development administration chapter 1 dan 2 (unpas 2012)
TRANSCRIPT
Prof. Ginandjar Kartasasmita
Program Doktor Bidang Ilmu SosialUniversitas Pasundan
Bandung2012
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IS A SPECIESBELONGING TO THE GENUSADMINISTRATION, WHICH GENUS IN TURNBELONGS TO A FAMILY WHICH WE MAYCALL COOPERATIVE HUMAN ACTION
(WALDO, 1955)
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IS A SPECIESBELONGING TO THE GENUSADMINISTRATION, WHICH GENUS IN TURNBELONGS TO A FAMILY WHICH WE MAYCALL COOPERATIVE HUMAN ACTION
(WALDO, 1955)
www.ginandjar.com 2S3-Unpas_2012
LAW
ECONOMICSSOCIOLOGY
ADMINISTRATION
PSYCHOLOGY
BUSINESS
PHILOSOPHY
POLITICS
www.ginandjar.com 3S3-Unpas_2012
Program Doktor Bidang Ilmu SosialUniversitas Pasundan
Bandung2012
ADMINISTRATION IS A TYPE OFCOOPERATIVE HUMAN EFFORT THAT HASA HIGH DEGREE OF RATIONALITY
HUMAN ACTION IS COOPERATIVE IF ITHAS EFFECTS THAT WOULD BE ABSENT IFTHE COOPERATION DID NOT TAKE PLACE
(WALDO, 1955)
ADMINISTRATION IS A TYPE OFCOOPERATIVE HUMAN EFFORT THAT HASA HIGH DEGREE OF RATIONALITY
HUMAN ACTION IS COOPERATIVE IF ITHAS EFFECTS THAT WOULD BE ABSENT IFTHE COOPERATION DID NOT TAKE PLACE
(WALDO, 1955)
www.ginandjar.com 5S3-Unpas_2012
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HIGH DEGREE OFRATIONALITY LIES IN THE FACT THATHUMAN COOPERATION VARIES INEFFECTIVENESS OF GOAL ATTAINMENT,WHETHER WE THINK IN TERMS OFFORMAL GOALS, THE GOALS OF LEADERS,OR OF ALL WHO COOPERATE
(WALDO, 1955)
WHAT IS ADMINISTRATION?
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HIGH DEGREE OFRATIONALITY LIES IN THE FACT THATHUMAN COOPERATION VARIES INEFFECTIVENESS OF GOAL ATTAINMENT,WHETHER WE THINK IN TERMS OFFORMAL GOALS, THE GOALS OF LEADERS,OR OF ALL WHO COOPERATE
(WALDO, 1955)
www.ginandjar.com 6S3-Unpas_2012
WHAT IS ADMINISTRATION?
ADMINISTRATION IS A PLANNEDAPPROACH TO THE SOLVING OF ALLKINDS OF PROBLEMS IN ALMOST EVERYINDIVIDUAL OR GROUP ACTIVITY, BOTHPUBLIC AND PRIVATE
(DIMOCK, DIMOCK, AND KOENIG, 1960)
ADMINISTRATION IS A PLANNEDAPPROACH TO THE SOLVING OF ALLKINDS OF PROBLEMS IN ALMOST EVERYINDIVIDUAL OR GROUP ACTIVITY, BOTHPUBLIC AND PRIVATE
(DIMOCK, DIMOCK, AND KOENIG, 1960)
www.ginandjar.com 7S3-Unpas_2012
IN ITS BROADEST SENSE ADMINISTRATIONCAN BE DEFINED AS THE ACTIVITIES OFGROUPS COOPERATING TO ACCOMPLISHCOMMON GOALS
(SIMON, 1991)
WHAT IS ADMINISTRATION?
IN ITS BROADEST SENSE ADMINISTRATIONCAN BE DEFINED AS THE ACTIVITIES OFGROUPS COOPERATING TO ACCOMPLISHCOMMON GOALS
(SIMON, 1991)
www.ginandjar.com 8S3-Unpas_2012
DECIDE TOBUY
LOTTERIES
FAMILY HAVE SOMEMONEY
RESULTS
WIN LOSE
RICHER ORBETTER LIFE
POORER ORWORSE LIFE
www.ginandjar.com 9S3-Unpas_2012
ILLUSTRATION…
DECIDE TO USE THEMONEY AS CAPITAL
TO ESTABLISH ASHOP
HAVE SOMEMONEY
FAMILY
WORKINGTOGETHER IN
THE OPERATIONOF THE SHOP
RESULTS
SUCCESFUL FAILURE
BETTER LIFE FIND WAYS TOSTART AGAIN
www.ginandjar.com 10S3-Unpas_2012
WHAT IS ADMINISTRATION?
www.ginandjar.com 11S3-Unpas_2012
WHAT IS ADMINISTRATION?
www.ginandjar.com 12S3-Unpas_2012
THE STUDY OF ADMINISTRATION IS CONCERNED WITHQUESTIONS SUCH AS:
1. HOW THE METHOD WAS CHOOSEN,2. HOW THE MEN (OR WOMEN) WERE SELECTED AND
INDUCED TO COOPERATE IN CARRYING OUT SUCH A TASK,3. HOW THE TASK WAS DIVIDED BETWEEN THEM,4. HOW EACH ONE LEARNED WHAT HIS PARTICULAR JOB WAS
IN THE TOTAL PATTERN,5. HOW HE LEARNED TO PERFORM IT,6. HOW HIS EFFORTS ARE COORDINATED WITH THE EFFORTS
OF THE OTHER
(SIMON, 1991)
WHAT IS ADMINISTRATION?
THE STUDY OF ADMINISTRATION IS CONCERNED WITHQUESTIONS SUCH AS:
1. HOW THE METHOD WAS CHOOSEN,2. HOW THE MEN (OR WOMEN) WERE SELECTED AND
INDUCED TO COOPERATE IN CARRYING OUT SUCH A TASK,3. HOW THE TASK WAS DIVIDED BETWEEN THEM,4. HOW EACH ONE LEARNED WHAT HIS PARTICULAR JOB WAS
IN THE TOTAL PATTERN,5. HOW HE LEARNED TO PERFORM IT,6. HOW HIS EFFORTS ARE COORDINATED WITH THE EFFORTS
OF THE OTHER
(SIMON, 1991)
www.ginandjar.com 13S3-Unpas_2012
WHAT IS ADMINISTRATION?
