determination of the existence of rock cavities method based on
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 4 (2016) pp 2932-2937
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
2932
Determination of the Existence of Rock Cavities Method Based on
Geoelectric Method (2D) in the Karangputih Hill Indarung
West Sumatra Indonesia.
Agus Santoso
Ph.D. Student, Physics Department, Gadjah Mada University, Geophysical Engineering, UPN "Veteran" University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Sismanto
Physics Department, FMIPA Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Ary Setiawan
Physics Department, FMIPA Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Subagyo Pramumijoyo
Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Indriati Retno Palupi
Geophysical Engineering, UPN "Veteran" University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Abstract
Geoelectric dipole dipole method (2D) is used to determine
the formations that are conducive in the earth, the purpose of
this study is to describe (configuration) geology below the
surface resistivity that is high in areas of potential is estimated
there are cavities in rocks.
In the method of dipole dipole resistivity electrical current
injected into the earth through the current electrode, then the
potential difference arising measured via two electrode
potential. From these measurements for different electrode
spacing can then be lowered resistivity variations in the price
of each of the layers below the measuring point.
Interpretation is done by software RES2DINV, the end result
that best represent each region will each be analyzed
geologically (qualitative) and quantitatively, the end result is:
the cavity below the surface can be determined based on the
amount of value resisitivitas rock> 6000 ohm meter, the
greater the resistivity then the greater the hollow cavity in the
rock. While the resistivity value Cracks have 4000-6000 ohm-
meter.
Keywords-Dipole dipole, cavity, geoelectric,, RES2DINV
program, resistivity
Introduction Geolistrik is a geophysical method that review the electricity
flow in the subsurface and how to detect it in the surface. In
this regard include the potential measurements, currents and
electromagnetic fields occur, either naturally or as a result of
current injection into the subsurface. There are many kinds of
geoelectric method, they are self potential method, teluric
current, magneto teluric, electro-magnetic, induced
polarization and resistivity (resistivity).
This method is done by sending a current into subsurface and
measure the voltage or potential that is legible on the surface,
in order to obtain resistivity between the layers of rock below
in the subsurface, and also the thickness of each layer of the
rock. The resistivity value than used as a base of rock
lithologic interpretation contained in the layer.
The final results showed hollow cavities in the subsurface as it
appears on the map of the 12 line are programmed. The
hollow cavities found in limestone of faulting result from the
collision of Indian plate and Australian plate [1].
Basic Theory The basic principle of geoelectric resistivity method is Ohm's Law. Resistivity value is obtained by measuring the potential
difference and the current that is passed in a medium.
I
VR
(1)
where R is the resistivity in ohms, V is potential difference in
Volt and I is the current in Ampere. Because the medium in
the subsurface is not homogenous (similar), then there is a
concept of resistivity Which depend on current and electrode
that depending on the installation of the potential and current
electrode configuration factor (k), in addition to the voltage
reading (V) and current that is sent (I).
I
Vk
(2)
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 4 (2016) pp 2932-2937
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
2933
Implementation of the resistivity method is sending the
current then measuring the potential with varied current and
potential electrode spacing. Thus the resistiviti’s value for
each range of current and potential electrode spacing is
obtained.
By plotting the resistiviti’s value versus the current electrode
spacing, then relationship between the current electrode
spacing (space) and resistivity is obtained.
Installation of Dipole-dipole electrodes Dipole-dipole electrode configuration. The current and
potential electrode separated by a distance na, where a is the
spacing or distance of each electrode [2].
V I
P1 C1O C2P2
anaa
Figure 1: Configuration of Dipole-dipole
To obtain configuration factor of dipole-dipole is like this
bellow:
C 1 P 1 = a + na = a (n + 1) ; C 1 P 2 = na
C 2 P 1 = a + na + a = a (n + 2) ;
C 2 P 2 = na + a = a (n + 1)
In the following equation is obtained as follows: 1
d)1n(a
1
na
1
)2n(a
1
)1n(a
12k
1
dna
1
)2n(a
1
)1n(a
22k
1
d)2n)(1n)(n(a
)2n)(1n()1n)(n()2n)(n(22k
1
222
)2)(1)((
23422
nnnannnnnnkd
1
)2)(1)((
22
nnnakd
)2n)(1n)(n(akd (3)
Geoelectricity Equipment The equipment used is :
