do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the quran? rebuttal
TRANSCRIPT
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 1/30
1 | P a g e
Liphe Guru said:
Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran?
August 28, 2013 at 11:58pm
Now that most people with at least two functioning brain cells have seen through the"Obey the messenger means obey Bukhari" sophistry, a new line of attack on the
"meaning" of Quran is being witnessed. This new game although not orchestrated by
the Hadith peddling crowd, has the exact same potential for distortion of Islam. Since
the bulk of distortions in the sect scene's version of Islam can be traced to Jewish and
Christian secondary sources, it is impossible to note the similarities. So now it's all
about referring to the "uncorrupted" Tawrah and Injil.
My Response:
Allah says:
“Do not tasubbū (INSULT) those unto whom they pray beside Allah, fayasubbū (LEST
THEY INSULT) Allah ʿadwan (IN ENMITY) bighayri (WITHOUT) ʿil'min
(KNOWLEDGE)...” Sura 6:108...
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 2/30
2 | P a g e
Why do Muslims like Liphe insult Allah‟s Qur‟an by insulting other revelations of
Allah? He alleges that there is a new line of attack on the „meaning‟ on the Qur‟an also
adding insult to injury claiming it‟s a new game putting it on the same line as those
who calls to Hadith. He claims that distortions can be trace back to Jewish and
Christian‟s sources we must be referring to „uncorrupted‟ Tawrah and Injil.
He didn‟t heed the words of Allah when Allah says not to insult others who pray but
this isn‟t the people‟s prayer he‟s insulting the Book(s). Not only is he insulting the
Book(s) he‟s insulting the Qur‟an because the Qur‟an refers to, appeals to the same very
books he claim are corrupted.
Why is Allah instructing the Hudan back to a corrupted Tawrah?
"Say: "O people of the Scripture, you are not upon anything until you uphold the
TAWRAH AND THE INJIL AND ALL AND WHAT WAS SENT DOWN TO YOUFROM YOUR LORD." And for many of them, what was sent down to you from your
Lord will only increase them in transgression and rejection. So do not feel sorry for the
rejecting people." Sura 5/68
, if the Tawrah, Injil are corrupted or if the Tawrah is the same Qur'an we are
reading why is Allah telling Ahlul Kitab to uphold corrupted books or to uphold ALL
of the Books of Allah instead of just calling them to uphold the Qur'an?
Not all of Ahlul Kitab were guilty and disbelievers and among them
were those who uphold the Tawrah, believed in it, followed it...
"And from the people of the Scripture are those who believe in Allah and what unzila
(was sent) down to you and what unzila (was sent) down to them; fearful to Allah, they
do not purchase with His revelations a cheap price. These will have their reward with
their Lord. Allah is quick in reckoning." Sura 3/199
Allah says and from Ahlul Kitab are those who BELIEVE in the Qur'an in what was sent
to them, Tawrah, Injil... and they are fearful of Allah and they don't purchase with His
revelations a cheap price.
How can they believe in a Book revealed to the Prophet Muhammad if they are the
same Book as the Tawrah or do the believing Ahlul Kitab have their own copies and the
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 3/30
3 | P a g e
disbelieving Ahlul Kitab have the corrupted copies?
How can they believe in a corrupted book they have with them if it‟s corrupted?
If their books are corrupted then it doesn't make sense Allah says they don't purchase
with His revelations a cheap price does it?
"And when they listen to the revelation received by the Messenger, you will see their
eyes overflowing with tears, for they recognize the truth: they pray: "Our Lord! we have
believed (amanna); write us down among the witnesses (Shahadin)" Sura 5/83
Since they have corrupted books how can they RECOGNIZE the truth within it?
Liphe said:
The disturbing thing to notice is that it is coming from those who claim to be reading
the Quran "carefully". Let‟s g et one thing out of the way, since their claim mirrors the
Orientalist's claim that Quran does not say that previous scriptures are in a corrupted
state, let us see what the Quran actually says. Here is the verse which clearly says
that the Children of Israel twist/distort/corrupt and forgot the words of the
Dhikr and if we read the very next verse it says exactly the same thing about the
Christians.
So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard.
They distort ( ) words from their proper places usages and have forgotten aportion of that of which they were reminded. And you will still observe deceit
among them, except a few of them. But pardon them and overlook [their misdeeds].
Indeed, Allah loves the doers of good. Quran 5:13
My Response:
What some of our Muslim brothers/sisters like Liphe fail to realize is the ayat says
nothing about changing words from the text of the Scripture.
In fact, when we consult the earliest Muslim views we soon discover that the Jews wereaccused of changing words by misinterpreting the text.
“So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard.
yuḥarrifūna (THEY DISTORT) kalima (THE WORDS) an (FROM) mawāḍiʿihi
(THEIR PALCES) and have forgotten a portion of that of which they were reminded.
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 4/30
4 | P a g e
And you will still observe deceit among them, except a few of them. But pardon them
and overlook [their misdeeds]. Indeed, Allah loves the doers of good.” Sura 5:13
Allah informs us of the punishment He inflicted upon them when they
violated His Covenant. Allah says:
“because of their breach of their covenant, We have cursed them, that is, because they
broke their pact, Allah expelled them from His Guidance. And <made their hearts
grow hard> so they will not accept their guilt.
