verge are to be protected through the installation of a Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Each TPZ is to be installed as per Australian Standard AS4970-2009 and in accordance with the following criteria to the satisfaction of the City: • A free-standing mesh fence erected around each street tree with a

minimum height of 1.8m and a 2m minimum radius measured from the outside of the trunk of each tree.

• If an approved crossover, front fence, footpath, road or similar is located within the 2m radius, the TPZ fencing shall be amended to be the minimum distance necessary to allow the works to be completed.

• Fixed signs are to be provided on all visible sides of the TPZ fencing clearly stating ‘Tree Protection Zone – No Entry’.

• The following actions shall not be undertaken within any TPZ: - Storage of materials, equipment fuel, oil dumps or chemicals - Servicing and refuelling of equipment and vehicles - Attachment of any device to any tree (including signage, temporary

service wires, nails, screws, winches or any other fixing device) - Open-cut trenching or excavation works (whether or not for laying of

services) - Changes to the natural ground level of the verge - Location of any temporary buildings including portable toilets - The unauthorised entry by any person, vehicle or machinery

• No unauthorised pruning of the canopy or roots of any Street Tree is permissible under the City of Melville’s Street Tree Policy CP-029. Pruning may only be undertaken by the City’s approved contractors following a written submission to and approval by the City.

• Once erected to the required standard, the TPZ shall be maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the City and may only be removed upon occupation of the development.

26. Prior to the commencement of each stage of the development as described in

the Construction Management Plan, detailed plans of any proposed changes to trees, landscaping, reticulation or street furniture in the Almondbury Road, Riseley Street, Davy Street and Marmion Street road reserves associated with the stage shall submitted to and approved in writing by the City. The timing of these works shall be details in the approved Construction Management Plan.

The plans shall include a proposed maintenance programme and identify the responsibilities of the landowner and/or the City in discharging these maintenance obligations.

29. Prior to the commencement of each stage of the development as described in the Construction Management Plan, details for the provision of any external ‘street furniture’ associated with the stage shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the City. These details shall include, but not be limited to, the provision of seating; bike racks; shelters; bin surrounds and planter boxes.

32. Temporary structures, such as prefabricated or demountable offices, portable

toilets and skip bins necessary to facilitate storage, administration and construction activities are permitted to be installed within the property boundaries of the subject site(s) for the duration of the construction period. These structures are to be located so not to obstruct vehicle sight lines of the subject site, the adjacent road network or of adjoining properties to the

Page 3

satisfaction of the City and unless otherwise agreed are to be removed prior to occupation of the whole development.

All other conditions and requirements detailed on the previous approval dated 18 December 2015 and 3 April 2017 shall remain unless altered by this application. Details: outline of development application Insert Zoning MRS: Urban TPS: City Centre Insert Use Class: Betting Agency, Car Park, Cinema / Theatre,

Consulting Rooms, Convenience Store, Fast Food Outlet, Health Centre, Market, Medical Centre, Motor Vehicle Wash, Office, Restaurant / Café, Shop, Small Bar and Tavern’

Insert Strategy Policy: N/A Insert Development Scheme: N/A Insert Lot Size: 17.66ha Insert Existing Land Use: Betting Agency, Car Park, Cinema / Theatre,

Consulting Rooms, Convenience Store, Fast Food Outlet, Health Centre, Market, Medical Centre, Motor Vehicle Wash, Motor Vehicle Repair, Office, Restaurant / Café, Shop, Melville Civic Centre including library and main hall.

The Form 2 application lodged by the applicant aims to facilitate the following modifications: 1. Relocation of car parking bays and reduction in total number of bays. 2. Changes to vehicle access and loading. 3. Increase in floorspace 4. Minor changes to the High Street elevations and floorplans. 5. Modification of conditions 2,3,9,20,24,25,26,29 and 32 and deletion of

Condition 8. The comparison table provided on pages 5 to 12 of the applicant’s supporting report (Attachment 1) a visual demonstration of the changes proposed. The modifications are generally considered to be minor in nature and able to be dealt with as a Form 2. Background: Conditional Planning Approval for the redevelopment of the Garden City Shopping Centre in Booragoon was granted by the Metro Central JDAP on 18 December 2015. Further to this, an extension of time request was approved by the Metro Central JDAP in April 2017. Legislation & policy: Legislation Planning and Development Act 2005