1. Syscal R1 resistivity digital meters.
2. 4 rolls cable with more than 300 m length
3. Two electrode both for current and potential electrode
4. Accu 12 volt 60Ah
5. GPS (Global Positioning System)
6. Geological Hammer and compass
7. Meter measuring tool and topographic maps
The flowchart of Geoelectricity’s method can be seen in
Figure 2
Start
Design surveyGeology information
Calibration Instrumen
Filtering data
2D Profile
Interpretation
Finish
Res2Dinv Program
yes
no
.
.
Data Acquisition
Figure 2: Flowchart of Geolectricitiy method
The Data Acquisition Preliminary investigations were carried out is the collection of
secondary data such as geological data, the publication of
West Sumatra on the composition of rocks and minerals as
well as other supporting data. Prior to the acquisition of data,
then the equipment must be calibrated so that it meets the
standard operating procedures.
Difficulties and obstacles encountered in the field is the rainy
season and the hilly terrain that is too steep, making it difficult
mobilization of equipment in the field, so the track is designed
very difficult. The rainy season resulting watery or muddy
ground, so it is difficult for an electric current conduct into the
ground, so it is necessary to use CuSO4.
In this investigation the data were recorded and measured in
the field are [3] :
Note No location, azimuth and Geographic Location.
measured: The range of electrode currents, The range of
potential electrode, a current flows, as well as the apparent
resistivity (ohm-m). The tools used in this measurement is
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 4 (2016) pp 2932-2937
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
2934
reading digitally, which could determine the course of the
current injected, so that it can be seen when disturbed flow is
happened.
General Geology The oldest rocks exposed in Indarung and around it is include
to Pre-Tertiary age (Yura) comprising groups of metamorphic
rocks that generally underlies the hills and ridge-the ridge of
this area[1]. The rock group composed of sandstones meta,
meta siltstone and mudstone associated with filit tufa which
mixed and crystalline limestones group is marmeran / solid
(crystalline).
Furthermore, above of group Pre-Tertiary rocks, the group of
Tertiary volcanic rocks is deposited by quaternary and
quaternary sediment [4], for quaternary Tertiary volcanic
deposits consist of lava flows interlude with andesite flows
and tuffs crystal that hard / solid and cemented well. For
quaternary sediment is from sediment alluvial fan, which is
the result of destruction of volcanic sediment[5] and it is the
youngest alluvial deposits composed of igneous rock
boulders, Krakal, and gravel loose sand.
Geological structure of the main encountered in the vicinity of
the probe is sliding down (normal) fault with east-west
direction and some almost North-South direction.
Data Processing Based on the results of the final analysis performed by
computer programs, and also supported local and regional
geological data area of research, then the final result is
obtained that the depth which correlated with the magnitude
of the actual resistivity ("True resistivity") of the rocks were
split into several rocks as follows:
1. Covers (Soil). Resistiviti’s value ranging from 50 to
more than 1000 Ohm meters, consisting of loose sand,
marl, silt, gravel and gravel.
2. Unit of clay / marl Resistiviti’s value less than 10 ohm-
m, consisting of marl. Generally permeable.
3. Unit of calcareous sand Resistiviti’s value range form 10
to 100 ohm-m, comprises calcareous sandstones are
generally a result of clastic limestone sediment volcanic
eruption.
4. Unit of Limestone with sand. Resistiviti’s value range
from 100 to 200 ohm-m, consist of limestone that has
the size like sand-a bit rough.
5. Unit of Limestone Resistiviti’s value range from 200 to
500 ohm-m, consist of limestone with fragments of
limestone boulders with size of 5-10 mm, matrix of sand
and carbonate cement.
6. Unit of compact Limestone Resistiviti’s value range
from 500 to 1500 ohm-meters. Consist of compact
fragments of limestone boulders with size range from 50
to 100 cm, matrix calcareous sand, cement carbonate.
7. Igneous rocks Resistiviti’s value range from 1500 to
4000 ohm-m, igneous basalt dominantly.
