diversity update 2010 september 2010
DESCRIPTION
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html. Diversity Update 2010 September 2010. Equity Scorecard Framework. http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html. Each of the four perspectives has an objective. From this objective we can: -Measure baseline performance Set an improvement target - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Diversity Update 2010
September 2010
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Equity Scorecard FrameworkAccess
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity
RetentionEquity in
Educational Outcomes
The Equity Scorecard was developed by Dr. Estela Mara Bensimon at the Center for Urban Education, University of Southern California (http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/CUE/).
Each of the four perspectives has an objective.
From this objective we can:-Measure baseline performance -Set an improvement target-Work towards equity in educational outcomes.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Identities for Analysis
Identities for AnalysisThis presentation is limited to identities for which we have quantitative information, including: Race/ethnicity Income level First-generation in college Gender Geographic diversity. Information is not systematically available for other groupsthat are important to inclusive excellence.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Diversity of:– Faculty– Staff– Administrators
• Climate
Access
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity
Retention
Institutional Receptivity
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
Employees self-identify their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.
Employees may choose any of the following designations, and may select more than one designation as of 2009:
• White• Black• Asian• American Indian• Hispanic/ Latino/a• Hawaiian
• A Campus survey was completed in 2009 to allow individuals to update their race/ethnic designation based on new reporting rules and the addition of Hawaiian/Pacific Islander to the race/ethnic categories.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
2010 data available in December 2010
Employees by Category
Executive/ Instructional OtherDirector/ Academic Academic Classified Employes- Graduate
Faculty Administrator Staff Staff Staff in-Training Assistants Total
WomenBlack 21 11 13 44 68 11 86 254Asian 64 4 77 193 128 105 540 1,111Native American 6 0 6 15 10 0 19 56Hispanic 32 8 21 53 131 20 132 397White/other 540 169 856 2,446 2,567 288 1,550 8,416Total 663 192 973 2,751 2,904 424 2,327 10,234
MenBlack 24 10 22 45 65 9 59 234Asian 167 1 81 192 111 230 718 1,500Native American 6 2 4 10 8 0 14 44Hispanic 44 8 32 42 155 28 122 431White/other 1,271 186 1,071 1,898 2,123 304 1,866 8,719Total 1,512 207 1,210 2,187 2,462 571 2,779 10,928
Total 2,175 399 2,183 4,938 5,366 995 5,106 21,162
2009 Headcount of Faculty and Staff by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
Source: October IADS data. Notes: Non-duplicating headcount reported- see Technical Note # 7. LTEs, Student and Unclassified hourly workers excluded. "White/other" includes people who chose not to report their race/ethnicity.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
2010 data available in December 2010
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Faculty Women 519 546 563 586 603 617 638 643 648 663
Men 1,655 1,667 1,662 1,650 1,635 1,603 1,572 1,555 1,530 1,512Total 2,174 2,213 2,225 2,236 2,238 2,220 2,210 2,198 2,178 2,175
Executive/Director/ Women 172 171 183 187 187 188 179 182 186 192Administrator Men 200 205 198 202 201 200 197 201 201 207
Total 372 376 381 389 388 388 376 383 387 399Instructional Women 776 763 793 795 836 876 871 901 942 973Academic Staff Men 1,113 1,099 1,123 1,088 1,113 1,162 1,152 1,147 1,197 1,210
Total 1,889 1,862 1,916 1,883 1,949 2,038 2,023 2,048 2,139 2,183Other Women 2,219 2,373 2,475 2,482 2,522 2,494 2,530 2,597 2,667 2,751Academic Staff Men 1,824 1,902 2,004 2,091 2,150 2,158 2,133 2,181 2,179 2,187
Total 4,043 4,275 4,479 4,573 4,672 4,652 4,663 4,778 4,846 4,938Classified Staff Women 2,833 2,876 2,902 2,887 2,872 2,852 2,829 2,843 2,866 2,904
Men 2,178 2,236 2,252 2,287 2,365 2,333 2,353 2,385 2,399 2,462Total 5,011 5,112 5,154 5,174 5,237 5,185 5,182 5,228 5,265 5,366
Employes-in-Training Women 261 275 281 282 314 324 324 325 361 424Men 466 437 459 460 485 489 503 482 507 571Total 727 712 740 742 799 813 827 807 868 995
Graduate Assistants Women 1,907 2,001 2,128 2,243 2,341 2,398 2,310 2,261 2,279 2,327Men 2,728 2,794 2,788 2,876 2,881 2,888 2,828 2,822 2,728 2,779Total 4,635 4,795 4,916 5,119 5,222 5,286 5,138 5,083 5,007 5,106
Total Women 8,687 9,005 9,325 9,462 9,675 9,749 9,681 9,752 9,949 10,234Men 10,164 10,340 10,486 10,654 10,830 10,833 10,738 10,773 10,741 10,928
Grand Total 18,851 19,345 19,811 20,116 20,505 20,582 20,419 20,525 20,690 21,162
Source: October EEO and IADS data. Notes: Non-duplicating headcount reported- see Technical Note #7. LTEs, Student and Unclassified hourly workers excluded.