The verse, < yuḥarrifūna (THEY DISTORT) kalima (THE WORDS) an (FROM)
mawāḍiʿihi (THEIR PALCES) > means THEY MISINTERPRETED THE VERSES OF
ALLAH, according to their own desires, and fabricated lies against Him.
“And indeed, there is among them lafarīqan (A GROUP) who yalwūna (DISTORT)
the Scripture alsinatahum (WITH THEIR TONGUES) so you may think it is from the
Scripture, but it is not from the Scripture. And they say, "This is from Allah ," but it is
not from Allah. And they speak untruth about Allah while they know.” Sura 3:78
Allah says none can change His Words however, as what Muslims do with the Qur‟an,
the Jews and Nazarenes ALTER AND DISTORT THEIR APPARENT MEANINGS.
The Tawrah and Injil REMAIN AS ALLAH REVEALED THEM, AND NO LETTER IN
THEM WAS REMOVED. However, again just like Muslims do with Hadith and
Sunnah, these Rabbis misguide others by addition and false interpretation of the
Tawrah, Injil along with the Qur‟an, relying on books that they wrote themselves.
It‟s no wonder they say: "This is from Allah," but it is not from Allah. They corrupt the
word mean they alter or change its meaning.
Yet no one is able to change even a single word from any Book of Allah. The meaning
is that they interpret the word wrongly.
I don‟t follow any Hadith or Sunnah yet we are told that the Tawrah and Injil has been
corrupted. Where did this come from? Did it come from the Qur‟an, no. Did it come
from Hadith or Sunnah books well, for the sake of argument let us investigate a bit interms of what did the Scholars of the Sunnah and Hadith have to say about the Tawrah.
Muslims will be quick to „say‟ that the Qur‟an explicitly states that the Tawrah [tahrif].
A popular thought amongst Muslims today is that tahrif implies “they changed the text
of the Tawra”.
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 5/30
5 | P a g e
I would suggest and encourage you, Muslim or not to reject this opinion that is held by
the majority in favour of the earliest and most credible sources which explicitly state the
text of the Tawrah is intact, but Banu Yisrael misinterpreted it.
Ibn Abbas Misinterpreted the text
“They corrupt the word means they alter or change its meaning, yet no one is able to
change even a single word from any Book of God. The meaning is that they interpret
the word wrongly” – (Kitaab Al-Tawheed, Baab Qawlu Allah Ta‟ala, Bal Huwa
Qur‟aanun Majeed, fi lawhin Mahfooth) and “The word Tahrif [corruption] signifies to
change a thing from its original nature; and there is no man who could corrupt a single
word of what proceeds from God, so that the Jews and Christians could corrupt only by
misrepresenting the meanings of the word of God” (Muhammad Isma‟il al-Bukhari,
quoted in Hughes‟ Dictionary of Islam, p.62) – these ahadith indicate that those who
walked with the Prophet (PBUH) believed the text of the Torah was original, whileholding the view that the Jews perverted their interpretation. 154 AH
164 years after the Prophet‟s (PBUH) death
Ibn al-Layth Misinterpreted the text
In the year 796 Abu l-Rabi Muhammad ibn al-Layth (a courtier to Kalif Harun al-Rashid
) penned a letter to Constatine VI stating that the word “tahrif” should be read as the
Jews had distorted their sense. “Whoever looks in the books of the prophets will find
Muhammad (PBUH) mentioned, but the people of the book have obscured thesereferences by changing their interpretation”. Ibn al-Layth categorically denies the
possibility of passages having been added to, or omitted from, the scriptures, and he
then goes on to use the text of the Torah as proof of the authenticity of the Torah (a
belief both he and the kalif share).
1 Risalat Abi l-Rabiʿ Muhammad ibn al-Layth allati katabaha li-l-Rashod ila Qustantin
malik al-Rum
213 AH
223 years after the Prophet‟s (PBUH) death
Ibn Rabban Misinterpreted the text
In the year 855 Ali ibn Rabban al-Tabari reaffirmed what al-Layth said before him, that
the Jews distorted their interpretation of the scriptures and not of the text itself . Both
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 6/30
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 7/30
7 | P a g e
c 290 AH
300 years after the Prophet‟s (PBUH) death
Al-Baqillani Misinterpreted the text
Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn al-Tayyib al-Baqillani was of the opinion that the words of
Moses were still extant in their Hebrew original and that the Jews had inadvertently
made mistakes in their translations.
305 AH
315 years after the Prophet‟s (PBUH) death
Al-Ma‟sudi Misinterpreted the text
Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn al-Husayn ibn Ali al-Mas‟udi wrote that in the context of theTorah the word “tahrif” means that the Jews had distorted the sense of the Torah and
not the text.
3 Muruj adh-dhahab wa ma‟adin al-jawahir
c 340 AH
350 years after the Prophet‟s (PBUH) death
Al-Muqaddasi Changed the text
Al-Muqaddasi was the first author to deviate from the traditional understanding of
“tahrif” with his suggestion that the very text of the Torah had suffered distortion. It
took 300 years for a scholar to suggest this innovative idea and despite it being
incompatible with the view of far greater scholars before him, it is this view that is most
popular today.
390 AH
400 years after the Prophet‟s (PBUH) death
Ibn Hazm Changed the text
The most influential accusation of Jews falsifying the text of the Torah came 400 years
after the death of Muhammad (PBUH) from Ibn Hazm an Andalusian scholar that
denied Mosiac authorship and instead charged Ezra (Uzair) with penning the text we
read today. This was a radical change from predecessors like Ibn Qutayba and Al-
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 8/30
8 | P a g e
Tabari who not only believed the original words were extant, but that it was Ezra who
reinstated them after they had been forgotten.