Page 4

Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011 Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 City of Melville Local Planning Scheme No. 6 Melville City Centre Structure Plan State Government Policies Not applicable to proposed extension of time application. Local Policies LPP1.1 Planning Process & Decision Making Council Policy CP-034 Road Safety Audit Policy Consultation: Public Consultation None undertaken for this Form 2 application. Consultation with other Agencies or Consultants None undertaken for this Form 2 application. Planning assessment: Officer Comments

• Relocation of car parking bays and reduction in total number of bays. Clause 10.1.5 of the Melville City Centre Structure Plan states that a maximum of 5 car parking bay per 100m2 shall be provided for non-residential floorspace. 5958 car parking bays were provided for 126,891m2 of non-residential floorspace in the original planning approval, providing a ratio of approximately 4.7 bays per 100m2. The Form 2 application will see a reduction in the total number to 5486 car parking bays for 128,034m2 non-residential floorspace, a ratio of approximately 4.3 bays per 100m2. The proposed number of bays is less than the maximum set out in the Structure Plan and is supported on that basis. As a part of the original application a significant number of car parking bays were provided at the basement level. The Form 2 application proposes to relocate car parking from the basement to within mezzanine levels that are now proposed within the car parking structures themselves, with more bays provided on the roof top areas of those structures. The proposed parking location is within the approved built form with no impact on the streetscape. The revised car parking location is supported by the City.

Page 5

• Vehicle Access and Loading The applicant proposes to provide a ramp on the southern, Marmion Street, side of the development, to enable direct access to car parking on level 1. It is also proposed to provide a dedicated servicing/loading area via Marmion Street. These changes are considered to improve the functionality of the design and are supported on that basis. • Modification of floor space Minor increase in floor space to increase from 126,861 to 128,034 = 1173m2 representing less than 1% of total proposed area. Clause 8.1 states that retail floor space (excluding food and beverage) within the structure plan should not exceed 120,000m2. The executive summary, providing in the applicant’s supporting report indicates that approximately 10,000m2 of the total proposed floorspace will be non-retail space including 6000m2 cinema and 3-4000m2 of food and beverage uses. The minor increase in total floorspace is supported by the City on the basis that the retail floorspace component proposed is consistent with Clause 8.1. • Modification of High Street The proposed modifications are generally supported by the City. The changes proposed to the elevational treatment of buildings that front the proposed High Street are designed to deliver a disaggregated built form, providing a varied design pallete across a number of different buildings, which breaks up the elevation. The resultant modified elevations will be more interesting and visually appealing. It is noted that detailed drawings are required to be submitted for approval of the City prior to the commencement of this stage. Changes to conditions

• Amend Condition 2 The applicant proposes to amend condition 2, to remove the requirement for the Norma Road/Canning Highway intersection to be upgraded. Clause 9 of the structure plan indicates that a number of key peripheral intersections should be upgraded within 5 years of the operation of the retail floorspace expansion. In relation to Norma Road/Canning Highway intersection the structure plan indicates that traffic signals shall be provided. Since the adoption of the Structure Plan, Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) has indicated that it does not support the provision of traffic lights in this location, the applicant is therefore unable to progress to the detailed design stage for the intersection upgrade. The City is liaising with MRWA to determine an alternative intersection design as a part of broader planning for this locality however an agreement has not yet been reached. The City is therefore supportive of the condition being modified.

• Amend Condition 3 The applicant proposes to amend condition 3 to remove the requirement for a road safety audit to be prepared. The City does not support this amendment.

Page 6

This amendment is not supported by the City for the reasons outlined below. A Road Safety Audit is necessary for internal as well as external roads as:

1. The internal network including carparks and the new ‘Garden Street’ essentially act as a mini road network which needs to be audited to ensure it is safe for all road users.

2. The internal road network caters for a high volume of pedestrians interacting with car movements which introduces a high risk of pedestrian crashes if not designed in the safest manner.

3. There is a duty of care to ensure the design does not introduce unforeseen safety issues into a public area which results in crashes and possible injuries to the public.

4. Retrofitting a road to remove safety issues is more expensive than adjusting plans before construction commences.

5. Although the project may be designed by experienced road designers these professionals are not necessarily experts in road safety engineering or crash investigation therefore a road safety audit by an accredited Senior Road Safety auditor and their team is best practice to ensure the internal network design does not introduce unacceptable road safety risks.

