designing scalable assistive technologies and services for independent healthy living and...
TRANSCRIPT
Technology Strategy Board
Assisted Living Innovation Platform (ALIP 3&4)
Economic & Business Models and Social & Behavioural Studies
‘SALT’
Designing Scalable Assistive Technologies and Services for Independent Healthy Living and Sustainable Market
Development in the Mixed Digital Economy
Key Findings
Project Leader & Principal Investigator
Professor Feng Li
Cass Business School, London
Date: August 2014 Ref: 2377-25137
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 2
Contributing Researchers Institution
Professor Feng Li (PI) Cass Business School, City University London
Dr Ali Ziaee Bigdeli Cass Business School, City University London
Dr Festus Oderanti Business School Plymouth University
Dr Xiaohui Shi Cass Business School, City University London
Dr Rob Wilson Business School, Newcastle University
Professor Mike Martin Business School, Newcastle University
Prof John Wildman Business School, Newcastle University
Dr Peter McMeekin Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University
Dr Katie Brittain Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University
Dr Gary Pritchard Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University
Dr Tracy Finch Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University
Professor Louise Robinson Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University
Professor Peter Wright School of Computing Science, Newcastle University
Professor Patrick Olivier School of Computing Science, Newcastle University
Dr John Vines School of Computing Science, Newcastle University
Graham Armitage Institute of Ageing & Health, Newcastle University
Dr Lynne Corner Institute of Ageing & Health, Newcastle University
The Funders This Project is funded by the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), with contributions
from the NHS National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the UK Economic and
Social Research Council (ESRC) and our business partners, under the Assisted Living
Innovation Platform Programme (ALIP3 & 4): Economic & Business Models and
Social & Behavioural Studies.
Project Manager
Mr Daniel Martin – Newcastle University
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 3
Contributing Partners Representatives
Fran O’Brien
Christopher Curry, David Rimmer
Daniel Heery, Kevin Wood
Stephen Hope, Sylvain Laxade
Greg Moorhouse, Glenn Carroll, Ryan Smith
Rutger Zietsma
Carl Brown, Alan Sanderson, Catherine Smith
Prof Peter Gore, Prof Garth Johnson
David Silver
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 4
Steering Committee Institution
Pamela Denham (Chair) Chair of Project North East, Board Member of
Newcastle Primary Care Trust, Age Concern,
Years Ahead and the Institute for Ageing and
Health
Professor Tom Kirkwood Newcastle University
Professor Paul Watson Director of Digital Economy Hub, and Director of
Digital Institute, Newcastle University
Professor John Bond Prof of Social Gerontology and Health Services
Research, Institute of Health and Society
Professor Gail Mountain Professor of Assistive Technology, Sheffield
University
Professor Cam Donaldson Director of Yunus Centre for Social Business and
Health, Glasgow Caledonian University
Professor Carl May Professor of Healthcare Innovation, University of
Southampton
Gary Mouton Product Manager (Ageing Products), Accessibility
Business Unit, Microsoft Corporation
Phil Isherwood Chairman of the British Healthcare Trades
Association and Chief Executive of Nottingham
Rehab Supplies
Penny Hill The NHS Information Centre, Member of the
National Information Governance Board
Tommy Lovell Public Governor of Northumbria Healthcare NHS
Foundation Trust, Managing Director of Kablefree
Ltd
John Eaglesham Chief Executive, Advanced Digital Institute. West
Yorkshire
Gerald Wistow Government Advisor on social care policy; Visiting
Professor of Social Care, Durham University
Jim Greer Project Manager. North East improvement and
Efficiency Partnership (NEIEP)
Claire Horton Project Manager, Adult & Culture Services
Directorate, Newcastle City Council
Graeme Woodcock Director, Motorola Healthcare, UK
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 5
Background of the SALT Project
This research investigates Sustainable business models for Assisted Living
Technologies and services (SALT) in the ageing society, in the context of the digital
economy. The current health and social care systems in the UK are not sustainable
duo to rapidly growing demand from the ageing population. There is insufficient
capacity and resources to simply maintain the current level of service provision, let
alone improving them. Indeed, in the current economic climate of austerity and
spending cut, the resource base is shrinking while demands continue to increase
rapidly. The radical changes to the NHS in England outlined in the government
whitepaper may further exacerbate the problem. Meanwhile, the heavy burden on
individual informal carers is likely to grow much further very rapidly. All these are
taking place against a background of growing demands for improving the mental and
emotional wellbeing of older people and enabling their independent healthy living in
communities.
Rapid developments of Assisted Living Technologies and Services (ALTS) offer
significant opportunities for addressing the challenges in the ageing society, both by
reforming existing provisions and by facilitating new market developments. These
technologies and services have mostly been designed and developed as a way of
supporting older people to remain independent for longer and to 'age in place'. The
uptake and use of ALTS, however, is complex and under-utilised, moreover the role
that informal carers have in using and implementing ALTS for their spouses or older
members of their family is often not acknowledged. The vision of the UK government
is to liberate the NHS by putting power into the hands of patients and clinicians,
removing layers of management. One way in which this may be achieved is by
general practice forming GP consortia. It is hoped that this shift in power will bring
decision-making closer to patients.
Traditionally, technological systems have often been developed almost entirely from a
commercial perspective, and therefore are often detached from a deep understanding
or consideration of the environment or users of the technology. Concerns over high
rates of abandonment of assistive devices have led to attempts to match individuals
more closely to the assistive devices that are being developed. Integrating
technologies into everyday life is complex and often involves hidden problems for
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 6
users, in modifying the design and way in which these technologies are used. There
are a range of important human, social and organisational factors that either promote
or inhibit the successful adoption or use of technologies in people’s lives.
Understanding and highlighting these factors is vital in design processes for ALTS,
and it opens up new avenues for sustainable market development. It calls for the
development of sustainable and scalable new business models to align social
objectives of caring for the old with robust business principles to ensure these
products and services are affordable and usable.
SALT project has therefore adopted an integrated, multi-perspective approach to
address this significant societal challenge in the ageing society by focusing on three
key elements.
More radical reform in current health and social service provision is urgently
needed, by developing innovative solutions that are viable, scalable and
sustainable to improve their efficiency and effectiveness. The enormous
complexity and practical difficulties involved necessitates a co-construction
approach by creating the context in which different stakeholders can explore,
discuss and make sense of the complex relationships and conflicting demands,
and negotiate and co-develop consensus and plausible and workable solutions.
This will facilitate significant reforms within the current health and social care
provision to improve efficiency and effectiveness and reduce costs. Such an
approach can also be extended to address senstitive issues of private-public mix
where public services work with private busineses in health and social care
services. In particular, it enables the effective exploration of community
initiatives and ethical businesses which are likely to play a key role in future
healh and social care.
The growing demand for health and social care from the rapidly ageing
population also calls for new market development for assisted living products and
services in a mixed digital economy. Market development for ALTS has been
both slow and fragmented. In fact, even for many pilot projects that have been
deemed successful often fail to scale up or become financially sustainable once
the initial funding has run out. Important lessons can be learnt from other sectors
that have successfully deployed new business models to promote sustainable new
market development. This project has identified new business models to support
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 7
sustainable and scalable new market development in assisted living products and
services. This will generate new resources and new capacity to support
independent healthy living by older people in communities, and improve the
wellbeing and welfare of older people and their relatives and carers.
To develop scalable business solutions for personalised services, we need to
understand the preferences and uses of ALTS by both current and future users,
and the contexts in which they are used and integrated into people's lives and
everyday routines. This will ensure inform the design processes for ALTS. In
particular, questions need to be answered concerning how ‘need’ is
conceptualised in the provision of ALTS and how this impacts on the
acceptability and use of ALTS in the home context, as well as the role of ‘choice’
in developing economic and business solutions that connect with the perspectives
of users.
Aims and Objectives
The overarching objectives of the SALT project are twofolds:
(1) Design scalable assistive technologies and services and new business models to
promote sustainable market development for independent healthy living in a mixed
digital economy;
(2) Understand and examine the factors that promote or inhibit the uptake, use and
integration of assistive technologies for older people living in the community from a
user-centred perspective.
This prjects addresses both themes of the ALIP 3&4 programmes by bringing
together a multi-disciplinary team of senior academics with practitioners from
business, health and social care services, government agencies, third sector
organisations and user groups to develop innovative, workable solutions. It leveraged
the extensive resources, expertise and relationships of the RCUK funded £12.6
million Digital Economy Hub on Social Inclusion through the Digital Economy
(SiDE), previous research projects in the Institute of Health and Society (IHS) on
Telecare and on Patient-Centred Care, and the extensive business engagement
programmes at Institute of Aeging and Health (IAH), Cass Business School and
Newcastle University Business School. The close involvement of businesses, health
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 8
and social care organisations and users helped identify routes to market. It also makes
a significant contribution to capacity building in the UK, by developing and testing
innovative solutions within existing health and social care structures through co-
production; exploring new business models for sustainable new market development
through case studies and experiments; and informing and validating new workable
solutions from a user-centred perspective.
