detecting & improving medication use among vulnerable elders: a community-based medication...
TRANSCRIPT
Detecting & Improving Medication Use Among Vulnerable Elders:
A Community-Based Medication Management Intervention
Gretchen AlkemaVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
Kathleen WilberUSC Andrus Gerontology Center
June Simmons, Sandy Atkins, Mira Trufasiu, & Dennee FreyPartners in Care Foundation
Gerontological Society of America MeetingNovember 19, 2007
AcknowledgementsCollaborators
USC Andrus Gerontology CenterKathleen Wilber, PhD
Partners in Care FoundationDennee Frey, PharmDJune Simmons, CEO/LCSWMira Trufasiu, MSGSandy Atkins, MPASusan Enguidanos, PhD
Huntington Hospital Senior Care NetworkEileen Koons, LCSWLois Zagha, MFT
Funding Support
Administration on Aging Evidence-Based Prevention Initiative (#90AM2778)
John A. Hartford Foundation Doctoral Fellows Program in Geriatric Social Work
AARP Scholars Program
VA Postdoctoral Fellowship (#TPP 65-007)
Problem of Medication Errors 65+ = 12% of population but consume ⅓ of all drugs
19 - 48% elders in community w/ med-related problems
7,000 deaths annually by adverse drug events
Associated hospital costs = $2 billion
¼ of adverse drug events are preventable
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)in a New Setting
Implemented tested medication management protocols from:
Medicare home healthcare RCT
to…
Medi-Cal waiver care management
Home Healthcare Context
Site: Medicare-certified home healthcare
Population: 65+ w/ skilled nursing need & MD orders
Staff: Nurses w/ pharmacist support
Length of Stay: Up to 6 weeks
Contact: Up to daily visits
Care Management Context
Site: Medi-Cal waiver care management
Population: 65+ dual eligibles w/ functional impairment
Staff: Nurses & social workers w/ pharmacist support
Length of stay: 1 month to 3+ years
Contact: Phoned monthly & quarterly home visit
Care Management Sample (N=615) Site #1: n=216
Site #3: n=126
Site #2: n=273
Targeted Medication Problems (Brown et al., 1998, Meredith et al., 2001)
1. Unnecessary therapeutic duplication
2. Psychotropic drug use w/ confusion or falls
3. Cardiovascular medication problems
4. Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with peptic ulcer risk
Research Design
Time 1 Time 2
3 Months
Prevalence
1. Screen for medication problems using theHome Health Criteria
2. Pharmacist confirms problem
3. If Yes, Pharmacist & CM develop care plan
4. Contact prescribing MD
5. CM discusses problem & solution with participant and/or caregiver
6. CM follow up to identify changes
· Was medication problem resolved?
· If yes, what was changed?
· If no, why not & follow up plan?
Research Design
Time 1 Time 2
3 Months
Prevalence
1. Screen for medication problems using theHome Health Criteria
2. Pharmacist confirms problem
3. If Yes, Pharmacist & CM develop care plan
4. Contact prescribing MD
5. CM discusses problem & solution with participant and/or caregiver
6. CM follow up to identify changes
· Was medication problem resolved?
· If yes, what was changed?
· If no, why not & follow up plan?
Research Design
Time 1 Time 2
3 Months
Prevalence
1. Screen for medication problems using theHome Health Criteria
2. Pharmacist confirms problem
3. If Yes, Pharmacist & CM develop care plan
4. Contact prescribing MD
5. CM discusses problem & solution with participant and/or caregiver
6. CM follow up to identify changes
· Was medication problem resolved?
· If yes, what was changed?
· If no, why not & follow up plan?
