diabetic nephropathy: a comprehensive review for health ......citation: chowdhury sr, tanzil t,...
TRANSCRIPT
-
International Journal of Diabetes and Endocrinology
Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals
Re
sear
ch A
rtic
le
Sumon Rahman Chowdhury*1, Tasnuva Tanzil2, Rezaul Haider Chowdhury3, Alam Mohammad Sharif 4
1Senior Medical Officer, Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chittagong Diabetic General Hospital, Chittagong 2Assistant Registrar, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Chattogram Medical College Hospital 3Consultant Internist, Department of Internal Medicine, Chittagong Diabetic General Hospital 4Consultant, Department of Physical Medicine, Chittagong Diabetic General Hospital
Corresponding author: Sumon Rahman Chowdhury, Senior Medical Officer, Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chittagong Diabetic General Hospital, Chittagong. Tel: 01670393031; E-mail: [email protected]
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
Received Date: 12 November, 2020; Accepted Date: 16 November, 2020; Published Date: 23 November, 2020
Keywords: Diabetic Nephropathy, Diabetes, Health Care Professionals
Introduction
Diabetic Nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of ESRD in the UK. In 2012, DN accounted for 26% of cases ESRD [1], and 40% diabetics will develop DN [2].
The features of DN are increasing urinary albumin excretion, rising BP and declining renal function [3]. There are specific pathological changes with five different stages. The key is the level of urinary albumin excretion-microalbuminuria (incipient nephropathy) or macroalbuminuria/proteinuria (overt nephropathy) [4]. As it is an asymptomatic process screening is required [2, 3].
Normal Microalbuminuria Macroalbuminuria
ACR- Albumin/Creatinine
Ratio (mg/mmol)
-
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
In T1DM microalbuminuria usually appears after 5-15 years post diagnosis, with proteinuria/ macroalbuminuria found in 15-40% [2, 5]. Not all will have increasing UAE in T1DM a third will revert to normal [7].
Risk factors include duration of DM, hyperglycaemia, hypertension, ethnicity and genetic factors. The UKPDS and DCCT showed that improved glycaemia reduced progression
[4, 8, 9], and in T2DM, controlling hypertension reduces risk
[4]. Suppression of RAS is the key to risk reduction [2, 3, 10].
There is increased cardiovascular risk [2, 3]. Compared to normal UAE, microalbuminuria increases CVD risk by 2-3 times. With proteinuria this risk is increased by 103.
Diabetic nephropathy can be easily screened for and the modification of risk factors can improve the outcome. We will discuss the risk factors, pathogenesis, staging and treatment of this important cause of mortality and morbidity.
Search Strategy
Available studies and abstracts were identified through Pub Med and Medline data bases (From 1998-2019) and Cochrane data bases. Key search terms were diabetes and nephropathy. All available studies and abstracts describing the relationship between diabetes and nephropathy were included. The reference list of review articles was also searched.
Discussion
Epidemiology
Approximately 463 million people worldwide have diabetes and the prevalence is expected to rise to 700 million in the next 20 years [11]. This growing epidemic carries with it an increasing burden of micro and macrovascular complications. Diabetic nephropathy is one of the serious microvascular complications of diabetes [12].
Diabetic nephropathy is defined as eGFR of 30 mg/g. It occurs in up to 40% of all patients with diabetes [13] and accounts for >44% of ESRD patients [14]. The prevalence of DN has doubled over the past decade, especially in areas of high prevalence of diabetes like USA, Japan and Europe. About 50% of DN patients will progress to ESRD within 10 years of diagnosis, increasing to 75% in 20 years if no preventive measures are implemented [13].
Diabetic nephropathy contributes significantly to the economic burden of diabetes. In UK, the cost of diabetic complications in
2011/2012 was estimated at £14 billion, by 2035/2036 this is expected to rise to £22 billion. Worldwide, healthcare costs for diabetic patients are much higher than non- diabetic patients. Also, among diabetic patients the cost of health care is much higher in those with complications (Micro < Macro
-
Figure 6: Postsurgical photograpgh showing wide excision of
mass located in retromolar área.