8. The cavity-the cavity in the limestone. Resistiviti’s value
> 60 00 ohm meter, the greater resistivity make greater
the cavities in the rock. While the cracks have
Resistiviti’s value of 4000-6000 ohm-m.
Interpretation Interpretation is based on Computer program, then take the
final result that take from best represent of each region and
will each be analyzed geologically (qualitative) and
quantitatively, the end result is as follows[6] :
Table 1: Coordinates of Line 1 to line 12
LINE AZIMUTH
X point 0 meter Y point 0 meter X point 500 meterY poijnt 500 meter
Line - 01 N 180 E 664057 9892332 664057 9891846
Line - 02 N 180 E 664107 9892332 664107 9891846
Line - 03 N 180 E 664157 9892332 664157 9891846
Line - 04 N 180 E 664207 9892332 664207 9891846
Line - 05 N 180 E 664257 9892332 664257 9891846
Line - 06 N 180 E 664307 9892332 664307 9891846
Line - 07 N 180 E 664357 9892332 664357 9891846
Line - 08 N 180 E 664407 9892332 664407 9891846
Line - 09 N 180 E 664457 9892332 664457 9891846
Line - 10 N 180 E 664507 9892332 664507 9891846
Line - 11 N 180 E 664557 9892332 664557 9891846
Line - 12 N 180 E 664607 9892332 664607 9891846
UTM coordinates
Line 1:
Rongga
Rongga
Retakan
Retakan
Batuan beku
Batuan beku
Batuan beku
Batugamping
Figure 3: Resistivity section of Line 1
Composed of igneous rocks, limestones and sandstones. Voids
and cracks found in space of 20 to 260 m with the depth> 80
m, the cavity also found in space of 450 to 480 m with the
depth> 80 m, at a shallow depth (3 m) is also found the cavity
in space of 405 to 415 m. There are existence of two normal
faults that form a graben
Line 2 :
Rongga
Rongga
Rongga
Batuan Beku
Batugamping
Batugamping
Figure 4: Resistivity section of Line 2
Cavities are found at the beginning and middle of the track in
space of 0 to 15 m, 140 to 280 m with the depths> 75 m and at
the end of the track in the space of 390 to 410 m, with the
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 4 (2016) pp 2932-2937
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
2935
shallow depth of 3-10 m. Igneous rocks and limestone are
dominantly.
Line 3 :
Rongga
Rongga
Figure 5: Resistivity section of Line 3
Cavities found in space of 160-230 m with the depths> 80 m,
while at shallow depths (5 m) cavities found in space of 212
to 214 m, 235 to 237 and 292 to 296 m, voids at shallow
depths forming many cavities with the diameter of 5 cm.
Limestone and igneous rocks that are separated by the normal
faults.
Line 4 :
Rongga
RetakanRongga
Figure 6: Resistivity section of Line 4
Cavity contained in the initial trajectory of 0-5 m, with a
depth of 15-25 m, and at 330-360 m with a depth> 80 m,
while the cracks are in the 304-307 at a depth of 10-15 m, the
shape of the holes that fractured / cracks. Limestone and
igneous rocks that are separated by the normal faults.
Line 5 :
Batuan Beku
Batuan Beku
Batuan Beku
Batugamping
Batugamping
Figure 7: Resistivity section of Line 5
There are no cavities.
Line 6 :
Rongga
Rongga
Rongga
Figure 8: Resistivity section of Line 6
Cavities are found at the beginning of the track in space of 7
to 12 m with a depth of 5 m. At the mid of the track exactly
located in space of 260 to 265 m, with the depth depth> 60 m,
also in space of 320-340 m with the depth> 85 m, and in the
space of 410 to 420 m with a depth> 85 m, there are cavities
founded too. There are three normal Fault, whereas the normal
faults are thought to exist at the beginning of the track.
Line 7 :
Elevation Retakan
Batugamping
Batuan Beku
Batuan BekuBatupasir
Batugamping
BatugampingBatuan Beku
Figure 9: Resistivity section of Line 7
There are no cavities, but cracks are found at the near of
surface of the rocks contained in space of 234 to 238 m with a
depth of 5 m, also in space of 290 to 380 m with the depth of
5 m.
