doc.: ieee 802.11-04/913r4 submission september 2004 slide 1 ieee 802.11n phy motorola ht partial...
TRANSCRIPT
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 1Submission
IEEE 802.11n PHY Motorola
HT Partial Proposal
Alexandre Ribeiro Dias, Stéphanie Rouquette-Léveil, Markus Muck, Marc de Courville, Jean-Noël Patillon,
Sébastien Simoens, Karine Gosse,
Keith Blankenship, Brian Classon
Motorola Labs
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 2Submission
Overview
• Overall goal and key features of proposal
• Turbo Codes
• Multiple-Antenna schemes
• OFDM modulator and data rates
• Preamble definitions
• Simulation results
• Hardware complexity estimation
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 3Submission
Overall goal of the proposed PHY design
Modification of IEEE 802.11a-1999 PHY in order to provide new OFDM PHY modes meeting the IEEE802.11n PAR with:
• High spectrum efficiency for achieving target performance with increased data rates
– Data streams transmitted in parallel using multi-antenna transceivers– Optimized multi-carrier modulation with lower overhead– Enhanced forward error correction schemes
• Improved link budget for lower to medium data rates– Providing the IEEE802.11a PHY data rates with increased range/link quality– Adapted to the support of services requiring small packet size such as VoIP– Exploit multi-antenna capabilities for robust transmission modes– Turn gains in spectral efficiency into link budget advantages
• Favored short term implementation and deployment with robust, low complexity techniques
– Open-loop multi-antenna solutions: simple, robust and without protocol overhead (feedback signalization)
– Improve operation in limited Outdoor environments with support of long channel impulse responses
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 4Submission
Key features (1/2)
• Multi-antenna extension:– MIMO with at least 2Tx/2Rx antennas scaling up to 4Tx– Support for asymmetric antenna configurations to accomodate
various classes of devices– Open-loop modulation technique
• Second OFDM modulator (optional):– 2 bandwidths supported: 20MHz and 40MHz– Optionally 128 carriers in 20/40MHz with 104 data carriers, and
guard interval of 32 samples• 8% PHY rate increase for 20MHz mode• 117% PHY rate increase for 40MHz mode vs 20MHz/64-carriers
• Turbo Codes: Increase roubustness
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 5Submission
Key features (2/2)
• New nPLCP preambles for MIMO support(same for 64- and 128-point IFFT/FFT)
• High order modulation (optional): 256-QAM
• Space/frequency interleaver
• Compatibility to legacy systems:– IEEE 802.11a convolutional code with code rates 1/2, 2/3, 3/4 and
5/6
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 6Submission
Turbo Codes: Motivation
• Stable, well-understood technology• Good performance• Block size and code rate flexibility
– Padding can be used to reduce number of interleavers– Puncturing patterns simple to describe and implement
• Incremental redundancy procedures easily defined• Highly parallelizable “parallel window” decoder architecture
– Easily scaled to meet latency requirements• Motorola 2048-bit information block implementation benchmark of 10s
per iteration on 2001-era FPGA scales to 1.25s per iteration on current technology ASIC with clock rate increase and window size decrease
– Interleavers can be parallelized to avoid memory contentions without performance penalty
• Known intellectual property landscape
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 7Submission
Coding Functional Description
scramb-ling
paddinginsertion
segment-ation
turboencoding
paddingremoval
puncturing
repeated for each segment
SE
RV
ICE
+ P
SD
U
. . .
code blocksto OFDM
modulator
• Scrambling before padding insertion– Before decoding, receiver may insert large LLRs at known locations
• Padding– Inserts minimum number of zeros to make block size multiple of 512 bits– Zeros are inserted uniformly across the SERVICE+PSDU at the ends of
256-bit sub-blocks– Turbo interleaver maps padding to odd-numbered positions in second
encoder
• Segmentation– Breaks padded sequence into 2048-bit segments plus at most one segment
of length 512, 1024, or 1536 bits
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 8Submission
Turbo Encoder
• Rate-1/3 3G turbo code polynomials– Code rates 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, and 5/6 can be
achieved exactly through puncturing
• Contention-free turbo interleavers– Performance nearly identical to WCDMA
down to 104 frame error rates
• Constituent encoders left unterminated– Helps preserve exact code rate
– Negligible performance degradation
D D D
D D D
X
Y1
constituent encoder 1
constituent encoder 2
Y2
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 9Submission
Contention-Free Interleavers• Inter-window shuffle (IWS) interleaver
i = output position(i) = input position() = bit reversal intra-window permutation (same for all windows)(j) = {0(j),1(j),,M1(j)} = j-th permutation of {0,1,,M1} (periodic)
M = number of windows (2,4,6,8 for block size 512,1024,1536,2048, resp.)
