[doc 518] 8-29-2014 d motion to continue
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
1/80
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 13-10200-GAO)
DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Defendant, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, by and through counsel, respectfully moves to
continue the trial in this case to a date on or after September 1, 2015.
Introduction
The trial in this case is currently scheduled to begin just 16 months after the
defendant was indicted. This 16-month period is one-halfthe median preparation time
that federal courts have allowed defendants on trial for their lives over the past decade,
and would bring this case to trial faster than 103 of the 119 federal capital trials to get
underway since 2004.
We recognize that the government and many members of the public, especially in
the Boston area, may want the trial to begin quickly. But it is critically important that
any trial be fair, which means giving both sides, not just the government, enough time to
uncover and present all relevant evidence. Despite defense counsels best efforts, the
accelerated trial schedule has outpaced the requirements of so complex a case. A
substantial continuance therefore is necessary in order to secure the defendants rights to
due process of law, the effective assistance of counsel, and an individualized and non-
1
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ & 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
2/80
arbitrary capital sentencing determination under the Fifth, Sixth and Eighth
Amendments.
In summary, the reasons justifying a reasonable continuance are as follows:
1. The normal challenges to investigating potential mitigating factors
in a high-profile capital case have been enormously increased and the
investigation has been hobbled and slowed by barriers of distance,
language, and culture, among many others.
2. The sheer scope of the law enforcement investigation of the
Marathon bombing, and the massive amount of testimonial, physical,
digital and expert evidence that it has generated, have overwhelmed the
ability of defense counsel to evaluate and respond to the governments case
in the time allotted. This already enormous challenge has beenexacerbated by the governments slow, inconsistent and disorganized
production of discovery material, and by its long-delayed and abstruse
expert disclosures, which have diverted defense time and resources, caused
needless litigation, and impeded defense preparation for trial.
3. Domestic defense mitigation investigation has been conducted amid
a growing atmosphere of anxiety and agitation generated by highly-
publicized arrests, indictments, prosecutions, deportations (and, in one
instance, the FBI killing) of members of Dzhokhar and Tamerlan
Tsarnaevs peer groups. The investigation has been further hampered byaggressive FBI follow-up tracking and questioning of potential witnesses,
as well as by the unrelenting attention of the news media. As a result, the
most basic defense investigative work of contacting and interviewing
witnesses who possess important information has been unusually time-
consuming and laborious.
In combination, these three extraordinary problems have created a situation in
which the defense cannot be prepared adequately to test the governments case, nor to
present the defendants own evidence in mitigation of sentence, by the current trial date
of November 3. Given the vital importance to the defendant and to the community that
any decision to impose the death sentence be, and appear to be, based on reason rather
2
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ - 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
3/80
than caprice or emotion, Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349, 357 (1977), it would be
constitutionally intolerable to adhere to any trial schedule that would allow time for only
the governments side to be fully heard.
A. The current trial schedule is unusually fast compared to the normal practice
in the federal courts.
There can be no uniform answer to the question of how much time is needed to
prepare the defense of a capital case for trial, since each case differs in many ways from
every other. But before turning to the reasons why the defense in this case cannot be
expected to be ready for trial by November 3, it is instructive to establish a framework
based on the actual experience of the federal courts throughout the nation.
The main reason that we cannot be ready for a trial beginning on November 3 is
the governments decision to seek the death penalty. The threat of the death penalty
exponentially increases the issues and evidence that the defense must investigate and
prepare for. This is true of capital cases generally, not just this one. It is the reason why
capital cases almost always take longer to prepare and try.
To be sure, most federal capital cases are resolved by negotiated guilty pleas
leading to sentences of life imprisonment without possibility of release, rather than by
adversarial trials by jury. However, since January 1, 2004, we are aware of 150 federal
capital defendants who have proceeded to trial with the government seeking imposition
of the death penalty. SeeExhibit A, Declaration Of Kevin McNally Regarding Pre!Trial
Preparation Time (August 29, 2014). In these 150 federal cases that have actually
reached trial, district courts have allowed the defendants an averageof approximately 36
3
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ ( 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
4/80
months preparation time between indictment and the start of trial. Id. The mediantime-
to-trial has been 32 months.Id. In this case, by contrast, the period between the
defendants indictment on June 27, 2013, and the current trial date of November 3, 2014
is just over 16 months one-half of the median pretrial period, and a mere 44 percent of
the time allowed in the average defendants case.1
In a previous declaration filed four months before the government announced its
intention to seek the death penalty in this case, the defendant advised the Court that data
collected for the vast majority of the 493 defendants against whom the Attorney General
had authorized the death penalty showed the average interval between indictment and the
trial date to be 28 months. SeeDeclaration of Kevin McNally Regarding Pre!Trial
Preparation Time, DE 107-2 (filed Sept. 27, 2013). Though much longer than the 16-
month pretrial period currently in effect here, this 28-month figure significantly
understated the amount of pretrial preparation time generally allowed in the federal
courts, because roughly half of these defendants cases ended without trial, mainly
through plea bargains for life-without-release sentences. SeeExhibit E, Federal Death
Penalty Resource Counsel Project, The Federal Death Penalty (Aug. 28, 2014). Thus, it
cannot be known whether those cases would actually have begun trial on the dates
reflected on the dockets. By contrast, the 36-month average and the 32-month median
1An alphabetical listing of all 150 defendants known to have begun capital trials since
January 1, 2004 is provided as Exhibit B. We also have provided a spreadsheet arranging
these 150 defendants by the number of months that elapsed between their indictments and
the start date of their trials. SeeExhibit C. Exhibit D arranges this same data by trial
rather than by defendant, and reflects that a total of 119 separate capital trials have
commenced during the period since January 1, 2004.
4
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ ? 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
5/80
reflected in Exhibit A encompass only those cases with unquestionably real trial dates
because all of those trials actually got underway on the dates listed. We have also
focused on the last decade so as to best reflect current practice.2
We do not suggest that the trial schedule in this case should be dictated by the
schedules adopted in all of the federal capital trials over the past decade, or by any other
single consideration. But in deciding whether a given trial schedule allows the defense
too little time to prepare, the contemporary practices of all of the federal courts
throughout the nation provide a valuable baseline for comparison. Such a comparison
shows that this case is on a very fast track to trial. Indeed, if the case actually starts trial
on November 3, it will rank as the sixteenth-fastest federal capital case to reach trial out
of 119 such trials since 2004,see Exhibit D, and the pretrial preparation time permitted
the defendant will be less than that afforded 127 of the 150 individual defendants who
have stood trial in those cases. See Exhibit C. In considering the particular reasons why
the defense in this case needs more time to prepare, we submit that the Court can and
should give due regard to the overall record and practices of the federal courts on this
important question.
B. The legal standard.
The law governing appellate review of rulings on motions for continuance is well-
established. A half-century ago, the Supreme Court set forth these broad governing
2The 2004 start point is also appropriate because it encompasses the entire period since
the Supreme Court underscored defense counsels constitutional obligation to conduct an
in-depth social history investigation in capital cases in Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510
(2003).
5
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ 7 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
6/80
principles:
The matter of continuance is traditionally within the discretion of the
trial judge, and it is not every denial of a request for more time that
violates due process even if the party fails to offer evidence or is
compelled to defend without counsel. A myopic insistence uponexpeditiousness in the face of a justifiable request for delay can
render the right to defend with counsel an empty formality. There
are no mechanical tests for deciding when a denial of a continuance
is so arbitrary as to violate due process. The answer must be found in
the circumstances present in every case, particularly in the reasons
presented to the trial judge at the time the request is denied.
Ungar v. Sarafite, 378 U.S. 575, 598-99 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord,
United States v. Delgado-Marrero, 744 F.3d 167 (1st Cir. 2014). To be sure, because
each case issui generis, United States v. Saccoccia, 58 F.3d 754, 770 (1st Cir. 1995),
appellate rulings on claims that trial courts abused their discretion in denying
continuances provide only limited guidance to a trial judge seeking to exercise
discretion fairly. That said, the First Circuit has listed these general factors governing
appellate review of denials of continuance:
A reviewing court must look first at the reasons contemporaneously
presented in support of the request for the continuance. See United States
v. Lussier, 929 F.2d 25, 28 (1st Cir.1991). Other relevant factors may
include such things as the amount of time needed for effective preparation,
the amount of time actually available for preparation, the amount of time
previously available for preparation and how assiduously the movant used
that time, the extent to which the movant has contributed to his perceived
predicament, the complexity of the case, the availability of assistance from
other sources, the probable utility of a continuance, the extent ofinconvenience to others (such as the court, the witnesses, and the opposing
party) should a continuance ensue, and the likelihood of injustice or unfair
prejudice attributable to the denial of a continuance.
