“designing the proteomics experiment; from protein mixture ... 2-05-08.pdf · “designing the...

21
1 Designing the Proteomics Designing the Proteomics Experiment; From Protein Experiment; From Protein Mixture to Systems Biology and Mixture to Systems Biology and Validation Validation” (An Overview) (An Overview) UAB University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine James Mobley, Ph.D. James Mobley, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Surgery & Pharmacology Assistant Professor, Surgery & Pharmacology Director, UAB Urologic and Clinical Proteomics Facility Director, UAB Urologic and Clinical Proteomics Facility Associate Director, UAB Mass Spectrometry Shared Facility Associate Director, UAB Mass Spectrometry Shared Facility Topics Topics …… ……. A quick overview of A quick overview of Genomics Vs. Proteomics Genomics Vs. Proteomics A General Look at the A General Look at the Field of Proteomics Field of Proteomics ; MS vs. Other ; MS vs. Other approaches. approaches. Overview of Instrumentation, generating Overview of Instrumentation, generating MS for PMF vs. MS for PMF vs. Tandem MS and why Tandem MS and why. Separations when needed, Separations when needed, Top Top- Down overview Vs. Bottom up Down overview Vs. Bottom up and and MuDPIT MuDPIT. MS Data Analysis using MS Data Analysis using Matching Algorithms (a focus!) Matching Algorithms (a focus!). Statistical Assessment Statistical Assessment of the data of the data…..n=? ..n=? Systems Biology Systems Biology.Taking the .Taking the “ So What So What” Factor out of large Factor out of large studies. studies. Validation?? Validation??

Upload: hanhu

Post on 13-Feb-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

““Designing the Proteomics Designing the Proteomics Experiment; From Protein Experiment; From Protein

Mixture to Systems Biology and Mixture to Systems Biology and ValidationValidation””(An Overview)(An Overview)

UABUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamSchool of Medicine

James Mobley, Ph.D.James Mobley, Ph.D.Assistant Professor, Surgery & PharmacologyAssistant Professor, Surgery & PharmacologyDirector, UAB Urologic and Clinical Proteomics FacilityDirector, UAB Urologic and Clinical Proteomics FacilityAssociate Director, UAB Mass Spectrometry Shared FacilityAssociate Director, UAB Mass Spectrometry Shared Facility

TopicsTopics…………..

►► A quick overview of A quick overview of Genomics Vs. ProteomicsGenomics Vs. Proteomics►► A General Look at the A General Look at the Field of ProteomicsField of Proteomics; MS vs. Other ; MS vs. Other

approaches.approaches.►► Overview of Instrumentation, generating Overview of Instrumentation, generating MS for PMF vs. MS for PMF vs.

Tandem MS and whyTandem MS and why..►► Separations when needed, Separations when needed, TopTop--Down overview Vs. Bottom up Down overview Vs. Bottom up

and and MuDPITMuDPIT..►► MS Data Analysis using MS Data Analysis using Matching Algorithms (a focus!)Matching Algorithms (a focus!)..►► Statistical AssessmentStatistical Assessment of the dataof the data……..n=?..n=?►► Systems BiologySystems Biology…….Taking the .Taking the ““So WhatSo What”” Factor out of large Factor out of large

studies.studies.►► Validation??Validation??

2

Genomics Vs. Proteomics?Genomics Vs. Proteomics?

►► Genomic studies will always remain important!Genomic studies will always remain important!

►► However, weHowever, we’’re finding that re finding that gene gene transcriptiontranscription does does not necessarily equate to gene not necessarily equate to gene translationtranslation..

►► Therefore, many genes are transcribed that Therefore, many genes are transcribed that do not do not lead to translationlead to translation, or to , or to functional proteinsfunctional proteins!!

►► Finally, Finally, postpost--translational modification (PTM)translational modification (PTM) events events will will dictate the 1) dictate the 1) cellular locationcellular location, 2) , 2) biological biological processprocess, or 3) , or 3) molecular functionmolecular function. .

What Tools Encompass What Tools Encompass Proteomics?Proteomics?

