design and operation of uasb
DESCRIPTION
Ingeniería ambientalTRANSCRIPT
1
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Design and operation of UASB for treatment of domestic wastewater
Jules B. van LierWageningen University /Lettinga Associates Foundation (LeAF)
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
influent
screening grit chamber
sludge drying bedreuse
effluentU A S B
watersludgebiogas
biogas use
- polishing pond- Trickling filter- RBC- etc.
General lay-out of an anaerobic WWT plant
Post treatment
2
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
sludgewithdrawal
biogas
treatedwater
wastewater
feedinlet
deflectorbeam
Distribution box
effluentgutter
gascollector
sludge bed
sludge blanket
biogas
settling zone aperture
baffle
The UASB Reactor
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Internal view 1200 m3 UASB, Cali, Colombia
3
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
sludgewithdrawal
biogas
Treated water
wastewater
feedinlet
deflectorbeam
Distribution box
effluentgutter
gascollector
sludge bed
sludge blanket
biogas
settling zone aperture
baffle
density
minimum SRT
concentration
concentration
detention time
angle
loading rate
upflow velocity
number
angle
velocity
Design Criteria for the UASB Reactor
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Critical Parameters for Design of a UASB Reactor
Vieira et al, 1986
4
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
SRT as prime design criterion:SRT is directly linked to the amount of viable, active biomass in the system:
SRT = X / (dX/dt),with X = concentration of viable biomass (e.g.methanogens ).
SRT is determined by:
- incoming suspended solids- solids digestion in the reactor - filtering capacity sludge bed (upflow velocities + sludge characteristics)- growth of new sludge- sludge retention in the settler (upflow velocities)- withdrawal of excess sludge
SRTmin. ≥ 3 * Td (doubling time) of critical biomass (e.g. methanogens)
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Temperature [°C]
SR
T fo
r st
abili
zed
slu
dg
e [d
ays]
Required SRT for Hydrolysis in Reactor
5
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Impact of Reduced Hydrolysis
At low temperatures (< 15ºC) and/or strong temperature fluctuations between summer (25ºC) and winter (15ºC), the singlestep UASB design needs reconsideration:
Limited Hydrolysis
Accumulation of particulate organic matter
Deterioration of the reactor performance
Low removal efficiency
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Conventional Design of Single Stage UASB reactors
Temperature.: > 20 °CCOD infl.: < 1000 mg/lSS-influent: < 500 mg/l
6
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Relationship between pollution strength and reactor volume
Assumptions:Θmin = 4 h Q = 250 m3 · h-1
rv= 15 kg COD · m-3 · d-1
hydraulic load = 6 m3 · m- 3 · d-1
2000
1500
1000
500
01 2 3 4 50
Vr = Θ · Q Vr = (c · Q) · rv-1
c (kg COD · m -3)
Vr(m
3 )
Assessment of the size of a UASB Reactor
Normal COD-range for domestic sewage
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
The feed inlet distribution system is a crucial part of the reactor
It is important to accomplish optimal contact between sludge and
waste water, i.e.
The danger of channelling will be bigger at low gas production rates
(less than 1 m3 · m3 · day1)
Feed Inlet System
to prevent channelling of the waste water through the sludge bed
to avoid the formation of dead corners in the reactor
7
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Rough guidelines for the number of inlet points required in UASB reactors
treating mainly soluble waste waters
Type of sludge Area (m2)
per feed inlet point
Granular sludge
Loading rate
(kg COD . m-3 . day-1)
< 2
2 - 4
> 4
Dense flocculant sludge (>40 kg DS/m3)
< 1
1 - 2
> 2
Medium thick flocculant sludge
(20 - 40 kg DS/m3)
<1 - 2
> 3
0.5
1 - 2
>2
0.5 - 1
1 - 2
2 - 3
1 - 2
2 - 5
Number of Inlet Points
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Drawing of UASB for Sewage Treatment
Feed inlet pipes
Influent
Influent
Effluent
Gas
8
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Feed Distribution Systems
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Design of a Rectangular Inlet Box
9
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Full-scale anaerobic sewage treatment plant, Bucaramanga, Colombia
Gas outlet
effluent
2nd influent distribution box
3rd influent distribution boxes
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Concrete plates for the GSS-device
Problem: leakage!
Full-scale anaerobic sewage treatment plant, Bucaramanga, Colombia
10
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Polyester Circular Distribution Box
Maintenance (declogging)
Clogged inlet pipe
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Feed Inlet Tubes
Sludge discharge pipes
Warning: poor design!
