disasters ii - nasa · from bare earth to grass or tree. figure 5: before the fire, vegetation was...

1
Results Methodology Evaluating Fuel Loading at a Landscape Scale in High Elevation Alpine Forests of Lassen Volcanic National Park Abstract The disruption of natural fire regimes caused by fire suppression policies, coupled with drought and changing climate conditions, allow fuel loads to grow in the absence of naturally occurring, low intensity surface fires. Within the mixed conifer forests of the Cascades, catastrophic wildfires challenge forest resilience in Lassen Volcanic National Park (LVNP) and Lassen National Forest (LNF). Land managers within these forested areas can benefit from integrating landscape-scale fuel load density and ecosystem recovery assessments derived from high-resolution, remotely sensed data into their wildfire mitigation and management projects. To provide a landscape-scale assessment, we calculated density estimates of stems per acre and canopy understory fuel loads for the Badger Planning Area with LiDAR, studied ecosystem recovery from the 2012 Reading Fire by calculating pre- and post-fire land cover using high spatial resolution imagery from the USDA National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP), and provided land managers an integrated web tool for spatiotemporal analysis of historical tree mortality and regional fire history using multispectral data from the Landsat series accessed in Google Earth Engine API. Examining fuels with this methodology for historic mortality trends, present conditions, and future planning, will improve wildfire management strategies across administrative boundaries in the Lassen area. Lassen Volcanic National Park Disasters II California – Ames – Fall 2017 Objectives Identify continuous fuel structures using LiDAR in the Badger Planning Area by producing per acre stem density and high-risk canopy data Analyze how land cover has changed within the 2012 Reading Fire perimeter and assess the state of restoration interventions using NAIP imagery and planting data from LNF Expand the capabilities of the Simple Analysis of Vegetative Trends in Earth Engine (SAVeTrEE) tool to map historic tree mortality Study Area Lassen Volcanic National Park Lassen National Forest Waterbodies 2012 Reading Fire Boundary LiDAR, Badger Planning Area Total Study Area Acquire LNF and Badger Planning Area boundaries CA fire history data Fuels treatment data Enable user uploaded area of interest Drape documented fuel treatments and wildfires over mortality classification Google Earth Engine SAVeTrEE 2.0 Canopy Base Height (CBH) for all trees USFS 2015 Badger LiDAR Canopy Height Model (CHM) Canopy Cover (CC) Thiessen polygons to segment individual canopies Acquire Segment Process Badger Planning Area LiDAR Case Study Stems per acre Density Process in ArcMap Jenna Williams Ames Center Lead DEVELOP National Program Dr. Juan Torres-Perez Bay Area Environmental Research Institute John Dilger Ames Assitant Center Lead DEVELOP National Program Joshua Verkerke Previous Contributor, Summer 2017 Steve Buckley National Park Service Elizabeth Hale National Park Service Amber Wittner National Forest Service Janine Book National Forest Service Acknowledgements The mean density of stems in the Badger Planning Area is 157 stems per acre. Canopies with low base heights along the forest-grassland interface are high- priority locations for fuel treatments. Within the Reading Fire perimeter: 9% of the vegetation has returned to near pre-fire state, 3% is in transition to its pre-fire state, and 25% show no signs of post-fire recovery. According to spectral data from NAIP imagery, planting restorations have not significantly accelerated vegetation recovery. SAVeTrEE tool now includes historical fire perimeters. Conclusions Team Members Figure 1. In this planted area of Lassen National Forest, the stem locations of dominant and co-dominant pine trees were determined using a tree segmentation algorithm. This algorithm uses Thiessen Polygons to interpolate the natural boundary between relative maximum heights. Figure 2. In this square acre, the canopy structure heights and boundaries for 203 stems show the density of dominant and co-dominant trees. Canopies with low base heights along the interface of forest and grass patches present a concern for continuous surface fuels that can lead to canopy fires. NAIP 2012-2016 LNF planting points Acquire Process in ArcMap Mosaic quadrangles Calculate NDVI At planting points in LNF At random points in LVNP Supervised classification: bare earth, tree, grass Classify Mean NDVI Reading Fire Recovery Map State of ecosystem recovery post- Reading Fire Compare recovery across boundary Change Analysis Change Analysis No Change 58% No Recovery 25% Full Recovery 9% New State 5% Transition 3% 27,939 Acres Burned from the Reading Fire Anna McGarrigle Team Lead Andrea Ferrer Heather Myers Peter Norton Project Partners National Park Service, Lassen Volcanic National Park USDA, US Forest Service Lassen National Forest Earth Observations Landsat 8 OLI Landsat 5 TM LiDAR and USDA NAIP Landsat 7 ETM+ 203 Stems Acre Stem # Stems 225 200 175 150 125 100 Density of Stems/Acre for 200 Acres Canopy Structure Height Canopy Base Height Height (m) 4+ 2-4 0-2 Height (m) 26-30 21-25 16-20 11-15 6-10 1-5 Canopy Figure 4. 2,460 acres (9%) grew from bare earth to grass or tree. Figure 5: Before the fire, vegetation was evenly distributed within the healthy NDVI range from 0.2 to 0.8. However, the post-fire health varies due to different management practices at the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service. In 2016, less than 10% of vegetation was healthy, whereas 75% and 50% were healthy in the Forest and Park. Four years after the fire, the distribution of vegetation health increased by approximately 0.2 towards the healthy range. Land Cover Classification 2 years post - fire 4 years post - fire Bare Earth Grass Tree Figure 3. In 2014, the Reading Fire area was 63% bare earth and 37% vegetation. In 2016, that has changed to 45% bare earth and 55% vegetation. Figure 6. Time series map of vegetation health trend calculated with a linear regression over a user-specified spectral index, interval, area. Inner map is a bivariate plot of moisture and greenness for one year. Historic fire perimeters are overlaid over entire area. β 1 ≈0 + β 1 ̶ β 1 Max health Peak moisture Peak green 0 HEALTHY VEGETATION RANGE LASSEN NATIONAL FOREST, Planting Activity LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL PARK, Samples 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 FREQUENCY 2012 2014 2016 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 FREQUENCY NDVI Distribution of vegetation health within the Reading Fire

