difference two groups 1. content experimental research methods: prospective randomization,...

21
Difference Two Groups 1

Upload: clarence-johns

Post on 25-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

1

Difference Two Groups

Page 2: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

2

Content•Experimental Research•Methods:

•Prospective•Randomization, •Manipulation•Control

•Research designs•Validity

•Construct•Internal•External•Statistical

•Process for Analysis of Difference•Scale of Measurement•Z and t

Page 3: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

3

Research Steps Overview http://www.experiment-resources.com/

Page 4: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

4

Experimental Research

• Prospective Analysis of Difference• Random selection and assignment of

participants to treatment and conditions• Manipulation and control used to establish

causality between variables• Investigator manipulates and controls

participants and conditions

Page 5: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

5

Methods:

• Theoretical framework “a priori”• Participant selection and assignment random• Precision of Measurement• Numerical Data• Manipulation Present• Control Maximized

Page 6: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

Two Group Experimental Designs

R X integrated treatment O

R X standard of care O

OrChange

Score

R O X integrated treatment O O-O = Δ

R O X standard of care O O-O = ΔKey: R = Random Assignment X = Treatment O = Measurement Observation

6

Page 7: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

7

Validity

• Internal Validity “truth in the experiment”– How sure are you that the manipulation of the

independent variable caused the outcome in the dependent variable?

• Construct Validity “theoretical validity”– How well does your theory, measures,

independent and dependent variables fit together?

Page 8: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

8

Validity

• Statistical Conclusion– Is there truth in measurement and inference?

• External Validity– Do these results generalize to the real world?

Page 9: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

Validity Considerations

Construct Validity

External Validity

Statistical Conclusion

Validity

Internal Validity

9

Page 10: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

10

Population N

Select Sample n

Calculate and X S

S

n

Calculate Test Statistic

Compare P with Alpha value

Statistic

Standard error of the statistic

Make Statistical Inference Population(Mean, Confidence Interval,

Significant Differencebetween Groups)

Population Parameter?

Process for Analysis of Difference

Check assumptions to select appropriate test statistic

Design, select, control, assign appropriate to study purpose

Page 11: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

11

Measurement ScaleNominal Nonparametric

Category Mode Frequency

Ordinal Nonparametric

Category Rank Median Rank

Interval Parametric

Category Rank Distance Mean Average

Ratio Parametric

Category Rank Distance Zero Point Mean Average

Page 12: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

12

Z Normal Distribution

Page 13: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

13

Testing for Normal Distribution• Normal Distribution Assumption for Parametric Tests

• The Shapiro Wilk test evaluates your sample for normal distribution• To use the mean as a central tendency measure for your sample, you want your sample distribution to not

differ statistically from the normal distribution• For this assumption you want the null hypothesis of no statistical difference of your sample distribution

from the true normal distribution• You want your p value to be greater than 0.05 for the Shapiro Wilk test to be in the “accept null region” ;

This would mean your sample data can be considered normal

• Results:: n = 10 Mean = 86.8 SD = 1.4757295747452441 W = 0.9367971792829276 Threshold (p=0.01) = 0.781000018119812 --> HO accepted Threshold (p=0.05) = 0.8420000076293945 --> HO accepted; p=0.842 which is greater than 0.05 threshold Threshold (p=0.10) = 0.8690000176429749 --> HO accepted --> Your data seems normal

http://dittami.gmxhome.de/shapiro/ results from Shoulder Range data8485898687 87 87 88 88 87

Page 14: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

14

t distribution basic introduction understandable http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoV_TL0IDGA

Z and t probability table two tailedhttp://statpages.org/pdfs.html

t distribution probability graphichttp://www.stat.tamu.edu/~west/applets/tdemo.html

t distribution probability graphic one and two tailhttp://onlinestatbook.com/calculators/t_calc.html

Page 15: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

15

Check assumptions for 2 Independent Groups

• Independent t test– 2 independent groups– Normal distribution each

group– Equal variance between

groups (note alternate form of test that does not require equal variance)

– Interval or ratio scale

• Mann-Whitney– 2 independent groups– Ordinal, interval, or ratio

scale

• Chi-squareFisher Exact– 2 independent groups– Nominal scale (discussed

later in the semester in detail)

Page 16: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

Mean and 95% CI; Medians and IQ Range

76.00

77.00

78.00

79.00

80.00

81.00

82.00

83.00

84.00

95% Standard Error of the Mean Confidence In-terval

Control Exp1 Exp 2

Page 17: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

Null and Alternative Hypothesis Based on Statistical Inference

The criteria for acceptance and rejection of the null hypotheses can be demonstrated using the normal probability distribution.

The null hypothesis written as Ho: p ≥ 0.05 indicates no statistical difference between measures. With a probability greater than 0.05, you are within the non-rejection region of the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis of no statistical difference is retained (accepted).

The alternative hypothesis written as Ha: p ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical difference between measures. With a probability less than 0.05, you are within the rejection region of the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis of no statistical difference is rejected and the alternative hypothesis of difference is retained.

non-rejectionregion 95%

Page 18: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

Confidence interval of Difference Graphic of Statistical DifferenceTo answer the question statistically the 95% confidence interval of difference will need to be calculated. For this question the alpha was set at 0.05, 5% which means we would need to compute our confidence interval of difference at 95%.

All three two group comparisons overlap the zero point as an indication of no difference. All three pairwise treatment conditions retained the null hypothesis of no difference.

For example, the 95% confidence interval of difference between the control and experimental group 1 indicates that there is 95% confidence that the degree of difference between these two treatment populations was between a negative -5.8⁰ to a positive 9.2⁰. Since the confidence interval crosses zero, we fail to have statistical difference between these two treatment approaches

Page 19: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

19

0

1

2

3

4

5

95% CI Pairwise Difference Between Groups

1 and 2 1 and 3 2 and 3

DV

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

95% Standard Error of the Mean Confidence In-terval

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Page 20: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

Distinguish Between Statistical Difference and Clinical Relevance

• Statistical difference is math based on probability. It does not establish if there is a clinical difference in client outcome.

• Clinical relevance should result in a discernible change for client outcome. http://www.rehabmeasures.org/rehabweb/allmeasures.aspx?PageView=Shared

• Beyond statistical difference, a study should also address if there is a clinical difference in client outcome

Page 21: Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal

21

References and Links• Experiment-Resources.com (2008). Research Methodology. Retrieved 17 Aug. 2012 from Experiment

Resources: http://www.experiment-resources.com/research-methodology.html

Research Steps, Design, Construct, Internal, External, Construct, Statistical Conclusion Validity http://www.experiment-resources.com/

• Z and t probability table two tailed http://statpages.org/pdfs.html

• t distribution good basic content introductionhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoV_TL0IDGA

• t distribution a little more detail in content discussion (optional) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU_3fLy2SKs&feature=c-shelf-119

• How to calculate a t test Please watch (for understanding only, you do not have to do this hand calculation)

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeH3Uzrjavg&feature=plcp

• Vassar Stats Online Textbook: Chapter 11 Independent t test (optional http://vassarstats.net/textbook/