do retrieved.asp(2)

MCA21/2013

15.04.2015

Filetakenuptodayas14.04.2015wasdeclaredholiday

onaccountofbirthdayofDr.B.R.Ambedkar,aspernotificationno.

300/G4/Genl./DHCdated 13.04.2015 of HighCourt of Delhi. In

termsthereof, thecasesfixedforordersfor14.04.2015weretobe

takenuptodayi.e.15.04.2015.

Present: None.

Videmyseparateorderannouncedintheopencourt,the

applicationu/s5ofLimitationAct,1963ofappellantisallowedand

delayhasbeencondonedsubjecttopaymentofcostofRs.2000/by

appellanttorespondent.

Tocomeupforargumentsonappealon21.05.2015.

(GURVINDERPALSINGH)ADJ(Central)01,Delhi/15.04.2015(AD)

M/2A/2010

15.04.2015

Present: Appellant with Sh. J.K. Nayyar, ld. counsel seeks

adjournmentforfilingamendedmemoofparties.Letitbesofiled.

Noneforrespondents.

Putupforconsiderationon06.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)ADJ1(Central)Delhi15.04.2015(hk)

M12/2014

15.04.2015

Present: Noneforparties.

CourtnoticesissuedtoLRsnotreceivedback.

Order16.10.2014becompliedafreshfor07.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)ADJ1(Central)Delhi 15.04.2015(hk)

M13/2014

15.04.2015


CourtnoticesissuedtoLRsnotreceivedback.

Order16.10.2014becompliedafreshfor07.07.2015.


M11/2014

15.04.2015


Intheinterestofjustice,putupforargumentson

restorationapplicationandapplicationforcondonationofdelayon

07.07.2015.


M10/2014

15.04.2015


Intheinterestofjustice,putupforargumentson

restorationapplicationandapplicationforcondonationofdelayon

07.07.2015.


CSNo.149/2014

15.04.2015

Present: Noneforplaintiff.

Anapplicationonbehalfofplaintiffu/oVRule20read

withSec.151CPCwasfiled.

RCsenttodefendantwasreceivedbackwiththereport

addressofdefendantbeingincomplete.Inthisfactofthematter,let

plaintifffurnishcompleteandcorrectaddressofdefendant,supported

byaffidavit,withinaweekuponwhichprocessbeissuedtodefendant

videspeedpost/permissiblecourier/RCandontakingstepswithina

week,for08.07.2015.

There appears no occasion for issuance of process by

publication.


C.S.No.210/2014

15.04.2015

Present: Sh. Kumar Ranjit, ld. counsel for petitioner has given

statement for withdrawal of application u/s 9 of Arbitration and

ConciliationAct,1996.

In view of the statement of petitioner's counsel, the

applicationisdismissedaswithdrawn.

FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.


C.S.No.212/2014

15.04.2015








C.S.No.211/2014

15.04.2015








C.S.No.213/2014

15.04.2015








C.S.No.18/2015

15.04.2015








C.S.No.43/2015

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.ManishKumar,ld.counselforplaintiff.

RCreceivedbackwithreportofdefendant havingleft

thegivenaddress.

Freshaddressofdefendantbefurnishedwithsupporting

affidavitandontakingstepswithinaweek,defendantbeservedvide

speedpost/RC/permissiblecourier,for08.07.2015.


M3/2015

15.04.2015

Present: Noneforapplicant/plaintiff.

Noticesofapplicationu/oIXRule4readwithSec.151

CPCwereissuedtodefendants/counsel.

Defendants 1, 2 & 4 are reportedly expired while

defendantno.3andcounselareservedbutnoneappearedforthem.

Appropriate steps be taken by applicant/plaintiff

accordingly.

Matterisfixedforfurtherproceedingson09.07.2015.


VivekKhannaVs.ShyamLalMittal

RCA02/2015

15.04.2015

File takenuptodayonapplication ofappellantseekingissuanceof

dastisummonsforpublication.

