determination of magnetic moments in metal-metal bonded complexes daniel villanueva 1 1 the johns...

8
Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore, MD

Upload: jonas-hardy

Post on 22-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore,

Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal

Bonded Complexes

Daniel Villanueva1

1The Johns Hopkins University

Department Of Chemistry

Baltimore, MD

Page 2: Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore,

Background Information / Introduction

• The idea that metal atoms could individually bond to other metal atoms was one that arose comparatively late in the development of inorganic chemistry

• It was not until 1913 that a compound was discovered to have a metal-metal bond

• Compounds are currently known containing not only metal-metal single bonds, but also double, triple, and even quadruple bonds

Page 3: Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore,

Problem / Hypothesis

• Rhodium(II) acetate ethanolate and copper(II) acetate monohydrate were synthesized and characterized using Infrared Spectroscopy (IR) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), to determine specific bonding and their magnetic moments respectively. These magnetic moments were used to determine if a metal-metal bond exists.

Page 4: Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore,

Experimental Procedure• Part A: Rhodium(II) Acetate Ethanolate

– 50mg of rhodium(III) chloride hydrate, 100mg of sodium acetate trihydrate, 1mL of glacial acetic acid, & 1mL of absolute ethanol were refluxed for 1 hour

• Part B: Copper(II) Acetate Monohydrate– 160mg of copper(II) sulfate, 1mL of ammonia,

& 80mg of sodium hydroxide flakes were stirred and heated for 25 minutes

• IR & NMR spectra were collected• Coaxial NMR tube (See Figure 3) → Inner

Tube: sample + DMSO; Outer Tube: only DMSO

Figure 3: Coaxial NMR Tube

Page 5: Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore,

Results• Rhodium(II) Acetate Ethanolate

– Blue-green crystals– IR Spectrum: C-H bond (2904cm-1),

O-C-O bond (1720cm-1)

• Copper(II) Acetate Monohydrate– Deep blue crystals– IR Spectrum: C-H bond (2950cm-1),

O=C (1736cm-1), C-O bond (1260cm-1)

Figure 1: Structure of rhodium(II) acetate alcoholate [L = ethanol]

Figure 2: Structure of copper(II) acetate monohydrate

Page 6: Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore,

Results

NMR Spectrum Of Rhodium(II)

Acetate Ethanolate

NMR Spectrum Of Copper(II)

Acetate Monohydrate

Signal of solvent protons in outer tube

Signal of solvent protons in inner tube

Signal of solvent protons in outer tube

Signal of solvent protons in inner tube

Page 7: Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore,

Discussion Of Results• The nuclei of the NMR solvent in the two compartments

are shielded differently due to the different volume susceptibility

• Resulting shift difference of the absorption signals is related to the magnetic moment, μ, of the paramagnetic substance in the inner tube

• μ = a√(T∆ν/c) *a = constant (2522x10-4 mol1/2K-1/2ml-1/2cps-1/2; T = absolute

temperature; ∆ν = shift difference (in cps) [1ppm = 10cps]; c = concentration of solute

• Rhodium(II) acetate ethanolate:– T = 293.8K; ∆ν = 8.35cps; c = 4.1404x10-5mol/ml– μ = 1.941 Bohr magnetons– Rh-Rh bond exists because the magnetic moment is small

• Copper(II) Acetate Monohydrate– T = 293.8K; ∆ν = 11.45cps; c = 2.5247x10-5mol/ml– μ = 2.599 Bohr magnetons– Cu-Cu bond is absent because the magnetic moment is large

Page 8: Determination Of Magnetic Moments In Metal-Metal Bonded Complexes Daniel Villanueva 1 1 The Johns Hopkins University Department Of Chemistry Baltimore,

Conclusion• Rhodium(II) acetate ethanolate contains a

metal-metal bond• The unpaired electrons of rhodium(II) (d7)

are strongly coupled and the complex is diamagnetic

• Copper(II) acetate monohydrate does NOT contain a Cu-Cu bond

• The unpaired electrons of copper(II) (d9) are weakly coupled and the highly populated low energy excited state is paramagnetic