designing clinical trials with bite antibody constructs by ... constructs by leveraging from...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Designing clinical trials with BiTE®
antibody constructs by leveraging from nonclinical dataBenno RattelBiologics Congress Berlin, 2015
3
(1) Strictly target cell-dependent activation of resting T cells by BiTE®
(2) Highly potent and complete lysis of target cell by BiTE® activated T cells
(3) Lysis of dividing as well as non-dividing target cells
(4) Serial lysis by BiTE®-activated T cells
(5) Sustained proliferation of BiTE®-activated T cells
(6) Does not require MHC Class I andpeptide antigen for recognition by T cell
(7) Does not require T cell clone with specificT cell receptor
Key Hallmarks of BiTE® Mode of Action
Hoffmann, P. et al. Intl J Cancer 2005; 115: 98-104
4
• CD19-CD3 bispecific BiTE antibody construct• Clinically developed for treatment of r/r ALL• Received breakthrough designation from the US FDA
in July 2014• BLA submitted to FDA in Sept 2014 and to EMA in Oct
2014
6
The New BiTE® Platform is NHP Cross‐reactive
BLINCYTOTM New Platforms v3.0
Target Human and Chimpanzee Human and NHP
T Cells (CD3) Human and Chimpanzee Human and NHP
8
• Side-by-side comparison of pharmacology in human and toxicology species systems
For bispecific binding– binding affinity for human and Cyno target antigens– epitope mapping– specificity of binding
In Vitro Pharmacology Package for First in Human (FiH) Study
9
In Vitro Pharmacology Package for FiH Study Continued
For redirected lysis– dose-response of target cell lysis with various target cells
• correlation of EC50 of lysis with target expression level• specificity of target cell lysis
– kinetics of lysis– dependence on effector to target ratios– target cell lysis by various T cell populations– PBMC / T cell donor variability– redirected lysis of patient-derived malignant cells by
autologous T cells (ex vivo PoC)
10
In Vitro: Blinatumomab‐Redirected Lysis
Amgen Report No. 103-PCD-0061
MT103 [ng/mL]
Spec
ific
Lysi
s [%
]
NCEB-1
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
GRANTA-519
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
HBL-2
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
A
C
E
EHEB
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
MEC-1
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
Karpas-422
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-4 10-2 100 1020
B
D
F
MT103 [ng/mL]
Spec
ific
Lysi
s [%
]
NCEB-1
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
GRANTA-519
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
HBL-2
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
A
C
E
EHEB
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
MEC-1
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020
Karpas-422
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
10-4 10-2 100 1020
B
D
F
Redirected Lysis (EC90 ) of Human B Lymphoma Lines at approx.0.5 ng/ml
Redirected Lysis (EC90 ) of Human B Lymphoma Lines at approx.0.5 ng/ml
11
Estimation of a Therapeutic Dose Based on In Vitro PD Data
• EC90 of BLINCYTOTM -mediated redirected lysis: ~ 0.5 ng/mL
• In the clinic, anti-tumor activity was observed at a c.i.v
dose of 15 µg/m2/d
• Blinatumomab steady state serum concentration at 15
µg/m2/d: 0.62 ng/mL (range 0.18-1.0 ng/mL)
