Development is one of the greatest paradoxes. It creates haves as well as haves-not. Under development is an inevitable by-product of development. Does it justify the Socialist principles and the Marxist ideology? Why, then we did not moved to a more leftist economy? I think the answer lies in our ideology and the collective conscience of the Indian society. Indian society traditionally granted a goddess status to money in the society. The four varnas have different economic needs which makes equality in strict sense an obsolete idea. It does prescribes social responsibility to the richer classes in the form of good Karma. But you see the Indian Gods, Lord Krishna sitting in his golden chariot driven by four horses wearing inexpensive gems and ornaments discourses on renunciation! The Indian society is not anti money.. iT believes in growth, but. i.e dharma