direct radioimmunoassay of specific urinary estrogen glucosiduronates in normal men and nonpregnant...
TRANSCRIPT
2246 407
DIRECT RADIOIMMUNOASSAY OF SPECIFIC URINARY ESTROGEN GLUCOSIDURONATES IN NORMAL MEN AND NONPREGNANT WOMEN*
K. Wrightl, D.C. Collins2, P.I. Musey and J.R.K. Preedy
Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Received: 11-4-77
ABSTRACT
Direct radioimmunoassays are described for the measurement of each of three specific estrogen glucosiduronates: estrone gluco- siduronate, 17B-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate and estriol-16a-gluco- siduronate in urine. Each assay utilizes a specific antiserum prepared by complexing the carboxylic acid group of the appropriate glucosiduronate to the e-amino group of lysine in bovine serum albumin or bovine thyroglobulin. The antisera showed little or no cross reactivity toward other estrogens that might be present in significant amounts in urine. These antisera were used for the direct assay of the conjugates in urine from normal men and nonpreg- nant women without prior extraction or chromatography. The values were similar to those obtained after extraction, chromatographic purification on DEAE-Sephadex and subsequent immunoassay. The fol- lowing mean values + SE (ug/g creatinine) were obtained: estrone glucosiduronate, male 10.1 + 0.6, follicular phase female 17.3 f 1.6, luteal phase female 31.8 + 2.5; 17B-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate, male 1.7 f 0.3, follicular phase female 2.4 + 0.1, luteal phase female 4.2 t 0.4; estriol-16cr-glucosiduronate, male 1.8 + 0.2, follicular phase female 4.7 + 0.9, luteal phase female 10.0 f 1.6.
INTRODUCTION
Urinary estrogen conjugates classically have been quantitated by
chemical measurement of the unconjugated estrogen after hydrolysis
(3,4). There are several disadvantages to this procedure. Acid
hydrolysis is nonspecific and may lead to destruction of the molecule
(4), while enzyme hydrolysis, although more specific, is subject to
inhibition by endogenous urinary substances (3). Chromatographic
methods to separate hydrolyzed or unhydrolyzed estrogens are time
*A preliminary presentation of parts ofthesedata was made at the 61st Annual Meeting of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, April, 1977.
Volwne 31, Nwnber 3 S WBBOXDI March, 2978
408 S TmEOXDI
consuming. Fluorimetric, gas-liquid chromatographic and calorimetric
methods of quantitating hydrolyzed estrogens are relatively insensi-
tive. Finally, any form of hydrolysis may destroy the identity ofthe
starting compounds and therefore does not distinguish between a
single estrogen conjugated at different positions.
Recently, chromatographic methods have been reported which
isolate individual estrogen conjugates on Sephadex (5,6) or as the
trimethylammonium salt derivatives on LH-20 (7,8). The purified
estrogen conjugatewasthen hydrolyzed and the free estrogen measured
by radioimmunoassay (7,8
cific, these methods are
a limited number of samp
Development of spec
. Although reasonably sensitive and spe-
time consuming and can only be applied to
es.
fit antisera to various steroid conjugates
(9) and the development of a radioimmunoassay specific for testos-
terone-17-glucosiduronate (10,ll) indicated the feasibility of
developing a radioimmunoassay specific for individual estrogen
glucosiduronates. In this communication we describe the production
of antisera against steroid-protein conjugates of estrone gluco-
siduronate, 176-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate and estriol-16a-gluco-
siduronate. These antisera were used for the development of specific
radioimmunoassay procedures for these estrogen glucosiduronates
without extraction, chromatographic purification or hydrolysis.
Using these techniques, we report values for these three specific
estrogen conjugates in the urine of normal men and nonpregnant women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Nonradioactive steroids and steroid conjugates were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO., or Steraloids, Wilton, N.H., and purified by recrystallization. Purity was confirmed by thin-
S TmEOXDI 409
layer chromatogra Ci/mM), [2,4,6,7- Hl'estriol !
h Radioisotopes [2 4,6 7-3H] estrone (SA=84 (SA=84 Ci/mi) a;d [6,7-3H]-17B-estradiol-
17-glucosiduronate (SA=59 Ci/mM) were obtained from New England Nuclear Co., Boston, Ma.
