dhc-6 twin otter tailplane airfoil section testing in the ohio … · 2020. 8. 6. · of clmax...
TRANSCRIPT
NASA/CRm2000-209921/VOL1
DHC-6 Twin Otter Tailplane Airfoil Section
Testing in the Ohio State University7x10 Wind Tunnel
Dale Hiltner, Michael McKee, Karine La No4, and Gerald Gregorek
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
September 2000
The NASA STI Program Office... in Profile
Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to
the advancement of aeronautics and spacescience. The NASA Scientific and Technical
Information (STI) Program Office plays a key part
in helping NASA maintain this important role.
The NASA STI Program Office is operated by
Langley Research Center, the Lead Center forNASA's scientific and technical information. The
NASA STI Program Office provides access to the
NASA STI Database, the largest collection of
aeronautical and space science STI in the world.
The Program Office is also NASA's institutional
mechanism for disseminating the results of its
research and development activities. These results
are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report
Series, which includes the following report types:
TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of
completed research or a major significant
phase of research that present the results of
NASA programs and include extensive data
or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations
of significant scientific and technical data and
information deemed to be of continuing
reference value. NASA's counterpart of peer-
reviewed formal professional papers but
has less stringent limitations on manuscript
length and extent of graphic presentations.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific
and technical findings that are preliminary or
of specialized interest, e.g., quick release
reports, working papers, and bibliographiesthat contain minimal annotation. Does not
contain extensive analysis.
CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and
technical findings by NASA-sponsored
contractors and grantees.
CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected
papers from scientific and technical
conferences, symposia, seminars, or other
meetings sponsored or cosponsored byNASA.
SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific,
technical, or historical information from
NASA programs, projects, and missions,
often concerned with subjects having
substantial public interest.
TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English-
language translations of foreign scientific
and technical material pertinent to NASA'smission.
Specialized services that complement the STI
Program Office's diverse offerings include
creating custom thesauri, building customized
data bases, organizing and publishing research
results.., even providing videos.
For more information about the NASA STI
Program Office, see the following:
• Access the NASA STI Program Home Page
at http://www.sti.nasa.gov
• E-mail your question via the Internet to
• Fax your question to the NASA Access
Help Desk at (301) 621-0134
• Telephone the NASA Access Help Desk at(301) 621-0390
Write to:
NASA Access Help Desk
NASA Center for AeroSpace Information7121 Standard Drive
Hanover, MD 21076
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL1
DHC-6 Twin Otter Tailplane Airfoil Section
Testing in the Ohio State University7x10 Wind Tunnel
Dale Hiltner, Michael McKee, Karine La NoG and Gerald Gregorek
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Prepared under Grant NAG3--1574
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration
Glenn Research Center
September 2000
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the NASA Glenn Research Center Icing Branch for sponsoring this
wind tunnel test through the grant NAG3-1574 to the Ohio State University. We also would like to
acknowledge the project advocacy and support that the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center
provided throughout this research effort.
Trade names or manufacturers' names are used in this report for
identification only. This usage does not constitute an official
endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.
NASA Center for Aerospace Information7121 Standard Drive
Hanover, MD 21076Price Code: A06
Available from
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22100Price Code: A06
Table of Contents
List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iv
List of Symbols ............................................................................................................................... v
SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ vi
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1
2. EXPERIMENTAL FACILITY ............................................................................................. 3
3. MODEL DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 4
4. DATA ACQUISITION .......................................................................................................... 13
5. TEST PROCESS .................................................................................................................... 14
6. DATA REDUCTION ............................................................................................................. 15
7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................................ 18
7.1 Ice Shape Effects ....................................................................................................... 18
7.2 Velocity Effects .......................................................................................................... 19
7.3 Comparison of Surface Taps and Belt Taps ........................................................... 19
7.4 Repeatability .............................................................................................................. 20
7.5 Section 2 Comparison ............................................................................................... 21
7.6 Flow Visualization ..................................................................................................... 21
7.7 5-Hole Probe Results ................................................................................................. 22
8. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................... 40
Appendix A. Tap Locations ...................................................................................................... 41
Appendix B. Run Log ................................................................................................................ 47
Appendix C. Video Log ............................................................................................................. 49
Appendix D. Solid Wall Correction Calculations ................................................................... 55
Appendix E. Data Reduction Output File Formats ................................................................ 59
Appendix F. DHC-6 Twin Otter Tailplane Coefficient Data ................................................. 63
-) -) ,) ...NASAJCR--,.000-.099.1/VOL 1 m
List of Figures
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
1 NASA Glenn Research Center Icing Research Aircraft .......................................... 2
20SU Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Facility ..................................................................... 3
3 Section 1 (Baseline) and Section 2 Airfoil Sections ................................................... 5
4 Ice Shape Sections ......................................................................................................... 6
5 DHC-6 Tailplane Wind Tunnel Model Schematic .................................................... 7
6 Model Installation, View from Upstream .................................................................. 8
7 Baseline Installation, _=-26.6 ° (Wake Probe in Foreground) .................................... 9
8 LEWICE Ice Shape Installation (View from Upstream) ......................................... 109 Section 2 Installation .................................................................................................. 11
10 5-Hole Probe ....................................................................................................... 12
11 Pressure Distribution Example .............................................................................. 16
12 Data Reduction Correction Example ..................................................................... 17
13 Axis Systems and Sign Conventions. ................................................................... 22
14 Lift Characteristics, _e=0.0 ...................................................................................... 23
15 Hinge Moment Characteristics, _=0.0 ................................................................... 23
16 Lift Characteristics, Minimum Deflections .......................................................... 24
17 Lift Characteristics, Large Deflections .................................................................. 24
18 Hinge Moment Characteristics, Minimum Deflections ........................................ 25
19 Hinge Moment Characteristics, Large Deflections. ............................................. 25
20 Lift Curve and Hinge Moment Slopes .................................................................... 26
21 Elevator Lift Effectiveness (V=100 kts, Surface Taps). ........................................... 27
22 Elevator Hinge Moment Effectiveness (V=100 kts, Surface Taps) ........................ 27
23 Velocity Effects, Baseline, Lift Characteristics ..................................................... 28
24 Velocity Effects, LEWICE Ice Shape, Lift Characteristics .................................. 28
25 Velocity Effects, Baseline, Hinge Moment Characteristics ................................... 29
26 Velocity Effects, LEWICE Ice Shape, Hinge Moment Characteristics ............... 29
27 Tap Line Comparison, Baseline, Lift Characteristics ........................................... 30
28 Tap Line Comparison, LEWICE Ice Shape, Lift Characteristics ....................... 30
29 Tap Line Comparison, Baseline, Hinge Moment Characteristics ........................ 31
30 Tap Line Comparison, LEWICE Ice Shape, Hinge Moment
Characteristics. ............................................................................................................. 31
31 Baseline Repeatability, V=100 kts, Surface Taps .................................................. 32
32 LEWICE Ice Shape Repeatability, V=100 kts, Surface Taps .............................. 33
33 Section 2 Lift Characteristics Comparison ............................................................ 34
34 Section 2 Hinge Moment Comparison .................................................................... 34
35 Baseline Tuft Flow Visualization, AOA=-8.0 °, _e=0.0 ° .......................................... 35
36 S&C Ice Shape Tuft Flow Visualization, AOA=-8.0°,_=0.0 ° ............................... 36
37 Baseline Cp Distribution, AOA=-8.0 °, 5e=0.0 ° ........................................................ 37
38 S&C Ice Shape Cp Distribution, AOA=-8.0 °, 5e=0.0 ° ............................................ 37
39 5-Hole Probe Dynamic Pressure Comparison ........................................................ 38
40 5-Hole Probe Pressure Differential due to Angle of Attack ................................. 38
41 5-Hole Probe Pressure Differential due to Sideslip .............................................. 39
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 iv
List of Symbols
AOA,(x
C
CD
CDo
CH
CHc_
CH8
CL
CLmax
CLc_
CL_
CM,CMI/4
Cp
Ptotal
Pstatic
q,QRe
V
(x,AOA
Of+stall
+e
angle of attackchord
section drag coefficient
section drag coefficient at a = 0o
section hinge moment coefficient
sectmn hinge moment slope versus c_ at constant 6e
sectmn hinge moment slope with 8e at constant
section lift coefficient
peak section lift coefficient
section lift curve slope at constant 8e
section lift coefficient slope with 5e at constant (_
section moment about % chord
pressure coefficient
total pressure
static pressure
dynamic pressure
Reynolds Number
velocity
angle of attack
angle of attack at stall
elevator deflection
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 v
SUMMARY
Ice contaminated tailplane stall (ICTS) has been found to be responsible for 16 accidents
with 139 fatalities over the last three decades, and is suspected to have played a role in other
accidents and incidents. The need for fundamental research in this area has been recognized at three
international conferences sponsored by the FAA since 1991. In order to conduct such research, a
joining NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program was formed in 1994; the Ohio State University has
played an important role in this effort. The program employs icing tunnel testing, dry wind tunnel
testing, flight testing, and analysis using a six-degrees-of-freedom computer code tailored to this
problem. A central goal is to quantify the effect of tailplane icing on aircraft stability and control to
aid in the analysis of flight test procedures to identify aircraft susceptibility to ICTS. This report
contains the results of testing of a full scale 2D model of a tailplane section of NASA's Icing
Research Aircraft, with and without ice shapes, in an Ohio State wind tunnel in 1994. The results
have been integrated into a comprehensive database of aerodynamic coefficients and stability and
control derivatives that will permit detailed analysis of flight test results with the analytical
computer program. The testing encompassed a full range of angles of attack and elevator
deflections, as well as two velocities to evaluate Reynolds number effects. Lift, drag, pitching
moment, and hinge moment coefficients were obtained. In addition, instrumentation for use during
flight testing was verified to be effective, all components showing acceptable fidelity. Comparison
of clean and iced airfoil results show the ice shapes causing a significant decrease in the magnitude
of CLmax (from -1.3 to --0.64) and associated stall angle (from -18.6 ° to -8.2°). Furthermore, the
ice shapes caused an increase in hinge moment coefficient of approximately 0.02,the change being
markedly abrupt for one of the ice shapes. A noticeable effect of elevator deflection is that
magnitude of the stall angle is decreased for negative (upward) elevator deflections. All these result
are consistent with observed tailplane phenomena, and constitute an effective set of data for
comprehensive analysis of ICTS.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 vi
1. INTRODUCTION
This wind tunnel test is part of the NASA, FAA and The Ohio State University, Tailplane
Icing Program. The purpose of the program is to quantify the effect of tailplane icing on aircraft
stability and control to aid in the development of a flight test procedure that will identify aircraft
susceptible to tailplane icing. As a first step in this program, wind tunnel testing of the
2-Dimensional aerodynamics of the tailplane of the NASA Glenn Research Center Icing
Research Aircraft, a DeHavilland DHC-6 Twin Otter (Fig. 1) was undertaken. Pressure data from
surface taps and belt taps were acquired and integrated to obtain lift, drag, pitching moment, and
hinge moment coefficients. The belt taps consisted of precise holes punched into each tube of a
series of strip-a-tube belts wrapped around the airfoil section. Belt taps were included in the
testing as the aircraft will have belt taps installed during flight testing. Tests were conducted on
the clean, or uniced, airfoil and the airfoil with two representative ice shapes at a full range of
angle of attack (AOA), from large negative to beyond stall, and the full range of elevator
deflections. Reynolds number effects were obtained by testing at two velocities. As shown in
Figure 1, the Twin Otter tailplane is composed of two separate airfoil sections. Basic data for the
clean secondary airfoil section were also acquired. In addition, data were taken from a 5-hole
probe mounted on the airfoil leading edge. This data will be used to determine tailplane AOA
from similar probes in future flight testing.
The representative ice shapes were called S&C (for stability and control) and LEWICE
(because it was generated by the code of the same name). The S&C ice shape has been used in
several stability and control programs on the Twin Otter. This ice shape was determined using a
combination of in-flight photographs of icing on the Twin Otter's tailplane, and the FAA ADS-4
report "Engineering Summary of Airframe Icing Technical Data", by Bowden, et al. The
LEWICE ice shape was predicted using the LEWICE 1.3 computer program. (Specific input
conditions were: velocity = 120 kts, liquid water content = 0.5 g/m 3, median volumetric diameter
= 20_tm, icing time = 45 min, AOA = 0 °, total temperature = -4 ° C.) The ice shape was
determined in five equal time steps. Each step consisted of a 9 minute accretion time, a
redefining of the iced airfoil geometry, and a recalculation of the airflow over the new geometry.The 45 minute accretion time was chosen to be conservative while aligning with the FAA
requirement of demonstrating capability with 45 minute accretion time on an unprotected
surface.
To satisfy program objectives, this 2-D airfoil data will be used to generate separate
aircraft and tailplane stability and control derivatives. These data will allow the tailplane effects
and flow field environment during maneuvering flight to be explored by a flight path simulation
program presently under development. Maneuvers that indicate a tendency for tailplane stall will
be examined analytically refined by flight test. Data obtained from the belt taps and the 5-hole
probes will be used to quantify the tailplane aerodynamics during these flight test maneuvers.
NASA/CR--2000-209921 ]VOL 1 1
'_ _ L Section 2
_ Section 1
<I2._ Irii
Figure I NASA Glenn Research Center Icing Research Aircraft
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 2
2. EXPERIMENTAL FACILITY
The Aeronautical and Astronautical Research Laboratory Low-Speed Wind Tunnel
Facility (OSU LSWT) is a closed-loop circuit with a 7x10 ft. high-speed test section, and a
14x16 ft. low-speed test section. A 2000 Hp electric motor provides dynamic pressures up to
65 psf in the 7x10 ft. section. (See Fig. 2.) A sting balance mount allows models to be tested at
angle of attacks ranging from -15 to +45 degrees, while the rotating tunnel floor has a range of
-90 to +270 degrees.
-740 FT
2m
6 BLADE FAN - 20 FT.
I" 1I I
!
I16 x 14 FT
SCREEN TEST SECTIONI
! Ii'm l
1 IFLOW : :
' ' _'_"_171 I_T '(' ! x 10
' !TEST SECTION
L 15FT
154FT 6IN
lII._ BUILDING
WALLS
-I
Figure 20SU Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Facility
Tunnel speed is manually set based on average values obtained from two dedicated tunnel
pitot and static probe sets. A PC-class computer is used to control sting and mounting table
angles, and wake probe sweep, as well as data acquisition tasks. Up to 14 data channels can be
sampled. Signal conditioning and amplification are provided by individual rack mounted units.
Testing of 2-dimensional airfoils is conducted by installing a 7-ft. span model to fill the
height of the low speed test section. The model is attached to the floor mounting table, which is
then rotated to provide specific AOA's. Surface taps on the model are used to acquire pressure
distributions, which are integrated to obtain model forces and coefficients. To determine drag,
wake survey probes are installed down stream of the model. By sweeping these probes across the
test section, the complete model wake can be measured.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 3
3. MODEL DESCRIPTION
The two airfoil sections tested are shown in Figure 3. As is seen from the 2-view aircraft
drawing (Fig. 1), the Section 1 airfoil was a significant portion of the tailplane area. Drawings of
the two ice shapes are shown in Figure 4. Some minor smoothing of the lofted airfoil shape was
required; a 0.020 inch "bump" at the lower leading edge was removed, and a straight line contour
from the elevator main spar to the trailing edge was assumed.
The primary factors in the model design were to provide a smooth aerodynamic surface
while allowing flexibility in model configuration and low fabrication costs. A highly stiff design
was also desired, to maintain model shape under load. The chosen model design consisted of
airfoil sections machined in machineable plastic (also known as REN material), supported by
metal tubing spars and aluminum fibs. This allowed CNC machining to be used to fabricate the
airfoil shape with high accuracy.
A schematic of the model is shown in Figure 5. The 20 inch span Machineable Plastic
sections were supported by two internal metal tubing spars on each of the stabilizer and elevator
sections. Three fibs and two endplates structurally connected the spar tubes of the stabilizer to
the forward spar tube of the elevator. The ribs contained keyways for keys mounted on the
stabilizer spar tubes to provide stiffness under model moment loading. The ribs of the elevator
overlapped those of the stabilizer, to form a hinge around the forward elevator spar tube. End ribs
on the elevator provided attach points to the endplates, which were used for changing the
elevator deflection angle. The machineable plastic sections transmitted their loads to the ribs
through pins. The endplates contained rods to attach the model to the tunnel yaw table floor
supports, and to a ceiling pivot. The model was mounted to the yaw table such that the tablecenter of rotation was at 28% model chord.
Removable plug sections were used to create the two configurations tested. The stabilizer
section consisted of the baseline (or Section 1) section. An aft extension plug was then used to
create the Section 2 stabilizer section. The elevator section consisted of the Section 2 section
with plugs to create the baseline section. Figures 6 through 9 show the model as installed in thetunnel.
Tap locations were chosen to provide high resolution where pressure gradients were
large, and low resolution elsewhere to minimize the total number of taps. Taps were labeled
starting with #1 on the leading edge of the stabilizer and ending with #86 on the elevator trailing
edge. (This included taps for the baseline and Section 2 airfoils.) Odd numbered taps were
located on the suction side of the airfoil, with even numbers on the pressure side, except at the
boat-tail ends. The tap locations of the ice shapes replaced those on the nominal airfoil, which
was reflected in their numbering. The final tap location configurations are listed in Appendix A,
which also shows a graphic of their positions on the airfoil sections.
Surface taps were installed in-house prior to the completion of the section assembly. Taps
were located on a 12-inch airfoil section using a Bridgeport milling machine with digital distance
readout. Tap locations were determined relative to a coordinate system readily indicated using
available points on the section. Once the locations were marked along the section moldline,
0.0625-inch holes were drilled normal to the surface 0.5 inches below one edge. Mating holes
were then drilled vertically into the milled out end of the section. Stainless steel tubing was then
fitted to these mating holes and routed along the section end and through tubing passageway
holes. The tubing length was sized so at least 2 inches extended beyond the section. The tubing
was glued and sealed to the mating hole using plumbers paste. With the tubing completed, the
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL l 4
milled out end was filled and glued to a mating 8 inch section to complete the 20-inch section.
