dissipative materials, ilyushin's postulate and...

68
Joe Goddard University of California, San Diego Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLASTICITY 2006 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada July 17-22, 2006 DISSIPATIVE MATERIALS, ILYUSHIN'S POSTULATE AND HYPOPLASTICITY

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Joe GoddardUniversity of California, San Diego

    Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering

    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLASTICITY 2006Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

    July 17-22, 2006

    DISSIPATIVE MATERIALS, ILYUSHIN'S POSTULATE AND HYPOPLASTICITY

  • Overview & Summary• Objectives are to:

    explore specific forms of a general continuum model proposed over 20 years ago* to describe “curious” rheological effects in nominally Stokesian suspensions,

    provide a continuum framework for further micromechanical modeling and experiment on the viscoplasticity of suspensions and granular media, and

    consider implications for the modeling of more general elastoplastic bodies.

    *Adv. Coll. Interface Sci. 17, 241,1982; JNNFM,14,141, 1984 (J. Fluid Mech., 2006).

  • Review of the Rheologyof

    Stokesian Suspensions

    (Generalized Einstein Problem)

  • Standard model of Stokesian suspensions*

    *Note the analogy to elasticity of solid composites.

  • Standard model of Stokesian suspensions*

    *Note the analogy to elasticity of solid composites.

  • Standard model of Stokesian suspensions*

    *Note the analogy to elasticity of solid composites.

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13

    τ

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13

    τ

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13N1

    τ

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13N1

    τ

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13N1 N2

    τ

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13N1 N2

    τ

  • Viscometric flows(simple-shear) of“simple fluids”

    2

    13N1 N2

    τ

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shear

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shearHusband & Gadala-Maria, J.Rheol. 31, 95,1987

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shearHusband & Gadala-Maria, J.Rheol. 31, 95,1987

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shearHusband & Gadala-Maria, J.Rheol. 31, 95,1987

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shearHusband & Gadala-Maria, J.Rheol. 31, 95,1987

    Linear normal stress in simple shear

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shearHusband & Gadala-Maria, J.Rheol. 31, 95,1987

    Linear normal stress in simple shearZarraga, I. et al., J.Rheol. 44,

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shearHusband & Gadala-Maria, J.Rheol. 31, 95,1987

    Linear normal stress in simple shearZarraga, I. et al., J.Rheol. 44, 185, 2000, anticipated in JDG 1982.

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shearHusband & Gadala-Maria, J.Rheol. 31, 95,1987

    Linear normal stress in simple shearZarraga, I. et al., J.Rheol. 44, 185, 2000, anticipated in JDG 1982.

    ≡ κ

  • Rheological “curiosities” in sphere suspensions

    Viscosity recovery on shear reversalGadala-Maria and Acrivos, J.Rheol. 24,799,1980

    Anisotropic structure in simple shearHusband & Gadala-Maria, J.Rheol. 31, 95,1987

    Linear normal stress in simple shearZarraga, I. et al., J.Rheol. 44, 185, 2000, anticipated in JDG 1982.

    ≡ κ

  • Partial reversal and recovery of shear and normal forceson reversal of steady shearing*

    *Kolli, G. et al. J. Rheol., 46, 321, 2002

    (normalized torque and axial thrust in torsional split-ring apparatus)

  • Partial reversal and recovery of shear and normal forceson reversal of steady shearing*

    *Kolli, G. et al. J. Rheol., 46, 321, 2002

    (normalized torque and axial thrust in torsional split-ring apparatus)

    • As discussed below, torque and thrust

  • Partial reversal and recovery of shear and normal forceson reversal of steady shearing*

    *Kolli, G. et al. J. Rheol., 46, 321, 2002

    (normalized torque and axial thrust in torsional split-ring apparatus)

    • As discussed below, torque and thrust should abruptly change sign but not

  • Partial reversal and recovery of shear and normal forceson reversal of steady shearing*

    *Kolli, G. et al. J. Rheol., 46, 321, 2002

    (normalized torque and axial thrust in torsional split-ring apparatus)

    • As discussed below, torque and thrust should abruptly change sign but not value for Stokesian suspensions.