Tritiated estrone glucosiduronate and estriol-16a-glucosiduronate of high specific activity were biosynthesized by incubation of the appropriate [3H] estrogen precursor with uridine -5'-diphosphoglucu- ronic acid. A microsomal preparation from rhesus monkey liver was used as an enzyme source (5). The [3H] conjugates were purified by chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex as previously described (5).
Unlabelled steroid standards were prepared and diluted in distilled undenatured ethanol. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (O.lM aqueous sodium phosphate, pH 6.8, containing (W/V) 0.9% NaCl, 0.1% ethylmercurithiosalicylate and 0.1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, RIA grade)) was used as a diluent for the antisera and urine samples. The working solutions of [3H] estrogen conjugates were prepared fresh daily in PBS because of the increased rate of breakdown with prolonged storaae in PBS.
Radioactivity was measured using Packard liquid scintillation spectrometers, models 3320 and 3255, and ScintiverseTM (Emory Formu universal scintillation cocktail.
Antisera: Estrone glucosiduronate was coupled to bovine thyroglobu lin using the mixed anhydride procedure essentially as described by Erlanger ti ti (12). Antisera to estrone glucosiduronate were
la)
raised in adult male New Zealand white rabbits as previously described (13). The production of antisera to estriol-16a-glucosiduronate has already been reported (14,15). The antiserum to 17B-estradiol-17- glucosiduronate, a gift of Dr. A.E. Kellie, was prepared by a similar procedure (9).
The cross reactivities of other steroids and steroid conjugates for the antisera were determined as previously described and expressed as the percent equivalent of the appropriate standard (13).
Sample Collection and Preparation: Twenty-four-hour urine col- lections were made by normal men and women of reproductive age. Samples were collected without preservative and stored at 4"untilthe collection was complete. Aliquots were then stored at -20" until analyzed. No aliquot was used after having been thawed and refrozen three times.
Urine dilutions of 1:50, l:lOO, 1:500 and 1:lOOO were prepared in PBS and analyzed within 48 hr. Aliquots of 500 ul of at least 2 dilutions were assayed in triplicate.
Three different amounts of each estrogen glucosiduronate were added to a male urine sample. These samples were prepared and assayed as above.
Creatinines were measured on a Guilford automatic spectropho- tometer using a modified Jaffe reaction.
Radioinunoassay Procedures: Samples or standards were added to assay tubes in 500 ul PBS. The appropriate antiserum and tracer were added in a volume of 100 ~1 each. After thorough mixing, samples were incubated 60 min or overnight at 4". Bound and free
418 S -EmEOICDI
conjugates were separated in a 15 min incubation at 0" with 1 ml dextran coated charcoal (.5% Norit, .l% dextran in PBS), After centrifugation, the supernatant was decanted and counted after an equilibration period of 2 hr.
DEAE Chromatography: A 15 ml sample of urine containing 35,000 dpm of each of the estrogen glucosiduronates was extracted with 30 ml 95% ethanol by vigorous mixing and standing overnight at -20" (5). The sample was centrifuged and the supernatant removed and taken to dryness in a flash evaporator. cm DEAE-Sephadex column (5).
The residue was applied to a 1 x 60 The column was washed with 500 ml
deionized distilled water, and the estrogen glucosiduronates were eluted with a linear gradient of O-O-0.4M NaCl. An aliquot of each fraction was counted and each radioactive peak was pooled and assessed for recovery.
Each purified estrogen glucosiduronate was quantitated by the direct radioimmunoassay of the intact conjugate as described above after serial dilutions of l:lO, 1:20, 1:50 and 1:lOO in PBS. The values were correlated with values obtained by direct analysis of the same sample.
RESULTS
Antisera: Antisera to estrone glucosiduronate with useful titers
were obtained within 4 months of beginning injection. The antisera
to be studied further were identified by testing each antiserum for
its cross reaction with estrone sulfate, and the antiserum with the
lowest cross reactivity for estrone sulfate was used in the assay.
The cross reactivities of each of the estrogen glucosiduronate
antisera with unconjugated steroids is shown in Table I. Each of the
antisera showed significant cross reaction with some of the unconju-
gated estrogens.