In vitro EC90 data predicted the human exposure required for anti-tumorefficacy
12
• Sample derived from B-CLL Patient with very low E:T cell ratio (1:48)
Ex vivo: Elimination of Lymphoma Cells byBlinatumomab Analogue
Löffler et al. Leukemia 2003 17:900-909
13
Example: Ex vivo Elimination of AML Blasts by AMG 330
Kupka, C. et al. Blood 2014 Jan 16;123(3):356-65
14
Example: Ex Vivo Depletion of CD33+ Cells from Cyno Bone Marrow by AMG 330
0 24 48 72 96 120 144
0
20
40
60
80
100
w/o AMG 330with AMG 330
Time [h]
CD
33+ [%
of v
iabl
e ce
lls]
0 24 48 72 96 120 144
0
20
40
60
80
100 with AMG 330w/o AMG 330
Time [h]
T-ce
lls [%
of a
ll ce
lls]
Friedrich, M. et al., Mol Cancer Ther. 2014 Jun;13(6):1549-57.13(6)
15
In Vitro Pharmacology Package for FiH Study Continued
• For dose- and target cell-dependent T cell activation– induction of surface markers for early and late T cell
activation– increase in T cell size and induction of proliferation– specificity of T cell activation – expression of granzyme and perforin in BiTE®
antibody-activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells– time- and dose-dependency of cytokine release by T
cells
16
Example: In Vitro Induction of T CellProliferation by BLINCYTOTM
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
63 6.3 0.63 0.063 0.0063 0 MT102 PHA/ IL2
MT103 Concentration [ng/mL]
Prol
ifera
tion
[%]
CD19-depleted PBMCPBMC
Amgen Report No. 103-PCD-0065
Blinatumomab Concentration [ng/mL]
17
Ensuing T Cell Expansion in Patients
T C
ells
[103 /
l]
Baseli
ne
Maxim
um
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
p = 0.0002
T C
ells
[103 /
l]
Baseli
ne
Maxim
um
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Klinger et al. Blood. 2012;119:6226-33
18
Example: In Vitro Target Cell‐dependent Inductionof Activation Markers on T Cells by BLINCYTOTM
No Target Cells CHO (10%) CHO-CD19 (1%) CHO-CD19 (5%) CHO-CD19 (10%)
10
20
30
40
50
CD
69- o
r CD
25-p
ositi
veT
Cel
ls [%
]
CD69 - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + +CD25 + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - -CD4 + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + -CD8 - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - +
Brischwein , K. et al. J Immunother. 2007;30:798-807
19
T‐Cell Activation Marker CD69 on CD8+ and CD4+T Cells is Transiently Upregulated
• The T-cell activation marker CD69 was investigated for 6 patients and is transiently upregulated on CD8+ and CD4+ T cells after infusion start in cycle 1.
20
BLINCYTOTM‐induced Cytokine Release In Vitro
Cytokines
Cyt
okin
e [p
g/m
L]
IFN- TNF IL-10 IL-6 IL-4 IL-20
200
400
600
800
1500200025003000 Cytotox Assay with 1 µg/mL MT103
Cytotox Assay w/o MT103
21
Cycle 2
Time Point [Days]
Mea
n C
ytok
ine
Con
cent
ratio
n [p
g/m
l]
00.1
10.1
70.3
30.5
9 1 2 7 14 21 28
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900 IL-2IL-6IL-10IFN-TNF-
B
Cytokine Release by BLINCYTOTM is Transient and Modest
Mean Peak Cytokine Levels in Serum of all Assessable Patients
Klinger et al. Blood. 2012;119:6226-33
22
Cytokine Profiles of Individual Patients after 60 µg/m2/day BLINCYTOTM given as First Dose or After Double Dose Steps
• Cytokine elevation was reduced after a stepwise dosing approach to a target dose of 60 µg/m2/day compared to a starting dose of 60 µg/m2/day
Note: Data < LOD were set to 10 pg/mL ( ½ LOD).