►►Relative or Absolute Quantification of Known Relative or Absolute Quantification of Known ProteinsProteins…………..

Mass Spectrometry ( Heavy Labeled Mass Spectrometry ( Heavy Labeled StdsStds, i.e. , i.e. AQUA)AQUA)ImmunoImmuno--Directed (examples)Directed (examples)►►1) Protein Arrays, 2) Western Blot, 3) ELISA, 4) 1) Protein Arrays, 2) Western Blot, 3) ELISA, 4)

BioplexBioplex/ / LuminexLuminex

►►Characterization of Unknown Proteins/ Characterization of Unknown Proteins/ Mapping Post Translational Modifications Mapping Post Translational Modifications ((PTMPTM’’ss))…………....

Sequencing of UnknownsSequencing of Unknowns, Mass Spectrometry , Mass Spectrometry alone! alone!

3

Soft Ionization TechniquesSoft Ionization Techniques(Question;(Question;

why are these two approaches special for proteomics?)why are these two approaches special for proteomics?)

MALDI-(singly charged ions)

ESI-(multiple charge states)

Baldwin M.A., Mass spectrometers for the analysis of biomolecules, Methods in Enzymology, Vol 402

Molecular CharacterizationMolecular Characterization►► SoSo…….There are .There are just three simple pointsjust three simple points to remember to remember

in the business of molecular characterization.in the business of molecular characterization.1) 1) Generation of a parent & daughter ion mass spectra.Generation of a parent & daughter ion mass spectra.►► [[MSMS11 onlyonly]; for digested proteins the peptide mass fingerprinting ]; for digested proteins the peptide mass fingerprinting

[PMF] (protein must be nearly pure)[PMF] (protein must be nearly pure)►► [MS[MS22]; sequence data (high purity is not necessarily required)]; sequence data (high purity is not necessarily required)

2) 2) Analysis.Analysis.►►Matching algorithmsMatching algorithms based on based on inin--silicosilico digestion and predicted size digestion and predicted size

of peptides from proteins for example (MSof peptides from proteins for example (MS11) & fragmentation ) & fragmentation (MS(MS22). ).

►►DenovoDenovo Sequencing (MSSequencing (MS22), based on the known size of fragments, ), based on the known size of fragments, for example daughter ions from amino acids.for example daughter ions from amino acids.

3) 3) Validation.Validation.►► ImmunoImmuno--affinityaffinity techniques (Western analysis, techniques (Western analysis, ImmunoImmuno--

histochemistryhistochemistry, ELISA, , ELISA, LuminexLuminex, etc)., etc).►►Mass SpectrometryMass Spectrometry (standard heavy isotope tags)(standard heavy isotope tags)

4

Proteins to PeptidesProteins to Peptides……..►► Even today, we are Even today, we are highly limitedhighly limited by decreased detection, by decreased detection,

resolving power, and poor fragmentation of resolving power, and poor fragmentation of ““wholewhole””proteins!proteins!

►► Therefore, we Therefore, we ““digestdigest”” proteins to peptidesproteins to peptides prior to MS prior to MS analysis.analysis.

►► Many chemical and enzymatic techniques have been Many chemical and enzymatic techniques have been published; however,published; however, trypsintrypsin remains the most commonly remains the most commonly utilized enzyme for use in proteomics!utilized enzyme for use in proteomics!

►► This enzyme This enzyme cleaves at cleaves at argininearginine and lysine,and lysine, yielding yielding peptides that are easily detected and fragmented in the most peptides that are easily detected and fragmented in the most common mass analyzers today.common mass analyzers today.

►► Keeping in mind that utilizing Keeping in mind that utilizing multiple digestionmultiple digestion procedures procedures carried out on the same sample can be carried out on the same sample can be very complementing!very complementing!

http://donatello.ucsf.edu/http://donatello.ucsf.edu/A lot of information hereA lot of information here…………Take a look at Protein ProspectorTake a look at Protein Prospector…………..