Headcount of Faculty and Staff by Gender
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Faculty
2010 data available in December 2010
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Professor Women 233 262 269 275 283 291 298 303 307 312
Men 1,127 1,103 1,098 1,084 1,060 1,044 1,019 1,012 987 969% Women 17.1 19.2 19.7 20.2 21.1 21.8 22.6 23.0 23.7 24.4
Associate Professor Women 125 107 101 106 110 113 135 137 151 153Men 266 267 250 257 253 244 259 264 278 281% Women 32.0 28.6 28.8 29.2 30.3 31.7 34.3 34.2 35.2 35.3
Assistant Professor Women 161 177 193 204 210 213 202 202 190 198Men 262 296 314 309 319 315 294 279 265 262% Women 38.1 37.4 38.1 39.8 39.7 40.3 40.7 42.0 41.8 43.0
Instructor Women 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0Men 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Total Faculty Women 519 546 563 586 603 617 638 643 648 663Men 1,655 1,667 1,662 1,650 1,635 1,603 1,572 1,555 1,530 1,512Total 2,174 2,213 2,225 2,236 2,238 2,220 2,210 2,198 2,178 2,175
Women as Percent of Total Faculty 23.9 24.7 25.3 26.2 26.9 27.8 28.9 29.3 29.8 30.5
Faculty Headcount by Rank and Gender
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%Women as Percent of Faculty by Rank
Professor Associate Assistant
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Faculty
•Increase in the percent of faculty hires that are minority hires.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Perc
ent
Year of Hire
UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status
Minority Faculty Non-Asian Minority Faculty
Madison Plan
Strategic HiresSHI - 2
2010 data available in December 2010
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Faculty
•In 2009: 2,175 total faculty members
•16.8% (364) of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities.
•7.2% increase in minority faculty since 1996
2010 data available in December 2010
Black, 2.1% (45)
Asian,10.6% (231)
American Indian, 0.6% (12)
Hispanic/Latino/a, 3.5% (76)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty Headcount
16.8%16.9%16.2%
9.6%10.1% 10.5%
11%
12.1%13.2%
13.8%14.3%14.6%15.1%
15.4%
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
•In 2009, 2,183 Instructional Academic Staff members
•11.7% (256) of Instructional Academic Staff are racial/ethnic minorities
•2.6% increase in minority instructional academic staff since 1996
2010 data available in December 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
11.7%12.1%11.2%
11.9%11.5%
10.5%9.8%
8.8%8.9%8.8%8.1%7.7%8.2%
9.1%
Black,1.6% (35)
Asian,7.2% (158)
American Indian,.5% (10)
Hispanic/Latino/a,2.4% (53)
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
•In 2009: 4,938 non-instructional Academic Staff
•12% of non-instructional Academic Staff are minorities
•3.4% increase in minority non-instructional academic staff since 1996
2010 data available in December 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Minority Other Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
Hispanic/ Latino/a, 1.9% (95)
AmericanIndian, .5% (25)
Asian,7.8% (385)
Black,1.8% (89)
12%12%11.7%11.2%11.1%10.9%
10.2%9.6%9.4%9.2%8.8%
8.3%8.7%8.6%
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
•In 2009: 5,366 Classified Staff members
•12.6% (676) of classified staff are minorities
•8.4% increase in minority classified staff since 1996
2010 data available in December 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
12.6%12%11.8%11.3%11%
10%9.1%
8.5%8.1%7%
6.1%5.2%4.8%
4.2%
Hispanic/ Latino/a, 5.3% (286)
American Indian,.3% (18)
Asian, 4.5% (239)
Black,2.5% (133)
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
•In 2009: 399 Executive/Director/Administrators
•11.2% of Executive/Director/Administrators are racial/ethnic minorities
•Slight increase in the proportion who are minorities.
