designing cornerstone tasks to anchor the · pdf filedesigning cornerstone tasks to anchor the...
TRANSCRIPT
Designing Cornerstone Tasks to Anchor the Curriculum
presented by
Jay McTigheEducational Consultant phone: (410) 531-1610
e-mail: [email protected]: jaymctighe.com
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 2
Stage 2 – Assessment Evidence
Stage 1 – Desired Results
Stage 3 – Learning Plan
What “real-world” tasks will reveal students’ under-standing and proficiency? What transfer performan-ces should students be able to do well if they have met this standard?
What should students come to understand if they really learn this content well?
What should students eventually be able to do on their own if they can meet the Standard?
What important ques-tions are raised by this content?What essential ques-tions will guide inquiry into it?
What instruction is needed to equip students to meet this standard?What learning experiences will help learners acquire the knowldge and skills, make meaning of the important ideas and equip them to transfer their learning?
What evidence of learning is called for by the standard (and its indicators)?What assessments are needed?
Working with Standards using UbD
What big ideas and transfer goals are embedded in this Standard?
What factual knowledge must students acquire to meet the Standard?
What specific skills are stated or implied in the Standard? What proficiencies must students attain to meet the Standard?
What Standard(s) will the unit focus on? Given your reasons for teaching the unit, which Standard(s) are most relevant?
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 3
Prog
ram
sC
ours
esU
nits
Mathe-matics
ScienceArts History World Languages
P. E./Health
TechnologyEd.
Language Arts
Mission and Transfer Goals
Content Standards
Overarching Understandings
Course 6
Course 1Course 2Course 3
Course 4Course 5
Course 12
Course 7Course 8Course 9
Course 10Course 11
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6
Mapping a Coherent Curriculum:The Big Picture
U Q
T OE
Understandings
CornerstoneAssessments
Essential Questions
CornerstoneAssessments
OverarchingEssential Questions
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 4
Students presented with vast amounts of content knowledge that is not organized into meaningful patterns are likely to forget what they have learned and to be unable to apply the knowledge to new problems or unfamiliar contexts (Haidar, 1997). Curriculum for understanding provides ample opportunity for students to apply their knowledge in a variety of contexts and conditions. This helps them transfer their learning to new situations and better prepares them for future learning (Bransford and Schwartz, 2000). Providing students with frequent opportunities to apply what they learn in multiple contexts requires a reallocation of instructional time. Allow-ing time for in-depth learning means decisions must be made about what knowledge is of most worth. For this reason, the curriculum needs to specify clearly the appropriate balance between breadth and depth of coverage in terms of student learning outcomes.
-- Committee on Programs for Advanced Study of Mathematics and Science in American High Schools
The Common Core State Standards in Mathematics“…the mathematics curriculum in the United States must become substantially more focused and coherent in order to improve mathematics achievement .... To deliver on the promise of common standards, the stan-dards must address the problem of a curriculum that is a mile wide and an inch deep. That is, what and how students are taught should reflect not only the topics that fall within a certain academic discipline, but also the key ideas that determine how knowledge is organized and generated within that discipline. This implies that ‘to be coherent,’ a set of content standards must evolve from particulars… to deeper structures inherent in the discipline.” -- Common Core Mathematics Standards, p. 2The (Draft) Common Core State Standards in Science“The framework focuses on a limited number of core ideas in science and engineering both within and across the disciplines. The committee made this choice in order to avoid shallow coverage of a large number of top-ics and to allow more time for teachers and students to explore each idea in greater depth. Reduction of the sheer sum of details to be mastered is intended to give time for students to engage in scientific investigations and argumentation and to achieve depth of understanding of the core ideas presented. Delimiting what is to be learned about each core idea within each grade band also helps clarify what is most important to spend time on, and avoid the proliferation of detail to be learned with no conceptual grounding. -- Common Core Science Standards (draft), p. I-4
Course Revisions to Advanced Placement (AP) Courses“The revised AP Biology course addresses this challenge by shifting from a traditional “content coverage” model of instruction to one that focuses on enduring, conceptual understandings and the content that supports them. This approach will enable students to spend less time on factual recall and more time on inquiry-based learning of essential concepts, and will help them develop the reasoning skills necessary to engage in the sci-ence practices...”“The AP World History Curriculum… is organized around key concepts and core themes, along with four Historical Thinking Skills:. 1. Crafting Historical Arguments from Historical Evidence 2. Chronological Reasoning 3. Comparison and Contextualization 4. Historical Interpretation and Synthesis”
Noteworthy Trends
-- The College Board
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 5
English Language Arts Standards College and Career Readiness
Anchor Standards for Reading
Key Ideas and Details1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical infer-ences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support con-clusions drawn from the text.2. Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summa-rize the key supporting details and ideas.3. Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text.
Craft and Structure4. Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining tech-nical, connotative, and figurative meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone.5. Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of the text (e.g., a section, chapter, scene, or stanza) relate to each other and the whole.6. Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas7. Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words.18. Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the va-lidity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.9. Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take.
Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity10. Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 6
English Language Arts Standards College and Career Readiness
Anchor Standards for Writing
Text Types and Purposes1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.2. Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.3. Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, well-chosen details, and well-structured event sequences.
Production and Distribution of Writing4. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.5. Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach.6. Use technology, including the Internet, to produce and publish writing and to inter-act and collaborate with others.
Research to Build and Present Knowledge7. Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused ques-tions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.8. Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism.9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
Range of Writing10. Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revi-sion) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences.
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 7
Crosscutting Scientific and Engineering Concepts
1. Patterns – Observed patterns of forms and events guide organization and classifica-tion, and they prompt questions about relationships and the factors that influence them.2. Cause and Effect – Mechanism and explanation. Events have causes, sometimes simple, sometimes multifaceted. A major activity of science is investigating and ex-plaining causal relationships and the mechanisms by which they are mediated. Such mechanisms can then be tested across given contexts and used to predict and explain events in new contexts.3. Scale, Proportion, and Quantity – In considering phenomena, it is critical to rec-ognize what is relevant at different measures of size, time, and energy and to recognize how changes in scale, proportion, or quantity affect a system’s structure or perfor-mance.4. Systems and System Models – Defining the system under study – specifying its boundaries and making explicit a model of that system – provides tools for understand-ing and testing ideas that are applicable throughout science and engineering.5. Energy and Matter – Flows, cycles, and conservation. Tracking fluxes of energy and matter into, out of, and within systems helps one understand the systems’ possibili-ties and limitations.6. Structure and Function – The way in which an object or living thing is shaped and its substructure determine many of its properties and functions. 7. Stability and Change – For natural and built systems alike, conditions of stability and determinants of rates of change or evolution of the system are critical elements of study.
Practices for K-12 Science Classrooms
1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering)2. Developing and using models3. Planning and carrying out investigations4. Analyzing and interpreting data5. Using mathematics, information and computer technology, & computational thinking6. Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering)7. Engaging in argument from evidence8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information
Key Conceptual Understandings and Processes in the Science Standards
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 8
The Partnership for 21st Century Skills has developed a vision for 21st century student success in the new global economy. The Partnership created the Framework for 21st Century Learning, which describes the skills, knowledge and expertise students must master to succeed in work and life. Only when a school or district combines the framework with 21st century professional development, as-sessments and standards, can the American public be sure that high school graduates are prepared to thrive in today’s global economy.
