divine or diabolical

1
Divine or Diabolical By David Saint-Onge This article is a re-printed from the April 2010 edition, as approved by the UP Business Today Which came first, the chicken or the egg? This age-old metaphor has been bandied about for everything from politics to econom- ics to education to religion. Despite the topic, this circular cause and consequence issue has recently grown into a new phenomenon as the current economic challenges of unemploy- ment, reduced demand, production slow- downs, and bankruptcies become increasingly ingrained into our daily lives. If you ask them, people are scared. They see Washington fighting for something that really pays no immediate dividends to anyone. They see their State government in disarray with continued talk of lower revenue sharing to municipalities and lower aid to K-12’s and institutions of higher learning. Heck, now there is talk of taxing the soda we drink and the athletic events we attend. It’s crazy out there and logic has nothing to do with it. Here in our local communities there is a grow- ing sense of urgency to get it right and to get it right now. Our collective ability to educate our children, process our wastewater, protect our citizens, and keep our communities vi- brant and healthy is slipping away. State revenue-sharing amounts are decreasing and we are desperately trying to keep doing what we do but with less money. Additionally, our local tax money is shrinking as property val- ues decline and businesses disappear. The basic community services we have always taken for granted are at-risk, and it’s time we understand the severity of the issue. Here at home we need to truly consider the consequences of America continuing to wal- low through all of 2010. If you recall, many economic pundits predicted the economy would suffer through 2009 and into the early part of 2010 before rebounding. But here we are through the end of the first quarter of 2010 and not much has been resolved. Unemploy- ment remains high, capital is tough to come by, and we’re arguing about universal health- care. With all this baggage, it may be time for all of us to start thinking out-of-the-box and for municipalities, school districts, and even businesses to consider consolidating opera- tions. If we don’t, we may find many will simply vanish. For those who only want what they already have and are not interested in thinking new thoughts, the only way for us to continue to enjoy the public services we currently enjoy is for States and the Federal government to raise taxes and/or debt. This approach has ramifi- cations. As I have argued, the State of Mich- igan cannot tax itself to solvency. This is a logical statement so perhaps I should explain. As Michigan struggles to reinvent itself, its revenues (taxes) have fallen sharply and its costs have risen extraordinarily. The loss of jobs, the demise of businesses, and citizens hoarding their money are all causal effects. Likewise, as unemployment remains high so does the cost to aid workers with unemploy- ment benefits. Furthermore, since govern- ment is people helping people, the public sector is inevitably slow at recognizing what the private sector knows all too well; you cannot keep staffers you cannot afford. In short, it may be some considerable time be- fore the State of Michigan coffers are flush with cash, consequently revenue-sharing will most likely continue to decline despite our best hopes. So in essence what comes first, economic upticks that allow workers to go back to work and businesses to expand, or do we tax every- one who is working more because more work- ers are not working? The chicken or the egg, that is the question. The ultimate way to heal what ails a strug- gling economy is to support businesses. Small business is the economic engine that will allow us to recover our economy. Busi- nesses will do business where they can pros- per. Business needs an environment of certainty to be profitable. Profits are then used to invest in new technology, employee compensation and training, and necessary infrastructure. If you give businesses these opportunities they will stimulate and move the economy forward. In a recent study conducted by CNBC, all 50 states were evaluated on the criteria for busi- ness growth and sustainability. In the order of priority (not my order but theirs), the criteria from high to low included: • Cost of Doing Business • Workforce • Quality of Life • Economy • Transportation and Infrastructure • Technology & Innovation • Education • Business Friendliness • Access to Capital • Cost of Living Michigan ranked 41st overall, scoring the highest in Technology and Innovation and the lowest in Economy. This overall ranking does not bode well for us at the local level because if the State cannot help itself, how will it help us? In a recent article by Cindy Perman published on CNBC entitled “What Do You Do with Detroit? Bulldoze It?” perhaps the answer for some is extreme. Apparently Detroit Mayor Dave Bing is working on a plan that would reconstitute select areas of the City into farm- land. Yes, farmland. The notion is the most desolate areas of the City are, for all intents and purposes, being abandoned. By bulldoz- ing these areas it will allow area residents to relocate to stronger neighborhoods and would give the City a chance to grow again. According to the article, “Things that were unthinkable are now becoming thinkable,” James W. Hughes, dean of the School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers Univer- sity, told the Associated Press. “There is now a realization that past glories are never going to be recaptured. Some people probably don’t accept that but that is the reality,” he said. As we all struggle to cope with an ever-chang- ing economic landscape one thing is sure, change is the norm. For local economies to maintain some semblance of service similar to what we’ve enjoyed for many years we need to consider alternatives, no matter how diffi- cult or inconvenient they may be. Such pro- posals, when considered, evaluated and presented for discussion by politicians, school board superintendents, university presidents, and municipalities, are neither divine nor dia- bolical, they may simply be a variation of the age-old metaphor - which comes first? By-line: David Saint-Onge is President and Principal Strategist for Black Ink Assets (www.blackinkassets.com), a business con- sulting company that enhances organizational performance, guides business growth, helps businesses understand productive sustainabil- ity, and serves business owners with effective business exit strategy planning and imple- mentation.