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Disasters II - NASA · from bare earth to grass or tree. Figure 5: Before the fire, vegetation was evenly distributed within the healthy NDVI range from 0.2 to 0.8. However, the post-fire

Results

Methodology

Evaluating Fuel Loading at a Landscape Scale in High Elevation Alpine Forests of

Lassen Volcanic National Park

AbstractThe disruption of natural fire regimes caused by fire suppressionpolicies, coupled with drought and changing climate conditions,allow fuel loads to grow in the absence of naturally occurring, lowintensity surface fires. Within the mixed conifer forests of theCascades, catastrophic wildfires challenge forest resilience inLassen Volcanic National Park (LVNP) and Lassen NationalForest (LNF). Land managers within these forested areas canbenefit from integrating landscape-scale fuel load density andecosystem recovery assessments derived from high-resolution,remotely sensed data into their wildfire mitigation andmanagement projects. To provide a landscape-scale assessment, wecalculated density estimates of stems per acre and canopyunderstory fuel loads for the Badger Planning Area with LiDAR,studied ecosystem recovery from the 2012 Reading Fire bycalculating pre- and post-fire land cover using high spatialresolution imagery from the USDA National Agriculture ImageryProgram (NAIP), and provided land managers an integrated webtool for spatiotemporal analysis of historical tree mortality andregional fire history using multispectral data from the Landsatseries accessed in Google Earth Engine API. Examining fuelswith this methodology for historic mortality trends, presentconditions, and future planning, will improve wildfire managementstrategies across administrative boundaries in the Lassen area.

Lass

en

Vo

lca

nic

Na

tio

na

l P

ark

Dis

ast

ers

II

California – Ames – Fall 2017

Objectives Identify continuous fuel structures using LiDAR in the

Badger Planning Area by producing per acre stem densityand high-risk canopy data

Analyze how land cover has changed within the 2012Reading Fire perimeter and assess the state of restorationinterventions using NAIP imagery and planting data fromLNF

Expand the capabilities of the Simple Analysis of VegetativeTrends in Earth Engine (SAVeTrEE) tool to map historictree mortality

Study Area

Lassen Volcanic National Park

Lassen National Forest

Waterbodies

2012 Reading Fire Boundary

LiDAR, Badger Planning Area

Total Study Area

Acquire

LNF and Badger

Planning Area

boundaries

CA fire history data

Fuels treatment

data

Enable user uploaded

area of interest

Drape documented

fuel treatments and

wildfires over mortality

classification

Google Earth Engine

SAVeTrEE 2.0

Canopy Base

Height (CBH) for

all trees

USFS 2015 Badger

LiDAR

Canopy Height

Model (CHM)