window 0
W
(j) = {2,0,...,1}
j j+W
(j) (j)+W
(j)+2W
(j)+
(M 1)W
window 0
window 1
window 1
window 2
window 2
window M 1
window M 1
j+2W
j+(M
1)W
256mod256256modρ 256 iii i
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 10Submission
Non-Termination Performance• 8-th iteration static binary channel FER with IWS
interleavers (no tail compared with full 12-bit tail)
• Non-termination helps preserve exact code rate with negligible performance impact
512-bit block 2048-bit block
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 11Submission
Padding Removal• To preserve code rate, all padding bits and
associated parity bits (i.e., on same trellis step) are removed prior to puncturing
constituentencoder
1
constituentencoder
2
turbointerleaver
zero-padded information block
turbo encoder
known zero bit
unknown parity bit associated with known zero bit
KEY
removed padding
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 12Submission
Multi-antenna aspects of the proposal
• Transmission of 1, 2 or 3 parallel streams using: – Space-Time Block Coding (STBC), Spatial Division Multiplexing (SDM) or robust
hybrid solutions (STBC/SDM) optimize the rate vs link budget trade-off
• 2, 3 or 4 transmit antennas– The number of receive antennas determines the maximum number of spatial
streams that can be transmitted.– The capability of decoding 2 parallel data streams is mandatory – all the devices have to be able to decode all the modes where the number of spatial
streams is lower or equal than the number of receive antennas in the device. – It is required for a device to exploit all its antennas in transmission even for
optional modes.• 2 or more receive antennas
– With STBC or STBC/SDM, asymmetric antenna configurations can be supported• Importance of configurations in which NTx ≠ NRx
– NTx > NRx e.g. between AP and mobile handset (in DL)– NTx < NRx e.g. between MT and AP (UL), or if MT have upgraded multi-antenna
capabilities compared to AP (infrastructure upgrade cost)
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 13Submission
T r a n s m is s io n o f 3 s p a t ia l s t r e a m s( S D M )
T r a n s m is s io n o f 2 s p a t ia l s t r e a m s( S T B C )
*2s 1s
*1s 2s*4s 3s
*2s 1s
*1s 2s*4s 3s
s p a t ia l s t r e a m # 1
s p a t ia l s t r e a m # 2
*2s 1s
*1s 2s*4s 3s
*2s 1s
*1s 2s*4s 3s
s p a t ia l s t r e a m # 1
s p a t ia l s t r e a m # 2
s p a t ia l s t r e a m # 1
s p a tia l s t r e a m # 2
s p a tia l s t r e a m # 3
1s
3s
2sspatial stream #1
spatial stream #2
1sspatial stream #1
spatial stream #2 2s
Transmission of 2 spatial streams(SDM)
spatial stream #1
*2s 1s
*1s 2s
spatial stream #1
*2s 1s
*1s 2s
*2s 1s
*1s 2s
Transmission of 1 spatial stream(STBC)
Transmission of 3 spatial streams(STBC)
Transmission of 2 spatial streams(STBC)
spatial stream #1
spatial stream #2
spatial stream #3
*4s
*6s
*2s 1s
*1s 2s
3s
5s
spatial stream #1
spatial stream #2
spatial stream #3
*4s
*6s
*2s 1s
*1s 2s
3s
5s
spatial stream #1
spatial stream #2
*2s 1s
*1s 2s
*4s 3s
*3s 4s
*2s 1s
*1s 2s
*2s 1s
*1s 2s
*4s 3s
*3s 4s
2 transmit antenna schemes proposed 3 transmit antenna schemes proposed
4 transmit antenna schemes proposed
Asymmetric Modes for a robust hybrid solution
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 14Submission
OFDM modulation • 1st OFDM modulation based on IEEE802.11a parameters:
– 48 data subcarriers, 64-point IFFT/FFT, 20MHz Bandwidth 180Mbps maximum PHY rate (120Mbps mandatory)