Saccoccia, 58 F.3d at 770.
6
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ C 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
7/80
A few of these factors may be dealt with at the outset. Because this motion is
made sufficiently in advance of trial, before jurors or witnesses have been summoned
(and indeed before the Court has determined the venue for trial), granting a continuance
now is unlikely to cause any substantial inconvenience to the Court, the witnesses, or the
government. As the Court is already aware, and as will be discussed in additional detail
below, the complexity of the case is obviously great. And while the amount of time
needed for effective preparation can never be calculated with precision, the fact that
much more preparation time is normally afforded in far less complex federal death
penalty cases across the United States weighs in favor of a finding that more time is
required for the defense to be effectively prepared. It is also important that this is the
defendants first request to continue the trial date, and that the case has not previously
been continued. ContrastUnited States v. Maldonaldo, 708 F.3d 38 (1st Cir. 2013)
(upholding denial of ninth continuance in order to allow third substitution of retained
defense counsel). Ultimately, however, the question raised by this motion must be
decided by considering the reasons . . . presented in support of the continuance.
Saccoccia, 58 F.3d at 770. The following reasons touch on each of the remaining
Saccoccia factors and militate in favor of a continuance.
C. The reasons why a continuance is warranted
1. Overseas mitigation investigation. The first of these challenges the
impossibility of investigating the life history of a youthful suspect in just 16 months when
so much of the evidence must be sought across barriers of language, culture and
suspicion in conflict-torn regions of Chechnya, Dagestan, and Central Asia is
7
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ D 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
8/80
described in detail in an sealed ex partesubmission that accompanies this motion. The
reasons why this filing must be made under seal is explained in a separate pleading.
Suffice it to say here that public disclosure of the circumstances surrounding the defense
investigation in this case would greatly exacerbate the already-formidable obstacles that
counsel face.
2. The volume of potentially relevant evidence. The second extraordinary
feature of this case is its sheer size. The Boston Marathon bombing has been investigated
by more than 1,000 FBI and other agents from additional federal, state, and local law
enforcement agencies, by an inter-agency task force representing the entire United States
Intelligence Community, and by at least five separate committees of the United States
Congress. The government has gradually produced some 6.7 terabytes of discovery,
including more than 100,000 pages (over 10,500 documents) of witness statements,
reports, photographs, and scientific tests produced in scanned formats; thousands of items
of physical evidence; and perhaps most daunting of all thousands of gigabytes of
digital evidence derived from a large and steadily-growing array of personal computers,
cellular telephones, portable hard drives and other digital storage devices, internet web
sites, and social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and the Russian-language
Odnoklassniki. Most recently, the governments continuing expert disclosures were
accompanied by more than 90 gigabytes of additional data, including more than 110,000
non-Bates-stamped files contained in 10,000 unindexed folders.3
3Even these dizzying statistics understate the magnitude of the discovery and other
disclosures received so far. Much of the 6.7 terabytes of discovery was provided in
8
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ 8 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
9/80
In a non-capital case, where the only question to be resolved is the defendants
factual guilt or innocence of the crimes charged in the indictment, defense counsel might
safely ignore much of this tsunami of evidence and information, and limit their attention
to the relatively narrow (albeit still massive) categories of evidence bearing directly on
whether the defendant helped perpetrate the offenses alleged. But in a capital case, the
issues bearing on the issue of sentence are much broader. In this case, for example, they
include the apportionment of responsibility between the defendant and his plainly
dominant older brother. Pursuing this single question and there are many others like it
requires that the defense identify and classify thousands of items of circumstantial
evidence contained in each of the brothers various computers and digital storage devices
so as to show precisely when, and in which direction, violent ideological material cited in
the indictment flowed between them. The government has already indicated that it plans
to call two FBI specialists in computer forensics and the management of digital
information to provide the prosecutions answers to these questions, but has yet to
provide any hint of precisely what evidence they intend to use from the digital devices or
what they intend to say about them. In a declaration filed along with this motion, the
defense has explained how laborious and time-consuming is the task of independently
analyzing this vast body of digital evidence, what remains to be done, and why the work
compressed files; we do not know (and have not used scarce time to find out) the volume
in terabytes those files proved to be, collectively, once unzipped. Likewise, to pick out
just one of many such examples, a single scanned page of the more than 100,000 pages
referred to above, Bates No. DT-0015743, bearing the title Discovery Photography
Drive, is actually a scanned picture of a hard drive which itself contains 24,558 separate
photo and video files in 794 folders.
9
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ > 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
10/80
could not have been completed in the relatively short time allotted so far. See Exhibit F,
Declaration of William Fick.
Nor may the defense ignore the vast quantity of discovery bearing on the impact of
the Marathon bombings on the victims and the wider Boston community. Given the
governments repeated claims that the bombing was one of the most effective and
devastating terrorist crimes in recent U.S. history, and its recent disclosure that it will
seek to prove at sentencing the likely traumatic impact of the bombing and its aftermath
on countless thousands of Boston children and youth, defense counsel would fail to
fulfill their constitutionally-mandated role unless they fully evaluated both these claims
and the vast array of evidence on which they are based. See generallyGardner v.
Florida, 430 U.S. 349, 362 (1977) (due process violated by death sentence that was
imposed, at least in part, on the basis of information which [the defendant] had no
opportunity to deny or explain);Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (2005) (defense
counsels failure to review court file that they knew would be used in aggravation of
sentence denied capital clients Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of
counsel). There is, in short, very little in this truly massive array of documentary, digital,
physical and expert evidence that the defense can safely disregard without examination.
For the foregoing reasons, this case would have proven too massive for the
defense to be prepared for a November 3 trial and the capital sentencing proceeding that
may follow even had government adopted a more cooperative approach to discovery.
But as exemplified by recent litigation regarding the governments inadequate and
untimely expert disclosures, the already-formidable obstacles have been compounded by
10
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &, 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
11/80
the government's needless delays, disorganized data dumps, and its recurrent practice of
requiring the defense to litigate (at considerable cost in time and effort) our entitlement to
evidence (such as Tsarnaev family A-files, FBI interviews, and expert disclosures), only
to turn around months later and provide the information anyway, sometimes without
comment or explanation, in the midst of some new massive round of disclosures.
Countless FBI lab reports that were completed a year ago or more are only now being
disclosed, with the result that our deadlines for responding to and challenging the vast
array of scientific and technical evidence in this case have been needlessly compressed
into the last two months before the current trial date of November 3.4 Leaving aside
whether the government has complied with its minimum discovery obligations, it might
have been expected to do better than this after pressing successfully for such an early trial
date. In any event, the governments actual performance in managing the discovery and
expert disclosures in this case provides yet another reason why this massive case simply
cannot be fairly brought to trial in less than half the time of the average federal capital
prosecution.
3. The impact of a growing atmosphere of fear on the mitigation
investigation.
In addition tothe unusual obstacles created by distance, language, culture, and the
huge scale of the law enforcement investigation in this case, the defense mitigation
investigation within the United States has been hampered by continuing arrests,
4A description of some of the challengesand time requirementsinvolved in
reviewing and evaluating the governments scientific and technical evidence as it has
been provided in this case is contained in the declaration of Frederick Whitehurst,
attached hereto as Exhibit G.
11
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ && 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
12/80
prosecutions, and other law enforcement activity focused on those close to the Tsarnaevs
and the community in which they lived. By its very nature, this is an impediment that
can never be quantified with certainty, because witnesses who are too intimidated to talk
to us about our client or about his brother Tamerlan, for example, also are likely to be too
intimidated to tell us why. But it is undeniable that the period between the defendants
arrest on April 19, 2013 and the present has been marked by a succession of highly-
publicized arrests, deportations, federal criminal prosecutions, and even one killing of
former friends and acquaintances of both Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Most of
those targeted have been foreign nationals who inevitably fear deportation regardless of
whether criminal charges are ever brought or proven against them. The sequence of
events includes the following:
May 1, 2013.Azamat Tazhayakov and Dias Kadyrbayev, two Kazakh nationals
and college friends of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are arrested and later convicted of
obstruction of justice and conspiracy in connection with their handling of certain
of the defendants belongings. Tazhayakov was convicted by a jury on July 21,2014, and Kadyrbayev pled guilty on August 21, 2014. The prosecutions of both
men continue to be highly publicized throughout the Boston area.
May 1, 2013.Robel Phillipos, Dzhokhars high school and college friend, is
arrested and charged along with Tazhayakov and Kadyrbayev with making false
statements to the FBI. Philliposs trial is set to begin on September 29, 2014.