ADMINISTRASIDALAM ARTI
SEMPIT
TATA USAHAURUSAN : ⇨SURAT MENYURAT
⇨KEPEGAWAIAN
⇨KEUANGAN
⇨LOGISTIK
=
STAF ADMINISTRASI
www.ginandjar.com 14S3-Unpas_2012
ADMINISTRASIDALAM ARTI
SEMPIT
TATA USAHAURUSAN : ⇨SURAT MENYURAT
⇨KEPEGAWAIAN
⇨KEUANGAN
⇨LOGISTIK
SINCE ADMINISTRATION IS CONCERNED WITH ALLPATTERNS OF COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR, IT IS OBVIOUSTHAT ANY PERSON ENGAGED IN AN ACTIVITY INCOOPERATION WITH OTHER PERSONS IS ENGAGED INADMINISTRATION
SINCE EVERYONE HAS COOPERATED WITH OTHERSTHROUGHOUT HIS LIFE, HE HAS SOME BASICFAMILIARITY WITH ADMINISTRATION AND SOME OF ITSPROBLEMS
(SIMON, 1991)
SINCE ADMINISTRATION IS CONCERNED WITH ALLPATTERNS OF COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR, IT IS OBVIOUSTHAT ANY PERSON ENGAGED IN AN ACTIVITY INCOOPERATION WITH OTHER PERSONS IS ENGAGED INADMINISTRATION
SINCE EVERYONE HAS COOPERATED WITH OTHERSTHROUGHOUT HIS LIFE, HE HAS SOME BASICFAMILIARITY WITH ADMINISTRATION AND SOME OF ITSPROBLEMS
(SIMON, 1991)
www.ginandjar.com 15S3-Unpas_2012
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ADMINISTRATIONARE BEST SUBSUMED UNDER THE TWOTERMS ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
(WALDO, 1955)
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ARE THE TWOFACES OF THE SAME COIN.
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ADMINISTRATIONARE BEST SUBSUMED UNDER THE TWOTERMS ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
(WALDO, 1955)
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ARE THE TWOFACES OF THE SAME COIN.
www.ginandjar.com 16S3-Unpas_2012
CHARACTERISTICS OF ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION IS THE ANATOMY,MANAGEMENT THE PHYSIOLOGY, OFADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION IS THE STRUCTURE;MANAGEMENT IS THE FUNCTIONINGOF ADMINISTRATION
(WALDO, 1955)
ORGANIZATION IS THE ANATOMY,MANAGEMENT THE PHYSIOLOGY, OFADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION IS THE STRUCTURE;MANAGEMENT IS THE FUNCTIONINGOF ADMINISTRATION
(WALDO, 1955)
www.ginandjar.com 17S3-Unpas_2012
UNPAS_2009 www.ginandjar.com 18
ORGANIZATION
Directorate General
Directorate/BureauDirectorate/Bureau
Division
Section
www.ginandjar.com 19S3-Unpas_2012
MANAGER
MANAGEMENT
PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION CONTROLLING
www.ginandjar.com 20S3-Unpas_2012
THE STRUCTURE OF AUTHORITATIVEAND HABITUAL PERSONALINTERRELATIONS IN ANADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM
(WALDO, 1955)
THE STRUCTURE OF AUTHORITATIVEAND HABITUAL PERSONALINTERRELATIONS IN ANADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM
(WALDO, 1955)
www.ginandjar.com 21S3-Unpas_2012
IN GENERAL, ORGANIZATIONAL THEORYIS “GENERIC” IN THE SENSE THAT IT DOESNOT MAKE DISTINCTIONS BETWEENPUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS
(BOZEMAN, 1987)
IN GENERAL, ORGANIZATIONAL THEORYIS “GENERIC” IN THE SENSE THAT IT DOESNOT MAKE DISTINCTIONS BETWEENPUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS
(BOZEMAN, 1987)
www.ginandjar.com 22S3-Unpas_2012
1. STAFF ORGANIZATION
2. LINE ORGANIZATION
3. LINE AND STAFF ORGANIZATION
1. STAFF ORGANIZATION
2. LINE ORGANIZATION
3. LINE AND STAFF ORGANIZATION
www.ginandjar.com 23S3-Unpas_2012
MINISTER
ORGANIZATION
ASSISTANTMINISTERASSISTANTMINISTER
INSPECTORGENERAL
INSPECTORINSPECTOR
SECRETARYGENERAL
DIRECTORGENERAL
DIRECTORGENERAL
DIRECTOR DIRECTOR BUREAUBUREAU
ASSISTANTMINISTERASSISTANTMINISTER
www.ginandjar.com 24S3-Unpas_2012
TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION UNITSTAFLINE
LINE AND STAFF ORGANIZATION
SALES MANAGER
MARKET FORECASTORMARKET FORECASTOR MARKET FORECASTOR
SALES PEOPLE
REGION C SALESMANAGER
REGION B SALESMANAGER
REGION A SALESMANAGER
TRAINING DIRECTOR
SALES PEOPLESALES PEOPLE
www.ginandjar.com 25S3-Unpas_2012
MARKET FORECASTOR
THE TERM "MANAGEMENT" APPEARED EARLY IN THEDISCUSSION OF STATE ADMINISTRATION AS VIRTUALLYSYNONYMOUS WITH ADMINISTRATION.MANAGEMENT AS A DISTINCTIVE IDEA DID NOT BEGINTO EMERGE UNTIL THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, WITH“EXPLICIT THEORIZING…PERHAPS MOST NOTICEABLEIN THE US, WHICH INDUSTRIALIZED LATER AND EVENFASTER THAN GERMANY OR THE UK.” (POLLITT, 1990)
THE TERM "MANAGEMENT" APPEARED EARLY IN THEDISCUSSION OF STATE ADMINISTRATION AS VIRTUALLYSYNONYMOUS WITH ADMINISTRATION.MANAGEMENT AS A DISTINCTIVE IDEA DID NOT BEGINTO EMERGE UNTIL THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, WITH“EXPLICIT THEORIZING…PERHAPS MOST NOTICEABLEIN THE US, WHICH INDUSTRIALIZED LATER AND EVENFASTER THAN GERMANY OR THE UK.” (POLLITT, 1990)
www.ginandjar.com 26S3-Unpas_2012
GETTING THINGS DONE THROUGH THE EFFORTS OFOTHER PEOPLE (TAYLOR, 1912).
ACTION INTENDED TO ACHIEVE RATIONAL COOPERATIONIN AN ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM (WALDO, 1955).
MANAGEMENT REFERS TO THE PROCESS OF RUNNINGAN ORGANIZATION AND THE USE OF RESOURCES TOACCOMPLISH ITS GOALS. THE TERM ALSO REFERS TOTHOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE FORMALLY AUTHORIZEDTO RUN THE ORGANIZATION (LEMAY, 2002).
GETTING THINGS DONE THROUGH THE EFFORTS OFOTHER PEOPLE (TAYLOR, 1912).
ACTION INTENDED TO ACHIEVE RATIONAL COOPERATIONIN AN ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM (WALDO, 1955).
MANAGEMENT REFERS TO THE PROCESS OF RUNNINGAN ORGANIZATION AND THE USE OF RESOURCES TOACCOMPLISH ITS GOALS. THE TERM ALSO REFERS TOTHOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE FORMALLY AUTHORIZEDTO RUN THE ORGANIZATION (LEMAY, 2002).
www.ginandjar.com 27S3-Unpas_2012
CLASSICAL MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS : PLANNING ORGANIZING STAFFING DIRECTING COORDINATING REPORTING BUDGETING
(LUTHER GULICK AND LYNDALL URWICK, 1932)
CLASSICAL MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS : PLANNING ORGANIZING STAFFING DIRECTING COORDINATING REPORTING BUDGETING
(LUTHER GULICK AND LYNDALL URWICK, 1932)
www.ginandjar.com 28S3-Unpas_2012
ALTHOUGH THE SERIOUS STUDY OF LEADERSHIP ISONLY ABOUT 100 YEARS OLD, INTEREST INLEADERS AND LEADERSHIP DATES BACKTHOUSANDS OF YEARS.
