development and evaluation of website to check instructional design based on the arcs motivation...
TRANSCRIPT
Development and evaluation of Development and evaluation of Website to check instructional Website to check instructional
design based on the ARCS design based on the ARCS Motivation ModelMotivation Model
Reporter: Chen, Wan-Yi
日期 : 2006/ 5/ 22
Song, S. H. & Keller, J. M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(2), 5-22.
CSL 2
Computer mediatedComputer mediated
• Students will no longer be as excited by these novel features, and it then will become more of a challenge to stimulate and sustain their motivation during computer-mediated instruction
• Student motivation to learn is disregarded or assumed to be embedded in the cognitively adaptive CAI
CSL 3
Computer mediatedComputer mediated
• Design and development of motivating CAI– The computer-feature approach– Principle-seeking approach, in which
prescriptive motivational design principles and tactics for CAI are identified or developed from diverse theoretical and practical perspectives
– Model-establishing approach
• The CAI should provide the most appropriate motivational strategies in terms of purpose, type, and amount
CSL 4
ARCS modelARCS model
• ARCS model is useful for instructional designers– It helps one understand the construct of
motivation in terms of four distinct categories– It provides the systematic motivational design
process– It provides motivational strategies
CSL 5
ARCS & WlodkowskiARCS & Wlodkowski• Both are well-published holistic models of
motivational design
• Different– Strategy selection in the ARCS model is done
systematically from a set of categories and subcategories based on comprehensive synthesis of concepts and theories in human motivation
– ARCS model is a problem-solving approach
• Learner analysis is a key challenge
CSL 6
PurposePurpose
• The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness, efficiency, and appeal of motivationally
• Three key areas
– Attention
– Relevance
– confidence
CSL 7
MethodMethod• Participants and design
– 60 tenth-grade students from the Developmental Research School
• Treatments– Motivationally adaptive CAI– Motivationally saturated CAI– Motivationally minimized CAI
• Instruments– Motivation was measured by a simplified version
of Keller’s IMMS
CSL 8
ResultsResults• Motivation
– Overall motivation scores revealed a significant difference for the treatments
– Students in the motivationally adaptive CAI showed higher motivation than those in both motivationally saturated and motivationally minimized
• Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction– Differences occurred only for attention and relevance
– Showed higher attention than those in both motivationally saturated and motivationally minimized
– Students in the motivationally adaptive CAI showed higher relevance than those in motivationally saturated CAI
CSL 9
ResultsResults• Effectiveness
– The results showed a significant difference for the treatments
• Continuing motivation– Although the students in the motivationally adapti
ve CAI showed higher self-reported continuing motivation
• Efficiency– The correlation coefficient between science score a
nd the efficiency measure was significiant
CSL 10
DiscussionDiscussion• Motivationally adaptive CAI was superior to the
other two CAI types for the enhancement of overall motivation and attention
• Confidence and satisfaction, although students in the motivationally adaptive CAI showed the highest scores, significant differences were not found among three CAI type
• Saturated CAI provided and distributed throughout the instruction
• Students had to be exposed to much more material than those who received
• No differences in confidence among the three conditions
CSL 11
ConclusionConclusion
• The results demonstrate that it is feasible to design motivationally adaptive instruction for a self-paced learning setting such as CAI
• Self-reports of motivation can be valid indicators of learning readiness to which motivational strategies are adaptively prescribed