  • Proposed continuum model* :1.) Strictly dissipative material with memory

    2.) but no characteristic time

    *JDG, Adv. Coll. Interface Sci. 17, 241,1982 & JNNFM,14,141,1984

  • Proposed continuum model* :1.) Strictly dissipative material with memory

    2.) but no characteristic time

    *JDG, Adv. Coll. Interface Sci. 17, 241,1982 & JNNFM,14,141,1984

    • Note instantaneous reversal of stress vs. strain

  • Proposed continuum model* :1.) Strictly dissipative material with memory

    2.) but no characteristic time

    *JDG, Adv. Coll. Interface Sci. 17, 241,1982 & JNNFM,14,141,1984

    • Note instantaneous reversal of stress vs. strain (dictated by “Stokesian reversibility”).

  • Model (continued)

  • Model (continued)

  • Model (continued)

  • Model (continued)

    cf. F. Tatsuoka et al. 2005, P. Jop et al. 2005

  • Model (continued)

  • Model (continued)

  • Model (continued)

    * Huang, N. et al. PRL, 94, 028301, 2005; Tsai & Gollub, PRE, 70, 031303, 2004.

  • Model (continued)

    * Huang, N. et al. PRL, 94, 028301, 2005; Tsai & Gollub, PRE, 70, 031303, 2004.

  • Simplified Modelfor

    Stokesian Suspensions

  • Assumed model

    n

  • Assumed model

    n

  • Assumed model

    *Cowin, S. C., Mech. Materials, 4,137, 1985.

    n

  • Inferences fromStokesian dynamics

  • Inferences fromStokesian dynamics

  • Inferences fromStokesian dynamics

  • Postulatedevolution ofanisotropy

  • Postulatedevolution ofanisotropy

  • Postulatedevolution ofanisotropy

  • Postulatedevolution ofanisotropy

  • Reversal of steady shearing*

  • Reversal of steady shearing*

    *cf. Coleman and Dill, JMPS, 1971: index of refraction tensor in simple materials.

  • Reversal of steady shearing*

    *cf. Coleman and Dill, JMPS, 1971: index of refraction tensor in simple materials.

  • Reversal of steady shearing*

    *cf. Coleman and Dill, JMPS, 1971: index of refraction tensor in simple materials.

  • Comparison to Experimentswith Reversal of Steady Shear

  • Experimental details*

    * Kolli, G. et al. J. Rheol., 46, 321, 2002; split-ring shear cell

    relativetorque

    relativethrust

  • Experimental details*

    * Kolli, G. et al. J. Rheol., 46, 321, 2002; split-ring shear cell

    relativetorque

    relativethrust

  • Nonlinear least-squares fit with two relaxation modes

    • Inferred ratio of normal stresses N2! / N1! ≈ 10 for data on right is out of range of other experiments, possibly due to split-ring geometry of Kolli et al.

    • One relaxation strain is ≈ 1, reflecting large-scale rearrangement, but one is ≈ 0.0001, accounting for incomplete reversal of stress and representing another Stokesian symmetry breaking, e.g. by short-range interparticle forces, of a type employed in “Stokesian dynamics” simulations.

  • Remarks on data fitting*

    * http://www.levenspiel.com/octave/elephant.htm

    “… spoilsports like to quote the statementattributed to … Gauss…

    ‘Give me four parameters, and I will draw an elephant for you; with five I shall have him raise and lower his trunk and his tail.’

    Wei (1) challenged this assertion andproceeded to draw the best elephant hecould with various numbers of parameters.Here … his results with 5, 10, 20 and 30adjustable parameters.

    (1) J. Wei, Chemtech,1975, May 128-IBC …”

  • Remarks on data fitting*

    * http://www.levenspiel.com/octave/elephant.htm

    “… spoilsports like to quote the statementattributed to … Gauss…

    ‘Give me four parameters, and I will draw an elephant for you; with five I shall have him raise and lower his trunk and his tail.’

    Wei (1) challenged this assertion andproceeded to draw the best elephant hecould with various numbers of parameters.Here … his results with 5, 10, 20 and 30adjustable parameters.

    (1) J. Wei, Chemtech,1975, May 128-IBC …”

  • Conclusions

    ** cf. Phan-Thien, N, J. Rheol., 1995, for a dense suspension model.

    *JDG, JNNFM,14,141,1984.

    **

  • Conclusions for suspension and granular media

    ** cf. Phan-Thien, N, J. Rheol., 1995, for a dense suspension model.

    *JDG, JNNFM,14,141,1984.

    **

  • Possible consequences for more general elastoplasticity

    (J. Rice, 2004)

  • Possible consequences (cont’d)

  • Possible consequences (cont’d)