IN ADDITION TO THE ENORMOUS POWER THATLEADERS HAVE HAD OVER THEIR PEOPLE-LITERALLY LIFE AND DEATH-LEADERS OFTENATTAINED GODLIKE STATUS THEMSELVES.
(MONTGOMERY VAN WART, 2008)
ALTHOUGH THE SERIOUS STUDY OF LEADERSHIP ISONLY ABOUT 100 YEARS OLD, INTEREST INLEADERS AND LEADERSHIP DATES BACKTHOUSANDS OF YEARS.
IN ADDITION TO THE ENORMOUS POWER THATLEADERS HAVE HAD OVER THEIR PEOPLE-LITERALLY LIFE AND DEATH-LEADERS OFTENATTAINED GODLIKE STATUS THEMSELVES.
(MONTGOMERY VAN WART, 2008)
www.ginandjar.com 29S3-Unpas_2012
TYPES OF WORK
EXECUTION POLICY NEW IDEAS
TYPE
SO
F FO
LLO
WER
S
EMPLOYEES MANAGERS EXECUTIVES WITHPOLICYRESPONSIBILITIES
TRANSFORMATIONLEADERS
TYPE
SO
F FO
LLO
WER
S
EXECUTIVES WITHPOLICYRESPONSIBILITIES
CONSTITUENTS COMMUNITYLEADERS OFVOLUNTEERGROUPS
LEGISLATORS ANDADVISORY BOARDMEMBERS
LOBBYISTS ANDPOLICYENTREPRENEURS
ADHERENTS SMALL GROUPLEADERS
LEADERS OF SOCIALMOVEMENTS
PHILOSOPHICALZEALOTS ANDSOCIAL TRENDSETTERS
-ibid-
www.ginandjar.com 30S3-Unpas_2012
MENORGANIZATION
GOAL GOAL GOAL GOALS
ULTIMATEINTERMEDIATE
MATERIALS MANAGEMENTGOAL GOAL GOAL GOALS
www.ginandjar.com 31S3-Unpas_2012
THE CLASSIC MEANING OF PUBLIC DERIVES FROM TWOSOURCES. THE FIRST IS THE GREEK WORD PUBES, OR"MATURITY," WHICH IN THE GREEK SENSE MEANS IN THEBOTH PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL OR INTELLECTUALMATURITY AND EMPHASIZE MOVING FROM THE SELFISHCONCERNS OR PERSONAL SELF-INTEREST TO SEEINGBEYOND ONE'S SELF TO UNDERSTAND THE INTEREST OFOTHERS
IT IMPLIES AN ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THECONSEQUENCES OF ONE'S INDIVIDUAL ACTIONS ON OTHERPEOPLE
THE CLASSIC MEANING OF PUBLIC DERIVES FROM TWOSOURCES. THE FIRST IS THE GREEK WORD PUBES, OR"MATURITY," WHICH IN THE GREEK SENSE MEANS IN THEBOTH PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL OR INTELLECTUALMATURITY AND EMPHASIZE MOVING FROM THE SELFISHCONCERNS OR PERSONAL SELF-INTEREST TO SEEINGBEYOND ONE'S SELF TO UNDERSTAND THE INTEREST OFOTHERS
IT IMPLIES AN ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THECONSEQUENCES OF ONE'S INDIVIDUAL ACTIONS ON OTHERPEOPLE
www.ginandjar.com 32S3-Unpas_2012
FREDERICKSON’S FIVE PERSPECTIVES OF PUBLIC INPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION:
1) THE PUBLIC AS INTEREST GROUPS (THE PLURALISTPERSPECTIVE)
2) THE PUBLIC AS RATIONAL CHOOSER (THE PUBLIC CHOICEPERSPECTIVE)
3) THE PUBLIC AS REPRESENTED (THE LEGISLATIVEPERSPECTIVE)
4) THE PUBLIC AS CUSTOMER (THE SERVICE-PROVIDINGPERSPECTIVE)
5) THE PUBLIC AS CITIZEN
WHAT IS PUBLIC?
FREDERICKSON’S FIVE PERSPECTIVES OF PUBLIC INPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION:
1) THE PUBLIC AS INTEREST GROUPS (THE PLURALISTPERSPECTIVE)
2) THE PUBLIC AS RATIONAL CHOOSER (THE PUBLIC CHOICEPERSPECTIVE)
3) THE PUBLIC AS REPRESENTED (THE LEGISLATIVEPERSPECTIVE)
4) THE PUBLIC AS CUSTOMER (THE SERVICE-PROVIDINGPERSPECTIVE)
5) THE PUBLIC AS CITIZEN
www.ginandjar.com 33S3-Unpas_2012
THE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF MENAND MATERIALS TO ACHIEVE THE PURPOSES OFGOVERNMENT
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MANAGEMENT ASAPPLIED TO AFFAIRS OF STATE
(WALDO, 1955)
THE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF MENAND MATERIALS TO ACHIEVE THE PURPOSES OFGOVERNMENT
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MANAGEMENT ASAPPLIED TO AFFAIRS OF STATE
(WALDO, 1955)
www.ginandjar.com 34S3-Unpas_2012
THE ADMINISTRATION OR MANAGEMENT OFMATTERS WHICH HAVE PRINCIPALLY TO DO WITH THESOCIETY, POLITY, AND ITS SUBPARTS WHICH ARE NOTESSENTIALLY PRIVATE, FAMILIAL, COMMERCIAL, ORINDIVIDUALISTIC.
DISCIPLINED STUDY OF SUCH MATTERS. IN ITS SIMPLEST MEANING, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
HAS TO DO WITH MANAGING THE REALM OFGOVERNMENTAL AND OTHER PUBLIC ACTIVITIES
(MARTINI, 1998)
THE ADMINISTRATION OR MANAGEMENT OFMATTERS WHICH HAVE PRINCIPALLY TO DO WITH THESOCIETY, POLITY, AND ITS SUBPARTS WHICH ARE NOTESSENTIALLY PRIVATE, FAMILIAL, COMMERCIAL, ORINDIVIDUALISTIC.
DISCIPLINED STUDY OF SUCH MATTERS. IN ITS SIMPLEST MEANING, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
HAS TO DO WITH MANAGING THE REALM OFGOVERNMENTAL AND OTHER PUBLIC ACTIVITIES
(MARTINI, 1998)
www.ginandjar.com 35S3-Unpas_2012
ADMINISTRATION = GOVERNMENT
www.ginandjar.com 36S3-Unpas_2012
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
OCUPATION/PROFESSION
ACADEMIC FIELD
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
OCUPATION/PROFESSION
ACADEMIC FIELD
RESEARCHTEACHING
www.ginandjar.com 37S3-Unpas_2012
1. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND THE BEHAVIOROF PEOPLE IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS;
2. THE TECHNOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT AND THEINSTITUTIONS OF POLICY IMPLEMENTATION;
3. THE PUBLIC INTEREST AS IT RELATES TO INDIVIDUALETHICAL CHOICE AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS.
