detroit aftershocks will be staggering - ft

3
 J u ly 23, 2013 7:33 p m By Meredith Whitney s jarring as the reality may be to accept, Detroit’s decision last week to declare bankruptcy should not  be regarded as a one-off in t he US municipa l market –  which is what th e bond-peddlers ar e now telling their clients. The aftershocks of the largest municipal  bankruptcy in U S history will be st aggering, and Detroit  will set import ant precedent s. Municipal bankruptc ies have historically been rare for a number of reasons – including the states’ determinatio n to preserve their credit ratings, their access to cheap funding and the stigma of  bankruptcy . But, these days, thin gs are very differen t in the world of mun icipal finance.  At the root of the pr oblem is the inc entive system tha t elected officials used to face. For de cades, across the US, local leaders ran up tabs for future taxpayers; they promised pensions and other  benefits for publ ic employees th at have strong legal protection. That ha s been a great sour ce of patronage for elected officials: they can promise all sorts of future perks to loyal supporters (state and local workers) with very little accountability on the delivery of those promises. Today, we are left with the legacies of this waste. The bill for promises past is now so large for some cities and towns that it is crowding out money for the most basic of services – in the case of Detroit, it could not even afford to run its traffic lights. Across many American cities, cuts to basic social services have already been so deep that they have made the communities unpleasant places. This is, in part, because of a strange legal position. Over the past decade, US states’ finances have run deficits in more years than they have not. But, of the 50 states, 49 are constitutionally required to balance their budgets; quick cuts to social services were largely used to bridge the gaps. This meant delays in infrastructure projects, delays in basic maintenance of roads, bridges, and schools, cuts to school and higher education. This type of cut is allowed by state constitution s. But, under the same laws, cuts to pension and © Bloomberg Detroit aftershocks will be staggering - FT.com http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/34abcabc-f389-11e2-942f-00144feabdc0... 1 of 3 24-Jul-13 12:09 PM

Upload: matthew-cain

Post on 02-Apr-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

 

 J uly 23, 2013 7:33 pm

By Meredith Whitney

s jarring as the reality may be to accept, Detroit’s

decision last week to declare bankruptcy should not

 be regarded as a one-off in the US municipal market –

 which is what the bond-peddlers are now telling their

clients. The aftershocks of the largest municipal

 bankruptcy in US history will be staggering, and Detroit

 will set important precedents.

Municipal bankruptcies have historically been rare for a number of reasons – including the states’

determination to preserve their credit ratings, their access to cheap funding and the stigma of 

 bankruptcy. But, these days, things are very different in the world of municipal finance.

 At the root of the problem is the incentive system that elected officials used to face. For decades,

across the US, local leaders ran up tabs for future taxpayers; they promised pensions and other

 benefits for public employees that have strong legal protection. That has been a great source of 

patronage for elected officials: they can promise all sorts of future perks to loyal supporters (state

and local workers) with very little accountability on the delivery of those promises.

Today, we are left with the legacies of this waste. The bill for promises past is now so large for some

cities and towns that it is crowding out money for the most basic of services – in the case of Detroit,

it could not even afford to run its traffic lights. Across many American cities, cuts to basic social

services have already been so deep that they have made the communities unpleasant places.

This is, in part, because of a strange legal position. Over the past decade, US states’ finances have

run deficits in more years than they have not. But, of the 50 states, 49 are constitutionally required

to balance their budgets; quick cuts to social services were largely used to bridge the gaps. This

meant delays in infrastructure projects, delays in basic maintenance of roads, bridges, and schools,

cuts to school and higher education.

This type of cut is allowed by state constitutions. But, under the same laws, cuts to pension and

©Bloomberg

Detroit aftershocks will be staggering - FT.com http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/34abcabc-f389-11e2-942f-00144feabdc0...

1 of 3 24-Jul-13 12:09 PM

 

 Your leaders are reading

iPhone sales boost Apple shares Detroit will start a wave of municipal bankruptcies

 benefit costs or debt service payments are often not permitted. In other words, education and

public safety tend not to be safeguarded by constitutions but pensions and repayments on

municipal bonds are. So, over the past several years, basic social services have steadily eroded, and

in most cases home values have declined, crime rates have soared and education has suffered.

Rotten public services take a toll on home values and business investment alike. After all, what

makes one neighbourhood worth more than another is the perceived value advantage of its schools,

safety, public parks and libraries. Cuts in services happen even when taxes go up; the combination

acts to drive out businesses and other taxpayers from the area. This sets off the negative feedback 

loop from hell.

So leaders across the country cannot continue as they have. They must choose sides because there

is simply not enough money to go around. Will they side with taxpayers, unions or the municipal

 bondholders? If they back residents, money will be directed to underfunded public services at the

expense of pensions and bondholders. If they side with the unions, social services will continue to

 be cut and the risk to bondholders will increase considerably. If they side with bondholders, social

services and pensions are at risk.

Up to this point, it has taken either an incredibly daring elected official to stand up for taxpayers

or, in the case of Detroit, an appointed official (read “unelected”) whose mandate has been the

“emergency management” of the city. After decades of near-third-world conditions in the richest

country in the world, the city finally stood up and said enough was enough. Officials could raise

taxes further and cut social services deeper but leaders are finding these once “go-to” measures to

 be counterproductive. They are destructive to the very sustainability of the city.

Since the credit crisis, taxpayers have paid most dearly in terms of reduced social services while

paying the same or often higher tax bills. Increasingly, unions are being asked to make concessions

on pensions and benefits. And – now – bondholders, who up until last week thought they would be

protected in almost any scenario, are being forced to make a contribution to the fiscal problem.

Elected officials, for the first time in a very long time, are siding with residents. This is a new 

precedent that boils down to the straightforward reality of the survival and sustainability of a town

or city.

There are five more towns like Detroit in Michigan alone. There are many more municipalities

across the country in similar positions. Detroit’s decision last week paves the way for other elected

or non-elected officials to make decisions to save their cities and towns, decisions that probably 

involve politically unpopular actions that may secure their long-term viability.

The writer is author of ‘Fate of the States’ 

Detroit aftershocks will be staggering - FT.com http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/34abcabc-f389-11e2-942f-00144feabdc0...

2 of 3 24-Jul-13 12:09 PM

 

Printed from:

Print a single copy of this article for personal use. Contact us if you wish to print more to distribute to others.

© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2013 FT and ‘Financial Times’ are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.

Singapore funds benefit from Asian wealth

Bentley SUV gives £800m boost to UK car industry

Why peer-to-peer lending remains inherently unsafe

GlaxoSmithKline says Chinese laws might have been

violated

US banks now worth double Brics resource groups

Schäuble keeps quiet on mounting cost to Germany of 

Europe's woes

A Grexit is starting to look more feasible for Athens

With jobs, make sure it pays to play

 J apan's LDP wins sweeping victory in upper house poll

Swisscom chief executive found dead at home in

suspected suicide

 Time to get used to 'God Save the King' again

Hizbollah has become a state above the state

Finance: UBS

Facts finally collide with ideology on Europe

Israel: A bitter harvest

 J aguar family to grow with luxury cubs

Deutsche Bank set to shrink to hit leverage target

'Lucy Kellaway's History of Office Life'

Detroit aftershocks will be staggering - FT.com http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/34abcabc-f389-11e2-942f-00144feabdc0...

3 of 3 24-Jul-13 12:09 PM