diagnostic odds ratio

Diagnostic Odds Ratio 0,01 100,0 1 Auslender 34,78 (2,04 - 593,79) Zannoni 62,15 (8,55 - 451,56) Bakour 22,47 (1,28 - 393,49) Botsis 115,48 (6,32 - 2.109,25) Fistonic 7,00 (0,40 - 123,10) Garuti 29,25 (4,00 - 213,73) Granberg 246,16 (15,26 - 3.970,34) Guner 34,36 (2,04 - 578,15) Haller 11,91 (0,68 - 209,19) Tsuda 23,75 (3,04 - 185,50) Varner 5,77 (0,23 - 143,37) Abu Ghazzeh 1,86 (0,07 - 46,84) Briley 11,26 (0,61 - 206,72) Cacciatore 3,39 (0,17 - 68,12) DeSilva 1,46 (0,12 - 17,56) Granberg 53,86 (3,05 - 950,71) Grigoriou 98,32 (5,90 - 1.638,95) Gu 5,91 (0,29 - 119,06) Gupta 3,54 (0,31 - 40,93) Hänggi 22,00 (5,71 - 84,78) Ivanov 29,00 (1,64 - 513,45) Karlsson 25,74 (3,23 - 205,10) Loverro 258,78 (14,83 - 4.514,43) Malinova 135,80 (8,15 - 2.264,08) Merz 21,90 (1,23 - 391,31) Nasri 28,85 (1,56 - 531,94) Nasri 20,60 (1,12 - 378,06) Pertl 6,56 (0,84 - 51,00) Suchocki 7,96 (0,46 - 138,73) Taviani 5,81 (0,26 - 128,90) Weber 39,29 (5,22 - 295,45) Wolman 15,81 (0,81 - 310,35) Moreles 15,43 (3,50 - 68,07) Rudigoz 9,92 (1,80 - 54,49) Todorova 5,00 (0,18 - 136,32) Gruboeck 34,20 (6,45 - 181,32) Chan 56,54 (3,21 - 994,48) Degenhardt 12,22 (4,35 - 34,30) Dijkhuizen 16,46 (0,91 - 297,75) Brolmann 23,38 (1,31 - 418,59) Ceccini 37,28 (4,86 - 285,93) Masearetti 9,47 (0,43 - 208,76) Mortakis 20,41 (1,12 - 371,17) Schramm 1,64 (0,73 - 3,68) Smith 10,38 (0,53 - 205,27) Osmers 55,00 (3,31 - 913,67) Seelbach-Göbel 14,26 (3,34 - 60,84) Altuncu et al. 170,00 (9,11 - 3.172,49) Diagnostic OR (95% CI) Random Effects Model Pooled Diagnostic Odds Ratio = 17,48 (11,59 to 26,37) Cochran-Q = 70,56; df = 47 (p = 0,0147) Inconsistency (I-square) = 33,4 % Tau-square = 0,6179

Upload: carson-glass

Post on 30-Dec-2015

23 views

Category:

Documents

1 download

Report

Download

Embed Size (px):

DESCRIPTION

Diagnostic OR (95% CI). Auslender. 34,78 (2,04 - 593,79). Zannoni. 62,15 (8,55 - 451,56). Bakour. 22,47 (1,28 - 393,49). Botsis. 115,48 (6,32 - 2.109,25). Fistonic. 7,00 (0,40 - 123,10). Garuti. 29,25 (4,00 - 213,73). Granberg. 246,16 (15,26 - 3.970,34). Guner. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Diagnostic Odds Ratio