(BAILEY, 1968)
1. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND THE BEHAVIOROF PEOPLE IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS;
2. THE TECHNOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT AND THEINSTITUTIONS OF POLICY IMPLEMENTATION;
3. THE PUBLIC INTEREST AS IT RELATES TO INDIVIDUALETHICAL CHOICE AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS.
(BAILEY, 1968)
www.ginandjar.com 38S3-Unpas_2012
NATIONALRESOURCES
ORGANIZEII
MANAGEPUBLIC
GOODS
SERVICES
GOAL
GOAL
GOAL
ULTIMATEGOALS
GOAL
– NATURALRESOURCES
– HUMANRESOURCES
– RELIGION,ETHICS
– CULTURE,HERITAGE,TRADITION
– EMPLOYMENT– POVERTY– EDUCATION– HEALTH– JUSTICE– DEMOCRACY– ENVIRONMENT– SECURITY
– SOCIALJUSTICE
– INDIVIDUALRIGHTS
– FREEDOM
www.ginandjar.com 39S3-Unpas_2012
MANAGERIAL POLITICAL LEGAL
MANAGERIAL POLITICAL LEGAL
www.ginandjar.com 40S3-Unpas_2012
APPROACHES TO PUBLICADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IS GEAREDTOWARD THE MAXIMIZATION OFEFFECTIVENESS, EFFICIENCY, ANDECONOMY
(ROSENBLOOM, 2005)
MANAGERIAL APPROACH
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IS GEAREDTOWARD THE MAXIMIZATION OFEFFECTIVENESS, EFFICIENCY, ANDECONOMY
(ROSENBLOOM, 2005)
www.ginandjar.com 41S3-Unpas_2012
ADMINISTRATION
PRIVATE
PLANNING
ORGANIZING
PLANING PROCESS
BUDGETING
STRUCTURES
PROCEDURES
PUBLIC
ORGANIZING
IMPLEMENTING
CONTROLLING
PROCEDURES
HUMAN RESOURCES
STANDARD OPERATINGPROCEDURES
MONITORING
EVALUATION
FEED BACK
GOALS
www.ginandjar.com 42S3-Unpas_2012
THE PROCESS OF ENSURING THAT THE ALLOCATION AND
USE OF RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO THE GOVERNMENT
ARE DIRECTED TOWARD THE ACHIEVEMENT OF LAWFUL
PUBLIC POLICY GOALS.
THIS DEFINITION SEES THE PUBLIC MANAGER AS BOTH
CREATURE-OF POLITICS, LAW, STRUCTURES, AND ROLES—
AND CREATOR—OF STRATEGIES, CAPACITY, AND RESULTS.
THE PROCESS OF ENSURING THAT THE ALLOCATION AND
USE OF RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO THE GOVERNMENT
ARE DIRECTED TOWARD THE ACHIEVEMENT OF LAWFUL
PUBLIC POLICY GOALS.
THIS DEFINITION SEES THE PUBLIC MANAGER AS BOTH
CREATURE-OF POLITICS, LAW, STRUCTURES, AND ROLES—
AND CREATOR—OF STRATEGIES, CAPACITY, AND RESULTS.
www.ginandjar.com 43S3-Unpas_2012
APPROACHES TO PUBLICADMINISTRATION
POWER, AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY RELATIONSHIP.
RESPONSIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF THEADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES AND THE BUREAUCRACIES TOTHE ELECTED OFFICIALS (THE CHIEF EXECUTIVES, THELEGISLATORS).
IT IS OF CENTRAL IMPORTANCE IN A GOVERNMENT BASEDINCREASINGLY ON THE EXERCISE OF DISCRETIONARYPOWER BY THE AGENCIES OF ADMINISTRATION.
(ROSENBLOOM, 2005)
POLITICAL APPROACH
POWER, AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY RELATIONSHIP.
RESPONSIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF THEADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES AND THE BUREAUCRACIES TOTHE ELECTED OFFICIALS (THE CHIEF EXECUTIVES, THELEGISLATORS).
IT IS OF CENTRAL IMPORTANCE IN A GOVERNMENT BASEDINCREASINGLY ON THE EXERCISE OF DISCRETIONARYPOWER BY THE AGENCIES OF ADMINISTRATION.
(ROSENBLOOM, 2005)
www.ginandjar.com 44S3-Unpas_2012
APPROACHES TO PUBLICADMINISTRATION
AN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY IS A GOVERNMENTALAUTHORITY, OTHER THAN A COURT AND OTHER THAN ALEGISLATIVE BODY, WHICH AFFECTS THE RIGHTS OFPRIVATE PARTIES THROUGH EITHER ADJUDICATION, RULEMAKING, INVESTIGATING, PROSECUTING, NEGOTIATING,SETTLING, OR INFORMALLY ACTING.
THE LEGAL APPROACH TO PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONEMPHASIZES THE RULE OF LAW.
(ROSENBLOOM, 2005)
LEGAL APPROACH
AN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY IS A GOVERNMENTALAUTHORITY, OTHER THAN A COURT AND OTHER THAN ALEGISLATIVE BODY, WHICH AFFECTS THE RIGHTS OFPRIVATE PARTIES THROUGH EITHER ADJUDICATION, RULEMAKING, INVESTIGATING, PROSECUTING, NEGOTIATING,SETTLING, OR INFORMALLY ACTING.
THE LEGAL APPROACH TO PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONEMPHASIZES THE RULE OF LAW.
(ROSENBLOOM, 2005)
www.ginandjar.com 45S3-Unpas_2012
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REFERS TO THOSE LAWS ANDREGULATIONS THAT ARE CREATED BY THE ACTIVITIESOF GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES THAT MAKE RULES ANDADJUDICATE CASES CONCERNING PRIVATE RIGHTSAND OBLIGATIONS AND THE LIMITS NEEDED TOCONTROL SUCH AGENCIES.
INCLUDED IN THE BODY OF LAWS (OR RULES ANDREGULATIONS) OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES THATCOLLECTIVELY MAKE UP ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AREINTERPRETATIVE RULES—THOSE RULES THAT SPECIFYAN AGENCY'S VIEWS OF THE MEANING OF ITSREGULATIONS OR OF THE STATUTES IT ADMINISTERS.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REFERS TO THOSE LAWS ANDREGULATIONS THAT ARE CREATED BY THE ACTIVITIESOF GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES THAT MAKE RULES ANDADJUDICATE CASES CONCERNING PRIVATE RIGHTSAND OBLIGATIONS AND THE LIMITS NEEDED TOCONTROL SUCH AGENCIES.
INCLUDED IN THE BODY OF LAWS (OR RULES ANDREGULATIONS) OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES THATCOLLECTIVELY MAKE UP ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AREINTERPRETATIVE RULES—THOSE RULES THAT SPECIFYAN AGENCY'S VIEWS OF THE MEANING OF ITSREGULATIONS OR OF THE STATUTES IT ADMINISTERS.
www.ginandjar.com 46S3-Unpas_2012
A COMMON USAGE OF ‘PUBLIC’ IS TO DISTINGUISHBETWEEN THE ‘PUBLIC SECTOR’ AND THE ‘PRIVATESECTOR’, WHICH ESSENTIALLY REVOLVES AROUNDDIFFERENCE OF OWNERSHIP (COLLECTIVE OWNERSHIP,IN THE NAME OF ALL CITIZEN, VERSUS INDIVIDUALOWNERSHIP) AND MOTIVE ( SOCIAL PURPOSE VERSUSPROFIT).