Discussion
These type of tumours are very rare they comprise only 5% of
neoplasms and are seen in 0.4-2.6 for every 100,000 cases around
the world, the mucoepidermoid tumour affects parotid and minor
salivary glans in adults and is mostly seen in women and Young
adults, most tof the cases arise in the the parotid gland with this
ccase accounting for only 2-4% of the cases because it was seen in
the submandibular gland, this patient is currently under treatment
he was performed two sugeries for removal of ganglions locanated
in neck and in the submandbullary gland, highes prevalence for this
type of tumour is around the fifth decade of life and they can be
asymptomatic like in this case with the patient having few to no
symptoms. It has a puripotent cell origin and as we mention can
be classidief into three stages [3].
References
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
Figure1: Metabolic and Haemodynamic factors contributing to diabetic nephropathy
Risk factors for diabetic nephropathy
Risk factors for diabetic nephropathy include positive family history, hyperglycemia, hypertension, smoking and others.
Genetics and ethnicity
There is a concordance of nephropathy among twins having T1DM [17]. There is five times more chance to develop nephropathy in
diabetic siblings of patient with diabetes and nephropathy [18].
Beneficial effects of ACE inhibition on nephropathy showed there are high levels of ACE in patients with nephropathy and diabetes,
especially abnormal alleles of ACE gene carriers [19].
ESRD is more common in ethnic groups like African Americans, Mexican Americans and Native Americans [20].
Hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia and duration of diabetes is a strong risk factor of diabetic nephropathy [19]. In DCCT and other treatment trials showed lowering glucose levels reduces DN [23]. Diabetic nephropathy is not common in patients with HbA1c
-
Figure 6: Postsurgical photograpgh showing wide excision of
mass located in retromolar área.
Discussion
These type of tumours are very rare they comprise only 5% of
neoplasms and are seen in 0.4-2.6 for every 100,000 cases around
the world, the mucoepidermoid tumour affects parotid and minor
salivary glans in adults and is mostly seen in women and Young
adults, most tof the cases arise in the the parotid gland with this
ccase accounting for only 2-4% of the cases because it was seen in
the submandibular gland, this patient is currently under treatment
he was performed two sugeries for removal of ganglions locanated
in neck and in the submandbullary gland, highes prevalence for this
type of tumour is around the fifth decade of life and they can be
asymptomatic like in this case with the patient having few to no
symptoms. It has a puripotent cell origin and as we mention can
be classidief into three stages [3].
References
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
Microalbuminuria/ a predictor of clinical complications
Urine albumin ranging from 30 to 300mg in a 24-h urine sample is defined as Microalbuminuria [34, 36, 39].
Microalbuminuria (MA) and clinical complications
T1DM: It is an independent predictor of CV risks in patients above the age of 45 years [35].
T2DM: It is considered to be the harbinger and strongly associated with CV risks and mortality and morbidity [35].
Part of metabolic syndrome is also manifested by the levels of microalbuminuria in association with other components (metabolic
like lipids and BP, urate, body habitus and hs-CRP).
Association with SBP and CRP in causing endothelial dysfunction [35, 37]
Elevated SBP is associated with generalized endothelial dysfunction and leaky capillaries are associated with albumin
leak in the glomerulus and chronically inflamed endothelium.
Insulin Resistance
Central Obesity
Low levels of HDL Cholesterol
High Triglyceride levels
Systolic Hypertension
Lack of time dip in 24hr BP monitoring
Salt Sensitivity
Endothelial Dysfunction
Hypercoagulability
Impaired Fibrinolysis
Renal Dysfunction
Table 2: Showing the constellation of findings associated with microalbuminuria [35]
Study Title
Number
of Subjects
Study Population
Mean Follow-up
Intervention
Renal outcomes seen with albuminuria to
RAAS blockade IDNT
1,715
Type 2 Diabetes,
hypertension
4 years
Irbesartan,
Amlodipine or Placebo
50% reduction in
proteinuria in the first year;
decrease in renal risk
RENAAL
1,513
Type 2 Diabetes
3.4 years
Losartan (50 mg or 100 mg) or
placebo
50% reduction in
albuminuria in the first six months: decreased risk for ESRD by 45%
MARVAL
332
Type 2 Diabetes
6 months
Valsartan vs Amlodipine
Urinary AER at 24 weeks was reduced more with
Valsartan
Table 3: Depicting the clinical trials of Albuminuria and renal outcomes in T2DM [38]
Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108 3
-
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108 5
Study Title and design with interventions Gist of outcomes
Life study, Losartan studied in interventions Microalbuminuria is associated with hypertension and CV
risks
TOMS, Treatment of mild HT study, Enalapril Reduction in microalbuminuria along with BP control
PREVEND (Prevention of vascular and renal
end-stage disease)
Increase e-GFR with Microalbuminuria dure
to hyperfiltration and reduced GFR with macroalbuminuria
HOPE Increased CV risk and events with Microalbuminuria
Framingham Study Increased morbidity and mortality due to CV disease
Copenhagen City Heart Study Microalbuminuria associated with increased lipids and raised
BP with increased mortality
Table 4: Showing other studies related to microalbuminuria and CV risk not totally related to diabetes [38, 39]
Framingham Heart Study, HOPE, LIFE, PREVEND, HARVEST, HOOM, MONICA and Copenhagen city heart study emphasized the importance of control of BP and Microalbuminuria (some using RAAS blockade) in reducing the incidence of CV events and associated morbidity and mortality.