Present: Noneforappellantdespitecalls.

Orderdated08.04.2015needstobecompliedinletterand

spirit.

Thereisnooccasionforissuanceofdastisummons.

Putupondatedfixedi.e25.05.2015.


C.S.No.30/2013

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.D.D.Dhyani,ld.counselforplaintiff.

Sh.AmolSharma,ld.counselfordefendantno.1withSh.

PrabhasKumar,employeeofdefendantno.1.

Nonefordefendantno.2.

Defendantno.3ispreviouslyexparte.

Ld.counselfordefendantno.1hasfiledhispowerof

attorney

Sh. Prabhas Kumar, examined as DW1 and cross

examined.Ld.counselfordefendantno.1Sh.AmolSharmahasgiven

statementofclosingdefendant'sevidenceonbehalfofdefendantno.1.

Nootherwitnessofdefendants'isinattendance.Nosteps

havebeentakenbydefendantno.2forleadingevidence.

Defendant'sevidenceisclosed.

Putupforfinalargumentson28.05.2015.Partiesareat

libertytofilewrittenargumentsnotexceedingfivepageseach.


C.S.No.80/2014

15.04.2015

Present: Sh. Rajeev Garg, ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks

adjournmenttosubmitbeingnotpreparedtodaywantingtoinspectthe

file.

Put up for consideration and further proceedings on

02.06.2015.


C.S.No.84/2014

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.DevashishRout,ld.proxycounselforplaintiff.

Sh.R.K.Jain,ld.counselfordefendanthasfiledreplyto

applicationseekingamendmentofplaint.Copygiven.

Fixedforargumentsonsaidapplicationon01.06.2015.


C.S.No.119/2014

15.04.2015

Present: PlaintiffwithSh.SanjayShangari,ld.counsel.

Sh.AnkurGhaiandSh.SarveshSingh,ld.counselsfor

defendant.

Ld.counselforplaintiffhasfiledreplytoapplicationfor

deposit of rent by defendant, replication with documents and

rejoinders to interim injunction application and application u/s

XXXIXRule10CPC.Copiesgiven.

Put up for arguments on aforesaid applications on

02.06.2015.


C.S.No.122/2012

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.Ashwani,ld.proxycounselforplaintiff.

Defendant no.2 with Sh. Saurabh Tyagi, ld. proxy

counselforSh.J.K.Jain,ld.counselfordefendants1to6and8,8&

11.

Ld. counsel for plaintiff is stated to be ill and not

available today and adjournment is sought by proxy counsel for

plaintiff.

Putupon18.05.2015forfinalarguments.


C.S.No.527/2009

15.04.2015

Present: PlaintiffwithSh.InduBhushanVimal,ld.counsel.

Defendantno.2 withSh.PuneetSingh, ld.counselfor

both defendants seeks adjournment being not prepared to address

argumentstoday.

Putupforfinalargumentson27.05.2015.


TM75/2011

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.ArnavGhosh,ld.proxycounselforplaintiff.

Sh. Abhishek Malhotra, ld. counsel for defendant has

placedonrecordcopyof deposit of cost of Rs. 10,000/ in Prime

Minister'sNationalReliefFundbynetbankingandseeksoneweek's

adjournment to address arguments after taking instructions from

defendant.

Plaintiff'scounselisalsostatedtobenotavailabletoday.


libertytofilewrittenargumentsnotexceedingsixpageseach.


C.S.No.63/2012

15.04.2015

Present: Plaintiff withSh. Sumit Rana, ld. proxycounsel seeks

adjournment as plaintiff's counsel is not available today to address

arguments.

Defendantno.1withSh.R.K.Saini,ld.counsel.


libertytofilewrittenargumentsnotexceedingfivepageseach.


C.S.No.137/13

15.04.2015

Present: Mohd.Sadiqeen,partnerofplaintiffwithSh.S.S.Ali,ld.

counsel.