4 Al-Fisal fi al-Milal wal-Ahwa wal-Nihal
390 AH
400 years after the Prophet‟s (PBUH) death
al-Biruni Misinterpreted & changed the text
Abu Rayḥan al-Biruni a contemporary of Ibn-Hazm found prophetic allusions to
Muahammad (PBUH) in the Torah , while simultaneously holding the belief that some
of the words had been altered by Banu Yisrael.
So here we have it only three Scholars believed that the Tawrah was changed, the rest of
them believed that the Tawrah was quoted out of context. This is not corruption at all.
In classical Arabic, this word [tahrif] can either mean “alteration” (in the text), or
“misinterpretation” (in the sense). While most of contemporary Muslim propagandists
take only the first possible meaning into consideration, plenty of authoritative scholars
of old (including Imam al-Ghazali and Shaykh Muhiddin Ibn „Arabi) prefer the second
one, and support their point of view through ahadith which are universally accepted as
authentic. According to one of them, the Prophet Muhammad asked the Jews of Medina
to bring their Torah Scroll and to read from it to confirm a verdict (and the argument is
“were that Scroll adulterated, the Prophet would have never judged on its base”).
According to another hadith, he met Jews who were bringing a Torah Scroll in
procession, kissed the Scroll and said “amantu bika wa amantu bima fik” (I believe in
you and in yours contents). The argument here is “were that Scroll adulterated, the
Prophet would have never said „I believe in your contents‟.”. As a Muslim scholar, I
think that showing all these and other legal proof in Islam is the best way to lead
Muslims to recognize the Divine character of the Torah as the Jews have it today.
What is the actual Arabic word Liphe is looking for that means corrupt?
khā bā lām ( ) Kh-Ba-Lam = To be or become corrupted, unsound, vitiated or
disordered in intellect or reason, become possessed or insane, be lost, cut off, deprived
of heart or reason. Prevent or hinder from doing a thing. Affliction, trouble, difficulty,
distress, fatigue. Seek to corrupt, render unsound, occasioning to agitation like that of
possession or insanity, by disease affecting the reason and thought. Difficulty in people
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 9/30
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 10/30
10 | P a g e
(THEIR PALCES) and have forgotten a portion of that of which they were reminded.
And you will still observe deceit among them, except a few of them. But pardon them
and overlook [their misdeeds]. Indeed, Allah loves the doers of good.” Sura 5:13
The Arabic word Allah uses is Ha-Ra-Fa To pervert, dislocate, change, turn away, discard
anything from, alter, tamper with. To turn a thing from its proper way or manner,
mistranscribe a word, earn or gain subsistence or labour to do so for one's family or
household, suffer the loss of property, turn away or aloof, to be debarred from the
means of subsistence, to be made to experience difficulty, straitened in means of
subsistence, have one's earnings or gain turned away from him.
In any of the ayats does Allah say they distorted the written Tawrah, the
written Words of Allah?
"Do you covet, that they would believe for you while farīqun (A PARTY) min'hum (OFTHEM) yasmaʿūna (HEAR) kalāma (THE WORDS) of Allah and yuḥarrifūnahu
(THEN THEY DISTORT) it after they had understood it while they were knowing?"
Sura 2/75
Allah explains this is what they used to do:
"Among the Jews yuḥarrifūna (THEY DISTORT) kalima (THE WORDS) from
mawāḍiʿihi (THEIR PROPER PLACES) and say, "We hear and disobey" and "Hear but
be not heard" and "Ra'ina," twisting their tongues and defaming the religion. And ifthey had said [instead], "We hear and obey" and "Wait for us [to understand]," it would
have been better for them and more suitable. But Allah has cursed them for their
disbelief, so they believe not, except for a few." Sura 4/46
"O Messenger, let them not grieve you who hasten into disbelief of those who say, "We
believe" with their mouths, but their hearts believe not, and from among the Jews.
[They are] avid listeners to falsehood, listening to another people who have not come to
you. yuḥarrifūna (THEY DISTORT) kalima (THE WORDS) min (FROM) baʿdi
(AFTER) mawāḍiʿihi (THEIR CONTEXT), saying "If you are given this, take it; but if
you are not given it, then beware." But he for whom Allah intends fitnah – never will
you possess [power to do] for him a thing against Allah. Those are the ones for whom
Allah does not intend to purify their hearts. For them in this world is disgrace, and for
them in the Hereafter is a great punishment." Sura 5/41
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 11/30
11 | P a g e
There is not one ayat Allah alluding to a corrupted Tawrah at all. Again, what has been
presented is that they misinterpreted the text. Muslims do the same today with the
Qur‟an.
Yet, Liphe said:
And Quran 5:13 just nails it :)
If concealing and rearranging parts of the scripture is not corrupting it then what is?
After the above verses are brought to one's attention, if one still keeps on insisting
that these verses are not enough or the more illogical position that they are not
referring to the Towrah and Injil just because the words Towrah and Injil are not
used then it will be easy to conclude that it is nothing but a case of intellectual
dishonesty, especially when the whole narration has to do with Children of Israel.