May 22, 2013. Ibragim Todashev, a friend of Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Tamerlans
suspected accomplice in a 2011 murder of three men in Waltham, Massachusetts,
is shot to death by an FBI agent during questioning at Todashevs Floridaapartment.
May 30, 2014. Another friend of Tamerlan, Khairullozhon Matanov, is arrested
and charged with obstruction of justice and making false statements to the FBI.
He is currently being held without bond.
12
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &- 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
13/80
May 30, 2014. Konstantin Morozov, a friend of Tamerlan, is arrested and jailed
pending deportation, despite a pending appeal on his asylum application. The
arrest reportedly followed Morozovs refusal of an FBI request to wear a wire
while speaking to yet another of Tamerlans Chechen friends.
July 22, 2014. Stephen Silva, a high school and college friend of Dzhokhar, isarrested on federal drug and gun possession charges. Law enforcement sources
immediately leak the allegation that Silva provided the gun named in the
indictment to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, and that the same gun was later used to kill
MIT police officer Sean Collier. Silva is currently being held without bond.
In addition to these public arrests and prosecutions, the defense is aware of other
acquaintances of the Tsarnaevs who have been detained and placed in deportation
proceedings. Others with lawful immigration status have been detained for hours and
required to surrender their electronic devices upon re-entry to the United States.
To be clear, we do not to question the governments motives in pursuing criminal
or immigration violations. Rather, we list these subsequent cases and law enforcement
activities simply to make the intuitively obvious point that as such arrests, prosecutions,
deportations, and detentions increase, members of the Tsarnaevs peer groups inevitably
come to feel that any sort of cooperation with the defense investigation will risk attracting
attention from law enforcement and immigration authorities. Many of the witnesses who
are most necessary to the mitigation investigation are also most vulnerable to fear of law
enforcement reprisal. These include Dzhokhar Tsarnaevs high-school and college
friends and classmates, his fellow athletes, and members of the Chechen, Russian and
Muslim communities in Boston. These difficult circumstances are compounded by a
continuing pattern of aggressive FBI re-interviewing of potential witnesses on
13
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &( 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
14/80
occasion within hours of an attempted contact by a defense investigator. And all of this
is occurring under the glare of unrelenting news media coverage.
To be sure, patient, time-intensive work with a few of these potential witnesses
has gradually secured some degree of cooperation. But in such a generalized atmosphere
of fear, where any sort of cooperation with the defense (as opposed to the FBI or the
prosecution) reasonably appears to carry great personal risk, it is taking the defense much
longer than normal to carry out the most basic investigative task of interviewing the
defendants friends, peers and acquaintances. And this in turn constitutes another reason
why this case has proven to be a poor candidate for a much faster-than-usual trial
schedule.
D. Other factors weighing in favor of continuance.
There are several other factors which support, even if they do not independently
compel, a continuance that would put this case on a pace closer to that of the great
majority of federal death penalty trials. These include:
Continuing leaks and outright advocacy in the news media on the part of current or
recently-retired members of law enforcement have exacerbated already high levels
of prejudice among the potential jury pool, and further diverted defense time and
attention into efforts ineffective so far to prevent recurrence.
As the government has argued in opposing the defendants request for a change of
venue, there is authority for the proposition that the prejudicial impact of pretrial
publicity tends to lessen over time. DE 512 at 14-16. To the extent that the
government is correct, the prejudicial impact of the undeniably massive publicity
14
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &? 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
15/80
surrounding the Boston Marathon bombing (and the more recent follow-on arrests
and prosecutions of several of the Tsarnaev brothers friends) will tend to decrease
if this case were placed on a more typical pace to trial.
If the defendant is convicted of the capital counts against him, the current trial
schedule is likely to result in the jurys beginning sentencing deliberations around
the time of the second anniversary of the bombing (April 15, 2015), an event
which can be expected to produce an intense surge of highly emotional publicity
that could threaten the fairness of the proceedings.
We cannot overemphasize that this motion does not ask that Mr. Tsarnaev be
treated differently than other federal capital defendants. Rather, we are asking that he
notto be treated differently, and that he not be given far less time to prepare for trial
than is typically allowed in much less complex federal capital cases.
REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d), the defendant requests that this motion be set for
oral argument. Counsel believe that argument may assist in the Court in resolving the
important issue raised by the motion.
Dated: August 29, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
DZHOKHAR TSARNAEVby his attorneys
/s/ Judy Clarke
Judy Clarke, Esq. (CA Bar # 76071)
CLARKE & RICE, APC
1010 Second Avenue, Suite 1800
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 308-8484
15
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &7 2B &C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
16/80
David I. Bruck, Esq.
220 Sydney Lewis Hall
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) [email protected]
Miriam Conrad, Esq. (BBO # 550223)
Timothy Watkins, Esq. (BBO # 567992)
William Fick, Esq. (BBO # 650562)
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE
51 Sleeper Street, 5th Floor
(617) 223-8061
[email protected] [email protected]
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent
electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing
(NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on
August 29, 2014.
/s/ Judy Clarke
16
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &C 2B &C
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
17/80
EXHIBIT A
Declaration of Kevin McNally
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)& 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ & 2B C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
18/80
!"#$%&%'()* ), -".(* /0*%$$1
&"2%&!(*2 3&"4'&(%$ 3&"3%&%'()* '(/"
"#
$ %&''()*+, -('.( /- *0( 12'(%*3' 34 *0( 5(6('/+ 1(/*0 7()/+*, 8(-3&'%(
93&)-(+ 7'3:(%*; /--2-*2)< %3&'*=/>>32)*(6 /)6 6(4()6(' /**3')(,- %0/'2*/+ %/-(- 2) *0( 4(6('/+ %3&'*-# $ 0/.( -('.(6 /- 8(-3&'%( 93&)-(+
-2)%( *0( 2)%(>*23) 34 *0( 8(-3&'%( 93&)-(+ 7'3:(%* 2) @/)&/',; "AAB# C0( 7'3:(%* 2-
4&)6(6 /)6 /6D2)2-*('(6 &)6(' *0( 9'2D2)/+ @&-*2%( E%* F, *0( 1(4()6(' G('.2%(-
H442%( 34 *0( E6D2)2-*'/*2.( H442%( 34 *0( I)2*(6 G*/*(- 93&'*-#
B# J, '(->3)-2F2+2*2(- /- 4(6('/+ '(-3&'%( %3&)-(+ 2)%+&6( *0( D3)2*3'2)< 34
/++ 4(6('/+ %/>2*/+ >'3-(%&*23)- *0'3&'(>/'(6 F, *0( G&F%3DD2**(( 3) 5(6('/+ 1(/*0 7()/+*, 9/-(-; 93DD2**((
3) 1(4()6(' G('.2%(-; @&62%2/+ 93)4('()%( 34 *0( I)2*(6 G*/*(-;
???#&-%3&'*-#()/+*,M"9HNO8#0*D#C0( G&F%3DD2**(( '(>3'* P&''(-()*/*23) 2) 6(/*0 >()/+*, %/-(- ####S !"#/* TU# E '(%()* &>6/*( *3 *0(
8(>3'* -*/*(6V PJ/), :&63L( ?2*0 />>'(%2/*23) /)6
/6D2'/*23) /F3&* *0( ?3'L 34 8(-3&'%( 93&)-(+# @&60/-2R(6 *0(2' /--2-*/)%("
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)& 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ - 2B C