The Austroads Guidelines –Guide to Road Safety Part 6: Road Safety Audit - section 1.4 Road Safety Audit is More than Checking Standards provides an analysis of the benefits of a road safety audit. An extract of the relevant section is provided below.

1.4 Road Safety Audit is More than Checking Standards

Standards are an important starting point with any road design. A designer should be familiar with the relevant standards, attempt to comply with them and be aware of where any standard cannot be achieved.

However, standards do not guarantee safety as: • standards are developed for a range of reasons, e.g. cost or traffic capacity, as well as safety • standards are often a minimum requirement; combining a series of minimums is undesirable and can leave no room for error, either on the part of the designer, the builder or the final road users • standards usually cover general or common situations, not all situations • the standard may not be applicable to the circumstances in the design • individual road elements, designed to standard, may be quite safe in isolation but may, when combined with other standard elements, be unsafe (i.e. lead a significant number of road users to make errors) • the particular standard may be based on old information

Page 7

• a designer may be using an inappropriate standard or an outdated standard.

Rather than checking for compliance, a road safety audit is checking fitness for purpose: will the road or treatment work safely for its expected road users? Auditors should also fully understand the safe system and be able to integrate this approach, as appropriate, into the audit process.

• Delete Condition 8 The proposed taxi bays are shown on the proposed civil drawings near the bus port. This is reasonable location of the provision of these bays, it is considered that the condition has therefore been satisfied and may be deleted.

• Amend Conditions 9, 20, 24, 25, 26, 29 and 32 to reflect staging of development.

The above conditions are proposed to be modified to enable information to be provided as the development progresses, in accordance with the staging plan to be detailed in the construction management plan. This approach has been agreed on previously and is reflected in a number of other conditions. The City supports the revised wording of these conditions. The applicant’s request is supported. Options/Alternatives: Not applicable Council Recommendation: Not applicable Conclusion: The City generally supports the proposed minor modifications to the approved Redevelopment of the Garden City Shopping Centre. The City does not support the amendment of Condition 3, to remove the need for a Road Safety Audit to be performed on the internal road network. The Road Safety Audit is considered to be consistent with Council Policy and the Austroads Standards and is likely to result in an improved environment for all road users including pedestrians and cyclists.

Page 8

Application for Development Approval

APPLICANT DETAILS

Name: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Address: ……………………………………………………………………………………........................

……………………………………………………………….. Postcode: ……………………………….

Phone: ………………………. Fax: ………………………………………………………………

Mobile: ……………………… Email: …………………………………………………………….

Contact person for correspondence: …………………………………………………………………….

The information and plans provided with this application may be made available by the local government for public viewing in connection with the application. Yes No

Signature: Date:

PROPERTY DETAILS

Lot No: ………………………. House/ Street No: ………….. Location No: ………………………

Diagram or Plan No: ……….. Certificate of Title Vol No: …. Folio: ………………………………

Title encumbrances (e.g. easements, restrictive covenants): ………………………………………….

Street name: ………………………………………………. Suburb: …………………………………..

Nearest street intersection: …………………………………………………………………………………

OWNER DETAILS

Name: ……………………………………………………………………………………….........................

ABN (if applicable): …………………………………………………………………………………………..

Address: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………….. Postcode: ………………………………..

Phone: ………………………. Fax: ………………………………………………………………..

Mobile: ………………………. Email: ……………………………………………………………..

Contact person for correspondence: ……………………………………………………………………..

Signature: ……………………………………………………. Date: ………………………………..

Signature: ……………………………………………………. Date: ………………………………..

The signature of the owner(s) is required on all applications. This application will not proceed without that signature. For the purposes of signing this application an owner includes the persons referred to in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2 Clause 62(2).

Owner: Administration Officer Last Updated: 26/11/2015

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

Nature of development:

Works

Use

Works and use

Is an exemption from development claimed for part of the development? Yes No

If yes, is the exemption for: Works

Use

Description of proposed works and/or land use: …………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Description of exemption claimed (if relevant): …………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Nature of any existing buildings and/or land use: ……………………………………………………….

Approximate cost of the proposed development: ………….....