Strip-a-tube tubing was then attached to the stainless steel tubing and routed through the
passageways in each section to connect the surface taps to the scanivalve ports. The tubing length
was approximately 15 ft.
The belt was installed by first milling a slot into the pressure side of the stabilizer and
elevator. Double sided tape and epoxy were then used to secure the belts to the section. The free
ends of the belts were then routed through the slot and into the tubing passageways. Tap
locations were determined by measuring a surface distance along each side of the belt. A special
tap tool was then used to punch a hole in each tube and remove the excess material. Note that
each belt was continuous, connecting directly to the scanivalve, and only one tap per belt tube
was used. The two outer tubes of the full belt did not contain any taps, since experience has
shown that local flow accelerations over these outer tubes cause erroneous pressure
measurements.
The 5-Hole Probe is shown in Figure 10. As indicated in the drawing, the probe provides
six pressures. Ptotal and P_ta,ic are used to determine velocity. The difference between the upper
and lower static port pressures in the probe head provides an indication of AOA, and the
difference between left and right static port pressures provides an indication of sideslip angle.
The probe was attached to the leading edge of the model with a "glove" fixture that
wrapped around the leading edge. The alignment tabs of the probe fit into slots in the probe
mount on the glove. A set screw in this mount locked the probe in place. The glove was secured
to the model by a screw in each comer. The probe pressure tubing was routed through a hole
drilled through the model into the front pressure tubing passageway. The probe was mounted at
approximately 16 inches above the tunnel floor, at 75% of the lowest model span section. Note
that this probe installation duplicated the installation that will be used on the Twin Otter for
flight testing.
Section 1 (Baseline)
Section 2
Figure 3 Section 1 (Baseline) and Section 2 Airfoil Sections
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 5
LEWICE]ce$hope
1"4
O\
-1
-2
JJ
-3 i i i i i i I i r i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
-2 -1 0 1 2 3
X/C(Z)
S&CIce ShQpe
lITl ,llr IIII 1111 111, ,_II
Nv
O\>-
-I
-2
f
J
J i i i i i i i i _ i i J i k i
-1 0 1 2
x/c(z)
Figure 4 Ice Shape Sections
iiii
3
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 6
End Prate
(1 of 2)
Main Spar
_ Tube
I
[ Rib (1 of 3)
Elevator
Plug Section
(1 of 4)
Spar TubeI Installation
I (4/Rib)
II
Pin Hole
Elevator
Section
(1 of 4)
t II II II II
Pressure
Tubing
Passage
(3/Rib)
Elevator
HingeLocation
Stabilizor
Section
(1 of 4)
Elevator
Deflection
PositioningRib (1 of 2)
MountingTube
Figure 5 DHC-6 Tailplane Wind Tunnel Model Schematic
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 7
Figure 6 Model Installation, View from Upstream
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 8
Figure 7 Baseline Installation, 5e=-26.6 ° (Wake Probe in Foreground)
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 9
Figure 8 LEWICE Ice Shape Installation (View from Upstream)
NASA]CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 10
Figure 9 Section 2 Installation
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 11
NOTES
t.tV, Z$(NIL C0
],'mar,'4 P,'aI,p He.d ),',toFr',Dy_J T_ _ _gl_llPrOr' Jr¢_ '_ *_¢r_ NI Ir,cou_ll
_,4n Pipa_ "ll.4eF _ :Sdi_r/J_o_ _'popAll i[_<X,il=._ TT'.?i=, )_&ilr't pl,_,_ ]l'_l,a frO_,l.
?w
Praag Ppp$ rcop_ lp0p _ P|D£ Ivog
O[ 1AlL ik
"l_x',;. t;, J_" DP 33
L rr','lrgr'._ _1_ plim T_ [_ Plu B
Pva_ _d
NOTESl. PPcSarl_ L_4_, "1;_._ (_ _il f_01tlpl'p$ P_'Pk,
a.-b-. _,',,, lo IIr."l,'_ _ TUB[ _1 I_T_
3. g ll_airl i Proof-... l_",a,_¢r$_oc-I J. V_. JL'3'3.-EI4_' g k,_25 L_.
far f,r,r .P,_a_,'fm I]6,e_lia_
Figure lO 5-Hole Probe
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 12
4. DATA ACQUISITION
The scanivalves contained 48 ports and a single Statham 2.5 psi differential transducer,
vented to atmospheric pressure. The individual ports were accessed by mechanically rotating a
perforated ring to individually pass each port pressure to the transducer. This action was
controlled by computer, allowing up to 3 seconds between samples of each port. Four units were
used providing up to 192 pressure ports. To provide higher accuracy, tunnel total and static
pressures were applied to the first four ports of each unit. During data reduction, these pressures
were used to provide tunnel conditions for the pressure coefficients obtained from each
respective unit.The wake measurement system consisted of pressure probes mounted to a 16 ft. length of
aerodynamic tubing which spanned the test section. The tubing was supported by roller guides
located at each wall exterior, and one roller guide mounted on a vertical section of aerodynamic
tubing located at approximately 1/3 of the tunnel width. Three sets of one total and one static
pressure probes were attached to the aerodynamic tubing. These probes were 4 inches apart with32 inches between sets to allow some overlap during the 36-inch sweep across the test section.
An individual probe was used for each total and static pressure, allowing measurements to be
made at a constant tunnel cross-section location. Both total and static wake probe pressures were
measured by 2.5 psi differential transducers.Tunnel conditions were measured using dedicated 2.0 psi differential transducers for pitot
pressures, while 0.5 psi differential transducers were used for the static pressures. All differential
transducers were vented to the atmosphere, with atmospheric pressure determined from a
sensitive altimeter.
All transducers were calibrated using a manually operated water manometer. Calibrations
of the scanivalve transducers over both positive and negative pressure ranges were linear within
0.32% full scale, with a standard deviation within 0.15%. Repeatability of the calibration slopes
was within 0.5% full scale. The wake probe transducers were linear within 0.1% with standard
deviation less than 0.03%. For the tunnel transducers, linearity was within 0.1% and standard
deviation within 0.03%. Similarly, tunnel static transducers were calibrated to 0.2% and 0.12%,
respectively.Power for all transducers was supplied by signal conditioners mounted in the control
room. Amplifier banks mounted in the control room amplified the transducer outputs to the
proper voltage for the 14 channel A/D converter. The digital outputs were then fed to a 386 classPC. This PC contained all data gathering and data reduction programming, with only tunnel
airspeed being manually controlled. Angle of attack positioning, operation of the scanivalves,
operation of the wake probe sweep, and recording of all raw data was performed by the run
program. During an AOA sweep, the run program displayed current tunnel conditions and model
position, as well as the value of each active A/D channel.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 13
5. TEST PROCESS
Appendix B contains a Run Log for the test. (Note that runs prior to run 10 did not
generate valid pressure data due to a malfunctioning scanivalve.) Note that repeatability runs of
the baseline configuration at 100 kts were taken at Be=0.0 °, 14.2 ° and -26.6 °. Also, the last data
point of each run was taken at AOA=0.0, as a run repeatability check. Only a few runs weretaken with the Section 2 configuration, due to test time limitations.
The daily test procedure consisted of first adjusting all signal conditioners and amplifiers
to their proper values. This compensated for the small drift associated with the particular
electronics used. The barometric pressure in the "balance room" was noted each morning. (All
differential transducers were vented to the "balance room" atmosphere.) After the tunnel
inspection was completed, the run software was started.
The run software was initially set up for the model characteristics prior to any testing.
This included model reference dimensions, as well as any transducer calibrations. The "balance
room" pressure and the tunnel temperature were entered each morning. Other specific items
entered prior to each run included; run number, run description, the specific set of pressure taps
in use, elevator deflection angle, the file name into which the raw data would be saved, status of
wake probe usage, and specific AOAs desired during the run. Once these were set, a wind off
tare was taken. This numerically zeroed all the pressure transducers to ambient conditions, within10 -3 psid.
With the tares completed, the run program was started which positioned the model to the
first AOA of the sweep. The tunnel fan was then started and manually set to a specific RPM,
which resulted in the desired dynamic pressure, as displayed by the run program. When this
dynamic pressure was stabilized, the AOA sweep mode was engaged. The run program then
positioned the model and took data for all desired AOA points. A typical AOA sweep of
10 points took approximately 30 minutes to complete. A wake probe sweep, if run, occurred after
pressure tap data were taken at each AOA. This sweep added an extra 2 minutes to the time to
take data at each AOA. Because of this, only a limited number of wake probe sweeps wereaccomplished.
Note that once the RPM was set, it was not changed during a run. Large blockage at the
higher AOAs caused a reduction in the tunnel velocity and Reynolds Number. Nominally this
reduction was on the order of 10 kts (Aq=6 psf and ARe=0.5xl06), during the 100 kts runs. For
the runs into the AOA=20 ° range, the reduction was on the order of 20 kts (Aq=l 1 psf and
ARe=0.8xl06). For the 60 kts runs, the reduction was typically less than 10 kts (Aq=3.5 psf and
2uRe=0.45x 106), with 15 kts (Aq=4.5 psf and _uRe---0.55x 10 6) being an extreme. This reduction in
velocity was allowed because the time required to manually set the velocity at each AOA point
would have been excessive. Also, the incremental velocity between each 60 and 100 kts run was
kept within a reasonable range, so any Reynolds number effects would be apparent.
With the AOA sweep completed, any desired post run note was entered into the run
program, and the raw data were saved to the hard disc. The raw data were the final result
generated by the run program. The raw data file included the output voltages of all transducers,
and the tap location and calibration data. This method of data storage allowed a run to be
modified post-test if errors in the setup were discovered after testing was completed.
NASA/CR---2000-209921/VOL 1 14
Limited tuft flow visualization was also performed. A single row of tufts was installed in
the center of the upper and lower model sections. These tufts were briefly video taped at each
AOA during most of the AOA sweeps. Correlation to the specific test condition was
accomplished by logging the time of each recording. Appendix C contains the timing log for the
video. (Note that runs 01 through 07 were applicable for the tuft video.) Additionally, some runs
were made with more complete tufting of the model to check for 3-Dimensional effects. Pictures
and video were taken of most of these runs. (These runs are indicated as Flow Viz runs in the
Run Log of Appendix B.)
6. DATA REDUCTION
Coefficient data were obtained by integrating the pressure coefficient distributions of the
stabilizer and elevator separately. A typical pressure distribution is shown in Figure 11. This was
accomplished by applying the averaged pressure of adjacent taps to the area between them. When
summed, these values gave coefficients defined relative to the local element coordinate system.
These local coefficients were then converted to a lift and drag contribution by the appropriate
axis transformation. Moment was obtained similarly, using moment arms of the distance from a
reference center to the center location of each integration area.
The solid wall correction factors discussed below use drag coefficient as a primary
parameter. Due to the limited amount of wake data obtained during the test, all drag coefficient
values were estimated from pressure drag coefficients. A Coo bias coefficient was determined by
comparing wake drag coefficients to pressure drag coefficients at AOA=0 °, and 5e=0 °, for each
Section and ice shape configuration tested. These Coo coefficients were then applied to all
pressure drag coefficients obtained with the same Section and ice shape configuration. The
resulting drag coefficient values were judged to be well within required tolerances for obtaining
accurate solid wall corrected coefficients.
With all coefficients thus obtained, solid wall corrections were then applied. The
formulas used to obtain the corrected data are shown in Appendix D. An example of typical
magnitudes of the corrections is given in Figure 12, which shows corrected and uncorrected data
for a baseline run. Note that a buoyancy term was not included in the corrections, which is used
in Ref. D1 as a CD correction. Ref. D1 implies that a buoyancy correction is valid only for large
elements of an aircraft configuration, and is not significant for airfoils. Sample calculations
verified this implication.
In addition to the corrected coefficient data, the data reduction program also calculated
other important data. Five output files were generated containing uncorrected, corrected, wake
drag, 5-hole probe pressure, and wall static pressure coefficients. Appendix E contains a
description of the file name and data structure conventions of the output files.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 15
DHC-6 Taitplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataRun 55, AOA=-8.0, Uncorrected Data
c-
£.J,u
¢0©
LD
O3
L_th
LD
-5.2
-2.8
-2.4
-2.0
-1.6
-1.2
-0.8
-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2-0.1
: : : : : : i.III !. • S_.ab.......... i ........ i ....... i........ e......... _ ....... i--- _............0 Sta_. Pres_• Elev. :Suc t,
.......... , ......... i........ i ....... _---1 • -i.--:-. .,. : ..p .... : ..i .... ]. [] Eiev. Pres.: • ......... O sto_.
.... : [ : :..... [ -4 ,- ]....... [ ........ _....... ] .... i----] --t--- [....... [ ........ ................... .. --
-: : : : : O: r-I: : :
: 9 ...... "
........ ,-.. ....... ..., ........ _ 1.... . L...[... _ ....... _. .; .... I --: .... i .1: .... I.. :.... J 1.: ....
i : : : i i: : To , 0-.4 .... i--, .................. _ ......... i........ f......... i ....... :--
q ,..... : -, .... :-- , .... :.... ,.... : ........ :...4-..:.-_- ...... ].I. ._...: ........ : ...... :....
: 0 O: ill •
' : .... --: ........ i ........ i........ iu n!-n_n- n..... : - i - .... n.... :.... i.... ;---_ .... i .... _...; ..q
: : ..6.. '_ : D _ _ [] mid u]_.....i ,:-:,..... _6o< : ......i........! ........i........! ...._
; ; I-
i i i i i i i i i i ; :
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1
X/C ( Elevator shifted by 0.1 )
Figure 11 Pressure Distribution Example
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 16
_J
c.)
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataRun 55, Uncorrected/Corrected Comparison
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
-0.8
-1.2
-20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4- 8 12 16 20
AOA (deg)
'C"o
*6>
i,i
"1-
(_)
0.16
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.00
-0,04
-0.08
< .... . ' ' ' I ' I
... _.1 ......l......l..i.... i.l . l .-_-_°_'°"°
..........__,< ...................................i.................
!!!!-20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 20
AOA (deg)
Figure 12 Data Reduction Correction Example
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 17
7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The purpose of this test was to quantify the effects of ice shapes on the Twin Otter
Tailplane 2-dimensional aerodynamics. This quantification was sought relative to the tailplane
stall phenomenon. The two most important phenomena were therefore lift and hinge moment.
These are discussed in the following section. Appendix F contains a complete data presentation
of all test results of CL, CD, CM, and CH.
All data are presented with the tailplane as installed on the aircraft, using an aircraft
reference system. Therefore, when the airfoil is generating lift relative to the airfoil reference
system, this corresponds to negative lift, or positive tailplane down force, in the aircraft reference
system. Other sign conventions are AOA positive with the stabilizer leading edge up, moment
and hinge moment positive when nose up, and elevator deflection positive with trailing edge
down (causing positive lift). Figure 13 presents a schematic describing the axis system and signconventions.
7.1 Ice Shape Effects
The nominal lift characteristics with zero elevator deflection are shown in Figure 14.
(Note that the CL at AOA=-21 ° of the baseline configuration was judged to be in error, and
indicative of the largely separated flow at this AOA. A more appropriate CL value was estimated
to be CL=-1.22, based on the characteristics of the 60 kts data.) Here the significant reduction in
negative CLmax and decrease in negative AOA at stall due to the ice shapes is clearly seen.
Specifically, negative CLma× is reduced from CLmax=-l.3 for the baseline airfoil, to CLmax=-0.64
for the S&C ice shape, and to CLmax=-0.60 for the LEWICE ice shape. Negative AOA at stall is
decreased from the baseline's AOA=-18.6 ° to approximately AOA=-8.2 ° for either ice shape.
Nominal hinge moment characteristics are shown in Figure 15. These clearly show the ice shapes
causing an approximate ACH=0.02 increase at stall. Note, for the LEWICE ice shape, the
transition is not as abrupt as for the S&C ice shape.
The effects of the ice shapes on elevator effectiveness are shown in Figures 16 through
22. (Only the LEWICE ice shape data is shown, as there is little difference in the results with
either ice shape.) Figure 20 shows that, in the low AOA linear range used to determine the lift
curve slopes, the uniced and LEWICE airfoils have similar trends, with both slopes peaking at
8e=10 °. A noticeable effect of elevator deflection is that negative AOA at stall is decreased for
negative elevator deflections and increased for positive tail deflections. For LEWICE data
(Fig. 16) at _Se=-10°, CLm_x=-0.85 at AOA=-6.25 °, while at 5e=+10 °, CLmax=-0.33 at AOA=-10.2 °.
These trends continue when the negative deflection is increased to 5e=-20 ° resulting in
CLmax=-l.21 at AOA=-4.32 ° (Fig. 17). However, increasing positive deflections result in a
smaller increment for CLmax, of ACL=-0.18 and no change in AOA at stall (Fig. 17). Figure 21
shows that the elevator lift effectiveness is extremely low beyond _=-20 °. This indicates that the
elevator is saturated, that is, in fully separated flow, at the larger negative deflections.
These stall AOA and effects of flow separation are also seen in the hinge moment, shown
in Figures 18 through 20. There is only a small change in CH due to the LEWICE ice shape
between _5_=+10 ° and _5e=+14.2 °. However, for both deflections there is a significant shift in CH
starting at AOA=-8 °. This shift is significantly trailing edge down, of roughly ACH=+0.040, and
is close to the clean 5e=0.0 ° values at AOA=-12 °. The effect of ice on the 8_=-10 ° data shows
only a small increase in CH, at a post stall AOA. However, both the iced and uniced data show a
negative steepening of the CH curve at this deflection. At _ie=-20 ° there is a significant ACH=0.02
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 18
increase,startingat anegativeAOA belowstall of AOA=-2.3°. This results in the sharp negative
increase in CH6 for deflections between _Se=-10 ° and 8e=-20 ° shown in Figure 22. For other
deflections, the CH_ for the LEWICE ice shape shows similar trends to that for the uniced airfoil.
Figure 20 shows that, while CH,_ of the baseline airfoil is negative and relatively constant, CH,_ for
the LEWICE ice shape shows a trend of negatively increasing with increasing positive or
negative elevator deflection.