http://www.uscourts.gov/dpenalty/1COVER.htm.http://www.uscourts.gov/dpenalty/1COVER.htm.http://www.uscourts.gov/dpenalty/1COVER.htm. -
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
19/80
$) 3'6(' *3 %/'', 3&* *0( 6&*2(- ()*'&-*(6 *3 D(; $ D/2)*/2) / %3D>'(0()-2.(
+2-* 34 4(6('/+ 6(/*0 >()/+*, >'3-(%&*23)- /)6 2)43'D/*23) /F3&* *0(-( %/-(-# $
/%%3D>+2-0 *02- F, 2)*(')(* )(?- -(/'%0(-; '(.2(?2)< 63%L(*-; /)6 63?)+3/62)+(/62)('-3) 2)*('.2(?- ?2*0 6(4()-( %3&)-(+; /)6
%3)-&+*/*23) ?2*0%0/DF('-# C02- 2)43'D/*23) 2- '('3-(%&*23)- 0/- F(() '(+2(6 &>3) F, *0(
E6D2)2-*'/*2.( H442%( 34 *0( I)2*(6 G*/*(-93&'*-; F, *0( 5(6('/+ @&62%2/+ 9()*(';
/)6 F, ./'23&- 4(6('/+ 62-*'2%* %3&'*-#
X#8(-3&'%( %3&)-(+ %3++(%* %3D>'(0()-2.( /)6 /%%&'/*( 6/*/ %3)%(')2)(%242% /--2-*/)%(
2)./+&/F+(#S
0**>VMM???#&-%3&'*-#>32)*D()*H493&)-(+M7&F+2%/*23)-MI
> 6/*(5(6('/+1(/*07()/+*,9/-(-#/->Q
B
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)& 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ ( 2B C
http://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/AppointmentOfCounsel/Publications/Up%20dateFederalDeathPenaltyCases.aspxhttp://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/AppointmentOfCounsel/Publications/Up%20dateFederalDeathPenaltyCases.aspxhttp://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/AppointmentOfCounsel/Publications/Up%20dateFederalDeathPenaltyCases.aspxhttp://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/AppointmentOfCounsel/Publications/Up%20dateFederalDeathPenaltyCases.aspxhttp://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/AppointmentOfCounsel/Publications/Up%20dateFederalDeathPenaltyCases.aspx -
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
20/80
>'(*'2/+D2+(-*3)(- /)6 *'2/+ /)6 D2*22*/+ %/-(- 0/.(
/%*&/++, %3DD()%(6 *'2/+ -2)%( @/)&/', "; BUUX# E )&DF(' 34 *0(-( %/-(- 2).3+.(6
*?3 3' D3'( %/>2*/+ %3=6(4()6/)*-Y /- / '(-&+*; *0( "TU 6(4()6/)*-W %/-(-
'(>'(-()* / *3*/+ 34 ""A *'2/+-#B
Z# C0( /.('/>'3Q2D/*(+, [Z#T D3)*0-#
\# C0( D(62/) *2D( F(*?(() 2)62%*D()* /)6 *0( *'2/+ 6/*( 43' *0( "TU
4(6('/+ %/>2*/+ 6(4()6/)*- ?03 /%*&/++, F(
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
21/80
"U# $) 3'6(' *3 6(*('D2)( ?0(*0(' *0(-( *2D(=*3=*'2/+ %/+%&+/*23)- ?('( 34
*'2/+- 34 e&'(/& 34 7'2-3) 2)D/*(- 43' D&'6('- %3DD2**(6 ?02+( 2)%/'%('/*(6; $
'(%/+%&+/*(6 *0( *2D(=*3=*'2/+ 2)*('./+- ?2*0 "^ eH7 %/-(- '(D3.(6# C02- ?/- 63)(
*3 *(-* *0( 0,>3*0(-2- *0/* eH7 D&'6(' %/-(- D22%/++, *3 */L( +3)/'*2(- 43' /6(K&/*( >'(>/'/*23) *2D(#
8(D3.2)< *0( "^ eH7 %/-(- 0/6 +2**+( (44(%* 3) *0( /.('/2+(6 *0( /F3.( 2)43'D/*23) '(2*/+
%/-(- 2) *0( '(=&? @"A$ 7 2B C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
22/80
$ 6(%+/'( &)6(' *0( >()/+*, 34 >(':&', &)6(' *0( +/?- 34 *0( I)2*(6 G*/*(- 34
ED('2%/; B^ I#G#9# h"\XZ; *0/* *0( 43'(=&? @"A$ C 2B C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
23/80
EXHIBIT B
Alphabetical List of Capital Trials Since 2004
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ & 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
24/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Abrar, Shani Nurani Shiekh
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 2:11CR34
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/4/2013
Indictment
3/8/2011
Notice of Intent
4/17/2012
Def Name
Agofsky, Shannon Wayne
D Ct Docket #
E.D. TX 1:03-CR 173
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
6/18/2004
Indictment
8/21/2003
Notice of Intent
1/30/2004
Def Name
Aguilar, Martin
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY No. 01-CR-1367
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/30/200
Indictment
12/10/2001
Notice of Intent
5/14/2004
Def Name
Aquart, Azibo
D Ct Docket #
D. CT 3:06CR160 (PCD)
Status of Case
Death Row - Appeal
Trial D
3/21/201
Indictment
11/8/2006
Notice of Intent
1/29/2009
Def Name
Argueta, Antonio
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 8:05 CR
00393-DKC
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/12/2010
Indictment
8/23/2005
Notice of Intent
5/8/2007
Def Name
Ayala-Lopez, Carlos L.
D Ct Docket #
D. PR No. 03-CR-55
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/15/2006
Indictment
2/13/2003
Notice of Intent
12/17/2003
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ - 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
25/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Baker, Antoine Demetris
D Ct Docket #
E.D. AR No. 4:06 CR
00041 GTE
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
10/13/200
Indictment
2/8/2006
Notice of Intent
8/8/2007
Def Name
Barnes, Khalid
D Ct Docket #
S.D. NY No. 7:04-CR
-00186-SCR
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/11/2008
Indictment
2/27/2004
Notice of Intent
1/19/2006
Def Name
Barrett, Kenneth Eugene
D Ct Docket #
E.D. OK CR No. 04-100-
M-S
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
9/26/2005
Indictment
11/9/2004
Notice of Intent
2/15/2005
Def Name
Basciano, Vincent
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY No. 05-CR-0060
(S-3) (NGG)
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/14/201
Indictment
1/26/2005
Notice of Intent
4/2/2007
Def Name
Basham, Branden
D Ct Docket #
D. SC No. 02-CR-992
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
8/23/2004
Indictment
12/17/2002
Notice of Intent
9/12/2003
Def Name
Baskerville, William
D Ct Docket #
D. NJ CR No. 03-836
(JAP)
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/15/2007
Indictment
12/2/2003
Notice of Intent
6/16/2006
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ ( 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
26/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Benjamin, Terrance
D Ct Docket #
E.D. LA No. 03-CR-274
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
6/10/2008
Indictment
8/19/2003
Notice of Intent
10/19/2004
Def Name
Beyle, Abukar Osman
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 2:11CR34
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/4/2013
Indictment
3/8/2011
Notice of Intent
4/17/2012
Def Name
Bingham, Tyler Davis
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02
-00938-GHK
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/14/2006
Indictment
8/28/2002
Notice of Intent
6/28/2005
Def Name
Bodkins, Lanny Benjamin
D Ct Docket #
W.D. VA No. 4:04-CR
-70083-JLK
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn at trial
Trial D
8/15/2005
Indictment
7/15/2004
Notice of Intent
2/17/2005
Def Name
Bolden, Robert, Sr.
D Ct Docket #
E.D. MO No. 4:02-CR
0557 CEF (AGF)
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
4/24/2006
Indictment
11/7/2002
Notice of Intent
10/7/2003
Def Name
Bourgeois, Alfred
D Ct Docket #
S.D. TX CR No. 02-216
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
2/19/2004
Indictment
7/25/2002
Notice of Intent
7/23/2003
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ ? 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
27/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Breeden, Shawn
D Ct Docket #
W.D. VA No. 03-CR-13
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
9/27/2004
Indictment
2/5/2003
Notice of Intent
7/15/2003
Def Name
Bridgewater, Wayne
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02
-00938-GHK
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/21/2007
Indictment
8/28/2002
Notice of Intent
11/14/2006
Def Name
Burgos-Montes, Edison
D Ct Docket #
D. PR No. 06-009 JAG
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
4/9/2012
Indictment
1/12/2006
Notice of Intent
6/27/2007
Def Name
Byers, Patrick Albert, Jr.
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 08-056
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/9/2009
Indictment
2/5/2008
Notice of Intent
8/5/2008
Def Name
Candelario-Santana, Alexis
D Ct Docket #
D. PR No. 3:09-CR-00427-
JAF
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/14/2013
Indictment
12/16/2009
Notice of Intent
7/8/2012
Def Name
Cannon, Amesheo D.