Microalbuminuria can be useful screening method in assessing CV risk in [35]
1) T2DM patients 2) >45 years older T1DM 3) Stage 2 Hypertension in elderly
Macroalbuminuria/a predictor of clinical complications
Macroalbuminuria predicts retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease.
Gall M et al, in their study showed 13.5% of T2DM had macroalbuminuria. Arterial hypertension was prevalent in 85% and ulcer of foot was seen in 25% [40].
Susan S et al, in a cross-sectional study involving 947 T2DM patients from year 1990 to 1993. DN was prevalent in 75% among macroalbuminuric patients. Among the patients who were suffering from DN, proliferative retinopathy was detected in 49%. The prevalence of neuropathy was also higher, 68% of patients with macroalbuminuria was having neuropathy. Cardiovascular disease was highly prevalent among those with macroalbuminuria, in 58% of the patients. The study showed an independent association between macroalbuminuria and occurrence of cardiovascular disease [41].
Diabetic nephropathy stages
First stage; Early, hyperfunction [42]
Characterized by hyperfunction
Structural changes; hyperplasia and hypertrophy of nephrons, kidney size increased
GFR increased 20-40%
Blood pressure within normal
Albumin excretion is increased, and by physical activity (provocation test) increased This stage is reversible by blood sugar control (such as insulin treatment)
Second stage; Glomerular lesion without clinical finding [42]
It develops over years. Structural changes; increased thickness of basement membrane GFR increased 20-30% or normal Blood pressure within normal Albumin excretion most of patients are within normal and exercise test abnormal after years This stage is reversible by blood sugar control.
-
Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108 6
6
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
Third Stage; Incipient stage [42]
Structural changes not well studied. GFR still increased Blood pressure increased Albumin excretion increased 25ug/min each year
Fourth stage; Overt diabetic nephropathy [42]
Characterized by pronounced proteinuria Structural changes; diffuse and nodular glomerulosclerosis and hyalinosis of arteriolar GFR decreased Albumin excretion /progressive macroproteinuria Blood pressure increased The antihypertensive treatment retards the progression, aim of BP (140/85-90).
Fifth stage; End stage renal failure [42]
Characterized by glomerular closure GFR or = 90ml/min
Stage 2 GFR 98-60ml/min
Stage 3 GFR 59-30ml/min
Stage 4 GFR 29-15ml/min
Stage 5 GFR
-
Alternatives to UAE
Semi-quantitative dipstick measure of Micral Test II
albuminuria
Qualitative dipstick test for proteinuria Combur M, Boehringer Manheim.
Quantitative measurement of protein in urine >430mg/l - 100% sensitivity and 93%
spot sample specificity
24 urine protein collection >500mg/24h-confirms diagnosis of
proteinuria
Table 7: Alternatives to UAE [50]
Prevent nephropathy; optimal glycaemic control, life style, blood pressure and lipids control
Early management of hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia and smoking in diabetic patients, is very important to prevent or delay the progression of DN [51].
Lifestyle measures include salt restriction, to stop smoking, exercise and maintaining an ideal weight [52].
Improvement of glycemic control slows the progression and the onset of microalbuminuria in both T1DM and T2DM. The HbA1c target should be < 6.5 % and the greatest benefit comes from early and better control [52].
