dissertation aerosol effects on cloud · pdf filedissertation . aerosol effects on...

283
DISSERTATION AEROSOL EFFECTS ON CLOUD-PRECIPITATION AND LAND-SURFACE PROCESSES Submitted by Toshihisa Matsui Department of Atmospheric Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2007

Upload: truongdien

Post on 18-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • DISSERTATION

    AEROSOL EFFECTS ON CLOUD-PRECIPITATION AND LAND-SURFACE

    PROCESSES

    Submitted by

    Toshihisa Matsui

    Department of Atmospheric Science

    In partial fulfillment of the requirements

    For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

    Colorado State University

    Fort Collins, Colorado

    Spring 2007

  • ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION

    AEROSOL EFFECTS ON CLOUD-PRECIPITATION AND LAND-SURFACE

    PROCESSES

    Aerosols not only directly scatter and absorb solar radiation (denoted as the

    aerosol direct effects), but also modulate cloud properties by acting as cloud

    condensation nuclei (CCN) to form cloud droplets (denoted as the aerosol indirect

    effects). High concentrations of aerosols can overseed cloud droplets to reduce the mean

    size of cloud droplets, which is hypothesized to increase cloud albedo for the constant

    cloud liquid water path thereby slowing the warm-rain processes. The first part of this

    dissertation examines the sensitivity of the aerosol indirect effect to different

    thermodynamic environments over the tropical ocean. The variability of marine warm

    cloud properties is derived from satellite multiple sensors, and is normalized by the

    variability of satellite-derived aerosol index (AI) and reanalysis-derived lower-

    tropospheric stability (LTS). Global statistics show that increases in AI (polluted air) are

    associated with reductions in the cloud droplet effective radius (Re), supporting the

    hypothesis of the aerosol indirect effect. Increase in LTS (strong lower-troposphere

    stability) is also associated with reductions in the Re, indicating that the stronger

    inversion prevents dynamical growth of cloud droplets. Marine warm rain processes are

    iii

  • estimated from the comparison between cloud-top and column Re, and the global

    statistics indicate that the warm-rain processes are minimized regardless of the air

    pollution under a strong temperature inversion, while they are inhibited due to air

    pollution under unstable thermodynamic conditions. The cloud liquid water path (CLWP)

    tends to be decreased for higher AI, which does not support the assumption of constant

    CLW associated with the reduction of Re. Global variability of corrected cloud albedo

    (CCA: the product of cloud optical depth and cloud fraction) is better explained by the

    variability of the LTS than by AI. CCA appear to be highest under the strong-inversion

    regions, and is the first-order property that controls the radiation budget. Local variability

    of these cloud properties is explained by a combination of AI and LTS better than by

    either AI or LTS alone. Finally, the spatial mean and the spatial gradient of the aerosol

    direct and indirect radiative forcing are estimated and compared with the forcing

    attributed to well-mixed greenhouse gases (GHG) over the tropical ocean.

    The aerosol direct effect not only reduces global irradiance but also increases

    diffuse radiation. Diffuse radiation is more homogeneously absorbed by the plant canopy

    and more efficiently utilized for the plant photosynthesis process than direct radiation.

    Thus, aerosol loading is expected to increase plant productivity (the aerosol diffuse-

    radiation effect). The second part of this dissertation examines the spatio-temoporal

    variability of the aerosol diffuse-radiation effect over the eastern U.S., using a sun-shade

    canopy model. First, satellite and model aerosol optical depth (AOD) products are

    assimilated via an optimal interpolation technique, and a comparison against the ground-

    based observations shows that the satellite-model assimilated AOD product is superior to

    either a satellite or model product. Second, surface albedo, surface radiative temperature,

    iv

  • CO2 flux, and sensible/latent heat fluxes in a sun-shade canopy model (Unified Land

    Model: ULM) are compared with corresponding satellite and ground-based observations.

    Tuning parameters in ULM are constrained by reducing model-observation discrepancies

    via the Gauss-Maquardt-Levemberg automatic optimization algorithm. Third, the well-

    calibrated ULM is run in an off-line model for the warm seasons in 2000 and 2001.

    Downwelling shortwave radiation is computed with (a control experiment) and without (a

    potential experiment) assimilated daily AOD in all-sky conditions. The sensitivity

    experiments (control-potential) show that aerosol loading increases plant productivity in

    mixed forests and deciduous broadleaf forests in the southeastern U.S., while plant

    productivity is decreased over the croplands and grasslands. The spatio-temporal

    variability of aerosol diffuse-radiation effect is well explained by the variability of LAI,

    cloud optical depth, near-surface atmospheric temperature, and diurnal cycles. Due to the

    combination of the positive and negative effects, the aerosol diffuse-radiation effect

    increases plant productivity by only +0.5% in 2001 and 0.09% in 2000 from the

    potential experiment over the eastern U.S.

    Toshihisa Matsui Atmospheric Science Department

    Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523

    Spring 2007

    v

  • Table of Contents

    Abstract iii

    Table of Contents vi

    List of Tables xi

    List of Figures xiii

    Acknowledgements xxi

    1 Introduction 1

    1.1 Overview of Aerosol Effects on Climate . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

    1.2 Motivations and Overviews of Chapters . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    2 Satellite-based Assessment of Impact of Aerosols and Atmospheric

    Thermodynamics on Warm Rain Process 17

    2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    2.2 TRMM-Derived Cloud Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

    2.3 Sensitivity of the Aerosol-Cloud Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

    2.4 Summary and Perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

    References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

    3 Satellite-Based Assessment of Marin Low Cloud Variability Associated With

    Aerosol, Thermodynamics, and Diurnal Cycle 31

    3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

    3.2 Datasets and Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

    3.2.1 Lower-Tropospheric Stability (LTS) from the NCEP Reanalysis 34

    vi

  • 3.2.2 Aerosol Index from MODIS and GOCART . . . . . . . . . 36

    3.2.3 Marine Low Cloud Properties from the TRMM Satellite . . . 40

    3.2.4 Method of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

    3.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

    3.3.1 Global Statistics Among Cloud Properties, LTS and AI . . . 45

    3.3.2 Local Statistics Between Cloud Properties, AI and LTS . . . 52

    3.3.3 Diurnal Cycle of Cloud Properties in Different LTS and AI Regions 57

    3.4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

    Symbols and Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

    References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

    4 Measurement-Based Estimation of The Spatial Mean and Gradient of Aerosol

    Radiative Forcing 77

    4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

    4.2 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

    4.3 Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

    4.3.1 Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing (ADRF) . . . . . . . . . 80

    4.3.2 Aerosol Indirect Radiative Forcing (AIRF) . . . . . . . . . 82

    4.4 Spatial Mean Radiative Forcing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84

    4.5 Spatial Gradient of Radiative Forcing . . . . . . . . . . . . 86

    4.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

    References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90

    5 Regional Comparison and Assimilation of GOCART and MODIS Aerosol

    Optical Depth across the Eastern U.S. 93

    vii

  • 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93

    5.2 Data . . . . . . .