These results match well with observed tailplane stall phenomena. During approach, the
elevator would most likely be at a negative deflection. Tailplane stall could more readily occur,
since the AOA at which stall would occur would be lowered. Once the stall occurred the AOA
would become more negative due to the nose down pitching dynamics. With a negative CHc,, the
trailing edge down (positive) hinge moment would increase, keeping the elevator in a trailing
edge down position. The elevator would continue its trailing edge down tendency, until it reached
a position limit or the AOA stabilized. Also, in general, the trend in CH6 is decreasing with
increasing positive tail deflection. This would support the typically observed "stick force
lightening" phenomenon. However, the trend in CH6 at the maximum positive tail deflections and
largest negative AOA is significantly increasing (Fig. 22). This suggests that any "stick force
lightening" would be dependent on the specific AOA and deflection of the maneuvering aircraft.
7.2 Velocity Effects
Representative velocity effects are shown in Figures 23 through 26, for the baseline and
LEWlCE configurations. Figure 23 indicates that for _5_=0.0 ° there is a AAOA=2 ° decrease in
negative AOA at stall at 60 kts (Re=2.7xl06) compared to the 100 kts (Re=4.8xl06) data. There
is also an earlier stall break at the positive AOAs for the +Se case. In general, there is an increase
in negative lift at the higher speed. At 5_=-20 ° there is a significant decrease in negative CL at
about AOA=-4.0 °, which is most likely caused by the largely separated flow of this deflection.
These results are consistent with typical Reynolds number effects.
Figure 25 shows an indication of the earlier stall break for the Be=0.0 ° case in the hinge
moment data. Some slight increase in hinge moment is seen for the lower speed, but this is
nominally in the repeatability range and so is not considered to be significant.
The LEWICE ice shape data of Figures 24 and 26 show little differences due to the speed
variation. Except for some noticeable larger differences at the most positive AOA, such
differences that are seen are within nominal repeatability.
7.3 Comparison of Surface Taps and Belt Taps
In general the agreement between the surface tap and belt tap results can be qualified as
good. However, significant differences seem to occur at conditions of largely separated flow.
Figures 27 and 28 show lift characteristics for the baseline and LEWICE cases. Agreement is
good for the baseline data, until near stall at 8_=0.0 °, and at the low negative AOAs for _e=-20 °.
In the later case, the shift is roughly ACE=0.2, which is relatively large. (Note, however, from
Appendix F, Figs. F.27 and F.28, that the drag at low AOA seems to be erroneously large.
Applying solid wall corrections using the drag from the surface taps reduces this shift to
ACE=0.1, which is still significantly large.) Also, a reduction in negative AOA at stall of about
AAOA=2 ° is seen at _Se=0° and negative 5_s. The LEWlCE ice shape data shows a lowering of
negative CL of about ACE=0.06 at 5_=-20 °, and a slight increase in negative CL of ACE=-0.05 post
stall for _=0 °. Note that the stall AOAs agree.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 19
The hinge momentdata of Figures29 and 30 show someshifts in CH at 5e=0.0° and_5e=-20° for the baselinecase.The ACH=0.04 shift with _ie=-20 ° near AOA=-4.0 ° is large,
however, agreement is good near the stall at roughly AOA=-14 °. The constant shift of the
baseline data with _=0 ° of about ACH=0.015 is significant, but the trends are more closely
followed. There is no indication of a lowering of the negative AOA at stall for the belt data. The
LEWICE data follows the trends of the baseline data, but the differences are of much smaller
magnitude.
Overall, as tested, the belt is considered to be a good data source for predicting trends.
However, care must be taken in using the belt results. The trend of the better agreement of the ice
shape data is encouraging. However, for the clean airfoil, the lowering of the negative stall AOA
and the shift in CH and negative 8_ must be taken into account. Also, there are noticeable belt
effects starting at approximately AOA=-4 ° with 8_=-20 ° for both the iced and uniced airfoils.
These effects indicate that the belt data is more suspect in areas of large flow separation, possibly
due to span-wise flow over the belt. As such span-wise flows are more likely to occur on the
Twin Otter tailplane in flight, the belt data could be more significantly effected. Therefore, the
flight test data obtained from the belt will need to be carefully evaluated.
7.4 Repeatability
In order to quantify repeatability of the coefficient data, repeat runs were made at 100 kts
and Be=0.0 °, _5e=-26.6 °, and 5_=14.2 °. Except for a few AOAs where there is significant
separation, the repeatability is good. Figures 31 and 32 show repeatability comparisons for the
baseline and LEWlCE ice shape.
From these figures it is seen that nominal differences in CL for the baseline case using
surface taps are within ACL=+/-0.03 and ACH=+/-0.007. At some extremes for the _5_=-26.6 ° data,
the differences are within ACL=+/-0.1 and ACH=+/-0.03. The LEWICE ice shape data agreement
using surface taps was better than that for the baseline case. Nominal differences in CL are within
ACL=+/-0.02 with extremes to ACL=+/-0.04. Nominal differences in CH repeatability are within
ACH=+/-0.007. All are good values.
In order to quantify more precisely these levels of repeatability, standard deviation values
were calculated for all corrected coefficients obtained with surface taps at each target AOA. (No
correction to any coefficient was made for shifts in AOA away from the target values.) Nominal
standard deviation for CL was judged to be within CL=0.015. This nominal value neglected about
10% of the data points, which was typical for the assessment of all nominal values. The largest
standard deviation value was CL=0.18, for the baseline airfoil at target AOA= 12.0 ° and 8_= 14.2 °.
Nominal standard deviation for CD was Co=0.05, with extremes to CD=0.10. Both CM and CH
had nominal standard deviations of 0.003, with extremes to CM=0.03, and CH=0.21 at target
AOA=12.0 ° and _5e=14.2 ° for the baseline airfoil. Applying the 2-sigma level of uncertainty
resulted in repeatability within ACL=+/-0.03, ACD=+/-0.01, ACM=+/-0.006, and ACH=+/-0.006.
These are considered to be good overall repeatability levels, which also agree with the above
assessment obtained by viewing the repeatability plots.
Repeatability for the baseline configuration using belt taps showed similar nominal
values. However, at the extremes, the differences in coefficient values could be up to 3 times
larger than those for the surface data. Repeatability of the LEWICE data using belt taps was the
same as that of the surface tap data.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 20
Also, note that, due to model twist under load, it is judged that AOA is measuredtowithin AAOA=+/-0.5 °. This size of error, along with the size of coefficient errors defined above,
results in the symbol size of the plots of Appendix F representing the approximate nominal error
range of the data.
7.5 Section 2 Comparison
The Section 2 airfoil was tested at 60 kts with _Se=0.0°, 14.2 °, and -20.0 °. The 5-Hole
probe was not installed during this testing, as it had been removed earlier with no change in the
baseline results. (No other deflections or ice shapes were tested due to time limitations.) Lift and
hinge moment comparison plots are shown in Figures 33 and 34.
The most distinctive characteristics of the Section 2 airfoil, compared to the baseline, are
its higher CLmax=-l.36, approximately AAOA=2.0 ° lower negative AOA at stall, and the
sharpness of the stall break. Section 2 has a longer chord for the main element, significantly
smaller gap, and no extension of the elevator leading edge. All of these configuration differences
contribute to this higher CLma×. The hinge moment behaves as expected, with a larger CHs, caused
by the lack of the moment balancing elevator extension of the baseline elevator.
7.6 Flow Visualization
Additional tufts were added to the model at run 60 to provide more complete flow
visualization. Overall, 2-Dimensional flow quality can be characterized as good for all airfoil
configurations. For the baseline with 5e=0.0 ° the tufts showed some spanwise flow towards
model centerline near the tunnel floor and ceiling due to the tunnel boundary layer interference.
Additionally, a slight flow angle away from the ribs towards the centerline of the tapped airfoil
sections was seen. This could be described as a "rib interference" phenomenon. Also, in general,
the flow over the belt section appeared to separate later than the surface tap section. The most
significant flow field phenomenon observed with 8e=-26.6 ° was separated flow on the elevator at
all AOAs tested. The S&C ice shape with 5e=0.0 ° and 8_=-26.6 ° showed little 3-Dimensional
flow effects. The "rib interference" phenomenon was not as apparent, and separation of the
elevator occurred along a constant chordline.
Comparing the observed flowfield to the surface to belt comparisons of c) above, shows
that most of the flowfield phenomena, while visible, did not cause significant differences in
coefficients. Baseline coefficient data showed significant differences only when the flowfield
was completely separated. This was most noticeable at 8e=-26.6 ° and post stall.
Figures 35 and 36 show examples of tuft photographs for the baseline and S&C ice shape
at AOA=-8.0 ° and V--100 kts with _e=0.0 °. The corresponding Cp distributions are shown in
Figures 37 and 38. The figures show clearly the large amount of separation that occurs with the
ice shapes at low AOA. In general, they also show the constant chord line of the flow separation
across the span, except near the tunnel floor and ceiling where boundary layer interference has an
influence on the flow. The separation line of the ice shape is indicated in the Cp distribution plot
to be at approximately 40% chord, which has fully enveloped the tufts at approximately 45%
chord. (Note that the line of tufts near the ceiling is judged to be influenced by the ceiling
boundary layer interference, and so is not indicative of the actual 2-D airfoil stall location.) The
characteristic bluntness of the Cp distribution caused by the ice shape is clearly evident. The
baseline airfoil has attached flow over most of its chord, with only beginnings of separation
indicated near the trailing edge. This is indicated in the Figure 37 by the classic shape of the Cp
distribution, except where the start of separation causes a flattening of the upper surface
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 21
pressuresstartingat approximately80%chord. Overall, the tuff flow visualizationshowswelldefined2-D flow andgoodagreementwith theCpdistributions.
7.75-Hole Probe Results
Plots of the 5-Hole probe data from the 100 kts baseline run are shown in Figures 39
through 41. In Figure 39, the dynamic pressure indication of the probe is shown to be lower than
tunnel conditions by approximately 6 to 10 kts. (Note, the indicated runs were within +/-10 kts of
the target of 100 kts.) Also, there is a tendency for lower indications of dynamic pressure at the
larger positive and negative AOAs tested. The AOA ports show good fidelity in indicating AOA
(Fig. 40). Assuming a reasonably linear probe calibration, the reduction in upwash angle that
occurs when the iced airfoil is stalled is clearly seen. The sideslip ports show a small constant
bias in Figure 41, which may be due to a slight tunnel angularity, or the probe itself.
The figures also indicate differences in the probe response with airfoil configuration. This
suggests that each airfoil configuration will need its own probe calibration. However, the
magnitude of the noted differences on the probe output values is currently not known, as a probe
calibration has not been accomplished. An assessment of all aspects of the data fidelity of the
probe will be accomplished when the probe calibration is available.
/1+ Pitching
Moment
J
+ Angle-of-Attack
+ Lift
1'
- Lift
+ ElevatorDeflection
+ HingeMoment
( + Downforce)
Figure 13 Axis Systems and Sign Conventions
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 22
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataBaselTne V=7 O0 kts Surface Taps
d
c
°__
°_
oQ)
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
-0.8
-1 .2
.....i....... ! ..... ! ....... i....... i.......... i......... i ..... i....... :........ ! ....... :--: : : : : : i ! i _ ! i
' £
---e--- Baseline
-- -._.--- S&C Ice ShapeF i i i - --'9--- LEWICE Ice Shape. . @ .... : ..... _ ...... :..... : ........ :........
: ; i i i i
-20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16
Angle-of-Attack (deg)
Figure 14 Lift Characteristics, _e=0o0
2O
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataBaseline V=100 kts Surface Taps
:E
c-
q3
(.P.m
q_o
q_Eo
©
c
T
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1-24 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12
Angle-of-Attoc k (deg)
Figure 15 Hinge Moment Characteristics, 5e=0.0
:..... :.. , .. .... ,.... _ .,. ...... : ..... ...- .... ,. . + Baseline
: ---A--- S&:C Ice Shape
.......... : ......... i .... : ..... i .--, ........ ,..... 9--- LEWlCE Ice Shape •
i ....... i ....... _-___.l .... !..... _ : I :
.iii ii ii iiii
i i : i : i i _ i i _
16 20
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 23
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataV=I O0 kts Surface Taps
1.6 _ _ _ ! _ _ _ !
' , , V1 .2 : : : _-:---
d 0.4
8 o.o
_) -0.4
-0.8
:_3 .. v ._. i ...............-1.2 - s°d°
-2.0 : : : ; i ; ; T T-24 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 20
Angle-of-Attack (deg)
Figure 16 Lift Characteristics, Minimum Deflections
d
t'-{1)
C)
tZ-
G_
O
¢._)
.-2
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataV=I O0 kts Surface Taps
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
-0.8
-1.2
-1.6
-2.0-24
: : : : ! i , _'-_2...... :-__
: : i i !, i !
'- ......:-]-:......i;,,'"f-li-;DJ........_....!..........' : ....I....!t"-_'-"s '' ..... 7.J>_K//T.-:- t' :J' : ':
i : • : : : ii .... 2 " ';
.........I..... ;........ ...............i.... , !" ._._ ; ..i_<.._
: _ : '*_tt; 2_" --,-- Bo,o,_oo_:oo>v , ---i--- Baseline 8e=-
-.i .11 q'--i ..... i ..... ---Iv--- Baseline6e=l 4.2
i, ,,._..._i _ LEWlCE 6e= 0---_--- LEWlCE 6e= -, \
•.:........i-'_ ---_--- ,_,c__=_,
-20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 20
Angle-of-Attac k (deg)
Figure 17 Lift Characteristics, Large Deflections
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 24
DHC-6Tailelane OSU 7XlOWTndTunne_Data
V=lO0 kts Surface Taps
0.2
I
0
c- 0.1
c;
©0
0.0
(D
E0
© 0.1O_u
I
0.224 -20 -1 6 -12 8 4 0 4 8 " 2 " 6 20
Ldeg#Angle of-Attack r
Figure 18 Hinge Moment Characteristics, Minimum Deflections
0.2
DHC-6Tailplane OSU 7X!OW[ndTunnel DataV=IO0 kts SurfaceTcps
I
qp
0.1CD
0
©0
o O0
CD
E0
© _,0. _on
Ii
i 'i-20 -16 12 -8 -4 0 _ 8 12 _6 20
Angle-0f-Attack (deg)
Figure 19 Hinge Moment Characteristics, Large Deflections
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 25
V=lOOkts Surface taps
i i iliii........ ,..._.,....<_..: ..Jr.._. , : : " : :.--...-;--i--. -_-- --- ,........... 1 ............
;..; .: .; ...... :..;_..,._.4__i,..:..:_.:. , : : : : .... :.. : ....: ...... ....:4..._. :.._.., b,.-_'.... : ..: ..... : ..;..:. :..... :.. :. :. : _
"--' " i'.L:---:i _ : : : .,_'r"i,: : : : : : : : : : :c_ 0.06 -_.._. _1D
• ; -( -i ",-l--) -;- ;--:- I ;--; :( -r-;--i--:-:-1 --I- --,
" "" " " " " " .... - " "'" ' " - ...... " " ; - " " " ....... + Ba_elTne
0.02 ..... : ' : .... _ Le'_ic e
.................................. J..:..: .i ..... : ...................... :..
' '!f " ...... ">i--: .... !!i < ..... >! ..... i < " -
0.00 - ' '
0.000._.._.. ..... ._ ............ , ............ , .......... , ............
--- --'-- --' -4- - '---'- --.i -, , , __, _.., .,..,....i..,......
"ii!-!_!ii :"! i!! ..... !i!i ..... ,]_,.!:-0.002 , , ,
¢_ --0,004 "-,,,........ / .... : : , ,'-. : i : :
z -0,006 ' er'- ..... : : : : .... ,,=,: ,o ................ _- :-:..:_ " ..... :. :..:._: .... :.: .; ..... _..: ..... ; .
': " (: ': " " : " : " {-: ...... : : '] " { .... : " ' ' ' ' ' -r-
l L l / I I I
-30 -20 -1 0 0 1 0 20
6e (deg)
Figure 20 Lift Curve and Hinge Moment Slopes
NAS,adCR--2000-209921/VOL 1 26
0.08
0.06
_" 0.04
3
0.02
0.00
oo.,,= t:: t::J :¸¸::0.06 : : : '. : : " ' : " ' ' : : : '. : : : '. : : ' ' : :
0.02 :-:::::: _'i._.;.i-i. li.i..il;.i.lii
0.00 : " : " : : ...... : : ......
0.08
0.05
_" 0.04
3...... iiilli__ii' i i i' !.i/li _I(',i_;_' ....
0.02 ....
0.00 : : : ' : : : ....... :':::' ;;';:i-18 -14 -10 -6 -2 2 6 10
AOA (deg)
0.08
0.08
o.o_
0.02
e_mi._-2o-ze J
":::1: ::1: ::1 :: :1: : :1: ::": :i]0.00 ................
-18 -1¢ -10 -6 -2 2 5 10
^o_ ((_)
Figure 21 Elevator Lift Effectiveness (V= 100 kts, Surface Taps)
0000
-0002
-0004-
-0006
-0008
0.0o0
¸i¸.i.14.1¸1-i[-i i i l i.i i.lli I.L._,-I.I :
i i ii i ii_0 _002
i,-_' -i-/i i i"-:, i! i _
::i:i:l;_i:i::l_::i:::l:i__-_;:-i- _ -0004-....
:: ......... : ::_I i:!_'i/!!i_!:_,ii : :ii 'i: !:: -o.oo6:.
_,:,_,_E%}%.... . : i :i i -, ! !i-
-0.008
.: " I " : ] : : ] :..:.; L: .: :.I .: : .:.J :.: .:.
ii ........... iiiiiililtliliill!! iiti!i_ili-: :-;-r-.-;-:--I-;-:-:-i ;-:-; I--: .:-:--I -: -. 1 ;-. -:-
i -i: \ii- i-:- -!-i "%-i
.: : : .... 2.:..I.:.:..:.] :..: : L : 2.2 I : :-.J :-: :
: : : : ' : : ;" ; , ,
O00Q
-0 002
-0004
-0 006
-0008-18
/'.!2 :.!.i ',.JL.!..].!!.!.IL!!.',.!L:.:.:.:.:..