Table II shows the cross reactivities of the antisera with conju-
gates of estrogens and with nonestrogenic steroid conjugates. The
following conjugated estrogens had significant cross reactivity:
estrone sulfate with the estrone glucosiduronate antiserum (3.911,
estriol-17-glucosiduronate with the 17B-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate
antiserum (5.4%) and with the estriol-16o-glucosiduronate antiserum
411
Table I. Percent cross reaction of various unconjugated steroids with antisera against protein derivatives of estrone glucosiduronate, 17G-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate and estriol-l&-glucosiduronate.
Compound
estrone 176-estradiol estriol 17a-estradiol 2-hydroxyestrone 2-hydroxyestradiol 2-hydroxyestriol estrone-2-methyl ether estrone-3-methyl ether 16-ketoestrone 16-ketoestradiol 16a-hydroxyestrone 16-epiestriol 17-epiestriol 16,17-epiestriol estetrol progesterone testosterone cortisol ethinylestradiol mestranol diethystilbestrol
Antisera against:
EJG/J E316aGA E217GGA
10.2
:::
;*: 0:o 0.0
1K 4:8 1.1 0.2 0.3
;*: 0:o 0.0 0.1
::: 0.0 0.0
18.4 11.7 15.0
;*z 0:3
K 0:o
1z 1717 7.0
3.; 3:9 0.0
K! 4:2
:::
1i.Y 2:3
89.5 0.4 0.2
Kl 0:5
::;
;:':
;*: 0:9 0.6
:*: 3:g 0.4 1.2
(4.3%), and estriol-16-sulfate with the 17B-estradiol-17-glucosiduron-
ate antiserum (4.2%) and the estriol-16a-glucosiduronate antiserum
(13.9%). None of the antisera showed significant cross reacitvity
with the nonestrogenic steroid conjugates.
Radioimmunoassay: Standard curves were established for each of the
estrogen glucosiduronates. A typical logit-log standard curve for
estrone glucosiduronate is shown in Fig. 1. The least detectable
amount for estrone glucosiduronate was 2.6 pg. The useful range of
412 S W=ZIBOID6
Table II. Percent cross reaction of various conjugated steroids with antisera against protein derivatives of estrone glucosiduronate, 176-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate and estriol-16a-glucosiduronate.
Antisera against:
Compound
estrone glucosiduronate estrone sulfate 17B-estradiol-17- glucosiduronate estriol-16a- glucosiduronate estradiol-3- glucosiduronate estriol-3- glucosiduronate estriol-3-sulfate estriol-17- glucosiduronate estriol-16-sulfate androsterone-3- glucosiduronate etiocholanolone-3- glucosiduronate testosterone-17i3- glucosiduronate pregnanediol-3- glucosiduronate dehydroisoandrosterone- 3-sulfate
E E316cxGA
100.0 0.7 3.9 0.1
0.0 1.6 00.0
0.0
1.6
0.0 4.3 5.4 0.6 13.9 4.2
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
100.0
1.4
0.7 0.0
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.2
E217BGA
0.6 0.5
1.7
1.1
1.4 0.5
0.2
1.0
0.7
1.7
0.2
the standard curve was found to be 2.6 - 80.0 pg.
A typical standard curve for 176-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate
is shown in Fig. 2. The useful range for this standard curve was
found to be 5.7 - 80 pg with the least detectable amount of 5.7 pg.
A typical logit-log standard curve for estriol-16a-glucosiduron-
ate is shown in Fig. 3. The least detectable dose for this estrogen
conjugate was shown to be 2.5 pg with a useful range of 2.5 - 80.0
Pg.
S -l?6EOIDb 413
99
98 1 97
96 95 1 80
1
IO
3
I
3
2
Fig. 1. A typical logit-log standard curve for direct assay of estrone glucosiduronate.
The intra-assay and interassay variation for each of the
estrogen glucosiduronate radioimmunoassays are shown in Table III.
The intra-assay variation was calculated from samples reading at 3
different points on the standard curve. The coefficients of
variation were less than 10% at each of the points. The interassay
variation was calculated from repeated analysis of a urine sample
from a normal woman (sample 1) and man (sample 2) in a number of
different assays.
414 s ‘SIIEOXD-
99
98
97 1 96 95 1
pg E,l7GA
Fig. 2. A typical logit-log standard curve for direct assay of 17B-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate.
Recovery experiments were carried out on a sample of urine
from a normal man. Three different amounts of each estrogen gluco-
siduronate were added to aliquots of the urine and the urine was
assayed. The results of this experiment are shown in Table IV.