N= 9N= 21
60 µg/m2/day5 15 60 µg/m2/day
23
In Vivo: Activity of BLINCYTOTM
Amgen Report No. 103-PCD-0098 and R20130026
Raji Burkitt‘s Lymphoma Xenograft Granta-519 Mantle Cell Lymphoma Xenograft
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
1750
2000 Gr.1 Vehicle w/o PBMCGr.2 VehicleGr.3 AMG 103 (0.5 mg/kg)Gr.4 AMG 103 (0.05 mg/kg)Gr.5 AMG 103 (0.005 mg/kg)Gr.6 AMG 103 (0.0005 mg/kg)
Days after Tumor Cell Injection
Tum
or V
olum
e [m
m3 ]
Treatment(days 1-5)
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100
Treatmentq1dx26
1 Vehicle control w/o T cells
2 Vehicle control
3 AMG 103 (0.267 mg/kg/day); **
4 AMG 103 (0.027 mg/kg/day); **
5 AMG 103 (0.003 mg/kg/day); ***
6 AMG 103 (0.133 mg/kg/day); ***
Day of study
Surv
ival
[%]
• Efficacy in a panel of xenograft models
24
Peripheral B‐Cells are Depleted and T Cells Redistribute During BLINCYTOTM Treatment
• B- and T-cell counts varied widely between patients before infusion start.
• For all but one patient (nonresponder), peripheral B cells were depleted rapidly (< 1 week for most patients) and remained undetectable throughout treatment.
• There was a swift redistribution of T cells after treatment start (day 1) and dose step (day 8); T-cell counts recovered to baseline within several days, where they remained stable in most patients.
25
10 -1
10 -2
10 -3
10 -4
MRD pos.
MRD neg.
07-07 09-07 11-07 01-08 03-08 05-08 07-08 09-08 11-08
Cons. 1 Cons. 2 Cons. 3 Cons. 4Induction
Chemotherapy GMALL (Elderly) Protocol
Blinatumomab
Study PopulationB-precursor ALL patients in complete hematological remission with molecular failure or molecular relapse at any time after chemotherapy
Leukemia
Phase 2 Study with Blinatumomab inPatients with Residual B‐ALL in Bone Marrow
Treatment4 week continuous infusionDose: 15 g/m²/d
Patient #109-002
27
• Study of target-related risk – TCR studies and RNA expression profiles– Comparative target distribution between human and cyno
tissue panels
• Comparative in vitro pharmacology in human and cynoco-culture systems incl. determination of MABEL
• Studies in non-human primates– Exploratory dose range-finding in cyno monkeys – Toxicity study in cyno monkeys including detailed
hematology, toxicokinetics, immunogenicity and safety pharmacology assessments
Toxicology Package for FiH Study
28
Example : Determination of MABEL
0
20
40
60
80
100
10- 4 10- 2 100 102 1040MT112/BAY2010112 [ng/mL]
Spec
ific
Lysi
s [%
]
Effector cells: human PBMC (n=20)
Amgen Report No. 112-NCD-0007
MABEL is the minimum anticipated biological effect level Selection of the Most
Sensitive Test System Cell line with highest
expression of TAA surface molecules
Detemination of the most sensitive endpoint:redirected lysisT cell activationcytokine release
BiTE [ng/mL]
29
• Transient elevation of body temperature • Transient cytokine release• Hematologic changes
– transient reduction in LYMPH and MONO (recovered by Day 8)
– increased CD4 and CD8 cell activation (CD69) transient increase in NEUT
• Acute phase response elevated CRP, reduced albumin, increased globulin and
fibrinogen
Common Effects Observed in Cynos within the First 48 hrs of Treatment
30
Example: PD Endpoints in Cyno StudiesControl BiTE®-treated Group
Day 7BloodFACS
BoneMarrowFACS
Prestudy Day 7
Bone marrow
(sternum)
31
Cyno Model Relevant and Translates to Clinic• Cyno is a pharmacologically-relevant model PD effects present indicators of BiTE® activity observed signs of toxicity dependent on tumor-target expression on
normal tissues
• BiTE® effects in cyno mimic those observed clinically– body temperature changes = fever/chills cytokine release hematological changes acute inflammatory response
32
• Amgen– Matthias Friedrich– Oliver Thomas– Petra Deegen– Anja Henn– Alexander Sternjak– Grit Lorenczewski– Patrick A. Bäuerle– Andreas Wolf– and the ARM technical staff
Acknowledgements