.:..:.:..Li.: ..: :.:.. ;.:..:/.:.: ;..:.: ;.--."::_-.:..
+i_/i___iiikiiiii/ ii 'iI I!!i !il
"" I' ": "':::I :: : ..... /-za::: : :7::: : ;';'] ' ' ' I ' ' ' ] " '"
-14 -10 -6 -2 2 6 1 0
AOA (deg)
0.000
-0.002
"" -0.004-
--0.006
............... I ' ' I'''1' ' '
iil :i:! :[ i:!i: I:I[Z ]i : :il/ ..... --Y-_°
ii_!!i-i_/t i__ ii!:\? ::: ::i:":"
-0.008 ..........-18 -14 -10 -6 -2 2 6 10
AOA (deg)
Figure 22 Elevator Hinge Moment Effectiveness (V=100 kts, Surface Taps)
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL l 27
d
C-
q_
0
0
o_
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataBaseline Surface Taps
1.6 .... , ! ! , ! !
------0-- re= 0.0, V=60 kts ;I" _ :
1.2 + #e= o.o, v=l oo kts ' [ ' _'' ; _"---E--- _e=-zo.o,v=eokts : ; : // I----:--i--_... _ ! !---_-- .=-_o.o,v.,oo_. i .... i ....=;¢ ...... ........ -_'
0.8 -- -- _ -- _e= 14- 2, V=60 kts
_e- 14.2, V--lO0 kts_ .:. .
o.o--i........................5-0.4
-0.8 i _r_'-
-1.2 I__: _
-1.6
-2.0-24 -20 -1 6 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 1 6 20
Angle-of-Attac k (deg)
Figure 23 Velocity Effects, Baseline, Lift Characteristics
J
c--
O
O
DHC--6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataLEWlCE Ice Shape Surface Taps
-1 .6
-1 .2
-0.8
-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
i_212
Figure 24
8 4 0 -4 -8 -12 -1 6 -20
Angle-of--Attack (deg)
Velocity Effects, LEWICE Ice Shape, Lift Characteristics
NASA/CR--2000-209921 ]VOL 1 28
z
_5
(L:,
C:
CL_
EO
v
DHC-5 TailploneB,sseline
':OSU 7X1 O WFnd Tunnel =,,_'s;s,L
Su rfac _ To,._,_'-,_
Figure 25 Velocity Effects, Baseline, Hinge Characteristics
DHC-6Toilslone ,S,S_I 7 iL?,"A/Tnd--unnel E:'ot,s
LEWlCE ice Shape Surf,sceTaps
0.2_
z
C'.!@
()L-
O
o 0.0
EC'
z
¢' -0.I
I
-L;'.2-20 -1 6 -12 - 8 - 4 C,
Ang e-of-A+tack(,deg)
i4 F, 1 _
Figure 26 Velocity Effects, LEWICE Ice Shape, Hinge Moment Characteristics
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 29
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataBaseline V=I O0 kts
• , :'l'.....................- ;#- _i I ....:,1 2 _ _ Oe- 0,0. Belt Taps I• - - • - - ¢_e-- - 20.0, Surface Tooa
--o--,,--2o.0,Be,<,o0,..........L// ............o,8 -.-- _.-,,._,_o_oo.,o., i ' ' i)_ -'-_- --_-- _.=_4.2,B=.Top= i : / _ -"_m i........ E..... J • _ "'r " : .... r "_ d" ..... : ....... : •
: i : i : / i
0.4 f : : :c _i ...... i . i....................... i ..........
0.0 i i a
_- i i ij
o_ -o.4...:....i..._,;-0.8
-_.6 " =_::Sl j:--P:,....i I
" I ....... !..........i 2 I 0
I
-24 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 20
Angle-of-Attac k (deg)
Figure 27 Tap Line Comparison, Baseline, Lift Characteristics
d
C
@
O
,+_@
O
LD
M.-
_J
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataLEWICE Ice Shape V=I O0 kts
I , 2 __L__J___'__L__
-. "_ 6¢-O.O. SurfaccTaps
_1¢= 0.0, Belt Taps
0.8 _ --I-- 8e--20.O. SurfaceTaos- - O - " _e- -20.0, Belt T_0s
--k--- 6I- 14.2, Surface Topm
--L_-- - _e= 14.2, Belt Tap=
o.4 .....................
0.o i :,
-0.4 ............... _
• : .... ; ........ i=_4
-1.2
-1.6-20
! ! _ ! , !
, .._._,
! :-_>
-16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12
Angle-of-Attac k (deg)
Figure 28 Tap Line Comparison, LEWICE Ice Shape, Lift Characteristics
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 30
}HC 6Tailp!ane OSU 7XlOWindTunnel Dat,s_aselTne V=IO0 kts
0._
I
o 0.2
©
_, 0._Q,
0
©
E @@©
©
c -01
' [-0.2 ; ! i i ,-24 -20 -16 -12 -8 4 0 4 8 12 16 20
Angle-of-AttacK (deg)
Figure 29 Tap Line Comparison, Baseline, Hinge Moment Characteristics
Figure 30
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataLEWlCE Ice Shape V=I O0 kts
T
CP
C
©CP
f-
8o
@
c-
-I-
0.2
0.1
0.0
_-........... ' ...... ' ........... ' .......... ' ......... ' " ----0-- 6e- 0.0, Surface Taps
r ..... ......... i ........ '--." -, .... i .... --t .... i ...... + ,.-0.0, ..It Tap.
.... : ...... i .......... u:.:.-_l .... .........I!j : ....... --l-- _,--20.0.so_oo,Top,....... , ..................... --,I_'- - _e- 14.2, SuOace Tap_
; : "_ : --_--- _e= 1 4.2, Bert Tapsi _ m
.. : ........ ; ........... i ......... i ..... -L:_'......... i .......... i.......
_ 0 _ 1
t
.... i ........ i ........... i ...... i .......... i .......... i .......... _....... : ....
-0.2 : _ _ _ i i _ i-20 -1 6 -1 2 -8 -4 0 ¢ 8
Angle-of-Attcc k (deg)
2
Tap Line Comparison, LEWICE Ice Shape, Hinge Moment Characteristics
NASA/CR--2000-209921 ]VOL 1 31
1,60
1.15
0.70
0.25
-0.20
-0.65
-1.10
-1.55
-2.00
" - • .... 6e=-26.6 Repeot
6e= D.D ', ..... ', - - .,_- S- '---_ ..... 6_=0.0Rep_o_ ' I / ' ' i,::_'''_ ,,
6e-- '14.2_ , -
!7 '----,--- _o=_4.2R_p_t J:. :i_,,,:._"' '• . • i , r : . . ,
0.3.o .= ..... ,.. ...... ,....... ,....... , ....... , ....... , ....
............ _............................................ •- - 6e--2e_6 n_t
.. - :- ..... '- -_ . . :....... ;....... ',....... ;....... : ........ 4,- - _o--:,e_e_,,:tOe= 0.0
0.2 l,.: ....... ! i I i ! .......... ........_,-oo,,..," " "' ............ ' ...... '" _ _l,=14.2
" " ._" r " : "" _-m:--_l- - : ....... '. "I ": " I : I --,i,---- _-14.2 ,,_,,._..... p,F ..... I '_-"PF" - _-i ...... '...... I ...... I"
...':_/4...':......:.._L..:..!'.__._.=...:...I...:._J......_...................0.1 , .... 1_,,,: .,, , ....
0.0...: ..... :.._.. : ..=..,.,....._,._- "'.-w.... : ...: ...... :..... T'-:2..._:%.'...... :..... ; .... __.
': .... f ..... :...... :...... :..... : , ,'x! ........:,-0.1 ..? ..... ?...... !....... !....... !....... !....... !...... !....... [email protected] ..... i
!!iii[i!i!!! i!fiiiliiiii !!iiii i!iiiiiiiii!!i-24 -20 -16 --12 -8 -4- 0 4 8 12 16 20
Figure 31 Baseline Repeatability, V=100 kts, Surface Taps
NASAJCR--2000-209921/VOL 1 32
1.60
1.15
0.7O
0.25
-0.20
-0.65
-1.1 0
-1.55
-2.00
--r4-- 6e--26,6 ' '- - i- - 6e--26.B Repeet .....- - • - - 6e=-26.5 Repeat
........_-_........ 6e=O0 ;- ,-.'..-r -:- -,---i .... --'---,---.---,.--:--
+ Be= 0.0 Ropea_ _',--J _ -.-4i j t , , : . .
L_IT/.... i....... f" : " " " ....... ;- - i" -:..... i .... t ..... : ..... ;....
.: ..... :...... :....... :....... :..:,::- ..... : ..... :, 4 d./
l
/ ....
.t -i-I'.!:.,i .ti" : : : :
i i r _ i ' I
0.5 ....... : [ I I ]
---:- ..... :.... --: ....... : , : ",- ":-- ,- :- " _, --El-- _--2e.8...... L ..... i....... i....... i ....... l ....... i ...... -_-i -- III- - _._,, - 26.8 l_il_t
... :- . - , . :... ,.. - :....... : ....... :....... : ....... : ..... _I' .... _o--26-6 Rep_ot
0.2 ..... ;.... .-oo":I7I ", _-_,I"I"I ----v--- _-14.2
:.:---I: :l:: ::::I::::::::::::::::::::::::::::--'-.:___._:...i... i--_L..!...I..... .':1_,.,,,...I..... J.-:- .,.-:.-_-. _.... ,-0.1 " ' ' ' -'" .....
:::i:: ::i:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
o.o :..i i. :.... i..-_i:_:....:-., k ..... i.... i .... i..
-0.1 ........
...: ...... :...... :....... :....... :....... :....... : ...... :....... . ........... ;..-0.2 ......
--24 -20 -16 --12 -8 -4- 0 4 8 12 16 20
Figure 32 LEWICE Ice Shape Repeatability, V=100 kts, Surface Taps
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 33
',_..... __, _ ......._;,J: 7 Y, 1 u,_......4'_.... 7 u _.... ,,c ! _; a : <_
1.2
Argie- of-At t':;c k _,,,_ ,9 ,_
Figure 33 Section 2 Lift Characteristics Comparison
< >
(i)
0
Cil
0
©
i_tHO -- EbToiis one 0<' " ...... '_ I.; ©c.tc_, _t,J ,"Vj U ';Vl _ _@
;).f
0.0
I- ...........................
- - = J .... ] ' ...i -t--- oe= 20 ?._'_,;:.-,r.-I--- _e= 0C _:._el:r!e
---A--- 4e= 4 Z. _-3o-:'elm_
.... v%4.
24 -20 -'6 --1_! -8 --4 ,L- 4
Figure 34 Section 2 Hinge Moment Comparison
8 12
NASA/CR--2000-209921 ]VOL 1 34
Figure 35 Baseline Tuft Flow Visualization, o_ = -8.0 °, _e " 0"0°
NASAJCR--2000-209921/VOL 1 35
Figure 36 S&C Ice Shape Tuft Flow Visualization, o_ =-8.0°,$e=0.0 °
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 36
C_
rd
O
(.3
¢]
CO
L_
£L
c_LP
-4
-3
-2
1
DbC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel DataRur" 62 V=I O0 kts, Surface Taps
+
C2
2-01 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
x/c
Figure 37 Baseline Cp Distribution, ec =-8.0 °, _e----0.0 °
:.0
DHC-6Tailpane OSU7XlOWindTunnel DateRun 60, V=100 kts, Surface Taps
-4
3"d
._u 2©
0
(.3
©
o1,
G_
¢£(.3
0 Stob, S_c1
• Stab• Pres.
+ Boot To _ --
r " " _ ] 0 2 E4ev.Suct ', , , . . , i _ , • Elev Pres
.... i 1. . _FI . .
_9o_)O0o ; :'. .... '..... n _ ...... - , , I
0
p,,,,,.,"(' " I '
• [ ,
l
,0,1 0.O 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4- 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
x/c
Figure 38 S&C Ice Shape Cp Distribution, e_ =-8.0 °, _}e=0.0 °
NASA]CR--2000-209921 ]VOL 1 37
DHC-6TaTipiane OSU 7×lC, W[ndTunr, e Date5 Hole Probe q indie,ation,\/=dO0 kts, 8e,-O.O
8 _ 2 1 6 2 0
Figure 39 5-Hole Probe Dynamic Pressure Comparison
DHC-6 Tailplsne OSU 7XI 0 W]rid TL. nrsei Dctc5-Hoie Probe AOA indication, V=100 _,ts, 5e=0.O
{/1
t._
C,"l
©
cl
c_
0.2
0,1
0.0
' I ' ! '
I , ,i j,, :
-0.t
-0.2
--0,5-24 -20 -
-i ......
6 -1 2 -8 -4 0 4 #3 1 2 1 6 20
Angle-of-Attack (,deg)
Figure 40 5-Hole Probe Pressure Differential due to Angle-of Attack
NASAJCR--2000-209921/VOL 1 38
DHC-6 Tailplane OSU 7X1 0 Wind Tunnel Data5-Hole Probe Sideslip Indication, V=I O0 kts, 6e=O.O
Q_
v
@I,_
03
O3
@k_
EL
0
©
d_
0.04
0.02
0.00
I ! ! ! ! I
• ' --O'_ Baseline i "
LEWlCEi
]
Angle-of-Attac k (deg)
Figure 41 5-Hole Probe Pressure Differential due to Sideslip
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 39
8. CONCLUSIONS
A set of data quantifying the 2-D aerodynamics of the DHC-6 Twin Otter tailplane,
uniced, and with representative ice shapes, has been obtained. Instrumentation that will be used
during future flight testing has been verified to be effective. The results obtained are consistent
with expected aerodynamic trends and observed responses during typical pushover maneuvers.
The effects of icing that would have the greatest effect on aircraft stability and control
were shown in the changes in lift and hinge moment. For the uniced airfoil with Be=0 ° elevator
deflection, CLmax=-l.3 and AOAst_H=-18.6 °. With the LEWICE ice shape, these values were
reduced to CLmax=-0.64 and AOAst_ll=-8.2 °. Hinge moment data for the LEWICE ice shape at
6e=-20 ° showed that CH increased by ACH=0.02 (trailing edge down) about AAOA=2.3 ° before
the stall. These results supported observed responses during typical pushover maneuvers.
Reynolds number variation did not result in any strong characteristic differences in the
coefficient data with either ice shape installed. Reynolds number effects were seen for the uniced
baseline airfoil, with a lowering of stall AOA by approximately AAOA=2 ° and a decrease in liftcoefficient at the slower 60 kts velocities.
The elevator extension and large slot of the baseline airfoil section had a significant effect
on the pressure distributions. This was verified by testing of the secondary airfoil section, which
showed increased lift, CLma×= 1.35, and a decreased negative angle of attack at stall, AOA=- 16.5 °.
Hinge moment also increased, approximately ACH=0.04 for 5_---0.0 ° and -20.0 ° near stall. All of
the components that will be used in future flight testing showed acceptable fidelity. The pressure
belt should be a good source of data, however, care must be taken when evaluating these results,
as coefficient values can be lowered if the belt is immersed in largely separated flow. The 5-Hole
Probe data showed the expected trends with velocity, angle of attack, and sideslip. Differences in
dynamic pressures were seen between the tunnel and the probe values, as well as between the
baseline and LEWICE configuration data. Calibration of the probe, at a later date, will allow
more complete assessment of the probe accuracy and configuration dependencies.
These results have given an effective set of data with which to begin an analysis of
tailplane aerodynamics in icing conditions. The data will allow the tailplane aerodynamics during
simulated maneuvering flight to be quantified. The flight test instrumentation will allow
verification and refinement of these aerodynamics during flight test maneuvers. This combination
of simulation and flight test will allow a more complete understanding of the contribution of the
tailplane to the aircrafts motion during maneuvering flight. This understanding will be needed,
and fully utilized, in the development of maneuvers to identify aircraft susceptible to tailplane
stall in icing conditions.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 40
Appendix A
Tap Locations
Section 1, Clean
TAP# X/C TAP# X/C
1 -.0011 31 .3000
2 .0003 32 .3500
3 .0001 33 .3500
4 .0041 34 .4000
5 .0039 35 .4000
6 .0100 36 .4500
7 .0100 37 .4500
8 .0175 38 .5000
9 .0169 39 .5000
10 .0250 40 .5226
11 .0250 41 .5243
12 .0373 42 .5180
13 .0380 43 .5185
14 .0500 52 .5261
15 .0500 53 .5363
16 .0750 54 .5354
17 .0750 55 .5462
18 .1000 56 .5449
19 .1000 57 .5759
20 .1256 58 .5741
21 .1260 59 .5955
22 .1500 60 .5936
23 .1500 61 .6152
24 .1753 62 .6131
25 .1750 63 .6346
26 .2000 64 .6326
27 .2000 70 .6569
28 .2500 71 .6589
29 .2500 72 .7009
30 .3000 73 .7026
TAP # X/C
74 .7448
75 .7463
76 .7888
77 .7901
78 .8327
79 .8338
80 .8767
81 .8775
82 .9207
83 .9212
84 .9646
85 .9650
86 1.0000
Note s:
1) Stabilizer taps are #1-43, elevator taps are #52-86
2) Surface Taps do not include #63, and #64.
3) Belt Taps do not include #42, #43, #57, #63, #74, #78, and #82.