The SALT Approach
SALT has adopted a multiple-perspective approach through seven closely intertwined
Work Packages (WPs) to address key issues in economic and business models (WP1-
3) and social and behaviourial studies (WP4-5) in the mixed digital economy, with
two further packages (WP6-7) for synthesis and dissemination:
WP1: New Business Models and New Market Development (Led by Prof Feng Li)
Identify emerging business models for sustainable and scalable market development
in different sectors and domains through case studies and global best practice, and
explore their adaptation and implementation in assisted living technologies and
services for sustainable new market development.
WP2: Co-Construction of Shared Visions and Solutions (Led by Dr Rob Wilson and
Prof Mike Martin)
Providing contexts for different stakeholders to explore, discuss and make sense of
the complex relationships and conflicting demands and negotiate and co-develop
plausible solutions; co-production of product and service brokerage environment for
scalable services through federation.
WP3: Economic modelling (Led by Prof John Wildman)
Drawing on input from all other WPs to define plausible scenarios and then using
economic modelling to simulate and explore the costs and benefits involved and the
scale of the opportunities and challenges under different scenarios.
WP4: User Uptake (Led by Dr Katie Brittain; Dr Tracy Finch; Prof Louise
Robinson)
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 9
Using interview, observation and focus groups to understand factors that promote or
inhibit the uptake, use and integration of ALTS for current and future generations of
older people living in the community and to develop solutions to promote the
effective integration of these technologies into users everyday lives.
WP5 User-centred design (Led by Prof Peter Wright, Prof Patrick Olivier)
Using a range of cutting edge experience-centred design techniques to design
experience prototypes of a range of innovative ALTS services, and by so doing, to
evaluate which user engagement methods are most suited for ALTS service design.
WP6: Synthesis and Theory Development (Led by Prof Feng Li)
Triangulating the data, results and learning from all strands of research through a
series of facilitated review workshops amongst the project team, together with an
invited audience where appropriate, to develop consensus and identify conditions and
circumstances under which the results can be effectively applied.
WP7: Dissemination and Public Engagement (Led by Graham Armitage, Dr Lynne
Corner)
Ensuring that the project is shaped by the needs of a broad range of stakeholders and
that project outputs are useful and widely disseminated to businesses, practitioners
and the public in the assisted living market.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 10
Table of Contents
Chapter One New Business Models & New Market Development ..................... 11
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 12
1.2 Key Findings ................................................................................................. 12
1.3 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 17
Chapter Two Co-Construction of Shared Visions and Solutions .......................... 21
2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 22
2.2 Key Findings ................................................................................................. 22
2.3 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 24
Chapter Three Economic Modelling .................................................................... 26
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 27
3.2 Key Findings ................................................................................................. 28
3.3 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 29
Chapter Four User Uptake ................................................................................ 31
4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 32
4.2 Key Findings ................................................................................................. 33
4.3 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 35
Chapter Five User-Centred Design.................................................................... 39
5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 40
5.2 Key Findings ................................................................................................. 42
5.3 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 45
Chapter Six Synthesis, Dissemination and Engagement .................................. 47
6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 48
6.2 Key Findings ................................................................................................. 48
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 11
Chapter One
New Business Models & New Market Development
Work Package Leader:
Professor Feng Li, Cass Business School
Contributing Researchers:
Dr Ali Z. Bigdeli
Dr Festus Oderanti
Dr Xiaohui Shi
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 12
1.1 Introduction
Despite heavy investment in health and social care in recent years, large scale
deployment of Assisted Living Technologies and Services (ALTS) remains rare, and
the lack of sustainable business models is often regarded as one of the greatest
barriers. The main aim of this work package is to investigate new business models for
sustainable and scalable market development of ALTS through empirical research.
The key objectives of this this work package are:
To develop a systematic mapping of new business models for mainstreaming new
digital services and technologies.
To classify the assisted living technology and service market from the perspective
of business model development.
To articulate lessons for assisted living from international best practice in
sustainable market development of new digital technologies and services.
To explore barriers and facilitators for sustainable market development of assistive
technologies and services.
To develop case studies to illustrate the success and failure of business models and
market development in assisted living technologies and services for dissemination.
To inform research and debates in other WPs and to inform business practice and
policy.
1.2 Key Findings
The main objective of WP1 is to investigate new business models for sustainable and
scalable market development of Assisted Living Technologies and Services (ALTS).
Our findings are derived from a comprehensive review of previous research and
publications, our own empirical research comprising 31 case studies (18 from the UK
and 13 international), and interviews with experts. The initial results were refined and
validated through four facilitated workshops with key stakeholders, and a range of
dissemination events (e.g. conferences, workshops, discussions). We focus
particularly on digitally enabled ALTS.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 13
The Current State of the ALTS Market: small, fragmented and heterogonous.
The ALTS market is surprisingly small and highly fragmented, and actual market
growth has been significantly slower than previously projected. Large scale
deployment remains rare either in the UK or internationally.
In the UK, the ALTS market is dominated by the state (health and social care). In
comparison the insurance funded market and the self-purchase market are very
small.
Despite the significant long term potential, most ALTS providers are yet to achieve
sustainability and scalability in the conventional business sense, and few
companies are generating sufficient financial returns from their mainstream ALTS
products and services.
The self-purchase market is particularly underdeveloped. Few ALTS providers
have managed to reach significant number of consumers through self-purchase.
The lack of product maturity and common standard and the low levels of
interoperability discouraged investment and prevented people from purchasing
products and services.
Despite strategic interests from some traditional ALTS providers and large
multinationals from other sectors, the ALTS market is primarily served by a large
number of SMEs, many of them new start-ups, with immature products and
business models. Many rely on side activities to sustain their activities, such as
R&D income from different funding bodies, government grants and subsidies, cash
injection from owners or investors, or income from traditional ALTS products and
services.
The ALTS market is highly heterogeneous, which entails significant costs and
risks in developing and supporting new products and services for different market
niches. Most providers lacked the resources, capabilities and large scale
infrastructure required to provide higher value, longer term, contract-based,
supported services, which limited their business model options to providing stand-
alone, single or limited function equipment that are difficult to install, maintain and
use.
The heterogeneous nature of the ALTS market also means that individual market
niches are small. Many ALTS providers find that conventional retail or wholesale
models are insufficient to generate the level of returns required to sustain and scale
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 14
up operations. New business model innovations are required (such as servitization)
to achieve sustainability and scalability.
While effective ALTS innovations do exist, they are generally run by local
champions and are mostly state funded. Most ALTS applications are yet to reach
large scale adoption. Our research has identified a wide range of barriers.
The UK has often been regarded as a world leader in ALTS innovations, although
concrete evidence to support such an assertion is patchy and the lead is being
eroded rapidly in recent years. Some innovative ALTS firms from other countries
are actively exploring different routes to the UK market, and the competition is
intensifying rapidly.
The Notion of ALTS: Lack of conceptual clarity and consistency
The lack of conceptual clarity and consistency in ALTS, although largely
unproblematic in everyday conversations, continues to cause significant problems
when setting boundaries, measuring sizes and impacts, and developing and
implementing business strategies and policies. It leads to inconsistent measures of
user uptake and market potential, and makes it very difficult for businesses to
describe coherent value propositions, customers and market segments, and pricing
and revenue strategies.
The conceptual inconsistency also led to many narratives for assisted living
technologies and services. When making business cases for policy and practice,
people often mix up different perspectives, shifting between reality and rhetoric,
necessity, affordability and desirability, and future aspiration and everyday
practice. This often adds to the confusion and undermines rational debate.
Since many health and social care issues are often emotionally charged, involving
diverse considerations ranging from ethics, obligations and entitlement, equality
and fairness, personal dignity and quality of life, wellbeing and welfare, to cost and
benefit. This has often made rational discussions very difficult when multiple
stakeholders are involved, and it calls for more rigorous theoretical and
methodological guidance in future research and analysis.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 15
Barriers to Market Development and Possible Solutions
The size of the ALTS market is difficult to estimate, partly due to the high level of
informal care that cannot be easily measured. The large number of research and
pilot projects has so far failed to generate concrete, consistent evidence on the
benefits from large scale deployment of ALTS; and the fragmentation of health
and social care and the limited development of the self-purchase market will
continue to hamper the development of sustainable and scalable business models in
this domain.
Due to the rapidly ageing population, the increasing demand for social and health
care cannot be fully met by the state alone. The insurance funded market and the
self-purchase market will need grow significantly which will provide new
opportunities for ALTS providers. However, there are significant cultural barriers
to overcome which call for policy interventions and public debates.
The culture of universal free health care in the UK negatively influences
sustainable ALTS market development when elderly people and/or their relatives
may have to pay for the products and services. However, our empirical
observations reveal that these challenges can be overcome if new products and
services can effectively address user needs and improve the quality of their lives.
We found the Diffusion of Innovation Theory to be a useful framework for
understanding the challenges involved in taking ALTS innovations into the
mainstream market. In particular, product innovations need to address all five
qualities that determine the success of an innovation: (a) relative advantage (b)
compatibility (c) trialability (d) observability, and (e) complexity.
A sustainable business model can be achieved through servitization, a strategic
reorientation allowing firms to broaden their position in the value chain by
generating revenues from services as well as products. The empirical analysis
suggests that users often prefer to be charged for services rather that for the
product or equipment itself. In telecare and telehealth initiatives, revenues can be
generated from the analysis of the data gathered through the use of the products
(e.g. data gathered through tele-rehabilitation processes), or the license fees of the
software they use, as well as directly from selling products and services.
