disappointment to ridley scott’s the kingdom of …eprints.ums.ac.id/69278/8/halaman...
TRANSCRIPT
i
DISAPPOINTMENT TO RIDLEY SCOTT’S THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
FILM (2005) : READER RESPONSE ANALYSIS
THESIS
Submitted to the Department of Language Studies Graduate School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
as a Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for getting Master Degree of Education
Written by:
Widayah
(S200160082)
POST GRADUTE PROGRAM
MAGISTER OF LANGUAGE STUDIES
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2018
ii
NOTE OF ADVISOR I
Dr. M Thoyibi, M.S
Lecturer of Magister of Language Study Post Graduate Program Muhammadiyah
University of Surakarta
Official Note on Widayah’s Thesis
Dear,
The Director of Graduate Program of Magister of Language Study of Graduate Program
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
AssalamualaikumWr.Wb.
Having read, examined and necessarily revised toward the thesis of
Name : Widayah
Nim : S200160082
Program : Magister of Language Study
Focus on : Literature
Titled : Disappointment To Ridley Scott’s The Kingdom Of Heaven Film
(2005) : Reader Response Analysis
I state that this thesis is approved to be examined by the board of examiners in the Magister Of Language Study of Muhammadiyah of Surakarta.
Wassalamualaikum, Wr, Wb.
Surakarta, 05 November 2018
Dr. M. Thoyibi, M.S.
iii
NOTE OF ADVISOR II
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M. Ed
Lecturer of Magister of Language Study Post Graduate Program Muhammadiyah
University of Surakarta
Official Note on Widayah’s Thesis
Dear,
The Director of Graduate Program of Magister of Language Study of Graduate Program
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
AssalamualaikumWr.Wb.
Having read, examined and necessarily revised toward the thesis of
Name : Widayah
Nim : S200160082
Program : Magister of Language Study
Focus on : Literature
Titled : Disappointment To Ridley Scott’s The Kingdom Of Heaven Film
(2005) : Reader Response Analysis
I state that this thesis is approved to be examined by the board of examiners in the Magister Of Language Study of Muhammadiyah of Surakarta.
Wassalamualaikum, Wr, Wb.
Surakarta, 05 November 2018
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M. Ed
iv
APPROVAL
DISAPPOINTMENT TO RIDLEY SCOTT’S THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
FILM (2005) : READER RESPONSE ANALYSIS
THESIS
BY
WIDAYAH
S200160082
Approved by the Advisor team
Advisor I Advisor II
Dr. M. Thoyibi, M,S Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M. Ed
NIK 410 NIK
v
APPROVAL OF THESIS FOR SUBMISSION
DISAPPOINTMENT TO RIDLEY SCOTT’S THE
KINGDOM OF HEAVEN FILM (2005) : READER
RESPONSE ANALYSIS
Submitted by
WIDAYAH
Has been examined for all reviions and corrections recommended
by the board examiners on November.... 2018 and is certifid to be accepted for submission
THE EXAMINER BOARD
Examiner I
Dr. M. Thoyibi, M.S
Examiner II
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M. Ed
Examiner III
Dr. Abdillah Nugroho, M.Hum
Surakarta, 05 November 2018
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Graduate School
Director;
Prof. Dr. Khudzaifah Dimyati
vi
Motto
A person who never make a mistake never tried anything new
(Albert Einstein)
vii
DEDICATION
This thesis whole dedicated to:
The Greatest ALLAH SWT
My Beloved Husband “ Edi S.”
My Beloved Parents “ Ngaisatin Istifadah” and “Bonaji”
My Beloved Daughter and Son “ NaelaAyu W.H.” and “A. FaishalLintang
W.A.”
viii
Abstrak Widayah. S.200160082 Disappointment To Ridley Scott’s The Kingdom of Heaven Film (2005)
:Reader Response Analysis. Thesis the Department Language Studies Graduate School,
Universitas Muhammadiyah Suarakarta, advisor (1) Dr. M. Thoyibi, M.S, (2) Dr. Phil. Dewi
Candraningrum, M. Ed.
Penelitian ini mempunyai 3 objek : (1) menggambarka profil dari review film The Kingdo m of
Heaven (2005) (2) mendiskrisikan isu kekecewaan terhadap film The Kingdom of Heaven
(2005) (3) menganalisa alasan kekecewaan. Pendekatan kualitatif di gunakan karna peneliti ingin
fokus mendeskripsikan bagaimana review penonton film the Kingdom of Heaven melalui teori
tanggapan pembaca. Data ini menggunakan dua sumber yaitu data primer dan data sekunder.
Data primer adalah data yang diambil dari situs Internet Movie Database (IMDb) dan data
sekunder diambil dari sumber artikel lain seperti, jurnal, buku, dan situs yang berhubungan
dengan teori tanggapan pembaca. Hingga Mei 2005 sampai 30 September 2014 sebanyak 923
review terdiiri dari 657 data yang dianalisisdan 266 spoiler. Isu yang dominan dari tanggapan
review adalah mengaplikasikan teori tanggapan pembaca dari Beachyang berhubungan dengan
respon budaya. Sebanyak 533 review menyatakan kekecewaan terhadap film ini. Berdasarkan
temuan menyimpulkan ada 21 isu kekecewaan. Berdasarkan analisis tanggapan pembaca,
penelitian ini juga berhubungan dengan kontek budaya. Pro dan kontra yang tergambarkan
dipengaruhi oleh latar belakang negara dan budaya mereka. Review yang merasa diuntungkan
akan menganggap film ini bagus sedangkan review yang merasa dirugikan akan menganggap
film ini buruk.
