discussion paper groundwater data in the sgma context · 2 workshop objectives stanford...

8
Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT Identifying Groundwater Data Needs, Challenges and Potential Solutions Prepared by: Tara Moran and Janny Choy This report was prepared as background information for the second workshop in a four-part series focusing on groundwater data in the SGMA context. This series is hosted by Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in conjunction with California State University Sacramento’s Center for Collaborative Policy at Stanford University. January 28-29, 2016

Upload: others

Post on 13-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT · 2 Workshop Objectives Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in partnership

DiscussionPaper

GROUNDWATERDATAINTHESGMACONTEXTIdentifyingGroundwaterDataNeeds,Challengesand

PotentialSolutions

Preparedby:TaraMoranandJannyChoy

Thisreportwaspreparedasbackgroundinformationforthesecondworkshopinafour-partseriesfocusingongroundwaterdataintheSGMAcontext.Thisseriesis

hostedbyStanfordUniversity’sWaterintheWestProgramandtheGouldCenterforConflictResolution,inconjunctionwithCaliforniaStateUniversitySacramento’s

CenterforCollaborativePolicyatStanfordUniversity.

January28-29,2016

Page 2: Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT · 2 Workshop Objectives Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in partnership

GroundwaterDataunderSGMA:BackgroundReport Jan.28-29,2016

2

TableofContents

1 IntroductiontoGroundwaterManagementinCalifornia.................................32 WorkshopObjectives.....................................................................................................4

3 DataRequirementsunderSGMA...............................................................................5Box1.AvoidingUndesirableResultsunderSGMA

Box2.Groundwater-SurfaceWaterConnectivityinCalifornia

4 SummaryofGroundwaterDataSurveyResults...................................................75 References.........................................................................................................................8

6 AdditionalReadingonGroundwater-SurfaceWaterInteractions.................8Cover photos courtesy of the Bureau of Reclamation, Chris Austin, and DWR, 2015/Kelly M.Grow.

Page 3: Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT · 2 Workshop Objectives Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in partnership

GroundwaterDataunderSGMA:BackgroundReport Jan.28-29,2016

3

1 IntroductiontoGroundwaterManagementinCaliforniaGroundwateriscriticaltoCalifornia’swellbeing.Itprovides40to60percentofthestate’swatersupply,contributestostreamflow,andsupportsadiversityofplantsandanimals.California’saquifersalsostoreagreatdealofwater–aboutanorderofmagnitudemorethantotalsurfacestoragecombined(DWR2003).Theseunderground“reservoirs”aretypicallyreferredtoasreservesforuseduringtimesofscarcity.However,fouryearsofextremedroughtcombinedwithalong-termoverrelianceontheresourcehaveleftgroundwaterlevelsinmostgroundwaterbasinsinthestateatall-timehistoricallows(DWR2014).Despitegroundwater’simportancetothestate’swatersupplysystem,thestatelackedacomprehensiveregimeforregulatingtheresource1untilpassageoftheSustainableGroundwaterManagementAct(SGMA)in2014.SGMAprovidesastatewideframeworkforthemonitoringandmanagementofCalifornia’s515alluvialgroundwateraquifers.Thelegislationrequiresallhigh-andmedium-prioritygroundwaterbasinslistedinCaliforniaDepartmentofWaterResources(DWR)Bulletin118tobemanagedunderagroundwatersustainabilityplan(GSP)byJanuary31,2022.2Ofthe515basinsidentifiedinBulletin118,43areclassifiedashigh-priorityand84asmedium-priority.Takentogether,these127basinsencompassapproximately96percentofgroundwateruseand88percentofpopulationinthestate(DWR2014).Remainingbasinsareclassifiedaslow-orverylow-priority.3PriortopassageofSGMA,groundwatermanagementinCaliforniawasapatchworkoflocalmanagementarrangements.Thelackofacomprehensiveframeworkhasresultedinfragmentedmanagement.GroundwaterinCaliforniaiscurrentlymanagedbyapproximately2,300independentlocalagencies(Nelson,2012).Despitehavingoverlappingjurisdictionsoradjacentboundaries,manywatermanagementagenciesdonotcoordinategroundwaterdataormanagementefforts,resultinginmanagementfragmentation,inefficiency,difficultyinevaluatingwatershed-scaleimpacts,competitionforlimitedstatefundingandtechnicalassistance,andinconsistencyinplanning(Blomquist1992;Heikkila2004;GerlakandHeikkila2011;Nelson2012).Previouseffortstoaddressthisfragmentationhavebeenlimitedbythevoluntarynatureofgroundwatermanagementprograms(e.g.,theIntegratedRegionalWaterManagementProgram,AB3030,AB1938)andthelackofconsistentresources(HughesandPincetl2014).ImplementationofSGMAprovideswatermanagersandthestatewithauniqueopportunitytoachievesustainablegroundwatermanagementandensurelong-termprotectionofthiscriticalresource.Inmanycases,SGMAwillrequireactionsthathavebeennecessaryformanyyears,orinsomecasesdecades,buthavenotbeenpoliticallyfeasiblewithoutastatemandate.TheformationofGroundwaterSustainabilityAgencies(GSAs),theagenciesresponsibleforthedevelopmentandimplementationofGSPs,willitselfbeadifficulttask.ItwillrequirelocalagenciestomakedifficultdecisionsupfrontaboutwhowillgovernastheGSA,andhenceberesponsiblefordeveloping,implementing,andenforcingtheGSP.

