developing dairy producer peer groups in kansas kristen schulte kevin dhuyvetter mike brouk rich...

26
Developing Dairy Producer Peer Groups in Kansas Kristen Schulte Kevin Dhuyvetter Mike Brouk Rich Llewelyn Kansas State University

Post on 19-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Developing Dairy Producer Peer Groups in Kansas

Kristen SchulteKevin Dhuyvetter

Mike BroukRich Llewelyn

Kansas State University

Kansas Dairy Industry

• 2010– 17th U.S. Milk Production• 0.4% increase in milk production since 2009• 9th in 3-year annual milk production growth

– 11th Milk pounds/cow/day• 21,000 rolling herd average

– 13th average herd size• 305 cows (119,000 total cows)

– 390 licensed herds

Progressive Dairyman, 2010 U.S. Dairy Statistics &USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Opportunities

• Variable dairy enterprise returns due to increase of volatility in milk and feed prices

• Structurally diverse dairy operation types between regions in Kansas

• Limited individual farm benchmark comparison for all types of dairies

• Risk management education to reduce financial risk

Objectives1. Provide benchmark measures so producers can

evaluate their own operations and make plans to change their operations based on this information

2. Assist producers in analyzing strengths and weaknesses of their operations

3. Evaluate how milk revenue relates to inputs in order to manage the financial and production related risks

4. Educate and provide peer-learning opportunities related to marketing, and herd, feed, and employee management

Peer Group MeetingQuarterly meetings comprised of two sections:• Benchmarking – report results for key production and financial

measures such as price, production, reproduction rates, culling rates, and feed prices.

– Individual and group statistical measures are reported allowing producers to benchmark their farm over time and to the group’s measures.

• General education – Topic chosen by the group such as marketing, new

aspects of production and technology, and feed management.

Timeline

Peer GroupYEAR QUARTER 1 2 3 42010 January - March maintain

April - June maintainJuly - September maintain announce annouceOctober - December maintain begin begin

2011 January - March maintain maintain maintainApril - June maintain maintain maintainJuly - September maintain maintain maintain announceOctober - December maintain maintain maintain begin

2012 maintain maintain maintain maintain

DAIRY PRODUCER PEER GROUP TIMELINE

Current Participation• 8-11 dairy operations per group• 3 producer peer groups – 29 total operations– 1 group with 6 quarters of data– 2 groups with 2 quarters of data

• Farm size range: ~100 – 700 cows• Industry support from local financial institution,

feed supplier, and veterinarian• Utilize Excel and Word to collect data via e-mail

correspondence with producers

Meeting Outline• 10:30 Welcome

• 10:45 – 12:15 Educational session(topics picked jointly by producers and KSU)

• 12:30 – 1:00 Lunch

• 1:15 – 2:30 Analysis of benchmark data and DHIA records

• 2:30 Farm tour

Meeting Preparation Outline

• Pre Meeting– Finalize quarterly meeting plans – E-mail reminder for meeting and submission of farm

benchmark input data– Collect, compile, and analyze farm benchmark data– Prepare benchmark reports for group and individual farms

• Post Meeting– Update farm data with changes highlighted in meeting– Prepare and send next quarters’ input data sheets– Follow-up with producers from prior meeting

Benchmark Data – Milk Production

• Record:– Entry comes directly from milk check– Lbs milk sold and used on farm– Milk price received (producer premiums and deductions)

• Output:– Milk shipped/cow/day– Milk income/cow/day– Component levels– Hauling cost/cwt milk– Milk price received

Producers enter milk check data into a spreadsheet each quarter (blue values are inputs, other values are calculated).

Benchmark Data – Herd Inventory• Record:– Total cow and heifer inventory– Number of cull animals– Transition cow complication frequency– Veterinary cost

• Output– Heifer-to-cow ratio– Cull rates (Cows: <60 and >60 DIM; abortion; stillborn;

Heifers:<2, 3-8, and >9 months)– Veterinary cost per head– Rate of transition cow complication

Producers enter monthly cow inventory data into a spreadsheet each quarter (blue values are inputs, other values are calculated).

Benchmark Data - Feed

• Lactating, dry, and transition cows• Record for each feed ingredient:– Value/ton– Dry matter percentage– Total pounds fed per group

• Output: – Pounds fed/cow, DM basis– Feed cost/cow/day– Feed cost/cwt shipped/day– Major feed component cost comparison– Income over feed cost

Producers enter monthly feed prices and quantities into a spreadsheet each quarter (blue values are inputs, other values are calculated) for each diet (up to four lactating diets, one transition cow diet, and one dry cow diet).

Benchmark Data - Reproduction

• Record:– Breeding rate per given 21-day interval– Pregnancy rate per given 21-day interval– Conception rate, number monthly services and successes

• Output (6 month average):– Breeding rate– Pregnancy rate– Conception rate per lactation and number of services

Producers enter monthly data regarding number of services and number of successful conceptions into a spreadsheet each quarter (blue values are inputs, other values are calculated).

Benchmark Data - Output• Statistical Analysis (group)– Average, maximum, minimum

• Farm Data– Current quarter– Prior quarter– Current quarter, historical year– Rolling year average

Benchmark Output

Benchmark Graph

Benchmark Graph

Benchmark Graph

Additional Education

• Feed inventory, shrink analysis

• Cost of production – corn silage

• Labor - hours per task category

• Educational sessions– Commodity markets and marketing options– Utilizing DHIA records in transition cow management– Vaccination protocols– SCC and udder health– Foot care roundtable

Concluding Thoughts

• Continuous learning and development of materials• Producers are still learning

(approximate two quarter learning curve)

• Feedback has been positive

• Time commitment bigger than anticipated(haven’t been able to get producers to provide leadership)

• Excel and email capabilities essential• Informal networking / camaraderie might be as

important as formal topics presented