Sh.MayanakWadhwa,ld.counselfordefendant.

Plaintiff's counsel has filed written arguments. Copy

given.

Oralargumentsalsoheard.

Putupfororderson30.04.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

RCA13/2014

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.S.A.Khanld.counselforplaintiff.

Sh.KishorKumar,ARofrespondentseeksadjournment

ascounselisnotavailable.Adjournmentisgranted.

Nowtocomeupforargumentsonappealon13.05.2015


Ex.No.162/2011

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.PrashantBatra,ld.counselforDHhasmoved

applicationu/s151CPCwithaffidavitofDH.

Nowtocomeupon05.05.2015forconsiderationand

disposalofthisapplication.


C.S.No.358/2013

15.04.2015

Present: PlaintiffwithSh.SandeepSingh,ld.counselforplaintiff.

Defendantinperson.

Plaintiffhasfiledhisaffidavitinevidence.Copygiven

today.Advancecopyofaffidavitwasnotsuppliedtodefendantprior

totoday.

Matterisfixedforplaintiff'sevidenceon19.05.2015.

Stepsbetakenwithinaweek.


C.S.No.415/2009

15.04.2015


Defendantno.20Sh.GauravwithSh.S.S.Barwal,ld.

counsel.

Ld.counselpresentsubmitsthathehasnotreceivedany

advancecopyofaffidavitofplaintiff'switness.

Beawaited.


Calledagain.Itis1.25PM.


Defendantno.20Sh.Gauravinperson.

Noneforotherdefendants.

Beawaited.


PTO

::2::

Calledagain.Itis2.35PM.

Present: Noneforplaintiffdespiterepeatedcallssincemorning.

Defendantno.20Sh.Gauravinperson.

Noplaintiff's witness is in attendance. Nosteps have

beentakenforsummoninganywitness.Plaintiff'sevidenceisclosed.

Putupfordefendant'sevidenceon19.05.2015.Advance

copyofaffidavitsofwitnesseswhoaretobeexamined,besuppliedto

thesideoppositeatleast15dayspriortonextdateofhearing.


C.S.No.533/2008

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.S.S.Dhingra,ld.counselforplaintiff.

Defendants1&4withSh.Mohd.Yameen,ld.counsel

fordefendants1to6.

DW2Ms.ShirinDuttacrossexamined.Ld.counselfor

defendants1to6hasgivenstatementofclosingdefendant'sevidence

onbehalfofdefendants1to6.

Plaintiff'scounselsubmitsthathehasnotreceivedany

advance copy of affidavit of any defendant witness on behalf of

defendants7&8.Despiteopportunities,nowitnessofdefendants7&

8isinattendancenoranycounselforthemhasappeared.

Defendants'evidenceisclosed.

Putupon02.06.2015forfinalarguments.


MCA2/2013

15.04.2015

Present: AppellantwithSh.J.K.Chopra,ld.counsel.

Sh.K.L.Tandon,partnerofrespondentwithSh.Bharat

BhushanGupta,ld.counsel.

Heard.

Ld. appellants counsel has givenstatement that under

instructions he seeks to withdraw this appeal, with liberty to take

recoursetoappropriateremedy,whateverispermissibleinlaw.

Inviewofthestatementofappellant'scounsel,theappeal

isdismissedaswithdrawnwithlibertyprayedfor.



M34/2014

15.04.2015

Present: PetitionerwithSh.UchitBhandari,ld.counsel.

Sh.K.N.Singh,ld.counselforrespondent.

WitnessSh.JagdishLalGaba,DeputyManagerofState

BankofIndia, RASMECCCG.T.Road,Panipat (HR)ispresent.

Petitioner'scounselsubmitsthatinadvertentlyhecouldnotmentionin

theapplicationtheparticularsofadvertisementofthebank,whichwas

tobeproducedbythewitnessandintheabsenceofwhich,witness

cannotbeexaminedtoday.Thewitnessisdischargedfortoday.