Canopy Cover (CC)

Thiessen polygons

to segment

individual canopies

Acquire Segment

Process

Badger Planning Area LiDAR Case Study

Stems per acre

Density

Process in ArcMap

Jenna WilliamsAmes Center LeadDEVELOP National Program

Dr. Juan Torres-PerezBay Area Environmental Research Institute

John DilgerAmes Assitant Center LeadDEVELOP National Program

Joshua VerkerkePrevious Contributor, Summer 2017

Steve BuckleyNational Park Service

Elizabeth HaleNational Park Service

Amber WittnerNational Forest Service

Janine BookNational Forest Service

Acknowledgements

The mean density of stems in the Badger Planning Area is 157 stems per acre.

Canopies with low base heights along the forest-grassland interface are high-priority locations for fuel treatments.

Within the Reading Fire perimeter: 9% of the vegetation has returned to near pre-fire state, 3% is in transition to its

pre-fire state, and 25% show no signs of post-fire recovery.

According to spectral data from NAIP imagery, planting restorations have not significantly accelerated vegetation recovery.

SAVeTrEE tool now includes historical fire perimeters.

ConclusionsTeam Members

Figure 1. In this planted area of Lassen National Forest, the stem locations of dominant and

co-dominant pine trees were determined using a tree segmentation algorithm. This algorithm

uses Thiessen Polygons to interpolate the natural boundary between relative maximum heights.

Figure 2. In this square acre, the canopy structure heights and boundaries for 203 stems show the

density of dominant and co-dominant trees. Canopies with low base heights along the interface of

forest and grass patches present a concern for continuous surface fuels that can lead to canopy fires.

NAIP 2012-2016

LNF planting

points

Acquire

Process in ArcMap

Mosaic quadrangles

Calculate NDVI

At planting points

in LNF

At random points

in LVNP

Supervised

classification: bare

earth, tree, grass

Classify

Mean NDVI

Reading Fire Recovery Map

State of ecosystem

recovery post-

Reading Fire

Compare recovery

across boundary

Change Analysis

Change Analysis

No Change

58%

No Recovery25%

Full Recovery

9%

New State5%

Transition3%

27,939Acres Burned

from the

Reading Fire

Anna McGarrigle

Team Lead

Andrea Ferrer Heather Myers Peter Norton

Project PartnersNational Park Service,Lassen Volcanic National Park

USDA, US Forest ServiceLassen National Forest

Earth ObservationsLandsat 8 OLILandsat 5 TM LiDAR and

USDA NAIP

Landsat 7 ETM+

203

Stems

Acre Stem

# Stems

225

200

175

150

125

100

Density of Stems/Acre for 200 Acres

Canopy Structure Height Canopy Base Height

Height (m)

4+

2-4

0-2

Height (m)

26-30

21-25

16-20

11-15

6-10

1-5

Canopy

Figure 4. 2,460 acres (9%) grew

from bare earth to grass or tree.

Figure 5: Before the fire,

vegetation was evenly

distributed within the

healthy NDVI range from

0.2 to 0.8. However, the

post-fire health varies due

to different management

practices at the U.S. Forest

Service and National Park

Service. In 2016, less than

10% of vegetation was

healthy, whereas 75% and

50% were healthy in the

Forest and Park. Four years

after the fire, the

distribution of vegetation

health increased by

approximately 0.2 towards

the healthy range.

Land Cover Classification

2 years post-fire 4 years post-fire Bare Earth

Grass

Tree

Figure 3. In

2014, the

Reading Fire

area was 63%

bare earth and

37% vegetation.

In 2016, that has

changed to 45%

bare earth and

55% vegetation.

Figure 6. Time series map of vegetation health trend calculated

with a linear regression over a user-specified spectral index, interval,

area. Inner map is a bivariate plot of moisture and greenness for

one year. Historic fire perimeters are overlaid over entire area.

β1≈0

+ β1

β1

Max health

Peak moisture

Peak green

0

HEALTHY

VEGETATION

RANGE

LASSEN

NATIONAL

FOREST,

Planting Activity

LASSEN

VOLCANIC

NATIONAL

PARK,

Samples

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

FR

EQ

UEN

CY 2012

2014

2016

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

FR

EQ

UEN

CY

NDVI

Distribution of vegetation health within the Reading Fire