disclosure of relapse impact for addicts and partners m. deborah corley, phd sante center for...
TRANSCRIPT
Disclosure of RelapseImpact for
Addicts and Partners
M. Deborah Corley, PhDSante Center for Healing
www.santecenter.com800-258-4250
Jennifer Schneider, MD, PhDTucson, AZ
www.jenniferschneider.com520-990-7886
Objectives• Examine impact of disclosure of relapse on
trust, communication, sexual relations, and relationship satisfaction for partners and addicts
• Discuss how partners viewed self as co-addicts or victims of relational trauma
• Utilize information contained in this research to better prepare couples for possible relapse and building stronger relationships
Disclosure & Relapse●Disclosure is recommended by both
addiction therapists and relationship therapists
●Disclosure for addict and partner is painful●Partners often experience PTSD symptoms
for lengthy periods of time after disclosure, this is increased when someone staggers the disclosure
●Relapse is common in addiction●Partners threaten to leave, but usually don’t●Partners and addicts can be both triggers
for each other and support to each other’s recovery
Disclosure & Relapse●Our original research - Addicts
●Most reported at least one relapse; (1/3 < 2 yr; 2-5 yr; 5+ yrs);
●91% reported high risk acting out (behavior put partner at risk)
●Disclosure represented hope and end to secret life, but also painful emotions and loss
●Best therapists’ advise – Be honest, be general (no gory details) & wait until partner is less angry
●Most helpful support – 12-step meetings, therapy, spirituality, sponsor
Disclosure & Relapse 2●Our original research - Partners
●Disclosure clarified that they were not crazy, gave them hope for the future, helped them focus on self-care
●33% had self doubt and hopelessness, others were angry & in pain
●Over half threatened to leave; less than ¼ left
●Most helpful advice – finally felt heard, not your fault, take care of yourself, addict should be honest with you
●Most helpful support – therapy, self-care, 12-step meetings, friends
Disclosure & Relapse 3●Our original research – Both
●Despite the pain, disclosure was the right thing to do
●Would recommend to other couples
New Research Questions●Did the addict tell before marriage?●Was outcome of original disclosure
positive or negative?●How many relapses?●Was there separation?●How many people stayed together?●To what level has addict been
honest?●Has disclosure/addiction had impact
on relationship satisfaction?●Why do these couples stay together?
Participants Addicts Partners
• 62 self-identified sex addicts (62/189-33%)
• Mean age 47.5 (SD=12)• 89.5% male• 86% heterosexual• 82% in committed
relationship• 68% college grad +• 72% survivor of past
abuse• Over half had co-
occurring DX, Depression
• 92 partners of sex addicts (92/126/73%)
• Mean age 44.4 (SD=12)• 95.6% female• 95.6% heterosexual• 82% in committed
relationship• 67% college grad +• 58% survivor of other
abuse
Initial Disclosure Addicts Partners
• Pre-marriage o 34.4% said nothing o 21.3% disclosed little
• After initial disclosureo 77% said partner asked for
more information (44% all)• 25% reported all• 40% reported small
amount or nothing
• 48% impact negative• 27% mixed (+/-)
o 29% moved out/other room
• 25% impact positive
• Pre-marriageo 44.4% addict said nothingo 24.4% disclosed little
• After initial disclosureo 90% asked addict for more
information (71% all)• 24% reported all• 40% reported small
amount or nothing
• 28% impact negative • 54% mixed (+/-)
o 57% moved out/other room
• 19% impact positive
RelapseAddicts Partners
• Internet big impacto 66% porn/other OSBo 28% arranged for 1:1
• Relapse commono 24% reported oneo 33% reported 2-5o 7% reported 6-10o 32% reported > 10
• 65% suspected relapse• Partners significantly more
likely to discover the relapse than to be told (r =.29, p =.009)
• 36% of partner said their definition of relapse differed from addict
• Internet big impacto 73.8% porn/other OSBo 26.2% arranged for 1:1
• Relapse commono 27% reported oneo 25% reported 2-5o 13% reported 6-10o 34% reported > 10
• 63% partner suspected• 69% addicts never or rarely
disclosed before discovery of the relapse; high relapse = less disclose
• 53% of addicts said their definition of relapse differed from partner
Impact on PartnerAddicts Partners
• Saw partner co-add/depo 40% yeso 36.8% noo 22.8% somewhat
• Survivor of relational traumao 66% yeso 19.4% noo 9.7% somewhat
• Co-addict/co-dependento 41.3% yeso 40.2% noo 18.5% somewhat
• Survivor of relational traumao 76.9% yeso 7.7% noo 15.4% somewhat
Impact Relationship Satisfaction
Addicts Partners• 68% in same relationship
o 46% for 15 + years
• Overall relationshipo 60% excellent or goodo 23% okayo 17% poor/very poor
Addicts rate relationship as better than partners (Ind. Smp t-test) t =3.75, p <.001