2010 data available in December 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Minority Executive/Director/Administrators as a Percent of the Total Headcount
Hispanic/Latino/a, 4.1% (16)
American Indian, .5% (2)Asian, 1.3% (5)
Black,5.3% (21)
11.2%11.6%11.2%11.2%
10.8%10.8%11.1%
10.2%10.9%
11.1%10.6%10%
9.8%10.5%
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
• Minority faculty members make up almost 17% of all faculty members.
• This is the largest proportion among the various employment groups.
2010 data available in December 2010
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
ent o
f Tot
al
Minorities as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff
Faculty
Instructional Academic Staff
Classified Staff
Other Academic Staff
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
2010 data available in December 2010
-Women made up around 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.
-A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (30%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Total Faculty Exec/Dir/ Admin
Instructional Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff Classified
Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
Minority Women
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
2010 data available in December 2010
-Around 13% of all employees are minorities
-A larger proportion of faculty are minorities, especially among men.
0
5
10
15
20
Total Faculty Exec/Dir/ Admin
Instructional Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff Classified
Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Gender and Employee Type
Women Men
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• For these rates, those that did not receive tenure include the following:– Those who were denied
tenure– Those who left the university
for another position elsewhere
– A few faculty members still hold probationary appointments after 9 years.
• Tenure and promotion rates are calculated at 6 and 9 years after hire, in order to allow for those who have extensions on the tenure clock.
• Data for tenure charts in this slideshow combine hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04 or 1991-92 to 2003-04. This is necessary due to the small number of faculty, especially women and minority faculty, who are hired within a division in a given year.
• Small Ns make tenure/promotion rates subject to large variation.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.htmlNotes about faculty promotion data:
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• At 9 years, 64% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.
54%
71%
41%
64%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
6 Years 9 Years
Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender,within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
Men Women
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1991-92 to 2003-04
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies.
• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is within the Physical Sciences division.
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04
71%74%
80%78%
56%
64%
75% 68%80%
48%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division
Men Women
N=470 N=256
N=130
N=174N=70
N=25 N=84N=79
N=113
N=82
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
50%
69%
48%
64%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
6 Years 9 Years
Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
Non-Minority Minority
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• At 9 Years, 64% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure. Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1991-92 to 2003-04
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• A lower percentage of faculty members are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies division.
• The largest gap in tenure rates by minority status is within the Physical Sciences and Arts and Humanities.
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
61%67% 70% 67%
46%
65%71%
82%79%
54%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Minority Status and Division
Minority Non-Minority
N=144 N=582N=31
N=213 N=39
N=116
N=37
N=126
N=37N=158
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• Selecting a divisional affiliation is a step in the tenure process. Faculty are not required to identify their divisional affiliation at the time of hire, but many do.
• Women, especially minority women, are heavily concentrated within the Social Studies Division
• See next slide for numbers of faculty by division, gender, and minority status
Note: Chart excludes 41 faculty members who have not yet selected a disciplinary division, as they are not required to do so until they go up for tenure. Data as of October 2009 payroll.
3135
2227
15 14 2928
3427
911
19 24 40 34
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Minority Male Non-Minority Male Minority Female Non-Minority Female
Faculty Disciplinary Division Affiliation, by Minority Status and Gender
Social Studies
Physical Sciences
Arts and Humanities
BiologicalSciences
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• Women, especially minority women, are heavily concentrated within the Social Studies Division
• See previous slide for percent by division
Note: Chart excludes 41 faculty members who have not yet selected a disciplinary division, as they are not required to do so until they go up for tenure. Data as of October 2009 payroll.