Sensitivity is Inversely Proportional to MassSensitivity is Inversely Proportional to Mass(MALDI(MALDI--ToFToF Example)Example)

0 10 20 30 40 50

Molecular Weight (kDa)

100.0

25.0

6.3

1.6

0.4

0.1

Rel

ativ

e Pe

ak A

rea

(100

% =

1.6

fmol

e)

1.6 femptomole3.9 pg/ μL

c

Rel

ativ

e Pe

ak A

rea

(100

% se

t equ

al to

1.6

fmol

e) 1.6 fmole

0 10 20 30 40 50

Molecular Weight (kDa)

100.0

25.0

6.3

1.6

0.4

0.1

Rel

ativ

e Pe

ak A

rea

(100

% =

1.6

fmol

e)

1.6 femptomole3.9 pg/ μL

c

Rel

ativ

e Pe

ak A

rea

(100

% se

t equ

al to

1.6

fmol

e) 1.6 fmole

Student Lab Example!Student Lab Example!

SoSo…….digestion is often necessary, .digestion is often necessary, but but doesdoes increase complexity!increase complexity!Common Enzymes:Trypsin* K-X, R-XChymotrypsin* X-L, -F, -Y, -WLys-C* K-XArg-C* R-XAsp-N X-DGlu-C* E-XCommon Chemicals:Cyanogen BromideX-MHCL X-X

* a tailing proline inhibits digestion

5

Concept of PMF [MSConcept of PMF [MS11]]

►► MSMS11 approachesapproaches –– spectra containing peptide parent spectra containing peptide parent molecules only!molecules only!

►► This type of unambiguous protein ID is referred to as This type of unambiguous protein ID is referred to as ““peptide mass fingerprintingpeptide mass fingerprinting”” (PMF) introduced ~1990.(PMF) introduced ~1990.

►► In this case, In this case, no sequence information is generatedno sequence information is generated, but it is , but it is very sensitive when very little sample is available!very sensitive when very little sample is available!

►► The downfall is that the sample The downfall is that the sample must be very pure!must be very pure! Highly Highly complementing for 2D PAGE work.complementing for 2D PAGE work.

►► However, However, high mass accuracyhigh mass accuracy is a must as well!is a must as well!►► Overall, these daysOverall, these days………………unless absolutely unless absolutely

necessarynecessary……………………. . PMF should not be used!PMF should not be used!►► There are simply There are simply too many matches possibletoo many matches possible with this with this

technique even with access to high resolution instruments.technique even with access to high resolution instruments.

Question; WhatQuestion; What’’s the downfall of this approach, upswing?s the downfall of this approach, upswing?

Protein Fragmentation [MSProtein Fragmentation [MS22]]

►► Both ESI and MALDI based Both ESI and MALDI based tandem instrumentstandem instrumentsare common in most core settings, each with a are common in most core settings, each with a combination of mass analyzers.combination of mass analyzers.

►► Each source and combination of Each source and combination of mass analyzersmass analyzershave their selective advantages worthy of a second have their selective advantages worthy of a second talk!talk!

►► Fragmentation is generally similar,Fragmentation is generally similar, primarily with primarily with the generation of eitherthe generation of either………………..

b and y ions;b and y ions; collision induced decay (CID) & infrared collision induced decay (CID) & infrared multiphotonmultiphoton dissociation (IRMPD)dissociation (IRMPD)z and c ions;z and c ions; electron transfer dissociation (ETD) & electron transfer dissociation (ETD) & electron capture dissociation (ECD)electron capture dissociation (ECD)

6

Many Instruments for Many Many Instruments for Many Applications!Applications!

Quad, Quad, ToFToF, Ion Trap, and, Ion Trap, and……or FT?or FT?