• Sexual relationshipo 43% got worseo 26% stayed sameo 26% improved
No significant difference between addict and partner
• 79% in same relationshipo 48% for 15 + years
• Overall relationshipo 33% excellent or goodo 28% okayo 39% poor/very poor
• Sexual relationshipo 54% got worse (23% no
sex)o 26% stayed sameo 20% improved
Impact Relationship Satisfaction
Addicts Partners• 26% damage = never
trust again• 56% talked more about
emotional issues• 57% felt partner helped
recovery (t = 3.42, p =.001)
• 38.5 damage = never trust again (t = 2.47, p = .015)
• 57% talked more about emotional issues
• 24% felt addict helped recovery
Relationship Satisfaction Matters ●For partners higher relationship
satisfaction was positively correlated to●Sexual Satisfaction (r = .49, p < .001) ●Discussing emotional issues (r = .37, p < .005) ●Level of trust (r = .55, p < .001)
●For addicts higher relationship satisfaction was positively correlated to:●Sexual Satisfaction (r = .66, p < .001) ●Discussing emotional issues (r = .57, p < .001) ●Level of trust (r = .50, p < .001) ●Viewing partner as helpful to recovery (r = .35, p
<.008)
# of Relapses & Discovery Matters
● For Partners, differences in what constitutes a relapse ● Relationship satisfaction (r = -.42, p =.001)● Sexual satisfaction (r = -.35, p = .001)● Discussion of emotional issues (r = -.20, p =.059) ● Level of trust (r = -.25, p = .016)
● For partners -- the greater number of relapse, the lower levels of satisfaction ● Relationship satisfaction (r = -.22, p = .05)● Sexual Satisfaction (r = -20, p = .08) ● Discussing emotional issues (r = -.26, p = .020) ● Level of trust (no significant relationship with # of relapses)
● Partner discovered before addict disclosure● Relationship satisfaction (r = -.27, p = .011)● Sexual satisfaction (no significant difference)● Discussion of emotional issues (r = -.20, p = .067)● Level of trust (r = -.23, p =.033)
Partner Reasons to Stay VS Leave● Reasons Got Back Together
Mate got help – 49%Commitment/love – 27%Children or finances – 10%Other – 14%
● Stay Despite RelapseValue of relationship to partner – 26%Children or finances – 23% Mate committed to recovery – 23%Faith/hope – 7%Other – 20%
● Reasons to Leave (some gave more than one answer)Relapse – 48% / Dishonesty – 29% / Stops Recovery Work – 26%Fear of Abuse – 6%Other – 19%
Addict Reasons to Leave● Reasons Partner Agreed to Stay
Mate continues to get help/ go to program/stay sober – 80%None/Don’t know – 14%Partner left – 6%
● Reasons to Leave (some gave more than one answer)Partner cheats on me – 11% Loss of hope, giving up – 11%Partner returns to unhealthy relationship behavior (abusive, shames me, belittles me, codependent, no forgiveness – 34% Nothing Could Make Me Leave – 34%Other – 10%
Conclusions - Lies Don’t Help●From the beginning most addicts lie (even to
us) and it hurts everyone ● Fear or trait or both
●Partners often lie to themselves, others as well● Fear, denial, trait, or all
●Addicts nor partners are very good at utilizing each other to support or improve own recovery program; for those that do, it helps● One third of addicts told partner nothing of their struggles
with their addiction● Almost one third of addicts did not know if their definition of
relapse was same as partners● Only a quarter of addicts had plan of what to do if relapsed,
but only one third of those followed that plan
Conclusions - 2●Disclosure trumps discovery
● Agree on what partner wants to know, process will follow
●Relapse happens, plan for it, follow the plan, re-evaluate, improve● Agree on definitions/levels of relapse/consequences● Framing polygraph as tool for sobriety, not failure of
probation
●Time in program; seeing positive progress helps
● Importance of couple commitment
Recommendations●Addicts need to work on 100% honesty●Addicts and partners need a plan for
dealing with lies and relapses●Disclosure process that honors
honesty but also has process for dealing with shame, anger, and fear.
●Couples will benefit from couple goal setting and working to making relationship stronger; cherish don’t trash
●Celebrate recovery and commitment
Future research●Pair addicts and partners in the data
set if can (more risk of emotional harm)
●Role of shame for both addicts and partners
●Responses of those who have had couples therapy compared to those with addiction therapy or nothing but meetings
●Utilize some attachment and satisfaction with relationship instruments to compare.
Q & A
Thanks●Joshua Hook, PhD & Sara Pollard, MA
from UNT for data analysis●David Delmonico, PhD for help
securing IRB from Duquesne University●Bill Herring and his group for input for
addict survey and thoughts about the results
●All of you who helped get addicts and partners to the survey.