In each case, the amount of each estrogen glucosiduronate assayed
was not significantly different from the amount added (~~0.05).
The validity of the direct assay for estrogen glucosiduronates
S TmEOflD- 415
I] I I , , , , , , I I I 1 I 2 3 45
rrlrrl
K) 2o 40 60 8OlOO 200 pg E,IGGA
Fig. 3. A typical logit-log standard curve for direct assay of estriol-16a-glucosiduronate.
was tested by comparing values obtained for urine samples assayed
directly with those obtained after purification by chromatography
on DEAE-Sephadex. The correlation of values obtained for estrone
glucosiduronate from 9 urine samples with and without chromatography
is shown in Fig. 4. The values showed a correlation coefficient of
0.98. The regression coefficient was 0.96 r 0.07 with an intercept
of 2.55 _C 1.94 ug/l.
416 S ‘B?DEOfD=
Table III. The intra-assay and interassay variation for the direct assay of estrone glucosiduronate, 17B-estradiol-17- glucosiduronate and estriol-16a-glucosiduronate in urine. See text for a description of the method for calculation.
INTRA-ASSAY VARIATION
(n=3)
SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2 SAMPLE 3
mean f SD CV mean k SD CV mean + SD CV (pg) (pg) (pg)
estrone glucosiduronate 11.7kl.l 9.32 51.21-0.5 1.02 79.3k2.2 2.73
176-estradiol-17- glucosiduronate 6.3kO.6 9.09 23.550.6 2.43 46.OkO.9 1.90
estriol-16a- glucosiduronate 9.4+0.3 3.09 20.4*0.3 1.42 49.6i2.3 4.68
INTERASSAY VARIATION
SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2
Number of mean + SD mean + SD Assays (PSI cv (pg) cv
estrone glucosiduronate
175-estradiol-17- glucosiduronate
estriol-16a- glucosiduronate
10 38.5k2.3 5.90 30.3k4.1 13.40
8 32.755.7 17.34 29.2k2.9 9.94
9 44.7k3.8 8.58 22.7k3.1 13.71
The correlation of values obtained from 6 urine samples for 178-
estradiol-17-glucosiduronate with and without chromatography is shown
in Fig. 5. The correlation coefficient was 0;97 with a regression
S TDEOIDI 417
Table IV. The mean values * SE measured in a sample of male urine after addition of known amounts of estrone glucosiduronate, 178-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate and estriol-16a-glucosid- uronate. The number of samples analyzed is shown in parentheses.
Steroid pg added pg recovered mean + SE (n)
estrone glucosiduronate
10.4 10.3 f 0.7 (10)
26.1 24.7 f 0.6 (10)
36.5 33.8 + 0.6 (10)
17f3-estradiol-17- glucosiduronate
11.5 11.4 + 0.6 (8)
28.7 28.3 + 1.1 (8)
40.1 39.4 + 1.5 (7)
estriol-16a- glucosiduronate
10.0 8.7 + 0.4 (8)
25.1 21.3 + 0.8 (7)
35.2 32.8 + 1.3 (4)
coefficientof 0.86 ? 0.10 and an intercept of 0.48 + 0.54 ug/l.
Fig. 6 shows the correlation of values obtained for estriol-16a-
glucosiduronate from 6 urine samples with and without chromatography.
The correlation coefficient was 0.99 with a regression coefficient of
1.01 i 0.04 and an intercept Of -0.31 f 0.44 Ug/l.
In the case of each estrogen glucosiduronate analyzed with and
without chromatography, the correlation coefficient was significantly
different from 0 (~~0.05). In all cases, the coefficient regres-
sionwas not significantly different from 1 (~~0.05) and the intercept
was not significantly different from 0 (~~0.05).
418 S =EmEOXDI
y = 0.96x + 2.55
r = .98
I I I I I
RldOwith 20 CHROMATOGRAPHY 30 40 50 (pg/l)
Fig. 4. Correlation of values for estrone glucosiduronate in 9 samples of urine from males and nonpregnant females estimated by direct radioimnunoassay and by radioimmunoassay after chromatographic separation on DEAE-Sephadex. The line relating the values is the calculated regression line.
Urinary Values: Urine samples from normal men and women in the mid-
follicular (day 8) and midluteal (day 22) phases of the cycle were
analyzed by direct radioimnunoassay and expressed as F-g/g creatinine.