1Withexceptiontoadjudicatedgroundwaterbasinsandspecialactdistricts.221ofthestate’shigh-andmedium-prioritybasinsaresubjecttocriticalconditionsofoverdraftandmustbemanagedunderaGSPbyJanuary31,2020.3Lowandverylow-prioritybasinsmustdevelopaGroundwaterSustainabilityAgency(GSA)orreportgroundwaterextractionsannually,butarenotrequiredtodevelopandimplementaGroundwaterSustainabilityPlan(GSP)(Cal.WaterCode§5202.2).

Page 4: Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT · 2 Workshop Objectives Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in partnership

GroundwaterDataunderSGMA:BackgroundReport Jan.28-29,2016

4

TheseentitieswillalsohavetoworkcollaborativelytoensurethatGSPsarecoordinated,whileincorporatingtheuncertaintyofchanginglandusepractices,watersupply,populationgrowth,climatechangeandotherfactorsoverthe50-yearplanningandimplementationhorizondefinedinSGMA.SuccessfulimplementationofSGMAwillrequireadetailedunderstandingofexistinggroundwaterconditionsineachbasin,thedevelopmentofmeasurableobjectivestoaddressundesirableresults,andtheabilitytoevaluateprogresstowardthoseobjectives.Developinggroundwaterdatacollectionandmanagementprotocolsthatsupportdecision-makingarecrucialforeffectiveandsustainablegroundwatermanagement.

2 WorkshopObjectivesStanfordUniversity’sWaterintheWestProgramandtheGouldCenterforConflictResolution,inpartnershipwithCaliforniaStateUniversity’sCenterforCollaborativePolicy,areundertakingadataworkshopserieswithwatermanagers,groundwaterconsultants,waterlawyers,facilitators,stateagencyofficials,academics,NGOsandotherstoseeksolutionstothechallengesthatwateragenciesarelikelytofaceinintegratingdataandwaterplanningtoolsunderSGMA.Thegoalsofthedataworkshopseriesare:

1) Toexchangeinformationandpromoteopendiscussionregardinggroundwaterdataneeds,andthebestavailablescienceandtechnologytomeettheseneeds.TousethisinformationtosupportthedevelopmentofregulationsandbestmanagementpracticesunderSGMAandtosupportlocalagenciesduringthedevelopmentofgroundwatersustainabilityplansrequiredundertheSustainableGroundwaterManagementAct(SGMA).