21st century skills represent the necessary student outcomes for the 21st century, i.e. students need to obtain Learning and Innovation Skills (creativity and innovation, critical thinking and problem solving, etc.), Information, Media and Technology Skills, Core Subjects and 21st Century Themes (global awareness, financial literacy, etc.) and Life and Career Skills (initiative and self-direction, among others).
Learning and Innovation Skills Learning and innovation skills are what separate students who are prepared for increasingly complex life and work environments in the 21st century and those who are not. They include:
• Creativity and Innovation • Critical Thinking and Problem Solving • Communication and Collaboration
Information, Media and Technology SkillsPeople in the 21st century live in a technology and media-driven environment, marked by access to an abundance of information, rapid changes in technology tools and the ability to collaborate and make individual contributions on an unprecedented scale. To be effective in the 21st century, citizens and workers must be able to exhibit a range of functional and critical thinking skills, such as:
• Information Literacy • Media Literacy • ICT (Information, Communications and Technology) Literacy
Life and Career SkillsToday’s life and work environments require far more than thinking skills and content knowledge. The ability to navigate the complex life and work environments in the globally competitive informa-tion age requires students to pay rigorous attention to developing adequate life and career skills, such as:
• Flexibility and Adaptability • Initiative and Self-Direction • Social and Cross-Cultural Skills • Productivity and Accountability • Leadership and Responsibility
The Partnership for 21st Century Skills
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 9
TRANSFER GOALS
Definition Transfer Goals highlight the effective uses of understanding, knowledge, and skill we seek in the long run; i.e., what we want students to be able to do when they confront new challenges – both in and outside of school, beyond the current lessons and unit.
There are a small number of overarching transfer goals in each subject area. For ex-ample, a long-term aim in mathematics is for students to be able to solve any problem on their own. A long-term transfer goal in history is for students to apply the lessons of history to contemporary issues and to become more pro-active citizens based on their understanding. In world languages we want learners to be able to communicate effec-tively in the target language, in different situations. In every case, the ability to transfer learning manifests itself in not just one setting but varied real-world situations.
Transfer is about independent performance in context. You can only be said to have fully understood if you can apply your learning without someone telling you what to do and when to do it. In the real world, no teacher is there to direct and remind you about which lesson to plug in here or there. Transfer is about intelligently and effectively drawing from your repertoire, independently, to handle new contexts on your own.
PurposeEffective transfer goals… • reflect research on learning from multiple sources – cognitive psychology, neuroscience and studies of student achievement; • resonate with our personal and professional experience in learning and teaching.
Examples Health and Physical Education – Make healthful choices and decisions regarding diet, exercise, stress management, alcohol/drug use. World Languages – Communicate effectively in realistic situations with an understanding of cultural and personal contexts.
See related materials in this packet and online.
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 10
Students will be able to independently use their learning to:
WritingEffectively write in various genre for various audiences in order to Explain (narrative, expository), Entertain (creative),Persuade (persuasive), Help perform a task (technical), andChallenge or Change Things (satirical).
Reading• Read, respond to text in various genres (literature, non-fiction, technical) for various purposes (entertainment, to be informed, to perform a task).• Comprehend text by getting the main idea (the “gist”), interpreting (“between the lines”), critically appraising, and making personal connections.
Mathematics• Recognize and solve never-seen-before, “messy” mathematical problems in which the appropriate solution approach is not obvious.
Health and Physical Education • Make healthful choices and decisions regarding diet, exercise, stress management, alcohol/drug use.
Science • Evaluate scientific claims (e.g., XX brand of paper towels absorbs the most liquid of all the leading brand), and analyze current issues involving science or technology. (e.g., Ethanol is the most cost-effective alternative fuel source.)
History • Apply lessons of the past (patterns of history) to current and future events and issues, and to other historical events. • Critically appraise historical and contemporary claims/decisions.
Performing Arts • Interpret the meaning of works of art. • Create and perform an original work in a selected medium to express ideas and/or to evoke mood and emotion.
World LanguagesEffectively communicate with varied audiences and for varied pur-poses while displaying appropriate cultural understanding.
In this unit...
Long Term Transfer Goals
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 11
CORNERSTONE TASKS
Definition Cornerstone tasks are curriculum-embedded that are intended to engage students in applying their knowledge and skills in an authentic and relevant context. Like a cor-nerstone anchors a building, these tasks are meant to anchor the curriculum around the most important performances that we want learners to be able to do (on their own) with acquired content knowledge and skills. They honor the intent of the Standards, within and across subject areas, instead of emphasizing only the tested (a.k.a. “eli-gible”) content.
PurposeEffective cornerstone tasks: • are curriculum embedded (as opposed to externally imposed); • recur over the grades, becoming increasingly sophisticated over time; • establish authentic contexts for performance; • assess understanding and transfer via genuine performance; • integrate 21st century skills (e.g., critical thinking, technology use, teamwork) with subject area content; • can be used as rich learning activities and/or assessments; • evaluate performance with established rubrics; • engage students in meaningful learning while encouraging the best teaching; • provide content for a student’s portfolio (so that they graduate with a resume of demonstrated accomplishments rather than simply a transcript of courses taken).
ExampleAfter investigating a current political issue, write a letter to a public policy maker regarding the official’s position on a current political issue. Your letter should pres-ent your opinion and attempt to persuade the public policy maker to vote accordingly. This public policy maker is opposed to the student’s position. (Students will be pro-vided documentation of public policy maker’s position and background information. Students will be given a choice of several situations if they do not propose an issue.)
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 12
[Science]
Upper Elementary/Middle School ThePooperScooperKittyLitterCompanyclaimsthattheirlitteris40%moreabsorbentthanotherbrands. YouareaConsumerAdvocatesresearcherwhohasbeenaskedtoevaluatetheirclaim.Developaplanforconductingtheinvestigation.Yourplanshouldbespecificenoughsothatthelabinvestigatorscouldfollowittoevaluatetheclaim.
High School Designaninvestigationtoanswerthequestion,How much does it cost to take a shower? Identifythevariablesthatmustbeconsideredandthendevelopaplanforcon-ductingtheinvestigation.Yourplanshouldbespecificenoughsothatotherinvestiga-torscouldfollowitandanswerthequestion.
[Social Studies]
Upper Elementary/Middle School Youhaveanideathatyoubelievewillmakeyourschoolbetter,andyouwanttoconvinceschoolleadersthattheyshouldactonyouridea.Identifyyouraudience(e.g.,principal,PTSABoard,students)and: •Describeyouridea. •Explainwhy&howitwillimprovetheschool. •Developaplanforactingonyouridea. Yourideaandplancanbecommunicatedtoyourtargetaudienceinaletter,e-mail,orpresentation.
High School Afterinvestigatingacurrentpoliticalissue,prepareapositionpaper/presenta-tionforapublicpolicymaker(e.g.,Congressperson)orgroup(e.g.,schoolboard,legislativecommittee).Assumethatthepolicymakerorgroupisopposedtoyourposition.Yourpositionstatementshouldprovideananalysisoftheissue,consideroptions,presentyourposition,rebutopposingpositions,andattempttopersuadethepublicpolicymakerorgrouptovoteaccordingly. Yourpositioncanbecommunicatedinawrittenreport,viaawebblog,ordeliveredasapresentation.