Actually you don't need quotes from the Quran to prove that the previous scriptures
are tampered with and thus corrupted. As far as evidence of Quran being the very
word of God goes, there is plenty. Just because somebody hasn't taken the trouble to
discover it doesn't mean it is not there by the truckload. Both positions can be
independently verified by applying the test of non-contradiction, a Quranic
standard.
Then there is the bizarre position that since Muslims also distort the Quran it is
acceptable that those who distorted the previous scripture were not any different.
The issue is not who distorted what, the issue is that the previous scriptures stand
distorted irrespective of whether the Quran is distorted or not. And the Quran says
that they are distorted and when we apply the various tools at our disposal it
confirms the distortions. One can play the semantics game but anything not in its
original form is distorted Period.
And that is the difference!!!
My Response:
"O People of the Book, surely there has come to you our Messenger, making clear to you
much of what you used to tukh'funa (CONCEAL) of the scripture wa-ya'fu an kathira
(AND OVER LOOKING /FORGIVING MUCH). Surely has come to you from Allah a
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 12/30
12 | P a g e
light and a clear book" Sura 5/15
The Arabic word 'tukh'funa' comes from the root KHA-FA-YA which carries the
meaning of what is unapparent / has become imperceptible / has become dim to the
sight / or suppressed, or obscured to the mind. It also carries the meaning of somethingwhich has become 'concealed'.
Therefore, the Quran within context of its Arabic usage clearly recognized that certain
aspects of the previous scriptures had become gradually concealed and deemed it fit to
expound on some of them. It was also not the intention of the Quran to deal with each
and every narrative of the Bible hence the term 'wa-yafu an kathiran' (forgive, pardon,
pass over, relinquish or remit a whole or part or indeed pardon much).
No matter what we think we believe about the previous books it is clear that something
was being read by Ahlul Kitab 'contemporaneous' and 'coexistent' with the Prophetic
ministry which the Qur‟an recognized. This also does not negate the fact that there
would have also been a lot of traditions which were in situ as mainstay beliefs in certain
communities of Ahlul Kitab.
Thus, at times certain Gospels / Canonical Books of the New Testament were given
more emphasis in different churches. Therefore, what the Qur‟an addressed were
'beliefs and doctrines' of the time of the ministry that the Prophet Muhammad came
into contact with in 7th century Arabia which may not have always been 'scriptural' but
also partly held in traditions and general theology.
The Qur‟an within context of its Arabic usage clearly recognized that certain aspects of
the previous scriptures had become gradually concealed and deemed it fit to expound
on some of them. It was also not the will of Allah revealing the Qur‟an to deal with
each and every narrative of the Canonical Hebrew, Nazarene Scriptures hence the term
'wa-yafu an kathiran' (forgive, pardon, pass over, relinquish or remit a whole or part
or indeed pardon much).
Therefore, the Qur‟an also acted as a 'guard' over the previous scriptures to confirm
(musaddiqan) aspects of the previous scriptures that it deemed necessary to expound
upon and to determine what is true and false of its interpretation.
“ To you We revealed the Scripture in truth, confirming the scripture that is between
the hands (coexistent Tawrah and Bible), wa-muhayminan (and guarding it by
determining what is true and false.)" Sura 5:48
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 13/30
13 | P a g e
As with the Qur‟an, it is not the text which gives rise to erroneous interpretations but
the theology that is 'often read' into the scriptures. This is as true for the the Tawrah,
the Injil as well as is true for the Qur‟an such as the theology of „Hadith‟ and „Sunnah‟
and the Shites belief in the 12 Imams and Ahlul bayt.
Allah says:
“Shall I seek other than Allah for judge, when He it is Who hath revealed unto you
(this) Scripture, fully explained? Those unto whom We gave the Scripture (aforetime)
know that it is revealed from your Lord in truth. So be not you of mum'tarīna (the ones
who doubt). watammat (And has been) fulfilled kalimatu ( the Word) of you Lord
ṣid'qan (in truth) waʿadlan (and justice). Lā (No) mubaddila (one can change)
likalimātihi (HIS WORDS). He is the Hearer, the Knower. Sura 6:114-115
"And certainly We gave Moses the Scripture, so do not be in mir'yatin (doubt) liqaihi
(encountering it) and We made it a guide for the Children of Israel" Sura 32:23
Hence, we have the Arabic word 'liqai' (the 'hi' simply being a pronoun) comes from
the root word 'Lam-Qaf-Ya' which means:
1) to encounter
2) meet
3) see
4) come across5) or see face to face
What does Allah mean by “And certainly We gave Moses the Scripture, so do not be in
mir'yatin (doubt) liqaihi (ENCOUNTERING IT)”
The same Arabic word “mir'yatin (doubt)” used in Sura 32:23 is also used in the
following:
“So is one who [stands] upon a clear evidence from his Lord [like the aforementioned]?
And a witness from Him follows it, and before it was the Scripture of Moses to lead andas mercy. Those [believers in the former revelations] believe in the Qur'an. But whoever
disbelieves in it from the various factions - the Fire is his promised destination. So be
not in mir'yatin (DOUBT) min'hu (about it). Indeed, it is the truth from your Lord, but
most of the people do not believe.” Sura 11:17
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 14/30
14 | P a g e
“So do not be in mir'yatin (DOUBT), as to what these [polytheists] are worshipping.
