumas, TX  79029

806-935-7171

Ochiltree

Perryton Health Center/ Ochiltree General Hospital

3101 Garrett Dr.

Perryton, TX  79070

806-435-7224

Potter/Randall

Texas Panhandle Family Planning Health Clinic

1501 S. Taylor

Amarillo, TX 79101

806-372-8746

The Don and Sybil Harrington Cancer Center

1500 Wallace Blvd

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-356-1905

Harringtoncc.org

Women's Healthcare Associates

1301 S. Coulter, suite 300

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-355-6330

Comprehensive Breast Center of the Harrington Cancer Center

1310 Wallace Blvd.

Amarillo, TX 79106

806-356-1905

secure.harringtoncc.org

Texas Diagnostic Imagine Center

1000 Coulter

Amarillo Tx  79106

806-358-1010

Northwest Texas Hospital

1501 South Coulter Rd

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-354-1703

Coulter Imaging, LLC

1900 S. Coulter, Suite N

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-358-7149

Amarillo Family Physicians Clinic, PA

suite 100 South 1215 South Coulter

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-354-1703

Amarillo Diagnostic Center

6700 West Ninth

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-358-0228

Northwest Women and Children Clinic

814 Martin Rd.

Amarillo, TX 79107

806-342-4789

Sherman

Stratford Clinic

1220 Purnell PO Box

Stratford, TX  79084

806-396-2852

Treatment

Comprehensive Breast Center

1310 Wallace Blvd.

Amarillo, TX 79106

806-356-1905

Texas Diagnostic Imagine Center

1000 Coulter

Amarillo Tx  79106

806-358-1010

Education

Susan G Komen for the Cure Greater Amarillo Affiliate

PO Box 50610

Amarillo TX  79159

806-354-9706

The Don and Sybil Harrington Cancer Center

1500 Wallace Blvd

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-356-1905

Harringtoncc.org

Comprehensive Breast Center of the Harrington Cancer Center

1310 Wallace Blvd.

Amarillo, TX 79106

806-356-1905

Amarillo Area Breast Health Coalition

301 S. Polk St., Suite 740

Amarillo, TX 

806-331-4710

aabhc.org/

American Cancer Society

3915 Bell St

Amarillo, TX 79109

806-353-4306

cancer.org

National Education

National Breast Cancer Coalition

800-622-2839

natlbcc.org

Women's Cancer Network

312-644-6610

wcn.org

Young Survival Coalition

212-916-7667

youngsurvival.org

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

800-345-6324

American Cancer Society

800-227-2345

cancer.org

Susan G. Komen for the Cure

877-465-6636

komen.org

National Cancer Institute

800-4Cancer

Cancer.gov

Project Aware

project-aware.org

Cancer Treatment Centers of America

800-268-0768

Cancer Care

800-813-4673

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

hhs.gov

Breast Cancer Network of Strength

Medicine World

Texas Education

Texas Cancer Data Center

txcancer.org

Texas Department of State Health Services

dshs.state.tx.us

Texas Cancer Information

texascancer.info

Texas Department of Health

888-963-7111

tdh.state.tx.us

Texas Oncology

Mobile Mammograms

Hemphill County Hospital

1020 South Fourth

Canadian TX

806-323-6422

Clarendon Church of Christ

301 Carhart

Clarendon, TX

806-874-2495

Coon Memorial Hospital

1411 Denver Avenue

Dalhart, TX

806-246-4571

Medical Center of Dimmitt

300 W. Halsell

Dimmitt, TX

806-647-2194

Plains Memorial Hospital

310 West Halsell Box 278

Dimmitt, TX

806-647-2191 ext. 14

Parmer County Hospital

1307 Cleveland

Friona, TX

806-250-2754

www.pcchtx.com

Hereford South Plains Health Provider

110 N. 25 Mile Ave. Suite A

Hereford, TX

806-364-7688

Hansford County Hospital

707 S. Roland

Spearman, TX

806-659-2535 

Swisher Memorial Hospital

539 Southeast Second

Tulia, TX

806-995-3581