• 2nd OFDM modulation (optional extension):– 104 data subcarriers, 128-point IFFT/FFT, 8 pilots, 20MHz Bandwidth 195Mbps maximum PHY rate
• 3rd OFDM modulation (optional extension):– 128-point IFFT/FFT, 40MHz Bandwidth– 104 data subcarriers, 8 pilots – Guard interval duration: 0.8s – 234Mbps maximum PHY rate
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 15Submission
28838483/4256QAM2144Mbps
24028865/664QAM2120Mbps
21628863/464QAM2108Mbps
19228862/364QAM296Mbps
14419243/416QAM272Mbps
24028865/664QAM160Mbps
19228862/364QAM148Mbps
14419243/416QAM136Mbps
9619241/216QAM124Mbps
729623/4QPSK118Mbps
489621/2QPSK112Mbps
244811/2BPSK16Mbps
Data bits/ symbol (NDBPS)
Coded bits/ symbol (NCBPS)
Coded bits per subcarrier per stream (NBPSC)
Coding rate (R)
ModulationNumber of
spatial streams (NS)
Data rate (Mbits/s)
Mode: 2-TX
48 carriers20MHz
62483283/4256QAM2156Mbps
52062465/664QAM2130Mbps
46862463/464QAM2117Mbps
41662462/364QAM2104Mbps
31241643/416QAM278Mbps
52062465/664QAM165Mbps
41662462/364QAM152Mbps
31241643/416QAM139Mbps
20841641/216QAM126Mbps
15620823/4QPSK119.5Mbps
10420821/2QPSK113Mbps
5210411/2BPSK16.5Mbps
Data bits/ symbol (NDBPS)
Coded bits/ symbol (NCBPS)
Coded bits per subcarrier per stream (NBPSC)
Coding rate (R)
ModulationNumber of
spatial streams (NS)
Data rate (Mbits/s)
Mode: 2-TX
104 carriers20MHz
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 16Submission
Mode: 2-TX
104 carriers40MHz
Mode: 3/4-TX
48 carriers20MHz
Data rate (Mbits/s)
Number of spatial streams
(NS)
Modulation Coding
rate (R)
Coded bits per
subcarrier per
stream (NBPSC)
Coded bits per OFDM symbol (NCBPS)
Data bits per OFDM symbol (NDBPS)
Number of data
subcarriers (NSD)
13Mbps 1 BPSK 1/2 1 104 52 104 26Mbps 1 QPSK 1/2 2 208 104 104 39Mbps 1 QPSK 3/4 2 208 156 104 52Mbps 1 16QAM 1/2 4 416 208 104 78Mbps 1 16QAM 3/4 4 416 312 104
104Mbps 1 64QAM 2/3 6 624 416 104 130Mbps 1 64QAM 5/6 6 624 520 104 156Mbps 2 16QAM 3/4 4 416 312 104 208Mbps 2 64QAM 2/3 6 624 416 104 234Mbps 2 64QAM 3/4 6 624 468 104 260Mbps 2 64QAM 5/6 6 624 520 104 312Mbps 2 256QAM 3/4 8 832 624 104
Data rate (Mbits/s)
Number of spatial streams
(NS)
Modulation Coding
rate (R)
Coded bits per
subcarrier per
stream (NBPSC)
Coded bits per OFDM symbol (NCBPS)
Data bits per OFDM symbol (NDBPS)
Number of data
subcarriers (NSD)
12Mbps 2 BPSK 1/2 1 48 24 48 24Mbps 2 QPSK 1/2 2 96 48 48 36Mbps 2 QPSK 3/4 2 96 72 48 48Mbps 2 16QAM 1/2 4 192 96 48 72Mbps 2 16QAM 3/4 4 192 144 48 96Mbps 2 64QAM 2/3 6 288 192 48
120Mbps 2 64QAM 5/6 6 288 240 48 144Mbps 3 64QAM 2/3 6 288 192 48 162Mbps 3 64QAM 3/4 6 288 216 48 180Mbps 3 64QAM 5/6 6 288 240 48 216Mbps 3 256QAM 3/4 8 384 288 48
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 17Submission
Mode: 3/4-TX
104 carriers20MHz
Mode: 3/4-TX
104 carriers40MHz
Data rate (Mbits/s)
Number of spatial streams
(NS)
Modulation Coding
rate (R)
Coded bits per
subcarrier per
stream (NBPSC)
Coded bits per OFDM symbol (NCBPS)
Data bits per
OFDM symbol (NDBPS)
Number of data
subcarriers (NSD)
13Mbps 2 BPSK 1/2 1 104 52 104 26Mbps 2 QPSK 1/2 2 208 104 104 39Mbps 2 QPSK 3/4 2 208 156 104 52Mbps 2 16QAM 1/2 4 416 208 104 78Mbps 2 16QAM 3/4 4 416 312 104
104Mbps 2 64QAM 2/3 6 624 416 104 130Mbps 2 64QAM 5/6 6 624 520 104 156Mbps 3 64QAM 2/3 6 624 416 104
175.5Mbps 3 64QAM 3/4 6 624 468 104 195Mbps 3 64QAM 5/6 6 624 520 104 234Mbps 3 256QAM 3/4 8 832 624 104
Data rate (Mbits/s)
Number of spatial streams
(NS)
Modulation Coding
rate (R)