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL 1 41
Section 2, Clean
TAP# X/C TAP# X/C
1 -.0011 31 .3000
2 .0003 32 .3500
3 .0001 33 .3500
4 .0041 34 .4000
5 .0039 35 .4000
6 .0100 36 .4500
7 .0100 37 .4500
8 .0175 38 .5000
9 .0169 39 .5000
10 .0250 44 .5500
11 .0250 45 .5500
12 .0373 46 .6000
13 .0380 47 .6000
14 .0500 48 .6173
15 .0500 49 .6086
16 .0750 50 .6084
17 .0750 51 .6089
18 .1000 65 .6119
19 .1000 66 .6164
20 .1256 67 .6174
21 .1260 68 .6297
22 .1500 69 .6314
23 .1500 70 .6569
24 .1753 71 .6589
25 .1750 72 .7009
26 .2000 73 .7026
27 .2000 74 .7448
28 .2500 75 .7463
29 .2500 76 .7888
30 .3000 77 .7901
TAP # X/C
78 .8327
79 .8338
80 .8767
81 .8775
82 .9207
83 .9212
84 .9646
85 .9650
86 1.0000
Notes:
1) Stabilizer taps are #1-51, elevator taps are #65-86
2) Surface Taps do not include #76.
3) Belt Taps do not include #63 through #86.
NAS,_dCR--2000-209921/VOL 1 42
S&CIce ShapeTaps
TAP# X/C Y/C
1 -.0084 .00302 -.0027 .02013 -.0014 -.01504 -.0018 .03155 -.0019 -.02646 .0088 .03087 .0088 -.02758 .0175 .02869 .0175 -.0258
Notes:1)TheseTapsreplaceSurfaceTaps#1 through#I 1.2) TheseTapsreplaceBeltTaps#1 through#9.
LEWICE IceShapeTaps
TAP # X/C Y/C
1 -.0104 .00292 -.0207 .03383 -.0165 -.02824 -.0044 .02395 -.0044 -.0213
Notes:1)TheseTapsreplaceSurfaceTaps#1through#5,and#7.2)TheseTapsreplaceBeltTaps#1through#5.
NASA/CR--2000-209921]VOL 1 43
Y/C
0.1
0.05
0
-0,05
-01
-0,1
Section 1 (Baseline)
I
10 'Tlk I _I0_
11/ 19 0 0
i
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
X/C
X 64 76
41. 0_-: 0 0
o ,,_'-' / 7-_\ I_1 57 e_ 71 1'7
[£3
o o/": j
m/
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 I
01
0.05
Y/C 0
-005
-0.1
-0.1
Section 2
G
0_:_ 0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
'I, " ,70 Io o _ '. _ ®°k°L 6o,
, 51- _ • 0 0
o , o, ,oj ,,0.4 0.5 0.6 07 0.8
X/C
DHC-6 Tailplane Airfoil Section Tap Locations
09 1
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL 1 44
>-
-1
-2
LEWICEIceShape
/\
JJ
-3.2 .1 0 1 2 3
_c{%}
00
-I
-2
.31-2
S&Ck:eS_e
• " " " ' .... i .............. " " " " "
5<
6
f/
_J1
J,*,[,l*, ll,,
2 3 4
Ice Shape Tap Locations
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 45
Start of Test 09-01-94, End of
Run Configuration
01 Baseline
02
03
04
O5
06
07
O8
09
l0
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Appendix B
Run Log
Test 09-20-94
Velocity Elevator AOA /Remarks
(kts) (deg) (deg)
60.0 0.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
Baseline 60.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
S&C Ice Shape 60.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
LEWICE Ice Shape 60.0
" 100.0
" 60.0
" 100.0
0.0
-10.0tl
-20.0If
-20.0
-26.6II
-26.6
10.0
14.2
14.2
_t
10.0
0.0ii
-10.0
-20.011
-26.6ft
-26.6
-20.0
18,16,14,12,10,8,6,4,2,0,-2,-4,-6,-8,
-10,-12,-14,-16,-18
12,8,4,0,-4,-8,-12,-14,-16,-18
- 18,-20,-22
12,8,4,0,-4,-8,- 12,- 14,- 16,- 18
Check Run
Check Run
12,8,4,0,-4,-8,-12,-14,-16,-18
12,8,4,0,-4,-8,- 12,- 14,- 16
12,8,4,0,-4
-8,-12,-14,-16
12,8,4,0,-4,-8,- 12,- 14,- 16,- 18
II
12,8A,0,-4,-8,- 10,- 12,- 14,
-16,-18
8,4,0,-4,-8,-10,-12,-14,-16
8,4,0,-4,-8,- 12,- 14,- 16
8,4,0,-4,-6,-8,- 10,- 12,- 14wt
vv
Bad run
8,4,0,-4,-6,-8,- 10,- 12,- 14
8,4,0,-2,-4,-6,-8,- 10,- 12Tt
T*
*v
t*
tt
Bad run
NASA/CR--2000-209921 ]VOL 1 47
Run Configuration Velocity Elevator
(kts) (deg)
AOA /Remarks
(deg)
37 LEWICE Ice Shape 60.0 - 10.0
38 " 100.0 "
39
40 " 60.0 0.0
41 " 100.0 "
42 " 60.0 10.0
43 " 100.0 "
44 " 60.0 14.2
45 " 100.0 "
46 ......
47 " 100.0 0.0
48 .... -26.6
49 ......
50 Baseline ....
51 ......
52 .... -10.0
53 " 60.0 "
54 " 60.0 0.0
55 " 100.0 "
56 " 100.0 "
57 " 100.0 14.2
58 S&C Ice Shape 60.0 "
59 " 100.0 "
60 .... 0.0_ _v In
61 .... -26.6
Baseline 60.0 "
" 60.0 0.0
62 Baseline, NP 100.0 "
63 Section 2, NP 60.0 "
64 .... -20.0
65 .... 14.2
66 .... 0.0
8,4,0,-2,-4,-6,-8,- 10,- 12
Not Used
8,6,4,2,0,-2,-4,-6,-8,- 10,
-12,-14w
8,4,0,-4,-8,- 10,- 12,- 14,- 16*t
8,4,0,-4,-8,- 10,- 12,- 14,- 16
Repeat of 045
Repeat of 041
Repeat of 033
Repeat 2 of 033
Repeat of 013
Repeat 2 of 013
Repeat of 004
Repeat of 003
Repeat of 001
Repeat of 002
Repeat of 055
Repeat of 018
Repeat of 019
Repeat of 020
Repeat of 024Flow Viz
Repeat of 031, Flow VizFlow Viz
Flow Viz
16,12,8,4,0,-4,-8,- 12,- 14,- 16,
- 18,-20, Flow Viz
8,4,0,-4,-8,- 10,- 12,- 14,- 16,Flow Viztu
ii
- 16,- 18,-20,-22,Flow Viz
Notes:
1. Runs 01 through 07 had an inoperative scanivalve.2. Run 19 had the 5-Hole Probe cover installed.
3. Wake probe sweep runs - 0001,0002,0003,0023,0024,0040,0041.00634. Wall Statics available for runs 0035 and up, only.5. Flow Viz indicates more complete tufting and documentation.6. Post run AOA=0.0 ° point for all runs after 009 not indicated.7. NP = No 5-Hole Probe.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 48
Appendix C
Video Log
This log contains a listing of the approximate time for the video taken during testing. To
conserve tape, only approximately 15 seconds of each data point were recorded. The times listed
below are the approximate start times for each run.
Run 0001 Run 0002 Run 0003/5
Date 09/08/94 Date 09/08/94 Date 09/09/94
AOA Time AOA Time AOA Time
18 1324 16 1629 12 0931
16 1328 12 1634 8 0937
14 1334 8 1639 4 0942
12 1341 4 1644 0 0947
10 1346 0 1649 -4 0952
8 1352 -4 1655 -8 0958
6 1357 -8 1700 -12 1004
4 1402 -10 1707 -14 1009
2 1407 -12 1710 -16 1013
0 1412 -14 1715 -18 1018
-2 1416 -16 1721 -18 1153
-4 1422 -20 1156
-6 1426 -22 1200
-8 1431
-10 1435
-12 1442
-14 1446
-16 1452
-18 1456
Run 0004 Run 0006 Run 0007
Date 09/09/94 Date 09/08/94 Date 09/09/94
AOA Time AOA Time AOA Time
12 1103 12 1242 12 1328
8 1106 8 1246 8 1334
4 1113 4 1249 4 1335
0 1114 0 1253 0 1339
-4 1117 -4 1256 -4 1342
-8 1120 -8 1259 -8 1346
-12 1123 -12 1303 -12 1350
-14 1127 -14 1306 -14 1354
-16 1130 -16 1309 -16 1356
-18 1133 -18 1313 -18 1359
-20 1316 -20 1403
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 49
Run 0010Date09/12/94AOA Time12 15538 15574 16000 1605-4 1606-8 1610
-12 1613-14 1616-16 1620-18 1623
Run 0011Date09/12/94AOA Time12 16398 16434 16470 1650-4 1653-8 1656-12 1700-14 1704-16 1707-18 1711
Run 0012Date09/12/94AOA Time12 17588 18014 18050 1808-4 1812-8 1815-12 1818-14 1182-16 1825
Run 0013/14Date09/12/13/94AOA Time12 18368 18404 18430 1847-4 1850-8 0929-12 0932-14 0936-16 0939
Run 0015Date09/13/94AOA Time12 10158 10194 10220 1026-4 1029-8 1032
-12 1035-14 1038-16 1042-18 1745
Run 0016Date09/13/94AOA Time12 ll018 11054 11080 1111-4 1115-8 1118-12 1122-14 1125-16 1128-18 1045
Run 0017Date09/12/13/94AOA Time12 12208 12244 12280 1232-4 1235-8 1238-12 1241-14 1244-16 1247-18 1251
Run 0018Date09/13/94AOA Time12 13058 13094 13120 1316-4 1319-8 1322-12 1326-14 1329-16 1332-18 1336
Run 0019Date09/14/94AOA Time12 10068 10104 10130 1017-4 1020-8 1024-12 1027-14 1030-16 1037-18 1040
NASAJCR--2000-209921/VOL 1 50
Run 0020
Date 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 1110
4 1114
0 1118
-4 1121
-8 1124
-10 1127
-12 1131
-14 1135
-16 1138
Run 0021
Date 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 1216
4 1220
0 1223
-4 1227
-8 1230
-10 1233
-12 1236
-16 1240
-18 1243
Run 0022
Date 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 1256
4 1300
0 1304
-4 1307
-8 1310
-10 1313
-12 1317
-16 1320
-18 1323
Run 0023
Date 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 1400
4 1406
0 1414
-4 1415
-6 1421
-8 1428
-10 1430
-12 1435
-14 1441
Run 0024
Dme 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 1458
4 1505
0 1509
-4 1515
-6 1520
-8 1525
-10 1530
-12 1537
-14 1541
Run 0025
Date 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 1628
4 1633
0 1635
-4 1639
-6 1642
-8 1645
-10 1649
-12 1652
-14 1655
Run 0026/27
Date 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 1708
4 1711
0 1715
-4 1718
-6 1722
-8 1725
-10 1728
-12 1731
-14 1849
Run 0028
Date 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 1929
4 1932
0 1938
-2 1939
-4 1943
-6 1946
-8 1949
-10 1953
-12 1956
Run 0029
Date 09/14/94
AOA Time
8 2010
4 2013
0 2016
-2 2020
-4 2023
-6 2026
-8 2029
-10 2033
-12 2036
NASAJCR---2000-20992 I/VOL 1 51
Run 0030
Date 09/15/94
AOA Time
8 0910
4 0913
0 0918
-2 0921
-4 0923
-6 0927
-8 0930
-10 0934
-12 0937
Run 0031
Date 09/15/94
AOA Time
8 0955
4 1000
0 1005
-2 1007
-4 1010
-6 1013
-8 1017
-10 1021
-12 1023
Run 0032
Date 09/15/94
AOA Time
8 1455
4 1459
0 1503
-2 1506
-4 1510
-6 1513
-8 1516
-10 1519
-12 1522
Run 0033
Date 09/15/94
AOA Time
8 1537
4 1541
0 1545
-2 1548
-4 1551
-6 1554
-8 1558
-10 1601
-12 1605
Run 0034
Date 09/15/94
AOA Time
8 1658
4 1702
0 1705
-2 1708
-4 1711
-6 1715
-8 1718
-10 1722
-12 1725
Run 0035
Date 09/15/94
AOA Time
8 1832
4 1836
0 1839
-2 1843
-4 1846
-6 1850
-8 1853
-10 1856
Run 0037
Dme 09/15/94
AOA Time
8 2012
4 2015
0 2018
-2 2021
-4 2025
-6 2028
-8 2031
-10 2034
-12 2037
Run 0038
Date 09/15/94
AOA Time
8 2053
4 2056
0 2100
-2 2103
-4 2107
-6 21t0
-8 2114
-10 2117
-12 2120
Run 0040
Date 09/16/94
AOA Time
8 0904
6 0910
4 0915
2 0920
0 0925
-2 0930
-4 0934
-6 0940
-8 0945
-10 0950
-12 0955
-14 1000
NASA/CR--2000-209921]VOLI 52
Run 0041Date09/16/94AOA Time8 11596 12054 12102 12150 1220-2 1225-4 1230-6 1235-8 1241-10 1245-12 1250-14 1256
Run 0042Date09/15/94AOA Time8 14004 14050 1409-4 1412-8 1415-10 1418-12 1421-14 1425-16 1428
Run 0043Date09/16/94AOA Time
8 16104 16140 1617-4 1620-8 1624-10 1627-12 1630-14 1633-16 1637
Run 0044Date09/16/94AOA Time8 17304 17350 1738-4 1741-8 1745-10 1748-12 1752-14 1755-16 1758
Run 0045Date09/15/94AOA Time
8 18284 18330 1835-4 1838-8 1842-10 1845-12 1848-14 1852-16 1855
NASA/CR--2000-20992I/VOL1 53
Appendix DSolid Wall Correction Calculations
The effect of the walls on the 2-dimensional airfoil data must be considered. Corrections
have been applied to the raw wind tunnel data using the methods of Ref. D 1. For this test, three
phenomena have been taken into account:
Solid Blockage
Solid blockage creates an increase of velocity due to the reduction of the area through
which the air must flow. To quantify this effect, computations have been made by considering
the two-dimensional model as a cylinder. This cylinder can be simulated as a doublet of strength
/a = 2rWa 2 (a : cylinder radius), with the walls represented by the streamlines created by matching
doublets, on each side of the cylinder. Therefore,
2AV a
V,, tl:(The subscript u indicates uncorrected data)
After doing a summation, we obtain,
with:
h : tunnel height
c : model chord
/l.2 C -
!
A=--_-16[.:Y[(1-P(l+dVllSdXcL-dx)l c
x, y: airfoil coordinates, P its no-camber,
symmetrical, pressure distribution.
Usually A is given by a graph
In our case, A = 0.22
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 55
Wake Blockage
Wake blockage creates a velocity increment at the model because of a pressure gradient
due to higher velocity which keeps the flow around the model. In computations, the wake is
simulated by a line source and the walls by an infinite vertical row of source-sink combinations.This reduces to:
AV CE.b -- -- Ca.
V,, 4h
We can, then, correct the tunnel conditions by these equations:
V = V,, (1 + e ) with :
q = q,(l+2e ) e= e_,, + e,,,,
Re = Re,(l + e )
From the dynamic pressure effect and the wake gradient term, we get:
C,_ = Cd,(l -3 e_,-2 e,t, )
Streamline Curvature
The lift and moment about the quarter chord of an airfoil are too large at a given angle of
attack (which is also too large). This is due to the fact that the airfoil seems to have more camber
because of the floor and ceiling.
Calculations of this effect are made by assuming that the airfoil can be approximated by a
single vortex at its quarter-chord point. The floor and ceiling are represented by a vertical row of
vortices, extending to infinity and with alternating signs. The load on the airfoil can be
decomposed as a flat plate loading, computed as an angle of attack correction, and an elliptical
loading, which gives the lift, pitching-moment and hinge-moment corrections.
It can be shown that the upwash induced at the half chord by the two images is:
AO_ =
2
1 c
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 56
We can consider that (c/4) 2 is small compared to h 2, so it gives 6 equal to 6 previously found,
and we have then:
57. o( )cz=a,,+ 2:,r C_,+4C,,,_,
C_ = C_,(1-<y-2e )
GC_C,/ = C,,,L,,(1 -2e)+--
4 4 4
Hinge Moment
To establish a correction for the hinge moment, we follow the same analysis process
discussed above, but we consider only the flap, or elevator, instead of the entire airfoil. We are
now at a three-quarter-chord point, so we lose accuracy by taking (3c/4)2<<h 2 in the Aot
expression.
Therefore, including this 3c/4 term results in 6'= 0.9 6.
So,
C} -t
C,, = Ch,,(1- 2e )+-4-CI,-with:
C_f : lift coefficient of the elevator
References
D 1. Rae, W. and Pope, A., Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, Wiley-Interscience, 1984.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 57
Appendix E
Data Reduction Output File Formats
Uncorrected Coefficients
File Name: AA500XX.DAT
Run: 00XX
Column Value
1
2
3
4
5
6
AOA (degrees)
Elevator Deflection (degrees)
Mach Number
Reynolds Number (millions)
Q (psi)
Velocity (kts.)
From Surface Taps
7 CL (total)
8 CD (pressure only)
9 CM (1/4c)
10 CL (Elevator only)
11 C. (Elevator)
From Belt Taps
12 CL
13 CD (pressure only)
14 CM (1/4c)
15 CL (Elevator only)
16 Ca (Elevator)
17 Run Number
Corrected Coefficients using Surface Taps
File Name: SC500XX.DAT
Run: 00XX
Column Value
AOA (degrees)
Elevator Deflection (degrees)Mach Number
Reynolds Number (millions)
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL 1 59
5 Q (psi)
6 Velocity (kts.)
7 CL (total)
8 CD (pressure only)
9 CM (1/4c)
10 CH (Elevator)
Corrected Coefficients using Belt Taps
File Name: BC500XX.DAT
Run: 00XX
Column Value
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AOA (degrees)
Elevator Deflection (degrees)
Mach Number
Reynolds Number (millions)
Q (psi)
Velocity (kts.)
CL (total)
CD (pressure only)
CM (1/4C)
C. (Elevator)
Probe Pressures
File Name: PP500XX.DAT
Run: 00XX
Column Value
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AOA (degrees)
Elevator Deflection (degrees)
Mach Number
Reynolds Number (millions)
Q (psi)
Velocity (kts.)
P Total (psi.)
P Static (psi.)