Care Management Sample (N=615)
81 years old
80% female
53% widows
40% lived alone
36% new to care management
Photo by Rollin Riggs, NY Times
Race/Ethnicity by Site (N=615)
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
Caucasian African-American
Latino/a Asian/PI Other
Site #1
Site #2
Site #3
Language Preference (N=615)
Other11%
Chinese2%
Armenian6%
Spanish22%
English59%
Health Status (N=615)
Mean # of meds = 8.76 (SD=4.3); 12+ meds = 22%
38% ED, Hospital, or SNF in previous year
22% falls in previous 3 months
27% dizziness
31% confusion
Screened 3 MSSP Sites using Home Health Criteria:
615 Participants
Screened 3 MSSP Sites using Home Health Criteria:
615 Participants
Potential Medication Problems:
299 Participants (49%)
No Potential Problems:316 Participants (51%)
Screened 3 MSSP Sites using Home Health Criteria:
615 Participants
Potential Medication Problems:
299 Participants (49%)
Confirmed Medication Problems:
181 Participants (29%)
Problem Not Confirmed: 118 Participants· False Positive: 83 · Unconfirmed: 25· Terminated from MSSP: 10
No Potential Problems:316 Participants (51%)
Pharmacist Review
Screened 3 MSSP Sites using Home Health Criteria:
615 Participants
Potential Medication Problems:
299 Participants (49%)
Confirmed Medication Problems:
181 Participants (29%)
Problem Not Confirmed: 118 Participants· False Positive: 83 · Unconfirmed: 25· Terminated from MSSP: 10
No Potential Problems:316 Participants (51%)
Pharmacist Review
Terminated from MSSP: 19 Participants
Intervention Group:162 Participants (26.3%)
Screened 3 MSSP Sites using Home Health Criteria:
615 Participants
Potential Medication Problems:
299 Participants (49%)
Confirmed Medication Problems:
181 Participants (29%)
Problem Not Confirmed: 118 Participants· False Positive: 83 · Unconfirmed: 25· Terminated from MSSP: 10
No Potential Problems:316 Participants (51%)
Pharmacist Review
Terminated from MSSP: 19 Participants
Intervention Group:162 Participants (26.3%)
3-Month Follow Up forMedication Improvement:
99 Participants
(61% of Intervention Group)
Attrition
10 left before med problems confirmed ↑ fallers (p<.05)
100% w/ 1+ potential problem (p<.001)
19 left before intervention completed ↓ # of meds (p<.05)
Main reasons: LTC, died, or moved
Prevalence Results (N=615)
Potential Confirmed
Medication Problem N % N %
Any 299 48.6% 181 29.4%
Ther. Duplication 149 24.2% 87 14.1%
Psychotropic 88 14.3% 65 10.6%
Cardiovascular 87 14.1% 27 4.4%
NSAIDs 79 12.8% 53 8.6%
Associated Characteristics
Any problems ~ ↑ age, new enrollment, & ↑ meds
2+ problems ~ ↑ meds
Therapeutic duplication ~ ↑ meds
Psychotropic ~ living w/ someone, new enrollment, ED/hospital/SNF, & ↑ meds
Cardiovascular ~ new enrollment
Problems by # Meds
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1-3 4-6 7-9 10-11 12+
# of Medications
% o
f S
amp
le
AllProblems***
2+Problems***
TherapeuticDuplication***
Psychotropicw/ Falls*
Screening to
InterventionMedication Change
at 3 Months
(N=615) (N=162)
Medication Problem N % N % ∆
Any 162 26.3% 99 61.1%
Ther. Duplication 79 12.8% 49 62.0%
Psychotropic 59 9.6% 23 67.6%
Cardiovascular 24 3.9% 11 45.8%
NSAIDs 44 7.2% 22 50.0%
Intervention Results (N=162)
Staff Comments “As a SW, I became aware of potential dangers
or complications of some medications; I now look at all medications my clients are taking”
“No or slow response from the doctor…some clients have taken certain medications for so long that they were unwilling / fear to change”
“Uncomfortable addressing this issue with MDs ~ feel it is beyond my scope of practice”
Conclusions
Med problems highly prevalent in Medi-Cal waiver sample
Intervention successful in care management
Critical need for meds management across continuum of care
Payment sources for meds management
Next Steps Disseminate Medication Management Improvement
System ~ funded by Hartford Foundation
Computerized screening for potential problems Integration into MSSPCare (by RTZ Associates) Stand alone online version & algorithm for other software
Statewide replication in MSSPCare sites
National replication -- 2+ states NCOA Readiness Tool Seeking potential sites for 2008
Photo by JL Forter