Examples of Recurring Cornerstone Tasks
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 13
Tour Director [World Languages - secondary]
Level I – You are required to take a “trip” around the school (or town, or mall). Incorporate the following vocabulary: directions (left, right, near, far, next to, etc.), places (classrooms, cafeteria, gym, library, labs, churches, police and fire stations, schools, restaurants, stores) and transportation (bus, taxi, train, car, bike, stairs, esca-lators, elevators). Keep sentences simple and narrate – in the target language – your “trip” to five places using a variety of directions (and transportation).
Level II – You are to plan a trip to the capital of _________. You will be in that city for only two days. Keep a diary – in the target language – and tell which places you have visited and what you have seen. Be sure that these places are close enough to each other to be visited in a two-day period and are open on the days you will be there.
Level III – You have been selected by the members of the World Languages Club to plan their annual trip to two of the countries whose languages are studied in your school. You must plan an itinerary that will include at least five places of cultural and historic importance. You must include at lease one site/activity that might be of particular in-terest to teenagers (e.g. Euro-Disney, a bull fight or a soccer game). Use public trans-portation wherever possible. Create a brochure to advertise the trip and be prepared to give a presentation to those students who may be interested in traveling with you.
Level IV – You are traveling in the foreign country of your choice on business. Be prepared to role play with, a partner(s), making reservations with the airline and the hotel; narrate/role play: arriving and checking in at the airport in the U.S., going through customs upon landing, and getting to the hotel by taxi. Since you will have some limited time when you are not involved in your business dealings, you will want to make some brief cultural excursions and will need to get information from and make arrangements with the concierge in your hotel.
Source: World languages Department – Woodbury High School, Woodbury, NJ
Cornerstone Tasks for World Languagesexamples
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 14
G
RA
DE
Exp
osit
ory
P
ersu
asiv
e
Lit
erar
y A
naly
sis
C
reat
ive/
Exp
ress
ive
G
rade
6
R
esea
rch
Po
sitio
n
Lite
rary
ess
ay o
n
Ori
gina
l myt
h
re
port
pape
r
se
tting
or
confl
ict
G
rade
7
A
utob
iogr
aphy
Po
licy
L
itera
ry e
ssay
on
Pe
rson
a
eval
uatio
n
char
acte
r
w
ritin
g
G
rade
8
R
esea
rch
Pr
oble
m/
L
itera
ry e
ssay
on
N
arra
tive
repo
rt
so
lutio
n es
say
sym
bolis
m
fictio
n
G
rade
9
C
ause
/eff
ect
Edi
tori
al
A
naly
sis
of m
ultip
le
Poet
ry
es
say
lit
erar
y el
emen
ts
G
rade
10
R
esea
rch
So
cial
issu
e
Cri
tical
Len
s
His
tori
cal
repo
rt
es
say
essa
y
Pers
ona
G
rade
11
D
efini
tion
A
rgum
enta
tive
Com
para
tive
genr
e
Paro
dy/s
atir
e
es
say
essa
y
es
say
G
rade
12
R
esea
rch
Po
sitio
n
Res
pons
e to
Iron
y
pa
per
pape
r
lit
erar
y cr
itics
m
Cor
ners
tone
Ass
essm
ents
in W
riti
ng (
6-12
) G
RE
EC
E C
EN
TR
AL
SC
HO
OL
DIS
TR
ICT,
NY
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 15
Understanding:
Part 1 – How would you define “understanding”? What does it mean to “really understand” or “get it”?
Indicators of UnderstandingIndicators of Knowledge without Understanding
Part 2 - What are concrete indicators of really understanding something (as apposed to merely knowing important facts about it)? What can the person with understanding do that the person with only knowledge – even lots of knowledge – cannot do?
What is Understanding?
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 16
The facets of understanding provide indicators of understanding and thus can be used to select or develop assessments. If someone really understands something, they can...
Explanation
Inte
rpre
tatio
n
Pers
pect
ive
Self-Knowledge
The Facets of Understanding
Empathy
• Explain it in their own words.•Represent it in a different form.
•Teach it to someone else.•Make and support an
inference.
• Make meaning from a text or data set.• See and describe patterns.• Make new connections.
• Use their learning effectivelyin a new situation.• Transfer.
• Get “inside” another person’s feelings and world view.• Recognize merit in the odd, unorthodox, or unfamiliar.
• Realize their strengths and weaknesses.
• Recognize the limits of their own understanding.
• Reflect on their learning and actions.
• Recognize different points of view. • See the “big picture.”• Take a critical stance.
Facets of Understanding
Application
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 17
Evaluate historical claims or interpretations based on:o Primary source evidenceo Secondary source evidenceo Personal opinion
Critically analyze current events/ issues o Summarize/ compare key pointso Analyze causes and effectso Identify points of view and potential biaso Debate possible courses of action
Make predictions for current or future events or issues based on understanding of historical patterns.
Make informed decisions using critical thinking and understanding of historical patterns.
Act as a responsible citizen in a democracy (e.g., stay informed, study issues, participate in com-munity events, vote).
Other: ___________________________________
_________________________________________
Creating Cornerstone Assessments Tasks:Idea Starters in Social Studies
Task Ideas
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 18
Prac
tice
Sta
ndar
ds
MAT
H G
R 3
Cont
ent
Stan
dard
s
1 M
ake
sens
e of
pr
oble
ms
and
pers
e-ve
re i
n so
lv-
ing
them
.
2 Re
ason
ab
stra
ctly
an
d qu
anti
-ta
tive
ly.
3 Co
nstr
uct
viab
le a
rgu-
men
ts a
nd
crit
ique
the
re
ason
ing
of
othe
rs.
4 M
odel
w
ith
mat
h-em
atic
s.
5 U
se a
ppro
-pr
iate
too
ls
stra
tegi
-ca
lly.
6 A
tten
d to
pr
ecis
ion.
7 Lo
ok f
or
and
mak
e us
e of
str
uc-
ture
.
8 Lo
ok f
or
and
expr
ess
regu
lari
ty
in r
epea
ted
reas
onin
g.
Repr
esen
t and
solv
e pr
oble
ms i
n-vo
lvin
g m
ultip
licat
ion
and
divi
sion
.Un
ders
tand
pro
pert
ies o
f mul
tipli-
catio
n an
d th
e re
latio
nshi
p be
-tw
een
mul
tiplic
atio
n an
d di
visi
on.
Mul
tiply
and
div
ide
with
in 1
00.
Solv
e pr
oble
ms i
nvol
ving
the
four
op
erat
ions
, and
iden
tify
and
ex-
plai
n pa
tter
ns in
ari
thm
etic
.An
alyz
e th
e st
ruct
ure
of te
xts,
incl
udin
g ho
w sp
ecifi
c sen
tenc
es,
para
grap
hs, a
nd la
rger
por
tions
of
the
text
(e.g
., a se
ctio
n, ch
apte
r, sc
ene,
or s
tanz
a) re
late
to e
ach
othe
r and
the
who
le.