Long inlet tubes on bottom may cause clogging
11
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
The use of specific nozzles or perforated inlet pipes placed
at the bottom of the reactor
Intermittent supply of the feed
Every feed-inlet system should be easy to clean
A conically shaped reactor bottom, or a multi-cone reactor
bottom is attractive
Other Aspects of the Feed Distribution System
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
separation of the biogas and discharging this from the reactor
to prevent as efficiently as possible the wash out of viable bacterial
matter
to enable the sludge to slide back into the digester compartment
to serve as a kind of barrier (stopper) for rapid excessive
expansions of a sludge blanket (which is mainly composed of
flocculant sludge) into the settler
to provide a polishing effect
to prevent the wash out of floating granular sludge
Main Objectives the Gas Liquid Solids Separator (GLSS) Device
12
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
foaming (when proteins and/or fats are present)
Remedy:
install anti-foam sprayers
scum layer formation (particularly in presence of fats) in the settler or
gas bowl
Remedies:
do not place a baffle in front of the effluent launder (will lead to high effluent SS)
install a skimmer in the settler compartment
remove the scum layer from the gas bowl
install agitators for settling down and/or mixing-up floating matter with active sludge
Problems with the GLSS Device
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
The slope of the settler bottom (i.e. the inclined wall of the gas collector) should be between 45-60o
The surface area of the apertures between the gas collectorsshould be 15-20% of the reactor surface area.
The height of the gas collector should be between 1.5-2 m at reactor heights of 5-7 m.
To facilitate the release and collection of gas bubbles and to combat scum layer formation, a liquid-gas interface should be maintained in the gas collector.
Tentative Guidelines for the Design of the GLSS Device (1)
13
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
To avoid up-flowing gas bubbles to enter the settler compartment, the overlap of the baffles installed beneath the apertures should be 10-20 cm.
Generally, scum layer baffles should be installed in front of the effluent weirs.
The diameter of the gas exhaust pipes should be sufficient to guarantee the easy removal of the biogas from the gas collectioncap, particularly in case of foaming.
In the upper part of the gas cap, anti-foam spray nozzles should be installed in the case the treatment of the waste water is accompanied with heavy foaming.
Tentative Guidelines for the Design of the GLSS Device (2)
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
UASB design for industrial WW (Biopaq process)
Increase of the (critical) aparture width by placement of 3 small settlers above each other
14
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
UASB design for industrial WW (Biothane process)
gas
sludge
water
Effect of “mammoth flow”: indirect increase of aperture
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Settler Equipped With Tiltable Plate Settler (TPS)
15
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Tiltable plate settlers (TPS’s) in Biotim UASB-reactors
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Cross-flow TPS of Biotim
gas
sludge
water
16
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Discharge excess sludge: equip the reactor with sludge
discharge pipes 1) nearby the bottom, 2) halfway and 3)
approximately half a meter beneath the GSS device.
Assessment of the total quantity of sludge in the reactor: install a
number (5 or 6) of valves over the height of the reactor to be able to
make a sludge profile.
Sludge Discharge
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
measurement and registration of the influent flow
measurement/control of temperature and pH
measurement and registration of the reactor temperature and pH
(particularly in the lower part of the reactor)
measurement and registration of the gas production rate and the
gas composition with respect to the CO2 content and the H2S
content
Auxiliary Equipment Requirements (1)
17
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
installations for the addition of essential nutrients (N, P and S),
alkalinity, and trace elements
heat exchangers (also desirable for occasionally heating the
reactor content in the case accumulated biodegradable solids
have to be removed from the sludge)
Auxiliary Equipment Requirements (2)
Tentative requirements:
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
1. The biggest problem takes place above the water level:
Air oxygen oxidizes H2S to sulphate. This can lead to very
low local pH conditions. This will affect both concrete and
steel.
2. Corrosion also occurs under the water level:
Corrosion by dissolved CO2: CaO from concrete will
dissolve as H2CO3 is present.
