doc.: ieee 802.11-09/0674r0 submission june 2009 bruce kraemer, marvell; adrian stephens, intel...
TRANSCRIPT
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
Date: 2009-06-25
Name Company Address Phone email
Adrian Stephens Intel Corporation
15 JJ Thompson Avenue,
Cambridge CB3 0FD UK
+1 (503) 616-3800
Bruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane,
Santa Clara, CA 95054 +1 (321) 427-4098
Jon Rosdahl CSR 10871 N 5750 W
Highland, UT 84003 +1 (801) 492-4023
Authors:
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Introduction
• Revision 0 of this document is preliminary, reflecting the status as of 2009-06-25 after the fourth recirculation ballot. Any greyed-out sections will be filled in the final version of this document.
• This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee in support of a request for approval to send IEEE P802.11n to RevCom.
• Document (11-09/0674r<tbd>) was approved during the closing plenary session of the 802.11 working group on <date>.– Passed in the Task Group <result>– Passed in the Working Group <result>
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11n
Draft Opened Closed Days Ballot Type
Pool
22 with4 w/o
26 with4 w/o
41 with4 w/o
42 with4 w/o
45 with4 w/o
233171 19% 172nd Recirc
277 7%D9.0 3/20/2009 4/4/2009 81%
D10.0 5/15/2009 5/30/2009 15 3rd Recirc
277 190 237 86%
Approve Disapprove Abstain Return
88% 12% 17 7%
84%
D8.0 2/19/2009 3/6/2009 15 1st Recirc
277
15
232 83%169 80% 20% 17
30 New 277
7%
7%D7.0 12/11/2008 1/10/2009 224 80%158 78% 22% 17
D11.0 6/5/2009 6/20/2009 15 4th Recirc
277 195 90% 86%10% 17 7% 238
Key:
•“with” = “with comments”
•“w/o” = “without comments”
QTY % QTY %QTY % QTY %
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Updated resolution of the 20/40 MHz in 2.4 GHz comments
• Prior to completion of comment resolutions in the May 2009 802.11 session (Montreal, Canada), many of the comments relating to the 20/40MHz in 2.4 GHz topic were rejected by the comment resolution committee.
• During the May session, a compromise was worked out, including active participation from the comment resolution committee and those voting “no” on this topic. Significant changes were incorporated into D10.0
• As a result, resolutions of 81 comments from the initial ballot and 16 comments from the first recirculation ballot were re-written (replacing a “disagree” with an “accept in principle”).
• The updated resolutions form the basis of the analysis in the rest of this document.
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Comments by Ballot
Key:
•SB0 = Initial sponsor ballot. SB1 = 1st recirculation ballot, etc.
•Coordination: comment supplied by a Mandatory coordination entity
•Not Required: comment indicated as not required to satisfy voter
•Satisfied: comment required to satisfy voter that is indicated as satisfied either by the voter indicating satisfaction with the specific comment, or by voting yes in a subsequent ballot
•Known Unsatisfied: a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has indicated they are unsatisfied with the comment resolution.
•Assumed Unsatisfied: comment not meeting any of the above criteria – i.e., a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has not responded when asked about their satisfaction with the comment resolution.
Sponsor Ballot
Not Required Coordination Satisfied
Known Unsatisfied
Assumed Unsatisfied
Grand Total
0 78 112 14 37 2411 45 1 19 2 10 772 7 1 9 8 3 283 11 1 1 3 4 204 6 1 8 15
Grand Total 147 4 141 27 62 381
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Mandatory coordination
Coordination Entity Draft Date Status
IEEE-SA Editorial (MEC)
D9.0D10.0D11.0
March 09May 09June 09
“Meets all editorial requirements. “
Quantities, Units and Letter Symbols
(SCC14)
D8.0 February 09 “OK”
Terms and Definitions (SCC10)
No response
Registration Authority Committee (RAC)
Not required
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Note
• In subsequent slides, “Unsatisfied comments” includes both “Known Unsatisfied” and “Assumed Unsatisfied” comments.
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Unsatisfied Comments
The table shows the count of unsatisfied editorial comments and technical comments separately. The comments are then classified into:
•A – Accepted. The comment was accepted and the change indicated by the commenter was approved.
•P – Accepted in Principle. The comment was accepted in principle, but a different change to the one indicated by the commenter was approved.
•D – Disagree. The comment was declined and no change to address the comment was approved.
•U – Unresolvable.
•S – Out of Scope.
Sponsor Ballot A P D U S Grand Total0 1 37 11 2 511 3 9 122 5 5 1 113 1 2 4 74 4 2 1 1 8
Grand Total 2 51 31 4 1 89
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 9
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Unsatisfied comments by commenter
Commenter A P D U S Grand TotalChu, Liwen 1 10 4 1 16
Epstein, Joseph 1 14 15Worstell, Harry 8 2 10Allen, James 5 1 1 7Chaplin, Clint 1 4 1 6Hach, Rainer 3 3Sherlock, Ian 3 3
Coward, Helge 3 3Fikstvedt, Oddgeir 3 3
Chalfin, Edward 3 3Roine, Per Torstein 3 3Petranovich, James 2 2
Bagby, David 1 1 2Lin, John 2 2
Santhoff, John 2 2Brubk, Sverre 2 2Walter, Udo 2 2
Kinney, Patrick 2 2Bourgeois, Monique 1 1
Xhafa, Ariton 1 1Reede, Ivan 1 1Grand Total 2 51 31 4 1 89
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Unsatisfied Comments by TopicTopic A P D U S Grand Total
20/40 Coex in 2.4GHz 37 6 43Minor Technical 4 4 8
Protection Mechanisms 2 4 1 7Editorial 1 4 1 6
Feature set 5 5MAC/PHY Coupling 4 4
Denial of Service 3 3IP 3 3
20/40 Coex in 5GHz 2 2OBSS Scanning 2 2Rate selection 2 2Power Saving 1 1
Block Ack 1 1Duration rules 1 1
PSMP 1 1Grand Total 2 51 31 4 1 89
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 11
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Unsatisfied comments
• The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the comment resolution committee received during P802.11n sponsor ballotis attached. – Double click on the icon to the right to
open this.
• A copy of this same data presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached. – Double click on the embedded .pdf to
the right to open this.
Microsoft Excel Worksheet
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 12
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
Note
• Having filled in the blanks, the following slide will be brought to motion in the July EC meeting.
June 2009
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Submission
802.11 EC Motion – Approval to send P802.11n to RevCom
• Grant approval, to forward P802.11n Draft 11.0 to RevCom.
• P802.11n had a 90% approval on the last Recirculation Sponsor Ballot. There are 22 disapprove voters representing 98 unsatisfied comments.– Working Group vote on the Motion Passed: <for> y, <against> n,
<abstain> a
• Moved: Bruce Kraemer 2nd: <tbd>– Yes No Abstain