(BOVAIRD AND LöFFER , 2003)
A COMMON USAGE OF ‘PUBLIC’ IS TO DISTINGUISHBETWEEN THE ‘PUBLIC SECTOR’ AND THE ‘PRIVATESECTOR’, WHICH ESSENTIALLY REVOLVES AROUNDDIFFERENCE OF OWNERSHIP (COLLECTIVE OWNERSHIP,IN THE NAME OF ALL CITIZEN, VERSUS INDIVIDUALOWNERSHIP) AND MOTIVE ( SOCIAL PURPOSE VERSUSPROFIT).
(BOVAIRD AND LöFFER , 2003)
www.ginandjar.com 47S3-Unpas_2012
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
1. SERVICE DELIVERY2. POLITICAL PROCESS3. LEGALISTIC APPROACH4. BUREAUCRACY5. EFFECTIVE6. NO COMPETITION7. SOCIAL WELFARE GOALS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
1. SERVICE DELIVERY2. POLITICAL PROCESS3. LEGALISTIC APPROACH4. BUREAUCRACY5. EFFECTIVE6. NO COMPETITION7. SOCIAL WELFARE GOALS
PRIVATE ADMINISTRATION
1. PROFIT MOTIVATION2. BUSINESS ACTIVITIES3. PROFIT APPROACH4. EGALITER5. EFFICIENT6. FREE COMPETITION7. INDIVIDUL WELFARE
TARGETS
PRIVATE ADMINISTRATION
1. PROFIT MOTIVATION2. BUSINESS ACTIVITIES3. PROFIT APPROACH4. EGALITER5. EFFICIENT6. FREE COMPETITION7. INDIVIDUL WELFARE
TARGETS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
1. SERVICE DELIVERY2. POLITICAL PROCESS3. LEGALISTIC APPROACH4. BUREAUCRACY5. EFFECTIVE6. NO COMPETITION7. SOCIAL WELFARE GOALS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
1. SERVICE DELIVERY2. POLITICAL PROCESS3. LEGALISTIC APPROACH4. BUREAUCRACY5. EFFECTIVE6. NO COMPETITION7. SOCIAL WELFARE GOALS
PRIVATE ADMINISTRATION
1. PROFIT MOTIVATION2. BUSINESS ACTIVITIES3. PROFIT APPROACH4. EGALITER5. EFFICIENT6. FREE COMPETITION7. INDIVIDUL WELFARE
TARGETS
PRIVATE ADMINISTRATION
1. PROFIT MOTIVATION2. BUSINESS ACTIVITIES3. PROFIT APPROACH4. EGALITER5. EFFICIENT6. FREE COMPETITION7. INDIVIDUL WELFARE
TARGETS
www.ginandjar.com 48S3-Unpas_2012
THE REMOTENESS OF MARKET FORCES FROM PUBLICADMINISTRATION ENABLES THE GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDESERVICES AND PRODUCTS THAT COULD NOT PROFITABLY BEOFFERED BY PRIVATE FIRMS.
SOME OF THESE SERVICES AND PRODUCTS ARE REFFERED TOAS PUBLIC GOODS OR QUASI-PUBLIC GOODS.
PUBLIC GOODS THE REMOTENESS OF MARKET FORCES FROM PUBLIC
ADMINISTRATION ENABLES THE GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDESERVICES AND PRODUCTS THAT COULD NOT PROFITABLY BEOFFERED BY PRIVATE FIRMS.
SOME OF THESE SERVICES AND PRODUCTS ARE REFFERED TOAS PUBLIC GOODS OR QUASI-PUBLIC GOODS.
www.ginandjar.com 49S3-Unpas_2012
WHEN UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO A GOOD, SUCH ASHEALTH CARE OR EDUCATION, SECURITY OR SAFETYBECOMES VIEWED AS AN ESSENTIAL INGREDIENT OFTHE KIND OF SOCIETY THE POLITICAL SYSTEM WANTSTO FOSTER, IT IS LIKELY TO BE CONSIDERED A PUBLICGOOD.
PUBLIC GOODS
WHEN UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO A GOOD, SUCH ASHEALTH CARE OR EDUCATION, SECURITY OR SAFETYBECOMES VIEWED AS AN ESSENTIAL INGREDIENT OFTHE KIND OF SOCIETY THE POLITICAL SYSTEM WANTSTO FOSTER, IT IS LIKELY TO BE CONSIDERED A PUBLICGOOD.
www.ginandjar.com 50S3-Unpas_2012
BROADLY SPEAKING, THESE ARE GOODS, THATINDIVIDUALS CANNOT BE EXCLUDED FROM ENJOYING,THAT ARE NOT EXHAUSTED OR SIGNIFICANTLYDIMINISHED AS MORE INDIVIDUALS USE THEM, ANDFOR WHICH INDIVIDUALS DO NOT COMPETE.
PUBLIC GOODS
BROADLY SPEAKING, THESE ARE GOODS, THATINDIVIDUALS CANNOT BE EXCLUDED FROM ENJOYING,THAT ARE NOT EXHAUSTED OR SIGNIFICANTLYDIMINISHED AS MORE INDIVIDUALS USE THEM, ANDFOR WHICH INDIVIDUALS DO NOT COMPETE.
www.ginandjar.com 51S3-Unpas_2012
PRIVATE FIRMS TYPICALLY FACE MARKETS IN A FAR MOREDIRECT FASHION. UNDER FREE-MARKET CONDITIONS, IFTHEY FAIL TO PRODUCE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES ATCOMPETITIVE PRICES, CONSUMERS TURN TO OTHERSOURCES AND A COMPANY'S INCOME DECLINES.
IN BETWEEN THE TYPICAL PUBLIC AGENCY AND THEPRIVATE FIRM IS A GRAY AREA IN WHICH NOT-FOR-PROFITORGANIZATION AND HIGHLY REGULATED INDUSTRIES,SUCH AS MANY UTILITIES, OPERATE.
PUBLIC GOODS
PRIVATE FIRMS TYPICALLY FACE MARKETS IN A FAR MOREDIRECT FASHION. UNDER FREE-MARKET CONDITIONS, IFTHEY FAIL TO PRODUCE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES ATCOMPETITIVE PRICES, CONSUMERS TURN TO OTHERSOURCES AND A COMPANY'S INCOME DECLINES.
IN BETWEEN THE TYPICAL PUBLIC AGENCY AND THEPRIVATE FIRM IS A GRAY AREA IN WHICH NOT-FOR-PROFITORGANIZATION AND HIGHLY REGULATED INDUSTRIES,SUCH AS MANY UTILITIES, OPERATE.
www.ginandjar.com 52S3-Unpas_2012
PUBLIC POLICY
FOR MANY YEARS, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATORS WERE SEENAS NEUTRAL IMPLEMENTORS OF PUBLIC POLICIESSHAPED AND DESIGNED ELSEWHERE IN THE DEMOCRATICPROCESS. SINCE THE 1960s, WITH THE GROWTH OFPUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS, BOTH THE POLICY PROCESS ITSELF AND THE ROLE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN ITHAVE BEEN REEVALUATED.