Upload: black-ink-assets

Post on 10-Mar-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

So in essence what comes first, economic upticks that allow workers to go back to work and businesses to expand, or do we tax every- one who is working more because more work- ers are not working? The chicken or the egg, that is the question. In a recent study conducted by CNBC, all 50 states were evaluated on the criteria for busi- ness growth and sustainability. In the order of priority (not my order but theirs), the criteria from high to low included:

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Divine or Diabolical

Divine or Diabolical�By David Saint-Onge� This article is a re-printed from the�

April 2010� edition, as approved by the UP Business Today�

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?�This age-old metaphor has been bandied�about for everything from politics to econom-�ics to education to religion. Despite the topic,�this circular cause and consequence issue has�recently grown into a new phenomenon as the�current economic challenges of unemploy-�ment, reduced demand, production slow-�downs, and bankruptcies become increasingly�ingrained into our daily lives.�

If you ask them, people are scared. They see�Washington fighting for something that really�pays no immediate dividends to anyone.�They see their State government in disarray�with continued talk of lower revenue sharing�to municipalities and lower aid to K-12’s and�institutions of higher learning. Heck, now�there is talk of taxing the soda we drink and�the athletic events we attend. It’s crazy out�there and logic has nothing to do with it.�

Here in our local communities there is a grow-�ing sense of urgency to get it right and to get�it right now. Our collective ability to educate�our children, process our wastewater, protect�our citizens, and keep our communities vi-�brant and healthy is slipping away. State�revenue-sharing amounts are decreasing and�we are desperately trying to keep doing what�we do but with less money. Additionally, our�local tax money is shrinking as property val-�ues decline and businesses disappear. The�basic community services we have always�taken for granted are at-risk, and it’s time we�understand the severity of the issue.�

Here at home we need to truly consider the�consequences of America continuing to wal-�low through all of 2010. If you recall, many�economic pundits predicted the economy�would suffer through 2009 and into the early�part of 2010 before rebounding. But here we�are through the end of the first quarter of 2010�and not much has been resolved. Unemploy-�ment remains high, capital is tough to come�by, and we’re arguing about universal health-�care. With all this baggage, it may be time for�all of us to start thinking out-of-the-box and�for municipalities, school districts, and even�businesses to consider consolidating opera-�tions. If we don’t, we may find many will�simply vanish.�

For those who only want what they already�have and are not interested in thinking new�

thoughts, the only way for us to continue to�enjoy the public services we currently enjoy is�for States and the Federal government to raise�taxes and/or debt. This approach has ramifi-�cations. As I have argued, the State of Mich-�igan cannot tax itself to solvency. This is a�logical statement so perhaps I should explain.�As Michigan struggles to reinvent itself, its�revenues (taxes) have fallen sharply and its�costs have risen extraordinarily. The loss of�jobs, the demise of businesses, and citizens�hoarding their money are all causal effects.�Likewise, as unemployment remains high so�does the cost to aid workers with unemploy-�ment benefits. Furthermore, since govern-�ment is people helping people, the public�sector is inevitably slow at recognizing what�the private sector knows all too well; you�cannot keep staffers you cannot afford. In�short, it may be some considerable time be-�fore the State of Michigan coffers are flush�with cash, consequently revenue-sharing will�most likely continue to decline despite our�best hopes.�

So in essence what comes first, economic�upticks that allow workers to go back to work�and businesses to expand, or do we tax every-�one who is working more because more work-�ers are not working? The chicken or the egg,�that is the question.�

The ultimate way to heal what ails a strug-�gling economy is to support businesses.�Small business is the economic engine that�will allow us to recover our economy. Busi-�nesses will do business where they can pros-�per. Business needs an environment of�certainty to be profitable. Profits are then�used to invest in new technology, employee�compensation and training, and necessary�infrastructure. If you give businesses these�opportunities they will stimulate and move�the economy forward.�

In a recent study conducted by CNBC, all 50�states were evaluated on the criteria for busi-�ness growth and sustainability. In the order of�priority (not my order but theirs), the criteria�from high to low included:�

• Cost of Doing Business�• Workforce�• Quality of Life�• Economy�• Transportation and Infrastructure�

• Technology & Innovation�• Education�• Business Friendliness�• Access to Capital�• Cost of Living�

Michigan ranked 41st overall, scoring the�highest in Technology and Innovation and the�lowest in Economy. This overall ranking�does not bode well for us at the local level�because if the State cannot help itself, how�will it help us?�

In a recent article by Cindy Perman published�on CNBC entitled “What Do You Do with�Detroit? Bulldoze It?” perhaps the answer for�some is extreme. Apparently Detroit Mayor�Dave Bing is working on a plan that would�reconstitute select areas of the City into farm-�land. Yes, farmland. The notion is the most�desolate areas of the City are, for all intents�and purposes, being abandoned. By bulldoz-�ing these areas it will allow area residents to�relocate to stronger neighborhoods and would�give the City a chance to grow again.�

According to the article, “Things that were�unthinkable are now becoming thinkable,”�James W. Hughes, dean of the School of�Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers Univer-�sity, told the Associated Press. “There is now�a realization that past glories are never going�to be recaptured. Some people probably don’t�accept that but that is the reality,” he said.�

As we all struggle to cope with an ever-chang-�ing economic landscape one thing is sure,�change is the norm. For local economies to�maintain some semblance of service similar to�what we’ve enjoyed for many years we need�to consider alternatives, no matter how diffi-�cult or inconvenient they may be. Such pro-�posals, when considered, evaluated and�presented for discussion by politicians, school�board superintendents, university presidents,�and municipalities, are neither divine nor dia-�bolical, they may simply be a variation of the�age-old metaphor - which comes first?�

By-line: David Saint-Onge is President and�Principal Strategist for Black Ink Assets�(www.blackinkassets.com), a business con-�sulting company that enhances organizational�performance, guides business growth, helps�businesses understand productive sustainabil-�ity, and serves business owners with effective�business exit strategy planning and imple-�mentation.