Putuforevidenceofapplicant/petitioneron08.07.2015.


M33/2012

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.K.N.Singh,ld.counselforapplicant/petitioner.

RespondentinpersonwithSh.UchitBhandari,ld.

counsel.

PutupwithconnectedmatterbearingNo.M34/2012on

08.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)ADJ1(Central)Delhi15.04.2015

(hk)

ICICIBankLtd.Vs.HarishKumarEx.No.48/11

15.04.2015

FiletakenuptodayonapplicationofDHforcondonationofdelayin

filingthePF.

Present: Nonedespitecalls.

Stepswerenottakenwithintwoweeksof25.02.2015i.e.

thelastdateofhearing.Not muchtimeisleftforthenextdatei.e.

01.05.2015. Neither the AR of DH nor the counsel of DH has

appeared.

Letmatterbeputupondatefixedi.e.01.05.2015.


CSNo.261/2013

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.Mohd.Ikram,ld.counselforplaintiff.

Sh.VineetKaushik,ld.counselfordefendant.

Argumentsheard.

Putupfororderson14.05.2015.


CSNo.194/14

15.04.2015

Present: PlaintiffwithSh.AnilKumarSingh,ld.counselhasfiled

documentswithlist.

DefendantwithSh.ParveenKumar,ld.counsel.

Admissiondenialofdocumentsgotdone.

Defendant has admitted her signatures on sale deed dt.

23.08.2005,executedbySmt.KamlaDeviinherfavourandhasdenied

purportedsignaturesofheronGPA,AgreementtoSell,Affidavit,Will,

Receipt,PossessionLetterandRentreceiptviz.documentsatpages19

to29oflistofdocumentsfiledtodaybyplaintiff.Intokenofabovesaid

admissiondenial,defendanthasappendedhersignaturesanddefendant's

counselhasalsososigned.TheaforesaidSaleDeed dt.23.08.2005is

nowexhibitedasEx.P1.

Heard.Perused.

Fromthepleadingsoftheparties,followingissuesariseand

areframed:

1)WhetherthedefendantexecutedGPA,AgreementtoSell, Affidavit,Will,ReceiptandPossessionLetteron04.07.2011in favourofplaintiff?OPP

2)Whethertheplaintiffhadletoutthesuitpropertytodefendant? OPP

::2::

3)Whetherthedefendanthadpaidrentfrom05.08.2011to 05.11.20011,asalleged?OPP

4)Whethertheplaintiffisentitledforpossessionofsuitproperty? OPP

5)Whethertheplaintiffisentitledforrent?Ifso,atwhatrateand forwhatperiod?OPP

6)Whethertheplaintiffisentitledformesneprofits?Ifso,at whatrateandforwhatperiod?OPP

7)Whethernocauseofactionexistsinfavourofplaintiffand againstthedefendant?OPD

8)Relief

Nootherissuearisesorpressedfor.

Matterisnowfixedforplaintiff'sevidenceon09.07.2015.Listof

witnesses be filed by the parties within 15 days. Advance copy of

affidavitsofwitnesses,whoaretobeexamined,besuppliedtotheside

oppositeatleast15dayspriortothenextdateofhearing.


CSNo.85/2015

DineshBhatiaVs.KhemSingh

Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and

registered.

15.04.2015

Present: Sh.SagarAggarwal,ld.counselforplaintiff.

Summonsofthesuitbeissuedtodefendantonfilingof

PF/RC/speedpostfor02.06.2015.Stepsbetakenwithinaweek.


TM09/2015

AdidasAGVs.ChopraSons

Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and

registered.

15.04.2015

Present: Sh. Narinder Kumar, ARof plaintiff with Sh. Pramod

KumarSingh,ld.counsel.