P AOA 1 (psi.) (for AOA Suction side )
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 60
10
11
12
P AOA 2 (psi.) (for AOA Pressure side )
P Beta 1 (psi.) (for Sideslip R/H side )
P Beta 2 (psi.) (for Sideslip L/H side )
Wall Static Pressures
(Available for Runs 0035 and up, only. )
File Name: WS500XX.DAT
Run: 00XX
Column Value
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
AOA (degrees)
Elevator Deflection (degrees)
Mach Number
Reynolds Number (millions)
Q (psi)
Velocity (kts.)
Ps West Forward (psi.)
Ps West Center (psi.)
Ps West Aft (psi.)
Ps East Forward (psi.)
Ps East Center (psi.)
Ps East Aft (psi.)
NASA/CR--2000-20992 l/VOL 1 61
Appendix F
DHC-6 Twin Otter Tailplane Coefficient Data
Figure F.01
Figure F.02
Figure F.03
Figure F.04
Figure F.05
Figure F.06
Figure F.07
Figure F.08
Figure F.09
Figure F.10
Figure F.11
Figure F.12
Figure F.13
Figure F.14
Figure F.15
Figure F.16
Figure F.17
Figure F.18
Figure F.19
Figure F.20
Figure F.21
Figure F.22
Figure F.23
Figure F.24
Figure F.25
Figure F.26
Figure F.27
Figure F.28
Figure F.29
Figure F.30
Figure F.31
Figure F.32
Figure F.33
Figure F.34
Figure F.35
Figure F.36
Figure F.37
Figure F.38
Figure F.39
Baseline, 100 kts .......................................................................................................... 64
Baseline, 60 kts ............................................................................................................ 65
Baseline, 100 kts, Belt Taps ....................................................................................... 66
Baseline, 60 kts, Belt Taps ......................................................................................... 67
Lewice Ice Shape 100 kts ........................................................................................... 68
Lewice Ice Shape 60 kts ............................................................................................. 69
Lewice Ice Shape, 100 kts, Belt Taps ........................................................................ 70
Lewice Ice Shape, 60 kts, Belt Taps .......................................................................... 71
S&C Ice Shape, 100 kts .............................................................................................. 72
S&C Ice Shape, 60 kts ................................................................................................. 73
S&C Ice Shape, 100 kts, Belt Taps ............................................................................ 74
S&C Ice Shape, 60 kts, Belt Taps .............................................................................. 75
Ice Shape Effects 100 kts, Positive Elevator ............................................................ 76
Ice Shape Effects 100 kts, Negative Elevator .......................................................... 77
Ice Shape Effects 60 kts, Positive Elevator .............................................................. 78
Ice Shape Effects 60 kts, Negative Elevator ............................................................ 79
Ice Shape Effects Belt Taps, 100 kts, Positive Elevator ......................................... 80
Ice Shape Effects Belt Taps, 100 kts, Negative Elevator ........................................ 81
Ice Shape Effects Belt Taps, 60 kts, Positive Elevator ........................................... 82
Ice Shape Effects Belt Taps, 60 kts, Negative Elevator .......................................... 83
Velocity Effects, Baseline ............................................................................................ 84
Velocity Effects, Baseline, Belt Taps ......................................................................... 85
Velocity Effects, Lewice Ice Shape ............................................................................ 86
Velocity Effects, Lewice Ice Shape, Belt Taps ......................................................... 87
Velocity Effects, S&C Ice Shape ................................................................................ 88
Velocity Effects, S&C Ice Shape, Belt Taps ............................................................. 89
Tap Line Effects Baseline, 100 kts ............................................................................ 90
Tap Line Effects Baseline, 60 kts .............................................................................. 91
Tap Line Effects Lewice Ice Shape, 100 kts ............................................................ 92
Tap Line Effects Lewice Ice Shape, 60 kts .............................................................. 93
Tap Line Effects S&C Ice Shape, 100 kts ................................................................ 94
Tap Line Effects S&C Ice Shape, 60 kts .................................................................. 95
Repeatability, Baseline ................................................................................................ 96
Repeatability, Baseline, Belt Taps ............................................................................. 97
Repeatability, Lewice Ice Shape ................................................................................ 98
Repeatibility, Lewice Ice Shape, Belt Taps .............................................................. 99
Repeatability, S&C Ice Shape .................................................................................. 100
Repeatability, S&C Ice Shape, Belt Taps ............................................................... 101
Section 2 Comparison, V=100 kts, Surface Taps ................................................. 102
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 63
I
P O
I
I
I
I
A,
Q
0
_C 0
_5coo qIIlOwIIIIII
_I "°
, I
O
O uO
o dI
!
i
o/ _
O
73 quo!o!Uao0 UL7
u3
0
i
i
I
I
I
lq
I •
,I;t
'o
O
Lr) 0 ©
I
©
E
_ U
oE@
0
O
IG,
0LO
e
I
I
\ t
! \ \
\.\ ,
1
, \\
"\\
_oooqN
illO_U|Illloceoo@
i1'1
(D
(N
,3
\
_ 7
I
0 _ O _n o in o I
_ d o dI 7 7
@--_ T)
, U0 0
<
]3 'lua!3!.t.mo3 U!7
_OdoqN
IIIIlll
, I I. I I
/;I#.' I
71/I
;T t
T,e_t #l,
o_/<
@..,"
_0
00 0
<I
_3I
113 __
c
<t'N
TID
7
I
........................... i .................. (M
I._ c,l 0 CNt,%
0 d o 0 o dI I
_3 'lua!3gjao3 IUaLUOI__6UJH
0\
\
_i _$_
]
L_
' \
r
0 0 0
M_ 'pJoq3t/_ ID lua! 3u_ao3_,uawo_ 6u!q 3_.!d
P,,
NASA/CR--2000-209921 ]VOL 1 64
(0
i#oo l_i
N_qov
FINIIIlU
0
.it, _!tTtT:, . 03
t xc
l il J_ o
I *I o
' /I
t _e I d
,, _ ,,,L Jb,, 0
0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 0
d o o
73 'luo!o!tJoo31.J?]
0
i, '_ (% r_ c.,t
,\\ ,! \
_Y
, , )
°°_6doq_ "N N_ _> Qilio--
mmm_m
L ',il' _ o, I/lit
_1 0 _ 0 a 0 _ 0 I
_ d o o _ _i I I I
0@oo .......... _ ..................... (M_6doq_
_111111 ;M)
. I I _ ,_ _..,
\ ;l//" ..IS _ + _e
, _ _
ri,7 ,!0
11 i . E
_ _
0
I
c_ "Z. 0 _. e_ld o d o d
I
H3 ']ua!o!JJa0O ]ua_o_ a6U!H
b E1 I _. (N
z,, zg _ /• tel
,,j
\ I -,-,
L "% J _ }
• I ,I ¢
......... • .................................. 04
"G cN 'Z 0 _ c_lo o o o o c_
I I
I'I3 'p2o4.3 _/_ _ :_ue!o!j_eoO :.uawo_ 6u!qol?d
i8
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 65
©
.............. I .... l .... ! ........ 0
_00' ' ' ONmOO , -
I I I 0_ IH I 1111111
I 0
?+,+4, ,.l!l/f I
f I o
It i :rq _
6;_: o
I t o
, /
l.,13 O U0 O L,O O I._ O O
73 ']ua!o!_-JaO31Jt'l
O..,,,,.,,, .... , .... i .... i .... i,,,, (N
II
II
12 "\ \
\
-:\)\ _,\
'a %
\\
,\
k
• \
I,+\ '
\
_oo
iii o--IIIlUleeu_
\. '\I
sI ,w O_k\ '
• \
0 _ 0 _q 0 tO OI
d o d N
c_
_i
O0 o
<_
?)
]3 'I_at3tJ-la°3 "t.!!q
Bill|HI
1',3
0
H3 '_lUa!D!_.Ja0_) }uauJ0 R a6u!H
0,,,, ....... ,, .............. ,,,,, ...........
@_ ._ _._, ,t- oI
0_" _ 0 O
e o_ I°a6_ ! , I,,,,: - p _ _F-_ _-°° -
'1 ',\ 1 N
._u+,. m $ _ ®
0 a-"" _ _ 4 o
iii" cxjI
0 0 0 0 0 0I I
t_3'PJ°q3#/L lo lUa!_g_ao3;uawoR 6u!qo1!d
[,,,,
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 66
0
d
q
l I I I
1:)'lu _1_!;p03UIG
0r,,,l .... n .... ,,,,_| .... i .... ! ....
• I qO
, !
I'. ', \ ,\ YQO
, r_
"i,_ _ 'l .2gU
......
i
uO 0 U_ 0 tO 0 tO Of
I I I I
d
_00 I ....._000 - .
tllO--_
IIII1_1
,I I.11
/
h
?,7 :!
II• I , t,
l/
gI
"4-
.................................... 04i
O_
0 o 0 o dI I
HD'_u_!3!;J_o0_uawol_e6U!H
tO
(xl
_NC
O0 o
<
13I
@
(N
7cO
P,I
ID
U
O O
<
'e t
I
c
<tN
?_D
I
I
C,I ,-: 0 ,-: C,II
0 0 0
I I
ii,
13 '}uB!_!jjao3 iJ!7 B_) 'PJ°q3 i_/I )0 ]U_! olJJeo_) ]UBLUOlA I 6u!q_I!d
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 67
0.............. I .... { ..............
LDO0 O__ddo • •
I f I °_HmNHtlH
©
:'1 I' i
• _-
oI °u
i t-O
uI ,q_=
l °
i
Q r
C
0 I._ 0 u3 0 tO 0 0
I I I 1
_3 ':lug! _!]1_00 ]J]-I
OI ................. TTr .... .... ID4
_N
_ ; n .,x,-z, 03!7 ,
k' U
\ ._' I
', \ t-/ _ •
ii INII I It I LO
I
:1'I:
0 _ 0 tn o to 0 I
_ d o 6 7 7
13 'lUa!3!_.jao3 _j!'q
_00
dddoq_
II10_IIIIIIIII
//
_ 4,,,¢
!
I _,_ _
li
L''I,ILI .... 1' ', ',*",,'
m, _ _ od d o c_
n _
©
T_D
• t
o 6I I
H3 ':luaio!_jaoO luau_o_ a6U!H
00
_o
O0 o
0
<
_OOoq_ui10--
04'4, I I
J/|/I
. /
x ;1
d d
-L -_-
l,I
/ #/
io
I
,4-
5
0 0 0 0
I I
0(N
_13'PJ°q317/I. _o _.ua'p!j_.ao3 lua_o_ 6u?q3_,!d
O0
00 o
I*+.
0
¢-
N
7
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 68
.............. | ..................
_oo
6ddoq_
iliiNfll_
, I I
, I/Ill
o
/
o1J®
4
' l i
lit 1_ /@ !"
i '_\ / i
b
ill_LJLip _,,* .... : ....... ' ....
o _ o _ o u_ o u
6 o 0 _ _ r_I I I I
In
0
E
U"3
oo
u_D
cJ ao
o
o
................................. (D(_I
\J'\ \
_booq_
.... o_ _
III0---IIII_III
:'III' o
,1///I
o _ o _ o _ o I
_ 0 0 0 _
uo o
<
I_0 __
E
<
_oo
gddo°N
II_ I I I II
I
41
IL
0_
00 0
<
0
e4
_D
¥
t
......... ,, ..... , ....... ,, ,,, .............. ("4
,o 04 'z o "z c,llo d o d o d
I I
H3 'lUa!_UJaO3luawo_aBU!H
o
®oo i_6do '_1
III0'_' 0IIII_l '-
/
,'/ / /
. I .X
:,_ i ,j
_ I
vi E_
.9 (N 'Zd 0 o
i /... ,_ i _c
/
tO
• I
o ,7. _Io o (5
1 f
_3'P_°4O'e/L10lua!D!)Ja°3luaw°_6u!q:)1!d
8
,3
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 69
_0
.............. i .... J' ........ i .... 0
_ddoq_NN--.O_
\
iL
I
_v
7g
u"3 O ID O
0
.¢
od
00
_ C3
0
0
ID 0 _ O O
O INI 7 : i
13'_ua!z!_tao:)N!7
0....................... , .... ,,,,,
_D
®w D
U
\ " • 7S
' E
_00 --_ ......_66o q_ I
"''"' I. tee_m_ _ 1 I
1'1:
0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 I
_ 0 0 0 _ _ N
i I I I
]3 'lu_!°E;P°OU!7
I g_,_ ,
I_- -_'"
*l ®
l 41 ' 7-
0........... t'M
I
,¢........ I I I L I I I I L I ......... I ...... i .... I I I I I L I _
d d o 0 o dI I
i¢ <0I
00 9
c<
H:)'lua!o!L_ao3 _U_LUO_Ie6U!H
©,,,,,, ................................... (,q
_oo
i i i o_-
, I I//I
_/'" r/ "2 _' "¢ _3
._, 0 2
,I ,If <
* ®
_ ?
I
,4".......................... i .................. (M
_. 0 _. _NId o d o d
I
la::) 'pJoq3 ¢'/L _,o :lUa! _!jjao_)_.uauJo_l 6u!q al!d
g
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL l 70
_0
............... l .... I .... _ ......... C)I
_oo
_6°0 q_" !Itl °r_ IMmllI, t
. i i _'
. I I
,tflTt 'li i! _t
°8
m _
' u
i
i i i _ ] i I L 11 I I l I 0
u") _ LD 0 _ 0 _ 0 U
_ d d o r-,i
1:3'_ua!ouJao:3M7
0
(N
E_
k k ,, I
• L Cq
_oo _ ir u _7
_00 q_ l
_RIIIII _ LO
I
I
'1'1: i
0 _) 0 _ 0 _ 0 I
I I I I
13 'lue[o[_JaoO }..dl
_oo
IIIO_ IlllliIllee_u@
0................. c,.I
H3 'lUa!_!;Oooluau_c_a6u!H
_q° oeoOo r_ ' [i i i_-- !
IiiiI1_ !
, i{I/I _"
•4. l T.,- / /
{ 1"
o
f',l
El
.X0
0 0
I
TsI
I1
E<
c,l
I
(D
1
[
r,,) (q _ o _. elld d o o o o
I I
I_3'DJou317/1ID_,ue!3!bao3}ua_uoFl6u.Mo],!d
3
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 71
6
0
I
riIi
-\ "-3, i
• 1
" \ i_ IJ
i.('!t_00
......IIII 0--
IIIIII _ LO
I_w_uo
i I
:I'I: 1 o'1 F
i
,,,,I,l*ll,,f_ .... I ............. _1
0 _ 0 Ln 0 ti3 0 I
_ 0 0 0 _ _I I I
(I1
r_
_Y.
_J0 D
<
I
<c,l
I
7D'lug!o!U_o_I!7
_00
llllllll
ii h• ll I£
, [///I
C'.,I
; 1_ . ==
]. CO....
<
t_
6 d o (5 o 6I I
H 3 'lua!_g_ao3 _ual.u o_ aBU!H
0' ' U ''__L.LLLL .............. [ ................. t_
r
l I I °_ (._I l l I I I __
• I I
i_IIIII I
' / O_
od,_ o 0
e_ , N
J. /." _<
_ 0
i Ii
i
_N
d o o o oI I
F)
0
I_3 'DJOLly) "Y/l _O ]ua!D!.l_aoo _ua.uol_ 6u]qo_!d
£
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL 1 72
U_
I
I
I
I
i
,I
0
;t
11
............. i .... I ......... i ....
_oo N_dSo q .N_,O_I I 107_
MNIIlltlllll
:'1 I'
, !tTh!i
l.i
d
o8
_ __
0
/f
°©
0 u3 0 tn 0 ©
0 5 r_
73 'lureotUao9lJ!7
\
l'l, J
\
_co o_
: III O--ilNilll_emw
,l,i,,,,l ........
u_ 0 u9 0
........ ,,, ,,t, ,,,',' _
_J "
!_ _ ,,_1\
\
,_ X' _ . _>_ -.
_', ', \
_ _¢ "
'_I .o,,_ i '
.@
!L .'_
I '_• I
O _ O I
0I 7 T
O_g
"13xj
U
0
I"6I
T_c-
<
13 'lure o!Jla °3 lJ!7
_oo
eOOoq_
iiio_Ilnilllemeeee
4
Y_
I,D
L(,7I,,J,
L
I
/"
'/_/ o
7,"J_
7
7
I
d d o o o dI I
a3 'luaLo{;Jao3 lu auJopla6U!H
O_
_0
0
4.-..
0
I0
<
8 II i
P3 c,I ,_.
d 6 o
0
I I I I II j l
,,_>.,41 _ <-'-----J I
/ / "_
_ I 1.1
I_ i_ ;r_ ,_ i-- I _
I
1. ")'"'f _ #
4 __ 7
0O4
I
0 K (-41
d o di i
_3 'PJ°q9 #/L l ° lUa[Ot_Ja°9 },uaLdo_i6u!40}! d
4a
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 73
0
d
70 'IU_'!3!_.J;)O0 _J!7
o......... ' .... ' .... '''' _ .... ' .... C4
"13"_ua!3!_.jao3U!q
_00
_do q_
IIIIIIIII
, I I. I I
, I/|/I K':.
/ ,
7
d d o
o
ID
"t
/
'/ o
l,"
T
oq
'iu)
'i
0
r
0 ,-:. c,IIo o d
I I
H3 ":lua!sUpo3 ;lU_WOBa6U!H
0
_oo
6ao _I I I e,
.... "1 ":'
d
U _ / //-
V.
_, , _ oI
@
1_0
.("4
, /
• LD
I _, . 'T:
I . C)
• 1
ZI1[ .... i ..................... _.,,i
r,l ,.-: o ,:. allo o o o (5
I I
_3 'PJ°q3 i_/_ _D ]us,! S!J;@o 0 _U@LUO_ 6u!q 3_! d
'Sc_1D
2(0o
.<
I
T_c-
,,'-x
¢,"0
oo
.<I0
®
c-.<
[,,,
=
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 74
_o
f......... _ 1, ......... t _F _00 !