2) Toidentifythemajordata-relatedissuesorchallengesstateandlocalagenciesarelikelytofaceduringSGMAimplementationandpotentialsolutionstoaddressthesechallenges.

Theworkshopserieswilldiscussthesetopicsduringfourworkshopscovering(1)groundwatermodels(November16,2015),(2)groundwaterdataandgroundwater-surfacewaterinteractions(January28-29,2016),(3)decisionsupporttools(June3,2016)and(4)geophysicalmethods(October,2016).Thisreportisintendedtoinformthesecondworkshopintheseries.ThefirsthalfofthisoneandonehalfdayworkshopwillfocusonanewlegislativerequirementunderSGMA–groundwater-surfacewaterconnectivity.Thelegal,regulatory,andenvironmentalconsiderationsofthesurfacewaterandgroundwaterconnectionwillbeexplored,alongwithapproachesandmethodsformeasuringandmonitoringtheseinteractions.Thesecondhalfoftheworkshopwillexplore1)thekeydataneedsandchallengesthatlocalagenciesarelikelytofaceduringimplementationofthenewgroundwaterlegislation,2)approachestointegratingandcoordinatingdataatavarietyofscales,3)issuesofdatatransparency,and4)potentialsolutionsandnextstepstoaddressthesedata-relatedchallenges.ThisworkshopseriesistakingplacewhiletheDepartmentofWaterResources(DWR)isdraftingregulationsforimplementingandevaluatingGSPsunderSGMA.Whilepartofabroaderresearchprogram,discussionsatthisworkshopseriesmayhelptoinformregulationdevelopment.

Page 5: Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT · 2 Workshop Objectives Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in partnership

GroundwaterDataunderSGMA:BackgroundReport Jan.28-29,2016

5

Toinformthisworkshopseries,agroundwaterdatasurveywasconductedduringthefallof2015.Thesurveytargetedlocalagencystaff4andgroundwaterconsultantswiththegoalofdevelopingamorecomprehensiveunderstandingofthecurrentstateofgroundwaterdatacollection,use,andsharingpracticesacrossthestate,aswellastherolethatgroundwatermodelsandadvancedtechnologiesplayingroundwatermanagementdecisions.KeyfindingsfromthegroundwaterdatasurveyarepresentedinSection4.Agroundwaterdatasurveyreportcanbefoundhere.5

3 DataRequirementsunderSGMAGSAformationiscurrentlyunderwayinmanypartsofthestate.Onceformed,GSAswillneedtodevelopGSPs,whichmustavoidundesirableresults(Box1)andachievesustainabilitygoalswithin20yearsofplanadoption.6ImprovingdatacollectionandunderstandingaboutgroundwaterisanexplicitintentofSGMA(Cal.WaterCode10720.1(f)).

GroundwaterdataandthedevelopmentofrobustgroundwatermonitoringandmanagementprotocolsareakeycomponentinGSPdevelopment(Cal.WaterCode10727.2).ThenewgroundwaterlegislationrequiresGSPstoincludedataonrechargeareas,groundwaterlevels,groundwaterquality,subsidence,andgroundwater-surfacewaterinteraction(Cal.WaterCode10727.2).Agenciesmustalsodevelopmonitoringprotocolsdesignedtogenerateinformationthatpromotesefficientandeffectivegroundwatermanagement(Cal.WaterCode10727.2(f)).Thesemonitoringprotocolsfocusspecificallyondetectingchangesingroundwaterlevels,waterquality,landsurfacesubsidence,andflowandqualityofinterconnectedsurfacewaters.Additionalplanelementsonsalinewater

5Findthecompletegroundwaterdatasurveyreportathttp://waterinthewest.stanford.edu/news-events/news-insights/new-report-assesses-adequacy-data-needed-implement-landmark-ca-groundwater621ofthestate’shighandmediumprioritybasinsaresubjecttocriticalconditionsofoverdraftandmustbemanagedunderaGSPbyJanuary31,2020.AllremaininghighandmediumprioritybasinshaveuntilJanuary31,2022tobemanagedunderaGSP.