Personalisation of products and services, particularly through user-centred design,
can increase user uptake and ensure business sustainability. For example, devices
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 16
that are easy to use and that users are familiar with for data analysis will make the
products more users friendly. These devices may include general purpose devices
such as mobile phones and TVs. The value propositions need to articulate clearly
the values and benefits that their products have to offer.
To be more sustainable, manufacturers of ALTS products may need to design
products that are extendable to other user groups rather than products that are
exclusively designed for older people. This will help to reduce the barrier posed by
small market size of ALTS products and increase user uptakes and therefore
increase business sustainability.
Recommendations by trusted professionals such as GPs can significantly increase
user acceptability of products and services. For example, a physician may advise a
user that rather than coming to the hospital once per week, the user’s conditions
can be remotely monitored and hospital visit can be reduced to once a month.
Different stakeholders need to work more effectively together to determine where
cost savings are realised and who should pay for some services. The focus should
be on achieving savings at the whole system level, not simply reducing costs in, for
example, social care at the expense of increased health care.
ALTS require close collaboration between different industries, from health and
social care, computing and telecommunications, to manufacturing, home
electronics, transportation and construction. What needs to be developed is not
only a common standard for interoperability, but also a cross-industry eco-system.
This raises significant new challenges that go beyond current mainstream
management practice.
ALTS can play an important part in the management of long term conditions (or
chronic diseases) by delivering effective health and social care services to enable
independent living for older people. However, this can only be achieved by
deploying sustainable and scalable business models and generating healthy
financial returns for the providers. Even though the ultimate objectives are social,
ethical and political, the means to achieve them are financial and economic.
The research also identified significant cultural differences between different
regions and countries which will significantly affect uptake and use. What works
in one country may not translate into success in another. Different business
models may be required when entering international markets.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 17
Other Emerging Challenges
Looking after the older population adequately is a highly desirable social - and
policy - objective, and indeed, a basic condition of a civilised society, but financial
sustainability and affordability of any interventions cannot be overlooked. In other
words, the objectives are social but the means to achieve them are economic. This
call for the development of not only new business models, but also new forms of
organisations that can adequately address challenges.
Different from many other services, the quality of health and social care often
depends not only on professionalism but also genuine compassion and care on a
personal level. You can buy love and care but it would cost a lot of money. So
other incentives and rewards are required. Paying carers low wages while
expecting genuine compassion and consistent high quality services is a tall order.
For old people themselves and their relatives, the focus on cost and profit could
make customers highly sensitive to price. This call for the development of not
only new business models, but new forms of organisations (such as social business)
where success is not only measured in financial terms but also in terms of
contribution to human dignity and to civilization.
1.3 Conclusion
Through a comprehensive review of existing studies on Assisted Living Technologies
and Services (ALTS), we have identified the current trends in digital economy as they
relate to ALTS. We made a clear boundary in the definitions involved in the ALTS
initiative, and investigated and categorised various segments of assisted living market.
Also, various factors that hinder the ALTS commercialisation were presented. The
analysis of the evidence from previous studies reveals that that ALTS market is quite
fragmented and a successful commercialisation into the market requires sustainable
and flexible business models. Furthermore, it can be argued that there have been very
few studies that focus specifically on the business model aspects of assisted living
technologies or its potential segments in the United Kingdom compared to United
States or Scandinavian countries. We discuss that since the country has a traditional
health and social care systems with funding model that is entirely different from those
of other countries such as USA, it is highly necessary to look into business models
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 18
that are sustainable, scalable for the UK context and possibly extendable to other
countries.
Also, the review shows that scholars do not agree on the terms and definitions of
various technologies and services of ALTS and their segments and thus on what their
business models ought to be. This lack of harmony raises doubts concerning the
usefulness of their empirical research and on the quality of research outcomes of these
previous studies which include the data they collected and analysed, and also in terms
of data evaluation approaches. Therefore, we provide a comprehensive up-to-date
literature review on ALTS and their commercialisation attempts and we have
carefully documented the discrepancies and dissonances in those literatures.
Furthermore, the critical review of literature reveals some perceived barriers or
factors that have made ALTS market difficult to develop. However researchers and
academicians agreed that these barriers and factors vary from one segment of ALTS
to another. Hence, we expect that if solutions to these barriers are taken into
consideration as suggested in this section it will have positive impact on sustainability
of ALTS market.
Assisted living technologies might have important roles as part of a strategy for the
management of long term conditions (or chronic diseases) and delivery of effective
health and social care services to enable independent living for older people, however,
the services will only become meaningful to the general public when the business
models are sustainable such that they will provide mutual benefits for providers as
well as the users. In this section, therefore, we focused on two essential approaches to
explain the ways that business models in the context of ALTS in the UK would be
sustainable and scalable. First, we argued that the successful business models will
depend on the capacity to provide very quality (qualities identified in DOI theory)
products and services to the customers at the least cost, high credibility to
stakeholders and generate sustainable revenue streams to the service providers. The
ALTS innovations will spread and business becomes sustainable when they evolve to
meet the needs of successive segments of the population in accordance with the
diffusions of innovation theory. Secondly, we discuss on a workable management
strategies for sustainable business models for e-health innovations which could help
to reduce the pressure on already stretched state funded health and social care services
in the UK and other economies. Our approach suggested the need to move from
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 19
product oriented into product-service business models in order to achieve business
sustainability. Our systematic review offers further avenues for further research on
how servitized-oriented business models would lead to a sustainable market
development within the ALTS industry.
Our analysis from the perspective of diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory showed
that while there have been heavy investments in ALTS, adoption process is still in its
early stages. While effective ALTS innovations certainly exist, they are generally run
by local champions and are mostly state funded. Presently, almost no ALTS
applications (innovations) have been successful in reaching enterprise-wide and large
scale adoption. Various barriers to adoption of ALTS were investigated in this paper
and suggested solutions were prescribed. Through DOI theory, strategic framework
for sustainable business models that could make commercialisation of assisted living
products and services more effective are then presented in an organised manner. Our
case studies analysis gives various insights into commercialisation of ALTS and
strategies for driving ALTS innovations through the ‘Diffusion Chasm’ into the
mainstream markets by segmenting users into different populations based on
individual innovativeness. We provided various characteristics of individuals in each
segment of potential ALTS users as well as suggested strategies to reach them. Our
approach suggests that business model and diffusion of innovation theory are
complements, not substitutes.
There are significant differences between the assisted living technologies and services
markets in the UK and internationally. Based on 13 international case studies and
several interviews with experts from health and social care, we looked at these
differences through a socio-technical lens and categorised our findings/analyses into
four major categories. First we explored and presented the similarities and differences
of the UK and international markets in the regulatory and policy environment. We
found that the notion of ALTS in international markets is less fragmented; and many
international firms, compared to the one from the UK, are financially more
sustainable. This can be attributed to the fact that international firms we studied have
not relied as heavily on the state-funded market. Moreover, many of them are
positively embracing industrial partnerships, as they have learnt that they should be
part of the ALTS eco-system in order to be successful.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 20
We presented three categories of business models for the delivery of telehealth and
telecare services across the world, namely state reimbursement/purchasing model,
insurance-fund reimbursement, and self-purchased market. While we argued that the
self-purchased market is relatively small in the international markets, several
European governments have encouraged the insurance companies to subsidise parts of
the expenses of tele-health services. Relating to the technological (product and
services) issues, we found that the small market size have forced international
companies to diversify their products and services to cover more potential customers
and consumers. However, this has led to a complex maintenance of the heterogeneous
platforms. Subsequently it was discussed that, due to family values and cultural
differences, we should not expect that successful adoption of ALTS in one country
would have similar results in other countries.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 21
Chapter Two
Co-Construction of Shared Visions and Solutions
Work Package Leader:
Dr Rob Wilson, KITE Research Centre/Business School, Newcastle University
Contributing Researchers:
Professor Mike Martin
Antonia Moran
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 22
2.1 Introduction
The contribution of the co-production work package was to capture and analyse the
conversations of the different sorts of actors in sectors that are concerned with
assistive living technologies. We set out to achieve this by taking a co-production
approach to explore the range of concepts, issues and values which are represented
and are of concern. The working definition of co-production was joint production of
public services between citizen and state, with any one of the elements of the
production process being shared” (Mitlin, 2008). Our work was informed by our
knowledge of a simplistic purchaser – provider split is not appropriate in complex
areas of AL/AT in social care. Our starting assumption is that work was required at
the relationships between state agencies and between suppliers and the state (issues of
co-governance in local multi-agency service environments.
To inform this process, we convened a series of meetings and workshops with the
purpose of generating discussion, promoting mutual sense making and capturing the
often subtle and contended positions of actors from public administration, social and
clinical services and practice, the voluntary and third sectors and from commercial
operators. We ran a series of such workshops in collaboration with our WP partners
(Better Living Trust, Age UK Newcastle and NHS Innovations North with input from
other WP partners Docobo and Intrahealth) to co-produce a “big picture”, or, more
precisely, a coherent set of multiple views of a complex environment, within which
the wide range of stances and interests that are represented can be recognised,
positioned, interrelated and evaluated. Our underlying assumption is the range and
complexity of products and services in this market mean that a simplistic top down or
bottom up engagement activity would not address the complexity of the issues. We
turn first to some of the working definitions for this paper and background of the state
of the market followed by a view of the policy context.