Use
plac
e va
lue
unde
rsta
ndin
g an
d pr
oper
ties o
f ope
ratio
ns to
per
-fo
rm m
ulti-
digi
t ari
thm
etic
.De
velo
p un
ders
tand
ing
of fr
actio
ns
as n
umbe
rs.
Solv
e pr
oble
ms i
nvol
ving
mea
sure
-m
ent a
nd e
stim
atio
n of
inte
rval
s of
time,
liqu
id v
olum
es, a
nd m
asse
s of
obj
ects
.Re
pres
ent a
nd in
terp
ret d
ata.
Geom
etri
c mea
sure
men
t: un
der-
stan
d co
ncep
ts o
f are
a an
d re
late
ar
ea to
mul
tiplic
atio
n an
d to
ad-
ditio
n.Ge
omet
ric m
easu
rem
ent:
reco
g-ni
ze p
erim
eter
as a
n at
trib
ute
of p
lane
figu
res a
nd d
istin
guis
h be
twee
n lin
ear a
nd a
rea
mea
sure
s.Re
ason
with
shap
es a
nd th
eir
attr
ibut
es.
Mat
rix
Met
hod
-- M
athe
mat
ics
Com
mon
Cor
e St
anda
rds
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 19
Com
mon
Cor
e St
ate
Stan
dard
s
Mat
hem
atic
s
Repr
esen
t and
solv
e pr
oble
ms i
n-vo
lvin
g m
ultip
licat
ion
and
divi
sion
.Un
ders
tand
pro
pert
ies o
f mul
tipli-
catio
n an
d th
e re
latio
nshi
p be
-tw
een
mul
tiplic
atio
n an
d di
visi
on.
Mul
tiply
and
div
ide
with
in 1
00.
Solv
e pr
oble
ms i
nvol
ving
the
four
op
erat
ions
, and
iden
tify
and
ex-
plai
n pa
tter
ns in
ari
thm
etic
.Us
e pl
ace
valu
e un
ders
tand
ing
an
d pr
oper
ties o
f ope
ratio
ns to
pe
rfor
m m
ulti-
digi
t ari
thm
etic
.De
velo
p un
ders
tand
ing
of fr
actio
ns
as n
umbe
rs.
Solv
e pr
oble
ms i
nvol
ving
mea
sure
-m
ent a
nd e
stim
atio
n of
inte
rval
s of
time,
liqu
id v
olum
es, a
nd m
asse
s of
obj
ects
.Re
pres
ent a
nd in
terp
ret d
ata.
Geom
etri
c mea
sure
men
t: un
der-
stan
d co
ncep
ts o
f are
a an
d re
late
ar
ea to
mul
tiplic
atio
n an
d to
addi
tion.
Geom
etri
c mea
sure
men
t:
reco
gniz
e pe
rim
eter
as a
n at
trib
ute
of p
lane
figu
res a
nd d
istin
guis
h be
twee
n lin
ear a
nd a
rea
mea
sure
s.Re
ason
with
shap
es a
nd th
eir
attr
ibut
es.
Stan
dard
s fo
r M
athe
mat
ical
Pra
ctic
e:
o 1
. Mak
e se
nse
of p
robl
ems
and
pers
ever
e in
sol
ving
them
.o
2.
Rea
son
abst
ract
ly a
nd q
uant
itativ
ely.
o
3. C
onst
ruct
via
ble
argu
men
ts a
nd c
ritiq
ue th
e re
ason
ing
of o
ther
s.o
4.
Mod
el w
ith m
athe
mat
ics.
o
5. U
se a
ppro
pria
te to
ols
stra
tegi
cally
.o
6.
Atte
nd to
pre
cisi
on.
o
7. L
ook
for
and
mak
e us
e of
str
uctu
re.
o
8. L
ook
for
and
expr
ess
regu
lari
ty in
rep
eate
d re
ason
ing.
Colle
ct,
orga
nize
, di
spla
y da
ta o
n re
al-w
orld
phe
nom
ena;
ana
lyze
dat
a to
id
enti
fy p
atte
rns;
use
pat
tern
s to
mak
e pr
edic
iton
s; c
omm
unic
ate
clea
rly
usin
g m
athe
mat
ical
ter
min
olog
y.
Ever
y se
ven
wee
ks s
tude
nts
wor
k in
gro
ups
of f
our
to m
easu
re t
he h
eigh
t of
eac
h ot
her
usin
g ta
pe m
easu
res
affix
ed t
o th
e cl
assr
oom
wal
ls.
By m
id-M
ay,
the
clas
s ha
s ob
tain
ed s
ix
heig
ht m
easu
res.
The
n, s
tude
nts
crea
te a
sim
ple
grap
h (h
eigh
t in
inch
es p
lott
ed a
gain
st
the
mon
ths
of t
he s
choo
l yea
r) a
nd p
lot
the
data
. U
sing
rul
ers,
the
y co
nnec
t th
e do
ts t
o se
e “r
ise
over
run
” (a
vis
ual r
epre
sent
atio
n of
the
ir g
row
th o
ver
tim
e).
The
char
t pa
pers
ar
e po
sted
thr
ough
out
the
room
, an
d th
e st
uden
ts c
ircu
late
in a
gal
lery
wal
k to
vie
w t
he
chan
ges
in h
eigh
ts o
f th
e va
riou
s gr
oups
. St
uden
ts t
hen
anal
yze
the
data
to
answ
er g
uidi
ng q
uest
ions
: “I
n w
hat
mon
ths
did
we
grow
th
e m
ost
this
yea
r?”
“Is
ther
e a
diff
eren
ce b
etw
een
how
boy
s an
d gi
rls
have
gro
wn
in
seco
nd g
rade
?” “
How
doe
s ou
r cl
ass
grow
th c
ompa
re t
o th
at in
the
oth
er s
econ
d gr
ades
?”
“Wha
t ca
n w
e pr
edic
t fo
r ne
xt y
ear’
s se
cond
gra
ders
abo
ut h
ow t
hey
will
gro
w b
ased
on
our
data
?” S
tude
nts
are
then
wor
k in
the
ir g
roup
s to
dev
elop
a p
rese
ntat
ion
for
the
curr
ent
2nd
grad
ers
to p
redi
ct h
ow m
uch
they
will
gro
w in
3rd
gra
de.
4 4
4
Gra
de 3
:
o o o o o o o o o o o4
Con
tent
Sta
ndar
ds
TR
AN
SFE
R G
OA
L(S
)
Stu
dent
s w
ill b
e ab
le to
inde
pend
entl
y us
e th
eir
lear
ning
to...
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E T
ASK
Ide
as
Unp
acki
ng S
tand
ards
– “
Mat
rix”
Met
hod
Pro
cess
Sta
ndar
ds
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 20
A
Fra
mew
ork
for
K-1
2 Sc
ienc
e
Edu
cati
on:
Pra
ctic
es, C
ross
cutt
ing
Con
cept
s, a
nd C
ore
Idea
s Sc
ienc
e
Hig
h Sc
hool
Bio
logy
Cor
e C
once
pts
of S
cien
ce a
nd E
ngin
eeri
ng
1
. Pat
tern
s. O
bser
ved
patte
rns
of f
orm
s an
d ev
ents
gu
ide
orga
niza
tion
and
clas
sific
atio
n, a
nd th
ey p
rom
pt
ques
tions
abo
ut r
elat
ions
hips
and
the
fact
ors
that
influ
-en
ce th
em.