Box1.AvoidingUndesirableResultsunderSGMA

SGMArequiresGSAtomanagetheirbasininamannerthatdoesnotcause“undesirableresults”,whicharedefinedinthelegislationas:

…oneormoreofthefollowingeffectscausedbygroundwaterconditionsoccurringthroughoutabasin:

1. Chronicloweringofgroundwaterlevelsindicatingasignificantandunreasonabledepletionofsupplyifcontinuedovertheplanningandimplementationhorizon….

2. Significantandunreasonablereductionofgroundwaterstorage.3. Significantandunreasonableseawaterintrusion.4. Significantandunreasonabledegradedwaterquality,includingthemigrationof

contaminantplumesthatimpairwatersupplies.5. Significantandunreasonablelandsubsidencethatsubstantiallyinterfereswithsurface

landuses.6. Depletionsofinterconnectedsurfacewaterthathavesignificantandunreasonable

adverseimpactsonbeneficialusesofthesurfacewater.

Page 6: Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT · 2 Workshop Objectives Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in partnership

GroundwaterDataunderSGMA:BackgroundReport Jan.28-29,2016

6

intrusion,wellheadprotectionareas,contaminanttransportandremediationefforts,wellconstructionand/ordestructionpolicies,conservationefforts,conjunctiveuseorundergroundstorage,andimpactsongroundwater-dependentecosystemsarerequiredwhereapplicable.Inbasinsdevelopingmorethanonemanagementplan,coordinationisrequiredtoensurethatthesamedataandmethodologiesareusedinalltheplans.Thisincludesdataongroundwaterelevation,groundwaterextraction,surfacewatersupply,totalwateruse,changeingroundwaterstorage,waterbudget,andsustainableyield(Cal.WaterCode10727.6).GiventheexistingfragmentationingroundwatermanagementinCalifornia,thisbasin-scalecoordinationofdataandgroundwaterplanningtoolswillbeamajorundertakingrequiringnewapproaches,toolsandtechnologies.

Box2.Groundwater-SurfaceWaterConnectivityinCaliforniaCaliforniawaterlawviewsandregulatessurfacewaterandgroundwaterasseparateentities,contrarytoscience.Thenewgroundwaterlegislationforthefirsttimerequirestheagenciesmanaginggroundwatertoaddresstheimpactsofgroundwaterpumpingonsurfacewaters.TheCaliforniaDepartmentofWaterResourcesiscurrentlyintheprocessofdraftingregulationsforimplementingandevaluatingGSPsunderSGMA.Becausegroundwaterandsurfacewaterconnectivitywasnotnecessarilyacommonconsiderationinlocalgroundwatermanagement,thereareinadequatedatainmanygroundwaterbasinspertainingtogroundwaterandsurfacewaterinteractions.Inmanycases,thereisnoinformationonwhetherconnectivityevenexists.AccordingtosurveyresultsofCaliforniawaterpractitioners,only38percentofrespondentscollectdataongroundwaterandsurfacewaterconnections,while20percentcollectdataongroundwater-dependentecosystems.Ourworkshopfirstexaminestheenvironmental,legal,andregulatoryconsiderationsofgroundwaterandsurfacewaterconnections,includinghowotherwesternstateshaveaddressedsuchinteractions.Itthenexploresseveralapproaches,tools,andmethodsformeasuringandmonitoringstreamflowdepletions.