' _ddoqN i
I I II ! H H i
L
• ,_
• $
• I I: i•• /_.
i ,'t
_t\ iII,•
I
4
! JO
F I 4
• " -I
"_ 1"_I ' ,Q_
*, o
-i L.
,0
.......... 1o0 u*) 0 0
('I
lo ':1U8!D!]IO 0 DI_!-_
0......... i ......... ' .... ' .... ' .... _1
lo 'lUO!::)!_O0{)1]?q
......... I ........
II II I I I I!
.......................... 0
ID
(Xl
i,,,,,,,, ................
_ _ od o o 0
I
I
"E ello cJI I
HD '_ua!::)!;Jao 0 luauJ0_ _6U]H
o
wOO
J_
, I i
---- I
/, /,, / / '_
.X
• U
i_ L J I
g_ t ®
G _
I
, ........................................... t'M
o d o d o dI t
i4:9 'PJ°qo _/11D :tua!D!JJa°9 )UaWOIAI6u!q Oi!d
i
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL 1 75
........... .ZZ._LL_LL............... d
,J!!i
ttttlt o
r
01i , tf
o _ o _ o _ o °
, 7 T
7_ ':_U8! 3!j;80:) :U!7
r7
_J
Uc_
nj00
o
r7
0
oCLO
wQO.c_c O.C _a£mu
£_uu
T °iqiq40_0_0_
I_lllfl_
\ ++!muu,, 0 o
<
.... _ _ _'oo
ID
7061
I
,..I ..................... _
0 _ 0 _3 0 _0 0 I
, 7 7
13 'lua!o!l_eo3 I_.!7
£_u_
q,tqiq4O_O_O_
II I I! I III lu II I, Iil II
'¢ ',¢ '0 _ 'e '0
"ll
|llt I/
(.C,
'" F
}- _oIt" (N
I
-4.
rl _ 'Z 0 _ ell
o d o o o oI I
H3 'lua!0gjao 3 luabu0RaSU]H
o,1e_o
e_o_
_u
q&q#q_
6D
u
I
; ,./
.! c,l _
©
0cq
IF I
rO ('4 ,-2, 0 _. C_Id d o o o o
I
_3 'pJoq3 _,/t I p sue! 3!jjeo O luekuo# 5u!q3_! d
J
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 76
m
,J!!_ r 1w- __oc_ o
_mum-J9.4-_,mq_q_q
i ,,,= lmo_ i C
C
e_
f :i °I i°! °
0 _ 0 _'1 0 LO 0 0
_ C) 0 0
3- T i
13 ':lug!z!JOO3l]?l
0,,,,,,,,,, .... , .... , .... i .... i .... oJ
Q
\_\D_
i @
S. U
0
--. m o
°':":=® L 1o°._m_
.-_ _ o _u
0 •_ ,-,"w ,..," Oq
.o-o-o I_ ,_ _-
O,_/Oe_ 0 NCilOlOi
_I III I II I c.__ m_uelw
un o _ o _n o _n o I
_3'_u°iz!;;a°3 U!I
H3 ':lua! 3!_iao3:ua_uOlala6U!H
"" ........... ''" ......... i ...... ,,,i,, ...... ,
0
_3 ('q "i. 0 ,-i. (_1
d d o o o oI
m3 'pJoqDi_/I )D lua!o!_lJao3 _.UaLUOl_5u!q_l!cl
=
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL l 77
.......... _ .............. ' .... 0
e.lo _
I o_o_o_
, t_!!H ot
0................... ' ......... ' .................. Oq
_Q.Oa O.c
o .c1_1 e•CI/) _ u
II_e¢ j --
®e 0 -
LO
00
O_
II
li,
1210
Jq4o.,_q_
d t'- II II U I I IQIDe®O 0
.- ,a .a ,o ,e,,e,o - 0 U
i o I_o I
C_ I c
<
! o4
' g! i '° _
..........o ............................o........)........i_ "-_, 0 _ 0 u3 '0 0 _q
1:3'_,ua!aYj803 1;! H9 ':lue_alj_le03 :waw 01t.ia6UIH
, .... , .... o ........................................ oo.,
" "'" " "S -" "S W,,,,
,,! 'k ttttrr :° "//''ti .... o:_. _ "-"O wit1 e v- O
®_ -M *, - 0 o
\ \ .... oo< o_._1 <
00_0_0_
I uu_tu,, ; I
- _,o,o_,o ,_
< II If , _-!__ <
._ m , 11tO ,tO
('4 I I1'I I
I l I I .......... .......... _ ........ ] ...... d I J .................. l _ [
I.,'1 O lb 0 l.O 0 In 0 I I'n N ,-: 0 ,-: _1
_ 0 0 0 (N 0 0 0 0 0 0
"b 'lua!3?JJa°3 IJ?-I t't3 'pJoq3 lz/[ :_D_.ua!u!J.Jao9 luewolal Bu!q::,l.!d
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 78
IIII i ............. I .............. I ........
o o o o o oI
-13 'tua!o[tjao3 tJ!] I"13'P-I°Ul3_/l1° tua!::)YJa°3luew°i_Bu!qal!d
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL l 79
)
)
%
"i ....d
0
chU
E
c3C,l
a)0
0
20
0
J
m_q_j_wO
a4c4o4
llllll
h Iq ---- m
i
I
r
u_ 0 u_ 0
0 L) 0t 7
,,, .,I 0
u_ o u_ o ° _ c_ ,- o _
_ 7 (NI (5 d o c; ol
_D':lUalaq#ao3Uq HD '_uala[jJao0 :luauJopta6ulH
u3
......................... ,.... ,.... o ................................................ o ,0r
N,
O _ O
0 O 0
I
q#q@o@
IIIIIII
_''fl
l_ill
L;\J.
0 _ 0 i
T T _
®'_ 121
v
2_
0 0
I
c-<
("4
m_o_
- _--OO_O_-
mdm _"J_;
':11 1
' ,f° oO
T _5_ Nq)
g _I
,q......... ,111 ............................... _
F_ N 'C, 0 ,--: owl0 C) 0 O 0 0
] 1
-19':lUa!a!Jtao3U!7 M3 'pJoq3_/_ _D}ua!3:jjao3 _uaLuo_6_!qo_!d
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 80
u3
a
e- -_o
OlOlOl
LL,,,Joeee
I
tq
0
,/
0 _ 0 bO 0 C_
d d 0T T ,
oL)
E
u
0C)
Oso
r_
qD ']ua!z'j,lao3 ]j)-)
0
!Q.
imm_ l.,dFllI:
e
x
moo/I
gelS-
_-_u_
)cn:_ J
#_ ___.s
dlold_
_]I III I I
c_
k -•, b\
_,,
• " _ I_I
0o4I
I Iii,II ;,i, i ................. CX_
, T T ,
_0
.X
063 o
L
¢)
c<
('4
']3 'lua?3Ula°3 IJ!-7
a3 '_uo)o!_O00luaumff a6U!H
d
_, o4
/
¢)m?-
.X
t)
[ <
°oo,_ I "6e_e o -
.£la u u _' n'l q.1
_, ,-_ °--u_.,, --o--,o _
_mu,..c,_ = <
-0 -o -C
61010))I llllli
ttt!rr,
d o o o ot I
kl3'pJo43 i_/I l Dlua!%_le°3 luaw°_ 6u)q:::'l)d
z
i
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 81
........... ,,,[ .... , .... ; .... n .... Jd
_j.,'!e_o •'_'
_nl:j -w
• ,_9 _- .,,-
I
H"++II
/I ---- II
,' ,_iJ
I , , 'Z.
/' oo m o ,.n o Lo o u
_ _ d o dl 7 7 i
o
C
_J
o mO
(3O',
2o
0......... ,,,,,, .... i .... I .... I'''' t'M
o_
_cf_ e v
mcla_ -g_ C'4
I -- c'- -wO
=-6,9.._-
'-- o4Oiqi
I
' !\
b o,I e4
I
O _ O _ O _3 O I
,- _ O O 0 _N, *F 7
_0
_r q3
0O o
4-,
I
c"
<
30 '::lUa!::)!J}a°_) lJ!]
................... , ......... , ......... , ......... 0
_e_ ' I Io_m_ue
_UU{.__o_- r
_'_'_ _
q_q_q_ r0_0_0_
I_11111
_ ol
''11
tt!!rr [ :
; ,Z/ '
I
_ K O _ N I
o d o o o oI I
H3 ':lUala!_.ja03 :luaLu0_aBu!H
O''"'""'" "'"''""' ..... ' ......... *"''"" (N
/9_ _
!
/
,.,:_ ,,_ _:
=*._, ,,,,7,u._-_ u- _ \_ 0
® e 4_Wo m,_n [#.J
._ .IN .."w ---- i L
l II lllll
eevm_m
tt!!irf;
I
,,,i,l,l,i ................................... _1
F) e.,I ,. O _\ _NIo o o 0 o o
t
a9'P_°q3t,/_.)DSua!aUj.a031.uawo/_6uNat!cl
A
"13
v
oO
<
oI
"O
'.JO
I
<
{
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 82
..... 1 .... I ........................
1.1") 0 © 0 _ 0 _ 0 I
_ o d o; 'i 7 ;
_D ':+uaF:'gP°O ++1!1 _O 'pJo401_/l10 ?ua!_!_4a°O_.uowo_ buN g_,!d
NAS A/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL 1 83
, ......... _l .... i .... i I....
• .,soo _ o_o,i[lo I
iI_,Ini i -r II,_.. I'T 0
c
.__
: dE
qq_N_,ool r_.
mlmlo
(lid
l,/f/_,/-It
, /I/ _.
r
0
. i- i¢ d
_'
..... 0 i
_ '0 _ _" _ _ 0 _ _ I
73 _ HO ':lUanogJao0_u_wol,'i_6U_H
O
//\)
\
ffl
©, ........ , ......... , .................. 1 ......... i('-4
'X //\ _1 #
L_n i
oo2_
l'_I I
, l , [ .... I ........... , .... I .... _ ........................................... '
o _ o _ o _ oi m _ _ o _ _o o o _ o d o o o 0
, 7 7 , I ,
mIg
&
20 'IUB!_g;BO3:U?I a8 'pJoq3t,/[ ;o ]ua,!3?Uao0 ].uaLuob!6u?q3){cl
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL l 84
aBl!
T -- t _°II -i, ._o
I / 11 U
i I" °_
0
I ' °
,,,, ........ ,, ,,,,I .... 0
u3 o © o Ln o tn O_J_ 6 d o _ _
%) ':lUO!3!_,JO03 1_!7
i,
&,\
o_1 lb.
i l >>>>Q<_ . .• ,o r_N
0611-.
"iltf!! r
x_
\\
k_
\
\,wC]
0
kO
(N
_0
_D
Y<
I
8I
o _ o _ o _ o I_ 6 o d
10'lUa!a!Jtao3I,_!-t
°_"'0"_ / t_->>1
III I I I "' / J
'_ I _" 00{f!!ir_, [ oo,
. L _ZWH F oj
"_/r °II i
_ 7
_ 8
° I 'F) CN _ 0 _ NId d o o o d
I 1
143 'lUa!0L,gao3 luauJopl aGu]H
o
//
_lli // _I o,i
t,
" 1
t
_N
I
I.oS
16 >> IXi ,.,; _i ri
tt_.
_q.,4,Ij
F) e4 'C 0 _. c4 1o 6 o o o o
I I
_13 'pJoqo #/L ]o l_ua!3!lJao0 t.ueLtJOl_I 6U!qOl M
130
'SI#
OC) O
I00 _e
c-
e4
7{,O
T
[,i
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOLI 85
: r
i
1
t
'It Io , I..
I !
i i
'"' Ifn,F
)
1_ O I..3 O
_ O O.
O
1.0
,.qO
I
'"", I t i°
,, .,.I .... O
0 _ 0 0
0 (N
, T 7
E)
[J
£0
0e4 __
0
£3
f3
0................... ' .... ' .... ''''' (%1
r,I
i
\
i|.,}_
ooN_i#
iiiiiim._.ol
''tl+{!?rrjiAIla,,I
O
i i
\
\.\\ ",,
\
O
d 0
'-D
(N
%
%
..,t.ii
IA
O
I
"B".,t "13
00 0
-2
m _
<
i
121
e,l
I
0 in 0 I
I
70 ':lUa[O!]jao3:lJ!-]
d
0
......... I ......... i ......... i ......... i ......... ("4
II
¢
$
II ....-.oo_N
_llllll_oeo*
"IL
t!!r III • _,-
! 0
$ • oo[ =<
, <e,l
I U)
I
I
(N ,_ 0 "i, [NI
6 o o o d
H3 'lue!agO03 _,uaw01ala6u!H
0.... T.... , ......... ,,, ....... i ......... i ......... (N
_D
C,I
,_,iI
_,", # 4
'TZZIII I
,+++,
I)
"D
,I"_' 1 02
,, L ,, I
I
_D
1
I
_0 N ,- 0 ,-': C,II
o d o o o dI I
_3 'PJ°q3 t7/l :tc']-ua!a!#JaoO_.uaLuo_6u!q3).!d
8
e_
"!.
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 86
oill..II|l|l
,' I II
m _I If
T' 'i .........
/
l ! /'t i '_'
o
d
o
o
0 _ 0 u3 0 0
o _q, ? T ,
o
[-
i UIC-I
6 _-0
0
C_
121
r #
|
4m
la
\\
iiii ii .....
0 _ 0
_ 0 0
GO
E_@
Y
li c_ o
,t I
K
I I II <e,I
1 e4
.............. t'N
0 _ 0 I
0 _1, ? ?
13 ']u_!o!llooO :lJ!-t
6
......... I .........
_STT_i.>>ll
ea_g_W_i,..illllli11111
"11
ii¢.
ii.I
o
I,D
! 0
_ T zF ;t, iI/
,_<
, (NI
I
I tO
I
I
,,,, ....................................... f'4
d o d o dI I
Ho '_US!D!JJaO 3 IU_O_ 06u!H
o
_D
C_
i _ -_
'1_ I
f::>>
P': _ F
:ftt" ;
/[/-
1
/I °
?0
<N
I
O_ _ 0 'C ell
0 o o o o dI I
OO
,,-xo_II
¢00 ID
I"6I
_0 __
c"
<N
?
¢13'PJOq3 _/i }D ]:ua!3yjao O].UaLUOH 6u!qol] d
]
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 87
..........._ .....7 ........
J Ir 0
I _..N_I III
I +l!!ii-i,....°o
ilt -
T d;M f o
I II
U'3 0 U3 0 L_ 0 _3 0 0
d d d
7_ '_UO!OyjOO 0 U!7
0
0
(D
Ln
o I Ii.
II'))
>>OR_N
I I I I III
''II
,e!rr...I .... I ........ , ..........
O _ O _ O _ O I
0 0 0
u
\ _ ' oo\ '1
10 'lue!o!_Je00 _!l
o
._-_030 ---_o_-oo
l_>> I I
_._..
I'"'|
_ m
''11 _ / T
0
t TL! 0
d 0 c o o d
H 0 'lua!o[llaoo }uamo H a6U!H
O
Eli
// / /gr
_._ b
,,,, ¢ 7, [./1
%: I ( ogI
_ K 0 _ NI0 0 0 C) 0 C)
I I
H3 'PJOqO 1_/L 10 ]-ua! 3Y.'la°3 }uaw°l/l 6u!qal!d
"¢ ]3
.X
(J0 o
<
I
I a,C
<c_
7
e!,
NASAICR--2000-20992 I/VOL1 88
E
I T T i
I
iI
©
m _
C
u('W _:
d_0
I 04 II
O_
/ °
0
\\
|
\
\
1
@
E _ i a a
\ , • ,_
_-oo '
i a - ->_ />>Qq..
I I I I I II
• ' 0
I • I
0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 1
_ 0 0 0
7g 'lU_p!_@03 I_.!7
......... I .... ," .............. ' ......... ' .........
ddll._| I | _ |eelo_e
"tl
ttt r
8
,'- e _ m
/ r
I 0
,L oo
I
<e,l
ID
I
8I
'7 0 ,-7 _NI
d o o o dI I
H3 ':lua!zwlao 3 luawol_ a6U!H
0
©
P
/ /
Dill
II_II
tII '
'°ttII
// /
/-
J
/
t'N
o d o o o dI I
m3 'PJ°4_) 17/i I° l,Ua!gYJa°3 1-uaw°lal 6u!q 31!d
OO
'B'lJ
,.,_z
,<4- I
_J
£<
Cq
Tl.O
T
¢I
,m
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 89
IJ
!
113
.... 'I _ <:5
.j: i
. _oI.- v u
•i:. el Ii :+a ;ll,++..i
I+ooNrld o N N _:,,,;
_I llil I• ..+ t tO_m,o m +o
; + 0
+1++°___L o
+.r-
.__
/1! U
¢ d;0
l/ 1_ C_
,.+, ,.+ i ...... ,,+, 0
0 _ 0 u3 0 IC) 0 0
0 0 0
I T 7- I
0_+,,, .... , .... . .... ,,,,,i .... i T'''
v\
\
0 0 r_,,*i4
t11111
++.+iiIn 0
r- _
•
\
\
U
\, '\\ _ <
0 _ 0 _ 0 [
0 0 0
13 ':lual3uJa o3 tj!7
,_,_ ................................... 4°
! "l . 4o +
' ; '-'+ I Iml
_, ,_ ._ o ,e I
_'-,'++"t'+>or<+++4 -- --J_-- _ J C+4+dl l--
l l lt,,il it _"il O0
¢ +_ X(I l o
_" I oo' I+++, ? •
[ ,
il !l C",t
¢r_ _ i
I
d o o o o dI I
H3 'luaj3!l:laO3 lUaWOlfl a6u!H
................... , ......... ,,,+, .... ,_ ......... 0
;I / ///
q_
H2_
a r o _o
& 'ir+,+, il _ l i +6
,6_ . x _ I
;++:++"" t ?<"
!tf I +_ e4
I
o o o o o dI I
Vt3 'pJoq3 #/[ _D].ua! 3[j.jao3 lUeLUOI_6u!qo],!d
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 90
_r
__1__ ""o
u o_- _ 0_-
oolf_iiiilll
l[ " ' ;"_ o+++;Itq i:,
/ ,Ii._/ i
ku I
I' t
/!
d
_ o d d c_t 7 7
19 '_ua!m!;}aoo_j!q
U
E@
UO4
d_0(J
oLE3
0, ,, ,TI,,,I,= ,, F................. 1,
o._
I\ ",
_t
°1 _,o \
"..... 55"l/ill/
('t
O0
¢,
rJO
?