Line 8 :
Elevation
Batuan beku
Batuan beku
Batuan beku
Batugamping
Batugamping
Batupasir
Batugamping
Figure 10: Resistivity section of Line 8
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 4 (2016) pp 2932-2937
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
2936
There are no cavity, but cracks are found in the space of 50 to
60 m with a depth of 20 m. Large cracks found in space of
380 to 425 m with the depth of 30 to 90 m.
Line 9 :
Elevation
Batugamping
Retakan
Retakan
Rongga
160
Batuan BekuBatuan Beku
Batugamping
Figure 11: Resistivity section of Line 9
Cavities are found in space of 285-290 m with teh depth of 5
m, in space of 295 to 305 with the depths of> 30 m and in
space of 405 to 417 with the depths> 30 m. Cracks found in
space of 0 to 10 m with the depth> 80 m and in space of 85 to
100 m with the depth of 10 m.
Line 10 :
DETEKSI RONGGA-RONGGA DALAM TANAH Line - 09. PT SEMEN PADANG (Karang putih)
Elevation
x=y=
x=y=
Retakan Rongga
160
Elevation
Batuan Beku
Batuan Beku
Batuan Beku
Batugamping
Batugamping
Batugamping
Figure 12: Resistivity section of Line 10
There are no cavities or cracks.
Line 11 :
160
ElevationRongga
Rongga
Batuan bekuGamping pasiranBatuan beku
Batugamping
Figure 13: Resistivity section of Line 11
The cavities are found in space of 220 to 230 m, with the
shallow depth of 5 m, and the cavity is also present in space of
300 to 330 m, with the depth> 85 m. Igneous rocks, limestone
and sandy limestone are dominantly
Line 12 :
Elevation
160
Retakan Retakan
Batupasir
Batugamping
Batuan beku
Ba
tu b
ek
u
Batuan beku
Figure 14: Resistivity section of Line 12
There are no cavities,but there are cracks in 5 places in the
space of 85 to 100 with the depth of 15 m, in space of 120 to
130 m with the depth of 5 m, in space of 150 to 160 m with
the depth depth of 10 m, in space of 245 to 255 with the depth
of 10 m and in space of 290 to 310 m with the depth> 50 m.
Figure 15: Cavity Survey Map in research location
Cavity large enough form caves (Figure 15 with red color) is
the limestone cave with the depth > 50 meters
Conclusion 1. The dominant composition of rocks consist of Limestone
with Oligocene-Miocene age, sandy limestone, marl and
massive limestone mixed with igneous basalt that result
from collision plate between Asia and the Australian.
There are cavities in the fractured of the cracks forming
the cavities with small diameter of 2 to 5 cm.
2. Interpretation Cavities [7] : Cavities are in line 1, 2, 3 and
4. Line-01: Cavities are at depths of > 50 m, the cavity is
formed cave associated with line 2, 3 and stopped at line 4.
At the beginning of the line the cave only at line 1 and 2.
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 4 (2016) pp 2932-2937
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
2937
3. The existence of interconnected caves form a pattern of
underground rivers that flow from the NW-SE that are
characteristic of karts topography
References
[1] Kustowo and Gerhard 1973 "beginning Geological
Survey cement plant Indarung Padang, West Sumatra"
Not published.
[2] Keller, GV and Frischkenect, FC, 1970, "Electrical
Methods in Geophysical Prospecting", pp 17-166,
Pergamont Press, New York
[3] Dobrin, M, B & SAVIT, CH 1988, "Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting", Mc Graw Hill Co., Fourth
edition, New York, San Francisco
[4] Van Bemmelen, RW., 1949. The Geology of Indonesia, Vol IA. Government Printing Office, The Hague, 732 h.
[5] Cas, RAF, and Wright, JV, 1987. Volcanic Succession: Modern and Ancient, Allen & Unwin, London, 534 p.
[6] Telford, W, M, Geldart, LP, Sheriff, R, E & Keys, D, A,
1976, "Applied Geophysics" Canbridge University Press,
New York, London, Melbourne
[7] Grant, F, S. & West, G, F, 1965, "Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics", Mc Graw Hill Co., New York,
San Francisco, Toronto, London, Sydney.