Uncontrolled BP leads to progression of proteinuria and deterioration of renal function. The recommended target BP is below 130/80 according to NICE guidelines in both T1DM and T2DM. ACEIs or ARBs are the first drugs of choice and both can slow the progression of DN [52].
Target LDL-C < 100 mg/dl and < 70 mg/dl in diabetic patient and diabetic with CVD respectively. Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) revealed a great reduction of CVD and suggested that all DM patients should be on statins [51].
Management of microalbuminuria [53]
Management of microalbuminuria involves intensive glycaemic control which reduces the progression of the UAE in both T1DM &T2DM patients.
Blood pressure control reduces the progression and development of the albuminuria. Treatment with ACEI or ARB’s play a role by reducing the intraglomerular pressure and decreases the hyperfiltration, delays deterioration of the eGFR along with reduction of the BP. Doses are increased to maximum tolerated and approved dose with continuous monitoring of the creatinine and potassium level. Monitoring for UAE to assess treatment response and disease progression is required.
Other classes of antihypertensive therapy such as the Ca channel blockers, beta blockers and diuretics are used along with ACEI or ARBs for BP control.
Protein diet restriction delays the progression of albuminuria and delays the deterioration of eGFR.
Management of macroalbuminuria [53]
Management of macroscopic albuminuria involves optimization of glucose control, blood pressure, lipids and maintenance of ideal
body weight through therapeutic life style modification/ reinforcement together with drug adjustment if needed, to achieve
required target. Vaccination for HBV should be anticipated.
Monitoring for eGFR every 6 month for deterioration and complications of Chronic kidney disease complications when eGFR<
60ml/min/1.73m2; Hb, Urea, creatinine, potassium level, HCO3-, Ca2+, PO2-, se albumin, and at least yearly parathyroid hormone
level, vit D level.
Adjustment for drug dose is required to achieve; target glycaemia, blood pressure, lipid control, smoking cessation therapy when
indicated and avoidance of hypotension.
Counseling regarding diet: Advise salt restriction (
-
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
Avoid medications that may deteriorate renal function or stopping medications that are contraindicated according to the stage of renal failure.
Management of different stages of diabetic nephropathy/
Nephrologist referral
There should be a multidisciplinary approach to managing patients with diabetic nephropathy, focusing not only on slowing progression but also on modifying cardiovascular risk factors [52]. DCCT trial showed that intensive management of diabetes could delay microalbuminuria and slow the progression of microalbuminuria to proteinuria [54].
Stage 1; No proteinuria
Lifestyle Modification Dietary control of CHO and fats and salt restriction. Exercise and stop smoking Glycemic Control: Target HbA1c 1 g/24hr) are indications for referral
[62].
Prognosis of Diabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) causes considerable morbidity and mortality. In the US and Europe, DN is the major cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [63]. Both T1DM and T2DM develop ESRD, but larger proportions affected are those with T2DM, due to the increase in prevalence of T2DM. In T1DM with nephropathy, ESRD accounts for 59-66% of mortality. The
growing prevalence of ESRD in Europe seen in type 1 diabetics with proteinuria is 50%, while in Type 2 diabetics it is 3-11%, in a period of 10years following the start of proteinuria. The prediction of morbidity and mortality in DN is by Proteinuria. The mortality rate was small and constant in those diabetics who had no proteinuria while those diabetics with proteinuria had 40 times increase in death rate. In a study done in Germany, the chances of surviving for 5 years, in older type 2 diabetics was below 10%, and around 40% in young type1 diabetics [64, 65].
The prognosis of DN in both T1DM and T2DM has been improving due to the targeted approach, timely recognition of DN and managed appropriately according to the stage.
Conclusion
Diabetic nephropathy is one of the commonest microvascular complications of diabetes and is associated with other diabetes related microvascular diseases. It affects 20-40% of people with diabetes and is a leading cause of ESRD53. Interplay of multiple environmental and genetic factors determines its development and progression, the most important of these is uncontrolled hyperglycaemia and hypertension. The hallmark of DN is the presence of microalbuminuria in the early stages which progresses over a variable period to macroalbuminuria and deterioration of the renal function to ESRD requiring RRT.