Requestforpassingexparteinteriminjunctionismade

with insistence for appointing Local Commissioner for seizing the

counterfeit products from the building/shop of the defendant. It is

contendedthatifpriornoticeofsuitisgiventothedefendant,hewill

in all probability remove the infringed material and equipment in

order to frustrate thecase. Request seems genuinein viewof the

documents and purported counterfeit products emanating from

defendantshown.

Plaintiff claims to be the largest manufacturer of

Sportswearapparels, shoes and accessories in Europe and second

largestintheworld.Itistheowneroftrademarks'adidas',withlogo

ofthreestrips,'trefoil'anditsproductsunderthesemarksareTM09/2015 Page1of5

available in 160 countries worldwide including India. Although, it

formallyentered India in 1989yet adidasand relatedbrandswere

alreadywellknownhere.Theplaintiffhassponsoredmanyeventsin

the Olympics and FIFA world cup. The plaintiff carries out

advertisementsinIndiaandotherpartsoftheworld throughprint,

televisionandothermediaforpromotionofitsbrandandproductsand

incurshugeexpensesonaccountofadvertisement.Theplaintiffhas

hugeturnoverandintheyear2012itsworldwidenetsaleswere14883

millionEuro.Theplaintiffhasgotitsvarioustrademarks,logosand

devices registered from 1989 onwards. Its products under the

registeredtrademarkhave extensivelybeenacceptedasquality and

standard products. The excellent reputation and goodwill has thus

been acquired by the plaintiff amongst the user/consumers of its

productsduetostrictqualitycontrol.

DuringmarketsurveyinthelastweekofMarch,2015,

the defendants has been found to have engaged in manufacturing,

selling, stocking, anddistributing of counterfeit footwear including

Shoes and accessories under the trademark and logo 'adidas', 3

stripes''threebars'and'Trefoil'anddeceptivelysimilartrademarks

whicharemuchinferiorinquality.ThelabelattachedandtrademarksTM09/2015 Page2of5

embossedontheimpugnedproductsofdefendantaresimilarindesign

andappearanceandsufficienttoconfusethepotential purchaserof

the products of the plaintiff. The defendant has infringed the

registeredtrademarksandlogosofplaintiffwithmalafideintention.

I have perused the sample of Shoes purportedly

belongingtothedefendantandonecoming outoftheplaintiff.The

wordmarkandlogo'adidas'and'3stripes'oftheplaintiffareusedin

the impugned product prominently as that of the plaintiff. By

adopting exactlytheidenticaltrademarkofplaintiff, thedefendant

hasapparentlytriedtoconfusethepotentialcustomersofplaintiffand

alsodenttheirrevenues.Theunwarycustomerofplaintiffneedstobe

protected fromsecondary products of unscrupulous persons like

defendantwhomaybeouttomakequickbuckwhilepayingforthe

highendproducts of plaintiff. Theplaintiff thushasbeen able to

makeouttheprimafaciecaseforgrantofexparteinjunction.

The defendant, its associates and agents, distributors,

employeesrepresentativesandassignsare restrainedfromusingthe

trademarksandlogosofplaintiffonanyfootwearincludingshoesand

other accessories and from giving any indication in any manner

reflectingtheirassociation/affiliationoroftheirproductswiththeTM09/2015 Page3of5

plaintifftillthenextdate.

In order to seize the infringing goods, material and

equipmentsfromtheshopofdefendant,Sh.AbhishekVerma(Mob.

No.9891899809) isappointedasLocalCommissionerwithdirection

tovisitthepremises/godownofdefendantlocatedat ShopNo.29,

Ground Floor, Gaffar Market, Karol Bagh, New Delhi110005

and also at Building No. 2342/2343, Ajmal KhanRoad, Karol

Bagh, Beodanpura, New Delhi110005 and seize the infringing

materiali.e.Shoesandotheraccessoriesunderthetrademark'adidas',

'3 stripes' 'three bars' and 'Trefoil' and deceptively similar

trademarks. He shall prepare an inventory of goods and material

seizedfromtheaboveaddressesandreleasethemtodefendantortheir

officialonsuperdariaftersealingtheseizedarticlesinbags.Heshall

alsoputhisinitialsonthebagsandsomeoftheincriminatingmaterial

withindelibleink.