They worship not except as their fathers worshipped before. And indeed, We will give
them their share undiminished.” Sura 11:109
“But those who disbelieve will not cease to be in mir'yatin (DOUBT) of it until the
Hour comes upon them unexpectedly or there comes to them the punishment of a
barren Day.” Sura 22:55
All of the above ayats mentions being not to be in doubt, or not to contend now in Sura
41:54 we have doubt and meeting as we have in Sura 32:23,
Allah says:
"And certainly We gave Moses the Scripture, so do not be in mir'yatin (DOUBT) liqaihi
(ENCOUNTERING IT) and We made it a guide for the Children of Israel" Sura 32:23
“Unquestionably, they are in mir'yatin (DOUBT) min (ABOUT) liqāi (MEETING)
with their Lord. Unquestionably He is, of all things, encompassing.” Sura 41:54
So based upon the Qur‟an alone, Allah tells us not to contend, be in doubt about
meeting, encountering, or being face to face with the Book of Moses.
Allah says:
“Shall I seek other than Allah for judge, when He it is Who hath revealed unto you
(this) Scripture, fully explained? Those unto whom We gave the Scripture (aforetime)
know that it is revealed from your Lord in truth. So be not you of mum'tarīna (the ones
who doubt). watammat (And has been) fulfilled kalimatu ( the Word) of you Lord
ṣid'qan (in truth) waʿadlan (and justice). Lā (No) mubaddila (one can change)
likalimātihi (HIS WORDS). He is the Hearer, the Knower. Sura 6:114-115
Unfortunately, some of our Muslims Brothers/Sisters like Liphe, believe that this ayat
refers to the decrees or laws of Allah regarding, for instance, who will be allowed to
accept the guidance. They then claim that these ayats isn‟t referring to his Books per se.
Yet, there is nothing in the immediate context which rules out the Books from being
part of the words which Allah claims can never be changed.
In fact, there are Muslims who go so far as to use passages such as the above to prove
that the Qur‟an cannot be abrogated or changed:
The claim of corruption is in complete contempt of Allah's words in the Qur‟an:
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 15/30
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 16/30
16 | P a g e
3. Therefore, no one has or can change the Tawrah, Zabur and Injil.
Here we can see that there was a punishment from Allah sent to those who divided the
Qur‟an and made the Qur‟an into parts. This is so serious that they also will be question
by Allah.
Allah says:
"As we sent down (PUNISHMENT) on muq'tasimīna (THOSE WHO DIVIDED) those
who made jaʿalū (HAVE MADE) the Qur‟an ʿiḍ īna (IN PARTS) fawarabbika (SO BY
YOUR LORD) lanasalannahum (SURELY WE WILL QUESTION THEM) ajma ʿīna
(ALL) about what they used to do.” Sura 15:90-91
Deserving of punishment all because they divided it into parts I mean looking at the
ayat this is serious. Yes, it is a confirmation of what is between its Hands which is the
Torah, Injil. This clearly confirms that the previous Scriptures are intact and the Qur'anis a confirmation of it and guardian yet the Qur'an says that the previous Scriptures also
confirm the Qur'an.
Allah says about the so called Scattered Books of Moses:
“They measured not Allah with a true measure when they said, „Allah has not sent
down aught on any mortal.‟ Say: „Who sent down the Book that Moses brought as a
light and a guidance to men? YOU PUT IT Iqarāṭ īsa (NTO PARCHMENTS),
tub'dūnahā (YOU DISCLOSE SOME OF IT), watukh'fūna (AND HIDING) kathīran(MUCH); and you were taught that you knew not, you and your fathers.‟ Then leave
them alone, playing their game of plunging. This is a Book We have sent down, blessed
AND CONFIRMING THAT WHICH bayna yadayhi (THEY HAVE IN THEIR
HANDS) Sura 6:91-92
Now the question is ==> Iqarāṭīsa (NTO PARCHMENTS) <== SCATTERING the Book
that Moses received into HALF TRUTH? Allah says that they put it into
PARCHMENTS some of it they revealed and some of it they concealed. This ayat does
not say anything about them corrupting the Book of Allah given to Moses.
Allah uses the same word ==> Iqarāṭīsa <== in:
"And even if We had sent down to you, kitāban (A WRITTEN SCRIPTURE) fi (IN)
qir'ṭāsin (A PARCHMENT) and they touched it with their hands, the disbelievers
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 17/30
17 | P a g e
would say, "This is not but obvious magic." Sura 6/7
Allah says those who divided the Qur‟an into parts was deserving of punishment, what
Qur‟an was this Allah is referring to Liphe? Have you not seen this particular ayat?
Allah mentions the Book of Moses yet Allah says:
“This is a Book We have sent down, blessed AND CONFIRMING THAT WHICH
bayna yadayhi (THEY HAVE IN THEIR HANDS) Sura 6:92
Allah still makes it very clear that this Book of Moses is still with them and the Qur‟an
came confirming the point that this Book is still with them. You are similar to the Sunnis
you want to Slander the Tawrah, the Injil yet something happened to the Qur‟an as well
you won‟t slander the Qur‟an though. This is a major contradiction you have to face up
to.
The hidden Origin of Islam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKzXzCCVC1I&feature=share
Liphe said:
If one still insists on this impossible position then the only logical conclusion is they are
not interested in getting to the truth of the matter. If I were to insist that show me a
verse in the Quran by name that says that we should read yes it should say read the
Tawrah before we can understand the Quran, again by name then what will be your
reaction?