Adequate control of blood glucose and hypertension are the mainstay of management in addition to life style interventions similar to those required to manage renal failure due to causes
[52].
Competing interests
The authors declared no competing interests regarding the publication of the paper.
Authors Contribution
Sumon Rahman Chowdhury contributed to the study conception and design, supervised the study, conducted data analysis and wrote the manuscript. Reza Haider Chy and Tasnuva Tanzil planned the study and prepared the first draft proposal. Alam Md. Sharif contributed to the data analysis, supervised the study and critically revised the manuscript.
References
1. Gilga J, Raoa A, Fogartya D (2013) UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Chapter 1 UK Renal Replacement Therapy Incidence in 2012: National and Centre-specific Analyses the UK Renal Registry 125: 1-27.
2. Gross J, Mirela J. de Azevedo, Sandra P. Silveiro, Luí s Henrique Canani, Maria Luiza Caramori et al. (2005) Diabetic Nephropathy: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment Diabetes Care January 28: 164-176.
3. Marshall S (2004) Recent advances in diabetic nephropathy. Postgrad Med J 80: 624-633.
4. Fraser D and Phillips A (2007) Diabetic nephropathy medicine 35: 503-506.
5. Holt et al. (2010) Diabetic Nephropathy Chap 37; 600-614. Textbook of Diabetes 2nd ed 2010 Wiley Blackwell.
6. Bilous R (2008) Microvascular disease: what does the UKPDS tell us about diabetic nephropathy? Diabet Med 25: 25-29.
7. Perkins B, Ficociello LH, Silva KH, Dianne M Finkelstein, James H Warram, et al. (2003) Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 348: 2285-2293.
Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108 8
8
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261067368_UK_Renal_Registry_16th_Annual_Report_Chapter_1_UK_Renal_Replacement_Therapy_Incidence_in_2012_National_and_Centre-_specific_Analyseshttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/261067368_UK_Renal_Registry_16th_Annual_Report_Chapter_1_UK_Renal_Replacement_Therapy_Incidence_in_2012_National_and_Centre-_specific_Analyseshttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/261067368_UK_Renal_Registry_16th_Annual_Report_Chapter_1_UK_Renal_Replacement_Therapy_Incidence_in_2012_National_and_Centre-_specific_Analyseshttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/261067368_UK_Renal_Registry_16th_Annual_Report_Chapter_1_UK_Renal_Replacement_Therapy_Incidence_in_2012_National_and_Centre-_specific_Analyseshttps://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/28/1/164https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/28/1/164https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/28/1/164https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/28/1/164https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743135/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743135/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1357303907001806https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1357303907001806https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18717975/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18717975/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12788992/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12788992/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12788992/
-
8. Retinopathy and Nephropathy in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Four Years after a Trial of Intensive Therapy the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/ Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. (2000) N Engl J Med 342: 381-389.
9. Zhang L, G Krzentowski, A Albert, P J Lefe bvre (2003) Factors predictive of nephropathy in DCCT Type 1 diabetic patients with good or poor metabolic control. Diabet Med 20: 580-585.
10. Foggensteiner L, Mulroy S, Firth J (2001) Management of Diabetic nephropathy. J R Soc Med 94: 210-217.
11. IDF Atlas 2019 [Online]. Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/material/20200302_133351_IDFATLAS 9e-final-web.pdf [Accessed: 05th November 2020].
12. Deshpande A, Harris M (2008) Epidemiology of Diabetes and Diabetes-Related Complications. Physical Therapy 88: 1254-1264.
13. Jorge L, Mirela J de Azevedo, Sandra P Silveiro, Luí s Henrique Canani, Maria Luiza Caramori, et al. (2005) Diabetic Nephropathy: Diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Diabetes Care28: 176-188.
14. Lerma EV, Rosner MH, Perazella MA (2018) CURRENT Diagnosis & Treatment: Nephrology & Hypertension, 2nd ed McGraw-Hill.
15. Singh AK, W.A. Mo, G Dunea, Jose A Arruda (1998) Effect of glycated proteins on the matrix of glomerular epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 802-810.
16. Soldatos G, Cooper M (2008) Diabetic nephropathy: Important pathophysiologic mechanisms. Diabetes research and clinical practice 825: 75-79.