TheLd.LocalCommissionermaytakehelpofthelocal

policeincaseofneed.SHOPSKarolBaghisdirectedtoprovideall

possiblehelptotheLocalCommissionerinsmoothlycarryingoutthe

commission.

TM09/2015 Page4of5

FeeofLd.LocalCommissionerisfixedatRs.30,000/to

be paid in advance. The commission be carried out within five

workingdays fromtodayaftergivingnoticeofcommissiontothe

defendantatthespot.Ld.LocalCommissionermaysubmithisreport

withintwoweeksofexecutionofthecommission.Acompletepaper

bookbeprovidedtoLd.LocalCommissionerbytheplaintiff.

Let summons of the suit and notice of accompanying

applicationsbesenttodefendantonPF/RCfor 20.05.2015.Plaintiff

shallcomplywiththeprovisionsofOrder39Rule3CPCwithinfive

workingdaysandkeepthegenuineandcounterfeitproductofwhich

photographshavebeenfiledinsamecondition.

Copyoftheorderbegivendastiasprayed.


TM09/2015 Page5of5

C.S.No.533/2008

15.04.2015

DW2:Ms.ShirinDutta,recalledforcrossexamination.

OnS.A.

XXXXbySh.S.S.Dhingra,ldcounselforplaintiff.

Idonothaveanysaledeedorothertitledocumentinrespectof

suitproperty.Withinoneortwoyearsof1954whenmyfathercame

as pastor, the suit property was constructed. I amnot having any

documentwithregardstoanybuildingmaterialorconstructionofthe

suitproperty.

Itiscorrecttosuggestthattheelectricityconnectionandwater

connectionofsuitpremisesareinthenameofChurch.Itiscorrectto

suggest that my father was appointed as pastor of Central Baptist

Church,1890,ChandniChowk,Delhi.

Noproperty taxofsuitpropertywaspaidbymyfatherorby

meafterhisexpiry.

ItiscorrecttosuggestthatIwasbaptisedon01.01.1968bymy

father. It is correct to suggest that on 01.01.1968 my father was

resident of 207, Kingsway Camp, Dhaka, Delhi. It is correct to

suggestthatIwasmarriedon30.09.1987withMr.VijayDuttaandat

CSNo.533/2008 DW2 Page1of3

thattimeintherecordsoftheChurchIhadmentionedmyresidenceto

beatCBCChurch.Itiscorrecttosuggestthatatthetimeofmarriage

ofmysisterMs.JyotikaMassey,shewasresidinginCBCChurch.It

is incorrect to suggest that electricity and water charges of suit

premisesafterthedeathofmyfatherin2004,werepaidbytheChurch

tillthedateoffilingofthesuit.Itiscorrecttosuggestthatbefore

filingofthesuit,counselforplaintiffhadgivenanoticetousandwe

hadgotsentareplytoitthroughcounsel.

Itisincorrecttosuggestthatnumberofsuitpremisesis1890

anditisnot1889,ChandniChowk,Delhi06.

Itiscorrecttosuggestthattheentryforusisthesamewhichis

theentryforthechurchandtheschoolrunbychurchandguardposted

attheentrygateisofthechurch.

I am not aware so I cannot admit or deny whether 1889,

ChandniChowk,Delhi06ispropertyofMr.AmarNathMehra,prop.

ofKumarCinema.

Itisincorrecttosuggestthatwehavewronglyvaluedthesuit

propertyasitisnotsupportbyanyreportofapprovedvaluer.Itis

correcttosuggestthatIhavenotdoneanyworkinthefieldofsale

andpurchaseof properties. I amnotawarewhatsuit propertycan

fetchasrentifitisletouttodaysoIcannotadmitordenywhetherthe


suitpropertycanfetchRs.10,000/monthlyrent. Itisincorrectto

suggestthatIamdeposingfalsely.