Quran is what it is and nobody can demand how it should convey a point. Furthermore,
in spite of the clear failure to understand the facts behind the impossible to carry the
argument that Quran cannot be proved to be the very word of God, it can be and once
again there is plenty of evidence to support it and there nothing that matches it with the
same degree of certainty for any other claims of Revelations currently in circulation.
None whatsoever
Allow me to try and put the verses where it is stated that we should refer to those who
had previously received the message in perspective. The first thing we note in all the
related verse is that not once we were asked to refer to a previous message, it is always
to the people who were given the message. And the repeated use of the past tense to
qualify it to be a guide and a reminder is important. Because Quran 15:9 is in the
present tense and it is an unqualified declaration. It is also clear as to what happened in
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 18/30
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 19/30
19 | P a g e
My Response:
The Qur‟an has used for phrases speaking of groups of Jews or Nazarenes at the time of
Prophet Muhammad spoken of as believers or unbelievers in order to emphasize that
there were always some true believers who would not have changed their own
scriptures.
"That which we have revealed to you of the Book is the truth, attesting to (the truth of)
that which is bayna yadayhi (IS BETWEEN HIS HANDS) (THE TAWRAH AND THE
GOSPEL)” Sura 35/31
"This Qur'an is not such as can be produced by other than Allah; but it is a verification
of that bayna yadayhi (IS BETWEEN HIS HANDS) (THE TAWRAH AND THE
GOSPEL), and the explanation of the book, wherein there is no doubt, from the Lord of
the worlds." Sura 10/37
"...It (the Qur'an) is not a fabricated story, but a verification of that which bayna
yadayhi (IS BETWEEN HIS HANDS) (THE TAWRAH AND THE GOSPEL), a
detailed explanation, a guide and a mercy to the people who believe." Sura 12/111
“Wamin qablihi (AND BEFORE IT), was kitābu (THE BOOK OF MOSES) imāman (AS
A GUIDE) waraḥmatan (AND A MERCY). Wahādhā (AND THIS) kitābun (THIS IS A
BOOK) muṣaddiqun (CONFIRMING) in the Arabic tongue; to admonish the unjust,and as Glad Tidings to those who do right.” Sura 46/12
"Behold, We turned towards you a company of Jinns listening to the Qur'an...When the
(reading) was finished they returned to qawmihim (THEIR PEOPLE) as warners. They
said, ` yāqawmanā (O OUR PEOPLE)! we have heard kitāban (A BOOK) revealed baʿdi
(AFTER) Moses muṣaddiqan (CONFIRMING) lima (WHAT) bayna yadayhi (IS
BETWEEN HIS HANDS) (THE TAWRAH AND THE GOSPEL) guiding to the truth
and to a straight path.'" Sura 46/29-30
When it is said to them, "Believe in what Allah Hath sent down, "they say, "We believe
in what was sent down to us:" yet they reject all besides, even if it be Truth muṣaddiqan
(CONFIRMING) lima (WHAT) maʿahum (IS WITH THEM). Say: "Why then have ye
slain the prophets of Allah in times gone by, if ye did indeed believe?" Sura 2/89
“And when a messenger from Allah came to them confirming that which maʿahum
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 20/30
20 | P a g e
(WAS WITH THEM), farīqun (A GROUP / PARTY) of those who had been given the
Scripture threw the Scripture of Allah behind their backs as if they did not know.” Sura
2/101
The Qur'an is an Arabic "verification / confirmation" of the Book of Moses which isnecessary because the people in the Prophet‟s time couldn't understand what "the two
group before" them had LEARNED by "assiduous study"; or they would have followed
it better".
Assiduous:
1. Constant in application or attention; diligent: an assiduous worker who
strove for perfection. See Synonyms at busy.
2. Unceasing; persistent: assiduous research.
“And when there comes unto them a Scripture (the Qur'an) from Allah,
muṣaddiqun (CONFIRMING) lima (WHAT IS) maʿahum (WITH THEM)
although before they used to pray for victory against those who disbelieved -
but [then] when there came to them that which arafū (THEY
RECOGNIZED), they disbelieved bihi (IN IT); so the curse of Allah will be
upon the disbelievers..” Sura 2/89
THE TRUE ULEMA / SCHOLARS of this DEEN of Islam are theLEARNED / SCHOLARS of the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL:
“And has it not been āyatan (A SIGN) that yaʿlamahu (KNOW IT) ʿulamāu
(THE SCHOLARS / LEARNED) of THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL?” Sura
26/197
Allah says about people like you Liphe, those who believe in part of the
Qur‟an and disbelieve in part of the Qur‟an:
“Do not tasubbū (INSULT) those unto whom they pray beside Allah, fayasubbū (LEST
THEY INSULT) Allah ʿadwan (IN ENMITY) bighayri (WITHOUT) ʿil'min
(KNOWLEDGE)...” Sura 6:108...
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 21/30
21 | P a g e
We have to study this ayat very carefully, Allah forbids us from insulting others whom
they serve besides Allah. Yet, Allah doesn‟t even mention about a previous Scripture
that He revealed. If we are not supposed to insult others whom they serve besides Allah
we have no right in slandering previous Scriptures that we may not agree with or that
we feel has been distorted.
