development and human factors analysis of neuronavigation vs. augmented reality a. pandya 1,2, m.r....

8
Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2 , M.R. Siadat 3 , G. Auner 1,2 , M. Kalash 1 , R.D. Ellis 2 [email protected] 1 Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, 2 Biomedical Engineering Department 3 Computer Science Department Wayne State University Detroit, Mi.

Post on 21-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2 apandya@ece.eng.wayne.edu

Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality

A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2

 [email protected]

1 Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, 2 Biomedical Engineering Department

3 Computer Science DepartmentWayne State University

Detroit, Mi.

Page 2: Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2 apandya@ece.eng.wayne.edu

Augmented Reality (AR) VS

Neuronavigation (VR)

Research Question:

Does AR offer any Advantages over VR?

Page 3: Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2 apandya@ece.eng.wayne.edu

Augmented Reality Vs. Neuronavigation

(Its not enough to develop technology, we must test it.)

Augmented Reality

Neuronavigation (VR)

Movie

Page 4: Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2 apandya@ece.eng.wayne.edu

Client-Server Implementation

TrackedVideo

Stream

3D Models or Sensor

Data

Robotic Kinematic

Server

Object Registration

Software

Image GuidanceClients

Augmented RealityClients

Camera Calibration

Data

Robotic Hardware

Mounted Camera System

Page 5: Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2 apandya@ece.eng.wayne.edu

Real-time Augmentation of Objects in a Phantom Skull

Page 6: Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2 apandya@ece.eng.wayne.edu

Number of Errors AR vs. NNError Comparison

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21

Subject Number

Nu

mb

er

of

Err

ors

Errors in NN

Errors in AR

Average STD P value

AR 1.04 1.020.06846

NN 1.71 1.27

Page 7: Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2 apandya@ece.eng.wayne.edu

AR Takes Less Time Time Comparison

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21

Subject Number

Tim

e T

ak

en

(m

in)

Time for NN

Time for AR

Average STD P value

AR 5.38 2.740.00013

NN 8.47 1.90

Page 8: Development and Human Factors Analysis of Neuronavigation vs. Augmented Reality A. Pandya 1,2, M.R. Siadat 3, G. Auner 1,2, M. Kalash 1, R.D. Ellis 2 apandya@ece.eng.wayne.edu

Summary: Implementation of a prototype augmented robotics. Performed a verification study of system accuracy. Implemented a Neuronavigation system. Performed a verification study of the system accuracy. 21 Subjects study to determine performance

enhancements of AR vs. Neuronavigation

Future Work: Expand the HF study to include more complex

procedures. Implement AR on active medical robotic Investigate the use of registered sensors. Investigate the use of 3D ultrasound with AR.

It is not enough to develop technology, it must be tested for performance enhancement with the end-user in mind.