.<
Lo
I
(304
I
0 _ 0 _ 0 e 0 I
_ o o d
70 'tua[o!_Ja°0 lJ!7
iiiiii
..... /// tmm
.... • d_ .-.oo_
00.... _' ._j •/
'_ / //N
# g. [H
- [
iI
I
2
.......................................... (M
0,1 ,-. 0 _ (-41d d o d o 0
I I
H D '_uo!D!jJao 0 _uawo R o6U!H
O0
,ux3
v
00 0
<
T:¢
II
<ol
7_D
7
(2,...... • .......................................... t'M
//
, 1
' t.,; w@
,.s 1
, Z./
t'N
I13
v
.xO
O O
<,t I
t_
gl
E<
C,I
I
T0c_I
tO N "7 O .: _ Id d o 0 o d
I I
a0 'Pmq3 I_/l :ID ]-ua!°!;Ja°3 _.uawo_6u!qo_4d
NASA/CR--.000-.099. I/VOL 1 91
........... _ ............... .-4.,,,.a
I
.=8,-.°
_m c'..• ,dON_
I I II I I
0
i_ i r_l
£II _11rl .--
uol'% d _-
; 0t 0
!
:a_( ,I
,i x \ _II/
'II
_ 0
0
0 if} 0 _ 0 0
0 0 0,1, i 3
1_)'lua!og;ao3 _J!7
0..... , .... , .... , .... , .... I .... i .... (%1
_9
C_
\\
__J__\,q
uo
I
?
<
I
8f
i_ 0 _ 0 _ 0 i10 0 I
_ d o o 4I 7 7
13']ua!0!;JaooU!7
tO
0
0.......................... ,......... , ......... (%_
.5 1
_,-" o q"t,
I I I I I I
_D
I 0
$ • o o
f I
8
e,t _ o ,-[. D41o o 6 o 6
I
H3 'lua!o!_jaoo }uawo_ e6U!H
0................... . ......... : ......... 1 ......... 0"4
_D
°/;°jr11 r_ ._ "¢
f
,, .¢ i
) I.'-" _ _ ,/_" _
5-0c,4
I
F) _1 _. 0 _ e,I I0 0 0 0 0 0
I t
_13'P_Oq317/l _ }ua!3!:IJaO3 }uauuo#6u!q3l!d
-!.]
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 92
i .........ooIt,
I
&
I
_ [F
i! '
I_ rq
I I I
It "-- I
btl
_''I j
I I/
_ 0" 1
/
I
I
¢3
0 tO 0 _ 0 LO 0 0
- _ d d 0 _N, 7 7 ,
,,.-,
o
4-'E
U
O4 '_
0
r.j
C3
0
[{
\
\Z. ._&:
_.d_l
O011.. I_11111
i _ ,
\'..
\\
J
................ C_
LD 0 _ 0 LO 0 _ 0 I
o_
v
(D
0 0
_0 _
<C4
(D
T
0
04
o
1 _-.c_-._e
OOl i..i i I I I
°'/I/&; 'l V _ _0tt tf _I ./ u
_ 7Z' ]r °,
_ e,l <
-_ ?{ TcD
T
0('4
I
_ : o ,_. 041d d o d o d
I I
H3 'lUa!O!llao3 _uaLuo_ a6U!H
o
O4
/t °/" 'S
"_ f r _E
7
©
I
O4 _ o _. 041o c_ o o o o
I I
_O 'PJ°qO _'/I _0 lUa]a!jjaoo lUaLUO_ bu!qot!d
8
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 93
r
I
ii
Lll ,,
Lf) 0
I.z
_c _r,ddc_ _44
11_I"-"i
$_IQ_ t
<
E
c_ o oI
" rl .......jdI ; .j
It 1-i
I I 4_rj
4
4C)
V -4E
I I 4 0
/ i _
i
i, 1i/ ,=
ili' t °
' 1!
i
,,: ........ q0 _ 0 0
J
7_)'_lUa!O!;jao_ I_!7
f\
\
III IIII
\L L
\"
i I_
0
LD
D_I
{I]
0
a 3
_s
<
T
o
0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 1
o o d
_3'lua!_!_P°3_;!7
..oo_NOONN_
iiiiii
J
JI,m
r,, // ,., /I
1
0
O4
C'4
00 O
<_- I
I
E
<C'4
5
5-
I
0 d o d o d
HD 'lua!_!_jaoO luaLuol_ a6ujH
0
/• //
//
I
-- t
m"'.. /• -_ I _,
I
iiiiiii ....................................
o d o O o dI I
M3'P_°43_'/l _o},ua!o!_.jao3 _,uewol_6uN at!d
"O
_Y
C)
<I
I
¢-
<
J
i
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOLI 94
aolf_
IIIIII
i 0L Ii
l"ii=* ;,,1 I I H
/' _ _i
I ,tl ",,
..... ,, ,, ......... O
0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 0
l "_ 7 ,
,q
0
c-Q)
U
00
0",
SC3
O
,,,,n .... r .... I .... I''''1 .... i .... (N
\ °t
_._;_
i ,_ I 8
i I
0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 I
o o o d,.n
73 ':1u_,?o!;_aoOIJ!7
.................
(D
/1 .#• o ur3
r °
<o4
I
l I I I I
+f++iiU
#
II
"/
©c,l
I
_N '- 0 _. c_l
6 o d o 6I I
H3 '1UB!m!:IJaO 3 ]uawo_l a6u!H
o
- ///
//
, E,-"
;a_:o'_.¶ ' Jl_, ".'_ i .._ /
III' S
(N
/- 0
2_
uO o
o
,e t
I
C-
<
7_D
?
O
I
,¢
0 0 0 0 0 0I I
_3 'P_°qOt/_ I_ lua!_!J.J.a°:3_uaw°IN6u!q°1!d
"i
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL 1 95
.... , .... , .... j .... j .... T .... , ....
@m _ o
i1_ @ (1w_ cL o
r4c4c_ • .,I-_-I I I OQ_-I fill Iltll I
_d
" 'Hl l
ttttt_ _'r-
U
i_O
r °Ik
T _! ° f ii c
0 _3 0 _ 0 LO 0 0
_ d d oT T r
70 'lug,!o!lJeo9:1_!1
0......... , .... , .... , .... i .... , .... C'xl
l\tk
\
eg
gge _
IIiiiiiiugeele
"' It
i
k =\
\\
!
O I
0 _ O _ 0 I
0 0 o,I
T T ,
CO
@
0
0 0
<
<
lO ':1ua!_!:Uooo:U!I
0
Ill
1/ "/"
" '//11 #/
!tttt 'r ",,,, "g
0
7 _J .e I
_ I
I
,i ........... ,,,,,,. , ......................... p4
e_ _. o _. _1
d o o d o dI I
H3 'lua!oypo 3 ]uawol_ aBU!H
................... . ......... . ......... , ....... ,, (_0
,I I /
FII /
L _' 1 "-"
.x
• " _ T4ll!', ' I oI'N_j
°°"'' t <7°'-li' i _ll c-
"'"" 't, ,<
li ('Xl
t7i t_ t
i T
/ oC_
d ,5 o o o dI I
I13 'pJoq3 t/| 1D lUa! 3[tJeOO )_uaw°l_ Bu]q g')'!d
i
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL l 96
10 ';ua{o!jJaO3 ilJ]l
_0
o
U3
0
1
uI "9 ;.z
0
L o
_ .
-©I "
"0
_ 0 0
7 _I
\_., X
t\
\"_5 w
I f I00_
;1111111W IJ e © IJ I_ If,0,10 io .o ,,,ele _e
!!!ttTT
I
\
\\ \ ',
\ *
_1 0 tll 0 _ 0 _0 0 I
_ o o o {'47 T
0O4
CO
m (3
L)(3 0
r I
I c
I
)
7
10'_ua!zgpo3 U!I
o
I I I I I
fl I O1
v
II "_ 0 0
, ? 7
T °
' /I _i _<c
7#
,_ O4 'Z 0 "2, [NI
O 6 o d o dI I
H 3 ':lUa!3!#J_O 31UaUJOl_l a6U!H
O,,,,,,H, .... ,,,,,, .......... ,H .... ,,,, ........ Cx[
k
0 0 0 0 0I
_O 'PJ°43 _'/_ Io _.ua!a!jjao 3 luaw01_ 6uj431! d
&
{
}
NASA/CR--2000-209921 ]VOL 1 97
LI3
_0
.''''1 ....... I .... I .............. 0
oo _
IIK_
_oo_'! _.
lllIIll
l 1'I
_r oI
J _t1
! "¢-
.__U
_ _q E
I o
, °L..C_ [3
1 0
J
--0
0 _ 0 L,q 0 _ 0 0
d d d c4r ? ? l
73 'luo! o!).I_o3 IJ!7
0..... ,,, ,,,,, .... , .... , .... , ....
i iI
" "S,[ I, \ m
k
_ _. I
I I 100.* [ I_lI;I IIIII
'0"0 "0 '0 '_ '0 '0 I
0'* _1 gI
0 tn 0 u3 0 _ ol
0 0 0
l ' Ual31 eO il
0
i ilOe_-
H3 'lua!3hUa03 )uoLuo H o6U!H
0..... "" .............................. '"" ("4
•_ oI IIi ii
\
l
II
.- j;°.x
0
. _,) I ,C/ <
_ ;_ ?
0N
I
0 0 0 0 0
I I
_3 'PJ°qO #/[ ;o _ua!3!)lJa00 _.UOLIJO_ 6u!q3_td
E:
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 98
7 'uaon _o _17
,,,, .............
Ti _,L
-\\
oo
IIIIIII_
''' II
o _ o
_ o o oI
*..............liOU
r_C_
"_ _ "I3
\
L_
4 m_*
In c_<
Oc,l
I
.......... c_
o _ o I
70 ']ua! a!;;aoO_J!-i
Ill il
'*IIII
!!IIi_g!
!
-//
d
1./
o
ID
P4
d
0I
r-
<e,l
5-
_D
7
O
I
,LI,,,,, IL,,_ .............. I, ............... f_l
0 _. _Jd o 0 o d
I t
_8 '_ua!al;_a°3]uauso_ a6U!H
oI ''_'''''*' ......... '' ........... " ....... _ ...... 04
iI ''i- ,r." ©
/
J i °
' I iI
_D
7
1 gI
i i I _ I i i I0 ......... I ............................ _
o o o o o dI I
_O 'pJOq:) _/[ ID lua! 3!},IgO 3 :].UaLUO_ 6u!qOl!d
NAS A/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 99
............. I ................
TII
0 _ 0 LF]
0 0 0I
e_,_qQ_4I I oo_
I
I IIIII iin _i
f
" II
11tiI
t 'I
O
0
E
U
OU
e4 O
0
d
O
O _ O C_
T 7 _I
I ' LIalOI g0 F I3 _ . ._ 31_
a
k
k
\I
I IO0-_IIIIII I_
'' II
O It) O
O C_ 0
II
I,!
_" "a
uO o
<
I
I c_E<
N
tO
o
........ o,J
0 tO 0
7 7 _I
IIIIIIuleeee
'/tll
'!tt lL
i
.l
: 1d
,]1 J
j T' I
5-
8I
i ........... , ............. i ......... ,_,,111,1 [M
d d o c o dI I
_3 'lua!ogJao3 :lUaWO_a6u!H
O
_0
O_
OO O
,<
O
I
r
_N
5-
ii iii
II
II
i/
O
O O
i
er
w
I
........ i ......
0 0
I ........
¢
I
T
0c,I
0o
O0 o
,<
r-<
P4
T(D
7
8I
O O1 I
I_3'p_o43 t,/l ID_ue!z!_eo3_uewo_ Bu!qol!d
NASA/CR--2000-20992 I/VOL 1 100
.............. _ .... [ ....... , .....
_o ' "
I I oo--I II II I fl
''1111
..... ttttTl
I •
I
t ,I
0
_QqT_ioo_-
- _ 5 d
"Itll
' !tttlI ,,' / r® ,L_ _ 1
/
, o _ ÷I| u' o, ji to .1I
, _ _ I_r o
i ° 0
I
0 _3 0 d _ N _Z 0 ,_. e41
o _ o 6 o 0 o dI 7" T I I ]
q3qua!g!;J_O3_!q
l \
& m
\/
E _ •
_qq44I100_
Iltlll_
II
0 _ 0
_ d o dI
I
©
_D
0C
<
I
E
<
I
0 _ 0 i
70 '_ua!0!;;a03 1_!7
H3 ')ua!3!l_ao 0 ]UaLUOI_ a6U!H
(12
A
_t "O
(JO O
+.,
I
_0__
c-
<('4
T
3-
O,,,,, .... , .... , .... _ ...... ,,,[,,,, .... '|_"''"" ("4
Etw_£ q 4 .,;
I II I
I
..l
" I
II?
g'¢ 13
U0
•e I
_5I
<O4
?
?
0
:---I "t
o d o 0 o O
_3 'PJOqO _/{ _D "J.Ug!3!_,JO0 0 _.US'LIJO_ 6u!q31!d
i
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL l l 01
i
I
I
'Ii
r
'Ii
11
_ i 1
ii , ,
i _ ,,i i
II
' /!I
4
i,,, ,,ill
13 qua!e!J, JOO31;!7
o......... _ .... , .... i ......... , .... (N
/ \
I
\
\\
\
J \
._._
lo_lor
[IIIIII
" _'-_-'_,,,
I
, \
0 u3 0 _0 C'
0 0 0 7
\
_N
I..-
@"_ "D
v
O
4-,
<f,l
m
/, 7
I
T _I
"13'1uatz!_po3IJ!3
;6 _4:_o.4
I0 -lOe
I I II II
_l'|lll
t tt?'
R
d 6 o
/
/
J_
r/ "-"0
A J, a 0 or
o _. ell0 0 d
I I
H3 'lua!o!;jao 3 ]uauJo_ o6U!H
: /. /
• _ II
' I I
t
• _
I
lllIlll,_,_ I I
' ' [} _l
r,: _@,'- _1
_0 e4 'Z.
0 0 0
O0
c_@
v
(J
0 0
oI0
¢-
<[N
T
T
o
o ,1z. _Io o o
I I
_O'P°qo _/1ID1.ua!°!JJ.a°O_uauJ°l_6u!q31!d
8
{!
NASA/CR--2000-209921/VOL 1 102
Form ApprovedREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEOMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for 1his collection of informationis estimated to average 1 hour per response, includingthe time for reviewinginstructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of informalion. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of thiscollection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Direclorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 JeffersonDavis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3, REPORT TYPE AND DATES cOVERED
September 2000 Final Contractor Report
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS
DHC-6 Twin Otter Tailplane Airfoil Section Testing in the Ohio State University
7x10 Wind Tunnel
6. AUTHOR(S)
Dale Hiitner, Michael McKee, Karine La Nor, and Gerald Gregorek
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
Ohio State University Research Foundation
1960 Kenny Road
Columbus, Ohio 43210-1063
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
Cleveland, Ohio 44135-3191
WU-548-21-23--00
NAG3-1574
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
REPORT NUMBER
E-12159-1
10. SPONSORING/MONITORINGAGENCY REPORT NUMBER
NASA CR--2000-209921 -VOL1
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Project Manager, Thomas Ratvasky, Turbomachinery and Propulsion Systems Division, NASA Glenn Research Center,
organization code 5840, (216) 433-3905.
12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Unclassified - Unlimited
Subject Categories: 02 and 05 Distribution: Nonstandard
This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, (301) 621-0390.
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
13, ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)
Ice contaminated tailplane stall (ICTS) has been found to be responsible for 16 accidents with 139 fatalities over the last three decades, and is suspected
to have played a role in other accidents and incidents. The need for fundamental research in this area has been recognized at three international[
conferences sponsored by the FAA since 1991. In order to conduct such research, a joint NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program was formed in t994: the
Ohio State University has played an important role in this effort. The program employs icing tunnel testing, dry wind tunnel testing, flight test.,ng, and
analysis using a six-degrees-of-freedom computer code tailored to this problem. A central goal is to quantify the effect of tailplane icing on mrcraft
stability and control to aid in the analysis of flight test procedures to identify aircraft susceptibility to ICTS. This report contains the results ot testing of
a full scale 2D model of a tailplane section of NASA's Icing Research Aircraft, with and without ice shapes, in an Ohio State University 7×10 Low
Speed wind tunnel in 1994. The results have been integrated into a comprehensive database of aerodynamic coefficients and stability and control
derivatives that will permit detailed analysis of flight test results with the analytical computer program. The testing encompassed a full range of angles
of attack and elevator deflections, as well as two velocities to evaluate Reynolds number effects. Lift, drag, pitching moment, and hinge moment
coefficients were obtained. In addition, instrumentation for use during flight testing was verified to be effective, all components showing acceptable
fidelity. Comparison of clean and iced airfoil results show the ice shapes causing a significant decrease in the magnitude of CLmax (from -1.., to -0.64)
and associated stall angle (from -18.60 to -8.2°). Furthermore, the ice shapes caused an increase in hinge moment coefficient of approximatel v 0.02, the
change being markedly abrupt for one of the ice shapes. A noticeable effect of elevator deflection is that magnitude of the stall angle is decrea,;ed for
negative (upward) elevator deflections. All these result are consistent with observed tailplane phenomena, and constitute an effective set of data for
comprehensive analysis of ICTS.
14. SUBJECT TERMS
Aircraft icing; Tailplane icing; Airfoil performance
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATIONOF REPORT
Unclassified
18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATIONOF THIS PAGE
Unclassified
19. SECURITY CLASSIRCATIONOF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
15. NUMBER OF PAGES
112
16. PRICE CODE
AQO20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39- ! 8298-102