The mean values and ranges are summarized in Table V.
419
IO-
22 g- \ - ;;3
8-
7;’ E 6-
b =- W a 4-
3 3-
2- y = 0.86x + 0.48
1 4 I I I I I I I I I I
1234561891011
RIA after CH~~ATOGRAPHY (pg/l) Fig. 5. Correlation of values for 176-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate in
6 samples of urine from males and nonpregnant females esti- mated by direct radioimmunoassay and by radioimmunoassay after chromatographic separation on DEAE-Sephadex. The line relating the values is the calculated regression line.
Of the three conjugates measured, estrone glucosiduronate was the
major estrogen glucosiduronate excreted in both men and women. The
mean value + SE obtained in men was 10.1 + 0.6 ug/g creatinine,
whereas women in the follicular and luteal phases had mean values
of 17.3 f 1.6 and 31.8 * 2.5 ug/g creatinine respectively. The
estriol-16a-glucosiduronate values were considerably lower than the
420 S TBEOXDl
257
5-
1 I I I 1
5 IO 15 20 25
RIA with CHROMATOGRAPHY (&I)
Fig. 6. Correlation of values for estriol-16a-glucosiduronate in 6 samples of urine from males and nonpregnant females estimated by radioimmunoassay after chromatographic separation on DEAE-Sephadex. The line relating the values is the calcu- lated regression line.
estrone glucosiduronate values in both men and women. The 176-
estradiol-17-glucosiduronate values were less than the estriol-16cl-
glucosiduronate values in women.
Statistical analysis of the excretion patterns (Table V) indicates
that the excretion of estrone glucosiduronate, 176-estradiol-17-
TABL
E V.
Me
an co
ncen
trat
ion
k SE
(w
ith ra
nges
in
par
enth
eses
) of
es
tron
e gl
ucos
idur
onat
e,
176-
estr
adio
l-17
-glu
cosi
duro
nate
an
d es
trio
l-16
a-gl
ucos
idur
onat
e in
th
e ur
ine
of men
an
d wo
men
in th
e mi
dfol
licu
lar
(day
8)
and
midl
utea
l (d
ay 22)
ph
ases
of
the me
nstr
ual
cycl
e de
term
ined
by
dir
ect
radi
oinm
unoa
ssay
. Va
lues
ar
e ex
pres
sed
as p
g/g
crea
tini
ne.
p fo
r di
ff.
p fo
r di
ff.
foll
icul
ar fe
male
lu
teal
fe
male
be
twee
n ma
le
betw
een
male
me
an t
SE (n
) me
an +
SE (n
) fo
llic
ular
me
an f
SE (n
) &
foll
icul
ar
rang
e ra
nge
& lu
teal
ra
nge
phas
e
17.3
rt
1.
6 (1
8)
estr
one
gluc
osid
uron
ate
(6.8
_ 31
.5)
31.8
+
2.5
(15)
10
.1 +
0.6
(6)
(9.8
- 4
7.9)
c.
01
(7.6
- 11
.3)
c.05
17B-
estr
adio
l-17
- 2.
4 I
0.1
(78)
4.
2 f
0.4
(15)
1.
7 ?r
0.3
(6)
gluc
osid
uron
ate
(0.9
- 3.4
) (2
.2 -
7.
5)
1.01
(1
.0 -
2.9)
c.
05
estr
iol-
16a-
gl
ucos
idur
onat
e
4.7
+ 0.
9 (1
8)
10.0
*
1.6
(15)
1.
8 k
0.2
(6)
(1.3
- 16
.5)
(3.2
- 23
.4)
<.Ol
(1
.0 -
2.5
) c.
05
422 S TlOICOXDIll
glucosiduronate and estriol-16a-glucosiduronate was significantly
lower in men than in women during the follicular phase. The
excretion of all three estrogen glucosiduronates was significantly
elevated in the luteal phase of the cycle when compared with the
follicular phase.
DISCUSSION
The antisera against each of the estrogen glucosiduronates was
prepared by linking the protein to the carboxylic group of the gluco-
siduronic acid rather than introducing a carboxylic acid group into
the estrogen molecule at another point. This procedure has been used
by several laboratories to prepare antisera against steroid glucosid-
uronates (9,11,13). Based on our previous experience with the devel-
opment of antisera against free estrogens (13), we expected the
greatest amount of cross reactivity to occur in the region where the
glucosiduronate molecule is attached to the estrogen. A review of
the cross reactivities in Tables I and II indicate that this was
generally true.
