doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 1 5GSG Hilton Head, South Carolina March 12-15, 2001 doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 2 General Guidelines IP If you know about patents or patent applications that are (or may be) required to implement the standards then be aware that the IEEE does have a patent policy Submissions Conform to Templates (on web, on flash card) Submit prior to presentation (if at all possible) No Logos on submissions Document numbers available from vice chair Harry Worstel (or Secretary) Roberts Rules of Order apply to meeting procedures Available on IEEE web and flash Voting Status Anyone can vote in Study Group In plenary, only voting members can approve motions doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 3 5 GHZ GLOBALIZATION STUDY GROUP Meeting Objectives Hilton Head March 12-15, 2001 Review the results and actions from ETSI-BRAN#22 Review the results and actions from 5GWIAG meetings in Stockholm & Hilton Head Review technical proposals for near term Interworking mechanism Discuss PAR and 5 Criteria for elevation of J5GSG to Task Group within Thursday 802 ExCom via WG Plenary Discuss mechanism for creating proposed 5GPP to create single global standard Establish plans for BRAN#23 and subsequent meetings doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 4 doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 5 AM PM TuesdayWednesdayThursday 5GSG - Near term Critical Action Items & Deadlines Plenary 13:00 15:00 Vote on PAR & 5 Criteria Life extension of 5GSG 10:30 12:00 Votes on PAR & 5 Criteria Life extension of 5GSG 5GPP & MOA Call for proposals 13:00-15:00 Julius Knapp - FCC PAR & 5 Criteria 5GPP & MOA 10:30 12:00 Agenda, Minutes, Roll PAR* & 5 Criteria* Life extension of 5GSG 5GPP* & MOA* Prepare for Julius Eve 20:00-23:00 Review proposals Finalize docs for voting Timeline Complete any open items Prepare for plenary votes Prepare for Excom Review proposals Prepare for next meetings doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 6 doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 7 Tuesday AM 10:30 12:00 Agenda Minutes from Monterey and BRAN#22 History Overview & Introduction Life extension of 5GSG PAR* & 5 Criteria* as drafted Improve & Finalize Prepare questions for Julius 5GPP* & MOA* introduction doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 8 Meetings Partial List Only How best to conduct business and make progress in a multinational context? Must address at least Coordinated Documentation numbering system Coordinated Meetings and Logistics among BRAN/IEEE802.11/MMAC IEEE (Jan 12-15, Monterey, CA) 5GWIAG (Feb 6 in Stockholm) H2GF (Feb 21-23, Frankfurt, Germany) IAG (March 11, Hilton Head, SC) IEEE (March 12-15, Hilton Head, SC) BRAN#23 (April 3-6, Sophia Antipolis, France) 5GWIAG (May 13 Orlando?) IEEE (May 14-18, Orlando, FL) H2GF (May 15-16, Princeton, NJ) BRAN#24 (June 26-29, Sophia Antipolis, France) IEEE (July 9-13, Portland, OR) IEEE (September 10-14, Sydney, Australia) H2GF (September 11-13, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) BRAN#25 (September 18-21, Sophia Antipolis, France) IEEE (November 12-16, Austin, TX) H2GF (November 20-21, ?) BRAN#26 (December 4-7, Sophia Antipolis, France) doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 9 Standards Convergence Steps InterferenceCoexistenceInterworkingSingle Global Standard 2 standards 1 standard Current standardsChanges in standard(s) to remove destructive interference [whether different or same channels] Changes in standard(s) to remove obstacles to data sharing [beyond interference], but without going to a single global standard New standard Current StateProposals (date) Standard (date) Proposals (date) Standard (date) Proposals (date) Standard (date) Assumption: This will also apply to MMAC doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 10 Standards Convergence Steps InterferenceCoexistenceInterworkingSingle Global Standard 2 standards 1 standard Harmful interference (2 standards) Communicating devices using a or HiperLAN2 can not operate in the same coverage area without harmful interference Communicating devices using a or HiperLAN2 can not exchange data. Level-1: Operation in the different channels (e.g. DFS, TPC) Communicating devices using a or HiperLAN2 can operate in the same coverage area by using different channels. Any Wireless Terminal can talk to any AP that is multi-mode, but with two radios. Level-1: Wireless Terminal of one standard can exchange data with an AP of another standard Communicating devices may not exchange QoS and other aspects. Any wireless terminal can talk to any AP or any Wireless Terminal Communicating devices using a or HiperLAN2 can exchange data directly on ad- hoc basis Level-2: Operation in the same channel Communicating devices using a or HiperLAN2 can operate in the same coverage area using a standardized mechanism that enables devices of both types to efficiently share the same channel. Any Wireless Terminal can talk to any AP that is multi-mode, but with one radio. N/A Assumption: This will also apply to MMAC doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 11 Regulatory Convergence Steps Allowing a in Europe DCS/TPC (TGh) a would have to add the upper part of the band when talking about DFS, not just the lower 200 MHz portion