Corrosion of Construction Materials (1)
18
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
stainless steel
plastics
proper coatings
coated concrete rather than coated steel
plastic covered with impregnated hardwood for the settler
plastic fortified plywood
asbestos
Corrosion of Construction Materials (2)
Prevention of corrosion by using proper construction materials:
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Collection and treatment of gases
Reduction of corrosion
Prevention of the Release of Malodorous Compounds
Covering the anaerobic reactor allows:
19
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Virtual Wastewater Data & Assumptions for UASB Design (1)
Wastewater dataAverage flowMaximum flowPeak flowCODBCOD (degradable COD)BODTSSAsh contentSO4
PO4
TKN
4009002400225250
m3/h
m3/htimes max. flowmg/lmg/lmg/l
4025325
%mg/lmg P/lmg N/l
200 mg/l
Calculation example using an automated approach
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Sludge production assumptionsY totalY methaneDegradation non-sludge VSSSludge ash content
0.080.034055
Kg VSS.kg CODinKg VSS.kg CODin%%
UASB operational aspectsTemperaturepH
227.5
°C-
Biogas aspectsCOD conversion effieciencyCH4 percentage in biogasDissolved in the waterDissolved in the water
60652263
% of BCODin into CH4
% biogasNml CH4
Mg CH4-COD
Virtual Wastewater Data & Assumptions for UASB Design (2)
20
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Case: Design of UASB Reactors for 50,000 PE (1)
Reactor dimensionsNumber of reactorsWidthLengthHeightDefinitive number of feed inlets
224.0018.004.50108
-mmm-
Gas collectorTotal widthAperture percentageWidth gas collectorPlate projectionPlate heightg
3.00232.300.901.07
m%mmm
Model output:
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Feed inlet boxesMaximum servicing areaSuitable number of feed inlets per boxNumber of feed inlet boxesMinimum feed pipe diameter
50.0012947
m2
--mm
Effluent guttersLength of guttersV-notches per meterV-notch depthGutter widthGutter depthWater depth
28848.020.020.010.2
mPer mcmcmcmcm
Case: Design of UASB Reactors for 50,000 PE (2)
Model output:
21
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Reactor loadingVolumetric loadingVolumetric loading rateOrganic loading rateBiogas loading rate
0.990.560.030.40
Kg COD.m-3.d-1
Kg BCOD.m-3.d-1
Kg BCOD.kg VSS-1.d-1
m3 .m-2.d-1
Biological parametersSolids retebtion timeMaximum methanogenic activityActual methanogenic activityBiogas productionH2S content
67.50.090.023500.04
DaysKg CH4-COD/kg VSS.dayKg CH4-COD/kg VSS.daym3/day% in biogas
Sludge productionEffluent TSS =>to be setSludge growthSludge to be removedSludge volume to be removed
302304201629
mg TSS/lKg/dayKg/daym3/day
Case: Design of UASB Reactors for 50,000 PE (3)
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Sludge drying bedsSludge bed loading => to be setSludge dried to => to be setSludge productionDrying bed surface area, totalDrying bed sideDrying bed surface areaNumber of drying bedsDried sludge to be removed
0.8612.02016235818.00324916.8
Kg.m -2.day-1
%kg/daym2
mm2
-m3/day
Case: Design of UASB Reactors for 50,000 PE (4)
22
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
upflow velocity
Economic Evolution of Design Criteria
feed inlet distance
solids retention time
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50
UPFLOW VELOCITY (m/h)
RE
LA
TIV
E C
OS
TS
(%
)
Influence of Upflow Velocity on UASB Reactor Costs
23
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Vup (m/h)
EC
OD
(%)
Treatment Efficiency As a Function of Upflow Velocity
COD-total
COD-soluble
BOD-total
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
80
90
100
110
120
1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40
FEED INLET DISTANCE (m)
RE
LATI
VE
CO
STS
(%
)
Influence of Feed Inlet Distance on UASB Reactor Costs
24
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
80
100
120
140
160
80 100 120 140 160
RELATIVE SURFACE/HEIGHT (%)
RE
LATI
VE
CO
STS
(%
)
Influence of Reactor Size on UASB Reactor Costs
surfaceheight
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Difficulties in Introducing AWWT for Sewage
Ignorance with the system in practiceAbsence of required infra structure, regarding:
Experienced contractors / consultants
non or poorly informed authoritieslittle if any full scale experiencelittle experience in research institutes and universities
Commercial disinterest at established consultants specialised on conventional systemsUniversity research is considered academic (not for practice)
25
WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY Sub-department of Environmental Technology
Lettinga Associates Foundation
Enhancing Implementation of AWWT
Establish contacts with universities, experienced contractors and consultants Start co-operation with polluting industries: either for environmental protection or energy recoveryAcquire subsidiary projects for pilot or demosAwareness amongst industries, authorities, and politiciansIncrease (scientific) research activities at universitiesEducate engineers and operatorsRaise specialised consultants / contractorsHave well informed engineers in agencies and water control boards