2.2 Key Findings
The mixed economy in ALTS remains problematic. A mixed economy relies on
mixing being possible. The current point of mixing at the moment is very much at
the individual and their immediate network/carer level.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 23
This puts the responsibility on the part of the overall system which is probably the
most vulnerable and initially at least unable to cope.
Local authorities responsible for the delivery of personalisation and the not-for-
profit provider sector are struggling to deal with the challenges of providing the
scale required in the creation and support for personal budgets and the information
economy required to produce catalogues of services.
OTs and Nurses (District and Community) have key brokerage roles which lead to
recommendations being made for various ALT products and services to be
provided/recommended.
OTs expressed concerns about issues of status, the amount of discretion they could
exercise and their ability to keep informed about ALT developments and
availability.
District Nurses and Community Nursing were often charged with treating long
term conditions. This cohort of Nurses emphasised that they have to be both
generalists and specialists in different settings and circumstances across the
primary, community and secondary care contexts. ALT is potentially a fantastic
resource in helping them co-produce the best care with patients
Commercial and retail organisations providing products and services into this
fragmented marketplace struggle to move away from providing closed
platforms/integrated solutions to specific conditions and or assistive living
problems. This fragmentation stifles innovation, limits inter-operability and fails to
achieve the potential benefits of network externalities. It also leads to limited
joining up between the commercial and public sector to personalise the
client/patient/customer experience.
On the current trajectory the future development path of the current market is likely to
be threefold:
1. Firstly targeted services being ‘commissioned’ by CCGs and FTs to significant
scale to large non-NHS providers with a focus on Disease (e.g. CHD, CPD) and or
Older People (e.g. Reducing admissions).
2. Secondly any meaningful ‘personalised’ ALT offers a likely be largely self-funded
and separate from public sector provision and governance.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 24
3. Thirdly individuals with complex needs will supported by charities/local
authorities/CCGs as part of a joint support/care package
However it does not necessarily have to unfold in this direction. Strategic and
focussed work at the community level around the challenge of joining-up the joining
up to develop and improve the resources for service co-ordination would provide
significant opportunities for the creation of a brokerage and intermediation
environment populated by those best placed to deliver: primarily those with existing
care and support relationships with those in need of assistance for living.
2.3 Conclusion
The mixed economy in ALT remains problematic. A mixed economy relies on mixing
being possible. The current point of mixing at the moment is very much at the
individual and their immediate network/carer level. This puts the responsibility on the
part of the overall system which is probably the most vulnerable and initially at least
unable to cope.
Local authorities responsible for the delivery of personalisation and the not-for-profit
provider sector are struggling to deal with the challenges of providing the scale
required in the creation and support for personal budgets and the information
economy required to produce catalogues of services. Work with OTs and Nurses
(District and Community) revealed their brokerage role in the assessment processes
(for people in a range of contexts supported and self-funded) which lead to
recommendations being made for various ALT products and services to be
provided/recommended. OTs expressed concerns about issues of status, the amount of
discretion they could exercise and their ability to keep informed about ALT
developments and availability. District Nurses and Community Nursing were often
charged with treating long term conditions. This cohort of Nurses emphasised that
they have to be both generalists and specialists in different settings and circumstances
across the primary, community and secondary care contexts. ALT is potentially a
fantastic resource in helping them produce the best care for their patients
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 25
Commercial and retail organisations providing products and services into this
fragmented marketplace struggle to move away from providing closed
platforms/integrated solutions to specific conditions and or assistive living problems.
This fragmentation stifles innovation, limits inter-operatability and fails to achieve the
potential benefits of network externalities. It also leads to limited joining up between
the commercial and public sector to personalise the client/patient/customer
experience. The routes of the diverse economy paths to the ALT is demonstrated in
the Figure below:
On current trajectories the future development path of the current market is likely to
be threefold. Firstly targeted services being ‘commissioned’ by CCGs and FTs to
significant scale to large non-NHS providers with a focus on Disease (e.g. CHD,
CPD) and or Older People (e.g. Reducing admissions). Secondly any meaningful
‘personalised’ ALT offers a likely be largely self-funded and separate from public
sector provision and governance. Thirdly individuals with complex needs will
supported by charities/local authorities/CCGs as part of a joint support/care package.
Primary and
Community
Care
Acute CareTertiary
Care
Domestic Care
Assistive Technology Products and Services
GenericTargetedSpecialised
Clinical “Push”
Client “Pull”
32
4
The recognition of a need and the
possibility of a solution
1
Self or family directed
initiatives to find solutions
to needs.
1
Care planning on a
discharge back into
primary from Acute Care.
2
Responding to changing
patient needs in
Community Care.
4
3
Highly Qualified
Unqualified
Hig
hly
Specia
lised
Genera
list
Care planning for
rehabilitation after complex
specialist treatment.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 26
Chapter Three
Economic Modelling
Work Package Leader:
Professor John Wildman, Business School (Economics), Newcastle University
Contributing Researcher:
Dr Peter McMeekin
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 27
3.1 Introduction
The aim of this work package was to investigate the economics issues surrounding
ALTs. Using economic theory and econometric methods this work package
considered four main areas: the cost-effectiveness of ALTs, the market for social care,
the relationship between health and social care and the impact of ALTs on the health
of a cohort of 85 plus individuals.
The objectives of this project were to:
Investigate economic models in the area of social care (Deliverable 1 and
deliverable 5)
Identify costs of an ageing population (Deliverable 1, deliverable 3 and
deliverable 4)
Identify benefits of ALTs (Deliverable 3, deliverable 4, deliverable 5,
deliverable 6)
Consider costs and benefits alongside work package 1 (Deliverable 1 and
deliverable 3)
Evaluate approaches and make a recommendation (Deliverable 3, deliverable
4 deliverable 5, deliverable 6)
The objectives were chosen in order to cover a range of ageing and social care issues.
Also they provided a way to investigate the key economic issues associated with
ageing and ALTs.
There were four main approaches used as part of WP3. The first was the use of a
systematic review. These methods allow researchers to identify and evaluate the key
papers in an area of research. The methods are robust and replicable allowing others
to reproduce the search outcomes and to give insight into the quality of papers
considered. Key words and key terms for the review have been available and
references for all of the quality assurance measures clearly referenced.
The second method was the application of economics models to the ageing and ALT
market. Economics provides an insight into the working of markets and how
economic agents interact. This provides two key insights, firstly it is possible to
describe observed behaviour. Secondly, it is possible to investigate what will happen
when there are changes in the market.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 28
The third method was the use of economic theory to model individual behaviour.
Economics has provided many approaches for considering the way individuals act and
we apply two that are particularly pertinent for the areas of health and social care, and
for ALTs. These are the Grossman (1972) model – a model of household production
as applied to health. And the Lancaster (1966) model – a model of household
production focused on attributes with a particular focus on the ability to model new
products (which is especially pertinent for ALTs).
Finally econometric methods were applied to secondary data to investigate the role of
benefits, and potential cost savings. As SALT did not involve the creation of data – it
was not part of an evaluation of ALTs – it was not possible to use primary data
sources. Data with ALTs was identified and panel data models were applied to these
data to investigate how the ownership and use of ALTs affected two health outcomes.
The data are a longitudinal cohort of individuals who were first interviewed at the age
of 85.
3.2 Key Findings
Market failure is a problem for social care. Similar to the health sector, and partly
because of the link to the health sector, social care exhibits many elements of
market failure leading to efficiency and equity problems.
Problems in the insurance market mean that there are problems identifying who
should pay for social care. Failure in the insurance market requires government
intervention. Intervention means that individuals do not insure (privately) to
protect against old age. This leads to individuals not engaging in the market.
The lack of engagement in markets means that individuals may be unfamiliar with
purchasing devices and services that make up the ALT sector.
Evidence supporting the use of ALTs is limited, especially in terms of cost-
effectiveness.
Evaluation methods need to be developed and extended that can analyse the
impacts of ALTs.
A systematic review of the literature demonstrated a dearth of publication in this
area. Without robust evidence of cost-effectiveness the opportunities for growth in
the market may be limited.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 29
The presence of a very large health sector may crowd out possibilities in the social
care. The problem of crowding out is potentially the largest issue facing the ALT
market. Whether because of the size of the health sector, the potential problems of
supplier induced demand, or because of user expectations it is difficult for ALT
markets to grow
There are incentives in the funding mechanism that mean that individuals are more
likely to use health care services, when social care services and ALTs are more
appropriate.
Health and social care provide attributes that individuals value. There may be
considerable overlap in the attributes provided meaning that health and social care
become viewed as substitutes rather than complements.
Obtaining values for the attributes offered by ALTs would help the development
and marking of ALTs. It would offer insights into the important characteristics that
ALTs offer.
The use of ALTs (traditional types) is associated with individuals of lower health.
The use of ALTs delays deterioration in disability and depression among the oldest
age groups (85 plus).