RO&AC (GurvinderPalSingh)ADJ1(Central)Delhi15.04.2015(hk)

StatementofSh.Mohd.Yameen,ld.counselfordefendants1to6.

AtBar

Iclosedefendant'sevidenceonbehalfofdefendants1to6.



C.S.No.30/2013

15.04.2015

DW 1: Sh. Prabhas Kumar S/o Dr. Purnendu Kumar, Operation

Officer, Standard Chartered Bank; Age 33 yrs; EducationB.A.

(Hons.),OfficeaddressBahadurShahJafarMarg,NewDelhi.

OnS.A.

Itendermyevidencebywayofaffidavit,whichisEx.DW1/A

ItbearsmysignaturesatpointsAandB.Ialsorelyupondocuments

i.e copies of account opening form and ration card, which are

describedasEx.DW1/1(colly.) intheaffidavitEx.DW1/Abut I

havenotbroughttheoriginalsofthesedocumentsastheywereseized

bythepoliceandfortodaynostepsweretakenforsummoningthem.

The documents above said Ex. DW1/1(colly.) are nowmarked as

MarkDX1(colly.).

XXXXbySh.D.D.Dhyani,ldcounselforplaintiff.

Since01.08.2005IamemployedinStandardCharteredBank.

ItiscorrecttosuggestthatIhavenotfiledonrecordanydocument

authorisingmeasrepresentativeofdefendantbanktodeposeonits

behalf.ItiscorrecttosuggestthatIamnothavinganyattorneyor

resolutioninmyfavourissuedbydefendantbank.

CSNo. 30/2013 DW1 Page1of5

It is correct tosuggest thatI havenopersonal knowledgein

respectofthetransactionsinquestionofyear2001sinceIwasnot

employedwithdefendantbank. IhaveneverbeenpostedinThane

BranchofdefendantbankinMumbai.Ihavealsonotbeenpostedin

VasantViharbranchofdefendant bankinNewDelhi.Inthecourse

ofmyofficialworkIhaveneveropenedtheaccountsindefendant's

bank.

Inpara3ofmyaffidavitIhavementionedaboutcompletionof

allformalitiesinopeningoftheaccountinquestion.IsaythatIam

not aware what all formalities were completed before opening the

accountinquestion.Vol.IamawarethatKYCdocumentsaretaken.

KYC is KnowYour Customer. I amnot aware whether KYC

norms were in operation in year 2001. Identity proof and address

proof are those documents whichare required as per KYCnorms.

Originalsofthecopiesofabovesaiddocumentsarealsoseenatthe

timeofopeningoftheaccount.Iamnotawarewhethertheaccount

openingformistobefilledinthebankbytheaccountholderatthe

time of opening of account. It is correct to suggest that original

documentsaretobeshownatthetimeofopeningofaccount.