The significant cross reaction of the estrogen glucosiduronate
antisera with the unconjugated estrogens does not present a problem
in the urinary assay because of the extremely low concentration of
the latter in urine. None of the steroid conjugates showed any
significant cross reaction with the antibody to estrone glucosid-
uronate. None of the major estriol or 176-estradiol conjugates
present in significant concentration in urine showed significant
cross reaction with the estriol-16a-glucosiduronate or 176-estradiol-
17-glucosiduronate antisera. The only ring-D conjugates showing
significant cross reaction with either antiserum were estriol-16-
sulfate and estriol-17-glucosiduronate. These two estriol conjugates
are not thought to be present in significant amounts in urine.
The values for estrone glucosiduronate in normal men and women
are the first report of direct analysis of estrone glucosiduronate in
urine. The data presented in Table V indicate that the excretion of
estrone glucosiduronate is significantly lower in men than in women
during the follicular phase of the cycle. Estrone glucosiduronate
excretion is significantly increased in the luteal phase of the cycle.
Comparison of the values obtained by our direct method with other
methods requiring hydrolysis (3,4) suggest that estrone glucosid-
uronate is a major conjugate of estrone in the urine.
The values for estriol-16a-glucosiduronate reported here are
similar to those reported by Lehtinen and Adlercreutz (16) using a
direct radioimmunoassay. The values indicate that there is a signif-
icant rise in the.excretion of estriol-16a-glucosiduronate in urine
during the luteal phase of the cycle. The values reported here for
the excretion of estriol-16a-glucosiduronate by men were signifi-
cantly lower than those for women in the follicular phase. The
levels of estriol-16a-glucosiduronate are slightly lower than those
reported for total estriol in both men and women (3,4). This
suggests that while estriol-16a-glucosiduronate is a major form of
estriol in the urine, other metabolites are also present. Previous
work with radioactive metabolites of estriol in urine of nonpregnant
women suggests that significant amounts of estriol-3-glucosiduronate
and estriol-3-sulfate-16a-glucosiduronate are also excreted (17,18).
424 S TmEOIDm
This is also the first report of direct analysis of 17&estradiof-
17-glucosiduronate in urine of men or women. The values reported here
suggest that the excretion of 176-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate is
considerably lower than either estrone glucosiduronate or estriof-
?6o-glucosiduronate in women. The excretion of 176-estradiol-17-
glucosiduronate was also significantly increased during the luteal
phase.
When the values for 17~-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate were
compared to the total estradiol levels in urine from previous work
(3,4), it is clear that 17B-estradiol-17"glucosiduronate is a major
urinary form of estradiol-176 in women.
Thus, we have reported the development of specific radioimmuno-
assay procedures for the analysis of estrone glucosiduronate, estriol-
16a-glucosiduronate and 17B-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate in urine.
These procedures are specific and sensitive enough to measure these
estrogen glucosiduronates in men and nonpregnant women. They will
enable us to measure the levels of these specific estrogen gluco-
siduronates throughout the menstrual cycle and during various
disease states where an alteration in the metabolism of estrogens
might be expected.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by NIH Grants ROl-HL-16394 and ROl- AM-13468. Dr. Collins is a recipient of U.S. Public Health Service Career Research Development Award l-K04-AM-70381 from the National Institute of Arthritis, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases.
REFERENCES
1. Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Ct. 06510.
S tl?FEIEOXDb 425
2.
3.
4. 5.
6. 7.
a.
9.
10.
Address reprint requests to: Dr. D.C. Collins, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 69 Butler St., S.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Brown, J.B., (1958).
A. Klopper and J.A. Loraine, J ENDOCRINOL 17:401 -
Preedy, J.R.K. and E.H. Aitken, J BIOL CHEM 236:1300 (1961). Musey, P.I., D.C. Collins and J.R.K. Preedy, STEROIDS 29:93 (1977).