3.3 Conclusion
Most markets have some element of market failure, and in the presence of market
failures, markets are often inefficient. In many cases the presence of market failure
leads to some form of government intervention, either directly, with the government
providing the service, or more indirectly through regulation and monitoring. The
health sector is widely considered to be unique because of the number of types of
market failure that are present. A similar analysis of the social care market has been
conducted as part of the SALT project and it can be shown that social care shares
many of the characteristics of the health market.
Insurance is one of the key mechanisms for dealing with uncertainty in outcomes, and
the ageing process clearly demonstrates many areas of uncertainty. However, the
market in this area is not well developed - and this is partly due to issues of adverse
selection and moral hazard, but also due to the presence of a large, public, compulsory
health insurance scheme in the form of the NHS. This latter issue is further developed
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 30
in tasks three and five. Without private spending on social care there may be few
incentives to invest in ALTs, especially if there is a sense that many of the benefits of
ALTs should be provided by the health service.
In terms of service provision it is possible to view health and social care through the
lens of supplier induced demand, and the incentives inherent in the funding and
expenditure mechanisms for health and social care that may lead to sub-optimal
outcomes. It is interesting to note that the government has made increasing steps to
ingegrate health and social care during the life time of this project.
(https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/making-sure-health-and-social-care-
services-work-together). Further complecations arise if there are supplier induced
demand issues from actors within the health service. It is often suggested in health
economics that doctors induce supply in order to maximise their own utility. It may be
that many older individuals are encouraged to use the health service by doctors as part
of supplier induced demand.
There are also key issues of equity that are present in the area of social care. If social
care in increasingly left to the market, or if there are more areas of social care where
there are market forces then it may be possible for inequities to arise. Should there be
a concern for access, and should there be some notion of need? If the answer to these
is 'yes' then should there be some element of 'equal access for equal need'. And from
this should there be adjustments for vertical equity.
Finally, as part of the work on benefits, we have used a secondary data set that
contains information on the ownership and use of ALTs, as well as comprehensive
data on disability and depression. The data set provides information the ownship and
use of a range of traditional ALTs, and while this does not provide direct information
on high technology ALTS going forward, it does provide an insight into the general
use of ALTs. The data are taken from a cohort of 85 plus individuals living in the
Newcastle upon Tyne area.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 31
Chapter Four
User Uptake
Work Package Leader:
Dr Katie Brittain, Institute of Health and Society (IHS)/Medical School, Newcastle
University
Contributing Researchers:
Dr Gary Pritchard
Dr Tracy Finch
Professor Louise Robinson
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 32
4.1 Introduction
Older people are a heterogeneous group with a range of social and health care needs.
It is generally recognized that, to an extent at least, the care and support of older
people can be enhanced through technology. In recent years the UK government and a
range of other agencies have advocated Assistive Technology (AT) as a key tool in
addressing the plethora of care-related costs associated with more and more people
living in their homes who will have limitations in mobility, dexterity and mental
capacity.
WP4 addressed the problem of uptake, use and integration of AT, acknowledging that
a deeper understanding is needed of the personal and social meanings that people
attach to technologies and how the use of them are embedded within their social
context and everyday lives. Despite the perceived benefits of AT, evidence suggests
that uptake and use among older people has been low with a large survey conducted
by Phillips and Zhao (1993) finding that almost a third of all devices are completely
abandoned. There is a need therefore to understand how AT is embedded into the
lives of older people so that when emerging AT is developed the social environment
in which they are to be used is taken into account. Otherwise these technologies could
be developed out of context and run the risk of being abandoned or not used. A
further aim is to develop solutions to promote more effective integration of AT into
users’ everyday lives.
The background of this research is the growing awareness of the ways AT can support
older people to remain independent and also make the care of older people sustainable
while the population ages at an unprecedented rate. This WP used qualitative research
methods in order to look at older people’s current use of AT, they attitudes towards it
and critically examine how these influence the uptake, usage and abandonment of AT.
In this, we adopt a social science approach that draws upon a number of theoretical
perspectives from sociology, psychology and technology studies. Our work not only
explored people’s perceptions towards AT but also looked at the best way to connect
people to telecare and other ATs. The focus of the work within this WP was to
understand the factors that promote or inhibit the uptake and how ATs are used and
integrated into the lives of older people.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 33
This chapter is divided into 4 substantive sections that are based on the original
research questions contained in the second level plan. The first section explores
current perspectives on the role of AT; the second looks at uptake, use and integration
of AT by current users; the third discusses the role of the informal carer in supporting
‘ageing in place’ and the final section examines the needs and preferences of future
AT users.
The overall aim of WP4 was to gain an understanding of older people’s use of AT.
This is further broken down into 7 discreet project objectives:
1. To understand the context for maximising the potential of AT by exploring
people’s current attitudes and future expectations of AT and care in the
community
2. To describe how AT is currently accepted (or not) and integrated (or not) into
the everyday lives of older people
3. To understand how ‘need’ is conceptualised by individuals in the provision of
AT, and how this impacts on the acceptability and use of AT in the home
context
4. To explore the attitudes and future needs of the next generation of older people
with regard to AT
5. To explore the role of ‘choice’ in developing economic and business solutions
6. To understand the caring activities undertaken to support older people living
in the community.
7. To identify key concerns of current and future AT users and inform other WPs
on an on-going basis
4.2 Key Findings
WP4 adopted a sociological perspective in order to explore issues surrounding
older people’s use of AT. The specific focus was to look at social factors that could
encourage or discourage older people’s AT use. This was then separated into 4
broad areas of study: 1) current perspectives on AT; 2) uptake, use and integration
by current users; 3) AT and informal care and 4) understanding future AT users.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 34
The findings highlight a consensus on a range of issues and are derived from a
comprehensive review of previous research and publications and this WP’s in-
depth qualitative research. The methods used consisted of interviews, focus groups,
workshops and observational fieldwork.
Current perspectives on AT. We found that older people’s perceptions towards AT
varied greatly depending on the category of AT and level of disability and health
of our participants. Perspectives on AT depended in large to factors external to the
individual, for example awareness, cost, method of provision (i.e. private or public)
and also the type of assessment and consultation provided by ‘experts’. The
concepts of ‘independence’ and ‘stigma’ were shown to be important personal
influences that affected how older people view AT.
Uptake, use and integration of AT by current users. AT has the potential to shape
social relations surrounding the care of older people. Our analysis highlighted
some of the unanticipated social consequences of the deployment of the alarm
pendent, thus again showing how the social environment impacts on the use and
function of AT. Negative effects of alarm pendants are not the result of malevolent
intention on the part of those who design or operate these systems but rather, they
are a by-product of the practices and functional requirements of the device, as it is
currently conceived. Specifically, on occasion, these devices are not effective or
efficient; they can shift extra work onto older people and their carers; they can
work to dehumanize an older person by causing stigma and changing the
relationship of care. However, older people can subvert the intended function of
alarm pendants and resist these dehumanization effects by using the device
selectively, or not at all.
AT and informal care. Informal care involves a life change for both the carer and
the care recipient. Informal carers are often the primary user of an AT. Carers can
use AT to leverage a range of caring activities, making them less intensive and
demanding. Decisions on buying AT are mainly made jointly and based on
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 35
practical circumstances and perceived usefulness. AT has the potential to change
the meaning of the home, in a negative way.
Understanding future AT users. Awareness and information about AT among the
general public is currently very low. Future users are capable of imagining how
technology could be integrated into their lives as they age. This group are generally
positive about the potential of digital technologies to help them in a variety of
ways (including providing aid in sensitive activities like toileting and bathing;
lifestyle advice; tracking medical information and as an emergency backup).
Participants generally didn’t like the concept of devices that are aimed specifically
at older people. A key factor in the acceptability of AT for future users was
whether or not the equipment would be provided by the state. Participants were
concerned with the ways AT might adversely affect sociability, human contact and
privacy. However some of these concerns can be eased through design.
4.3 Conclusion
As stated at the onset, the aim of this section is not to criticize alarm pendants or
telecare as a whole but rather to unpick some of the negative and unanticipated
consequences of use. However, it should be understood that there are positive effects
and is used by lots of people for many different reasons. In our research we witnessed
it’s perceived usefulness for people who are vulnerable to falling and those who enjoy
the reassurance of knowing a friendly voice is available at the touch of a button. The
device can be especially helpful for peoplewith long-term conditions, as it can give
them and their relatives a peace of mind that they’re safe in their own home. They can
also facilitate people living more independently in their own home for
longer, avoiding a hospital stay or delaying the move into a residential care facility.
We should also be careful not to compare current practices, which integrate the use of
pendant alarms with an unrealistic and overly romantic perception of traditional care.
Overall, this section has illustrated that just as a technology can mediate and shape a
social environment and relationships, they in turn can shape the function and uses of a
technology. The technology we have scrutinized is the alarm pendent, a device
deployed to streamline the care of older people. Alarm pendants are based on
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 36
relatively unsophisticated technology and developments in this sector are expanding
rapidly and future assistive living technologies are likely to move away from first
generation device we have described in this paper. The potential for alarm pendants to
dehumanize and produce irrational social outcomes will depend therefore, in part, on
the development of the industry. For instance, if they adopt more digital participation
services – designed to stimulate social interaction – then potentially they can increase
a sense of community and counteract processes of dehumanization. Other
developments could allow users more agency and choice in the device they are
provided with, by having for instance, more flexibility that permit the choice to
activate multiple buttons to better communicate the urgency of help needed.