Groundwater-SurfaceWaterInteractionsunderSGMAUnderSGMA,agroundwatersustainabilityagencymustconsidertheinterestsofallbeneficialusesandusersofgroundwater,includingenvironmentalusersofgroundwater,andsurfacewaterusers,ifthereisahydrologicconnectionbetweensurfaceandgroundwaterbodies(Cal.WaterCode10723.2(e)and(f)).Atitscore,SGMArequiresGSAstoavoidthesixundesirableresults(Box1).SGMArequirementspertainingtosurfacewaterandgroundwaterconnectivityincludeatleasttwoundesirableresults.Thefirstisthechronicloweringofgroundwaterlevelsthatresultinsignificantandunreasonabledepletionofsupply(Cal.WaterCode10721(w)(1)).Inadditiontoaffectingsurfacewaterrightsholders,areductionofsupplymayimpactgroundwater-dependentecosystemsandotherenvironmentalusers.Thesecondundesirableresultisdepletionsofinterconnectedsurfacewaterthathavesignificantandunreasonableadverseimpactsonbeneficialusesofthesurfacewater(Cal.WaterCode10721(w)(6)).Ofnote,theterm“interconnectedsurfacewater”isnotdefinedinthelegislation;policyfromtheDepartmentofWaterResourcescouldhelpclarifythelegislativeintent.Inadditiontoavoidingundesirableresults,SGMArequiresGSPstoincludeimpactsongroundwater-dependentecosystemswhereappropriate(Cal.WaterCode10727.4(l))andtodevelopmonitoringandmanagementprotocolstodetectchangesinsurfaceflowandsurfacewaterqualitythatdirectlyaffectgroundwaterlevelsorqualityorarecausedbygroundwaterextractioninthebasin(Cal.WaterCode10727.2(d)(2)).

Page 7: Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT · 2 Workshop Objectives Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in partnership

GroundwaterDataunderSGMA:BackgroundReport Jan.28-29,2016

7

4 SummaryofGroundwaterDataSurveyResultsInthesummerof2015,StanfordUniversity’sWaterintheWestProgramandTheGouldCenterforConflictResolutionconductedagroundwaterdatasurvey.Thesurveytargetedlocalagenciesandgroundwaterconsultantswiththegoalofdevelopingamorecomprehensiveunderstandingofthecurrentstateofgroundwaterdatacollection,useandsharingpracticesacrossthestate,aswellastherolethatgroundwatermodelsandadvancedtechnologiesplayingroundwatermanagementdecisionsinCalifornia.Amorecompletesummaryofsurveyresultscanbefoundhere.7Keyfindingsfromthesurveysuggeststhat:1. Groundwaterdataisofteninadequatefordecision-makingpurposes.Despitethe

factthatmorethan80percentofsurveyrespondentscollectgroundwaterlevelsdata,onlyslightlymorethanhalfconsiderthegeographiccoverage(54percent)andmonitoringfrequency(56percent)ofthesedatatobeadequatefordecision-makingpurposes.Similarresultsareobservedwithwaterqualitydata.Inthiscase,76percentofsurveyrespondentscollectedwaterqualitydataintheirjurisdictionalarea,butlessthanhalfofsurveyrespondentsconsideredthegeographic(44percent)andmonitoringfrequency(40percent)ofthesedatatobeadequatefordecision-makingpurposes.

2. Manydatanecessaryforeffectivegroundwatermanagementaremissingorhighlyuncertain.Surveyrespondentsindicatedthatmissingorhighlyuncertaindatasetshindertheirabilitytomanageeffectively.Missingoruncertaindatasetsincludedgroundwaterrechargepotential(38percent),thelocationofgroundwaterrechargeareas(28percent),sustainableyield(36percent),groundwater-dependentecosystems(26percent),groundwaterextractions(24percent)andgroundwaterlevels(22percent).

3. Manylocalagenciesdonothavededicatedgroundwatermonitoringwells.Some12percentofrespondentswithestablishedgroundwatermonitoringnetworksdidnothaveasinglededicatedmonitoringwellintheirnetwork.Productionwellsaccountedfor54percentofthewellsindedicatedgroundwatermonitoringnetworks.