of the Band It is unclear whether there is a 2nd step needed for a to be classified as a HiperLAN2 Currently, ERC calls out HiperLAN1 and HiperLAN2 as defined by ETSI as the legal standards in Europe, but not certain how this could be interpreted Need to write a test specification for a for certifying the radio Allowing HiperLAN2 in US The band allocation in the US is limited, so the HiperLAN2 solution would have to limit itself to operate in the US-allocated frequency bands In the lower 100MHz, the US power limit is lower than in Europe Spectrum Harmonization doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 12 Hybrid MAC/DLC H2 PHY 11a PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge Hybrid PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge H2 CL MAC Bridge Hybrid MAC/DLC/CL MAC Bridge 11a PHY 11 MAC Bridge H2 PHY H2 DLC H2 CL MAC Bridge Hybrid PHY Hybrid PHY Hybrid PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge MAC/DLC Convergence Layer Implementation Issue (2 radios) Interwork Single Global Standard Now Interwork Single Global Standard Choose one step in gray parts Convergence Progression doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 13 HL2 MT Ch2 Internet AP HL2 AP Coexistence Level 1 - Using different channels in the same coverage area Data exchanged between the devices using the backbone (each device communicates with its Access Point) STA Ch1 11a PHY 11 MAC Bridge H2 PHY H2 DLC H2 CL MAC Bridge Corporate/Public Scenario - 1 doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 14 HL2 MT Ch1 Internet AP STA Ch1 HL2 AP Coexistence Level 2 - Using the same channel in the same coverage area Data exchanged between the devices using the backbone (each device communicates with its Access Point) 11a PHY 11 MAC Bridge H2 PHY H2 DLC H2 CL MAC Bridge Corporate/Public Scenario - 2 doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 15 HL2 MT Ch1 Internet Unified AP 2 different MACs STA Ch1 Coexistence Level 2 - Using the same channel in the same coverage area Data exchanged between the devices using the backbone Each device communicates with the Unified Access Point but to a different MAC entity. Each MAC has a different address Hybrid PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge MAC/DLC Convergence Layer Corporate/Public Scenario - 3 Interworking 1 (one AP) doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 16 HL2 MT Ch1 Internet Unified AP Unified Dual MAC STA Ch1 Coexistence Level 2 - Using the same channel in the same coverage area Data exchanged between the devices using Layer 2 of the AP Only one MAC address is used Hybrid MAC/DLC H2 CL MAC Bridge Hybrid PHY Corporate/Public Scenario - 4 Hybrid PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge MAC/DLC Convergence Layer OR Interworking 1 (one MAC) doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 17 HL2 CC Internet Gateway a STA Ch HL2 MT HL2 PHY H2 DLC+HE 1394 CL 1394 Appl. HL2 PHY H2 DLC+HE 1394 CL 1394 Appl. 11a PHY Ethernet Appl. 11 MAC Ch1 Dual Mode Device Home Scenario Bringing Laptop In Acting CC Point Coordinator Hybrid PHY H2 DLC+HE Ethernet CL Ethernet Appl. 11 MAC 1394 CL 1394 Appl. HL2 MT HL2 PHY H2 DLC Ethernet CL Ethernet Appl. Coexistence Level 2 - Using the same channel in the same coverage area Control HL2 User Data Control 11a doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 18 5GHz Standardization Roadmap IEEE a (wireless Ethernet) IEEE e/f/h (QoS, Security, DFS/TPC,..) BRAN-HL/2 (wireless ATM, IP) Home Profile Joint SG Requirements Coexistence Inter-working Spectrum single global standard HE phase2 UMTS - interworking Public Access Inter- working Standards Revisions 5GWIAG MMAC also participating 5GPP Partnership Project (BRAN/IEEE/ MMAC) IW additions IW additions Today doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 19 The Partners have agreed to co-operate in the production of globally applicable Technical Specifications and Technical Reports for a 3rd Generation Mobile System The Project is called the "Third Generation Partnership Project" and may be known by the acronym "3GPP". doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 20 IEEE SA ETSI Secretariat ARIB IEEE 802 ETSI BRAN HiSWAN Wireless Ethernet HL2 Organization Structures 5GPP Approval Levels MMAC doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 21 Tue13: SG 5 GHzGlobal 5 GHz Std Tue18:30GeneralTutorial (see below) Tue20: TGh5 GHzSpectrum management Wed08:30GeneralRegulatory group Wed11: GHz Co-existence Wed13: /15Joint meeting Wed15:00Standards Board and IEEE staff Wed16:00leave for airport Tutorial, Tuesday, 18:30-20: Title: FCC's Spread Spectrum rules Presented by: Mr. Julius Knapp, Chief of Policy and Rules, Federal Communications Commission Summary: Mr. Knapp will make a presentation on the current FCC spread spectrum rules, pending issues, and steps the FCC is considering to make the rules more flexible. Julius Knapp schedule - FCC Chief of Policy & Rules doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 22 Recent Accomplishments & Future Steps Joint 5GHz Globalization Study Group (5GSG) approved in BRAN#22 Plenary Feb 02, 2001 Support to create a Partnership Project for global convergence of 5GHz WLAN standards received in BRAN#22 plenary Feb 02, 2001 Proposing the idea to 5GWIAG meeting in Stockholm for 5GHz industry