Coded bits per
subcarrier per
stream (NBPSC)
Coded bits per OFDM symbol (NCBPS)
Data bits per
OFDM symbol (NDBPS)
Number of data
subcarriers (NSD)
26Mbps 2 BPSK 1/2 1 104 52 104 52Mbps 2 QPSK 1/2 2 208 104 104 78Mbps 2 QPSK 3/4 2 208 156 104
104Mbps 2 16QAM 1/2 4 416 208 104 156Mbps 2 16QAM 3/4 4 416 312 104 208Mbps 2 64QAM 2/3 6 624 416 104 260Mbps 2 64QAM 5/6 6 624 520 104 312Mbps 3 64QAM 2/3 6 624 416 104 351Mbps 3 64QAM 3/4 6 624 468 104 390Mbps 3 64QAM 5/6 6 624 520 104 468Mbps 3 256QAM 3/4 8 832 624 104
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 18Submission
OFDM Parameters Overview (I/2) Parameter Value
NSD: Number of data subcarriers 48 NSP: Number of pilot subcarriers 4 NST: Number of subcarriers, total 52 (NSD+NSP) F: Subcarrier frequency spacing 0.3125MHz (=20MHz/64)
TFFT: IFFT/FFT period 3.2s (1/F) TGI: GI duration 0.8s
TSYM: Symbol interval 4s (TGI +TFFT)
Parameter Value NSD: Number of data subcarriers 104 NSP: Number of pilot subcarriers 8 NST: Number of subcarriers, total 112 (NSD+NSP) F: Subcarrier frequency spacing 0.15625MHz (=20MHz/128)
TFFT: IFFT/FFT period 6.4s (1/F) TGI: GI duration 1.6s
TSYM: Symbol interval 8.0s (TGI +TFFT)
• 20MHz• 48 Carriers
• 20MHz• 104 Carriers
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 19Submission
OFDM Parameters Overview (II/2)
Parameter Value NSD: Number of data subcarriers 104 NSP: Number of pilot subcarriers 8 NST: Number of subcarriers, total 112 (NSD+NSP)
F: Subcarrier frequency spacing 0.3125MHz (=40MHz/128) TFFT: IFFT/FFT period 3.2s (1/F)
TGI: GI duration 0.8s TSYM: Symbol interval 4.0s (TGI +TFFT)
• 40MHz• 104 Carriers
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 20Submission
Frequency and space interleaver
• IEEE802.11a based frequency interleaver defined for both 48 and 104 data subcarriers
• Spatial division: – NSD : number of data subcarriers
NSD-symbol-cyclingAcross NS streams stream #0
stream #1
stream # NS-1
Spatialfrequencysymbol
interleaving
interleaved stream #1
interleaved stream #2
interleaved stream # NS-1
Spacetime
encoding
NSD-symbol-cyclingAcross NS streams stream #0
stream #1
stream # NS-1
Spatialfrequencysymbol
interleaving
Spatialfrequencysymbol
interleaving
interleaved stream #1
interleaved stream #2
interleaved stream # NS-1
Spacetime
encoding
Spacetime
encoding
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 21Submission
nPLCP preamble (I/2)• n S T S
– E a c h S T S 1 , … , S T S 1 0 c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e l e g a c y s h o r t t r a i n i n g d e f i n e d o v e r i n d e x e s - 2 8 , 2 8
S - 2 8 , 2 8 = { 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , - 1 - 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , - 1 - 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 + 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 + 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 + 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 + 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 + 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , - 1 - 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 + 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , - 1 - 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , - 1 - 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 + 1 j , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 }
– D u r a t i o n o f t h e n S T S s h o r t t r a i n i n g s e q u e n c e : 1 0 × 0 . 8 = 8 µ s .