Providing older people with simple reminders of their agency is highly important
because it has been shown to significantly prolong life while the removal of agency
has been illustrated to lead others to treat them as uncivilized and irrational. Future
assistive technologies could also be more flexible and ensure choice and be
configured in a way to allow the user to choose who gets alerted when an alarm is
activated.
A further negative social effect of alarm pendent use we identified in our research was
its potential to cause deindividualization. Presently, older people who have a pendent
alarm are anonymous. There is a possibility of counteracting this by ensuring that
teleoperators have more information about the person they are remotely caring for. As
well as their name and other basic information, they could be provided with an outline
of their personal history, including their previous occupations, hobbies and family
life. The use of video would be a positive move to counteract the deindividualization
processes implicit in alarm pendant use.
Our argument here is that technological change in the field of gerontology is
something which older people and other users of assistive technology need to actively
shape, rather than respond to. These users should be consulted about the kind of
relationship they want from their caregiver and broader society should also reflect on
the type of relationship it want with its older citizens. We also argue that there is a
need for on-going engagement with older people and the users of such devices in the
design, development of technologies that are embedded within decisions of care.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 37
Currently, very little empirical research exists on how the social environment affects
alarm pendant use. A productive development in the study of gerontology and
technology would assess the impact of telecare on different social environments of
care and also how different social and cultural environments of care affect the use and
function of technological devices.
Following much of STS research, this section argues against the theory of
technological determinism – that is, the belief that technology develops in isolation
from society but in turn impacts upon it. The very development and promotion of the
alarm pendent as part of the solution to reduce care-related costs incurred by the
government shows that innovation doesn’t occur immune from the concerns of
society. Despite the designed intention of this device, the evidence of its effectiveness
is scare and the largest study conducted to date has shown no significant cost-
reductions. We argue that this is perhaps because adequate attention was not afforded
to the broader social environment in which they are deployed. In short, it seems the
advocates of alarm pendants subscribe to an understanding of the discredited (in STS
at least) model of technological determinism.
Our work with future users of AT identified important concerns people have about
future AT provision. In this section we first explores the acceptability of different
forms of AT in supporting our participants complete a variety of tasks. In this,
explored people’s perspectives towards technology specifically designed for older
people and viewpoints over who should fund future AT provision. Our second
substantive section analysed perceptions towards the potential of different forms of
AT to impact (both positively, and negatively) sociability and human contact. We
then looked at issues surrounding privacy and trust.
What inferences can be made from data from future users? Our conversations with
future users of AT was, by necessity, speculative. How expectations about futures
corresponds to what happens in reality is contested. From within the history of
technology there are important accounts of how expectations change over time, and
particularly longer time spans, in relation to various ‘real time’ factors. This shows,
for example, that expectations tend to reflect current conceptions of technological
utility or, as Marvin puts it, ‘the tendency of every age to read the future as a fancier
version of the present’. This characteristic is also clearly visible in the genre of
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 38
science-fiction and the tendency to reflect present day concerns and hopes. We used
these visions as a starting point because users were familiar with robots etc. through
popular science fiction representations.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 39
Chapter Five
User-Centred Design
Work Package Leader:
Professor Peter Wright, School of Computing Science, Newcastle University
Contributing Researchers:
Dr John Vines
Professor Patrick Olivier
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 40
5.1 Introduction
To make electronic and digital ALTS acceptable to those who may purchase, use and
live with them, technology designers and ALTS companies and organisations need to
develop a richer understanding of who ‘the user’ is that is being designed for. This
richer conception requires us to reframe the problem and design space of ALTS, and
to explore and develop new methods for organisations to richly engage with the lived
experience of those that might benefit from technologies to support their daily living.
We no longer simply use technology, rather we live it, and that in order to design
technologies and services that are aesthetically pleasing, flexible, support changing
needs, increase users' independence and empower them, we need to develop design
methods that yield a deep understanding of the experience of both living with
technology, and living with chronic illness and chronic conditions.
In recent years, there have been a number of developments in the field of human-
computer interaction (HCI) and broader design disciplines where researchers have
developed a myriad of new methods for exploring people’s experiences in depth.
Many of these new methods provide techniques and tools that support researchers and
designers in undertaking structured activities and engagements with users that elicit
discussions around peoples’ current experiences of technology and the implications
future technologies may have on their lives both as they exist now and how they may
exist in the future. This has included using speculative films as a way of capturing the
experiences of users (Raijmakers et al. 2006) or as a way of provoking responses from
users in design workshops (Briggs et al. 2012). Others have used interactive forms of
theatrical performances (Newell et al. 2006) or carefully crafted objects that are
‘completed’ by users in their homes to highlight what is meaningful and important to
them in their lives (Wallace et al. 2013). Many of these new approaches draw upon
developments in the arts, design and social sciences which argue for a more
interpretive and reflexive approach to social and experiential enquiry, which are
increasingly used in experience-centred design of new forms of communication
technology (Wright et al. 2008), the co-design of health services, and the co-design of
technology for the older old in residential homes (Blythe et al. 2010), and working
with people with dementia and their carers (Lindsay et al. 2012).
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 41
The main objective of SALT WP5 was to explore how these emerging experience-
centred design methods might be used in the context of ALTS. In order to explore
these, we worked with three of SALTs industrial partners to define and conduct three
separate case studies. These case studies responded primarily to the immediate
ambitions of each organisation, which provided a context within which we were able
to define a design brief. Importantly, each of the industry partners wished to explore
issues that were quite radically different from each other (e.g. platforms for ratings
and reviews of consumer ALTS, schemes and services to support new forms of
voluntary community care, and app-based wearable and mobile healthcare) but issues
that are still of central concern to the future sustainability of older adult health and
care.
Having defined each case study, the WP5 team developed an experience-centred
methodology for each that provided a means to explore the potential of new design
methods to support the exploration of these contexts with potential users. The
methods chosen responded to the issues and ambitions of each of the case study
partners and allow users to have a voice in the design of future ALTS that may impact
upon their lives.
Through the completion of these case studies, we aimed to make three overall
contributions to the domain of ALTS. First, through the conduct of each case study
with project partners we aimed to make the findings immediately relevant and useable
to these companies, and as such support them in introducing new types of ALTS that
will be meaningful and used by the intended user groups. Second, we wished to
provide rich qualitative insights about these emerging areas of importance in ALTS
that would be of relevance to academics and industrial stakeholders working in the
domain. Third, we aimed to develop a deeper understanding of the efficacy of the
design methods, establishing how they support the revealing of rich insights about the
lives of potential ALTS users, and in what ways they promoted the generation of new
ideas or insights into how future technologies and services may support the lives of
these individuals.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 42
5.2 Key Findings
The main objective of WP5 is to investigate user-centered design methods that allow
researchers, companies and organisations working in the domain of Assisted Living
Technologies and Services (ALTS) to involve potential customers and users in the
design, research and development of new products and services. Our findings are
derived from three design case studies that were conducted over the course of WP5’s
2-year period of activity on SALT. These case studies were developed in close
collaboration with three of the project’s industrial partners. Our case studies were
focused around studying 3 main types of design method that responded to the specific
case study context driven by our partners, but also involved the use and development
of a total of 23 different design tools and techniques. Our findings come in two forms.
First, we provide rich insights about potential users and consumers of ALTS based on
our three case studies, each of which tackled challenges that are becoming
increasingly important for ALTS companies and organisations to be aware of and to
respond to. The key findings in relation to our case studies are:
Our first case study focused on using Film as a tool to provoke discussions and
generate ideas surrounding peer-to-peer and user-generated approaches to
developing information, advice and recommendation schemes for ALTS. We
highlight how the first step for enhancing the lived experience of ALTS for
consumers and users is to raise public awareness of what is available. Our central
message here is that the future of the ALTS market is dependent upon providing
tools and platforms for the public to create their own knowledge resources that can
be shared with and by peers. We highlight a range of barriers to trusting online
content surrounding ALTS use, many of which come down to issues related to the
provenance of information and the need to get ‘hands on experiences’ of aids and
equipment. Therefore, rather than just focusing on recommendations and review,
these platforms and tools need to provide ways for people to be directed towards
locally accessible resources, facilities and members of their local community that
can provide experiences of ALTS and share advice face-to-face. This requires
support by key trusted representatives, advocacy groups and stakeholders in the
ALTS domain in order to generate wide participation and support accessing hard to
reach groups and individuals.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 43
Our second case study focused on using Theatre to explore the potential
implications and aspirations surrounding future intergenerational community care
schemes and services. Our case study highlighted how there are huge significant
challenges facing the introduction of reward schemes in the context of community
care. We should avoid designing technologies that add simplistic reward systems
for volunteering based on how much time they spend with people or the ‘depth’ of
the activity and duties they perform. The primary value of voluntary care was seen
to be in its personalised qualities, where carers respond to the fluctuating needs of
the person they visit. Instead, we should look at forms of rewards that support the
exchange of appreciation and ‘gifts’ between those who receive care and those that
give it, rewarding those that are more responsive to the individuals they visit.
Furthermore, technology can play a role here in improving the experience of care.