DomonDomon & & AebersoldAebersold, Science, V312, 14 April, 2006, Science, V312, 14 April, 2006

Principals of the Principals of the MALDIMALDI--ToF/ToFToF/ToF 47004700

(for peptide sequencing)(for peptide sequencing)

7

800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200Mass

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000C

lust

er A

rea

800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200Mass

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000C

lust

er A

rea

2383.96

2281.08

2254.06

2224.09

2194.332125.88

2088.00

2056.08

2052.921994.02

1953.00

1883.89

1872.871838.89

1831.931794.78

1791.77

1765.73

1716.85

1707.77

1664.78

1641.77

1630.83

1584.67

1529.74

1493.711487.74

1472.781451.74

1410.731383.68

1365.64

1336.64

1320.60

1310.68

1274.711265.58

1233.60

1232.60

1198.63

1182.59

1172.56

1136.56

1118.58

1104.57

1086.55

1019.53

999.47987.51

959.53

947.52917.28

900.09

882.89

870.26

832.31

817.49

789.04

759.42746.09

696.09

679.52

669.00

MS/MS (1182 ion)MS/MS (1182 ion)

In Gel Digest (MS)In Gel Digest (MS)

MALDIMALDI--MS(MS)MS(MS)22

ESIESI--Linear Ion TrapLinear Ion Trap

FTFT--ICR or ICR or OrbitrapOrbitrap

8

0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0T i m e ( m i n )

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

03 2 . 9 0

1 9 . 3 0

2 0 . 4 1

2 1 . 0 6

2 3 . 0 4

2 3 . 6 12 . 6 1 3 0 . 6 22 . 8 5 4 2 . 6 93 3 . 6 81 8 . 3 46 . 8 0 4 3 . 3 1 5 1 . 4 8

Single Spectrum (MS2)@799.76 precursor peak

LCMS(BasePeak)65 minute RF Elution Profile

23.74 minutes

j m _ 0 4 1 1 2 0 d _ p y m t 3 4 # 1 4 1 9 R T : 2 3 . 7 4 A V : 1 N L : 1 . 3 3 E 8T : + c N S I F u l l m s [ 4 0 0 . 0 0 - 1 8 0 0 . 0 0 ]

4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 8 0 0m / z

0

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

1 0 0

Rel

ativ

e A

bund

ance

8 4 6 . 9 7

7 9 9 . 7 6

7 0 2 . 9 95 5 1 . 6 8 1 0 0 7 . 0 08 9 8 . 0 7

6 8 5 . 4 75 0 4 . 2 2 1 1 0 6 . 8 0 1 7 2 2 . 5 71 3 1 6 . 9 91 5 6 5 . 6 01 2 4 0 . 2 1 1 3 9 3 . 2 8 1 6 7 8 . 6 2

1 7 9 2 . 3 1

799.76 m/z

Sequence:(K)YMCENQATISSK

LCLC--ESIESI--MS(MS)MS(MS)22

Single Spectrum (MS)@23.74 minutes R.T.

Question.Question.

In-General, Why is one Instrument better than the other, for what experiments??What would you do for a……..?

In-Gel 1D experiment (complex mix)In-Gel 1D experiment (after an IP experiment)In-Gel 2D experiment (complex mix)In-Solution Digestion of any kind other than a pure

protein.In-Solution, whole Proteins Vs. Large Native PeptidesQuantitative Proteomics Experiments (many to choose from)?

What about Price for each, is that important?

9

Pure ProteinPure Protein

MultidimensionalMultidimensionalSeparationsSeparations

Affinity, 2D, HPLCAffinity, 2D, HPLC

MultidimensionalMultidimensionalSeparationsSeparations

Affinity, CaPAffinity, CaP--LCLC

MS/MS AnalysisMS/MS Analysis

Computational TimeComputational TimeExtensiveExtensive

MS AnalysisMS AnalysisComputational TimeComputational Time

MinimumMinimumProtein IDProtein ID

Complex ProteinComplex ProteinMixtureMixture

Chemical or Enzymatic Chemical or Enzymatic DigestionDigestion

(true Top(true Top--Down; in Down; in source isolation and source isolation and

fragmentation)fragmentation)

Chemical or Chemical or Enzymatic Digestion Enzymatic Digestion

TopTop--DownDown

BottomBottom--UPUP

Top Down Vs. Bottom Up ProteomicsTop Down Vs. Bottom Up Proteomics

MuMultiltiddimensional imensional PProtein rotein IIdentification dentification TTechnologies (echnologies (MuDPITMuDPIT))

MudPIT developed in John Yate’s Lab, Scripps Research Institute

SCX Column C18 ColumnTryptic Digestion

[+/-] Treated Cells – Secreted or Cellular Proteins (Combined and Pre-fractionated)

LCMS(MS)2

Stepwise Elution F1F2

F3F4

F5

Automated Spectral Analysis

Peptide Pairs Relative

Quantification and

Identification

Gradient Elution(LC/MS)

10

Quantitative ProteomicsQuantitative ProteomicsUsing a Bottom UP or Shotgun Approach!Using a Bottom UP or Shotgun Approach!