D Ct Docket #
E.D. MO No. S1
-1:01CR00073RWS
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/28/2005
Indictment
10/18/2001
Notice of Intent
10/31/2002
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ 7 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
28/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Caraballo, Gilberto
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY No. 01-CR-1367
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/14/2008
Indictment
12/10/2001
Notice of Intent
5/14/2004
Def Name
Caro, Carlos David
D Ct Docket #
W.D. VA No. 06 CR
00001
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
1/22/2007
Indictment
1/3/2006
Notice of Intent
1/11/2006
Def Name
Carpenter, Michael Anthony
D Ct Docket #
W.D. VA No. 03-CR-13
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
9/27/2004
Indictment
2/5/2003
Notice of Intent
7/15/2003
Def Name
Casey, Lashaun
D Ct Docket #
D. PR No. 3:05-CR-0277-
JAG
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/22/2013
Indictment
8/17/2005
Notice of Intent
7/17/2007
Def Name
Chance, David Alan
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02
-00938-GHK
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn at trial
Trial D
10/4/2006
Indictment
8/28/2002
Notice of Intent
5/9/2005
Def Name
Cheever, Scott
D Ct Docket #
D. KS CR No. 05-10050
-01-06-MLB
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn at trial
Trial D
9/13/2006
Indictment
3/9/2005
Notice of Intent
7/8/2005
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ C 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
29/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Church, Walter Lefight
D Ct Docket #
W.D. VA No. 00-CR-104
Status of Case
Acquittal
Trial D
2/17/2004
Indictment
12/13/2000
Notice of Intent
5/11/2001
Def Name
Cisneros, Ismael
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 04-CR-283
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/1/2005
Indictment
6/24/2004
Notice of Intent
10/1/2004
Def Name
Clay, Vertis
D Ct Docket #
E.D. AR No. 4:04-CR
-00035 WRW
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/1/2007
Indictment
5/5/2004
Notice of Intent
10/21/2005
Def Name
Coonce, Wesley Paul Jr.
D Ct Docket #
W.D. MO 10-03029-01/02-
CR-S-GAF
Status of Case
Death row
Trial D
4/28/2014
Indictment
4/7/2010
Notice of Intent
7/22/2011
Def Name
Cooper, Andre
D Ct Docket #
E.D. PA No. 01-CR-512
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/9/2006
Indictment
8/28/2001
Notice of Intent
5/23/2005
Def Name
Corley, Odell
D Ct Docket #
N.D. IN No. 02-CR-116
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
9/7/2004
Indictment
11/21/2002
Notice of Intent
8/14/2003
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ D 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
30/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Covarrubius, Javier
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA No. 05 CR 578
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
7/11/2007
Indictment
6/16/2005
Notice of Intent
6/28/2006
Def Name
Cyrus, Dennis, Jr.
D Ct Docket #
N.D. CA No. 05-00324-
MMC
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/12/2009
Indictment
5/24/2005
Notice of Intent
11/1/2006
Def Name
Dinkins, James
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 1:06-CR
-00309-JFM
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
5/4/2009
Indictment
7/11/2006
Notice of Intent
1/25/2008
Def Name
Duncan, Joseph
D Ct Docket #
D. ID CR No. 07-23-N-
EJL
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
4/14/2008
Indictment
1/18/2007
Notice of Intent
1/23/2007
Def Name
Duong, Anh The
D Ct Docket #
N.D. CA No.
5:01CR20154 JF
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/22/2010
Indictment
9/26/2001
Notice of Intent
5/13/2004
Def Name
Ebron, Joseph
D Ct Docket #
E.D. TX No. 1:07-CR-142
(1:08-CR-00036)
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
3/27/2009
Indictment
8/15/2007
Notice of Intent
9/11/2007
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ 8 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
31/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Eye, Gary
D Ct Docket #
W.D. MO No. 4:05-CR
-00344-ODS
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
4/22/2008
Indictment
9/29/2005
Notice of Intent
7/17/2006
Def Name
Fell, Donald
D Ct Docket #
D. VT 2:01-CR-12-01
Status of Case
Awaiting resentencing or retrial
Trial D
5/1/2005
Indictment
2/1/2001
Notice of Intent
1/30/2002
Def Name
Fields, Edward
D Ct Docket #
E.D. OK No. 6:03-CR
-00073
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
7/5/2005
Indictment
8/1/2003
Notice of Intent
3/15/2004
Def Name
Fields, Sherman Lamont
D Ct Docket #
W.D. TX No. 01-CR-164
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
1/12/2004
Indictment
12/11/2001
Notice of Intent
5/23/2003
Def Name
Fort, Emile
D Ct Docket #
N.D. CA No. 05-00167
(WHA)
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
11/17/200
Indictment
3/17/2005
Notice of Intent
10/3/2006
Def Name
Friend, Valeri
D Ct Docket #
S.D. WV CR No. 2:05
-00107
Status of Case
Guilty plea
Trial D
4/16/2007
Indictment
5/4/2005
Notice of Intent
8/16/2006
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ > 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
32/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Frye, James Ernest
D Ct Docket #
S.D. MS No. 01-CR-8
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/24/2005
Indictment
2/23/2001
Notice of Intent
1/18/2002
Def Name
Fulks, Chadrick
D Ct Docket #
D. SC No. 02-CR-992
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
6/1/2004
Indictment
12/17/2002
Notice of Intent
9/12/2003
Def Name
Galan, Thomas A.
D Ct Docket #
N.D. OH No. 3:06-CR
-00730-JGC-1
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/9/2007
Indictment
3/2/2006
Notice of Intent
11/14/2006
Def Name
Garcia-Orellana, Oscar
Alexander
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 04-CR-283
Status of Case
Acquittal
Trial D
3/1/2005
Indictment
6/24/2004
Notice of Intent
10/1/2004
Def Name
Garcia, Edgar B.
D Ct Docket #
E.D. TX 1:09-CR-00015-
MAC-KFG All
Status of Case
Death Row - Appeal
Trial D
5/3/2010
Indictment
1/21/2009
Notice of Intent
2/13/2009
Def Name
Gilbert, Melvin
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 1:06-CR
-00309-JFM
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
5/4/2009
Indictment
8/22/2006
Notice of Intent
1/25/2008
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &, 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
33/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Gilmore, Charles Wesley
D Ct Docket #
W.D. VA No. 00-CR-104
Status of Case
Acquittal
Trial D
2/17/2004
Indictment
2/5/2003
Notice of Intent
7/24/2003
Def Name
Gonzales-Lauzan, Luis
D Ct Docket #
S.D. FL No. 02-CR-20572
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/20/2004
Indictment
7/11/2002
Notice of Intent
6/19/2003
Def Name
Gonzalez, Fausto
D Ct Docket #
D. CT No. 02-CR-7
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
9/7/2004
Indictment
1/10/2002
Notice of Intent
1/21/2003
Def Name
Gooch, Larry
D Ct Docket #
D. DC CR No. 04-128
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/9/2007
Indictment
3/12/2004
Notice of Intent
10/19/2005
Def Name
Gordon, Lorenzo
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 04-CR-58
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/25/200
Indictment
3/2/2004
Notice of Intent
9/30/2004
Def Name
Grande, Oscar
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 04-CR-283
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/1/2005
Indictment
6/24/2004
Notice of Intent
10/1/2004
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ && 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
34/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Green, Steven
D Ct Docket #
W.D. KY No. 5:06-CR
-00019-TBR
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
4/6/2009
Indictment
11/7/2006
Notice of Intent
7/3/2007
Def Name
Griffin, Robert Lee
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02
-00938-GHK
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn at trial
Trial D
10/4/2006
Indictment
8/28/2002
Notice of Intent
6/27/2005
Def Name
Hager, Thomas Morocco
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 1:05-CR
-00264-TSE
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
9/17/2007
Indictment
6/9/2005
Notice of Intent
5/30/2006
Def Name
Hall, Charles Michael
D Ct Docket #
W.D. MO 10-03029-01/02-
CR-S-GAF
Status of Case
Death row
Trial D
4/28/2014
Indictment
4/7/2010
Notice of Intent
7/22/2011
Def Name
Hans, Eric Preston
D Ct Docket #
D. SC No. 6:05 CR 01227-
HMH
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
7/16/2007
Indictment
11/16/2005
Notice of Intent
8/1/2006
Def Name
Hargrove, Demetrius R.
D Ct Docket #
D. KS No. 2:03-CR-20192-
CM-DJW
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/3/2005
Indictment
12/10/2003
Notice of Intent
7/30/2004
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &- 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
35/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Henderson, Darryl
D Ct Docket #
S.D. NY No. 1:02-CR
-00451-MBM
Status of Case
Acquittal
Trial D
11/8/2006
Indictment
4/16/2002
Notice of Intent
2/23/2005
Def Name
Henderson, Thomas
D Ct Docket #
S.D. OH No. 2:06-CR
-00039
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/5/2007
Indictment
2/9/2006
Notice of Intent
12/8/2006
Def Name
Hinestroza, Edwin R.