Estimate time of completion: ……………………………………

OFFICE USE ONLY Acceptance Officer initials: ………………….. Date Received: ………………………………………

Local government reference No: …………… …………………………………………………………

City of Melville Terms and Conditions In submitting an application to City of Melville I accept the following terms and conditions: I declare that the information and plans submitted are correct and can be relied upon for planning assessment purposes. I understand that once an application fee invoice is issued, I have the period between invoice issue and my complete payment to decide if I wish to withdraw my application. Once my complete payment is made I will ano longer be entitled to a refund of any portion of the complete application fees. I acknowledge that the email address that I have provided in lodging this application is the email address to which I will accept any notification or communication from the City of Melville. Any changes so notified to the City of Melville will be via an email and contain all reference numbers used by the City of Melville and by me in relation to this application. I declare I will accept time deadlines for information requested by City of Melville and understand that if I do not adhere to timeframes specified in communications that my applications may be determined with the available information. I declare that by accepting these terms and conditions and submitting my application I have also read the City of Melville website terms and conditions, http://www.melvillecity.com.au/site-information/terms-and-conditions-of-use-of-city-of-melville-online-services/ and I agree to be bound hereby. If the application is being submitted by the owner, then as the representing owner I hereby declare that I am the owner as indicated on the application form.

Owner: Administration Officer Last Updated: 26/11/2015

4688_17feb01Schedule1_ns 1 Created 10/07/17

Schedule 1 Landowner Consent Form

Owner Details

Name: AMP Capital Funds Management Ltd in its capacity as responsible entity of the AMP Capital Diversified Property Fund

Address: Level 24, 33 Alfred Street, Sydney NSW 2000

Phone (Work): 0498140895 Fax:

Email: scott.nugent@ampcapital.com cc: Dylan.bull@ampcapital.com

Property Details

Lot No: 9000 & 17 & 202

Plan/Diagram: 406 & 9417 & 24977 Certificate of Title Volume: 2916 & 1511 & 2765

Folio: 581 & 402 & 299 & 300

Title Encumbrances:

Locality of Development: No. 125 Riseley Street & No. 596 & No. 600 Marmion Street, Booragoon

Signed:

Name: Scott Nugent

Company: AMP Capital Funds Management Ltd

Position: Divisional Development Manager - WA

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 1 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Basement Levels

Adjustment of Loading/Service area levels to separate trucks from customer parking areas.

Updated entrance/exit on Almondbury Road, extending the accessway length between parking the street.

Showing Loading/Service Area on Almondbury on correct level.

Removal of portion of basement parking.

Inclusion of additional access to basement and roof, via speed ramp onto Andrea Lane.

Minor adjustments to parking layouts.

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 2 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Level 00

Amended main street alignment and tenancy's configuration.

Reduction to the southern loading area.

Internal mall reconfiguration & associated adjustments to tenancies.

Minor adjustments to parking layouts.

Updated High Street landscaping

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 3 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Level 00m

Addition of mezzanine parking level.

Minor adjustments to parking layouts.

Level 01

Realignment of major tenancy building to be parallel to the street.

Updated main street tenancy upper floor layouts.

Minor adjustments to parking layouts, and inclusion of speed ramp on the southern side of the site.

Mall reconfiguration & adjustments to tenancies

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 4 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Level 01m

Inclusion of mezzanine parking level on the north side of the site.

Reduction in mezzanine parking level on the southern side of the site.

Level 02

Updated tenancy upper floor and roof layout.

Amended roof area and additional roof parking on the central and southern portions of the site.

Minor adjustments to parking layouts.

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 5 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Minor adjustments to parking layouts.

Tenancy to accommodate cinema use shown, but not part of Application

Eastern roof parking at correct level, avoiding roof glazing.

No readily noticable change

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 6 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Inclusion of speed ramp.

Updates to reflect modifications to facades.

Updated materials and colours.

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 7 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Revised main street buildings.

Updated materials and colours.

Revised main street buildings.

Updated materials and colours.

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 8 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Revised main street buildings.

Updated materials and colours.

Revised main street buildings.

Updated materials and colours.

4688_17apr01T_Amendments_sf.docx 9 Created 12/04/17

Level Approved Plan Modified Plan Description

Revised main street buildings.

Updated materials and colours.

OUR REF: 4688 13/07/2017

MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT EXPANSION (MODIFIED) LOT 200 (NO. 125) RISELEY STREET, LOT 52 (NO. 10) ALMONDBURY ROAD AND LOT 17 (NO. 596) MARMION STREET AND LOT 99 (NO. 173) DAVY STREET BOORAGOON