4. Groundwatermanagementagenciesneedmoredatathatcanbereadilysharedatavarietyofscales.Nearly60percentofsurveyrespondentstoanopen-endedsurveyquestionindicatedtheneedforstandardizeddatacollectionmethodsandacommondata-sharingplatform.

5. Localagenciesrelyondatafromotheragencies(local,stateandfederal)tosupplementdatacollectedintheirjurisdictionalarea.Groundwaterlevel,waterquality,landusedataandgeologyarethedatamostcommonlysharedbetweenlocalagencies.Some62percentofsurveyrespondentsreportusinggroundwaterlevelandwaterqualitydatafromotherlocalagencies.Localagenciesalsorelyonstateandfederalagenciesforabreadthofdata,includinggroundwaterlevelandwaterqualitydata,climatedataandgeology.

7Findthecompletegroundwaterdatasurveyreportathttp://waterinthewest.stanford.edu/news-events/news-insights/new-report-assesses-adequacy-data-needed-implement-landmark-ca-groundwater

Page 8: Discussion Paper GROUNDWATER DATA IN THE SGMA CONTEXT · 2 Workshop Objectives Stanford University’s Water in the West Program and the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, in partnership

GroundwaterDataunderSGMA:BackgroundReport Jan.28-29,2016

8

5 ReferencesBlomquist,W.A.(1992).DividingtheWaters:governinggroundwaterinsouthernCalifornia,ICS,Lanham,MD.

[DWR2003]CaliforniaDepartmentofWaterResources.(2003).California’sGroundwater.Bulletin118,Update2003,CaliforniaDepartmentofWaterResources,Sacramento,CA.

[DWR2014]CaliforniaDepartmentofWaterResources.(2014).PublicUpdateforDroughtResponse:GroundwaterBasinswithPotentialWaterShortagesandGapsinGroundwaterMonitoring,April30,2014,CaliforniaDepartmentofWaterResources,Sacramento,CA.

Gerlak,A.K.,andT.Heikkila.(2011).BuildingaTheoryofLearninginCollaboratives:EvidencefromtheEvergladesRestorationProgram.JournalofPublicAdministrationResearchandTheory,21:619-644.doi:10.1093/jopart/muq089

Heikkila,T.(2004).InstitutionalBoundariesandCommon-PoolResourceManagement:ACompartiveAnalysisofWaterManagementProgramsinCalifornia.JournalofPolicyAnalysisandManagement,23(1):97-117.

Hughes,S.,andS.Pincetl.(2014).Evaluatingcollaborativeinstitutionsincontext:thecaseofregionalwatermanagementinCalifornia.EnvironmentPlanningC:GovernmentandPolicy,32:20-38.doi:10.1068/c1210.

Nelson,R.L.(2012).Assessinglocalplanningtocontrolgroundwater-depletion:Californiaasamicrocosmofglobalissues.WaterResourcesResearch,48:W01502.doi:10.1029/2011WR010927.

6 AdditionalReadingonGroundwater-SurfaceWaterInteractionsBarlow,P.M.,andS.A.Leake.(2012).Streamflowdepletionbywells—Understandingandmanagingtheeffectsofgroundwaterpumpingonstreamflow:U.S.GeologicalSurveyCircular1376.(Availableathttp://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1376/)Galloway,D.L.,W.M.Alley,P.M.Barlow,T.E.Reilly,andP.Tucci.(2003).EvolvingIssuesandPracticesinManagingGround-WaterResources:CaseStudiesontheRoleofScience:U.S.GeologicalSurveyCircular1247.(Availableat:http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2003/circ1247/pdf/Circ1247.pdf)Reeves,H.M.,D.A.Hamilton,P.W.Seelbach,andA.J.Asher.(2013).Ground-Water-WithdrawalComponentoftheMichiganWater-WithdrawalScreeningTool:U.S.GeologicalSurveyScientificInvestigationsReport2009-5003.PreparedincooperationwiththeMichiganDepartmentofNaturalResources.(Availableat:http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5003/pdf/sir2009-5003_web.pdf)