developing research teams that link science and policy will allen [email protected]...

24
Developing research teams that link science and policy Will Allen [email protected] Collaborative Learning Group http:// social.landcareresearch.co.nz

Upload: magnus-reed

Post on 23-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Developing research teams that link science and policy

Will Allen [email protected]

Collaborative Learning Group http://social.landcareresearch.co.nz

• Changing context for science

• New science teams and measures of success

• Learning and learning together

• Adaptive management – skills, methods and roles

• Achieving rigor and legitimacy

Presentation outline

New Zealandtussock grasslands

Auckland

Hamilton

Wellington

Christchurch

SouthIslandhighcountry

Dunedin

New questions for science:

From production to sustainability

• Broader problem framing (negotiation/interpretation)

• Partnership approaches

• Integrated approaches

• Adaptive management (flexibility and uncertainty)

• Changing science – end user relationships

Decision making context

Moving beyond science ecologists:

Forming new science teams to link science with policy and management

Facilitator, co-learning specialist

Modelers

Scientist - deer ecology

Conservation manager

HuntersDOC: Project

manager

Scientists - forest ecology

How best to measure success ?

Of our restoration activities :

• Eradication of pests

• More effective restoration

How best to measure success ?

Or through a range of goals:

• Eradication of pests

• More effective restoration

• Relationship building between stakeholders (e.g. managers, DOC staff, iwi, scientists, NGOs, other gps)

• Better informed communities (e.g. managers, DOC staff, iwi, scientists, NGOs, other groups)

• Capacity building - A collaborative learning process and culture established among case-study areas

The experiential learning cycle

Reflecting/Reviewing (data)

Interpreting (information)

Planning & hypothesising (knowledge)

Experiencing (acting/doing)

“Learning that occurs only when people engage one another, sharing diverse perspectives and experiences to develop a common framework of understanding and basis for joint action”.

Exploring social learning in the development of collaborative natural resource management. (Thesis, 2001. Tania Marie Schusler)

Collaborative or social learning:

Negotiating goals, roles, perspectives and questions

Our on-the-ground situation

modeling and dialogue for understanding

Adapted management & policy actions

Monitoring & evaluation

(task & process)

Deciding on best activity sets

Access information (local, cultural and science)

New science – filling knowledge gaps

Adaptive management – “learning by doing”

Negotiating goals, roles, perspectives and questions

Our on-the-ground situation

modeling and dialogue for understanding

Adapted management & policy actions

Monitoring & evaluation

(task & process)

Deciding on best activity sets

Access information (local, cultural and science)

New science – filling knowledge gaps

Adaptive management – skills and methods

e.g. stakeholder analysis, conflict management, scenario

development

Our on-the-ground situation

modeling and dialogue for understanding

Adapted management & policy actions

Monitoring & evaluation

(task & process)

Deciding on best activity sets

New science – filling knowledge gaps

Access information (local, cultural and science)

Adaptive management – skills and methods

e.g. stakeholder analysis, conflict management, scenario

development

Our on-the-ground situation

modeling and dialogue for understanding

Adapted management & policy actions

Monitoring & evaluation

(task & process)

Deciding on best activity sets

New science – filling knowledge gaps

e.g. interviews, science reports, story telling

Adaptive management – skills and methods

e.g. stakeholder analysis, conflict management, scenario

development

Our on-the-ground situation

e.g. conceptual modeling, dialogue, simulations

Adapted management & policy actions

Monitoring & evaluation

(task & process)

Deciding on best activity sets

New science – filling knowledge gaps

e.g. interviews, science reports, story telling

Adaptive management – skills and methods

e.g. stakeholder analysis, conflict management, scenario

development

Our on-the-ground situation

e.g. conceptual modeling, dialogue, simulations

Adapted management & policy actions

Monitoring & evaluation

(task & process)

Everyone – together or back with their group

New science – filling knowledge gaps

e.g. interviews, science reports, story telling

Adaptive management – skills, methods & roles

e.g. stakeholder analysis, conflict management, scenario

development

Our on-the-ground situation

e.g. conceptual modeling, dialogue, simulations

Managers & policy makers

Monitoring & evaluation

(task & process)

Everyone – together or back with their group

Science: economics, ecology, hydrology, etc.

e.g. interviews, science reports, story telling

Adaptive management – skills, methods & roles

e.g. stakeholder analysis, conflict management, scenario

development

Our on-the-ground situation

e.g. conceptual modeling, dialogue, simulations

Managers & policy makers

pm&e, formative, network mapping,

etc

Everyone – together or back with their group

Science: economics, ecology, hydrology, etc.

e.g. interviews, science reports, story telling

Everyone

Adaptive management – skills, methods & roles

Managing integrated and interdisciplinary teams

• Takes time to build a common goal

• Understanding assumptions makes people more equal

• Need to meet individual goals if people are to stay in for the long haul

• Appreciate process and task

Learning across case studies:

Developing rigor

• Extracting generic lessons from single cases can be difficult

(e.g. one plot on the hill)

Cross-case analysis is better to:

• help us understand the variety of forms an intervention can take

• shed light on implementation issues

• increase confidence in the validity of findings

Learning across case studies:

Supporting legitimacy

• Building networks across disciplines, institutions, countries and regions

• Supporting communities of practice

• Making room and rewards for working in new ways

• More closely linking science and policy