Allah says:
“Then, you are those [same ones who are] killing one another and evicting a party of
your people from their homes, cooperating against them in sin and aggression. And if
they come to you as captives, you ransom them, although their eviction was forbidden
to you. afatu'minūna (SO DO YOU BELIEVE) bibaʿḍi (IN PART) kitābi (OF THE
BOOK) watakfurūna (AND DISEBELIEVE) bibaʿḍin (IN PART)? Then what is the
recompense for those who do that among you except disgrace in worldly life; and on
the Day of Resurrection they will be sent back to the severest of punishment. And Allahis not unaware of what you do.” Sura 2/85
"Hast thou not turned your vision to those who were given a portion of the Book? They
buy and sell error... Of the Jews there are those who change the words from their
(right) places, and say: `we hear and we disobey'; and `hear what is not heard', and
`Ra'ina' with a twist of their tongues and a slander to faith. If only they had said: `We
hear and we obey'; and `Do hear'; and `Do look at us'; it would have been better for
them and more upright; but God has cursed them for their unbelief; and they will not
believe except a few. O you to whom the Book came, believe in what We sent down (theQur'an), attesting to (the truth of) what IS WITH YOU (the Tawrah) , before we deface
your countenances..." Sura 4:44-47
As in the preceding passage the charge is made against "those" (some) of the Jews "who
change the words"; but here several examples are given - examples where Qur‟ans
words are being altered.
What people do from the Jews to the Muslims even Jews was to twist words and
expressions, so as to ridicule the most solemn teaching of Faith. Where they should
have said, `we hear and we obey,' they said aloud, `We hear,' and whispered, "Wedisobey." Where they should have said respectfully, `We hear,' they added in a whisper,
`What is not heard,' by way of ridicule. Where they claimed the attention of the Teacher,
they used an ambiguous word apparently harmless, but in their intention disrespectful.
`Ra'ina' if used respectfully in the Arabic way, would have meant `Please attend to us'
(or `Do look at us'). With a twist of their tongue, they suggested an insulting meaning,
such as `O thou that takest us to pasture!', or in Hebrew, `Our bad one!'"
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 22/30
22 | P a g e
It‟s obvious that the Jews were covering some verses and reading others out of context.
In Arabic this is called "al-tahrif al-ma`nawi" or "CHANGING THE MEANING".
Hasn‟t the same thing happen to the Qur‟an?
It is also necessary to emphasize the little phrase "EXCEPT A FEW". There were a fewwho were serious, who believed.
Allah says clearly that any who believe in Allah and the last day and
does righteous deed will not fear nor grieve:
"Those who believe, and those who are Jewish, and the Sabiens, and the Nazarenes;
whoever of them believes in Allah and the Last Day and does good works, then they
will have nothing to fear nor will they grieve." Sura 5/69
"Surely those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Nazarenes, and the Sabiens;
any one of them who believes in Allah and the Last Day, and does good work, they will
have their reward with their Lord, with no fear over them, nor will they grieve." Sura
2/62
"Those who believe, and those who are Jewish, and the Sabiens, and the Nazarenes;
whoever of them believes in Allah and the Last Day and does good works, then they
will have nothing to fear nor will they grieve." Sura 5/69
The Ahlul Injil are told by Allah to judge by their Injil (Gospel) and if they don‟tthey are disbelievers:
"walyaḥkum (And let judge) with the people of the Injil what Allah has sent down in it.
And whoever does not judge by what Allah has sent down, then these are the
disbelievers." Sura 5/47
The Hudan (Jews) are told to judge by their Tawrah:
"But yuḥakkimūnaka (how is it that they ask thee for judgment) seeing that they havethe Tawrah, fīhā (in it) ḥuk'mu (is Allah's injunctions) - and thereafter turn away? Such
as these, then, are no [true] believers." Sura 5/43
Whoever don't judge by the Book of Allah are disbelievers:
"We have sent down the Tawrah, fīhā (in it) hudan (is guidance) wanūrun (and a
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 23/30
23 | P a g e
light); the prophets who have surrendered yaḥkumu (judged) bihā (with it) for those
who are Jews, as well as the Rabbis, and the Priests, for what they were entrusted of
Allah's Scripture, and they were witness over. So do not fear the people but fear Me;
and do not purchase with My revelations a cheap price. And whoever does not judge
with what Allah has sent down, then these are the rejecters." Sura 5/44
If there were true corruption of the Tawrah and Injil ask yourself this
simple question would Allah appeal the Ahlul Kitab (People of the
Book) back to these corrupted books. Wouldn‟t Allah make the Qur‟an
enough for them all?
"Say: "O people of the Scripture, you are not upon anything until you uphold the
Tawrah and the Injil and what was sent down to you from your Lord." And for many of
them, what was sent down to you from your Lord will only increase them intransgression and rejection. So do not feel sorry for the rejecting people." Sura 5/68
Among the the people of Moses their are a section / group of them who
guide and who establish justice in the light of truth what book are they
using to do this:
"Of the people of Moses there is a section who guide and do justice in the light of truth."