This includes information sharing services, enhanced timetabling and co-
ordination activities, and systems that give greater awareness to care recipients
about who to expect a visit from and when.
Our third case study focused on using the new Google Glass technology as a
provocative prototype to engage people with Parkinson’s in exploring the potential
of wearable technologies to monitor their health and wellness. We noted how
mobile and wearable technologies provide opportunities for individuals with
conditions and ailments to self-track, monitor and enhance their personal
understanding of their condition and provide increased confidence and sense of
independence. The rising popularity and lower barriers of access to consumer
mobile and wearable technologies provides new opportunities for ALTS
companies to create resources, tools and applications for individuals to track and
monitor their health. Engaging with people living with specific conditions and
diseases at an early stage of developing such applications can reveal new design
opportunities that differ from those that might be prioritised by health service
providers and medical experts. As such, designing from the ‘bottom-up’ and
creating applications that are driven by end-user aspirations and sensemaking
around their condition rather than ‘top-down’ from the needs of service providers
provides a rich space to explore new business models around emerging
technologies.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 44
Second, we provide insights about the specific qualities of the design methods we
used, how they might be used by companies and other researchers, when in the
design, development and research process to use them, and the types of insights that
may emerge from their use. The key findings in relation to our design methods work
are:
Throughout our case studies with partners, we noted how there is great enthusiasm
for greater user and consumer consultation in the design and development of ALTS
but significant barriers to companies actually conducting these types of design
activities. The primary limitation is time. One challenge that all organisations in
this domain face is committing time and effort to undertaking design work that
involves potential users from an early stage of development. We noted how there is
sometimes a preference from some organisations to have insights provided to them,
preferring to be informed about user insights and not directly engage with them.
We responded to this during the project by going beyond our main 3 design
methods and developing an array of different methods that are more lightweight,
quicker and simpler to make, and involve less resource investment. These methods
require different degrees of effort and time, can be used at different stages of a
project, involve different levels of user and consumer involvement, and can result
in different types of insight. These may be used by a company to undertake design
activities directly with prospective users or customers, or to reflect on insights
provided by others who have been commissioned to undertake these activities.
We have developed an outline for a participatory innovation toolkit (PIT) for
ALTS that packages up the various methods we have used for organisations
operating within the ALTS domain to undertake their own user-centered design
activities with potential users in the future. In developing the toolkit we aimed to
synthesise insights gained from across the three main design case studies. In
particular, we looked to identify what are the core stages of undertaking design
consultation processes with end-users. Through our use of 23 different tools during
the SALT project, we have developed 5 different stages of participatory innovation
for ALTS. We have categorised and documented our various different methods in
terms of which of these different stages they support, and at the end of this report
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 45
provide detail about when to use specific methods and how they may be used in
practice.
5.3 Conclusion
We have undertaken three detailed design case studies where people that are existing
users ALTS or potential future users, consumers or beneficiaries of such products and
services have been involved in envisioning the future of ALTS delivery in the UK.
Although each of our case studies were rather diverse, they each represented the great
value of collaborating with a wide range of stakeholders and user groups right from
the very start of a design process. The aim of each of the case studies was to explore
what is often termed the ‘messy front end’ of design —i.e., the space at the beginning
of a design process where the opportunities for what the eventual product or service
may be are diverse and ill-defined. Through our design activities and workshops with
participants at this stage of design, opportunities were presented for these potential
users of ALTS to have a voice in the decisions made around their development. As
highlighted in both case study 1 and case study 2, these engagements alerted us and
our case study partners to the dangers inherent in making poor decisions at this early
stage of design. Furthermore, in the context of case study 3, we have highlighted how
engaging with users at this early stage reveals a different set of issues to design
around when compared to designing for a specific group through a clinical
collaboration. Indeed, through our early engagement with our volunteers with
Parkinson’s we have formed a group of ‘lead users’ who are highly motivated and
willing to continue working with us and our partner in the development of new Apps
on the Google Glass device.
Although each of our case studies highlighted diverse issues related to the design and
delivery of future ALTS, there are a number of areas that need to be further examined
in future work. This is especially important given that our case studies have not led to
the creation of finalised technologies, products and services—the aim of each was to
undertake early scoping activities with users and derive requirements and implications
for future ALTS. Each of our individual case studies highlight a diverse range of
opportunities for the future development of these ideas, which are detailed at length
within each of the case study reports.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 46
There is also much more work to be done in the context of studying how the types of
design methods used during our project may influence future ALTS innovation. Our
case studies were designed so that the research team led the research and design
process and conducted the vast majority of user engagement activities. While our case
study partners had a significant involvement in providing us with a context to conduct
our work and contributed to the development of the methodological approaches, we
failed to achieve a situation where our partners were able to lead sessions and the
analysis of insights. Therefore there is still much work to be done around how these
design methods may be made less resource intensive but still meaningful to such
organisations in the future. While it was not possible to finalise an online toolkit in
the time-span of WP5, we envision that an important focus point of future work will
be to refine the methods described here and make them openly available online for
organisations to use. However, it is not just important to make the materials of these
methods available to use, but also to provide detailed instructions of how they can be
used, providing ways for templates to be modified to fit specific contexts, and
developing ways for ALTS companies and organisations to document their use and
feed their knowledge back to the wider ALTS community. Furthermore, while we had
a great amount of success with our lightweight paper-based resources, the most
innovative methods that used film, theatre and prototype are those that also come with
the most resource intensity to develop and deliver. Future work will have to examine
in more detail how these approaches can be made simpler to use or easier to
commission.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 47
Chapter Six Synthesis, Dissemination and Engagement
Work Package Leader:
Graham Armitage, Institute of Ageing and Health/Medical School, Newcastle
University
Contributing Researcher:
Dr Lynne Corner
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 48
6.1 Introduction
It is assumed that there is a substantial and growing global market for assisted living
technologies. It is also assumed that these will be ICT type technologies, which are
known from experience to have high growth potential. Businesses from the UK have
been amongst the first movers in the field, so Assisted Living should represent a huge
opportunity for UK Plc.
The opportunity has been well tended, with significant sums of UK Government and
European money provided for research and development and for pilot deployments of
these technologies. So what we really wanted to understand was why there isn't a
thriving assisted living industry, why ALT businesses seem to be highly dependent on
research and development funding, why ALT has not yet become embedded at scale,
and what needs to be done to change that.
6.2 Key Findings
What are Assisted Living Technologies?
This was a challenge for the project. Whilst Assisted Living Technologies is a
description which is becoming more commonly used, it encompasses a wide range of
equipment, which has previously often been described in other ways.
Telecare has been used generally to describe tools that mitigate risk or
apparent risk for vulnerable people. These have mostly been products such as
fall alarms or personal alarms but also encompass sensors and automation
which reduces risk. More recently, remote communication devices intended
for use between vulnerable adults and their carers have also been included.
Some of these take the form of complex tool sets intended to facilitate
communication between multiple carers and the cared for person.
Telehealth has been used to describe tools aimed at supporting optimum
management of long term conditions. This includes remote monitoring of
various measures by clinical teams and electronic information or prompts for
patients.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 49
Telemedicine probably doesn't fall within the scope of Assisted Living since it
is generally defined as the electronic transfer of patient information between
clinicians. However, it utilises the same technologies and encounters the same
challenges of data security and provenance as telehealth and is therefore likely
to be have a substantial overlap in commissioning organisations, clinical users,
and providers. Moreover, the term is also sometimes used interchangeably
with telehealth, whilst e-health covers both, plus electronic health self-
management for prevention.
Then of course there are a range of devices which are used to support
independent living, from walking sticks to complex automated wheelchairs,
toilets and the like. It is not clear how 'electronic' these would need to be to
qualify as ALT.
Nevertheless, skills for care include telecare, telehealth and assistive technology
equipment in ALT for the purposes of their guidance and recommend their use
together as part of an effective strategy. So perhaps part of the problem is that we tend
to think about them very separately, and procure them differently within traditional
but potentially ambiguous silos. Others have suggested that the separate
identification of these forms of equipment as a ‘special’ market is part of the problem,
suggesting that neither telehealth nor telecare will thrive until they are understood as
just elements of the delivery of good quality care.
Business Models
Key to successful business models is an analysis of the benefit provided, the
customers to whom it will be provided, the market through which it will be delivered
and which is of sufficient size to sustain the offer at an acceptable unit cost, and the
ability and willingness of customers to pay more than the cost of the intervention.
The Market
Well there is certainly a substantial care market, £17 billion per year is spent by
Government on adult social care in the UK alone. There is also a substantial but less
well understood level of informal care, provided by friends and families. These costs
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 50
are driven primarily by long term conditions, which are accumulating in the
population because people live longer with them and because the population is ageing
and age is the single biggest risk factor for most of these conditions. 15 milliom
people in the UK have a long term condition, and their care accounts for 70% of the
health and social care budget. So there is a large and growing market for care. But
how this translates to a demand for technology is far less clear and will inevitably be
dependent on the value which can be offered.