►►Stable Isotope Tags:Stable Isotope Tags:ICATICAT (isotope coded affinity tag)(isotope coded affinity tag)SILACSILAC (stable isotope labeled AA in cell culture)(stable isotope labeled AA in cell culture)iTRAQiTRAQ (Isotope tags for relative and absolute and (Isotope tags for relative and absolute and quantification)quantification)1818O DigestsO Digests (labels (labels trypsintrypsin digested peptides at digested peptides at lysine and lysine and argininearginine))Many Other Chemical TagsMany Other Chemical Tags

(a)KO Cells13C/14C Labeled Amino Acid2

(b) Control Cells12C Non-Labeled Amino Acid

Combine Equal Volume of Media/ Equal Number of Cells

Concentrate Media Proteins/ Fraction Cell Compartments3

Pre-fractionate Proteins3

MuDPIT

Quantification by MS

SStable table IIsotope sotope LLabeling with abeling with AAmino Acidsmino Acids(SILAC)(SILAC)11

Leu-13C6 Leu-12C6

11

Protein Quantitation and Identification Using Protein Quantitation and Identification Using LCLC--MS/MSMS/MS

Observed ratio 1:1 Observed ratio 1:9

A B

C D

Ibarrola et al, Anal. Chem. 2003

M/Z

Ion

Curr

ent

MSQuantification

1 2 3

4

Protein Mixture A(Non-treated Cells)

Protein Mixture B(Treated Cells)

MS/MSCharacterization

M/Z

Ion

Curr

ent

(1)

(2)

(3)

ICAT ApproachICAT Approach

12

Example of Spectra Taken From an ICAT RunExample of Spectra Taken From an ICAT Run>200 Proteins Identified in a Single Fraction

SFGTC*DER

iTRAQiTRAQ(can label up to 8 samples in a single run!)(can label up to 8 samples in a single run!)

13

Reporter Tags for Reporter Tags for iTRAQiTRAQ

Any Other Examples?Any Other Examples?

►►QuestionQuestion…………..What are we missing?..What are we missing?►►NonNon--Tagged ProteomicsTagged Proteomics (Top(Top--Down) or Down) or

PeptidomicsPeptidomics (shotgun, Bottom(shotgun, Bottom--up)up)►►This can be carried out in a This can be carried out in a Mass Spectrometer Mass Spectrometer

or via 2D PAGE for example.or via 2D PAGE for example.

14

Data AnalysisData Analysis

►►A standard 1D LCA standard 1D LC--ESI run may have as ESI run may have as many as many as 4,0004,000--6,000 MS files!!6,000 MS files!!

►►A A MuDPITMuDPIT run may contain run may contain 25,00025,000--60,000 60,000 files!!files!!

►►While LCWhile LC--MALDI runs generate far fewer MALDI runs generate far fewer data files, they still contain data files, they still contain tootoo--much data to much data to analyze by hand!analyze by hand!

►►Therefore, Therefore, automated data analysis is automated data analysis is required!!required!!

Data AnalysisData Analysis►►Common Matching Algorithms; Common Matching Algorithms;

SequestSequest, MASCOT, , MASCOT, XTandemXTandem

►►Automated Automated DenovoDenovo Sequence Tools;Sequence Tools;Peaks, Rapid Peaks, Rapid DenovoDenovo, , DenovoXDenovoX, Mascot Distiller, , Mascot Distiller, PepNovoPepNovo, others, others……....