2. C
ause
and
eff
ect.
Mec
hani
sm a
nd e
xpla
na-
tion.
Eve
nts
have
cau
ses,
som
etim
es s
impl
e, s
omet
imes
m
ultif
acet
ed. A
maj
or a
ctiv
ity o
f sc
ienc
e is
inve
stig
atin
g an
d ex
plai
ning
cau
sal r
elat
ions
hips
and
the
mec
hani
sms
by w
hich
they
are
med
iate
d. S
uch
mec
hani
sms
can
then
be
test
ed a
cros
s gi
ven
cont
exts
and
use
d to
pre
dict
and
ex
plai
n ev
ents
in n
ew c
onte
xts.
3. S
cale
, pro
port
ion,
and
qua
ntit
y. I
n co
nsid
erin
g ph
enom
ena,
it is
cri
tical
to r
ecog
nize
wha
t is
rele
vant
at
dif
fere
nt m
easu
res
of s
ize,
tim
e, a
nd e
nerg
y an
d to
re
cogn
ize
how
cha
nges
in s
cale
, pro
port
ion,
or
quan
tity
affe
ct a
sys
tem
’s s
truc
ture
or
perf
orm
ance
.
4
. Sys
tem
s an
d sy
stem
mod
els.
Defi
ning
the
syst
em u
nder
stu
dy –
spe
cify
ing
its b
ound
arie
s an
d m
akin
g ex
plic
it a
mod
el o
f th
at s
yste
m –
pro
vide
s to
ols
for
unde
rsta
ndin
g an
d te
stin
g id
eas
that
are
app
licab
le
thro
ugho
ut s
cien
ce a
nd e
ngin
eeri
ng.
5. E
nerg
y an
d m
atte
r. F
low
s, c
ycle
s, a
nd c
on-
serv
atio
n. T
rack
ing
fluxe
s of
ene
rgy
and
mat
ter
into
, ou
t of,
and
with
in s
yste
ms
help
s on
e un
ders
tand
the
syst
ems’
pos
sibi
litie
s an
d lim
itatio
ns.
6. S
truc
ture
and
fun
ctio
n. T
he w
ay in
whi
ch
an o
bjec
t or
livin
g th
ing
is s
hape
d an
d its
sub
stru
ctur
e de
term
ine
man
y of
its
prop
ertie
s an
d fu
nctio
ns.
7. S
tabi
lity
and
chan
ge. F
or n
atur
al a
nd b
uilt
syst
ems
alik
e, c
ondi
tions
of
stab
ility
and
det
erm
inan
ts
of r
ates
of
chan
ge o
r ev
olut
ion
of th
e sy
stem
are
cri
tical
el
emen
ts o
f st
udy.
o
1. A
skin
g qu
estio
ns (
for
scie
nce)
and
defi
ning
pro
blem
s (f
or e
ngin
eeri
ng)
o
2. D
evel
opin
g an
d us
ing
mod
els
o
3. P
lann
ing
and
carr
ying
out
inve
stig
atio
nso
4.
Ana
lyzi
ng a
nd in
terp
retin
g da
tao
5.
Usi
ng m
athe
mat
ics,
info
rmat
ion
and
com
pute
r te
chno
logy
, and
com
puta
tiona
l thi
nkin
go
6.
Con
stru
ctin
g ex
plan
atio
ns (
for
scie
nce)
and
des
igni
ng s
olut
ions
(fo
r en
gine
erin
g)o
7.
Eng
agin
g in
arg
umen
t fro
m e
vide
nce
o
8. O
btai
ning
, eva
luat
ing,
and
com
mun
icat
ing
info
rmat
ion
Des
ign
and
cond
uct
a sc
ient
ific
inve
stig
atio
n an
d co
mm
unic
ate
resu
lts
for
a se
lf-
gene
rate
d hy
poth
esis
.
Task
1 –
How
doe
s ex
erci
se a
ffec
t th
e pu
lse
rate
?
Des
ign
and
cond
uct
an in
vest
igat
ion
that
com
pare
s no
rmal
pul
se r
ate
to c
hang
es c
ause
d by
tw
o
sele
cted
phy
sica
l act
ivit
ies
(e.g
., j
oggi
ng,
swim
min
g, p
ush-
ups,
squ
ats)
for
des
igna
ted
inte
rval
s.
Prep
are
a re
port
incl
udin
g:•
an e
xpla
nati
on o
f ho
meo
stas
is,
oxyg
en/c
arbo
n di
oxid
e fe
edba
ck lo
op,
effe
ct o
f pu
lse
rate
• an
inte
rpre
tati
on o
f th
e re
sult
s
Answ
er t
hese
que
stio
ns in
you
r re
port
– H
ow d
id t
he p
ulse
rat
es d
urin
g ex
erci
se c
ompa
re t
o th
e no
rmal
(re
stin
g) p
ulse
rat
e? H
ow d
o CO
2 an
d O
2 le
vels
eff
ect
the
hear
t ra
te?
How
doe
s th
e he
art
rate
eff
ect
puls
e ra
te?
How
doe
s th
is a
ffec
t ho
meo
stas
is?
Is t
he r
espi
rato
ry r
ate
also
af-
fect
ed?
•
How
can
you
r de
sign
be
impr
oved
?
Task
2 –
Des
ign
and
cons
truc
t a
scie
ntifi
c ex
peri
men
t to
tes
t w
hich
of
four
ant
acid
s w
ould
be
the
mos
t ef
fect
ive
for
neut
raliz
ing
acid
. Pr
epar
e a
(new
s ar
ticl
e, p
odca
st,
Pow
er P
oint
slid
e sh
ow,
Anim
oto
anim
atio
n) t
o co
mm
unic
ate
your
find
ings
to
the
gene
ral p
ublic
.
4 4
*Sou
rce:
pal
s.sr
i.com
Scie
ntifi
c an
d E
ngin
eeri
ng P
ract
ices
:
4 4 4
Con
tent
Sta
ndar
ds
TR
AN
SFE
R G
OA
L(S
)
Stu
dent
s w
ill b
e ab
le to
inde
pend
entl
y us
e th
eir
lear
ning
to...
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E T
ASK
Ide
as
Unp
acki
ng S
tand
ards
– “
Mat
rix”
Met
hod
Pro
cess
Sta
ndar
ds
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 21
Map
ping
Cor
ners
tone
Tas
ks
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
High School Courses
Key
Pro
gram
G
oals
:
1. _
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
_
2. _
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
_
3. _
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
_
4. _
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
_
5. _
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
_
6. _
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
_
7. _
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
_
8.__
____
____
____
_
____
____
____
____
_
21st
Cen
tury
Ski
lls:
a. C
riti
cal/C
reat
ive
Thi
nkin
g
b. P
robl
em S
olvi
ng
c
. Tec
hnol
ogy
Use
d
. Com
mun
icat
ion
e
. Col
labo
rati
on
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 22
Com
preh
ensi
bilit
y
Res
pons
es r
eadi
ly c
ompr
ehen
-si
ble,
req
uiri
ng n
o in
terp
reta
tion
on th
e pa
rt o
f th
e lis
tene
r.