D Ct Docket #
W.D. MO No. 98- 00311
-01/05-CR-W-2
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/31/200
Indictment
12/16/1998
Notice of Intent
5/4/2005
Def Name
Honken, Dustin
D Ct Docket #
N.D. IA No.3:01-CR
-03047-MWB
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
8/17/2004
Indictment
8/30/2001
Notice of Intent
6/10/2003
Def Name
Houston, Henry Michael
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02
-00938-GHK
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/21/2007
Indictment
8/28/2002
Notice of Intent
11/14/2006
Def Name
Hyles, Tyrese
D Ct Docket #
E.D. MO No. 01-CR-73
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
5/9/2005
Indictment
10/18/2001
Notice of Intent
10/31/2002
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &( 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
36/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Irby, James Allen
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 8:03-CR
-00490-RDB
Status of Case
Lesser included conviction
Trial D
10/3/2005
Indictment
10/29/2003
Notice of Intent
8/2/2004
Def Name
Jackson, David Lee
D Ct Docket #
E.D. TX No. 1:06-CR-51
Status of Case
Death Sentence Vacated and
Authorization Withdrawn
Trial D
10/2/2006
Indictment
4/20/2005
Notice of Intent
1/4/2006
Def Name
James, Richard
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY CR No. 02-778 (S
-1) (SJ)
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/26/2007
Indictment
6/27/2002
Notice of Intent
8/1/2003
Def Name
Jimenez-Bencevi, Xavier
D Ct Docket #
D. PR No. 3:12-CR-00221-
JAF
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
4/15/2013
Indictment
3/23/2012
Notice of Intent
12/7/2012
Def Name
Johnson, Angela
D Ct Docket #
N.D. IA No. 3:01-CR
-03046-MWB
Status of Case
Awaiting resentencing or retrial
Trial D
4/13/2005
3/2/2015
Indictment
7/26/2000
Notice of Intent
4/25/2002
Def Name
Johnson, John
D Ct Docket #
E.D. LA No. 2:04-CR
-00017-HGB-SS
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn
Trial D
5/11/2009
Indictment
1/16/2004
Notice of Intent
2/1/2005
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &? 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
37/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Jordan, Peter
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 04-CR-58
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/25/200
Indictment
3/2/2004
Notice of Intent
9/30/2004
Def Name
Julian, Jermaine Michael
D Ct Docket #
M.D. FL No. 8:07-CR-9-T
-27TGW
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/19/2009
Indictment
1/9/2007
Notice of Intent
10/15/2007
Def Name
Kadamovas, Jurijus
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02-220
(A)-NM
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
7/11/2006
Indictment
3/5/2002
Notice of Intent
8/3/2004
Def Name
Krylov, Petro
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02-220
(A)-NM
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/9/2007
Indictment
3/5/2002
Notice of Intent
8/3/2004
Def Name
Lawrence, Daryl
D Ct Docket #
S.D. OH No. 2:05-CR
-00011-GLF-1
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
2/13/2006
Indictment
1/20/2005
Notice of Intent
9/26/2005
Def Name
Lecco, George
D Ct Docket #
S.D. WV CR No. 2:05
-00107
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
4/16/2007
4/5/2010
Indictment
5/4/2005
Notice of Intent
8/16/2006
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &7 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
38/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
LeCroy, William Emmett
D Ct Docket #
N.D. GA No. 02-CR-38
Status of Case
Death Row - 2255
Trial D
2/17/2004
Indictment
5/15/2002
Notice of Intent
12/20/2002
Def Name
Ledesma, Jose
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA No. 05 CR 578
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
7/11/2007
Indictment
6/16/2005
Notice of Intent
6/28/2006
Def Name
Lighty, Kenneth Jamal
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 8:03-CR
-00457-PJM
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
9/6/2005
Indictment
10/8/2003
Notice of Intent
12/28/2004
Def Name
Lujan, Larry
D Ct Docket #
D. NM No. 05-924
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/20/201
Indictment
4/27/2005
Notice of Intent
7/12/2007
Def Name
Mallay, Ronald
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY CR No. 02-778 (S
-1) (SJ)
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/26/2007
Indictment
6/27/2002
Notice of Intent
8/1/2003
Def Name
Mayhew, John Richard
D Ct Docket #
S.D. OH CR No. 02 03
-165
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
8/1/2005
Indictment
10/2/2003
Notice of Intent
10/5/2004
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &C 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
39/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
McClure, Cornell Winfrei
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 01-CR-367
Status of Case
Life sentence from judge
Trial D
1/5/2005
Indictment
7/9/2001
Notice of Intent
3/4/2002
Def Name
McCluskey, John Charles
D Ct Docket #
D. NM No. 1:10-CR-02734
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
7/22/2013
Indictment
9/29/2010
Notice of Intent
1/26/2012
Def Name
McGriff, Kenneth
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY CR No. 04-966
(ERK) (VVP)
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
11/27/200
Indictment
11/2/2004
Notice of Intent
3/22/2006
Def Name
McTier, James
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY CR No. 05-401
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/15/200
Indictment
5/20/2005
Notice of Intent
12/7/2006
Def Name
Merritt, Robert
D Ct Docket #
E.D. PA No. 2:07-CR
-00550-RBS
Status of Case
Acquittal
Trial D
11/5/2012
Indictment
9/12/2007
Notice of Intent
3/14/2011
Def Name
Mikhel, Iouri
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02-220
(A)-NM
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
7/11/2006
Indictment
3/5/2002
Notice of Intent
8/3/2004
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &D 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
40/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Mikos, Ronald
D Ct Docket #
N.D. IL No. 02-CR 137
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
4/13/2005
Indictment
6/6/2002
Notice of Intent
12/16/2002
Def Name
Mills, Barry Byron
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02
-00938-GHK
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/14/2006
Indictment
8/28/2002
Notice of Intent
6/28/2005
Def Name
Montgomery, Lisa
D Ct Docket #
W.D. MO No. 5:05-CR
-06002-GAF
Status of Case
Death Row - 2255
Trial D
10/1/2007
Indictment
1/12/2005
Notice of Intent
11/16/2005
Def Name
Moonda, Donna
D Ct Docket #
N.D. OH No. 1:06-CR
-00395-DDD
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/4/2007
Indictment
8/16/2006
Notice of Intent
9/6/2006
Def Name
Moses, Keon
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 02-CR-410
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/12/2004
Indictment
9/17/2002
Notice of Intent
3/31/2003
Def Name
Mosher, Ellis
D Ct Docket #
E.D. TX No. 1:06 CR
00101-TH
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/7/2008
Indictment
7/19/2006
Notice of Intent
12/11/2006
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &8 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
41/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Moussaoui, Zacarias
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 01-CR-455
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/6/2006
Indictment
12/11/2001
Notice of Intent
3/28/2002
Def Name
Natson, Michael Antonio
D Ct Docket #
M.D. GA No. 4:05-CR
-00021-CDL-GMF
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/26/2007
Indictment
6/16/2005
Notice of Intent
12/8/2005
Def Name
Northington, Steven
D Ct Docket #
E.D. PA No. 2:07-CR
-00550-RBS
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
11/5/2012
Indictment
9/12/2007
Notice of Intent
3/14/2011
Def Name
OReilly, Timothy
D Ct Docket #
E.D. MI No. 05-80025
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/7/2010
Indictment
1/11/2005
Notice of Intent
11/1/2006
Def Name
Pepin-Taveras, Humberto
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY CR No. 04-0156
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
9/15/2008
Indictment
2/20/2004
Notice of Intent
3/3/2005
Def Name
Perez, Wilfredo
D Ct Docket #
D. CT No. 02-CR-7
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/1/2004
Indictment
1/10/2002
Notice of Intent
1/21/2003
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ &> 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
42/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Phillips, Maurice
D Ct Docket #
E.D. PA No. 2:07-CR
-00549-JCJ
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/4/2010
Indictment
9/12/2007
Notice of Intent
5/4/2009
Def Name
Plunkett, Antoine
D Ct Docket #
W.D. VA No. 4:04-CR
-70083-JLK
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn at trial
Trial D
8/15/2005
Indictment
7/15/2004
Notice of Intent
2/17/2005
Def Name
Quinones, Alan
D Ct Docket #
S.D. NY No. 00 CR 0761
(JSR)
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/14/2004
Indictment
7/20/2000
Notice of Intent
10/26/2001
Def Name
Richardson, Brian
D Ct Docket #
N.D. GA No. 1:08CR139
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/27/2012
Indictment
4/15/2008
Notice of Intent
12/2/2008
Def Name
Rivera, Denis
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 04-CR-283
Status of Case
Acquittal
Trial D
3/1/2005
Indictment
6/24/2004
Notice of Intent
10/1/2004
Def Name
Rodriguez, Alfonso, Jr.