Idonotknowthenameofbankofficialwhoopenedthe


accountinquestion,soIcannotadmitordenywhetherSh.Sachin

Pandirkar,bankofficialhadopenedtheaccountinquestion.Iamnot

awaresoIcannotadmitordenywhethertheaccountopeningform

partofMarkDX1(colly.)wasfilledupandsignedoutsidethebank

premises and given to Mr. Sachin Pandirkar, bank official, who

openedtheaccount.Itiscorrecttosuggestthatthereisnoimpression

ofanyphotographinthecopyofaccountopeningform,partofMark

DX1 (colly.). I do not know whether in year 2001 there was

requirementofaffixingphotographonaccountopeningform.Ihad

not opened my account before 2001. There is no need for any

introducerforopeningaccountbutKYCnormsaremandatory.Ido

notknowsoIcannotadmitordenythatin2001,therewasmandatory

requirementofintroducerforopeningtheaccountinquestion.It is

correcttosuggestthattherewasnointroducerforopeningtheaccount

inquestion. I donotknowsoI cannotadmitordenythataccount

opening form, part of MarkDX1(colly.) was filled by Mr. Sachin

Pandirkarinhisownhandwriting.IdonotknowsoIcannotadmitor

denythatnopersonofnameVijayJainexisted.Addressofaccount

holdermustbementionedintheaccountopeningform.Itiscorrectto

suggestthatintheaccountopeningform,copyMarkDX1(Colly.)no


addressofaccountholderismentioned.IamnotawareoftheFIR

registered against Mr. Sachin Pandirkar and other employee of

defendantbankinrespectofopeningofaccountinquestion.Idonot

knowsoIcannotadmitofdenywhetherSh.RajinderJaincametoMr.

SachinPandirkarbankemployeeandgotopenedaccountinquestion.

Inmypresence,thetransactionofopeningofaccountinquestionhad

nottakenplaceandIamnotawarewhatalltranspiredintheprocess

of openingof account in question or whoopened it andat whose

instanceitwassoopened. Icannotadmitordenywhetheroriginal

rationcardwasnotseenatthetimeofopeningofaccountinquestion.

It is correct to suggest that in the event of deposit and immediate

withdrawaloflargesuminnewopenedaccount,bankofficialsareto

bevigilantasperRBIguidelines.Icannotadmitordenythatcheque

book was delivered to Mahavir Impex in respect of account in

questionwithoutcompletingnecessaryformalitiesofbeingdelivered

toauthorisedperson.

It is incorrect to suggest that defendant bank is guilty of

negligence inopening theaccountinquestionand negligenceand

lachesbyhonouringandpassingthechequeindisputebearingno.

085949ofRs.947300/whichwasaforgedchequeafteritwasstolen


fromthepremisesofplaintiff.Withouthavingalookatstatementof

accountIamunabletosaythatintheaccountinquestiontherewere

only transactionsof deposit of aforesaidchequeandwithdrawalof

suchmoney.ItisincorrecttosuggestthatIamdeposingfalsely.


StatementofSh.AmolSharma,ld.counselfordefendantno.1.

AtBar

Iclosedefendant'sevidenceonbehalfofdefendantno.1.



MCA2/2013

Sh.VivekSawhneyVs.M/sBakulAgencies

15.04.2015

Statement of Sh. J.K. Chopra, ld. counsel for appellant, Enrl. No.

D/142/1964,ChamberNo.19,CivilWing,TisHazariCourts,Delhi

AtBar

UnderinstructionsIseektowithdrawthisappeal, with

libertytotakerecoursetoappropriateremedy,whateverispermissible

inlaw.


C.S.No.210/2014

HDFCBankVs.Mohd.Firoz

15.04.2015

StatementofSh.KumarRanjit,ld.counselforpetitioner;Enrl.No.

BR/2434/2012; Chamber No. 186 A, Western Wing, Tis Hazari

Courts,Delhi.

AtBar

Iseektowithdrawtheapplicationu/s9ofArbitrationand

ConciliationAct,1996,filedonbehalfofpetitionerbank.


C.S.No.212/2014

HDFCBankVs.AbhishekDhir

15.04.2015



Courts,Delhi.

AtBar



RO&AC (GurvinderPalSingh)ADJ1(Central)Delhi 15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.211/2014

HDFCBankVs.GurmeetSingh

15.04.2015



Courts,Delhi.

AtBar




C.S.No.213/2014

HDFCBankVs.AnmeetKaur

15.04.2015



Courts,Delhi.

AtBar




C.S.No.18/2015

HDFCBankVs.AjabSingh

15.04.2015



Courts,Delhi.

AtBar




do retrieved.asp(2)

Documents

kumar ranjit

withdrawal of application

arbitration andconciliationact

theapplicationus appellant

highcourt of delhi