Res
pons
es c
ompr
ehen
sibl
e,
requ
irin
g m
inim
al in
terp
reta
tion
on th
e pa
rt o
f th
e lis
tene
r.
Res
pons
es m
ostly
com
preh
en-
sibl
e, r
equi
ring
inte
rpre
tatio
n on
the
part
of
the
liste
ner.
Res
pons
es b
arel
y co
mpr
ehen
-si
ble.
Flu
ency
Spee
ch c
ontin
uous
with
few
pa
uses
or
stum
blin
g.
Som
e he
sita
tion
but m
anag
es
to c
ontin
ue a
nd c
ompl
ete
thou
ghts
.
Spee
ch c
hopp
y an
d/or
slo
w
with
fre
quen
t pau
ses;
few
or
no in
com
plet
e th
ough
ts.
Spee
ch h
altin
g an
d un
even
w
ith lo
ng p
ause
s or
inco
mpl
ete
thou
ghts
.
Pro
nunc
iati
on
Acc
urat
e pr
onun
ciat
ion
enha
nces
com
mun
icat
ion.
Infr
eque
nt m
ispr
onun
ciat
ions
do
not
inte
rfer
e w
ith
com
mun
icat
ion.
Mis
pron
unci
atio
ns s
omet
imes
in
terf
ere
with
com
mun
icat
ion.
Freq
uent
mis
pron
unci
atio
ns
grea
tly in
terf
ere
with
co
mm
unic
atio
n.
Voc
abul
ary
Ric
h us
e of
voc
abul
ary
enha
nces
com
mun
icat
ion.
Ade
quat
e an
d ac
cura
te u
se
of v
ocab
ular
y fo
r th
is le
vel
enha
nces
com
mun
icat
ion.
Inad
equa
te a
nd/o
r in
accu
rate
us
e of
voc
abul
ary
som
etim
es
inte
rfer
es w
/ com
mun
icat
ion.
Inad
equa
te a
nd/o
r in
accu
rate
us
e of
voc
abul
ary
grea
tly in
-te
rfer
es w
ith c
omm
unic
atio
n.
Lan
guag
e C
ontr
ol
Acc
urat
e co
ntro
l of
basi
c la
ngua
ge s
truc
ture
s.
Gen
eral
ly a
ccur
ate
cont
rol
of b
asic
lang
uage
str
uc-
ture
s.
Em
ergi
ng u
se o
f ba
sic
lang
uage
str
uctu
res.
Inad
equa
te a
nd/o
r in
accu
-ra
te u
se o
f ba
sic
lang
uage
st
ruct
ures
.
4 3 2 1
Com
mon
Ana
lyti
c Sp
eaki
ng R
ubri
c fo
r W
orld
Lan
guag
es
Sour
ce: F
airf
ax C
ount
y, V
A P
ublic
Sch
ools
h
ttp://
ww
w.f
cps.
edu/
DIS
/OH
SIC
S/fo
rlan
g/PA
LS/
rubr
ics/
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 23
Common Analytic Rubric for Persuasive Writing
2/3
/03
S
KIL
L
AR
EA
6
Resp
on
ses
at
this
lev
el:
5
Resp
on
ses
at
this
lev
el:
4
Resp
on
ses
at
this
lev
el:
3
Resp
on
ses
at
this
lev
el:
2
Resp
on
ses
at
this
lev
el:
1
Resp
on
ses
at
this
lev
el:
Mea
nin
g:
the e
xte
nt
to w
hic
h t
he w
riti
ng
exh
ibit
s so
un
d
un
der
stan
din
g,
anal
ysi
s, a
nd
exp
lan
atio
n,
of
the
wri
tin
g t
ask
an
d
tex
t(s)
• c
on
vey
an
accu
rate
an
d i
n-
dep
th u
nd
erst
and
ing
of
the
top
ic,
aud
ien
ce,
an
d p
urp
ose
for
the
wri
tin
g t
ask
• o
ffer
insi
gh
tfu
l an
d t
ho
rou
gh
anal
ysi
s an
d e
xp
lan
ati
on
in
sup
po
rt o
f th
e a
rgu
men
t o
r
po
siti
on
• c
on
vey
an
accu
rate
an
d
com
ple
te u
nd
erst
and
ing
of
the
top
ic,
aud
ien
ce,
an
d
pu
rpo
se f
or
the
wri
tin
g t
ask
• o
ffer
clea
r an
d e
xp
licit
anal
ysi
s an
d e
xp
lan
ati
on
in
sup
po
rt o
f th
e a
rgu
men
t o
r
po
siti
on
• c
on
vey
an
accu
rate
alth
ou
gh
so
mew
hat
basi
c
un
der
stan
din
g o
f th
e t
op
ic,
aud
ien
ce,
and
pu
rpo
se f
or
the
wri
tin
g t
ask
• o
ffer
part
ial
anal
ysi
s an
d
exp
lan
atio
n i
n s
up
po
rt o
f
the
arg
um
ent
or
po
siti
on
• c
on
vey
a p
artl
y a
ccu
rate
un
der
stan
din
g o
f th
e t
op
ic,
aud
ien
ce,
and
pu
rpo
se o
f
the
wri
tin
g t
ask
• o
ffer
lim
ited
an
aly
sis
or
sup
erfi
cial
ex
pla
nati
on
th
at
on
ly p
arti
all
y s
up
po
rt t
he
arg
um
ent
or
po
siti
on
• c
on
vey
a c
on
fuse
d o
r
larg
ely
in
accu
rate
un
der
stan
din
g o
f th
e t
op
ic,
aud
ien
ce,
and
pu
rpo
se f
or
the
wri
tin
g t
ask
• o
ffer
un
clear
an
aly
sis
or
un
war
ran
ted
ex
pla
nati
on
s
that
fai
l to
su
pp
ort
th
e
arg
um
ent
or
po
siti
on
• p
rov
ide n
o e
vid
ence
of
un
der
stan
din
g t
he
wri
tin
g t
ask
or
top
ic
• m
ake
inco
here
nt
exp
lan
atio
ns
that
do
no
t su
pp
ort
th
e
arg
um
ent
or
po
siti
on
Dev
elo
pm
ent:
th
e
exte
nt
to w
hic
h i
deas
are
elab
ora
ted
usi
ng
speci
fic
and
rel
evan
t
det
ail
s an
d/o
r
evid
ence
to
su
pp
ort
the
thesi
s
• s
up
po
rt t
he p
osi
tio
n c
learl
y
and
fu
lly
wit
h a
rgu
men
ts t
hat
effe
ctiv
ely
in
teg
rate
an
d
elab
ora
te o
n s
pec
ific
id
eas
and
tex
tual
ev
iden
ce
fro
m a
var
iety
of
sou
rces
• e
ffect
ivel
y a
nti
cip
ate
and
con
vin
cin
gly
refu
te o
pp
osi
ng
vie
w p
oin
ts
• s
up
po
rt t
he p
osi
tio
n
clea
rly
an
d c
on
sist
entl
y
wit
h a
rgu
men
ts t
hat
inco
rpo
rate
an
d e
xp
lain
idea
s an
d s
peci
fic
tex
tual
evid
ence
fro
m a
vari
ety
of
sou
rces
• a
nti
cip
ate
an
d s
om
ewh
at
con
vin
cin
gly
refu
te
op
po
sin
g v
iew
po
ints
• s
up
po
rt t
he p
osi
tio
n w
ith
arg
um
ents
th
at
use
id
eas
and
rel
evan
t te
xtu
al
evid
ence
fro
m a
vari
ety
of
sou
rces
• a
nti
cip
ate
an
d a
ttem
pt
to
refu
te o
pp
osi
ng
vie
wp
oin
ts a
t a
bas
ic l
evel
• s
up
po
rt t
he p
osi
tio
n
par
tiall
y,
usi
ng
so
me i
dea
s
and
tex
tual
evid
ence b
ut
wit
ho
ut
mu
ch e
lab
ora
tio
n
or
fro
m l
imit
ed s
ou
rces
• p
arti
ally
an
tici
pat
e an
d
wit
h a
lim
ited
or
con
fuse
d
atte
mp
t to
refu
te o
pp
osi
ng
vie
wp
oin
ts b
ut
• a
ttem
pt
to s
up
po
rt t
he
po
siti
on
, b
ut
tex
tual
ideas
and
ev
iden
ce
is v
agu
e,
rep
etit
ive,
or
un
just
ifie
d
• a
llu
de t
o o
pp
osi
ng
vie
wp
oin
ts b
ut
mak
e n
o
atte
mp
t to
refu
te t
hem
• c
om
ple
tely
lac
k
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
do
no
t in
clu
de
tex
tual
evid
ence
• m
ake
no
att
emp
t t o
anti
cip
ate
or
refu
te
op
po
sin
g v
iew
po
ints
Org
an
iza
tio
n:
the
exte
nt
to w
hic
h t
he
wri
tin
g e
stab
lish
es a
clea
r th
esi
s an
d
mai
nta
ins
dir
ecti
on
,
focu
s, a
nd
co
here
nce
• s
kil
lfu
lly
est
abli
sh a
nd
mai
nta
in c
on
sist
ent
focu
s o
n a
clea
