disaster resilience - infrastructure to combat climate change creating disaster-resilient...
TRANSCRIPT
Disaster Resilience - Infrastructure to Combat Climate ChangeCreating Disaster-Resilient Communities
ICC Hong Kong, May 30th, 2007
What’s an Arup?
Drivers of Change
•Climate
•Energy
•Water
•Waste
•Demographics
•Urbanization
Definition
• Disaster Aversion: mitigating disasters we are causing or causing to accelerate
• Disaster-Resistance: designing systems to withstand events (typically through single-system approaches)
• Disaster-Resilience: designing flexible, adaptive and redundant systems, typically through an integrated approach
At what scale should we be addressing these issues?
Increasing dependence on large-scale grids/distribution systems = increased vulnerability to climate
change/disasters
(mega-farms, national energy grids, telecoms, etc)
Vulnerable Communities (metropolitan areas)
• Growing urban populations stressing existing resources/systems
• Poorly articulated growth strategies promote consumption of natural buffers/critical areas
• Distributed governance responsibility = difficult coordination / slow reaction
• Corporate resilience heavily linked to resilience of public infrastructure = threat to competitiveness in global economy
Characteristics of Disaster-Resilience Communities
• Link prevention strategies with buildings/infrastructure (critical facilities)
• Buildings fail gently at specific points
• Energy, water, communications strategies can function detached from local / regional / national grids
• Industrial / food strategies, warehousing
• Performance-based regulatory schemes encourage innovation
Examples
• Non-bonded braces (seismic zones)
• Energy independence – wind, sun, biofuels
• Fuel cell powered buses (Dongtan) and ferries (Treasure Island) double as back up power for critical facilities
• Integrated design approach to high density compact development = energy efficiency, more open space, reduced infrastructure costs
• Recycling 100% water to live within community’s water budget
Conclusion
• A sustainable (integrated design) approach is the most rational pathway to long term value creation and competitive advantage
• The most robust of all risk management strategies: depth, breadth, at intersections and over time.
• Without an economic lever customary belief is difficult to dislodge
• To optimize conditions for human development over time a city must be environmentally, socially, economically and culturally sustainable
Thank You