Kata Kunci : tanggapan pembaca, the Kingdom of Heaven, kekecewaan
Abstract
This research has three objectives: (1)To portray the profile of the reviewers the Kingdom of
Heaven Film (2005) (2) To describe the issues ofdisappointment of The Kingdom of Heaven
Film (2005) (3) To reveal the reason of disappointment. Qualitative approach is employed
because the researcher wants to focus on describing how the audience reviews of the Kingdom
of Heaven Film through Reader-Response theory .The data using two data source. They are
primary and secondary data. The primary data were taken from the Internet Movie Database
(IMDb) and the secondary data were taken from such as other source article,book, journal, also
website related to reader response theory. Till may 2005 Up to September 30 2014 there were
923 reviewers consisting of 657 data analyzed and 266 spoilers. The dominant issue which is
response by the reviewers is applying the reader response theory by beach dealing with the
cultural response. The total 533 reviewers stated that they disappointed to the film. The finding
concluded that they were 21 issues disappointment.Based on the reader response analysis, this
researvh also connected with the culture context. Pro Contra portrayed the ch aracter was
influenced by their background nationality and culture. The reviewer who feel advantages will
assume the Kingdom of Heaven film is Good while the reviewer who feel disadvantages will assume this film is worst.
Keyword:Reader Response, Kingdom of Heaven, Disappointment
ix
PRONOUNCEMENT
Iam the writer of this thesis
Name : Widayah
NIM : S200160082
Program : Magister of Language Study
Focus on : Literature
Title : “Disappointment to Ridley Scott’s the Kingdom of Heaven Film
(2005) : Reader Response Analysis”
Certify that the thesis is definitely my own work. Iam completely responsible of it’s
content. I absolutely states that this thesis is not plagiarism or made by someone
else. The other works related to the thesis have been written in the form of
quotation. The sources of the thesis have been listed in the Bibliography. If next the
thesis can be proved as a plagiarism, the certificate and academic can be cancelled
to be given.
Surakarta, 05 November 2018
Widayah
x
AKNOWLEDGMENT
In the name of Allah, the most merciful for blessing the writer to accomplish this
thesis under the title” “Disappointment To Ridley Scott’s The Kingdom Of Heaven
Film (2005) : Reader Response Analysis”. This thesis is one of requirement for getting
the post graduate of language department at Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Secondly, peace and salution always be given to our prophet Muhammad SAW
who has guided us from the darkness to the lightness.
However, this success would not be achieved without those support, guidance,
advice, help and encouragement from individual and situation, and I somehow realize
that an appropiate moment for me to deepest gratitude for:
1. Prof. Dr. Khudzaifah Dimyati, S.H., M.Hum, the Director of Muhammadiyah
University Surakarta.
2. Prof. Dr. Markhamah, M.Hum, The Head of Language Study Department
3. Dr. M. Thoyibi, M.S, and Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M. Ed and Dr.
Abdillah Nugroho, M.Hum as advisors of the thesis who give guided and advice
during the arrangement of the research paper from the beginning until the end.
4. All of the lectures in English department who had given the knowledge
patiently.
5. All of my friends in the post graduate of language study (chika, adit, dina, ichal,
brian, alvy, andin and ayuk) I love you all
Finally, this graduating paper is expected to be able to provide the useful
knowledge and information to the readers.
Surakarta, 05 November 2018
Writer
xi
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE .................................................................................................................... i
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL FORM.............................................................. ii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL FORM............................................................. iii
APPROVAL ........................................................................................................ iv
APPROVAL OF THESIS SUBMISSION ......................................................... v
MOTTO .............................................................................................................. vii
DEDICATION ................................................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................... viii
PRONOUNCEMENT ....................................................................................... ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................. x
TABLE OF CONTENT ..................................................................................... xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 1
A. Background of the Study. .......................................................................... 1
B. Problem Statement ..................................................................................... 3
C. Objective of the Study ............................................................................... 2
D. Benefits of the Study ................................................................................. 3
E. Paper organization .....................................................................................3
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW AND UNDERLYING THEORY .. 4
A. Underlying theory ...................................................................................... 4
1. Reader response theory .......................................................................4
a. The notion of reader response........................................................ 4
b. The major of reader response ........................................................ 6
c. The type of reader response ........................................................ ...7
2. Structural Element of Film...................................................................8
B. Previous study ........................................................................................... 8
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD.......................................................... 13
A. Type of Research ..................................................................................... 13
B. Object of the Research ............................................................................. 13
C. Data Source.............................................................................................. 14
xii
D. Technique of Collecting the Data ............................................................ 14
E. Technique of Analyzing Data .................................................................. 15
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION........................ 16
A. Research Finding ..................................................................................... 16
1. Review Profile ................................................................................... 16
a. Review by Country ...................................................................... 16
b. Review by Year ........................................................................... 18
c. Review by Gender ....................................................................... 19
2. Issues of Disappointment................................................................... 20
B. Discussion ................................................................................................ 46
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION..................................... 50
A. Conclusion ............................................................................................... 50
B. Suggestion................................................................................................ 51
BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................. 52
APPENDIX......................................................................................................... 52
xiii