S T S 1 S T S 2 S T S 3 S T S 4 S T S 5 S T S 6 S T S 7 S T S 8 S T S 9 S T S 1 0
n S T S
S T S 1 S T S 2 S T S 3 S T S 4 S T S 5 S T S 6 S T S 7 S T S 8 S T S 9 S T S 1 0S T S 1 S T S 2 S T S 3 S T S 4 S T S 5 S T S 6 S T S 7 S T S 8 S T S 9 S T S 1 0
n S T S
• n L T S
• E a c h L T S 1 , L T S 2 i s b a s e d o n t h e l e g a c y l o n g t r a i n i n g , b u t d e f i n e d o v e r i n d e x e s - 2 8 , 2 8 :L - 2 8 , 2 8 = { 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , - 1 , - 1 , 1 , 1 , - 1 , 1 , - 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , - 1 , - 1 , 1 , 1 , - 1 , 1 , - 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 0 , 1 , - 1 , - 1 , 1 , 1 , -1 , 1 , - 1 , 1 , - 1 , - 1 , - 1 , - 1 , - 1 , 1 , 1 , - 1 , - 1 , 1 , - 1 , 1 , - 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , - 1 , - 1 }
• D u r a t i o n o f t h e n L T S l o n g t r a i n i n g : 1 . 6 + 2 × 3 . 2 = 8 µ s
G I 2 L T S 1 L T S 2
n L T S
G I 2 L T S 1 L T S 2
n L T S
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 22Submission
nPLCP preamble (II/2)• Overview on different frame structures:
IEEE802.11a OFDM Frame STS LTS SIG D1 D2
IEEE802.11g OFDM Frame STS LTS SIG D1 D2 EXT
IEEE802.11n OFDM Frame, NTX = 2
nSTS nLTS nLTS
nSTS + CS nLTS + CS nLTS + CS
A1:
A2:nSIG nD1 nD2
IEEE802.11n OFDM Frame, NTX = 3
nSTS nLTS nLTS
nSTS + CS nLTS + CS nLTS + CS
A1:
A2: nSIG nD1 nD2
nSTS nLTS (-1) x nLTSA3:
IEEE802.11n OFDM Frame, NTX = 4
nSTS nLTS nLTS
nSTS + CS nLTS + CS nLTS + CS
A1:
A2:nSIG nD1 nD2
nSTS nLTS (-1) x nLTSA3:
nSTS + CS nLTS + CS (-1) x nLTS + CSA4:
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 23Submission
Simulation results
• AWGN, TGnB, TGnD, TGnE channel comparisons for 20MHz Bandwidth
• Essential points– Throughput increase with optional modes (FFT-128) at
constant SNR requirements in AWGN channels
– Robust modes based on STBC for good coverage and support of asymetric configurations
– Unilateral modification of number of antennas in TX and RX can be exploited Useful for independent evolution of AP/MT
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 24Submission
Simulation results - AWGN
• 2TX/2RX to 4TX/4RX configuration and SNR ~21dB:120Mbps 180Mbps (130Mbps 195Mbps)
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 25Submission
Simulation results - TGnB
• Diversity gain for all streams• 120 Mbps lowers SNR ~ 36dB 28dB 24.5dB
XXX 42dB 34dB180
10dB 7dB 6dB12
20dB 16dB 14dB48
32dB 24dB 21dB96
36dB 28dB 24.5dB120
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/
Mbps
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 26Submission
Simulation results - TGnB
• For new schemes: Same behaviour is observed for diversity modes as for classical schemes
• Clear improvements for 2 streams from 2x2 3x3 mode• Clear improvements for 3 streams from 2x2/3x3 4x4
mode
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 27Submission
Simulation results - TGnB
• # TX antennas < # RX antennas e.g. Update of MT
26.5dB120
5dB12
16dB48
24dB96
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/Mbps
31.5dB120
11dB12
20dB48
28dB96
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/Mbps
