disadvantaged young job seekers looking for work: findings from three uk local labour markets
DESCRIPTION
Disadvantaged young job seekers looking for work: findings from three UK local labour markets. Paper presented to LLAKES Conference, University of London, 18-19 October 2012 Rebecca Tunstall, CHP, University of York: Anne Green, IER, University of Warwick; Ruth Lupton, CASE, LSE; - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Disadvantaged young job seekers looking for work: findings from three UK local labour markets
Paper presented to LLAKES Conference, University of London, 18-19 October 2012
Rebecca Tunstall, CHP, University of York: Anne Green, IER, University of Warwick; Ruth Lupton, CASE, LSE; Simon Watmough, European University Institute, Florence; Katie Bates, CASE, LSE.
Funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation
1
The Study
Designed to test for ‘postcode discrimination’ in employment 3 urban labour markets in England and Wales 3 neighbourhoods in each, two ‘stigmatised’, one ‘bland’ Fictional CVs for ‘promising’ young people purporting to live in the
neighbourhoods 2001 applications for 667 real vacancies requiring limited education
and skills (Sales assistants, security guards, cleaners, office admin, accounts clerks, kitchen hands and chefs)
Plus: Street interviews about neighbourhood reputations Analysis of vacancies and competition data Interviews with 14 relevant employers, 11 intermediaries, 57 young job seekers Street survey of job ads – the “on your bike” method
2
3
The Vacancies
Advertised on www.direct.gov.uk, gumtree.co.uk and number of other employers and aggregator sites, Aug 2010-June 2011;
Job site appeared to be within 15 miles of the centre of the 3 labour markets;
Which did not require degrees, vocational qualifications or substantial experience
Decision-maker appeared to be based in the local labour market; Applications could be made via email, upload to website or post; Did not appear to be offers of self employment;
Covered the 1st stage of candidate selection up to interview or similar stage.
4
Postcode discrimination?% positive responses, all 2001 applications 17% received a positive response
13% received a negative response69% received no response
5
Postcode discrimination?% positive responses, only the cases where employers expressed a preference
6
Postcode Discrimination?
Not: for these kinds of jobs with this mode of application for well qualified and experienced candidates at the first stage of application
Evidence that jobseekers should apply without fear of postcode discrimination
Postcode discrimination’ in employment might exist outside scope of experiment: less-well-qualified candidates, other jobs, face-to-face and phone applications; at interview stage of selection; or once employment has started
What else did we learn from spending a year applying for low skilled jobs?
7
The nature of work8
• Seventy-eight per cent of the jobs with wage data available paid under £7 per hour and so under the ‘living wage’. Fifty-four per cent paid at the minimum wage level
• 76% were not full-time, office hours
The changing nature of job search9
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0-3 days 4-7 days 8-14 days 15-21 days 22 days plus
Pe
rce
nta
ge
re
ceiv
ing
1st
-sta
ge
po
sitiv
e r
esp
on
se
Chances of a positive response by time elapsed since advert
• Increasingly web-based, agencies, job trials• Not waiting for a ‘closure date’
Discouraged Workers
“You send out all these applications and you never hear anything back, so you start thinking there’s no point sending any more off” (24 year old man, weak labour market)
“Once you’ve been knocked back a few times it hurts your confidence as well so I think you end up applying less and less and less, until you’re not applying at all. It hurts your confidence if you hear nowt” (25 year old man, weak labour market)
“I took my CV into [name of shop], they left it on the counter; the other worker who wasn’t a manager threw it in the bin, because people are trying to protect their own jobs, it’s dog-eat-dog at the moment.” (22 year old man, medium labour market)
10
The importance of place (1)
11
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Strong Medium Weak
Chances of a positive response by labour market characteristics
Also substantial variation by type of job
The importance of place (2)
12
One of the government’s strategies for getting more people back to work is to get them to look further afield. In 2011, Job Seeker’s Agreements extended potential travel requirements from 60 to 90 minutes from job seekers’ homes (Freud, 2011)
But, most people don’t travel this far to work:In 2009, 79% of all workers travelled 30 minutes or less to work (outside London) (DFT 2011), and in the neighbourhoods we looked at 78% of young people travelled 10km or less
There are good reasons – cost, practicality, domestic responsibilities And employers prefer local people
“[Distance] matters a lot. Someone close by is better” (employer, strong labour market)
“[the main considerations are] previous employment history, qualifications, and travel-to-work” (employer, strong labour market)
“We know from experience that it doesn’t work if people are too far away … so we try and place them within 5 miles” (intermediary, weak labour market)
See also: Green et al. (1991); Zenou (2002), Lupton (2003) Nunn et al. (2010).
SO travelling further won’t necessarily help
13
The number of jobs available is a lot smaller when travel is taken into account
14
"
Legend
" Location of Job Seeker
30 minute public transport zone
10km Zone
Jobs
jobs
1
10
50
100
Most of the jobs in the TTWAs were within 10km of our jobseekers. But only between a third and a half within 30 mins public transport
Conclusions
Real labour demand problems in particular local labour markets‘Dog eat dog’ for low paid, short hours, flexible workNo response is normal practice – discouraged workersLong term consequences for ‘the corrosion of character’ (Sennett)?What do we do about this? – apprenticeships?, Living Wages? Sharing the work around? Training/work experience v. endless job search?Location matters, and transport. Whose responsibility is this, who should bear the cost?In the shorter term:
Job seekers need to understand the labour markets they are operating in: applications need to be speedy, targeted and intensive
Better tailored local intelligence and advice would really help If we’re serious about getting the most disadvantaged into work we need
excellent public transport (or cars), and free readily available internet access for all
15
16
For more info:
‘Disadvantaged Young People Looking for Work: A Job in Itself?’
Published by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Oct 2012
www.jrf.org.uk
For any other info, please contact:
Centre for Housing Policy, University of York