FOR MANY YEARS, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATORS WERE SEENAS NEUTRAL IMPLEMENTORS OF PUBLIC POLICIESSHAPED AND DESIGNED ELSEWHERE IN THE DEMOCRATICPROCESS. SINCE THE 1960s, WITH THE GROWTH OFPUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS, BOTH THE POLICY PROCESS ITSELF AND THE ROLE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN ITHAVE BEEN REEVALUATED.
www.ginandjar.com 53S3-Unpas_2012
PROCEEDING FROM THE PREMISE THAT POLITICS ISMESSY AND IMPRECISE, PROPONENTS OF PUBLIC POLICYANALYSIS ARGUE THAT THE INTRODUCTION OFRIGOROUS ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES AND DECISIONTOOLS WILL DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE BOTH THEDEFINITION OF PUBLIC PROBLEMS AND THEIDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS TO THEM.
PUBLIC POLICY
PROCEEDING FROM THE PREMISE THAT POLITICS ISMESSY AND IMPRECISE, PROPONENTS OF PUBLIC POLICYANALYSIS ARGUE THAT THE INTRODUCTION OFRIGOROUS ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES AND DECISIONTOOLS WILL DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE BOTH THEDEFINITION OF PUBLIC PROBLEMS AND THEIDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS TO THEM.
www.ginandjar.com 54S3-Unpas_2012
PUBLIC POLICY
FURTHER, IT IS ARGUED THAT MORE RATIONAL DECISIONPROCESSES WILL NOT ONLY BE MORE EFFICIENT, BUT ALSOMORE RESPONSIVE TO CITIZEN NEEDS AND PREFERENCES.THIS VERSION OF PUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS VALUESOBJECTIVITY AND NEUTRALITY; IT IS BASED ON AN ABIDINGBELIEF IN TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND ABILITIES.
FURTHER, IT IS ARGUED THAT MORE RATIONAL DECISIONPROCESSES WILL NOT ONLY BE MORE EFFICIENT, BUT ALSOMORE RESPONSIVE TO CITIZEN NEEDS AND PREFERENCES.THIS VERSION OF PUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS VALUESOBJECTIVITY AND NEUTRALITY; IT IS BASED ON AN ABIDINGBELIEF IN TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND ABILITIES.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 55
PUBLIC POLICY
IT MAKES USE OF TECHNIQUES DEVELOPED IN THE FIELDS OFECONOMICS, MATHEMATICS, STATISTICS, OPERATIONS RESEARCH,AND SYSTEMS DYNAMICS, AMONG OTHERS, TO PROVIDE DECISIONMAKERS WITH ADVICE IN THE FORMULATION OF PUBLIC POLICY.
IN APPLYING THOSE TECHNIQUES, THE ANALYST MAY ALSO DRAWON KNOWLEDGE FROM FIELDS SUCH AS SOCIOLOGY, POLITICALSCIENCE, WELFARE ECONOMICS, LAW, ORGANIZATION - THEORY,THE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, AND ELSEWHERE.POLICY ANALYSIS MUST TAKE THE ANALYST WHEREVER THE POLICYISSUE LEADS, MAKING ANALYSIS THE MULTI DISIPLINARY ACTIVITYPAR EXCELLENCE.
IT MAKES USE OF TECHNIQUES DEVELOPED IN THE FIELDS OFECONOMICS, MATHEMATICS, STATISTICS, OPERATIONS RESEARCH,AND SYSTEMS DYNAMICS, AMONG OTHERS, TO PROVIDE DECISIONMAKERS WITH ADVICE IN THE FORMULATION OF PUBLIC POLICY.
IN APPLYING THOSE TECHNIQUES, THE ANALYST MAY ALSO DRAWON KNOWLEDGE FROM FIELDS SUCH AS SOCIOLOGY, POLITICALSCIENCE, WELFARE ECONOMICS, LAW, ORGANIZATION - THEORY,THE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, AND ELSEWHERE.POLICY ANALYSIS MUST TAKE THE ANALYST WHEREVER THE POLICYISSUE LEADS, MAKING ANALYSIS THE MULTI DISIPLINARY ACTIVITYPAR EXCELLENCE.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 56
PUBLIC POLICY
POLICY ANALYSIS INCLUDES:1) IDENTIFYING THE “PROBLEM” TO BE RESOLVED,
2) SPECIFYING THE GOAL(S) TO BE SOUGHT THROUGH PUBLIC POLICY,
3) IDENTIFYING OR INVENTING THE AVAILABLE POLICY ALTERNATIVES,
4) ESTIMATING THE EFFECTS OF EACH OF THE ALTERNATIVES, BOTHFAVORABLE AND UNFAVORABLE,
5) IMPUTING VALUES IN A SINGLE, COMMENSURABLE MATRIX TO THOSEEFFECTS, AND
6) CHOOSING THE “BEST” POLICY ALTERNATIVE ACCORDING TO ANEXPLICIT DECISION RULE.
POLICY ANALYSIS INCLUDES:1) IDENTIFYING THE “PROBLEM” TO BE RESOLVED,
2) SPECIFYING THE GOAL(S) TO BE SOUGHT THROUGH PUBLIC POLICY,
3) IDENTIFYING OR INVENTING THE AVAILABLE POLICY ALTERNATIVES,
4) ESTIMATING THE EFFECTS OF EACH OF THE ALTERNATIVES, BOTHFAVORABLE AND UNFAVORABLE,
5) IMPUTING VALUES IN A SINGLE, COMMENSURABLE MATRIX TO THOSEEFFECTS, AND
6) CHOOSING THE “BEST” POLICY ALTERNATIVE ACCORDING TO ANEXPLICIT DECISION RULE.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 57
IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE LAST CENTURY, THEDISCIPLINE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPEDWITHIN THE FRAMEWORK SET BY WILSON. THE ENDS OFPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION WERE SEEN AS THE"MANAGEMENT OF MEN AND MATERIAL IN THEACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE PURPOSES OF THE STATE."
PUBLIC CHOICE
IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE LAST CENTURY, THEDISCIPLINE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPEDWITHIN THE FRAMEWORK SET BY WILSON. THE ENDS OFPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION WERE SEEN AS THE"MANAGEMENT OF MEN AND MATERIAL IN THEACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE PURPOSES OF THE STATE."
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 58
PUBLIC CHOICE
IN HIS BOOK: ADMINISTRATIVE BEHAVIOR (1945), HERBERTSIMON, SUSTAINED A DEVASTATING CRITIQUE OF THETHEORY IMPLICIT IN THE TRADITIONAL STUDY OF PUBLICADMINISTRATION. SIMON ELUCIDATED SOME OF THEACCEPTED ADMINISTRATIVE PRINCIPLES ANDDEMONSTRATED THE LACK OF LOGICAL COHERENCEAMONG THEM.