• # TX antennas > # RX antennas e.g. Update of AP
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 28Submission
PHY Throughput Analysis – TGnB
• Link adaptation is based on long term average SNR sub-optimum inferior bound
• Finer grid possible with more modes
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 29Submission
Simulation results - TGnD
• Diversity gain for all streams• 120 Mbps lowers SNR ~ 35dB 25.5dB 23dB
XXX 36dB 29dB180 (effect)
XXX 36dB 29dB180
5dB 4.5dB 3.5dB12
18dB 14dB 11dB48
27.5dB 21dB 19dB96
35dB 25.5dB 23dB120
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/
Mbps
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 30Submission
Simulation results - TGnD
• # TX antennas < # RX antennas e.g. Update of MT
24dB120
2dB12
14.5dB48
20dB96
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/Mbps
30dB120
7dB12
17dB48
25.5dB96
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/Mbps
• # TX antennas > # RX antennas e.g. Update of AP
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 31Submission
PHY Throughput Analysis – TGnD
• Link adaptation is based on long term average SNR sub-optimum inferior bound
• Finer grid possible with more modes
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 32Submission
Simulation results - TGnE
• Diversity gain for all streams• 120 Mbps lowers SNR ~ 37dB 26.5dB 24dB
XXX 43dB 31dB180
7dB 5dB 4dB12
19dB 15dB 12dB48
30dB 22.5dB 20dB96
37dB 26.5dB 24dB120
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/
Mbps
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 33Submission
Simulation results - TGnE
• # TX antennas < # RX antennas e.g. Update of MT
25dB120
4dB12
15dB48
21.5dB96
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/Mbps
31.5dB120
9dB12
18dB48
26.5dB96
SNR for PER=10-1Mode/Mbps
• # TX antennas > # RX antennas e.g. Update of AP
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 34Submission
PHY Throughput Analysis – TGnE
• Link adaptation is based on long term average SNR sub-optimum inferior bound
• Finer grid possible with more modes
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 35Submission
Simulation results – TGnD/TGnE• Similar to TGnB:
– 2Tx:• Diversity gain for 1 stream, but not for 2 streams• 120 Mbps requires SNR ~ 35dB (TGnD) 37dB (TGnE)
– 3Tx:• Diversity gain for 2 streams, but not for 3 streams• 120 Mbps lowers SNR:
– ~ 36dB 26dB (TGnD)– ~ 37dB 26.5dB (TGnE)
– 4Tx:• Diversity gain for all streams• 120 Mbps lowers SNR
– ~ 36dB 26dB 23dB (TGnD)– ~ 37dB 26.5dB 24dB (TGnD)
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 36Submission
Simulation results – Offset compensation
• No significant impact at 10% PER in channel E (NLOS)
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 37Submission
Simulation results – Offset compensation
• Impact of carrier frequency offset and symbol clock offset at SNR=50dB in channel E (LOS):– Small degradation of the PER performance– High data rate modes are more impacted:
• PER (+40ppm) = 112/100xPER (0ppm) at 48Mbps• PER (+40ppm) = 163/100xPER (0ppm) at 120Mbps
Antenna configuration
Data rate (Mbits/s)
PER whencarrier offset
= -40ppm
PER when carrier offset
= 0ppm