17. Fioretto P, Steffes M, Barbosa J, Rich S, Miller M, et al. (1999) Is diabetic nephropathy inherited? Studies of glomerular structure in type 1 diabetic sibling pairs. Diabetes; 48:865-869.
18. Seaquist E, Goetz F, Rich S, Barbosa J (1989) Familial clustering of diabetic kidney disease: evidence for genetic susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med 320: 1161-1165.
19. Freire M, van Dijk D, Erman A, Boner G, Warram J, et al. (1998) DNA polymorphisms in the ACE gene, serum ACE activity and the risk of nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13: 2553-2558.
20. Timothy C, Capell P (2000) Diabetic Nephropathy. Clinical Diabetes 18.
21. Deferrari G, Repetto M, Calvi C, Ciabattoni M, Rossi C, et al. (1998) Diabetic nephropathy: from micro- to macroalbuminuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13: 11-15.
22. Di Landro D, Catalano C, Lambertini D, Bordin V, Fabbian F, et al. (1998) The effect of metabolic control on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13: 35-43.
23. The DCCT Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med 329: 977-986.
24. Makita Z, Radoff S, Rayfield E, Yang Z, Skolnik E, et al. (1991) Advanced glycosylation end products in patients with diabetic nephropathy. New Engl J Med 325: 836-842.
25. Velasquez M, Bhathena S, Striffler J, Thibault N, Scalbert E (1998) Role of angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibition in glucose metabolism and renal injury in diabetes. Metabolism 47: 7-11.
26. Thomas M, Rosengard- Barlund M, Mills V, Ronnback M, Stephen Thomas, et al. (2006) Serum lipids and the progression of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 29: 317-322.
27. Tolonen N, Forsblom C, Thorn L, Waden J, Rosengard - Barlund M, et al. (2008) Relationship between lipid profiles and kidney function in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 51: 12-20.
28. Gordin D, Hiilesmaa V, Fagerudd J, Ronnback M, Forsblom C, et al. (2007) FinnDiane Study Group. Pre-eclampsia but not pregnancy - induced hypertension is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetic women. Diabetologia 50: 516-522.
29. Lopes-Virella M, Carter R, Gilbert G, Klein R, Jaffa M, et al. (2008) Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Intervention and Complications Cohort Study Group. Risk factors related to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in the DCCT/EDIC cohort and their relationship with nephropathy and macrovascular complications. Diabetes Care 31: 2006-2012.
30. Schrijvers B, de Vriese A, Flyvbjerg A (2004) From hyperglycemia to diabetic kidney disease: the role of metabolic, hemodynamic and intracellular factors and growth factors/cytokines. Endocrine Rev 25: 971-1010.
31. Shultis W, Weil E, Looker H, Curtis J, Shlossman M, et al. (2007) Effect of periodontitis on overt nephropathy and end-stage renal disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care; 30: 306-311.
32. Hovind P, Hansen T, Tarnow L, Steffensen R, Flyvbjerg A, et al. (2005) Mannose-binding lectin as a predictor of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes: an inception cohort study. Diabetes 54: 1523-1527.
33. Jorsal A, Tarnow L, Flyvbjerg A, Parving H, Rossing P, et al. (2008) Plasma osteoprotegerin levels predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and deterioration of kidney function in type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy. Diabetologia 51: 2100-2107.
34. Holt G, Cockram C, Flyvbjerg A, Goldstein J (2010) Textbook of Diabetes 4th Edition, Wiley-Blackwell p 600.
35. Rodrigo T, Monica A, Donald G (2003) Microalbuminuria: Is it a valid predictor of cardiovascular risk?. Cleveland Clinic journal of Medicine 70: 255-261.
36. Garg P, Bakris L (20020 Microalbuminuria: marker of vascular dysfunction, risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Journal of Vascular Medicine 7: 35-43.
37. Aruna S, Sowndharya J, Monish RS (2020) Microalbuminuria: An increasingly recognized cardiovascular risk factor. Global Journal for Research Analysis 9: 1-3.
38. Basi S, Fesler P, Mimran A, Lewis B (2008) Microalbuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension. A marker, treatment target, or innocent bystander? Diabetes Care 31: 194-201.
39. Stehouwer D, Smulders M (2006) Microalbuminuria and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: Analysis of Potential Mechanisms, Journal of American Society of Nephrology 17: 2106-2111.