IN HIS BOOK: ADMINISTRATIVE BEHAVIOR (1945), HERBERTSIMON, SUSTAINED A DEVASTATING CRITIQUE OF THETHEORY IMPLICIT IN THE TRADITIONAL STUDY OF PUBLICADMINISTRATION. SIMON ELUCIDATED SOME OF THEACCEPTED ADMINISTRATIVE PRINCIPLES ANDDEMONSTRATED THE LACK OF LOGICAL COHERENCEAMONG THEM.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 59
PUBLIC CHOICE
DURING THE PERIOD FOLLOWING SIMON'S CHALLENGE,ANOTHER COMMUNITY OF SCHOLARS HAS GRAPPLED WITHMANY OF THESE SAME INTELLECTUAL ISSUES.
THIS COMMUNITY OF SCHOLARS COMPOSEDPREDOMINANTLY OF POLITICAL ECONOMISTS HAVE BEENCONCERNED WITH PUBLIC INVESTMENT AND PUBLICEXPENDITURE DECISIONS.
ONE FACET OF THIS WORK HAS BEEN MANIFEST IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANNING,PROGRAMMING AND BUDGETING (PPB) SYSTEM.
DURING THE PERIOD FOLLOWING SIMON'S CHALLENGE,ANOTHER COMMUNITY OF SCHOLARS HAS GRAPPLED WITHMANY OF THESE SAME INTELLECTUAL ISSUES.
THIS COMMUNITY OF SCHOLARS COMPOSEDPREDOMINANTLY OF POLITICAL ECONOMISTS HAVE BEENCONCERNED WITH PUBLIC INVESTMENT AND PUBLICEXPENDITURE DECISIONS.
ONE FACET OF THIS WORK HAS BEEN MANIFEST IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANNING,PROGRAMMING AND BUDGETING (PPB) SYSTEM.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 60
PUBLIC CHOICE
ONE OF SIMON'S CENTRAL CONCERNS WAS TO ESTABLISHTHE CRITERION OF EFFICIENCY AS A NORM FOR EVALUATINGALTERNATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS. SIMON ARGUEDTHAT THE "CRITERION OF EFFICIENCY DICTATES THAT CHOICEOF ALTERNATIVES WHICH PRODUCE THE LARGEST RESULTFOR THE GIVEN APPLICATION OF RESOURCES."
IN ORDER TO UTILIZE THE CRITERION OF EFFICIENCY, THERESULTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS MUST BE DEFINEDAND MEASURED. CLEAR CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS OFOUTPUT ARE NECESSARY BEFORE MEASURES CAN BEDEVELOPED.
ONE OF SIMON'S CENTRAL CONCERNS WAS TO ESTABLISHTHE CRITERION OF EFFICIENCY AS A NORM FOR EVALUATINGALTERNATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS. SIMON ARGUEDTHAT THE "CRITERION OF EFFICIENCY DICTATES THAT CHOICEOF ALTERNATIVES WHICH PRODUCE THE LARGEST RESULTFOR THE GIVEN APPLICATION OF RESOURCES."
IN ORDER TO UTILIZE THE CRITERION OF EFFICIENCY, THERESULTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS MUST BE DEFINEDAND MEASURED. CLEAR CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS OFOUTPUT ARE NECESSARY BEFORE MEASURES CAN BEDEVELOPED.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 61
PUBLIC CHOICE
PUBLIC CHOICE REPRESENTS ANOTHER FACET OF WORK INPOLITICAL ECONOMY WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR THE THEORYOF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. MOST POLITICAL ECONOMISTSIN THE PUBLIC CHOICE TRADITION BEGIN WITH THEINDIVIDUAL AS THE BASIC UNIT OF ANALYSIS. THETRADITIONAL "ECONOMIC MAN" IS THEN REPLACED BY"MAN: THE DECISION MAKER."
PUBLIC CHOICE REPRESENTS ANOTHER FACET OF WORK INPOLITICAL ECONOMY WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR THE THEORYOF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. MOST POLITICAL ECONOMISTSIN THE PUBLIC CHOICE TRADITION BEGIN WITH THEINDIVIDUAL AS THE BASIC UNIT OF ANALYSIS. THETRADITIONAL "ECONOMIC MAN" IS THEN REPLACED BY"MAN: THE DECISION MAKER."
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 62
PUBLIC CHOICE
THE SECOND CONCERN IN THE PUBLIC CHOICE TRADITION ISWITH THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF PUBLIC GOODS AS THETYPE OF EVENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE OUTPUT OF PUBLICAGENCIES.
PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY IS ALSO CONCERNED WITH THEEFFECT THAT DIFFERENT DECISION RULES OR DECISION-MAKING ARRANGEMENTS WILL HAVE UPON THEPRODUCTION OF THOSE EVENTS CONCEPTUALIZED AS PUBLICGOODS AND SERVICES.
THE SECOND CONCERN IN THE PUBLIC CHOICE TRADITION ISWITH THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF PUBLIC GOODS AS THETYPE OF EVENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE OUTPUT OF PUBLICAGENCIES.
PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY IS ALSO CONCERNED WITH THEEFFECT THAT DIFFERENT DECISION RULES OR DECISION-MAKING ARRANGEMENTS WILL HAVE UPON THEPRODUCTION OF THOSE EVENTS CONCEPTUALIZED AS PUBLICGOODS AND SERVICES.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 63
PUBLIC CHOICE
FOUR BASIC ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT INDIVIDUALBEHAVIOR ARE NORMALLY MADE:
– FIRST, INDIVIDUALS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SELF-INTERESTED(NOT EQUIVALENT TO “SELFISH”). THE ASSUMPTION OFSELF-INTEREST IMPLIES PRIMARILY THAT INDIVIDUALS EACHHAVE THEIR OWN PREFERENCES WHICH AFFECT THEDECISIONS THEY MAKE, AND THAT THOSE PREFERENCES MAYDIFFER FROM INDIVIDUAL TO INDIVIDUAL.
FOUR BASIC ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT INDIVIDUALBEHAVIOR ARE NORMALLY MADE:
– FIRST, INDIVIDUALS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SELF-INTERESTED(NOT EQUIVALENT TO “SELFISH”). THE ASSUMPTION OFSELF-INTEREST IMPLIES PRIMARILY THAT INDIVIDUALS EACHHAVE THEIR OWN PREFERENCES WHICH AFFECT THEDECISIONS THEY MAKE, AND THAT THOSE PREFERENCES MAYDIFFER FROM INDIVIDUAL TO INDIVIDUAL.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 64
PUBLIC CHOICE
– SECONDLY, INDIVIDUALS ARE ASSUMED TO BE RATIONAL.RATIONALITY IS DEFINED AS THE ABILITY TO RANK ALL KNOWNALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE TO THE INDIVIDUAL IN A TRANSITIVEMANNER.
– THIRD, INDIVIDUALS ARE ASSUMED TO ADOPT MAXIMIZINGSTRATEGIES. MAXIMIZATION AS A STRATEGY IMPLIES THECONSISTENT CHOICE OF THOSE ALTERNATIVES WHICH ANINDIVIDUAL THINKS WILL PROVIDE THE HIGHEST NET BENEFIT ASWEIGHED BY HIS OWN PREFERENCES. AT TIMES THE ASSUMPTIONOF MAXIMIZATION IS RELATED TO THAT OF SATISFYING,DEPENDING UPON ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE INFORMATIONAVAILABLE TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN A DECISION-MAKING SITUATION.