-
Hahnel,R., ANAL BIOCHEM lo:184 (1965). Young, B.K., H. Ji rku, STKadner and M. Levitz, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 126:38 (1976). Levitz, M., H. Jirku, S. Kadner and B.K. Young, J STEROID BIOCHEM 6:663 (1975). Nellie, A.E., V.K. Samuel, W.J. Riley and D.M. Robertson, J STEROID BIOCHEM 6:91 (1975). The following trrvial names are used: androsterone-3-glucosiduronate=17-oxo-5c-androstan-3~-yl-~-D- glucopyranosiduronate; dehydroisoandrosterone-3-sulfate=17-oxoandrost-5-en-3~-yl- sulfate; 16-epiestriol=estra-1,3,5(lO)-triene-3,16B,l78-triol; 16,17-epiestriol=estra-1,3,5 lO)-triene-3,1@,17a-triol; 17-epiestriol=estra-1,3,5(10 -triene-3-16a,l7a-triol; I estetro1=estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,15~,16~,17~=tetro1; 17~-estradiol-3-glucosiduronate=l7~-hydroxyestra-l,3,5(lO 3-yl-B-D-glucopyranosiduronate; 178-estradiol-17-glucosiduronate=3-hydroxyestra-l,3,5(10) 17B-yl-B-D-glucopyranosiduronate; estrio1-3-g1ucosiduronate=16~,178-dihydroxyestra-1,3,5(10 ) 3-yl-B-D-glucopyranosiduronate; estriol-16a-glucosiduronate=3,17~-dihydroxyestra-l,3,5(10
-trien-
trien-
-trien-
-trien- 1 16a-yl-B-D-glucopyranosiduronate; estriol-17-glucosiduronate=3,l6~-dihydroxyestra-l,3,5(lO)-trien- 17B-yl-B-D-glucopyranosiduronate; estriol-3-sulfate=16a,l7~-dihydroxyestra-l,3,5(lO)-trien-3-yl- sulfate; estriol-16-sulfate=3,l7~-dihydroxyestra-l,3,5(lO)-trien-l6~-yl- sulfate; estrone glucosiduronate=17-oxoestra-1,3,5(lO)-trien-3-yl-~-D- glucopyranosiduronate; estrone sulfate=17-oxoestra-1,3,5(lO)-trien-3-yl-sulfate; ethinylestradiol=17a-ethinylestra-1,3,5(lO)-triene-3,l7~-diol; etiocholanolone-3-glucosiduronate=17-oxo-5~-androstan-3~-yl-~-D- glucopyranosiduronate; 2-hydroxyestradiol=estra-1,3,5(lO)-triene-2,3,17B-triol; Z-hydroxyestrone=2,3-dihydroxyestra-1,3,5(lO)-trien-l7-one; 16a-hydroxyestrone=3,16cL-dihydroxyestra-1,3,5(lO)-trien-17-one; 16-ketoestradiol=3,178-dihydroxyestra~,3,5(lO)-trien-l6-one; 16-ketoestrone=3-hydroxyestra-1,3,5(lO)-trien-16,17-dione; mestranol= 3-methoxy-17-ethinylestr~-1,3,5(1O)-trien-l7~-ol; estrone-Z-methyl ether= 2-methoxy-3-hydroxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien- 17-one.
426 S TmEOIDI
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16. 17. 18.
estrone-3-methyl ether= 3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17- one; pregnanediol-3-glucosiduronate=2O~-hydroxy-5%-pregnan-3~-yl-~-D- glucopyranosiduronate; testosterone-17B-glucosiduronate=3-oxoandrost-4-en-l7~-yl-~-D- glucopyranosiduronate; Hennan, J.F., W.P. Collins and I.F. Sommerville, STEROIDS 21:285 (1973).
-
Erlanqer, B.F., S.M. Beiser, F. Borek, F. Edel and S. Lieberman, Methods in Immunology and Immunochemistry (Eds., Williams, C.A. 2, Vol 1, p. 148 (1967). an M.W. ase , Wright, K., (1973).
D.C. Collins and J.R.K. Preedy, STEROIDS 21:755 -
Wright, K., D.C. Collins and J.R.K. Preedy, J STEROID BIOCHEM 5:303 (1974). Uright, K., D.C. Collins, M. Virkler, P.I. Musey, E. Dale and J.R.K. Preedy, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, In Press (1978). Lehtinen, T. and H. Adlercreutz, J STEROID BIOCHEM 8:99 (1977). Stoa, K.F. and M. Levitz, ACTA ENDOCRINOL 57:657 (lg68). Levitz, M. and J. Katz, J CLIN ENDOCRINOL STAB 28:862 (1968). -