40. Gall M, Rossing, P Skøtt, P Damsbo, A Vaag, et al. (1991) Prevalence of micro- and macroalbuminuria, arterial hypertension, retinopathy and large vessel disease in European type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia 34: 655-661.
41. Susan S et al. (1999) Urinary Albumin Excretion as a Predictor of Diabetic Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Cardiovascular Disease in NIDDM. DIAIUTHS CARE 19: 1243-1247.
42. Mogensen C, Christenen K, Vittinghus E (1983) The stages in diabetic renal disease with emphasis on the stage of incipient diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes 32: 64-78.
43. Butt S, Hall P, Nurku S Diabetic Nephropathy. Cleveland clinic 2010, accessed on June 19th 2014 @ www. Cleveland clinic med ed.com/medical pubs/diabetic nephropathy.
44. American Diabetes Association (2004) Nephropathy in diabetes (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 27: 79-83.
45. Adler A, Stevens R, Manley S, Bilous R, Cull C, et al. (2003) Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64). Kidney Int 63: 225-232.
46. Stephenson J, Fuller J (1994) Microalbuminuria is not rare before 5 years of IDDM: EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study Group and the WHO Multi-national Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes Study Group. J Diabetes Complications 8: 166-173.
47. European Diabetes Policy Group (1999) A desktop guide to type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 16: 716-730.
48. Zelmanovitz T, Gross J, Oliveira J, Paggi A, Tatsch M, et al. (1997) The receiver operating characteristics curve in the evaluation of a random urine specimen as a screening test for diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 20: 516-519.
9. Mogensen C, Vestbo E, Poulsen P, Christiansen C, Damsgaard E, et al. (1995) Microalbuminuria and potential confounders: a review and some observations on variability of urinary albumin excretion. Diabetes Care 18: 572-581.
10. Gross J, de Azevedo M, Silveiro S, Canani L, Caramori M, et al. (2005)
Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108 9
9
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200002103420603https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200002103420603https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200002103420603https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200002103420603https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200002103420603https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12823241/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12823241/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12823241/http://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/material/20200302_133351_IDFATLAShttp://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/material/20200302_133351_IDFATLAShttp://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/material/20200302_133351_IDFATLAShttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18801858/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18801858/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15616252/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15616252/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15616252/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13688249_Effect_of_glycated_proteins_on_the_matrix_of_glomerular_epithelial_cellshttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/13688249_Effect_of_glycated_proteins_on_the_matrix_of_glomerular_epithelial_cellshttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/13688249_Effect_of_glycated_proteins_on_the_matrix_of_glomerular_epithelial_cellshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168822708004646https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168822708004646https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168822708004646https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10102705/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10102705/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10102705/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2710189/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2710189/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2710189/https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/13/10/2553/1838706https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/13/10/2553/1838706https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/13/10/2553/1838706https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/13/10/2553/1838706http://journal.diabetes.org/clinicaldiabetes/v18n12000/Pg7.htmhttp://journal.diabetes.org/clinicaldiabetes/v18n12000/Pg7.htmhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9870419/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9870419/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9870419/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9870424/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9870424/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9870424/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9870424/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8366922/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8366922/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8366922/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8366922/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1875967/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1875967/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1875967/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026049598903638https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026049598903638https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026049598903638https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/29/2/317https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/29/2/317https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/29/2/317https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-007-0858-yhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-007-0858-yhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-007-0858-yhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17216281/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17216281/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17216281/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17216281/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2551645/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2551645/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2551645/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2551645/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2551645/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2551645/https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article/25/6/971/2195017https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article/25/6/971/2195017https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article/25/6/971/2195017https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article/25/6/971/2195017https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17259499/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17259499/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17259499/https://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/54/5/1523https://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/54/5/1523https://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/54/5/1523https://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/54/5/1523https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-008-1123-8https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-008-1123-8https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-008-1123-8https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-008-1123-8https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12678217/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12678217/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12678217/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12083733/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12083733/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12083733/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5625336_Microalbuminuria_in_Type_2_Diabetes_and_Hypertension_A_marker_treatment_target_or_innocent_bystanderhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/5625336_Microalbuminuria_in_Type_2_Diabetes_and_Hypertension_A_marker_treatment_target_or_innocent_bystanderhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/5625336_Microalbuminuria_in_Type_2_Diabetes_and_Hypertension_A_marker_treatment_target_or_innocent_bystanderhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16825333/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16825333/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16825333/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00400995https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00400995https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00400995https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00400995https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6400670/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6400670/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6400670/http://www/https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/27/suppl_1/s79https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/27/suppl_1/s79https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12472787/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12472787/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12472787/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12472787/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8086653/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8086653/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8086653/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8086653/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00166.xhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00166.xhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9096972/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9096972/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9096972/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9096972/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497874/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497874/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497874/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497874/https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/28/1/164.full.pdfhttps://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/28/1/164.full.pdfhttps://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/28/1/164.full.pdf
-
49. Mogensen C, Vestbo E, Poulsen P, Christiansen C, Damsgaard E, et al. (1995) Microalbuminuria and potential confounders: a review and some observations on variability of urinary albumin excretion. Diabetes Care 18: 572-581.
