diac session 2, november 18 2010 policies and programs professor adam graycar

31
DIAC Session 2, November 18 2010 Policies and Programs Professor Adam Graycar

Upload: merryl-charles

Post on 29-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

DIAC Session 2, November 18 2010 Policies and Programs

Professor Adam Graycar

2

The role of government in market economies

• Facilitating Role• Allocation Function• Distribution Function

• Stabilisation Function

[email protected]

3

Facilitating Role• Ensuring conditions for competitive

markets to operate• Providing the legal structure for

contractual arrangements and exchanges

Allocation Function• Addressing market failures• Providing ‘public goods’

The role of government in market economies

[email protected]

4

The role of government in market economies

Distribution Function

• Reflecting social values including acceptable distribution of income and wealth

Stabilisation Function

• Policies for full employment, price stability and desirable economic growth

• Reflecting the public, as distinct from a private, view of the value of the future

[email protected]

5

Role of government questions

• Who should act - government, market, family etc?

• Policy initiation or response?

• Source of policy initiation or response

[email protected]

6

Role of government questions

Is this a function for government, the market, individuals or families, or charitable activity?

If a mixture, are the other players meeting their share (e.g. through user charges)?

Is this the responsibility of the Commonwealth, or of the states or local government?

Is there serious risk of government failure if it took on the responsibility?

[email protected]

7

Politics of policy developmentElection platforms (sourced from parties, interest groups,

plus public service for government)

Ministers and advisers (from personal networks, party, interest groups)

Public service (from program data, experience, environment scanning, external experts, interest groups)

Interest groups (include service providers, client groups, sectoral interests)

[email protected]

8

Politics of policy development (cont)

States/local government (from program experience, own financial interests, own political interests)

Public (clients, taxpayers, community members/citizens)

Media (stories, crises)

[email protected]

What’s the issue with the program?

How bad is the problem?

Severity, likely to get worse?

Scope and impact

How pressing?

New, unexpected or perennial?

 

[email protected]

10

• Where are we now and where are we going?

 • Where do we want to get to?

 • How do we get there?

[email protected]

11

In order to get there:

• Vision and values • Evidence and analysis • Understanding of stakeholders • Delivery capabilities

[email protected]

12

Issue context

• What are the drivers of the SHP program?

• What legislation is relevant?• Think ahead on where the problem

might lead - current and future impacts

[email protected]

13

For whom is it a problem?

• For program clients (or potential clients)?

• For other program stakeholders?

• For taxpayers?

• For the public more generally?

• For those fundamentally opposed to the endorsed policy?

• Where is ‘the public interest’[email protected]

14

Routine/ exceptional

[email protected]

Routine

Clients

Exceptional

RoutineExceptional

Issues

15

Locating the problem

• Are policy objectives appropriate/ inappropriate?

• Are other policy objectives being undermined?

• Is the problem primarily administrative?

• Is it primarily a communications/perceptions issue

[email protected]

16

Locating the problem• Are the policy objectives inappropriate? Are they

inconsistent with broader social, economic, environmental policies?

• Are key policy objectives not being met? ‘Needs’ not addressed? Or not met effectively? Or efficiently?

• Are other policy objectives being undermined? Is the balance wrong?

[email protected]

17

Locating the problem? (cont)• Is the problem primarily administrative? e.g.

missing key target groups, slow, cumbersome, costly

• Is it primarily a communications/perceptions issue?

[email protected]

18

Managing the politics

• Working with the minister and office

• Working across government

• External consultation and engagement

• Managing communications – a professional business

[email protected]

19

Tackling the problem

• Analytical techniques

• Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)

• Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA)

• Opportunity Costs (OC)

[email protected]

20

Policy Instruments

• Advocacy

• Networking

• Money

• Government action• Law

Althaus, Bridgman, Davis

[email protected]

21

Instruments - detail

Money• Fiscal powers• Taxing• Incentive payments• Grants (including States Grants)

Government action• New institutions• Direct service programs• Purchaser/provider • Administrative decisions

[email protected]

22

Instruments, cont’d

Law• Legislation• Regulation• Parliamentary resolution• Administrative action (under law)

[email protected]

23

Some more framework thoughts

• Conditions/ problems• Investment/ consumption• Need / want• Risk/ vulnerability• Risk factors/ protective factors

[email protected]

24

Implementation

• Policy development phase

• Governance

• Risk management

• Implementation planning

• Procurement & contract mgt

• Stakeholder management

• Resources

• Communications

• Monitoring & [email protected]

25

Implementation (from ANAO/PM&C)

Policy development phase• Policy/administration linkages• Identifying, assessing, advising on risks• Consideration of time frame• Contingency provision

Governance• Roles and responsibilities• Steering committees, taskforces, project teams• Monitoring and review

[email protected]

26

Implementation (cont) (from ANAO/PM&C)

Risk management• Early identifying and assessing risks• Links to central agencies• Working with outside stakeholders• Managing risks• Managing consequences, escalation

Implementation planning• Including critical path, milestones etc

[email protected]

27

Implementation (cont) (from ANAO/PM&C)

Procurement and contract management• Strategy• Expertise etc

Stakeholder management• Who, when, what, how

Resources• Staffing and skills• Change management• Finances• Systems

[email protected]

28

Implementation (cont) (from ANAO/PM&C)

Communications• Communications strategy as essential

component of implementation

Monitoring and review

[email protected]

29

Typical hurdles• Useful early administrative advice• Clarifying the risk tolerance level up front• Getting legislation passed, as intended, on

time• Negotiating with the States or others• Getting systems & procedures up and

running reliably• Keeping staff in place

[email protected]

30

Typical hurdles• Getting expert advice from the administrative

arm at an early stage of policy development• Particularly if that expertise is not available in-house

or in-portfolio or in-government

• Clarifying the risk tolerance level up front

• Getting legislation passed, as intended, on time

• Negotiating with the States or other critical third parties

• And managing conflicts of interest

[email protected]

31

Typical hurdles(cont)

• Getting systems up and running reliably

• Developing procedures, training the trainers, training staff

• particularly if trained staff needed within third parties

• Holding the senior project manager in the position until implementation is embedded

[email protected]