D Ct Docket #
D. ND No. 04-CR-55
Status of Case
Death row - 2255
Trial D
7/6/2006
Indictment
5/11/2004
Notice of Intent
10/28/2004
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ -, 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
43/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Rodriguez, Diego
D Ct Docket #
S.D. NY No. 00 CR 0761
(JSR)
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/14/2004
Indictment
7/20/2000
Notice of Intent
10/26/2001
Def Name
Roman, Lorenzo Catalan
D Ct Docket #
D. PR No. 3:02-CR-117
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/24/2005
Indictment
4/3/2002
Notice of Intent
7/31/2003
Def Name
Rudolph, Eric Robert
D Ct Docket #
N.D. AL No. 00-CR-422
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
4/6/2005
Indictment
11/15/2000
Notice of Intent
12/11/2003
Def Name
Runyon, David
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA CR No. 4:08-CR
-16
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
6/30/2009
Indictment
2/13/2008
Notice of Intent
7/17/2008
Def Name
Sablan, Rudy
D Ct Docket #
D. CO No. 00-CR-531
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/17/2008
Indictment
12/12/2000
Notice of Intent
5/1/2001
Def Name
Sablan, William
D Ct Docket #
D. CO No. 00-CR-531
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/22/2007
Indictment
12/12/2000
Notice of Intent
5/1/2001
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ -& 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
44/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Salad, Ahmed Muse
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 2:11CR34
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
6/4/2013
Indictment
3/8/2011
Notice of Intent
4/17/2012
Def Name
Sanchez, Ricardo
D Ct Docket #
S.D. FL 06-80171-CR-
HURLEY/VITUNAC(s)(s)
Status of Case
Death Row - Appeal
Trial D
1/6/2009
Indictment
11/3/2006
Notice of Intent
2/20/2008
Def Name
Sandstrom, Steven
D Ct Docket #
W.D. MO No. 4:05-CR
-00344-ODS
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
4/22/2008
Indictment
9/29/2005
Notice of Intent
7/17/2006
Def Name
Savage, Kaboni
D Ct Docket #
E.D. PA No. 2:07-CR
-00550-RBS
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
11/5/2012
Indictment
9/12/2007
Notice of Intent
3/14/2011
Def Name
Shakir, Jamal
D Ct Docket #
M.D. TN CR No. 3:98
-00038 (NIXON)
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/20/2007
Indictment
11/20/1998
Notice of Intent
10/29/2002
Def Name
Simmons, Brent
D Ct Docket #
W.D. VA No. 5:04-CR
-30014-SGW
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/7/2005
Indictment
3/3/2004
Notice of Intent
7/28/2004
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ -- 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
45/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Smith, Thomas
D Ct Docket #
W.D. MO No. 3:02 CR
05025
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/24/2007
Indictment
5/2/2002
Notice of Intent
8/7/2003
Def Name
Snarr, Mark
D Ct Docket #
E.D. TX 1:09-CR-00015-
MAC-KFG All
Status of Case
Death Row - Appeal
Trial D
5/3/2010
Indictment
1/21/2009
Notice of Intent
2/13/2009
Def Name
Solomon, Jelani
D Ct Docket #
W.D. PA No. 2:05-CR
-00385-TFM
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
9/24/2007
Indictment
12/14/2005
Notice of Intent
12/29/2006
Def Name
Stinson, John William
D Ct Docket #
C.D. CA CR No. 02
-00938-GHK
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn at trial
Trial D
10/4/2006
Indictment
8/28/2002
Notice of Intent
5/9/2005
Def Name
Street, John P.
D Ct Docket #
W.D. MO No. 4:04-CR
-00298-GAF
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
7/24/2006
Indictment
9/10/2004
Notice of Intent
11/16/2005
Def Name
Talik, Eugene J., Jr.
D Ct Docket #
N.D. WV No. 5:06-CR-51
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
1/15/2008
Indictment
12/5/2006
Notice of Intent
12/29/2006
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ -( 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
46/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Taylor, Michael Lafayette
D Ct Docket #
D. MD No. 02-CR-410
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/12/2004
Indictment
9/17/2002
Notice of Intent
3/31/2003
Def Name
Taylor, Rejon
D Ct Docket #
E.D. TN No. 1:04-CR
-00160-1
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
8/25/2008
Indictment
10/13/2004
Notice of Intent
6/1/2006
Def Name
Taylor, Styles
D Ct Docket #
N.D. IN CR No. 2:01 CR
073 JM
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
7/5/2004
Indictment
4/23/2001
Notice of Intent
7/25/2003
Def Name
Thomas, Keoin
D Ct Docket #
N.D. IN No. 2:01 CR 073
JM
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn at trial
Trial D
7/5/2004
Indictment
7/23/2001
Notice of Intent
7/25/2003
Def Name
Torrez, Jorge Avila
D Ct Docket #
E.D. VA No. 1:11-CR-115
Status of Case
Death Row - Appeal
Trial D
4/1/2014
Indictment
5/26/2011
Notice of Intent
2/9/2012
Def Name
Troya, Danny
D Ct Docket #
S.D. FL 06-80171-CR-
HURLEY/VITUNAC(s)(s)
Status of Case
Death Row - Appeal
Trial D
1/6/2009
Indictment
11/3/2006
Notice of Intent
2/20/2008
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ -? 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
47/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Umana, Alejandro Enrique
D Ct Docket #
W.D. NC No. 3:08-CR
-134-RJC
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
3/12/2010
Indictment
6/23/2008
Notice of Intent
9/23/2008
Def Name
Villegas, Hernardo Medina
D Ct Docket #
D. PR No. 3:02-CR-117
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/24/2005
Indictment
4/3/2002
Notice of Intent
7/31/2003
Def Name
Wilk, Kenneth
D Ct Docket #
S.D. FL No. 04-CR-60216
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
4/2/2007
Indictment
8/26/2004
Notice of Intent
2/19/2005
Def Name
Williams, Connell C.
D Ct Docket #
W.D. OK No. 5:11-CR
-298
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
2/11/2013
Indictment
9/7/2011
Notice of Intent
4/17/2012
Def Name
Williams, Elijah Bobby
D Ct Docket #
S.D. NY No. 00-CR-1008
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/14/2005
Indictment
9/26/2000
Notice of Intent
2/4/2003
Def Name
Williams, Jamain
D Ct Docket #
E.D. PA No. 01-CR-512
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
1/9/2006
Indictment
8/28/2001
Notice of Intent
5/23/2005
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ -7 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
48/80
Federal Capital Cases that Went to Trial Starting in 2004 - 8/25/2014
Def Name
Williams, Michael
D Ct Docket #
S.D. NY No. 00-CR-1008
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
3/14/2005
Indictment
9/26/2000
Notice of Intent
2/4/2003
Def Name
Williams, Naeem
D Ct Docket #
D. HI No. 1:06-CR-00079-
DAE
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
10/29/13
voir d
1/28/2014
Indictment
2/15/2006
Notice of Intent
9/8/2006
Def Name
Williams, Tyrone
D Ct Docket #
S.D. TX No. 03-CR-221
Status of Case
Life sentence from jury
Trial D
2/22/2005