r an
d c
om
pel
lin
g t
hes
is
• e
xh
ibit
lo
gic
al a
nd
co
her
ent
stru
ctu
re w
ith
cla
ims,
evid
ence
an
d i
nte
rpre
tati
on
s
that
co
nv
incin
gly
su
pp
ort
th
e
thes
is
• m
ake
skil
lfu
l u
se o
f
tran
siti
on
wo
rds
and
ph
rase
s
• e
ffect
ivel
y e
stab
lis h
an
d
mai
nta
in c
on
sist
ent
focu
s
on
a c
lear
thes
is
• e
xh
ibit
a l
og
ical
seq
uen
ce
of
cla
ims,
ev
iden
ce,
and
inte
rpre
tati
on
s to
su
pp
ort
the
thesi
s
• m
ake
effe
cti
ve u
se o
f
tran
siti
on
wo
rds
and
ph
rase
s
• e
stab
lish
an
d m
ain
tain
focu
s o
n a
cle
ar t
hesi
s
• e
xh
ibit
a l
og
ical
seq
uen
ce o
f cl
aim
s,
evid
ence
, an
d
inte
rpre
tati
on
s b
ut
ideas
wit
hin
par
agra
ph
s m
ay b
e
inco
nsi
sten
tly
org
aniz
ed
• m
ake
som
e a
ttem
pt
to
use
bas
ic t
ran
siti
on
wo
rds
and
ph
rase
s
• e
stab
lish
bu
t fa
il t
o
con
sist
entl
y m
ain
tain
fo
cus
on
a b
asi
c th
esi
s
• e
xh
ibit
a b
asic
str
uctu
re
bu
t la
ck t
he
coh
ere
nce
of
con
sist
ent
clai
ms,
ev
iden
ce,
and
in
terp
reta
tio
ns
• m
ake
an i
nco
nsi
sten
t
atte
mp
t to
use
so
me
bas
ic
tran
siti
on
wo
rds
or
ph
rase
s
• e
stab
lish
a c
on
fuse
d o
r
irre
lev
ant
thes
is a
nd
fail
to
mai
nta
in fo
cus
• e
xh
ibit
an
att
emp
t to
org
aniz
e id
eas
in
t o a
beg
inn
ing
, m
idd
le,
and
end
, b
ut
lack
co
her
ence
• m
ake
litt
le a
ttem
pt
to
use
tra
nsi
tio
n w
ord
s an
d
ph
rase
s
• f
ail
to i
nclu
de
a
thes
is o
r m
ain
tain
focu
s
• c
om
ple
te l
ack
of
org
aniz
atio
n a
nd
coh
eren
ce
• m
ake
no
att
emp
t t o
use
tra
nsi
tio
n w
ord
s o
r
ph
rase
s
La
ng
ua
ge:
th
e
exte
nt
to w
hic
h t
he
wri
tin
g r
eveal
s an
aware
nes
s o
f
aud
ien
ce a
nd
pu
rpo
se
thro
ug
h w
ord
ch
oic
e
and
sen
ten
ce
vari
ety
• a
re s
tyli
stic
ally
sop
his
ticat
ed,
usi
ng
lan
gu
age
that
is
pre
cis
e a
nd
en
gag
ing
,
wit
h a
no
tab
le s
ense
of
vo
ice
and
aw
aren
ess
of
aud
ien
ce
and
pu
rpo
se
• e
ffect
ivel
y i
nco
rpo
rate
a
ran
ge o
f v
arie
d s
ente
nce
pat
tern
s to
rev
eal
sy
nta
cti
c
flu
ency
• u
se l
ang
uag
e t
hat
is f
luen
t
and
ori
gin
al, w
ith
ev
iden
t
aware
nes
s o
f au
die
nce
an
d
pu
rpo
se
• i
nco
rpo
rate
vari
ed
sen
ten
ce
pat
tern
s th
at
rev
eal
an a
ware
nes
s o
f d
iffe
ren
t
syn
tact
ic s
tru
ctu
res
• u
se a
pp
rop
riat
e
lan
gu
age, w
ith
so
me
aware
nes
s o
f au
die
nce
an
d
pu
rpo
se
• m
ake
som
e a
ttem
pt
to
incl
ud
e d
iffe
ren
t se
nte
nce
pat
tern
s b
ut
wit
h a
wk
war
d
or
un
even
su
cces
s
• r
ely
on
bas
ic v
oca
bu
lary
,
wit
h l
ittl
e aw
are
ness
of
aud
ien
ce o
r p
urp
ose
• r
eveal
a l
imit
ed a
war
eness
of
ho
w t
o v
ary
sen
ten
ce
pat
tern
s an
d r
ely
on
a
lim
ited
ran
ge
syn
tact
ic
stru
ctu
res
• u
se l
ang
uag
e t
hat
is
imp
recis
e o
r u
nsu
itab
le f
or
the
aud
ien
ce o
r p
urp
ose
• r
eveal
a c
on
fuse
d
un
der
stan
din
g o
f h
ow
to
wri
te i
n c
om
ple
te
sen
ten
ces
and
lit
tle o
r n
o
abil
ity
to
vary
sen
ten
ce
pat
tern
s
• u
se l
ang
uag
e t
hat
i s
inco
her
ent
or
inap
pro
pri
ate
• i
nclu
de
a
pre
po
nd
eran
ce
of
sen
ten
ce
frag
men
ts
and
ru
n-o
ns
that
sig
nif
ican
tly
hin
der
com
pre
hen
sio
n
Co
nv
enti
on
s:
the
exte
nt
to w
hic
h t
he
wri
tin
g e
xh
ibit
s
con
ven
tio
nal
spel
lin
g, p
un
ctu
ati
on
,
par
agra
ph
ing
,
cap
ital
izat
ion
, an
d
gra
mm
ar
• d
emo
nst
rate
co
ntr
ol
of
the
con
ven
tio
ns
wit
h e
ssen
tiall
y
no
err
ors
, ev
en w
ith
sop
his
ticat
ed l
ang
uag
e
• d
emo
nst
rate
co
ntr
ol
of
the
con
ven
tio
ns,
ex
hib
itin
g
occ
asio
nal
err
ors
on
ly w
hen
usi
ng
so
ph
isti
cat
ed
lan
gu
age (
e.g
., p
un
ctu
atio
n
of
com
ple
x s
ente
nce
s)
• d
emo
nst
rate
par
tial
con
tro
l, e
xh
ibit
ing
occ
asio
nal
err
ors
th
at
do
no
t h
ind
er c
om
pre
hen
sio
n
(e.g
., i
nco
rrec
t u
se o
f
ho
mo
ny
ms)
• d
emo
nst
rate
em
erg
ing
con
tro
l, e
xh
ibit
ing
fre
qu
ent
erro
rs t
hat
so
mew
hat
hin
der
com
pre
hen
sio
n (
e.g
.,
agre
emen
t o
f p
ron
ou
ns
and
ante
ced
ents
; sp
elli
ng
of
bas
ic w
ord
s)
• d
emo
nst
rate
lack
of
con
tro
l, e
xh
ibit
ing
freq
uen
t er
rors
th
at m
ake
com
pre
hen
sio
n d
iffi
cult
(e.g
., s
ub
ject
verb
agre
emen
t; u
se o
f sl
ang
)
• i
lleg
ible
or
un
reco
gn
izab
le a
s
lite
rate
En
gli
sh
EN
GL
ISH
LA
NG
UA
GE
AR
TS
PE
RS
UA
SIV
E W
RIT
ING
RU
BR
IC
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 24
Performance List for Writing FictionPrimary Level
1. I have an interesting setting and characters for my story.
Terrific O.K. Needs
Work
What will you try to do better the next time you write a story?
2. The problem in my story willbe clear to my readers.
3. My story events are in order.
4. The solution will be clear to my readers.
5. I used many describing words to tell what is happening. 6. My words “paint a picture.”
7. I have a title that goes with my story.
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 25
INFORMATION GATHERING and PROCESSING
Effectively uses a variety of information-gathering techniques and information resources.4 Uses the important information-gathering techniques and information resources necessary to complete the task. Identifies little-known information resources or uses unique information- gathering techniques.3 Uses the important information-gathering techniques and information resources necessary to complete the task.2 Fails to use some significant information-gathering techniques and information resources necessary to complete the task.1 Fails to use the most important information-gathering techniques or the major information resources necessary to complete the task.