►►Statistical SoftwareStatistical SoftwareScaffold, Protein Profit, Scaffold, Protein Profit, FinniganFinnigan, others, others……

►►Standardizing the Field!Standardizing the Field!Trans Proteomic Pipeline (Sashimi Project; Trans Proteomic Pipeline (Sashimi Project; mzXMLmzXML based universal software package)based universal software package)

15

Matching AlgorithmsMatching Algorithms

►►All matching algorithms All matching algorithms (i.e. SEQUEST, (i.e. SEQUEST, MASCOT, X!TANDEM)MASCOT, X!TANDEM) are based on are based on generating a score based on generating a score based on ““closeness of fitcloseness of fit””between the between the peptide fragments measuredpeptide fragments measured in in the mass spectrometer and thethe mass spectrometer and the inin--silicosilicodigestion/ fragmentation of known genesdigestion/ fragmentation of known genes or or proteins in a database.proteins in a database.

The two most commonly used databases include: The two most commonly used databases include: NCBINCBI--NR and NR and UniprotUniprot

Getting at the Good Stuff; Overview of Getting at the Good Stuff; Overview of Scaffold and SuchScaffold and Such……....

►►Protein ProfitProtein Profit……..or Scaffold?..or Scaffold?►►Great Overview atGreat Overview at…………....►►http://www.proteomesoftware.com/http://www.proteomesoftware.com/►►http://www.proteomesoftware.com/Proteome_http://www.proteomesoftware.com/Proteome_

software_pro_interpreting.htmlsoftware_pro_interpreting.html

16

Overview of Stats ApproachesOverview of Stats Approaches(n=?)(n=?)

►► MS Based Analysis can Include;MS Based Analysis can Include;Quantitative TagsQuantitative TagsAQUA (AQUA (knownsknowns))NonNon--Tagged (MS or 2D PAGE)Tagged (MS or 2D PAGE)

►► Either way, Filter MS Data with Either way, Filter MS Data with High Confidence High Confidence Cut offCut off’’s.s.

►► Combine the common hits from each arm of the Combine the common hits from each arm of the experiment experiment (i.e. how common is of interest, what do (i.e. how common is of interest, what do we do with the zerowe do with the zero’’s?)s?)..

►► Carry out basic statistics for each hit, Carry out basic statistics for each hit, i.e. noni.e. non--parametric tests to filter out less significant hits.parametric tests to filter out less significant hits.

Multivariate and Classification Multivariate and Classification TechniquesTechniques

►►Visual Assessment of differentially expressed Visual Assessment of differentially expressed proteinsproteins, post filtered as discussed with , post filtered as discussed with application of application of Clustering Approaches.Clustering Approaches.

Principal Component or Multidimensional ScalingPrincipal Component or Multidimensional ScalingHierarchical Clustering AnalysisHierarchical Clustering Analysis

►►Classification of larger data setsClassification of larger data sets can be carried can be carried out using KNN/ Boot Strapping/ LOOCVout using KNN/ Boot Strapping/ LOOCV…………

17

Example (HCA)Example (HCA)

Healthy vs. Cancer (w/o outliers)Final Configuration

Example (MDS)Example (MDS)

18

Overview of Systems Biology Overview of Systems Biology ApproachesApproaches

►►The The ““So WhatSo What”” FactorFactor…………..how do we side ..how do we side step this after a large experiment?step this after a large experiment?

►►Great Overview atGreat Overview at…………....►►http://www.cytoscape.org/http://www.cytoscape.org/►►http://cytoscape.org/cgihttp://cytoscape.org/cgi--

bin/moin.cgi/Presentationsbin/moin.cgi/Presentations

Example:Protein bands were excised from the 1D gel for Ras and Ras:p53-63, digested with trypsin and run with LTQ-XL/CID mode. The results from LTQ-XL were run through SEQUEST to identify proteins. The proteins unique to Ras;p53-63 was run through *Cytoscape to see how those proteins relate to one another based on their molecular functions.

Ras Ras;p53

532520150

**CytoscapeCytoscape is an open source bioinformatics software platform for is an open source bioinformatics software platform for visualizingvisualizingmolecular interaction networks and molecular interaction networks and integratingintegrating these interactions with gene these interactions with gene expression profiles and other state data. expression profiles and other state data.