– SECONDLY, INDIVIDUALS ARE ASSUMED TO BE RATIONAL.RATIONALITY IS DEFINED AS THE ABILITY TO RANK ALL KNOWNALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE TO THE INDIVIDUAL IN A TRANSITIVEMANNER.
– THIRD, INDIVIDUALS ARE ASSUMED TO ADOPT MAXIMIZINGSTRATEGIES. MAXIMIZATION AS A STRATEGY IMPLIES THECONSISTENT CHOICE OF THOSE ALTERNATIVES WHICH ANINDIVIDUAL THINKS WILL PROVIDE THE HIGHEST NET BENEFIT ASWEIGHED BY HIS OWN PREFERENCES. AT TIMES THE ASSUMPTIONOF MAXIMIZATION IS RELATED TO THAT OF SATISFYING,DEPENDING UPON ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE INFORMATIONAVAILABLE TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN A DECISION-MAKING SITUATION.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 65
PUBLIC CHOICE
– FOURTH, AN EXPLICIT ASSUMPTION NEEDS TO BE STATEDCONCERNING THE LEVEL OF INFORMATION POSSESSED BY AREPRESENTATIVE INDIVIDUAL. THREE LEVELS HAVE BEENANALYTICALLY DEFINED AS INVOLVING CERTAINTY, RISK, ANDUNCERTAINTY.
– FOURTH, AN EXPLICIT ASSUMPTION NEEDS TO BE STATEDCONCERNING THE LEVEL OF INFORMATION POSSESSED BY AREPRESENTATIVE INDIVIDUAL. THREE LEVELS HAVE BEENANALYTICALLY DEFINED AS INVOLVING CERTAINTY, RISK, ANDUNCERTAINTY.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 66
PUBLIC CHOICE
THE CONDITION OF CERTAINTY IS DEFINED TO EXISTWHEN:
1) AN INDIVIDUAL KNOWS ALL AVAILABLESTRATEGIES;
2) EACH STRATEGY IS KNOWN TO LEAD INVARIABLYTO ONLY ONE SPECIFIC OUTCOME, AND;
3) THE INDIVIDUAL KNOWS HIS OWN PREFERENCESFOR EACH OUTCOME. GIVEN THIS LEVEL OFINFORMATION, THE DECISION OF A MAXIMIZINGINDIVIDUAL IS COMPLETELY DETERMINED.
THE CONDITION OF CERTAINTY IS DEFINED TO EXISTWHEN:
1) AN INDIVIDUAL KNOWS ALL AVAILABLESTRATEGIES;
2) EACH STRATEGY IS KNOWN TO LEAD INVARIABLYTO ONLY ONE SPECIFIC OUTCOME, AND;
3) THE INDIVIDUAL KNOWS HIS OWN PREFERENCESFOR EACH OUTCOME. GIVEN THIS LEVEL OFINFORMATION, THE DECISION OF A MAXIMIZINGINDIVIDUAL IS COMPLETELY DETERMINED.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 67
PUBLIC CHOICE
UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK, THE INDIVIDUAL IS STILLASSUMED TO KNOW ALL AVAILABLE STRATEGIES. ANYPARTICULAR STRATEGY MAY LEAD TO A NUMBER OFPOTENTIAL OUTCOMES, AND THE INDIVIDUAL ISASSUMED TO KNOW THE PROBABILITY OF EACHOUTCOME. THUS, DECISION MAKING BECOMESWEIGHTING PROCESS WHEREBY HIS PREFERENCES FORDIFFERENT OUTCOMES ARE COMBINED WITH THEPROBABILITY OF THEIR OCURRENCE PRIOR TO ASELECTION OF A STRATEGY.
UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK, THE INDIVIDUAL IS STILLASSUMED TO KNOW ALL AVAILABLE STRATEGIES. ANYPARTICULAR STRATEGY MAY LEAD TO A NUMBER OFPOTENTIAL OUTCOMES, AND THE INDIVIDUAL ISASSUMED TO KNOW THE PROBABILITY OF EACHOUTCOME. THUS, DECISION MAKING BECOMESWEIGHTING PROCESS WHEREBY HIS PREFERENCES FORDIFFERENT OUTCOMES ARE COMBINED WITH THEPROBABILITY OF THEIR OCURRENCE PRIOR TO ASELECTION OF A STRATEGY.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 68
PUBLIC CHOICE
DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY IS ASSUMEDTO OCCUR EITHER WHERE (1) AN INDIVIDUAL HAS AKNOWLEDGE OF ALL STRATEGIES AND OUTCOMES, BUTLACKS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE PROBABILITIES WITHWHICH A STRATEGY MAY LEAD TO AN OUTCOME, OR (2)AN INDIVIDUAL MAY NOT KNOW ALL STRATEGIES OR ALLOUTCOMES WHICH ACTUALLY EXIST.
DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY IS ASSUMEDTO OCCUR EITHER WHERE (1) AN INDIVIDUAL HAS AKNOWLEDGE OF ALL STRATEGIES AND OUTCOMES, BUTLACKS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE PROBABILITIES WITHWHICH A STRATEGY MAY LEAD TO AN OUTCOME, OR (2)AN INDIVIDUAL MAY NOT KNOW ALL STRATEGIES OR ALLOUTCOMES WHICH ACTUALLY EXIST.
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 69
PUBLIC CHOICE
UNDER CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY, THEDETERMINATENESS OF SOLUTIONS IS REPLACED BYCONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE RANGE OF POSSIBLE"SOLUTIONS."
ESTIMATIONS ARE MADE ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCESOF STRATEGIES.
(VINCENT OSBORNE & ELEANOR OSBORN, 1971)
UNDER CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY, THEDETERMINATENESS OF SOLUTIONS IS REPLACED BYCONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE RANGE OF POSSIBLE"SOLUTIONS."
ESTIMATIONS ARE MADE ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCESOF STRATEGIES.
(VINCENT OSBORNE & ELEANOR OSBORN, 1971)
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 70
PUBLIC CHOICE
PUBLIC CHOICE IS ONE OF A NUMBER OF MODELSOF DECISION-MAKING IN ADMINISTRATION.
OTHER MODELS INCLUDE:– RATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE MODEL;– BARGAINING MODEL;– INCREMENTAL MODEL;– PARTICIPATIVE MODEL.
(LEMAY, 2002)
PUBLIC CHOICE IS ONE OF A NUMBER OF MODELSOF DECISION-MAKING IN ADMINISTRATION.
OTHER MODELS INCLUDE:– RATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE MODEL;– BARGAINING MODEL;– INCREMENTAL MODEL;– PARTICIPATIVE MODEL.
(LEMAY, 2002)
S3-Unpas_2012 www.ginandjar.com 71
COOPERATIVE HUMANACTION
SOCIETY (SOCIETALINSTITUTIONS)
ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC PRIVATE
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION(STRUCTURE)
MANAGEMENT(FUNCTION)
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
www.ginandjar.com 72S3-Unpas_2012