Effectively interprets and synthesizes information.4 Interprets the information gathered for a task in accurate and highly insightful ways. Provides a highly creative and unique synthesis of the information.3 Accurately interprets information gathered for a task and concisely synthesizes it.2 Makes significant errors in interpreting the information gathered for a task or synthesizes the information imprecisely or awkwardly.1 Grossly misinterprets the information gathered for the task or fails to synthesize it.
Accurately assesses the value of information.4 Analyzes information in detail, accurately and insightfully determining whether it is credible and relevant to a specific task.3 Accurately determines whether information is credible and relevant to a specific task.2 Makes some significant errors in determining whether information is credible and relevant to a specific task.1 Makes little or no attempt to determine whether information is credible and relevant to a specific task or totally misjudges the relevance and credibility of information.
Recognizes where and how projects would benefit from additional information.4 Insightfully determines the types of information that will benefit a task and effectively seeks out that information.3 Accurately assesses a task to identify areas requiring additional information for clarification or support and seeks out the needed information.2 Does not accurately assess the information needs of the task or fails to seek out needed information.1 Makes little or no attempt to assess whether a task would benefit from additional information.
Generic Rubric for 21st Century Skills
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 26
COLLABORATION and TEAMWORK
Works towards the achievement of group goals.4 Actively helps identify group goals and works hard to meet them.3 Communicates commitment to the group goals and effectively carries out assigned roles.2 Communicates a commitment to the group goals but does not carry out assigned roles.1 Does not work toward group goals or actively works against them.
Demonstrates effective interpersonal skills.4 Actively promotes effective group interaction and the expression of ideas and opinions in a way that is sensitive to the feelings and knowledge base of others.3 Participates in group interaction without prompting. Expresses ideas and opinions in a way that is sensitive to the feelings and knowledge base of others.2 Participates in group interaction with prompting or expresses ideas and opinions without considering the feelings and knowledge base of others.1 Does not participate in group interaction, even with prompting, or expresses ideas and opinions in a way that is insensitive to the feelings or knowledge base of others.
Contributes to group maintenance.4 Actively helps the group identify changes or modifications necessary in the group process and works toward carrying out those changes.3 Helps identify changes or modifications necessary in the group process and works toward carrying out those changes.2 When prompted, helps identify changes or modifications necessary in the group process, or is only minimally involved in carrying out those changes.1 Does not attempt to identify changes or modifications necessary in the group process, even when prompted, or refuses to work toward carrying out those changes.
Effectively performs a variety of roles within a group.4 Effectively performs multiple roles within the group.3 Effectively performs two roles within the group.2 Makes an attempt to perform more than one role within the group but has little success with secondary roles.
Generic Rubric for 21st Century Skills
Source: Marzano, B., Pickering, D. and McTighe, J. (1993) Assessing Outcomes: Performance Assessment based on the Dimensions of Learning Model. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Understanding-based Curriculum and Cornerstone Assessments
© 2012 Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins 27
CRITERIA1. The task addresses/assesses targeted standard(s) and associated Mission-related goals.
2. The task involves a complex, real-world (i.e., “authentic”) application of knowledge and skills.
3. The task calls for understanding and transfer, not simply recall ora formulaic response.
4. The task requires explanation and/or support – not just an answer.
5. The task(s) is/are contextualized; i.e., written in the G.R.A.S.P.S. form.
6. The task effectively integrates two or more subject areas
7. The task includes criteria/rubric(s) targeting distinct traits of understanding and successful performance based on the targeted standard(s)/understanding(s); i.e., criteria do not simply focus on sur-face features of a product or performance.
8. The task directions for students are clear. Optional: 9. The task allows students to demonstrate their understanding/proficiency with some appropriate choice/variety (e.g., of products or performances).
10. The task incorporates appropriate use of technology.
Other: _______________________________________________
__________________________________________________
Cornerstone Task Review Criteria
3 2 1
KEY TO RATINGS: 3 = extensively 2 = somewhat 1 = not yet
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1