commitment Feb 06, 2001 Starting a formal communication with IEEE and MMAC regarding Partnership Project Alignment of approval of 5GSG To make the best use of the current approval procedure IEEE : individual based (one member one vote) ETSI BRAN (HiperLAN2): company based (weighted vote) MMAC: company based (not weighted) doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 23 Memorandum of Agreement Jim Carlo has asked for a draft one page Memorandum of Agreement between the IEEE and ETSI BRAN regarding the formation of the 5GPP. Action Item: Bruce Kraemer & Jamshid Khun-Jush doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 24 Julius Knapp - Questions It would be of commercial benefit to harmonize the use of the radio spectrum in the 5 GHz band. The following questions are relevant to that goal. 1. Europe spectrum allocations for WLAN in the 5 GHz band include 5.47 to What is the forecast for allocation of that band to WLAN in the US? 2. Europe requires the use of Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) and Transmit Power Control (TPC) for the HIPERLAN/2 WLAN in the 5 GHz band. This was concession to the primary users of the band, satellite and radar operators,to mitigate interference. Currently there is no such requirement in the US.Should we expect such a regulation to be imposed in the future? If there is pressure to impose DFS and TPC might the imposition of such a rule be triggered by ITU and WRC decisions in 2003 or might we expect an FCC rule change prior to WRC? 3. Europe and the US specify different transmit power limits for the 5 GHz bands, for example 5.15 to 5.25 GHz. FCC rules were written, in part, in consideration of MSS feeder concerns. Might the US power limit of 50mW be increased if the DFS and TPC mentioned in item 2 above were applied? 4. FCC Report and Order 97-5 and Memorandum & Order address rules for use of the U-NII bands. Are there any actions pending or expected that would modify the rules as published? 5. If the interests of standards bodies (such as the IEEE, ETSI & MMAC) and commercial equipment manufacturers were better served by world wide harmonization of the spectrum usage rules in the 5 GHz band, what would the FCC propose would be the most productive path to achieving that goal? 6. Use of the band from to is doubly defined by U-NII and ISM. How should we decide which set of rules applies? doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 25 PAR and 5 Criteria Draft documents were prepared in Monterey PAR doc 01/xxx 5 Criteria doc 01/yyyyyy These must be refined and approved by 5GSG Must be posted on server Tuesday afternoon Then it can be brought to /15 joint plenary on Wednesday for vote If not approved Wednesday, fix and return to vote on Thursday afternoon doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 26 Call for Proposals IEEE Study Groups can issue call for applications and call for proposals These submissions can be used to back up the PAR and 5 Criteria These proposals can be discussed and refined However, when it is formed, the Task Group must re-issue the call for proposals doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 27 5GSG/IEEE Milestone Timeline Promotion of Study Group to TG March Approval of PAR and 5 Criteria May JulyPromotion of 5GSG to TG SeptemberClose of Call for proposals SeptemberBaseline of proposed changes for plenary approval November Modifications ready for sponsor ballot 5GPP March Concept socialized MayOrganization details presented JulyCreation of 5GPP by IEEE SeptemberClose of Call for proposals NovemberCreation of 5GPP by IEEE November Completion of doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 28 PAR Schedule July 2001 Issue Drafts of Proposal Selection Process, Functional Requirements, Evaluation Criteria as a Task Group Issue Call For Proposals for PHY and MAC PHY: Modifications of a MAC: Modifications of MAC Mar 2002 Decision on specific modifications July 2002 First Tentative Draft Standard submitted for review Sept 2002 Comment Resolutions Nov 2002 Comment Resolutions Mar 2003 Submit to RevCom SCHEDULE doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 29 Web Page Currently missing from web-site. Will be added ASAP. Volunteers to Format? doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 30 5GSG Documents Available on /338 00/ /428 00/ /31 01/ /67 01/ / /103PAR 01/104.5 Criteria 01/107 doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 31 Motions: Proposed that we extend the 5GSG to the next plenary. Proposed that we accept the 5 Criteria document (xxx) and present it for approval by the plenary. Proposed that we accept the PAR document (xxx) and present it for approval by the plenary. Proposed that we approve the proposal to create a 5GPP as a vehicle for establishing a single global. Proposed that we accept the draft IEEE/ETSI 5GPP MOA for presentation to the plenary and to open dialog with 802 SE. doc.: IEEE /161r1 Submission March 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 32 Orlando Meeting Objectives Work toward single converged standard Joint session of: IEEE a, ETSI BRAN HIPERLAN/2, MMAC Discuss coexistence goals Review activities from ETSI BRAN #23 Review contributions from 5GWIAG Purpose, Scope Definitions, Acronyms Application Scenarios, Requirements Future meeting events Consider steps to move to TG status