Sura 7/159
Ahlul Kitab are told to recite their Scripture are they reciting a corrupted
Book:
"Those to whom We have given the Scripture and they yatlūnahu (RECITE IT) as it
truthfully deserves tilāwatihi (To BE RECITED); they believe bihi (in it). As for those
who disbelieve in it, they are the losers." Sura 2/121
There are among Ahlul Kitab those who believe in Allah and the Qur'an
and they fear Allah and do not purchase with His revelations a cheap
price:
"And from the people of the Scripture are those who believe in Allah and what unzila
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 24/30
24 | P a g e
(was sent) down to you and what unzila (was sent) down to them; fearful to Allah,
they do not purchase with His revelations a cheap price. These will have their reward
with their Lord. Allah is quick in reckoning." Sura 3/199
How can it be possible to fine the Prophet's description in a Book lost orcorrupted:
"Those who follow the messenger (Tabiuna RasulAllah), (Nabiya Ummiya), whom they
find maktūban (written)ʿindahum (with them) fi (in) the Tawrah and the Injil;- for he
commands them to what is right and forbids from what is wrong (munkar); he allows
them as lawful what is good (and pure) and prohibits them from what is bad (and
impure) (Khabaitha); He relieves from them their burdens and from the fetters which
were upon them. So it is those who believe in him, honour him, help him, and follow
the light which is sent down with him,- it is they who will prosper." Sura 7/157
Again, the Qur‟an basis is validity from the Tawrah and Injil.
Among Ahlul Kitab are those who are upright and they recite the Revelations of
Allah during the night and they make sajud, they believe in Allah and the last day
and they enjoin right and forbid wrong and do good deeds:
"They are not all the same, from the people of the Scripture ummatun (are a nation) that
is upright; they recite Allah's revelations during parts of the night and they prostrate.
They believe in Allah and the Last Day, and they enjoin what is right and forbid what is
wrong and hasten to good deeds. And those are among the righteous." Sura 3/113-114
What book are they reciting?
Among Ahlul Kitab are those who listen to the Qur'an and when they listen their eyes
become teary RECOGNIZING THE TRUTH WITHIN it how are they able to do this
with a corrupted Book:
"And when they listen to the revelation received by the Messenger, you will see their
eyes overflowing with tears, for they recognize the truth: they pray: "Our Lord! we have
believed (amanna); write us down among the witnesses (Shahadin)" Sura 5/83
Among Ahlul Kitab are those who believe in Allah and the Qur'an and
they submit to Allah not selling Allahs ayati for a miserable gain:
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 25/30
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 26/30
26 | P a g e
1) Allah says Moses was given the Book
continued....
"Do they not reject what was given to Moses before? They say: 'TWO KINDS OF
SORCERY, EACH ASSISTING THE OTHER!"
Again, we know that Moses was given the Book. They are accusing the Book of Moses
and the Qur'an as two kinds of sorcery supporting each other.
"And they say: 'For us, we reject all (such things)!'Say: "Then bring bikitābin (A
BOOK) minʿindi lahi (FROM ALLAH)"
Again, the topic of discussion is "bikitābin (A BOOK)" from Allah this is clear. Allah
instructed the Prophet to say to them present a book from Allah this doesn't have
anything to do with magicians. Its about 'a book' from Allah.
the ayat continues....
" which ahdā (IS A BETTER GUIDE) min'humā (THAN BOTH OF THEM) (Tawrah
and the Qur‟an" , attabiʿ'hu (THAT I MAY FOLLOW IT)! (do), if ye are truthful!""
So Allah puts the Book of Moses next to the Qur'an and challenges the unbelievers to
bring a book which is not only a better guide than the Qur'an, but also better than the
book of Moses! This presumes that the book of Moses was:
(a) available during Prophet Muhammad‟s time, and
(b) equal to the Qur'an in terms of guidance.
The Qur'an goes on to state that the previous scriptures are similar to it, being just
mithlihi (LIKE IT), the very same expression as found in the verses quoted at the
beginning of this paper:
"Say: Have you considered if it is from Allah, and you disbelieve in it, and a witness
from among the children of Israel has borne witness of one mith'lihi (LIKE IT), so he
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 27/30
27 | P a g e
believed, while you are big with pride; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people ...
And before it the Book of Musa was a guide and a mercy: and this is a Book
VERIFYING (it) IN the Arabic language that it may warn those who are unjust and as
good news for the doers of good." Sura 46/10
"To the like-thereof ==> like the Qur'an, and the meaning is that the contents of the
Tawrah hence, the Pentateuch by their purport attest the Qur'an, as corresponding
therewith, or resembling it which means the Qur'an lays its existence and validity on
the Tawrah.
"And before it kitābu (WAS THE BOOK) of Moses imāman (AS A GUIDE)
waraḥmatan (AND A MERCY). And this is a confirming Book in an Arabic tongue to
warn those who have wronged and as good tidings to the doers of good." Sura 46/12
So this proves the Qur'an is from Allah and believed, that is, in the
Qur'an, when the witness saw the intimations of revelation
corresponding with the truth.
Also if we study the Qur'an carefully we will see Allah putting a structure of the
argument perhaps assuming the divine origin of the Tawrah, is the author of the Qur'an
argues that because the Qur'an is "like the Tawrah", therefore it is of divine origin as
well.
In this context at least, the Qur'an seeks to derive its authority from the authority of the
Tawrah this is clear.
However, the relation of "being like it" is symmetric, i.e. "the Qur'an being like the
Tawrah" implies also "the Tawrah being like the Qur'an".
This is simple fundamentals. Thus, based on the testimony of the Qur'an itself, the
Book of Moses is like it, and therefore meets the above quoted challenge "to bring
something like it".
My contention is that it is evident from the above citations that the author of the Qur'an
Allah the Most High, believed that the Book of Moses, met the Quran‟s challenge to
produce something like it.
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 28/30
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 29/30
7/30/2019 Do we have to consult the previous scriptures to understand the Quran? Rebuttal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/do-we-have-to-consult-the-previous-scriptures-to-understand-the-quran-rebuttal 30/30