Parkview Hospital

901 Sweetwater Street

Wheeler, TX

806-826-5581

Support

Transportation

American Cancer Society/ Road to Recovery

3915 Bell St

Amarillo, TX 79109

877-227-1618

www.cancer.org

Panhandle Community Services- Panhandle Transit

1309 W. 8th

Amarillo, TX  79120

806-372-2531

Medicaid Transportation

877-633-8747

Jan Werner Transit

3108 S Fillmore

Amarillo, TX  79110

806-374-5516

Housing

Ronald McDonald House of Amarillo

1501 Streit

Amarillo, TX

806-358-8177

Circle of Friends Apartments

American Cancer Society

3915 Bell St

Amarillo, TX 79109

806- 353-4306

www.cancer.org

Support Groups

The Don and Sybil Harrington Cancer Center

1500 Wallace Blvd

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-356-1905

www.Harringtoncc.org

Pathways

On-going support group

Journeys

2nd Monday of each month

5:30-7:00 PM

Amphitheater, 2nd floor

Women in Touch

3rd Monday of each month

5:30-7:00 PM

Amphitheater, 2nd floor

Dialogue

Thursdays

noon-1:00 PM

Amphitheater, 2nd floor

Radiation Therapy Class

Tuesdays

9:00-11:30 AM

Pampa Area Cancer Support Group

100 W 30th Ave

Pampa, TX 79065

806- 663-5566

www.prmctx.com

4th Tuesday

6:00 PM

Pampa Regional Medical Center Cafeteria

Hereford Regional Medical Center

801 E. 3rd St

Hereford, TX  79045

806-364-2141

2nd Monday of each month

6:30-7:30

806-364-2121 ext 3370

Breast Cancer Support

www.Bcsupport.org

Network of Strength

2BME

www.2bme.org

Anderson Network

800-345-6324

www.mdanderson.org

Medicine World

Texas Oncology

Susan G. Komen

www.komen.org

Mastectomy Products

Advanced Limb and Brace

1900 S Coulter St # E

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-351-1775

The Woman's Personal Health Resource Inc.

877-463-1343

Breast Forms

800-734-1886    

www.Breastform.com

Nearly You Mastectomy Products

866-722-6168

www.nearlyyou.com

Tender Loving Care

800-850-9445

www.tlcdirect.org

Me Again Breast Prosthesis Boutique

Amarillo, TX

806-358-7851

Wigs

Feke Wigs

www.fekewings.com

Best Wig Outlet

www.bestoutlet.com

Hairpieces for Women

www.headcovers.com

Affordable Wigs

1201 Buchanan Street

Amarillo TX  79107

806-372-3541

Evilene's Wigs & Accessories

3701 Plains Blvd

Amarillo TX  79102

806-331-4247

G-Bob's Wigs

3801 Olsen Blvd

Amarillo TX  79109

806-352-1601

Merle Norman Cosmetics

3440 Bell St.

Amarillo, TX 79109

806-352-1022

American Cancer Society

3915 Bell St

Amarillo, TX  79109

877-227-1618

www.cancer.org

Hair Club for Men & Women

6900 West Interstate 40

Amarillo, TX  79106

806-353-4247

Financial Assistance

AVONCares Program for Medically Underserved Women

800-813-4673

www.cancercare.org

National Cancer Institute

www.cancer.gov

Coverage for All-Healthcare Coverage

800-234-1317

www.coverageforall.org

University Medical Center

806-775-9045

Medicaid Hotline

800-422-6237

www.cms.hhs.gov

Medicare Hotline

800-633-4227

Patient's Advocate Foundation's Co-Pay Relief Program

866-512-3861

Health Well Foundation Financial Assistance

800-675-8416

Partnership for Prescription Assistance

888-477-2669

www.pparx.org

Prescription Assistance for Drug Companies

Abbott Laboratories Prescription Assistance

800-444-4106

www.abbott.com

Astra Zeneca Prescription Assistance

800-292-6363

www.astrazeneca.com

Aventis Sanofi-Aventis Prescription Assistance

888-477-2669

www.sanofi-aventis.us

Bayer Prescription Assistance

800-998-9180

www.bayer.com

Biogen Idec Prescription Assistance

800-456-2255

Boehringer Ingelheim Prescription Assistance

800-556-8317

Bristol-Meyers Squibb Prescription Assistance

212-546-4000

www.bms.com

Forest Laboratories Prescription Assistance

800-951-07