75
37
82
4526 3411 48
437
178
339
299
142 149
55
177
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Biological Sciences Arts and Humanities Physical Science Social Studies
Number of Faculty by Disciplinary Division, Gender, and Minority Status
Minority Male Minority Female Non-Minority Male Non-Minority Female
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04
60 60
7166
45
62
81
6369
47
71 71
84
76
57
64
7174
81
49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division
Minority Men Minority Women Non-Minority Men Non-Minority Women
65Arts and Humanities
Social Studies
Total
17
18
5
13
Number of Faculty Promoted to Tenure
20
19
34
18
Non-MinorityMinority
61
6593
156
96Physical Sciences
203
57
20
WomenMenWomenMen
Biological Sciences
91 53 410
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• All groups have lower promotion rates within the Social Studies division.
• Women, and especially minority women, are more likely to be within the social studies division.
• For groups with small hiring pools, the effect of one person’s tenure/non-tenure can affect the percent tenured dramatically.
• Those not receiving tenure includes those who took a position elsewhere or still have a probationary appointment after 9 years.
Key findings from tenure/promotion data:
Institutional Receptivity:
Peer Comparisons
for Faculty Diversity
(N = 492)(N = 307)(N = 370)
(N = 211)(N = 600)(N = 714)(N = 522)(N = 471)(N = 674)
(N = 403)(N = 361)
(N = 778)(N = 270)(N = 648)(N = 577)(N = 1,097)(N = 755)(N = 666)(N = 403)(N = 597)(N = 597)(N = 586)(N = 744)(N = 622)
(N = 1,187)(N = 747)(N = 1,239)
(N = 1,096)(N = 920)
(N = 773)(N = 662)(N = 777)
(N = 1,952)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
WisconsinIndianaVirginiaOregon
North CarolinaWashington
KansasArizona
Penn StateSUNY - Stony Brook
NebraskaOhio State
UC - Santa BarbaraTexas A & M
IowaFlorida
MissouriMichigan StateSUNY - Buffalo
IllinoisUC - Berkeley
Iowa StateUC- Davis
UC - San DiegoMinnesota
TexasPittsburgh
UCLAMaryland
PurdueUC- Irvine
RutgersMichigan
Percent Non-White Faculty 50%Non-White Full-Time
Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, 2008
Average Percent Non-White Faculty for AAU Public Institutions: 25.5%
Source: IPEDS Fall HR, 2008-09http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Climate
Some Recent Climate Studies
• UW-Madison participation in UW System Climate Study Pilot Project (limited to CALS and Office of Student Life), 2010-11
• Letters & Science Climate Study, 2009-10; with linkages to STEM, teaching and learning communities
• CALS Climate Study, 2008-09• NSSE Survey includes many climate-related
questions, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011 (planned)• WISELI Studies and Programs, on-going since 2002
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Climate
Participation in the UW System Climate Study, 2010-11• UW-Madison is participating in Tier III of the UW System Climate Study• Initiated by UWSA at the request of the Board of Regents• Tier I was implemented in 2008-09. Tier II was implemented in 2009-10.
• Questionnaire will go to all employees and students in Spring 2011;
responses are anonymous and confidential• For logistical reasons, the study will be fielded only in CALS and Division
of Student Life • Reports are expected in summer 2011• Campus oversight by a “Diversity Leadership Committee”• Institutional implementation by the “Climate Study Working Group”• More detail: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/diversity/ClimateStudy.html
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Climate
Selected NSSE Results
** significantly different
Percent of Seniors who often or very much:
See: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/performance_students_surveys.html
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how it looks from their perspective
Included diverse perspectives in class discussion or assignments
Had serious conversations with student of a different race or ethnicity than your own
63
54
65
61
56
46
62
56
48
AllNon-MinorityMinority
**
Institutional Receptivity: Climate
Selected NSSE Results
** significantly different
Percent of Seniors for whom the university emphasizes quite a bit or very much:
See: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/performance_students_surveys.html
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds
Helping you cope with non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc)
Providing the support you need to thrive socially
Providing the support you need to succeed academically
38
25
40
65
41
17
37
64
41
18
37
66
AllNon-minorityMinority
**
Equity Scorecard FrameworkAccess
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity
RetentionEquity in
Educational Outcomes
The Equity Scorecard was developed by Dr. Estela Mara Bensimon at the Center for Urban Education, University of Southern California (http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/CUE/).
In 2010-11 UW-Madison will formally participate in the Equity Scorecard framework.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Diversity Update 2010
• Slideshow available at http://www.apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Questions about these slides:– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])