10/3/2006
Indictment
6/12/2003
Notice of Intent
3/15/2004
Def Name
Williams, Vincent
D Ct Docket #
E.D. PA No. 01-CR-512
Status of Case
Authorization withdrawn at trial
Trial D
1/9/2006
Indictment
8/28/2001
Notice of Intent
5/23/2005
Def Name
Wilson, Ronell
D Ct Docket #
E.D. NY No. 1:04-CR
-01016-NGG
Status of Case
Death row - Appeal
Trial D
9/1/2006;
4/17/2013
Indictment
11/17/2004
Notice of Intent
8/2/2005
Def Name
Young, Donnell
D Ct Docket #
M.D. TN CR No. 3:98
-00038 (NIXON)
Status of Case
Guilty plea at trial
Trial D
10/15/200
and
1/12/2009
Indictment
11/20/1998
Notice of Intent
10/29/2002
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)- 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ -C 2B -C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
49/80
EXHIBIT C
Chart of Median Time in Monthsfrom Indictment to Trial
for Capital Defendants 2004-2014
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)( 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ & 2B C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
50/80
Median of Time Between Indictment to Trial - 2004-2014 8-27-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2425
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
A B C D E
Def Name Indictment DP notice Trial Date Ind to Trial
Rivera, Denis 6/24/2004 10/1/2004 3/1/2005 8.0
Garcia-Orellana, Oscar Alexander 6/24/2004 10/1/2004 3/1/2005 8.0
Grande, Oscar 6/24/2004 10/1/2004 3/1/2005 8.0
Cisneros, Ismael 6/24/2004 10/1/2004 3/1/2005 8.0
Moonda, Donna 8/16/2006 9/6/2006 6/4/2007 9.5
Agofsky, Shannon Wayne 8/21/2003 1/30/2004 6/18/2004 9.9
Barrett, Kenneth Eugene 11/9/2004 2/15/2005 9/26/2005 10.4
Simmons, Brent 3/3/2004 7/28/2004 2/7/2005 11.0Lawrence, Daryl 1/20/2005 9/26/2005 2/13/2006 12.0
Gilmore, Charles Wesley 2/5/2003 7/24/2003 2/17/2004 12.2
Caro, Carlos David 1/3/2006 1/11/2006 1/22/2007 12.4
Jimenez-Bencevi, Xavier 3/23/2012 12/7/2012 4/15/2013 12.7
Byers, Patrick Albert, Jr. 2/5/2008 8/5/2008 3/9/2009 12.9
Bodkins, Lanny Benjamin 7/15/2004 2/17/2005 8/15/2005 13.0
Plunkett, Antoine 7/15/2004 2/17/2005 8/15/2005 13.0
Talik, Eugene J., Jr. 12/5/2006 12/29/2006 1/15/2008 13.2
Duncan, Joseph 1/18/2007 1/23/2007 4/14/2008 14.7
Snarr, Mark 1/21/2009 2/13/2009 5/3/2010 15.2
Garcia, Edgar B. 1/21/2009 2/13/2009 5/3/2010 15.2
Moses, Keon 9/17/2002 3/31/2003 1/12/2004 15.7
Taylor, Michael Lafayette 9/17/2002 3/31/2003 1/12/2004 15.7
Henderson, Thomas 2/9/2006 12/8/2006 6/5/2007 15.7
Runyon, David 2/13/2008 7/17/2008 6/30/2009 16.4Jackson, David Lee 4/20/2005 1/4/2006 10/2/2006 17.3
Fulks, Chadrick 12/17/2002 9/12/2003 6/1/2004 17.3
Mosher, Ellis 7/19/2006 12/11/2006 1/7/2008 17.5
Cheever, Scott 3/9/2005 7/8/2005 9/13/2006 18.0
Gonzales-Lauzan, Luis 7/11/2002 6/19/2003 1/20/2004 18.2
Bourgeois, Alfred 7/25/2002 7/23/2003 2/19/2004 18.7
Galan, Thomas A. 3/2/2006 11/14/2006 10/9/2007 19.2
Ebron, Joseph 8/15/2007 9/11/2007 3/27/2009 19.2
Breeden, Shawn 2/5/2003 7/15/2003 9/27/2004 19.4
Carpenter, Michael Anthony 2/5/2003 7/15/2003 9/27/2004 19.4
Jordan, Peter 3/2/2004 9/30/2004 10/25/2005 19.6
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)( 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ - 2B C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
51/80
Median of Time Between Indictment to Trial - 2004-2014 8-27-
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
4344
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
5758
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
A B C D E
Gordon, Lorenzo 3/2/2004 9/30/2004 10/25/2005 19.6
Hans, Eric Preston 11/16/2005 8/1/2006 7/16/2007 19.6
Basham, Branden 12/17/2002 9/12/2003 8/23/2004 20.1
Natson, Michael Antonio 6/16/2005 12/8/2005 2/26/2007 20.3
Umana, Alejandro Enrique 6/23/2008 9/23/2008 3/12/2010 20.6
LeCroy, William Emmett 5/15/2002 12/20/2002 2/17/2004 21.1
Wilson, Ronell 11/17/2004 8/2/2005 9/1/2006; #2
4/17/2013
21.2
Solomon, Jelani 12/14/2005 12/29/2006 9/24/2007 21.3Corley, Odell 11/21/2002 8/14/2003 9/7/2004 21.5
Hargrove, Demetrius R. 12/10/2003 7/30/2004 10/3/2005 21.7
Mayhew, John Richard 10/2/2003 10/5/2004 8/1/2005 21.7
Street, John P. 9/10/2004 11/16/2005 7/24/2006 22.2
Lighty, Kenneth Jamal 10/8/2003 12/28/2004 9/6/2005 22.8
Irby, James Allen 10/29/2003 8/2/2004 10/3/2005 23.1
Fields, Edward 8/1/2003 3/15/2004 7/5/2005 23.1
Friend, Valeri 5/4/2005 8/16/2006 4/16/2007 23.4
Lecco, George 5/4/2005 8/16/2006 4/16/2007;
4/5/2010
23.4
Will iams, Connell C. 9/7/2011 4/17/2012 2/11/2013 24.3
McGriff, Kenneth 11/2/2004 3/22/2006 11/27/2006 24.7
Fields, Sherman Lamont 12/11/2001 5/23/2003 1/12/2004 24.9
Covarrubius, Javier 6/16/2005 6/28/2006 7/11/2007 24.9
Ledesma, Jose 6/16/2005 6/28/2006 7/11/2007 24.9Julian, Jermaine Michael 1/9/2007 10/15/2007 2/19/2009 25.2
Rodriguez, Alfonso, Jr. 5/11/2004 10/28/2004 7/6/2006 25.8
Sanchez, Ricardo 11/3/2006 2/20/2008 1/6/2009 25.9
Troya, Danny 11/3/2006 2/20/2008 1/6/2009 25.9
Salad, Ahmed Muse 3/8/2011 4/17/2012 6/3/2013 26.8
Beyle, Abukar Osman 3/8/2011 4/17/2012 6/3/2013 26.8
Abrar, Shani Nurani Shiekh 3/8/2011 4/17/2012 6/3/2013 26.8
Hager, Thomas Morocco 6/9/2005 5/30/2006 9/17/2007 27.0
Phillips, Maurice 9/12/2007 5/4/2009 1/4/2010 27.7
Perez, Wilfredo 1/10/2002 1/21/2003 6/1/2004 28.6
Green, Steven 11/7/2006 7/3/2007 4/6/2009 29.1
!"#$ &'&()*+)&,-,,)./0 12*34$56 7&8)( 9:;$< ,8=->=&? @"A$ ( 2B C
-
7/25/2019 [Doc 518] 8-29-2014 D Motion to Continue
52/80
Median of Time Between Indictment to Trial - 2004-2014 8-27-
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
7778
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
9293
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
A B C D E
McTier, James 5/20/2005 12/7/2006 10/15/2007 29.6
Eye, Gary 9/29/2005 7/17/2006 4/22/2008 30.7
Sandstrom, Steven 9/29/2005 7/17/2006 4/22/2008 30.7
Wilk, Kenneth 8/26/2004 2/19/2005 4/2/2007 31.2
Will iams, Tyrone 6/12/2003 3/15/2004 2/22/2005 31.6
Gonzalez, Fausto 1/10/2002 1/21/2003 9/7/2004 31.8
Gilbert, Melvin 8/22/2006 1/25/2008 5/4/2009 32.3
Montgomery, Lisa 1/12/2005 11/16/2005 10/1/2007 32.6
Villegas, Hernardo Medina 4/3/2002 7/31/2003 1/24/2005 33.7Roman, Lorenzo Catalan 4/3/2002 7 /31/2003 1 /24/2005 33.7
Gooch, Larry 3/12/2004 10/19/2005 1/9/2007 33.7
Dinkins, James 7/11/2006 1/25/2008 5/4/2009 33.7
McCluskey, John Charles 9/29/2010 1/26/2012 7/22/2013 33.7
Mikos, Ronald 6/6/2002 12/16/2002 4/13/2005 34.1
Torrez, Jorge Avila 5/26/2011 2/9/2012 4/1/2014 34.2
Thomas, Keoin 7/23/2001 7/25/2003 7/5/2004 35.3
Honken, Dustin 8/30/2001 6/10/2003 8/17/2004 35.5
Ayala-Lopez, Carlos L. 2/13/2003 12/17/2003 2/15/2006 36.0
Candelario-Santana, Alexis 12/16/2009 7/8/2012 1/14/2013 36.9
Church, Walter Lefight 12/13/2000 5/11/2001 2/17/2004 38.1
Taylor, Styles 4/23/2001 7/25/2003 7/5/2004 38.3
Baskerville, William 12/2/2003 6/16/2006 2/15/2007 38.4
Cannon, Amesheo D. 10/18/2001 10/31/2002 2/28/2005 40.4
Clay, Vertis 5/5/2004 10/21/2005 10/1/2007 40.9Bolden, Robert, Sr. 11/7/2002 10/7/2003 4/24/2006 41.4
McClure, Cornell Winfrei 7/9/200