0,01 100,01

Auslender 34,78 (2,04 - 593,79)Zannoni 62,15 (8,55 - 451,56)Bakour 22,47 (1,28 - 393,49)Botsis 115,48 (6,32 - 2.109,25)Fistonic 7,00 (0,40 - 123,10)Garuti 29,25 (4,00 - 213,73)Granberg 246,16 (15,26 - 3.970,34)Guner 34,36 (2,04 - 578,15)Haller 11,91 (0,68 - 209,19)Tsuda 23,75 (3,04 - 185,50)Varner 5,77 (0,23 - 143,37)Abu Ghazzeh 1,86 (0,07 - 46,84)Briley 11,26 (0,61 - 206,72)Cacciatore 3,39 (0,17 - 68,12)DeSilva 1,46 (0,12 - 17,56)Granberg 53,86 (3,05 - 950,71)Grigoriou 98,32 (5,90 - 1.638,95)Gu 5,91 (0,29 - 119,06)Gupta 3,54 (0,31 - 40,93)Hänggi 22,00 (5,71 - 84,78)Ivanov 29,00 (1,64 - 513,45)Karlsson 25,74 (3,23 - 205,10)Loverro 258,78 (14,83 - 4.514,43)Malinova 135,80 (8,15 - 2.264,08)Merz 21,90 (1,23 - 391,31)Nasri 28,85 (1,56 - 531,94)Nasri 20,60 (1,12 - 378,06)Pertl 6,56 (0,84 - 51,00)Suchocki 7,96 (0,46 - 138,73)Taviani 5,81 (0,26 - 128,90)Weber 39,29 (5,22 - 295,45)Wolman 15,81 (0,81 - 310,35)Moreles 15,43 (3,50 - 68,07)Rudigoz 9,92 (1,80 - 54,49)Todorova 5,00 (0,18 - 136,32)Gruboeck 34,20 (6,45 - 181,32)Chan 56,54 (3,21 - 994,48)Degenhardt 12,22 (4,35 - 34,30)Dijkhuizen 16,46 (0,91 - 297,75)Brolmann 23,38 (1,31 - 418,59)Ceccini 37,28 (4,86 - 285,93)Masearetti 9,47 (0,43 - 208,76)Mortakis 20,41 (1,12 - 371,17)Schramm 1,64 (0,73 - 3,68)Smith 10,38 (0,53 - 205,27)Osmers 55,00 (3,31 - 913,67)Seelbach-Göbel 14,26 (3,34 - 60,84)Altuncu et al. 170,00 (9,11 - 3.172,49)

Diagnostic OR (95% CI)

Random Effects ModelPooled Diagnostic Odds Ratio = 17,48 (11,59 to 26,37)Cochran-Q = 70,56; df = 47 (p = 0,0147)Inconsistency (I-square) = 33,4 %Tau-square = 0,6179

Sediment Fe:PO ratio as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for

ANALYSIS - ProjectImplicit · age, our small study will find an odds ratio of 1.20 but, because of random errors, our study may in fact find an odds ratio smaller than 1.20 (for example,

drugs1 - uade.inpsiquiatria.edu.mx Jorge/1998/1998_drug_use_pathways.pdfDrug use in Mexican students 2. Relation between alcohd, tobacco and drug use Females 1581 % Odds ratio Odds

Categorical Data Prof. Andy Field. Slide 2 Aims Categorical Data –Contingency Tables –Chi-Square test –Likelihood Ratio –Odds Ratio Loglinear Models –Theory

Assignment 6 - University of British Columbiaschmidtm/Courses/340-F15/t6.pdf · Assignment 6. Question 1.1 Odds ratio Linear model Objective function. Question 1.1 Odds ratio Linear

Michael A Heneghan, MD, MMedSc, FRCPI. Institute of Liver ... · •associated with antibodies to SLA/LP (odds ratio 51; p < 0.003) •and Ro/SSA (odds ratio 27; p < 0.02). Of 35

Case-Control Studies and Odds Ratio STAT 6395 Spring 2008 Filardo and Ng

BMC Medical Research Methodology BioMed Central...Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis Mir Said Siadaty* and Jianfen Shu Address: Division

Investigation Report · Web viewPredictors Odds ratio 95% C.I. for odds ratio Sig. Lower Upper Adverse mental states 45.97 26.09 81.00

Lesson #11 Relative Risk and the Odds Ratio

Group-Sequential Non-Inferiority Tests for the Odds Ratio

Logistic Regression and Odds Ratios 818 - Lecture 0… · Odds Ratio Used to compare two proportions across groups odds for males =.54/(1-.53) = 1.13 odds for females = .62/(1-.62)