Value
All of these tools produce different benefits for different people, which suggests the
need for different business models. Providing value is a matter of cost / quality trade
off. Since quality is often subjective this may include perceptions of quality which
differ between individuals. Providing technology as an addition may improve quality
but almost certainly at increased cost. Technology that substitutes for more expensive
personal attention may save money but be perceived as reducing quality. Assisted
living technology has traditionally been strongly technology driven and arguably the
failure to clearly identify the benefit to be delivered by these technologies is a key
element in the failure of the market to develop.
Telecare - Business Models
It seems likely that the majority of care will continue to be provided face to face.
ALT is not going to help disabled or frail older people to wash, dress and feed
themselves, at least not yet. And while communications technology is a good
supplement for a personal presence, people are very concerned about it becoming a
replacement.
'You can't hold someone's hand through a computer'
Telecare, in the form of alarms does relatively little for the cared for person, it does
not prevent adverse events, although some newer technologies can potentially predict
them or at least demonstrate a trend for increasing concern and vigilance. However
they have added value for local authorities. By mitigating the potentially
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 51
unacceptable impact of someone, for example falling in their own home and not being
found for a long time, they reduce public and family concern at older people
remaining in their own home rather than institutional care. Institutional care
provision can be reduced and replaced with domicilary care. This has supported huge
(albeit virtual, given the growth in numbers) savings in social care, and local
authorities have been content to pay for that benefit.
This has to some extent served to focus the telecare market on a small segment of the
market, defined by those people entitled to Local Authority care. Whilst the number
of people needing this level of support continues to grow, government funding is
static, shrinking in real terms, essentially limiting the further growth in the market.
So rather than a growing market in this space we have a stagnant one, arguably
adequately provided for by the early entrant businesses. Improvements to the
technology to analyse trends and anticipate crises are expensive and provide little or
no additional advantage to the local authority funder.
So how do we expand the market. Similar benefits could be made available to
informal family carers, which would greatly expand the potential market. New
technologies could be offered to family carers and cared for people directly, since
both are actively seeking to avoid crisis events, and some businesses are starting to
move in this direction. But this would require a very differently shaped business, and
begs the question of how members of the general public would learn about the use of
assisted living technology and obtain advice on which devices to purchase. What is
clear is that this is an area that is poorly provided for.
Telehealth – Business Models
Telehealth has proved itself a hard market to enter. Clinical pathways are strongly
controlled by healthcare professionals, particularly clinicians. Where they are
motivated to use technology, they are inclined to seek solutions which operate without
adaptation to their normal ways of working. These therefore need to be low cost,
since there are few savings from which they could be funded. Technologies which
use ubiquitous technology -such as text messaging on mobile phones to prompt
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 52
actions - are easily deployed, cheap and improve compliance and therefore outcomes.
These are showing some success.
On the other hand, solutions which have been developed through access to research
and development funding tend to be more specialist, complex and expensive,
particularly in small numbers. Potentially more effective at introducing efficiencies,
they would do so by impacting on existing pathways and are often highly constrained
by data management requirements. Where clinicians have shown interest, they often
require bespoke solutions which fit their way of working. As a result, the market,
whilst large and growing, is fragmented into tiny packages by clinical condition,
pathway variations and commissioning priorities.
So much for the large market: in fact the market is rather small and highly
fragmented, requiring small numbers of therefore premium solutions, which is fine if
you can get paid for them. But there are other problems.
Getting Paid
Importantly, health and social care budgets have tended to act as substitutes for each
other. Inadequate care results in hospital admissions picked up by the health budget
whilst inadequate or incomplete treatment or rehabilitation results in a higher need for
social care. This can drive inappropriate behaviours or more probably inadequate
awareness. It also confuses us about who pays and tends to emphasise the large
monopoly procurement status of the NHS.
In aiming at the public sector market, our options for payment are limited. Budgets
are controlled by government and tend to be somewhat arbitrary. There is little scope
for quality improvement or Rolls Royce solutions.
In practice, the health budget is larger and malleable and has attracted most attention.
Even technologies which seek primarily to support better management of care have
been aimed at the health budget, based on their potential to reduce crisis admissions to
hospital. However, the health budget is not an easy target. It has very high evidential
requirements which are hard for businesses to meet, particularly with new
technologies, potentially requiring years of costly trials. Where these trials have been
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 53
facilitated by large scale implementation projects their outcome has not been clear.
What benefits are we measuring?
Even where theoretical cost savings can be demonstrated, there are challenges in the
public sector funded model.
Many of the savings cannot be implemented because of irreducable spare
capacity, therefore the technology is not affordable.
Where Savings can be realised it is likely that priming funding will be
required before the savings occur, therefore the technology is not affordable
unless accompanied by innovative financing.
Technology is often disruptive. Whilst it may make savings or add value, they
may not always match those to which the purchasing organisation is tethered,
for example reducing the number of times a doctor needs to see a patient
through remote monitoring is not particularly attractive if you are paid per
visit. Tariffs mechanisms may often create challenges to even the most
sensible solutions.
Finally, despite 20 odd years of 'business like' financial management and
recognition of spend to save measures, for the public sector an annual budget
is a far stronger driver than through life cost. Which is probably why,
internationally, better progress appears to be being made by those nations who
have at least partially insurance based health and care mechanisms. Insurance
companies recognise the through life cost of a condition, across the whole
pathway, without artificial organisational or temporal constraints.
Expanding the Market
So we have a small segmented market which struggles to implement and pay for
innovative solutions, now we are beginning to understand the problem. Add to this
the fact that the reputation for strong economic growth attributed to ICT is rooted in
its relevance to large numbers of users, its low cost and high value added and with the
benefit of hindsight it all sounds so obvious. Business computers are used throughout
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 54
the world and are basically similar, making them relatively cheap. However, they
have large numbers of features and are highly user customisable making them flexible
so that all of these users can define their own ways of achieving benefits. None of
this seems to be true of assisted living technologies.
So that's all very well with hindsight, what should we do about it. If the current
market isn't big enough how can we grow it? If public funding doesn't suffice, how
do we reposition. One way is to address different values:
Care providers are under great pressure to do more with less, are there
solutions through which technology could help them prioritise, manage and
deliver more efficiently the same or better outcomes? It makes less and less
sense to separately fund the technology and the support response. This also
provides opportunities to address the problems that are really critical to care
providers such as electronic door locks, which allow authorised access for
carers as needed without the trouble of handling keys.
To address private funding we need to provide value of immediate interest to
individuals. Whilst there will be some interest in saving costs to informal
carers, these will mostly relate to quality of support. Delaying decline,
supporting re-ablement or pre-empting care needs preventatively might all be
valuable to self-funders, as might technology which addresses the many non-
clinical challenges of living with chronic disease.
Addressing needs that are common across multiple conditions would address
some of the challenges of multiple pathology associated with an ageing
society. It would also reduce the fragmentation of the market.
Housing associations and other businesses / agencies with frequent encounters
with vulnerable people are beginning to understand that they have a role in
identifying and intervening in declining health of their clients. By capturing
and monitoring interactions between staff and clients, and using the emerging
data effectively, they have a strong role in early assessment, particularly
amongst the harder to reach.
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 55
Addressing the Private Market
Private funding is a potentially huge source of additional funding. Regardless of the
approach, working in a private market is likely to involve providing a service rather
than simply technologies. Some technology businesses are exploring these markets
but for the most part prefer to remain b2b, interacting with a range of integrators and
intermediaries who will deliver outcomes.
Accessing private funding also requires the development of a new market and of
market places. How will people access advice, guidance, selection support? How
will they become aware of the benefits of technology, which requires the technology
to be visible in society, which will benefit from reduced stigmatisation and more
attractive devices?
Who will be the target of marketing for these tools? Our work indicates that those
with few care needs like the idea of technology which will delay loss of independence
and that those who could afford it would be willing to pay. However, it is equally
clear that as care needs increase many individuals would rather reduce activity than
employ even technological assistance and those with care needs are often concerned
that technology will replace rather than enhance existing human support. A careful
balance of marketing to those with a need for support, their informal carers, industry
care providers and commissioners further emphasises the need to improve
understanding of the value provided by technologies and who they are provided to.
This cannot be achieved through a 'village' of specialist SME equipment providers. It
requires a new understanding of the industry to include integrators who will take
financial risk and deliver outcomes, and infrastructure and service providers who will
support and maintain capabilities. There will be new roles and new skills needed.
Technologists will need a better understanding of care and care workers of
technology.
Above all, there is a need to understand that these are not separate and independent
markets. Private funders may initially engage with the market as consumers but will
transition towards greater needs of physical and clinical support. Even those who age
healthily will eventually lose capability and require help with activities of daily living.
Those who self-fund care initially may eventually transition to public support.
Different marketing approaches are needed for solutions along this spectrum but
SALT Final Report – Sustainable Business Models for Assisted Living Technologies and Services
Page | 56
ultimately they need to be understood as a continuum of care support if their value is
to be understood.
The Value of Change
A big Problem for the project has been to understand a health and care system
undergoing massive change. If it is a problem for an academic project well linked to
health, care and the industry, little surprise that businesses struggle to find their way
in, and many of those that do, even well-known brands quickly leave again.
The Care Act will introduce yet more change. However it enshrines in law
requirements for health and social care to work together and for local authorities to
provide support for all citizens to maximise their health and independence regardless
of whether it provides them with statutory care. These new requirements must surely
provide new opportunities for more aligned solutions and a mixed public private
market.