50. Gross J, de Azevedo M, Silveiro S, Canani L, Caramori M, et al. (2005) Diabetic Nephropathy: Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment. Diabetes Care 8: 176-188.
51. American Diabetes Association (2005) Standard of medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 28: 4-36.
52. Wyllie C, Satchell C (2012) Diabetic nephropathy. Clinical Medicine. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians 12: 480-482.
53. American Diabetes Association (2014) Standards of medical care in diabetes 2014. Diabetes Care 37: 42-45.
54. Jorge L. Gross, Mirela J. de Azevedo, Sandra P. Silveiro, Luí s Henrique Canani, Maria Luiza Caramori (2005) Diabetic Nephropathy: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment. Diabetes Care 28: 164-176.
55. Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy: The Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study (2003) JAMA 290: 2159-2167.
56. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Bruce Neal, Laurent Billot et al. (2008) ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular out- comes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358: 2560-2572.
57. National Kidney Foundation KDOQI (2007) clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 49.
58. American Diabetes Association (2010) Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010. Diabetes Care 33: 11-61.
59. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Cardiovascular Disease in CKD. UK Renal Association 2010. (Access date: 05 May 2012).
60. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Assessment of the Potential Kidney Transplant Recipient. UK Renal Association 2011. (Access date: 05 May 2012)
61. American Diabetes Association (2008) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2008. Diabetes Care 31: 12-54.
62. Caring for Australians with renal insufficiency. Guidelines. Acceptance onto Dialysis. Timing of referral of chronic renal failure patients to nephrology services.@ http://www.kidney.org.au.cari/drafts.
63. Nephropathy in Diabetes. American Diabetes Association (2004) Diabetes Care 27: 79- 83.
64. Parving H, Hommel E (1989) Prognosis in diabetic nephropathy; BMJ 299: 230- 233.
65. Wolf G, Reitz E (2003) Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Prevention and Patient Management; JASN 14: 1396-1405.
Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108 10
9
Copyright: ©2020 Chowdhury SR and et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and
source are credited.
Citation: Chowdhury SR, Tanzil T, Chowdhury RH, Sharif AM (2020) Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comprehensive Review for Health Care Professionals. Int Jou Diab&Endocrinol: IJDE-108. DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497874/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497874/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497874/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497874/https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/28/1/164.full.pdfhttps://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/28/1/164.full.pdfhttps://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/28/1/164.full.pdfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15618112/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15618112/https://www.rcpjournals.org/content/clinmedicine/12/5/480https://www.rcpjournals.org/content/clinmedicine/12/5/480https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/497717_5https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/497717_5https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/497717_5https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/497717_5https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14570951/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14570951/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14570951/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14570951/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18539916/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18539916/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18539916/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18539916/https://www.kidney.org/sites/default/files/docs/diabetes_ajkd_febsuppl_07.pdfhttps://www.kidney.org/sites/default/files/docs/diabetes_ajkd_febsuppl_07.pdfhttps://www.kidney.org/sites/default/files/docs/diabetes_ajkd_febsuppl_07.pdfhttps://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/33/Supplement_1/S11https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/33/Supplement_1/S11https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18165335/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18165335/http://www.kidney.org.au.cari/draftshttps://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/27/suppl_1/s79https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/27/suppl_1/s79https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1836921/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1836921/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12707409/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12707409/