designing robots in the wild
TRANSCRIPT
Designing Robots in the Wild:
In situ PrototypeEvaluation for a Break Management Robot
UX Prototyping
2012198039 IID Jae Yeon Ju
Table of Contents
Introduction
HRI: Society and Technology
Case Study: a Break Management Robot
Design Steps
Findings
Conclusion
Critique
Introduction
HRI: Human-Robot Interaction
Robots need social or cultural aspects to understand behaviors of users or environments.
Society and Technology
Social Factors
Technological
Factors
Affect design and use
Consequences for social organizations, beliefs, and practices
Case Study: a Break Management Robot
Motivation: the need to take regular breaks during the workday for health
Remind people to take a break
Objects:
Identify the right design characteristic for managing break times
Explore the dynamics of HRI in human environments
Design Steps
Context Exploration EmbodimentSocial
Interaction
• Explore/ Research about
taking breaks
• Initial Prototype
• Virtual vs. Physical
Prototypes
• Examine people’s
perception of the robot
and effectiveness
Step 1: Context Exploration
Prototype design: ‘use scenario’ using Arduino
Users prefer creature-like in form, and minimalist design cues
Focus group: users want for small footprint and no noise
Step 2: Embodiment
Validate the need for an embodied robotic technology with social understanding
Virtual Robot vs. Physical Robot
Reports of users:
Preferred Physical Robots
Want more interactivity and personalization
Step 3: Social Interaction
Constructing Robotic Sociality
Two types of design: Simple Alarm vs. Social Behaviors
Simple Alarm Social Behaviors
Self Sufficient
: Not many diversity of
actions/feedbacks from robots
Many Elements
: Need more engagement of users
Step 3: Social Interaction
Simple Alarm Social Behaviors
How to Turn On Tapping Petting
Frequency of Alarm Every 40 minsGets smaller as time
goes by
How to take a breakUse RFID Card
(looks like playcard)
Feed “fruit” to the
robot
Alarming Vibration ConstantDance gets more
vigorous
Findings
Robot Type:
Less people used the Simple Alarm Robot those who used Simple Alarm more tended to ignore the alarms
More people used the Social Behavioral Robot
Work Environment:
Users who work with clients: higher level of ignoring alarms
Users who work without clients: higher level of responding to the alarms
Effects of the Robot’s Social Interactivity
Social Behavior Robots
Naming the robots – treat them as living beings
Personalized – accessorizing with a scarf or sunglasses
Increase social interactions with colleagues
Being out of the office more
Sharing experiences of robots
Conclusion
Lessons:
Generalizable within HRI in other situations/ environments
Increasing availability of physical prototyping platforms- Arduino
Explore various design factors: social and technological elements
Evaluate multiple design alternatives
Critique
Before reading the article, I did not know the difference between computer based
technologies and socially assistive robotics
Learned the importance of social features of robots
Interesting process of design
Various tryouts of prototypes based on each step’s feedback