Red-ox

Binding

Protein modification

Transferase

Ligase

Transporter

Receptor

19

Total Unique Proteins = 277Brain (B) 119Liver (Li) 75Lung (Lu) 122Kidney (K) 131Common (>2) 57*Common (all 4) 33

Brain119

Liver75

Kidney131

Lung122

57

Example of Common Proteins*Acyl-CoA-binding proteinAldose reductase*Alpha-enolase*Apolipoprotein D precursor*ATP synthase-coupling factorBisphosphoglycerate mutase*Copper transport protein ATOX1*Cytochrome c oxidase*D-dopachrome decarboxylaseDynein light chain roadblock-type 1*Glutathione S-transferase P 1Isopentenyl-diphosphate isomerase 1L-xylulose reductase*Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A*Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 Polyadenylate-binding protein 1Protein S100-A6*Ptms protein*Selenium-binding protein 1*Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]Thioredoxin*Thymosin beta-4 *TSC22 domain family protein 1*Albumin*Apolipoprotein A-IICalmodulin 1*Caronic anydrases (2)*Hb-alpha*Hb-beta*Keratin Subtypes (10)*MIFMitochondrial Membrane Tim8 AMitochondrial Membrane Tim8 B*Niemann Pick type C2*Prosaposins (3)Ubiquitin C, full insert sequence*Unknowns or Not Annotated (8)

mitochondrion extracellular cytoplasm membrane nucleus organelle, other cytoskeleton

ValidationValidation……....

►►Relative or Absolute Quantification of Known Relative or Absolute Quantification of Known ProteinsProteins…………..

Mass Spectrometry (Mass Tags/ AQUA)Mass Spectrometry (Mass Tags/ AQUA)ImmunoImmuno--Directed (examples)Directed (examples)►►1) Protein Arrays1) Protein Arrays►►2) Western Blot2) Western Blot►►3) ELISA3) ELISA►►4) 4) BioplexBioplex/ / LuminexLuminex

20

Ex: HTP Validation of Novel Markers Ex: HTP Validation of Novel Markers with Multiplex Bead Assays (with Multiplex Bead Assays (LuminexLuminex))

Multiplex Bead Assay for cytokinesThe highlighted area represent populations of fluorescent beads, distinctively labeled, and carrying capture antibodies for sandwich assay of different cytokines. All detection antibodies carry the same fluorophore, which is read in a third channel to quantify sample cytokine concentration

Bosch I. et. al. work in progress!

SummarySummary

►► Whether or not you do the MS work yourselfWhether or not you do the MS work yourself………….. .. Know the specificsKnow the specifics…………!!Know the limitationsKnow the limitations……..!..!

►► Sample Prep is always importantSample Prep is always important……..but ..but which instrument which instrument you have access to is also important!you have access to is also important!

►► Similarly importantSimilarly important…….how is your data analyzed?? .how is your data analyzed?? DenovoDenovo??Matching Algorithm??Matching Algorithm??Mix of techniques??Mix of techniques??What are the cut off points and does it make sense?What are the cut off points and does it make sense?

►► Keep in mind that Keep in mind that validationvalidation must be part of your must be part of your workflow!!workflow!!

►► So, make sure you have So, make sure you have confidenceconfidence in your choices before in your choices before going forward!going forward!

21

Useful Links!Useful Links!

►► ii--mass.commass.com ionsource.comionsource.com►► spectroscopynow.comspectroscopynow.com bruker.combruker.com►► expasy.chexpasy.ch/tools/tools thermo.comthermo.com►► cprmap.comcprmap.com appliedbiosystems.comappliedbiosystems.com►► psidev.sourceforge.netpsidev.sourceforge.net shimadzu.comshimadzu.com►► prospector.ucsf.eduprospector.ucsf.edu luminexcorp.comluminexcorp.com►► jeolusa.com/ms/docs/ionize.htmljeolusa.com/ms/docs/ionize.html►► asms.orgasms.org (become a member!)(become a member!)►► hupo.orghupo.org►► matrixscience.commatrixscience.com►► proteomecenter.org/software.phpproteomecenter.org/software.php

Questions??