PER whencarrier offset =+40ppm
2x2 12Mbps 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002
2x2 48Mbps 0.0016 0.0016 0.0018
2x2 96Mbps 0.0039 0.0037 0.0042
2x2 120Mbps 0.0297 0.0183 0.0298
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 38Submission
Simulation results – Offset compensation
Antenna configura
tion
Data rate (Mbits/s)
PER when
carrier offset = -40ppm
PER when carrier offset = 0ppm
PER whencarrier offset =+40ppm
3x3 12Mbps 0.0002 0.0001 ~0
3x3 48Mbps 0.0006 0.0006 0.0005
3x3 96Mbps 0.0041 0.0041 0.0043
3x3 120Mbps 0.0043 0.0045 0.0050
3x3 180Mbps 0.0963 0.0617 0.0974
Antenna configura
tion
Data rate (Mbits/s)
PER when
carrier offset = -40ppm
PER when carrier offset = 0ppm
PER whencarrier offset =+40ppm
4x4 12Mbps ~0 ~0 ~0
4x4 48Mbps 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
4x4 96Mbps 0.0016 0.0016 0.0019
4x4 120Mbps 0.0021 0.0021 0.0022
4x4 180Mbps 0.0023 0.0024 0.0029
• High data rate modes are less impacted if spatial diversity:– 3x3: PER (+40ppm) = 158/100xPER (0ppm) at 180Mbps– 4x4: PER (+40ppm) = 121/100xPER (0ppm) at 180Mbps
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 39Submission
Implementation complexity8 0 2 . 1 1 n 8 0 2 . 1 1 a / gC 1 . 2 5 CT X G a t e s T X G a t e s
T G n T X i m p l e m e n t a t i o n r e q u i r e s s o m e c o m p l e x i t y f o r S T i n t e r l e a v i n g .
8 0 2 . 1 1 n 8 0 2 . 1 1 a / gC 2 . 0 CR X G a t e s R X G a t e s + T u r b o D e c o d e r
T G n R X i m p l e m e n t a t i o n w i l l t y p i c a l l y l e a d t o a p a r a l l e l i z e d M a x i m u m -L i k e l i h o o d d e c o d e r a n d M M S E b a s e d s e p a r a t i o n a u f p a r a l l e l s t r e a m s ( h i g h e r c o m p l e x i t y r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r i t e r a t i v e i n t e r f e r e n c e c a n c e l l a t i o n a l g o r i t h m s ) .
8 0 2 . 1 1 n 8 0 2 . 1 1 a / g/ /C 3 . 3 . . . . 4 . 3 CT X R X M I P S T X R X M I P S
T G n c a l c u l a t i o n p o w e r r e q u i r e m e n t s a p p r o x i m a t e l y s c a l e w i t h t h e o u t p u t d a t a r a t e s ( i . e . u p t o 4 . 3 x f o r f a s t e s t o p t i o n a l m o d e ) .
8 0 2 . 1 1 n 8 0 2 . 1 1 a / g/ /C CT X R X f i l t e r i n g T X R X f i l t e r i n g N o a d d i t i o n a l f i l t e r i n g c o n s t r a i n t s a r e
e x p e c t e d f o r T G n i m p l e m e n t a t i o n s .
8 0 2 . 1 1 n 8 0 2 . 1 1 a / g/ /C 2 . 5 CT X R X c l o c k r a t e T X R X c l o c k r a t e
D e p e n d i n g o n t h e l e v e l o f a r c h i t e c t u r a l p a r a l l e l i z a t i o n , t h e c l o c k r a t e i s e x p e c t e d t o b e a p p r o x . 2 . 5 x h i g h e r .
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 40Submission
Conclusion
• Proposal: MIMO extension of IEEE802.11a addressing– Short term implementation needs through mandatory
modes relying on a mix of STBC and SDM
– Take into account device size constraints allowing asymmetric TX/RX antenna configuration independent upgrade of APs / MTs possible
– Enable PHY throughput covering 54Mbits/s 180 (468) Mbps
September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/913r4
Slide 41Submission