discussions and decisions on decidim barcelona
TRANSCRIPT
Discussions and decisions on Decidim
Data Analysis of participatory democracy in Barcelona
Pablo AragónUniversitat Pompeu FabraEurecat - Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya
The Impacts of Civic Technology Conference25-26 April 2017, Florence
3
Decidim.Barcelona as a platform
https://decidim.barcelona
Barandiaran, X (2016) Què és decidim?https://www.bcnparticipa.cat/JornadesMetadecidim/es/materials.php
Decidim.Barcelona is the online platform for participatory democracy by the Barcelona City Council
○ Strategic city planning○ Citizen initiatives○ Participatory budgeting○ Public consultations
Decidim.Barcelona is the largest free software project by the BarcelonaCity Council
○ Agile development○ Digital sovereignty○ Collaborative public-common
infrastructure
4
Decidim.Barcelona as a software
https://github.com/AjuntamentdeBarcelona
Barandiaran, X (2016) Què és decidim?https://www.bcnparticipa.cat/JornadesMetadecidim/es/materials.php
Decidim.Barcelona is an open and collaborative community/ecosystem of citizens
○ Hackers○ Civic associations○ City Council workers○ SMEs
5
Decidim.Barcelona as a community
Barandiaran, X (2016) Què és decidim?https://www.bcnparticipa.cat/JornadesMetadecidim/es/materials.php
● Strategic city planning for the present legislature (2015-2019)
● Participatory processes in Feb-Apr 2016
● 10.860 proposals grouped by:○ source: city Council, civic Associations,
offline meetings, individual citizens
○ topic: welfare, economy, justice, etc.
○ scope: city, district
● 18.191 comments and 165.087 supports7
Programa d’Actuació Municipal
https://www.decidim.barcelona/processes/pam
City Council >> Civic Associations > Offline meetings >> Individual citizens
8
Data Analysis: Source and topic
9
There were offline meetings in every district of Barcelona
Every district held offline meetings with different thematic axis
Data Analysis: Offline meetings
● The City Hall is the most central actor in the discussion network for the Strategic City Plan (PAM)
● However, the largest community is built by individual citizens
● Small but relevant communities around civic associations
10
Data Analysis: Community structure
Hybrid discussion interface: Threaded + (Counter)argumentation
11
Data Analysis: Online deliberation
Deliberative structural properties of online discussion threads
12
Data Analysis: Online deliberation
Gonzalez-Bailon, S, Kaltenbrunner, A, & Banchs, R (2010)
The structure of political discussion networks: a model for the analysis of online deliberation
Journal of Information Technology, 25:230–243
13
Data Analysis: Online deliberation
Aragón, P, Gómez, V, & Kaltenbrunner, A (2016)Visualization Tool for Collective Awareness in a Platform of Citizen Proposals
ICWSM 2016 – The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Cologne, Germany
Few counterarguments but more likely to trigger deliberative discussions
14
Data Analysis: Online deliberation
15
Conclusion
● Proposals from collaborative sources were more likely to be accepted
● The hybridization of offline/online dynamics became essential
● Relevant social implications of platform design
○ Features for counter-argumentation increased online deliberation
16
The principles of Civic Tech
Technology that enables engagement or participation of the public for stronger development, enhancing citizen communications, improving government infrastructure, and generally improving the public good
Civic_technology (Wikipedia)
Patel, M, Sotsky, J, Gourley, S, & Houghton, D (2013)The emergence of civic tech: Investments in a growing field
The Knight Foundation
17
Sovereignty: Beyond the principles of Civic Tech
MetaDecidim is a process in Decidim.Barcelona in which the own community
● proposes
● discusses
● analyzes
● decides
the next features to be developed in the platform
https://meta.decidim.barcelona